Article Type
Changed
Sat, 12/08/2018 - 14:49

 

Among ICU patients receiving invasive ventilation, on-demand nebulization of acetylcysteine or salbutamol was noninferior to routine nebulization with both medications, according to the results of a randomized clinical trial presented by Frederique Paulus, RN, PhD.

In this study, adverse events such as tachyarrhythmia and agitation were less frequent with the on-demand approach, in which patients receive nebulization based on strict clinical indications, Dr. Paulus reported at the Critical Care Congress sponsored by the Society for Critical Care Medicine. The study was published simultaneously in JAMA.

Andrew Bowser/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Frederique Paulus
“On-demand nebulization was noninferior to routine nebulization, but routine nebulization is associated with more side effects, so we think on-demand nebulization may be a reasonable alternative to routine nebulization,” said Dr. Paulus of the department of intensive care at the Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, during her presentation.

The on-demand approach may also be cost saving, she noted, citing an economic analysis underway that is not yet ready for publication.

“In our ICU, it will save us 350,000 Euros a year,” she said. “In the Netherlands, 40,000 patients will be mechanically ventilated in a year, so it will save us millions in the Netherlands alone.”

The study included adult ICU patients who were expected not to be extubated for at least 24 hours. Dr. Paulus presented the primary analysis of the study, which included data for 922 patients who were randomized either to the on-demand group (n = 455) or the routine nebulization group (n = 467) and completed follow-up.

Patients assigned to the on-demand group received acetylcysteine-containing solutions if they had thick or tenacious secretions, or salbutamol-containing solutions if wheezing was observed or suspected or when findings were suggestive of lower-airway obstruction, according to the paper, published in JAMA.

 

 

SOURCE: Paulus F et al. (van Meenen DMP et al.) JAMA. 2018 Feb. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0949.

Body

Dr. Eric J. Gartman
Eric Gartman, MD, FCCP, comments: I would not say there is necessarily a standard way people do this, and practice patterns likely vary widely. There are some places where respiratory therapy has wide control of vented patients and often implements protocols, while at other places every vented patient has to have specific orders for things by the providers. I would find it very likely that more patients receive standing bronchodilator therapy than should (thus the reason for the study). Our practice pattern locally mirrors the idea of the study (where a patient's therapy is tailored to the reason for their intubation).

I would suspect local practice patterns with nebulized acytylcysteine to vary even more widely than bronchodilator administration strategies. 

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event
Body

Dr. Eric J. Gartman
Eric Gartman, MD, FCCP, comments: I would not say there is necessarily a standard way people do this, and practice patterns likely vary widely. There are some places where respiratory therapy has wide control of vented patients and often implements protocols, while at other places every vented patient has to have specific orders for things by the providers. I would find it very likely that more patients receive standing bronchodilator therapy than should (thus the reason for the study). Our practice pattern locally mirrors the idea of the study (where a patient's therapy is tailored to the reason for their intubation).

I would suspect local practice patterns with nebulized acytylcysteine to vary even more widely than bronchodilator administration strategies. 

Body

Dr. Eric J. Gartman
Eric Gartman, MD, FCCP, comments: I would not say there is necessarily a standard way people do this, and practice patterns likely vary widely. There are some places where respiratory therapy has wide control of vented patients and often implements protocols, while at other places every vented patient has to have specific orders for things by the providers. I would find it very likely that more patients receive standing bronchodilator therapy than should (thus the reason for the study). Our practice pattern locally mirrors the idea of the study (where a patient's therapy is tailored to the reason for their intubation).

I would suspect local practice patterns with nebulized acytylcysteine to vary even more widely than bronchodilator administration strategies. 

 

Among ICU patients receiving invasive ventilation, on-demand nebulization of acetylcysteine or salbutamol was noninferior to routine nebulization with both medications, according to the results of a randomized clinical trial presented by Frederique Paulus, RN, PhD.

