Patient Care

Criteria for Appropriate Use of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters


 

Clinical question: What are criteria for appropriate and inappropriate use of PICCs?

Background: PICCs are commonly used in medical care in a variety of clinical contexts; however, criteria defining the appropriate use of PICCs and practices related to PICC placement have not been previously established.

Study design: A multispecialty panel classified indications for PICC use as appropriate or inappropriate using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method.

Synopsis: Selected appropriate PICC uses include:

    • Infusion of peripherally compatible infusates, intermittent infusions, or infrequent phlebotomy in patients with poor or difficult venous access when the expected duration of use is at least six days;
    • Phlebotomy at least every eight hours when the expected duration of use is at least six days; and
    • Invasive hemodynamic monitoring in a critically ill patient only if the duration of use is expected to exceed 15 days.

      Selected appropriate PICC-related practices:

    • Verify PICC tip position using a chest radiograph only after non-ECG or non-fluoroscopically guided PICC insertion;
    • Provide an interval without a PICC to allow resolution of bacteremia when managing PICC-related bloodstream infections; and
    • For PICC-related DVT, provide at least three months of systemic anticoagulation if not otherwise contraindicated.

Selected inappropriate PICC-related practices:

  • Adjustment of PICC tips that reside in the lower third of the superior vena cava, cavoatrial junction, or right atrium; and
  • Removal or replacement of PICCs that are clinically necessary, well positioned, and functional in the setting of PICC-related DVT or without evidence of catheter-associated bloodstream infection.

Bottom line: A multispecialty expert panel provides guidance for appropriate use of PICCs and PICC-related practices.

Citation: Chopra V, Flanders SA, Saint S, et al. The Michigan appropriateness guide for intravenous catheters (MAGIC): results from a multispecialty panel using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(6):S1-S40.

Recommended Reading

New SHM Members – January 2016
The Hospitalist
Parental Perceptions of Nighttime Communication Are Strong Predictors of Patient Experience
The Hospitalist
Changes to Healthcare that Hospitalists Should Expect in 2016
The Hospitalist
Concerns Grow as Top Clinicians Choose Nonclinical Roles
The Hospitalist
Hospitalists Can Lend Expertise, Join SHM's Campaign to Improve Antibiotic Stewardship
The Hospitalist
ACP Guidelines for Evaluation of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
The Hospitalist
Early Palliative Care Can Save Money
The Hospitalist
Effectiveness of Antipsychotics in Treatment of Delirium
The Hospitalist
Predictors for Surgical Management of Small Bowel Obstruction
The Hospitalist
Adding Advanced Molecular Techniques to Standard Blood Cultures May Improve Patient Outcomes
The Hospitalist
   Comments ()