One AA meeting doesn’t fit all: 6 keys to prescribing 12-step programs

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/11/2018 - 15:12
Display Headline
One AA meeting doesn’t fit all: 6 keys to prescribing 12-step programs

“Honestly, all that religious talk turned me off.”

“The meeting was like sitting in a chimney – I practically choked to death.”

“I was the only person there without a tattoo.”

Attending the wrong 12-step meeting can turn off some patients, despite the substance abuse treatment support offered by Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and similar programs. Because of the stigma associated with alcohol or drug addiction, most patients are ambivalent at best about attending their first 12-step meetings. Feeling “out of place”—the most common turn-off—can transform this ambivalence into adamant resistance.

Simply advising an addicted patient to “call AA” is tantamount to giving a depressed patient a copy of the Physicians’ Desk Reference and telling him or her to pick an antidepressant. Not all 12-step meetings are alike; 50,000 AA meetings are held every week in the United States (Box 1).1-7 Recognizing the differences between the groups in your area will help you guide your patients to the best match.

In prescribing a 12-step program, consider these six patient factors: socioeconomic status, gender, age, attitude towards spirituality, smoking status, and drug of choice.

Box 1

12-STEP THERAPY: AN AMERICAN ‘RELIGION’

More than 50,000 AA meetings, 20,000 NA meetings, and at least 15,000 Alanon/Alateen meetings are held every week in the United States. Other 12-step fellowships that model the AA approach include Gamblers Anonymous, Sex and Love Addicts Anonymous, Overeaters Anonymous, Cocaine Anonymous, Smokers Anonymous, Debtors Anonymous, Dual Recovery Anonymous, and Co-dependence Anonymous.

The combined membership of AA, NA, and Alanon/Alateen is approximately 2 million. To put this in perspective, if the 12-step approach was a religion—as some have proposed1 —it would have more U.S. congregants than Buddhism and Hinduism combined.

Although 12-step therapy has been a central tenet of community-based substance abuse treatment for more than 50 years,2 only recently has it become a focus of clinical research. Two major national multicenter clinical trials3,4 and several important but smaller clinical studies5-7 have found that 12-step-oriented therapies achieve modestly better abstinence rates than the psychotherapies with which they were compared.

Socioeconomic status

Matching patients with meetings according to socioeconomic status is not elitist—it’s pragmatic. Patients generally feel most comfortable and relate most readily at meetings where they feel they have something in common with the other members. For example, when a newly recovering middle-class alcoholic visits an AA group that is frequented by homeless and unemployed alcoholics, chances are that he will become more ambivalent about attending meetings. After all, he was never “that bad.”

A good practice is to give your patients an up-to-date 12-step meeting directory (Box 2). Suggest that they identify the meetings where they think they will feel most comfortable, based on the neighborhoods in which they are held.

Patients in early recovery often are terrified of encountering someone they know at a 12-step meeting. One strategy for patients concerned about protecting their anonymity—as many are—is to attend meetings outside their own neighborhoods but still in areas that match their socioeconomic status. Similarly, referring patients to meetings that are “closed to members only” might reduce their concerns about exposure.

Once a patient has connected with a 12-step program, matching by socioeconomic status becomes less important. Many begin to see similarities between themselves and other addicted individuals from all walks of life. In the beginning, however, similarities attract.

Your patient’s gender

Though women were once a small minority in AA and Narcotics Anonymous (NA), today they make up about one-third of AA’s membership and more than 40% of NA.8 One factor that may have boosted the number of women attending 12-step programs is the increased availability of women-only meetings.

Most cities have women-only meetings, and they generally will be a good place for your female patients to begin. Evidence indicates that gender-specific treatment enhances treatment outcomes.9,10 Women-only meetings tend to be smaller than mixed groups, and the senior members are often particularly willing to welcome newcomers.

