Latest News

Report urges complete residency overhaul


The transition from undergraduate medical education (UME) to graduate medical education in the United States needs comprehensive reform, says a new report from the Graduate Medical Education Review Committee (UGRC) of the Coalition for Physician Accountability.

The 275-page report presents preliminary findings that were released in April 2021 and a long list of stakeholder comments. According to the report, the coalition will meet soon to discuss the final recommendations and consider next steps toward implementation.

The UGRC includes representatives of national medical organizations, medical schools, and residency programs. Among the organizations that participated in the report’s creation are the American Medical Association, the National Board of Medical Examiners, the American Osteopathic Association, the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners, the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates, and the Association of American Medical Colleges.

The report identifies a list of challenges that affect the transition of medical students into residency programs and beyond. They include:

  • Too much focus on finding and filling residency positions instead of “assuring learner competence and readiness for residency training”
  • Inattention to assuring congruence between applicant goals and program missions
  • Overreliance on licensure exam scores rather than “valid, trustworthy measures of students’ competence and clinical abilities”
  • Increasing financial costs to students
  • Individual and systemic biases in the UME-GME transition, as well as inequities related to international medical graduates

Seeking a common framework for competence

Overall, the report calls for increased standardization of how students are evaluated in medical school and how residency programs evaluate students. Less reliance should be placed on the numerical scores of the U.S. Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE), the report says, and more attention should be paid to the direct observation of student performance in clinical situations. In addition, the various organizations involved in the UME-GME transition process are asked to work better together.

To develop better methods of evaluating medical students and residents, UME and GME educators should jointly define and implement a common framework and set of competencies to apply to learners across the UME-GME transition, the report suggests.

While emphasizing the need for a broader student assessment framework, the report says, USMLE scores should also continue to be used in judging residency applicants. “Assessment information should be shared in residency applications and a postmatch learner handover. Licensing examinations should be used for their intended purpose to ensure requisite competence.”

Among the committee’s three dozen recommendations are the following:

  • The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services should change the GME funding structure so that the initial residency period is calculated starting with the second year of postgraduate training. This change would allow residents to reconsider their career choices. Currently, if a resident decides to switch to another program or specialty after beginning training, the hospital may not receive full GME funding, so may be less likely to approve the change.
  • Residency programs should improve recruitment practices to increase specialty-specific diversity of residents. Medical educators should also receive additional training regarding antiracism, avoiding bias, and ensuring equity.
  • The self-reported demographic information of applicants to residency programs should be measured and shared with stakeholders, including the programs and medical schools, to promote equity. “A residency program that finds bias in its selection process could go back in real time to find qualified applicants who may have been missed, potentially improving outcomes,” the report notes.
  • An interactive database of GME program and specialty track information should be created and made available to all applicants, medical schools, and residency programs at no cost to applicants. “Applicants and their advisors should be able to sort the information according to demographic and educational features that may significantly impact the likelihood of matching at a program.”


Recommended Reading

COVID-19 death toll higher for international medical graduates
The Hospitalist
U.S. News releases Best Children’s Hospitals list, with changes
The Hospitalist
Incorporating self-care, wellness into routines can prevent doctors’ burnout
The Hospitalist
Supreme Court upholds Affordable Care Act
The Hospitalist
High rates of work-related trauma, PTSD in intern physicians
The Hospitalist
Bullying in academic medicine rife, underreported
The Hospitalist
Direct oral anticoagulants: Competition brought no cost relief
The Hospitalist
Mental illness admissions: 18-44 is the age of prevalence
The Hospitalist
Docs fight back after losing hospital privileges, patients, and income
The Hospitalist
Pandemic demand for NPs soars, softens for primary care: Report
The Hospitalist
   Comments ()