Article Type
Changed
Fri, 09/14/2018 - 11:56

 

Clinical question: How accurate are doctors and nurses at predicting survival and functional outcomes in critically ill patients?

Background: Doctors have been shown to have moderate accuracy at predicting in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients; however, little is known about their ability to predict longer-term outcomes.

Study design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Five medical and surgical ICUs in three hospitals in Philadelphia.

Synopsis: Physicians and nurses predicted survival and functional outcomes for critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation or vasopressors. Outcomes predicted were in-hospital and 6-month mortality and ability to return to original residence, toilet independently, ambulate stairs, remember most things, think clearly, and solve problems.

Six-month follow-up was completed for 299 patients. Accuracy was highest when either physicians or nurses expressed confidence in their predictions; doctors confident in their predications of 6-month survival had a positive likelihood ratio of 33.00 (95% CI, 8.34-130.63). Both doctors and nurses least accurately predicted cognitive function (positive LR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.36-4.12; negative LR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.92 for doctors, positive LR, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.86-2.60; negative LR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.73-1.06 for nurses), while doctors most accurately predicated 6-month mortality (positive LR, 5.91; 95% CI, 3.74-9.32; negative LR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.33-0.52) and nurses most accurately predicted in-hospital mortality (positive LR, 4.71; 95% CI, 2.94-7.56; negative LR, 0.6; 95% CI,0.49-0.75).

Bottom line: Doctors and nurses were better at predicting mortality than they were at predicting cognition, and their predicted outcomes were most accurate when they expressed a high degree of confidence in the predictions.

Citation: Detsky ME, Harhay MO, Bayard DF, et al. Discriminative accuracy of physician and nurse predictions for survival and functional outcomes 6 months after an ICU admission. JAMA. 2017;317(21):2187-95.

Dr. Herscher is assistant professor, division of hospital medicine, Icahn School of Medicine of the Mount Sinai Health System.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Clinical question: How accurate are doctors and nurses at predicting survival and functional outcomes in critically ill patients?

Background: Doctors have been shown to have moderate accuracy at predicting in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients; however, little is known about their ability to predict longer-term outcomes.

Study design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Five medical and surgical ICUs in three hospitals in Philadelphia.

Synopsis: Physicians and nurses predicted survival and functional outcomes for critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation or vasopressors. Outcomes predicted were in-hospital and 6-month mortality and ability to return to original residence, toilet independently, ambulate stairs, remember most things, think clearly, and solve problems.

Six-month follow-up was completed for 299 patients. Accuracy was highest when either physicians or nurses expressed confidence in their predictions; doctors confident in their predications of 6-month survival had a positive likelihood ratio of 33.00 (95% CI, 8.34-130.63). Both doctors and nurses least accurately predicted cognitive function (positive LR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.36-4.12; negative LR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.92 for doctors, positive LR, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.86-2.60; negative LR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.73-1.06 for nurses), while doctors most accurately predicated 6-month mortality (positive LR, 5.91; 95% CI, 3.74-9.32; negative LR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.33-0.52) and nurses most accurately predicted in-hospital mortality (positive LR, 4.71; 95% CI, 2.94-7.56; negative LR, 0.6; 95% CI,0.49-0.75).

Bottom line: Doctors and nurses were better at predicting mortality than they were at predicting cognition, and their predicted outcomes were most accurate when they expressed a high degree of confidence in the predictions.

Citation: Detsky ME, Harhay MO, Bayard DF, et al. Discriminative accuracy of physician and nurse predictions for survival and functional outcomes 6 months after an ICU admission. JAMA. 2017;317(21):2187-95.

Dr. Herscher is assistant professor, division of hospital medicine, Icahn School of Medicine of the Mount Sinai Health System.

 

Clinical question: How accurate are doctors and nurses at predicting survival and functional outcomes in critically ill patients?

Background: Doctors have been shown to have moderate accuracy at predicting in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients; however, little is known about their ability to predict longer-term outcomes.

Study design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Five medical and surgical ICUs in three hospitals in Philadelphia.

Synopsis: Physicians and nurses predicted survival and functional outcomes for critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation or vasopressors. Outcomes predicted were in-hospital and 6-month mortality and ability to return to original residence, toilet independently, ambulate stairs, remember most things, think clearly, and solve problems.

Six-month follow-up was completed for 299 patients. Accuracy was highest when either physicians or nurses expressed confidence in their predictions; doctors confident in their predications of 6-month survival had a positive likelihood ratio of 33.00 (95% CI, 8.34-130.63). Both doctors and nurses least accurately predicted cognitive function (positive LR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.36-4.12; negative LR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.92 for doctors, positive LR, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.86-2.60; negative LR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.73-1.06 for nurses), while doctors most accurately predicated 6-month mortality (positive LR, 5.91; 95% CI, 3.74-9.32; negative LR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.33-0.52) and nurses most accurately predicted in-hospital mortality (positive LR, 4.71; 95% CI, 2.94-7.56; negative LR, 0.6; 95% CI,0.49-0.75).

Bottom line: Doctors and nurses were better at predicting mortality than they were at predicting cognition, and their predicted outcomes were most accurate when they expressed a high degree of confidence in the predictions.

Citation: Detsky ME, Harhay MO, Bayard DF, et al. Discriminative accuracy of physician and nurse predictions for survival and functional outcomes 6 months after an ICU admission. JAMA. 2017;317(21):2187-95.

Dr. Herscher is assistant professor, division of hospital medicine, Icahn School of Medicine of the Mount Sinai Health System.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default