Although it is severely frowned upon, the phenomenon of AA or NA members attempting to become romantically or sexually involved with a newcomer is common enough that 12-step members have coined a term for it: “13-stepping.” Newly recovering patients are often emotionally vulnerable and at risk of becoming enmeshed in a potentially destructive relationship. Beginning recovery in gender-specific meetings helps to reduce this risk.

Your patient’s age

A 12-step meeting dominated by people with gray, blue, or no hair can quickly put off teens and young adults in early recovery. Though these meetings with older members are likely to include persons who have achieved long-term and healthy recovery (making such meetings ideal territory for finding a sponsor), finding peers of a similar age is also important.

 

 

Meetings intended for young people are identified in 12-step meeting directories, but many of these “young peoples’ ” meetings have a preponderance of members older than 30—quite ancient by a 16-year-old’s standards. Conversely, some generic 12-step meetings might have a cadre of teenagers that attend regularly—at least for a while.

In AA and NA, teens and young adults tend to travel in nomadic packs, linger for a few months, then move on. For this reason, having contacts familiar with the characteristics of local meetings can be invaluable as you try to match a younger patient with a 12-step meeting.

Attitude toward spirituality

One of patients’ most common complaints about 12-step meetings is their surprise at how “religious” the programs are. Insiders are quick to point out that 12-step programs are “spiritual” and not “religious,” but the distinction is moot to patients who are uneasy with this aspect of meetings. The talk about “God as I understand Him,” the opening and closing of meetings with prayers, and the generous adoption of Judeo-Christian practices can rub agnostic, atheistic, and otherwise spiritually indifferent patients the wrong way.

To protect your patients from being blind-sided, review with them some of the spiritual practices employed in 12-step programs before they attend their first meeting:

  • Meetings begin with reading the Twelve Steps (Box 3) and other 12-step literature; all readings are peppered with spiritually-loaded words such as “God,” “Higher Power,” “prayer,” and “meditation.”
  • Meetings end with a prayer in which the group stands and holds hands (in AA) or links their arms in a huddle (NA). [I advise patients who might find this activity intolerable to duck out to the rest room 5 minutes before the meeting ends.]
  • Group leaders typically collect donations by passing the basket.

Certain meetings have a particularly heavy spiritual focus and might be appropriately prescribed for patients hungering for spiritual growth. But for patients who have had toxic encounters with religion or otherwise are ill-at-ease with spirituality or religious matters, starting out at one of the more spiritually hardcore 12-step meetings could be overwhelming. While your 12-step contact person is your best guide in these matters, the following points also apply:

  • Meetings listed as “11th Step” or “God as I understand Him” meetings will have a strong spiritual focus.
  • Meetings held on Sunday mornings often have the express purpose of focusing on spirituality.
  • “Step” meetings generally have a more spiritual focus, as 11 of the 12 steps are aimed at eliciting a “spiritual awakening.”
  • “Speaker” or “topic discussion” meetings tend to have a less spiritual focus, though this will vary with the meeting chairperson’s preferences.
  • “Beginners” meetings, when available, are intended for new members and devote more time to helping the newcomer understand the 12-step approach to spirituality.

Box 2

TOOLS FOR MAKING 12-STEP MEETING REFERRALS

Unless you regularly attend 12-step meetings, it is impossible to know which groups would be the best match for your patients. Here are suggestions for matching your patient’s needs with local 12-step meetings:

  • Use fellowship directories. All 12-step fellowships maintain directories of where and when meetings are held and whether meetings are nonsmoking or have other restrictions (e.g., gay-only, women-only). For directories, call local AA and NA fellowships (in the phone book’s white pages).
  • Develop a 12-step contact list. Rehabilitation centers often have counselors on staff who are familiar with local 12-step meetings and can recommend those that match your patients’ characteristics. Counselors who are active AA or NA members can be a valuable resource in identifying subtle differences in meetings.
  • Locate 12-step meetings for impaired professionals. Special 12-step meetings for nurses, physicians, and pharmacists are held in many cities. For technical reasons, these are not “official”12-step meetings and are not listed in 12-step directories. Times and locations can generally be obtained from local medical societies, impaired-professional programs, or treatment centers.

