Clinical

Noninvasive cardiac testing to rule out acute coronary syndromes provides no benefit in low-risk chest pain patients


 

Background: The 2014 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association clinical guideline includes a recommendation for noninvasive testing (exercise test or coronary commuted tomographic angiography [CCTA]) in patients with chest pain but no evidence of ischemia. The ROMICAT-II (Rule Out Myocardial Ischemia/Infarction by Computer Assisted Tomography) trial randomized 1,000 ED patients with chest pain to undergo CCTA or usual care with unknown benefits and risks of this testing recommendation. The question of whether this testing may be omitted is addressed in secondary analysis.

Study design: Retrospective analysis of the ROMICAT-II trial data.

Setting: Emergency department.

Synopsis: As compared with 882 patients who underwent noninvasive testing, 118 patients in the ROMICAT-II usual care group who did not undergo noninvasive testing had shorter lengths of stay (20.3 vs. 27.9 hours; P less than .001), lower rates of diagnostic testing (P less than .001), angiography (2% vs. 11%; P less than .001), and lower costs ($2,261.50 vs. $2,584.30). There was no difference in percutaneous coronary intervention (2% vs. 5%; P = .15), coronary artery bypass surgery (0% vs. 1%; P = .61), major adverse cardiac events (MACE; 2% vs. 1%; P = .24), or return ED visits (5.8% vs. 2.8%; P = .08) during the 28-day follow-up period. These findings suggest noninvasive cardiac testing may be omitted in low- to intermediate-risk patients presenting with chest pain. However, this study was not designed or powered to address this question and patients were not randomized. These data may support hospitalists who choose not to order noninvasive testing in ED patients with chest pain.

Bottom line: In this secondary analysis of ROMICAT-II clinical trial data, patients who underwent clinical evaluation without noninvasive testing had shorter length of stay, less diagnostic testing, lower radiation exposure, and reduced costs with no difference in missed diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes, development of MACE, or return ED visits.

Citation: Reinhardt SW et al. Noninvasive cardiac testing vs. clinical evaluation alone in acute chest pain: A secondary analysis of the ROMICAT-II randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Feb 1;178(2):212-9.

Dr. Moulder is assistant professor, University of Virginia Health System.

Recommended Reading

Short Takes
The Hospitalist
Simvastatin, atorvastatin cut mortality risk for sepsis patients
The Hospitalist
Risk of ED visit/hospitalization increases when brand-name angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are switched to generic versions
The Hospitalist
The ‘holy grail’ of thrombosis prevention
The Hospitalist
From #MeToo to troponins: Updates in hospital medicine
The Hospitalist
Common infections are potent risk factor for MI, stroke
The Hospitalist
High 5-year mortality in patients admitted with heart failure regardless of ejection fraction
The Hospitalist
24-hour ambulatory BP measurements strongly predict mortality
The Hospitalist
Impaired kidney function no problem for dabigatran reversal
The Hospitalist
Lower risk of ICH with dabigatran as compared to warfarin in atrial fibrillation
The Hospitalist
   Comments ()