Clinical Edge Journal Scan

Key clinical point: Probiotic supplementation reduced the clinical severity of atopic dermatitis (AD) and improved the quality of life (QoL) in adults with AD compared with control intervention.

Major finding: Probiotic vs. control intervention significantly reduced the clinical severity of AD in both the short-term (standard mean difference [SMD] 0.63; P = .04) and long-term (SMD 1.57; P < .001) and significantly improved the long-term QoL (SMD 0.74; P < .001), with a mixture of Lactobacillus salivarius and Bifidobacterium being the best supplementation for both short- and long-term outcomes (surface under the cumulative ranking 95.2%).

Study details: Finding are from a meta-analysis of nine studies including 402 adults who received probiotic supplementation (patients with AD; n = 208) or placebo or standard treatment only (control individuals; n = 194).

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Medical and Health Research Project of China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Li Y et al. The efficacy of probiotics supplementation for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022 (Jun 7). Doi: 10.1080/09546634.2022.2080170

Key clinical point: Probiotic supplementation reduced the clinical severity of atopic dermatitis (AD) and improved the quality of life (QoL) in adults with AD compared with control intervention.

Major finding: Probiotic vs. control intervention significantly reduced the clinical severity of AD in both the short-term (standard mean difference [SMD] 0.63; P = .04) and long-term (SMD 1.57; P < .001) and significantly improved the long-term QoL (SMD 0.74; P < .001), with a mixture of Lactobacillus salivarius and Bifidobacterium being the best supplementation for both short- and long-term outcomes (surface under the cumulative ranking 95.2%).

Study details: Finding are from a meta-analysis of nine studies including 402 adults who received probiotic supplementation (patients with AD; n = 208) or placebo or standard treatment only (control individuals; n = 194).

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Medical and Health Research Project of China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Li Y et al. The efficacy of probiotics supplementation for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022 (Jun 7). Doi: 10.1080/09546634.2022.2080170

Key clinical point: Probiotic supplementation reduced the clinical severity of atopic dermatitis (AD) and improved the quality of life (QoL) in adults with AD compared with control intervention.

Major finding: Probiotic vs. control intervention significantly reduced the clinical severity of AD in both the short-term (standard mean difference [SMD] 0.63; P = .04) and long-term (SMD 1.57; P < .001) and significantly improved the long-term QoL (SMD 0.74; P < .001), with a mixture of Lactobacillus salivarius and Bifidobacterium being the best supplementation for both short- and long-term outcomes (surface under the cumulative ranking 95.2%).

Study details: Finding are from a meta-analysis of nine studies including 402 adults who received probiotic supplementation (patients with AD; n = 208) or placebo or standard treatment only (control individuals; n = 194).

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Medical and Health Research Project of China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Li Y et al. The efficacy of probiotics supplementation for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022 (Jun 7). Doi: 10.1080/09546634.2022.2080170

Key clinical point: Children born to mothers who received probiotics vs. placebo during gestation or 1 year after childbirth showed a lower risk for infantile atopic dermatitis (AD), but a similar risk for immunoglobulin E (IgE)-associated infantile AD or sensitive constitution.

Major finding: Children born to mothers in the probiotics vs. placebo group showed a lower risk for infantile AD (risk ratio [RR] 0.86; 95% CI 0.78-0.95), although the risk for IgE-associated infantile AD (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.79-1.22) or sensitive constitution (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.81-1.08) was similar between both the treatment groups.

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled trials including 2575 infants born to mothers who received probiotics or placebo during gestation or 1 year after birth.

Disclosures: This study did not report any source of funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Pan H, Su J. Association of probiotics with atopic dermatitis among infant: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022;2022:5080190 (May 23). Doi: 10.1155/2022/5080190

Key clinical point: Children born to mothers who received probiotics vs. placebo during gestation or 1 year after childbirth showed a lower risk for infantile atopic dermatitis (AD), but a similar risk for immunoglobulin E (IgE)-associated infantile AD or sensitive constitution.

Major finding: Children born to mothers in the probiotics vs. placebo group showed a lower risk for infantile AD (risk ratio [RR] 0.86; 95% CI 0.78-0.95), although the risk for IgE-associated infantile AD (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.79-1.22) or sensitive constitution (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.81-1.08) was similar between both the treatment groups.