Box 3

THE 12 STEPS OF ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS

  1. We admitted we were powerless over alcohol—that our lives had become unmanageable.
  2. Cameto believe that a Power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity.
  3. Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood Him.
  4. Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves.
  5. Admitted to God, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs.
  6. Were entirely ready to have God remove all these defects of character.
  7. Humbly asked Him to remove our shortcomings.
  8. Made a list of all persons we had harmed, and became willing to make amends to them all.
  9. Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would injure them or others.
  10. Continued to take personal inventory and when we were wrong promptly admitted it.
  11. Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with God as we understood Him, praying only for knowledge of His will for us and the power to carry that out.
  12. Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps, we tried to carry this message to alcoholics and to practice these principles in all our affairs.

Source: Alcoholics Anonymous

 

 

AA’s main text, the so-called “Big Book” (its real title is: Alcoholics Anonymous7) has a chapter titled, “We Agnostics.” AA has many long-time members who have found support in the fellowship but never “found God” or a belief in a higher power other than the fellowship itself. These secular 12-step members demonstrate one of the many ironies of AA and NA—that spiritual fellowships can work even for individuals who reject spirituality.

Patients who resist spirituality are advised to “take what you can use” from the fellowship and “leave the rest.” While 12-step members will propose that the newcomer keep an open mind about spirituality, patients should also be assured that a seat is always waiting for them, regardless.

Whether your patient smokes

Most 12-step meetings today are smoke-free, not because of enlightenment within the fellowships but because meetings are usually held in churches, synagogues, and health care facilities where smoking is banned. The perception that attending 12-step meetings can be harmful to your health is out-of-date. Nonetheless, because most meetings have banned smoking, the few in which smoking is allowed are thick with smoke.

In general, 12-step clubhouses are among the holdouts where smoking is allowed during and after meetings. A clubhouse is typically a storefront rented or acquired by AA/NA members where meetings are held around the clock. Given the evidence that quitting smoking may improve overall health,10,11 patients should be encouraged to begin their involvement in smoke-free fellowships, which are identified in 12-step directories.

Your patient’s drug of choice

As its name implies, AA is intended for persons who desire to stop drinking. In practice, however, much of AA’s membership is addicted to more than one substance, and—in some cases—the drug of choice might not be alcohol.

Narcotics Anonymous—contrary to what its name implies—is for individuals addicted to any drug, not just narcotics. Patients generally should be advised to join the fellowship (AA or NA) that best matches their substance use history. There is, however, at least one exception that might best be illustrated with an example:

After I recommended NA meetings to a middle-class nurse addicted to analgesics, she returned for her next appointment quite angry. She attended three different NA meetings, and “all of the members were either heroin or crack cocaine addicts.” It seemed to her that all of them were on probation or parole. She was very uncomfortable throughout the meetings and upset with my recommendation.

In matching patients with meetings, socioeconomic and cultural factors take precedence over biochemistry. At the neuronal level, a nurse addicted to analgesics has a lot in common with a heroin addict, but her ability to relate to another recovering person—particularly in early recovery—may be limited. Arguing with my patient or countering that other nurses were probably at the meetings she attended would not have eased her reluctance to return to NA or helped our therapeutic alliance.

NA meetings are generally attended by individuals addicted to illicit drugs: amphetamines, crack cocaine, cannabis, and heroin. In larger cities, other 12-step fellowships may focus on specific drugs, such as cocaine, but these are rare. Just as individuals addicted to prescription narcotics are a minority in the treatment population, they are also a minority in NA.

For this reason, our prior recommendation—to match patients to meetings based on socioeconomic status—applies. It’s good policy to recommend that patients addicted to prescription medications try both AA and NA meetings and decide where they feel most comfortable.

