Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/06/2018 - 14:54
Display Headline
Colon Exams Follow Abnormal Stool Tests Only Half the Time

ATLANTA — Only about half the people who screen positive for blood in the stool during routine physical examinations are thoroughly checked for colorectal cancer, according to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Complete colon examinations were reported by 71 (53.1%) of 136 participants who said they had an abnormal fecal occult blood test (FOBT) that was not done because of a specific problem or as a follow-up to an earlier test.

A total of 22 people said they had no colon evaluation at all. Another 16 people reported that their doctors ordered a repeat of the FOBT. Eight had sigmoidoscopy, and three had a barium enema. Twelve patients went on to surgery, and four patients did not know what, if anything, was done as a result of their abnormal FOBT.

“The follow-up to screening seems to be a black box,” Dr. Lisa C. Richardson said in an interview at the poster session where she presented the data.

Dr. Richardson, a medical officer in the CDC's Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, reviewed the responses of 4,908 people who participated in the 2000 National Health Interview Survey Cancer Control Supplement, a nationally representative sample of households. A total of 80% said they had had the FOBT screen for colorectal cancer, she said.

She and CDC coinvestigator Zahava Berkowitz determined that 287 respondents reported they had an abnormal FOBT result. Of these, 151 were excluded from the sample because their tests were prompted by a specific problem or were done to follow-up on an earlier exam. The other 136 patients screened positive during routine FOBT.

Analysis of demographic factors showed that people were more likely to receive a complete colon examination if they were older than 65, reported excellent or very good health status, or had a college education.

Complete colon examination is the only screening method that has been shown to reduce the incidence of and mortality from colorectal cancer in randomized trials, according to the investigators.

Dr. Richardson noted that the patient-reported data correspond to previous studies of FOBT follow-up and to physicians surveys in which only 50%–60% of respondents said they recommend total colon examination after an abnormal FOBT.

“Some doctors don't trust the fecal occult blood test results. They don't think a whole colon examination is necessary,” she said.

'The follow-up to [positive fecal occult blood test] screening seems to be a black box.' DR. RICHARDSON

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Article PDF
Article PDF

ATLANTA — Only about half the people who screen positive for blood in the stool during routine physical examinations are thoroughly checked for colorectal cancer, according to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Complete colon examinations were reported by 71 (53.1%) of 136 participants who said they had an abnormal fecal occult blood test (FOBT) that was not done because of a specific problem or as a follow-up to an earlier test.

A total of 22 people said they had no colon evaluation at all. Another 16 people reported that their doctors ordered a repeat of the FOBT. Eight had sigmoidoscopy, and three had a barium enema. Twelve patients went on to surgery, and four patients did not know what, if anything, was done as a result of their abnormal FOBT.

“The follow-up to screening seems to be a black box,” Dr. Lisa C. Richardson said in an interview at the poster session where she presented the data.

Dr. Richardson, a medical officer in the CDC's Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, reviewed the responses of 4,908 people who participated in the 2000 National Health Interview Survey Cancer Control Supplement, a nationally representative sample of households. A total of 80% said they had had the FOBT screen for colorectal cancer, she said.

She and CDC coinvestigator Zahava Berkowitz determined that 287 respondents reported they had an abnormal FOBT result. Of these, 151 were excluded from the sample because their tests were prompted by a specific problem or were done to follow-up on an earlier exam. The other 136 patients screened positive during routine FOBT.

Analysis of demographic factors showed that people were more likely to receive a complete colon examination if they were older than 65, reported excellent or very good health status, or had a college education.

Complete colon examination is the only screening method that has been shown to reduce the incidence of and mortality from colorectal cancer in randomized trials, according to the investigators.

Dr. Richardson noted that the patient-reported data correspond to previous studies of FOBT follow-up and to physicians surveys in which only 50%–60% of respondents said they recommend total colon examination after an abnormal FOBT.

“Some doctors don't trust the fecal occult blood test results. They don't think a whole colon examination is necessary,” she said.

'The follow-up to [positive fecal occult blood test] screening seems to be a black box.' DR. RICHARDSON

ATLANTA — Only about half the people who screen positive for blood in the stool during routine physical examinations are thoroughly checked for colorectal cancer, according to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Complete colon examinations were reported by 71 (53.1%) of 136 participants who said they had an abnormal fecal occult blood test (FOBT) that was not done because of a specific problem or as a follow-up to an earlier test.

A total of 22 people said they had no colon evaluation at all. Another 16 people reported that their doctors ordered a repeat of the FOBT. Eight had sigmoidoscopy, and three had a barium enema. Twelve patients went on to surgery, and four patients did not know what, if anything, was done as a result of their abnormal FOBT.

“The follow-up to screening seems to be a black box,” Dr. Lisa C. Richardson said in an interview at the poster session where she presented the data.

Dr. Richardson, a medical officer in the CDC's Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, reviewed the responses of 4,908 people who participated in the 2000 National Health Interview Survey Cancer Control Supplement, a nationally representative sample of households. A total of 80% said they had had the FOBT screen for colorectal cancer, she said.

She and CDC coinvestigator Zahava Berkowitz determined that 287 respondents reported they had an abnormal FOBT result. Of these, 151 were excluded from the sample because their tests were prompted by a specific problem or were done to follow-up on an earlier exam. The other 136 patients screened positive during routine FOBT.

Analysis of demographic factors showed that people were more likely to receive a complete colon examination if they were older than 65, reported excellent or very good health status, or had a college education.

Complete colon examination is the only screening method that has been shown to reduce the incidence of and mortality from colorectal cancer in randomized trials, according to the investigators.

Dr. Richardson noted that the patient-reported data correspond to previous studies of FOBT follow-up and to physicians surveys in which only 50%–60% of respondents said they recommend total colon examination after an abnormal FOBT.

“Some doctors don't trust the fecal occult blood test results. They don't think a whole colon examination is necessary,” she said.

'The follow-up to [positive fecal occult blood test] screening seems to be a black box.' DR. RICHARDSON

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Colon Exams Follow Abnormal Stool Tests Only Half the Time
Display Headline
Colon Exams Follow Abnormal Stool Tests Only Half the Time
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media