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled trials including 2575 infants born to mothers who received probiotics or placebo during gestation or 1 year after birth.

Disclosures: This study did not report any source of funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Pan H, Su J. Association of probiotics with atopic dermatitis among infant: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022;2022:5080190 (May 23). Doi: 10.1155/2022/5080190

Key clinical point: Children born to mothers who received probiotics vs. placebo during gestation or 1 year after childbirth showed a lower risk for infantile atopic dermatitis (AD), but a similar risk for immunoglobulin E (IgE)-associated infantile AD or sensitive constitution.

Major finding: Children born to mothers in the probiotics vs. placebo group showed a lower risk for infantile AD (risk ratio [RR] 0.86; 95% CI 0.78-0.95), although the risk for IgE-associated infantile AD (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.79-1.22) or sensitive constitution (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.81-1.08) was similar between both the treatment groups.

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled trials including 2575 infants born to mothers who received probiotics or placebo during gestation or 1 year after birth.

Disclosures: This study did not report any source of funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Pan H, Su J. Association of probiotics with atopic dermatitis among infant: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022;2022:5080190 (May 23). Doi: 10.1155/2022/5080190

Key clinical point: Dupilumab led to clinically meaningful improvements in atopic dermatitis (AD) severity, extent, and itch severity in a real-world population of adults with moderate-to-severe AD.

Major finding: At 4 months, the Investigator’s Global Assessment score reduced by ≥1 point in 81.8% of patients and by ≥2 points in 62.8% of patients. Additionally, at 4 months, the mean itch severity score and affected body surface area reduced from 7.0 to 2.8 and from 39.3% to 16.3% (both P < .0001), respectively, with improvements being significant regardless of age, sex, or treatment history (all P < .0001).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective, observational study based on electronic medical records of adults with moderate-to-severe AD who were evaluated at 4 months after initiating dupilumab.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Sanofi. Four authors declared being current or former employees and stockholders of Sanofi or Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. The other authors declared ties with various sources, including Regeneron and Sanofi.

Source: Eichenfield LF et al. Real-world effectiveness of dupilumab in atopic dermatitis patients: Analysis of an electronic medical records dataset. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 (May 11). Doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00731-z

Key clinical point: Dupilumab led to clinically meaningful improvements in atopic dermatitis (AD) severity, extent, and itch severity in a real-world population of adults with moderate-to-severe AD.

Major finding: At 4 months, the Investigator’s Global Assessment score reduced by ≥1 point in 81.8% of patients and by ≥2 points in 62.8% of patients. Additionally, at 4 months, the mean itch severity score and affected body surface area reduced from 7.0 to 2.8 and from 39.3% to 16.3% (both P < .0001), respectively, with improvements being significant regardless of age, sex, or treatment history (all P < .0001).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective, observational study based on electronic medical records of adults with moderate-to-severe AD who were evaluated at 4 months after initiating dupilumab.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Sanofi. Four authors declared being current or former employees and stockholders of Sanofi or Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. The other authors declared ties with various sources, including Regeneron and Sanofi.

Source: Eichenfield LF et al. Real-world effectiveness of dupilumab in atopic dermatitis patients: Analysis of an electronic medical records dataset. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 (May 11). Doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00731-z

Key clinical point: Dupilumab led to clinically meaningful improvements in atopic dermatitis (AD) severity, extent, and itch severity in a real-world population of adults with moderate-to-severe AD.

Major finding: At 4 months, the Investigator’s Global Assessment score reduced by ≥1 point in 81.8% of patients and by ≥2 points in 62.8% of patients. Additionally, at 4 months, the mean itch severity score and affected body surface area reduced from 7.0 to 2.8 and from 39.3% to 16.3% (both P < .0001), respectively, with improvements being significant regardless of age, sex, or treatment history (all P < .0001).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective, observational study based on electronic medical records of adults with moderate-to-severe AD who were evaluated at 4 months after initiating dupilumab.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Sanofi. Four authors declared being current or former employees and stockholders of Sanofi or Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. The other authors declared ties with various sources, including Regeneron and Sanofi.