The third tradition of AA states, “the only requirement for AA membership is a desire to stop drinking.” Though a purist might suggest that our analgesics-dependent nurse should join NA, her need to connect culturally with similar persons in recovery argues strongly for her to blend in at open AA meetings. A social drinker who never fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for alcohol dependence, she will have a better chance of abstaining from analgesics if she abstains from alcohol as well. For this reason, she should qualify for AA membership because she does, in fact, have “a desire to stop drinking.”

Some professionals addicted to prescription drugs will feel at home in NA meetings, whereas others will react as my patient did. Having access to a 12-step contact person who knows about the demographics of local NA meetings can help you make the best patient/meeting match.

Related resources

References

1. The Church of God Anonymous (religion of the 12-step movement) http://www.churchofgodanonymous.org/index2.html

2. White W. Slaying the Dragon Bloomington, IL: Chestnut Health Systems, 1998.

3. Crits-Christoph P, Siqueland L, Blaine J, et al. Psychosocial treatments for cocaine dependence: National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999;57(6):493-502.

4. Project Match. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. J Studies Alcohol 1997;58(1):7-29.

5. Ouimette PC, Finney JW, Moos RH. Twelve-step and cognitive-behavioral treatment for substance abuse: A comparison of treatment effectiveness. J Consult Clin Psychology 1997;65:230-40.

6. Morgenstern J, Blanchard KA, Morgan TJ, Labouvie E, Hayaki J. Testing the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral treatment for substance abuse in a community setting: Within treatment and post-treatment findings. J Consult Clin Psychology 2001;69:1007-17.

7. Alcoholics Anonymous (3rd ed). New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Service, 1976.

8. Emrick CD, Tonigan SJ, Montgomery H, Little L. Alcoholics Anonymous: what is currently known. In: McCrady BS, Miller WR (eds). Research on Alcoholics Anonymous New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center on Alcohol Studies Publications, 1993:45.

9. Blume S. Addiction in women. In: Galanter M, Kleber HD (eds). Textbook of substance abuse treatment (2nd ed). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1999;485-91.

10. Jarvis TJ. Implications of gender for alcohol treatment research: a quantitative and qualitative review. Br J Addiction 1992;87:1249-61.

11. Bobo JK, McIlvain HE, Lando HA, Walker RD, Leed-Kelly A. Effect of smoking cessation counseling on recovery from alcoholism: findings from a randomized community intervention trial. Addiction 1998;93:877-87.

12. Burling TA, Marshall GD, Seidner AL. Smoking cessation for substance abuse inpatients. J Subs Abuse 1991;3(3):269-76.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Robert F. Forman, PhD
Assistant professor of psychology in psychiatry Treatment Research Institute University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 01(10)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
16-24
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Robert F. Forman, PhD
Assistant professor of psychology in psychiatry Treatment Research Institute University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

Author and Disclosure Information

Robert F. Forman, PhD
Assistant professor of psychology in psychiatry Treatment Research Institute University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

Article PDF
Article PDF

“Honestly, all that religious talk turned me off.”

“The meeting was like sitting in a chimney – I practically choked to death.”

“I was the only person there without a tattoo.”

Attending the wrong 12-step meeting can turn off some patients, despite the substance abuse treatment support offered by Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and similar programs. Because of the stigma associated with alcohol or drug addiction, most patients are ambivalent at best about attending their first 12-step meetings. Feeling “out of place”—the most common turn-off—can transform this ambivalence into adamant resistance.

Simply advising an addicted patient to “call AA” is tantamount to giving a depressed patient a copy of the Physicians’ Desk Reference and telling him or her to pick an antidepressant. Not all 12-step meetings are alike; 50,000 AA meetings are held every week in the United States (Box 1).1-7 Recognizing the differences between the groups in your area will help you guide your patients to the best match.

In prescribing a 12-step program, consider these six patient factors: socioeconomic status, gender, age, attitude towards spirituality, smoking status, and drug of choice.

