Patient Care

ACP Guidelines for Evaluation of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism


Clinical question: What are best practices for evaluating patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE)?

Background: Use of CT in the evaluation of PE has increased across all clinical settings without improving mortality. Contrast CT carries the risks of radiation exposure, contrast-induced nephropathy, and incidental findings that require further investigation. The authors highlight evidence-based strategies for evaluation of PE, focusing on delivering high-value care.

Study design: Clinical guideline.

Setting: Literature review of studies across all adult clinical settings.

Synopsis: The clinical guidelines committee of the American College of Physicians conducted a literature search surrounding evaluation of suspected acute PE. From their review, they concluded:

  • Pretest probability should initially be determined based on validated prediction tools (Wells score, Revised Geneva);
  • In patients found to have low pretest probability and meeting the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC), clinicians can forego d-dimer testing;
  • In those with intermediate pretest probability or those with low pre-test probability who do not pass PERC, d-dimer measurement should be obtained;
  • The d-dimer threshold should be age adjusted and imaging should not be pursued in patients whose d-dimer level falls below this cutoff, while those with positive d-dimers should receive CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA); and
  • Patients with high pretest probability should undergo CTPA (or V/Q scan if CTPA is contraindicated) without d-dimer testing.

Bottom line: In suspected acute PE, first determine pretest probability using Wells and Revised Geneva, and then use this probability in conjunction with the PERC and d-dimer (as indicated) to guide decisions about imaging.

Citation: Raja AS, Greenberg JO, Qaseem A, Denberg TD, Fitterman N, Schuur JD. Evaluation of patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism: best practice advice from the clinical guidelines committee of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(9):701-711.

Recommended Reading

New SHM Members – January 2016
The Hospitalist
Parental Perceptions of Nighttime Communication Are Strong Predictors of Patient Experience
The Hospitalist
Changes to Healthcare that Hospitalists Should Expect in 2016
The Hospitalist
Concerns Grow as Top Clinicians Choose Nonclinical Roles
The Hospitalist
Hospitalists Can Lend Expertise, Join SHM's Campaign to Improve Antibiotic Stewardship
The Hospitalist
Early Palliative Care Can Save Money
The Hospitalist
Effectiveness of Antipsychotics in Treatment of Delirium
The Hospitalist
Predictors for Surgical Management of Small Bowel Obstruction
The Hospitalist
A Look at Speakers, Educational Tracks Planned for Hospital Medicine 2016
The Hospitalist
Adding Advanced Molecular Techniques to Standard Blood Cultures May Improve Patient Outcomes
The Hospitalist
   Comments ()