Source: Eichenfield LF et al. Real-world effectiveness of dupilumab in atopic dermatitis patients: Analysis of an electronic medical records dataset. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 (May 11). Doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00731-z

Key clinical point: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) experience a fluctuation in depression severity over time, with the likelihood of experiencing depressive symptoms being the highest in patients with severe AD.

Major finding: Among patients with ≥2 follow-up visits, most (49.46%) experienced a fluctuation in depression severity, whereas 45.65% experienced a persistent severity of depression. High Eczema Area Severity Index (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 7.622; 95% CI 3.881-14.968) and itch (aOR 14.745; 95% CI 4.696-46.297) scores were strongly associated with difficulty in concentrating over time.

Study details: Findings are from a longitudinal, dermatology practice-based study including 695 adults with AD who were evaluated at baseline and at every 6-month follow-up visits.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the Dermatology Foundation, and Galderma. R Chavda and S Gabriel declared being employees of Galderma, and JI Silverberg declared serving as a consultant for Galderma.

Source: Chatrath S et al. Longitudinal course and predictors of depressive symptoms in atopic dermatitis.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022 (May 9). Doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.04.061

Key clinical point: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) experience a fluctuation in depression severity over time, with the likelihood of experiencing depressive symptoms being the highest in patients with severe AD.

Major finding: Among patients with ≥2 follow-up visits, most (49.46%) experienced a fluctuation in depression severity, whereas 45.65% experienced a persistent severity of depression. High Eczema Area Severity Index (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 7.622; 95% CI 3.881-14.968) and itch (aOR 14.745; 95% CI 4.696-46.297) scores were strongly associated with difficulty in concentrating over time.

Study details: Findings are from a longitudinal, dermatology practice-based study including 695 adults with AD who were evaluated at baseline and at every 6-month follow-up visits.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the Dermatology Foundation, and Galderma. R Chavda and S Gabriel declared being employees of Galderma, and JI Silverberg declared serving as a consultant for Galderma.

Source: Chatrath S et al. Longitudinal course and predictors of depressive symptoms in atopic dermatitis.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022 (May 9). Doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.04.061

Key clinical point: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) experience a fluctuation in depression severity over time, with the likelihood of experiencing depressive symptoms being the highest in patients with severe AD.

Major finding: Among patients with ≥2 follow-up visits, most (49.46%) experienced a fluctuation in depression severity, whereas 45.65% experienced a persistent severity of depression. High Eczema Area Severity Index (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 7.622; 95% CI 3.881-14.968) and itch (aOR 14.745; 95% CI 4.696-46.297) scores were strongly associated with difficulty in concentrating over time.

Study details: Findings are from a longitudinal, dermatology practice-based study including 695 adults with AD who were evaluated at baseline and at every 6-month follow-up visits.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the Dermatology Foundation, and Galderma. R Chavda and S Gabriel declared being employees of Galderma, and JI Silverberg declared serving as a consultant for Galderma.

Source: Chatrath S et al. Longitudinal course and predictors of depressive symptoms in atopic dermatitis.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022 (May 9). Doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.04.061

Key clinical point: Baricitinib vs. dupilumab demonstrated similar efficacy in reducing atopic dermatitis (AD) severity and improving quality of life (QoL), with more rapid improvement in itch.

Major finding: A dose of 4 mg baricitinib vs. dupilumab as monotherapy or with topical corticosteroids (TCS) was more likely to show ≥4-point improvement in itch scores at 4 weeks among patients with inadequate response or intolerance to topical treatments (dupliumab: relative risk [RR] 2.62; P = .013; TCS: RR 2.16; P = .029). However, both drugs showed similar efficacy across Eczema Area and Severity Index 75, itch, and QoL scores at 16 weeks.

Study details: This data comes from an indirect treatment comparison analysis of nine placebo-controlled trials included 3364 adults with moderate-to-severe AD and inadequate response or intolerance to topical treatments or cyclosporine who received dupilumab ± TCS or baricitinib ± TCS.

Disclosures: This study was supported by Eli Lilly and Company. Five authors declared being employees or shareholders of Eli Lilly. The other authors reported ties with various sources, including Eli Lilly.

