Establishing a Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing Program in Practice

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 05/21/2019 - 12:17
Display Headline
Establishing a Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing Program in Practice

Traditional prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidies involves screening via a combination of ultrasound analysis and serial detection of maternal serum markers, including hCG and PAPP-A, in the first and second trimesters, with follow-up diagnosis by invasive procedures such as amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS). Large, multicenter, first-trimester prospective screening studies revealed detection rates for trisomy 21 ranging from 79% to 90%, with false positive rates of 5%.2 Detection of trisomy 18 and 13 with traditional non-invasive methods is less effective than detection of trisomy 21. Positive screens require confirmatory testing via a diagnostic invasive procedure, which is associated with a procedure-induced pregnancy loss risk of up to 1 in 300 to 500.3 Furthermore, most sex chromosome aneuploidies are typically only detected by invasive procedures, since traditional non-invasive screening methods are not designed to detect these aneuploidies.

 

Sponsor
This supplement is sponsored by Natera, Inc.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

 

Jeffrey Marks, MD
Countryside Obstetrics & Gynecology
Clearwater, Florida
 

Melissa Mancuso, MD
Co-Director, Fetal Treatment Center
Maternal Fetal Medicine
and Medical Genetics
Akron Children’s Hospital
Akron, Ohio
 

Mitchell Nudelman, MD
Bellegrove Obstetrics & Gynecology
Bellevue, Washington
 

Publications
Legacy Keywords
pregnancy,Panorama,Natera,non-invasive prenatal testing,aneuploidies,trisomy 21,trisomy 18,trisomy 13,Down syndrome,Edwards syndrome,Patau syndrome,CDC,chromosome abnormality,cases per live births,maternal fetal medicine,Jeffrey Marks,Melissa Mancuso,Mitchell Nudelman
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

 

Jeffrey Marks, MD
Countryside Obstetrics & Gynecology
Clearwater, Florida
 

Melissa Mancuso, MD
Co-Director, Fetal Treatment Center
Maternal Fetal Medicine
and Medical Genetics
Akron Children’s Hospital
Akron, Ohio
 

Mitchell Nudelman, MD
Bellegrove Obstetrics & Gynecology
Bellevue, Washington
 

Author and Disclosure Information

 

Jeffrey Marks, MD
Countryside Obstetrics & Gynecology
Clearwater, Florida
 

Melissa Mancuso, MD
Co-Director, Fetal Treatment Center
Maternal Fetal Medicine
and Medical Genetics
Akron Children’s Hospital
Akron, Ohio
 

Mitchell Nudelman, MD
Bellegrove Obstetrics & Gynecology
Bellevue, Washington
 

Article PDF
Article PDF
Sponsor
This supplement is sponsored by Natera, Inc.
Sponsor
This supplement is sponsored by Natera, Inc.

Traditional prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidies involves screening via a combination of ultrasound analysis and serial detection of maternal serum markers, including hCG and PAPP-A, in the first and second trimesters, with follow-up diagnosis by invasive procedures such as amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS). Large, multicenter, first-trimester prospective screening studies revealed detection rates for trisomy 21 ranging from 79% to 90%, with false positive rates of 5%.2 Detection of trisomy 18 and 13 with traditional non-invasive methods is less effective than detection of trisomy 21. Positive screens require confirmatory testing via a diagnostic invasive procedure, which is associated with a procedure-induced pregnancy loss risk of up to 1 in 300 to 500.3 Furthermore, most sex chromosome aneuploidies are typically only detected by invasive procedures, since traditional non-invasive screening methods are not designed to detect these aneuploidies.

 

Traditional prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidies involves screening via a combination of ultrasound analysis and serial detection of maternal serum markers, including hCG and PAPP-A, in the first and second trimesters, with follow-up diagnosis by invasive procedures such as amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS). Large, multicenter, first-trimester prospective screening studies revealed detection rates for trisomy 21 ranging from 79% to 90%, with false positive rates of 5%.2 Detection of trisomy 18 and 13 with traditional non-invasive methods is less effective than detection of trisomy 21. Positive screens require confirmatory testing via a diagnostic invasive procedure, which is associated with a procedure-induced pregnancy loss risk of up to 1 in 300 to 500.3 Furthermore, most sex chromosome aneuploidies are typically only detected by invasive procedures, since traditional non-invasive screening methods are not designed to detect these aneuploidies.

 

Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Establishing a Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing Program in Practice
Display Headline
Establishing a Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing Program in Practice
Legacy Keywords
pregnancy,Panorama,Natera,non-invasive prenatal testing,aneuploidies,trisomy 21,trisomy 18,trisomy 13,Down syndrome,Edwards syndrome,Patau syndrome,CDC,chromosome abnormality,cases per live births,maternal fetal medicine,Jeffrey Marks,Melissa Mancuso,Mitchell Nudelman
Legacy Keywords
pregnancy,Panorama,Natera,non-invasive prenatal testing,aneuploidies,trisomy 21,trisomy 18,trisomy 13,Down syndrome,Edwards syndrome,Patau syndrome,CDC,chromosome abnormality,cases per live births,maternal fetal medicine,Jeffrey Marks,Melissa Mancuso,Mitchell Nudelman
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media