Patient Care

Predictors for Surgical Management of Small Bowel Obstruction


Clinical question: Are there clinical or computerized tomography (CT) findings that identify which patients will need early surgical management in adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO)?

Background: Previous studies determined adverse outcomes resulting from delayed surgery in patients with ASBO: increased length of stay (LOS), complications, and mortality. Most patients respond to nonoperative management, however.

Study design: Prospective observational study.

Setting: Three academic and tertiary referral medical centers.

Synopsis: Using multivariate analysis of 202 patients admitted with presumed adhesive ASBO without immediate surgical need, of whom 52 required eventual surgical intervention, this study found three predictors for needing operative care: no flatus (odds ratio [OR], 3.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.51-7.12; P=0.003), as well as the CT findings of a high-grade obstruction, defined as only minimal passage of air and fluid into the distal small bowel or colon (OR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.10-5.43; P=0.028) or the presence of free fluid (OR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.13-5.90; P=0.023).

Despite these associations, clinicians should not view these findings as indications for surgery. Of the patients who responded to nonoperative management, one-third had no flatus, and on CT one-third had high-grade obstruction and half had free fluid. Instead, because patients with these findings are at an increased risk of failing nonoperative management, they should be observed more closely and reassessed more frequently.

Bottom line: Patients without flatus or with the presence of free fluid or high-grade obstruction on CT are at an increased risk of requiring surgical management for ASBO.

Citation: Kulvatunyou N, Pandit V, Moutamn S, et al. A multi-institution prospective observational study of small bowel obstruction: clinical and computerized tomography predictors of which patients may require early surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79(3):393-398.

Short Take

Central Line Insertion Site Matters When It Comes to Complications

Adults randomly assigned to subclavian insertion had lower associated risk of bloodstream infection and symptomatic thrombosis compared to femoral and jugular vein insertion but had higher risk of pneumothorax.

Citation: Parienti JJ, Mongardon N, Mégarbane B, et al. Intravascular complications of central venous catheterization by insertion site. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(13):1220-1229.

Recommended Reading

Press Ganey Executive Urges Physicians to Embrace Hospital Medicine Care Model
The Hospitalist
A Look at Speakers, Educational Tracks Planned for Hospital Medicine 2016
The Hospitalist
Adding Advanced Molecular Techniques to Standard Blood Cultures May Improve Patient Outcomes
The Hospitalist
Where Leading GOP Presidential Candidates Stand on Health Policies
The Hospitalist
Some Readmission Risk Factors Not Captured by Medicare
The Hospitalist
Listen Now: Patient Satisfaction Changes Related to Hospital Renovation
The Hospitalist
Leadership Academy ‘Hits Nail on the Head’
The Hospitalist
Team Hospitalist Advisory Board Accepting Applications for 2016-2018 Terms
The Hospitalist
Methylphenidate Linked to Sleep and Appetite Loss
The Hospitalist
Stent Thrombosis Risk Linked to Bioresorbable Scaffold
The Hospitalist
   Comments ()