Source: de Bruin-Weller MS et al. Indirect treatment comparison of baricitinib versus dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 (May 11). Doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00734-w

Key clinical point: Baricitinib vs. dupilumab demonstrated similar efficacy in reducing atopic dermatitis (AD) severity and improving quality of life (QoL), with more rapid improvement in itch.

Major finding: A dose of 4 mg baricitinib vs. dupilumab as monotherapy or with topical corticosteroids (TCS) was more likely to show ≥4-point improvement in itch scores at 4 weeks among patients with inadequate response or intolerance to topical treatments (dupliumab: relative risk [RR] 2.62; P = .013; TCS: RR 2.16; P = .029). However, both drugs showed similar efficacy across Eczema Area and Severity Index 75, itch, and QoL scores at 16 weeks.

Study details: This data comes from an indirect treatment comparison analysis of nine placebo-controlled trials included 3364 adults with moderate-to-severe AD and inadequate response or intolerance to topical treatments or cyclosporine who received dupilumab ± TCS or baricitinib ± TCS.

Disclosures: This study was supported by Eli Lilly and Company. Five authors declared being employees or shareholders of Eli Lilly. The other authors reported ties with various sources, including Eli Lilly.

Source: de Bruin-Weller MS et al. Indirect treatment comparison of baricitinib versus dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 (May 11). Doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00734-w

Key clinical point: Baricitinib vs. dupilumab demonstrated similar efficacy in reducing atopic dermatitis (AD) severity and improving quality of life (QoL), with more rapid improvement in itch.

Major finding: A dose of 4 mg baricitinib vs. dupilumab as monotherapy or with topical corticosteroids (TCS) was more likely to show ≥4-point improvement in itch scores at 4 weeks among patients with inadequate response or intolerance to topical treatments (dupliumab: relative risk [RR] 2.62; P = .013; TCS: RR 2.16; P = .029). However, both drugs showed similar efficacy across Eczema Area and Severity Index 75, itch, and QoL scores at 16 weeks.

Study details: This data comes from an indirect treatment comparison analysis of nine placebo-controlled trials included 3364 adults with moderate-to-severe AD and inadequate response or intolerance to topical treatments or cyclosporine who received dupilumab ± TCS or baricitinib ± TCS.

Disclosures: This study was supported by Eli Lilly and Company. Five authors declared being employees or shareholders of Eli Lilly. The other authors reported ties with various sources, including Eli Lilly.

Source: de Bruin-Weller MS et al. Indirect treatment comparison of baricitinib versus dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 (May 11). Doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00734-w

Key clinical point: Dupilumab showed an acceptable safety profile and sustained efficacy through 52 weeks in adolescents with inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: Rate of treatment emergent adverse events was 370.2 events/100 patient-years, with most being mild/moderate. At least 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index scores was achieved by 81.2% of patients receiving dupilumab at week 52 and 51.9% of patients who were uptitrated from every-4-week (q4w) to every-2-week (q2w) dosing regimen at week 48 after the first uptitration visit.

Study details: Findings are from an ongoing open-label extension study, LIBERTY AD PED-OLE, including 294 adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD who participated in previous dupilumab trials, received dupilumab q4w, and were uptitrated to the weight-tiered q2w dose regimen upon inadequate clinical response.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Eight authors declared being employees or shareholders of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals or Sanofi, and the other authors reported ties with various sources, including Sanofi and Regeneron.

Source: Blauvelt A et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Results through week 52 from a phase III open-label extension trial (LIBERTY AD PED-OLE). Am J Clin Dermatol. 2022;23:365–383  (May 14). Doi: 10.1007/s40257-022-00683-2

Key clinical point: Dupilumab showed an acceptable safety profile and sustained efficacy through 52 weeks in adolescents with inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: Rate of treatment emergent adverse events was 370.2 events/100 patient-years, with most being mild/moderate. At least 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index scores was achieved by 81.2% of patients receiving dupilumab at week 52 and 51.9% of patients who were uptitrated from every-4-week (q4w) to every-2-week (q2w) dosing regimen at week 48 after the first uptitration visit.

Study details: Findings are from an ongoing open-label extension study, LIBERTY AD PED-OLE, including 294 adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD who participated in previous dupilumab trials, received dupilumab q4w, and were uptitrated to the weight-tiered q2w dose regimen upon inadequate clinical response.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Eight authors declared being employees or shareholders of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals or Sanofi, and the other authors reported ties with various sources, including Sanofi and Regeneron.