In this study, adverse events such as tachyarrhythmia and agitation were less frequent with the on-demand approach, in which patients receive nebulization based on strict clinical indications, Dr. Paulus reported at the Critical Care Congress sponsored by the Society for Critical Care Medicine. The study was published simultaneously in JAMA.

Andrew Bowser/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Frederique Paulus
“On-demand nebulization was noninferior to routine nebulization, but routine nebulization is associated with more side effects, so we think on-demand nebulization may be a reasonable alternative to routine nebulization,” said Dr. Paulus of the department of intensive care at the Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, during her presentation.

The on-demand approach may also be cost saving, she noted, citing an economic analysis underway that is not yet ready for publication.

“In our ICU, it will save us 350,000 Euros a year,” she said. “In the Netherlands, 40,000 patients will be mechanically ventilated in a year, so it will save us millions in the Netherlands alone.”

The study included adult ICU patients who were expected not to be extubated for at least 24 hours. Dr. Paulus presented the primary analysis of the study, which included data for 922 patients who were randomized either to the on-demand group (n = 455) or the routine nebulization group (n = 467) and completed follow-up.

Patients assigned to the on-demand group received acetylcysteine-containing solutions if they had thick or tenacious secretions, or salbutamol-containing solutions if wheezing was observed or suspected or when findings were suggestive of lower-airway obstruction, according to the paper, published in JAMA.

 

 

SOURCE: Paulus F et al. (van Meenen DMP et al.) JAMA. 2018 Feb. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0949.

 

Among ICU patients receiving invasive ventilation, on-demand nebulization of acetylcysteine or salbutamol was noninferior to routine nebulization with both medications, according to the results of a randomized clinical trial presented by Frederique Paulus, RN, PhD.

In this study, adverse events such as tachyarrhythmia and agitation were less frequent with the on-demand approach, in which patients receive nebulization based on strict clinical indications, Dr. Paulus reported at the Critical Care Congress sponsored by the Society for Critical Care Medicine. The study was published simultaneously in JAMA.

Andrew Bowser/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Frederique Paulus
“On-demand nebulization was noninferior to routine nebulization, but routine nebulization is associated with more side effects, so we think on-demand nebulization may be a reasonable alternative to routine nebulization,” said Dr. Paulus of the department of intensive care at the Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, during her presentation.

The on-demand approach may also be cost saving, she noted, citing an economic analysis underway that is not yet ready for publication.

“In our ICU, it will save us 350,000 Euros a year,” she said. “In the Netherlands, 40,000 patients will be mechanically ventilated in a year, so it will save us millions in the Netherlands alone.”

The study included adult ICU patients who were expected not to be extubated for at least 24 hours. Dr. Paulus presented the primary analysis of the study, which included data for 922 patients who were randomized either to the on-demand group (n = 455) or the routine nebulization group (n = 467) and completed follow-up.

Patients assigned to the on-demand group received acetylcysteine-containing solutions if they had thick or tenacious secretions, or salbutamol-containing solutions if wheezing was observed or suspected or when findings were suggestive of lower-airway obstruction, according to the paper, published in JAMA.

 

 

SOURCE: Paulus F et al. (van Meenen DMP et al.) JAMA. 2018 Feb. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0949.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM CCC47

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Compared with routine nebulization with acetylcysteine or salbutamol, on-demand nebulization with acetylcysteine or salbutamol was noninferior among patients receiving invasive ventilation in the ICU.

Major finding: At day 28, the median number of ventilator-free days was 21 in the on-demand group and 20 in the routine care group.

Data source: Primary analysis of a randomized clinical trial including 922 adult patients who were expected to need at least 24 hours of invasive ventilation at one of seven ICUs in the Netherlands.

Disclosures: Authors reported no conflicts of interest related to the study.

Source: Paulus F et al. (van Meenen DMP et al.) JAMA. 2018 Feb. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0949.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica