From the Society

Sneak Peek: The Hospital Leader blog - July 2017

It’s time to pay more attention to those Joint Commission inspections


“We Are Not Done Changing”

Recently, the online version of JAMA published an original investigation titled, “Patient Mortality During Unannounced Accreditation Surveys at US Hospitals.” The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effect of heightened vigilance during unannounced accreditation surveys on safety and quality of inpatient care.

The authors found that there was a significant reduction in mortality in patients admitted during the week of surveys by The Joint Commission. The change was more significant in major teaching hospitals, where mortality fell from 6.41% to 5.93% during survey weeks, a 5.9% relative decrease. The positive effects of being monitored have been well documented in all kinds of arenas, such as hand washing and antibiotic stewardship. But mortality?

Tracy Cardin, ACNP-BC, SFHM, a nurse practitioner in the Section of Hospital Medicine at the University of Chicago

Tracy Cardin

This is an interesting outcome, especially considering a recent ordeal I went through with my dear sister-in-law. She was on vacation in a somewhat remote location and suffers from a chronic illness that requires her to have a tunneled line through which she receives nocturnal TPN. She presented with high fever and rigors, septic, with a Klebsiella bacteremia. Though I was reassured somewhat by the words “sepsis protocol” used by the hospital staff, I was utterly dismayed when the hospitalist continued to use her line, even though the culture from the line was positive and she continued to spike fevers and develop rigors whenever the line was accessed.

Overall, I feel like I’m a reasonable person, but the clear lack of interest – or willingness to consider that this might not be a good idea on the part of the hospitalist in charge – incited a certain amount of anger and disbelief in me. She also received an antibiotic that she had a documented allergy to – a clear medical error. I instructed my sis-in-law to refuse access to the line; it was removed, and she ultimately recovered to discharge.

This brings me back to the JAMA study. It’s easy to perceive unannounced inspections as merely an inconvenience, where things are locked up that normally aren’t, or where that coveted cup of coffee you normally bring on rounds to get you through your day is summarily yanked out of your hand.

Read the full text of this blog post at

Also on The Hospital Leader

How Often Do You Ask This (Ineffective) Question? by Brad Flansbaum, DO, MPH, MHMBuilding a Practice that People Want to Be a Part Of by Leslie Flores, MHAA Need for Medicare Appeals Process Reform in Hospital Observation Care by Anne Sheehy, MD, MS, FHM

Recommended Reading

A case for building our leadership skills
The Hospitalist
Will artificial intelligence make us better doctors?
The Hospitalist
Scheduling patterns: Time for a change?
The Hospitalist
Committee and chapter involvement allows SHM member to give back
The Hospitalist
New SHM Members – February/March 2017
The Hospitalist
Hospitalists and cost control in the U.S. health care system
The Hospitalist
Hospitalist meta-leader: Your new mission has arrived
The Hospitalist
Hospitalist movers and shakers - June/July 2017
The Hospitalist
Meet the two newest SHM board members
The Hospitalist
Everything We Say and Do: Take time to leave a good impression
The Hospitalist
   Comments ()