Source: Blauvelt A et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Results through week 52 from a phase III open-label extension trial (LIBERTY AD PED-OLE). Am J Clin Dermatol. 2022;23:365–383  (May 14). Doi: 10.1007/s40257-022-00683-2

Key clinical point: Dupilumab showed an acceptable safety profile and sustained efficacy through 52 weeks in adolescents with inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: Rate of treatment emergent adverse events was 370.2 events/100 patient-years, with most being mild/moderate. At least 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index scores was achieved by 81.2% of patients receiving dupilumab at week 52 and 51.9% of patients who were uptitrated from every-4-week (q4w) to every-2-week (q2w) dosing regimen at week 48 after the first uptitration visit.

Study details: Findings are from an ongoing open-label extension study, LIBERTY AD PED-OLE, including 294 adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD who participated in previous dupilumab trials, received dupilumab q4w, and were uptitrated to the weight-tiered q2w dose regimen upon inadequate clinical response.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Eight authors declared being employees or shareholders of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals or Sanofi, and the other authors reported ties with various sources, including Sanofi and Regeneron.

Source: Blauvelt A et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Results through week 52 from a phase III open-label extension trial (LIBERTY AD PED-OLE). Am J Clin Dermatol. 2022;23:365–383  (May 14). Doi: 10.1007/s40257-022-00683-2

Key clinical point: Adagrasib shows favorable clinical efficacy without any new safety signals in patients with previously treated KRAS^G12C-mutated nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Major finding: Among patients with measurable disease at baseline, 42.9% had a confirmed objective response. The median progression-free survival was 6.5 (95% CI 4.7-8.4) months. At a median follow-up of 15.6 months, the median overall survival was 12.6 (95% CI 9.2-19.2) months. The treatment-related adverse events of grade 1/2 and 3 occurred in 52.6% and 44.8% of patients, respectively.

Study details: This registrational phase 2 cohort study investigated adagrasib in 116 patients with KRAS^G12C-mutated NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy with or without anti-programmed death 1 or programmed death ligand 1 therapy.

Disclosures: The study was funded by Mirati Therapeutics. The authors reported ties with one or more pharmaceutical companies, including employment or stock options in Mirati Therapeutics.

Source: Jänne PA et al. Adagrasib in non–small-cell lung cancer harboring a KRAS^G12C mutation. N Engl J Med. 2022 (Jun 3). Doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204619

Key clinical point: Adagrasib shows favorable clinical efficacy without any new safety signals in patients with previously treated KRAS^G12C-mutated nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Major finding: Among patients with measurable disease at baseline, 42.9% had a confirmed objective response. The median progression-free survival was 6.5 (95% CI 4.7-8.4) months. At a median follow-up of 15.6 months, the median overall survival was 12.6 (95% CI 9.2-19.2) months. The treatment-related adverse events of grade 1/2 and 3 occurred in 52.6% and 44.8% of patients, respectively.

Study details: This registrational phase 2 cohort study investigated adagrasib in 116 patients with KRAS^G12C-mutated NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy with or without anti-programmed death 1 or programmed death ligand 1 therapy.

Disclosures: The study was funded by Mirati Therapeutics. The authors reported ties with one or more pharmaceutical companies, including employment or stock options in Mirati Therapeutics.

Source: Jänne PA et al. Adagrasib in non–small-cell lung cancer harboring a KRAS^G12C mutation. N Engl J Med. 2022 (Jun 3). Doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204619

Key clinical point: Adagrasib shows favorable clinical efficacy without any new safety signals in patients with previously treated KRAS^G12C-mutated nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Major finding: Among patients with measurable disease at baseline, 42.9% had a confirmed objective response. The median progression-free survival was 6.5 (95% CI 4.7-8.4) months. At a median follow-up of 15.6 months, the median overall survival was 12.6 (95% CI 9.2-19.2) months. The treatment-related adverse events of grade 1/2 and 3 occurred in 52.6% and 44.8% of patients, respectively.

Study details: This registrational phase 2 cohort study investigated adagrasib in 116 patients with KRAS^G12C-mutated NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy with or without anti-programmed death 1 or programmed death ligand 1 therapy.

