Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/02/2019 - 09:08
Display Headline
Do complications muddle NSQIP risk calculator validity?

The American College of Surgeons’ NSQIP surgical risk calculator was effective for evaluating patients at average surgical risk undergoing laparoscopic colectomy at a single institution, but did not accurately predict outcomes in a small percentage of patients when one or more serious complications occurred, a new study has found.

Specifically, the actual length of stay (LOS) was significantly longer than predicted by the calculator (4.22 days vs. 4.11 days; P = .0001), with four outliers with multiple complications having an LOS more than 3 standard deviations from the mean. After removing the outliers, the actual LOS was significantly shorter than that predicted (3.31 days vs. 4.05 days; P = .002). Occurrence of any complication was also significantly lower than predicted (17.3% vs. 19.4%; P = .05).

“Addition of surgeon- and patient-specific data via the American College of Surgeons case-logging system could better adjust for these areas,” study author Dr. Kyle Cologne and his colleagues recommend.

Read the full article at J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2015;220:281-6.

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

The American College of Surgeons’ NSQIP surgical risk calculator was effective for evaluating patients at average surgical risk undergoing laparoscopic colectomy at a single institution, but did not accurately predict outcomes in a small percentage of patients when one or more serious complications occurred, a new study has found.

Specifically, the actual length of stay (LOS) was significantly longer than predicted by the calculator (4.22 days vs. 4.11 days; P = .0001), with four outliers with multiple complications having an LOS more than 3 standard deviations from the mean. After removing the outliers, the actual LOS was significantly shorter than that predicted (3.31 days vs. 4.05 days; P = .002). Occurrence of any complication was also significantly lower than predicted (17.3% vs. 19.4%; P = .05).

“Addition of surgeon- and patient-specific data via the American College of Surgeons case-logging system could better adjust for these areas,” study author Dr. Kyle Cologne and his colleagues recommend.

Read the full article at J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2015;220:281-6.

The American College of Surgeons’ NSQIP surgical risk calculator was effective for evaluating patients at average surgical risk undergoing laparoscopic colectomy at a single institution, but did not accurately predict outcomes in a small percentage of patients when one or more serious complications occurred, a new study has found.

Specifically, the actual length of stay (LOS) was significantly longer than predicted by the calculator (4.22 days vs. 4.11 days; P = .0001), with four outliers with multiple complications having an LOS more than 3 standard deviations from the mean. After removing the outliers, the actual LOS was significantly shorter than that predicted (3.31 days vs. 4.05 days; P = .002). Occurrence of any complication was also significantly lower than predicted (17.3% vs. 19.4%; P = .05).

“Addition of surgeon- and patient-specific data via the American College of Surgeons case-logging system could better adjust for these areas,” study author Dr. Kyle Cologne and his colleagues recommend.

Read the full article at J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2015;220:281-6.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Do complications muddle NSQIP risk calculator validity?
Display Headline
Do complications muddle NSQIP risk calculator validity?
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article