Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/13/2016 - 10:27
Display Headline
February 2016 Quiz 1

Q1: ANSWER: C

Critique

The diagnosis of H. pylori may be made using either invasive or noninvasive methods. Invasive diagnostic methods either detect organisms directly (i.e., histological identification with appropriate stains or bacterial culture) or indirectly (i.e., rapid urease testing of biopsy specimens). Noninvasive methods include serum antibody, stool antigen, and detecting the metabolites of the bacterial enzyme urease (i.e., urea breath testing). It should be noted that serology should not be used to test for eradication as the antibodies may remain elevated for years after successful eradication therapy.

Treatment of H. pylori infection has become problematic recently primarily due to increasing antibiotic resistance. The eradication rate of standard triple therapy consisting of a proton pump inhibitor combined with clarithromycin (500 mg) and amoxicillin (1 g) (or metronidazole (500 mg), all given b.i.d. for 7-14 days has now declined to unacceptable levels, averaging 70%-80% but reported as low as 55%. It is currently recommended that a noninvasive method be used (other than serology) to confirm eradication in patients in whom eradication is deemed necessary.

References

  1. Malfertheiner P., Megraud F., O’Morain C.A., et al. European Helicobacter Study Group. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection – the Maastricht IV/ Florence Consensus Report. Gut 2012;61:646-64.
  2. De F., Giorgio F., Hassan C., et al. Worldwide H. pylori antibiotic resistance: a systematic review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2010;19:409-14.
  3. Kearney D.J., Brousal A.. Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in clinical practice in the United States – Results from 224 patients. Dig Dis Sci. 2000;45:265-71.

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Q1: ANSWER: C

Critique

The diagnosis of H. pylori may be made using either invasive or noninvasive methods. Invasive diagnostic methods either detect organisms directly (i.e., histological identification with appropriate stains or bacterial culture) or indirectly (i.e., rapid urease testing of biopsy specimens). Noninvasive methods include serum antibody, stool antigen, and detecting the metabolites of the bacterial enzyme urease (i.e., urea breath testing). It should be noted that serology should not be used to test for eradication as the antibodies may remain elevated for years after successful eradication therapy.

Treatment of H. pylori infection has become problematic recently primarily due to increasing antibiotic resistance. The eradication rate of standard triple therapy consisting of a proton pump inhibitor combined with clarithromycin (500 mg) and amoxicillin (1 g) (or metronidazole (500 mg), all given b.i.d. for 7-14 days has now declined to unacceptable levels, averaging 70%-80% but reported as low as 55%. It is currently recommended that a noninvasive method be used (other than serology) to confirm eradication in patients in whom eradication is deemed necessary.

References

  1. Malfertheiner P., Megraud F., O’Morain C.A., et al. European Helicobacter Study Group. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection – the Maastricht IV/ Florence Consensus Report. Gut 2012;61:646-64.
  2. De F., Giorgio F., Hassan C., et al. Worldwide H. pylori antibiotic resistance: a systematic review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2010;19:409-14.
  3. Kearney D.J., Brousal A.. Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in clinical practice in the United States – Results from 224 patients. Dig Dis Sci. 2000;45:265-71.

Q1: ANSWER: C

Critique

The diagnosis of H. pylori may be made using either invasive or noninvasive methods. Invasive diagnostic methods either detect organisms directly (i.e., histological identification with appropriate stains or bacterial culture) or indirectly (i.e., rapid urease testing of biopsy specimens). Noninvasive methods include serum antibody, stool antigen, and detecting the metabolites of the bacterial enzyme urease (i.e., urea breath testing). It should be noted that serology should not be used to test for eradication as the antibodies may remain elevated for years after successful eradication therapy.

Treatment of H. pylori infection has become problematic recently primarily due to increasing antibiotic resistance. The eradication rate of standard triple therapy consisting of a proton pump inhibitor combined with clarithromycin (500 mg) and amoxicillin (1 g) (or metronidazole (500 mg), all given b.i.d. for 7-14 days has now declined to unacceptable levels, averaging 70%-80% but reported as low as 55%. It is currently recommended that a noninvasive method be used (other than serology) to confirm eradication in patients in whom eradication is deemed necessary.

References

  1. Malfertheiner P., Megraud F., O’Morain C.A., et al. European Helicobacter Study Group. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection – the Maastricht IV/ Florence Consensus Report. Gut 2012;61:646-64.
  2. De F., Giorgio F., Hassan C., et al. Worldwide H. pylori antibiotic resistance: a systematic review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2010;19:409-14.
  3. Kearney D.J., Brousal A.. Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in clinical practice in the United States – Results from 224 patients. Dig Dis Sci. 2000;45:265-71.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
February 2016 Quiz 1
Display Headline
February 2016 Quiz 1
Sections
Questionnaire Body
A 38-year-old patient is referred to you from a family practitioner to recommend an antibiotic regimen for retreating Helicobacter pylori. The patient is currently asymptomatic but has a history of peptic ulcer disease. The patient was treated with an H. pylori eradication regimen (proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin) but now has a positive H. pylori serological test. What is the most appropriate next step?
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article