Disclosures: The study was funded by Mirati Therapeutics. The authors reported ties with one or more pharmaceutical companies, including employment or stock options in Mirati Therapeutics.

Source: Jänne PA et al. Adagrasib in non–small-cell lung cancer harboring a KRAS^G12C mutation. N Engl J Med. 2022 (Jun 3). Doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204619

Key clinical point: Cemiplimab appears to have the most favorable benefit-risk ratio among the analyzed immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for the treatment of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Major finding: Cemiplimab was associated with the lowest hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) relative to chemotherapy (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0. 57-0.81), translating to the highest surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value of 49.5%. Additionally, cemiplimab was associated with the lowest incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) relative to chemotherapy (odds ratio 0.17; 95% credible interval 0.06-0.45).

Study details: The data come from a network meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials (n = 7795). The SUCRA values of all ICI (cemiplimab, avelumab, atezolizumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab) were determined for OS and TRAE.

Disclosures: No funding source was identified. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Jiang M et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: A network meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled studies. Front Oncol. 2022;12:827050 (May 10). Doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.827050

Key clinical point: Cemiplimab appears to have the most favorable benefit-risk ratio among the analyzed immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for the treatment of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Major finding: Cemiplimab was associated with the lowest hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) relative to chemotherapy (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0. 57-0.81), translating to the highest surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value of 49.5%. Additionally, cemiplimab was associated with the lowest incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) relative to chemotherapy (odds ratio 0.17; 95% credible interval 0.06-0.45).

Study details: The data come from a network meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials (n = 7795). The SUCRA values of all ICI (cemiplimab, avelumab, atezolizumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab) were determined for OS and TRAE.

Disclosures: No funding source was identified. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Jiang M et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: A network meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled studies. Front Oncol. 2022;12:827050 (May 10). Doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.827050

Key clinical point: Cemiplimab appears to have the most favorable benefit-risk ratio among the analyzed immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for the treatment of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Major finding: Cemiplimab was associated with the lowest hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) relative to chemotherapy (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0. 57-0.81), translating to the highest surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value of 49.5%. Additionally, cemiplimab was associated with the lowest incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) relative to chemotherapy (odds ratio 0.17; 95% credible interval 0.06-0.45).

Study details: The data come from a network meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials (n = 7795). The SUCRA values of all ICI (cemiplimab, avelumab, atezolizumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab) were determined for OS and TRAE.

Disclosures: No funding source was identified. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Jiang M et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: A network meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled studies. Front Oncol. 2022;12:827050 (May 10). Doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.827050

Key clinical point: Adagrasib shows favorable clinical efficacy without any new safety signals in patients with previously treated KRAS^G12C-mutated nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Major finding: Among patients with measurable disease at baseline, 42.9% had a confirmed objective response. The median progression-free survival was 6.5 (95% CI 4.7-8.4) months. At a median follow-up of 15.6 months, the median overall survival was 12.6 (95% CI 9.2-19.2) months. The treatment-related adverse events of grade 1/2 and 3 occurred in 52.6% and 44.8% of patients, respectively.

Study details: This registrational phase 2 cohort study investigated adagrasib in 116 patients with KRAS^G12C-mutated NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy with or without anti-programmed death 1 or programmed death ligand 1 therapy.

Disclosures: The study was funded by Mirati Therapeutics. The authors reported ties with one or more pharmaceutical companies, including employment or stock options in Mirati Therapeutics.

Source: Jänne PA et al. Adagrasib in non–small-cell lung cancer harboring a KRAS^G12C mutation. N Engl J Med. 2022 (Jun 3). Doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204619

Key clinical point: Adagrasib shows favorable clinical efficacy without any new safety signals in patients with previously treated KRAS^G12C-mutated nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Major finding: Among patients with measurable disease at baseline, 42.9% had a confirmed objective response. The median progression-free survival was 6.5 (95% CI 4.7-8.4) months. At a median follow-up of 15.6 months, the median overall survival was 12.6 (95% CI 9.2-19.2) months. The treatment-related adverse events of grade 1/2 and 3 occurred in 52.6% and 44.8% of patients, respectively.

Study details: This registrational phase 2 cohort study investigated adagrasib in 116 patients with KRAS^G12C-mutated NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy with or without anti-programmed death 1 or programmed death ligand 1 therapy.

Disclosures: The study was funded by Mirati Therapeutics. The authors reported ties with one or more pharmaceutical companies, including employment or stock options in Mirati Therapeutics.

Source: Jänne PA et al. Adagrasib in non–small-cell lung cancer harboring a KRAS^G12C mutation. N Engl J Med. 2022 (Jun 3). Doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204619

Key clinical point: Adagrasib shows favorable clinical efficacy without any new safety signals in patients with previously treated KRAS^G12C-mutated nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Major finding: Among patients with measurable disease at baseline, 42.9% had a confirmed objective response. The median progression-free survival was 6.5 (95% CI 4.7-8.4) months. At a median follow-up of 15.6 months, the median overall survival was 12.6 (95% CI 9.2-19.2) months. The treatment-related adverse events of grade 1/2 and 3 occurred in 52.6% and 44.8% of patients, respectively.

Study details: This registrational phase 2 cohort study investigated adagrasib in 116 patients with KRAS^G12C-mutated NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy with or without anti-programmed death 1 or programmed death ligand 1 therapy.

Disclosures: The study was funded by Mirati Therapeutics. The authors reported ties with one or more pharmaceutical companies, including employment or stock options in Mirati Therapeutics.

Source: Jänne PA et al. Adagrasib in non–small-cell lung cancer harboring a KRAS^G12C mutation. N Engl J Med. 2022 (Jun 3). Doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204619

Key clinical point: A modeling study suggests that the low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening of high-risk adults is likely to be cost saving by shifting lung cancer diagnosis to earlier stages.

Major finding: LDCT screening would lead to a stage shift toward earlier diagnosis, with 43% more patients being identified at stage I or II. The estimated screening costs, at $35.6 million, avoid $42 million in treating later stages of the disease, resulting in a cost saving of $6.65 million.

Study details: Canadian researchers used a decision analytic modeling technique to compare the benefits of earlier diagnosis of lung cancer with the costs of screening in current and former smokers aged 55-74 years.

Disclosures: The study did not receive any funding. A Tremblay and D Steward reported ties with one or more pharmaceutical companies or health organizations. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Thanh NX et al. Expected cost savings from low dose computed tomography scan screening for lung cancer in Alberta, Canada. JTO Clin Res Rep. 2022 (Jun 2). Doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100350

Key clinical point: A modeling study suggests that the low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening of high-risk adults is likely to be cost saving by shifting lung cancer diagnosis to earlier stages.

Major finding: LDCT screening would lead to a stage shift toward earlier diagnosis, with 43% more patients being identified at stage I or II. The estimated screening costs, at $35.6 million, avoid $42 million in treating later stages of the disease, resulting in a cost saving of $6.65 million.

Study details: Canadian researchers used a decision analytic modeling technique to compare the benefits of earlier diagnosis of lung cancer with the costs of screening in current and former smokers aged 55-74 years.

Disclosures: The study did not receive any funding. A Tremblay and D Steward reported ties with one or more pharmaceutical companies or health organizations. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Thanh NX et al. Expected cost savings from low dose computed tomography scan screening for lung cancer in Alberta, Canada. JTO Clin Res Rep. 2022 (Jun 2). Doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100350

Key clinical point: A modeling study suggests that the low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening of high-risk adults is likely to be cost saving by shifting lung cancer diagnosis to earlier stages.

Major finding: LDCT screening would lead to a stage shift toward earlier diagnosis, with 43% more patients being identified at stage I or II. The estimated screening costs, at $35.6 million, avoid $42 million in treating later stages of the disease, resulting in a cost saving of $6.65 million.

Study details: Canadian researchers used a decision analytic modeling technique to compare the benefits of earlier diagnosis of lung cancer with the costs of screening in current and former smokers aged 55-74 years.

Disclosures: The study did not receive any funding. A Tremblay and D Steward reported ties with one or more pharmaceutical companies or health organizations. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Thanh NX et al. Expected cost savings from low dose computed tomography scan screening for lung cancer in Alberta, Canada. JTO Clin Res Rep. 2022 (Jun 2). Doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100350