Box 1

12-STEP THERAPY: AN AMERICAN ‘RELIGION’

More than 50,000 AA meetings, 20,000 NA meetings, and at least 15,000 Alanon/Alateen meetings are held every week in the United States. Other 12-step fellowships that model the AA approach include Gamblers Anonymous, Sex and Love Addicts Anonymous, Overeaters Anonymous, Cocaine Anonymous, Smokers Anonymous, Debtors Anonymous, Dual Recovery Anonymous, and Co-dependence Anonymous.

The combined membership of AA, NA, and Alanon/Alateen is approximately 2 million. To put this in perspective, if the 12-step approach was a religion—as some have proposed1 —it would have more U.S. congregants than Buddhism and Hinduism combined.

Although 12-step therapy has been a central tenet of community-based substance abuse treatment for more than 50 years,2 only recently has it become a focus of clinical research. Two major national multicenter clinical trials3,4 and several important but smaller clinical studies5-7 have found that 12-step-oriented therapies achieve modestly better abstinence rates than the psychotherapies with which they were compared.

Socioeconomic status

Matching patients with meetings according to socioeconomic status is not elitist—it’s pragmatic. Patients generally feel most comfortable and relate most readily at meetings where they feel they have something in common with the other members. For example, when a newly recovering middle-class alcoholic visits an AA group that is frequented by homeless and unemployed alcoholics, chances are that he will become more ambivalent about attending meetings. After all, he was never “that bad.”

A good practice is to give your patients an up-to-date 12-step meeting directory (Box 2). Suggest that they identify the meetings where they think they will feel most comfortable, based on the neighborhoods in which they are held.

Patients in early recovery often are terrified of encountering someone they know at a 12-step meeting. One strategy for patients concerned about protecting their anonymity—as many are—is to attend meetings outside their own neighborhoods but still in areas that match their socioeconomic status. Similarly, referring patients to meetings that are “closed to members only” might reduce their concerns about exposure.

Once a patient has connected with a 12-step program, matching by socioeconomic status becomes less important. Many begin to see similarities between themselves and other addicted individuals from all walks of life. In the beginning, however, similarities attract.

Your patient’s gender

Though women were once a small minority in AA and Narcotics Anonymous (NA), today they make up about one-third of AA’s membership and more than 40% of NA.8 One factor that may have boosted the number of women attending 12-step programs is the increased availability of women-only meetings.

Most cities have women-only meetings, and they generally will be a good place for your female patients to begin. Evidence indicates that gender-specific treatment enhances treatment outcomes.9,10 Women-only meetings tend to be smaller than mixed groups, and the senior members are often particularly willing to welcome newcomers.

Although it is severely frowned upon, the phenomenon of AA or NA members attempting to become romantically or sexually involved with a newcomer is common enough that 12-step members have coined a term for it: “13-stepping.” Newly recovering patients are often emotionally vulnerable and at risk of becoming enmeshed in a potentially destructive relationship. Beginning recovery in gender-specific meetings helps to reduce this risk.

Your patient’s age

A 12-step meeting dominated by people with gray, blue, or no hair can quickly put off teens and young adults in early recovery. Though these meetings with older members are likely to include persons who have achieved long-term and healthy recovery (making such meetings ideal territory for finding a sponsor), finding peers of a similar age is also important.

 

 

Meetings intended for young people are identified in 12-step meeting directories, but many of these “young peoples’ ” meetings have a preponderance of members older than 30—quite ancient by a 16-year-old’s standards. Conversely, some generic 12-step meetings might have a cadre of teenagers that attend regularly—at least for a while.

In AA and NA, teens and young adults tend to travel in nomadic packs, linger for a few months, then move on. For this reason, having contacts familiar with the characteristics of local meetings can be invaluable as you try to match a younger patient with a 12-step meeting.

Attitude toward spirituality

One of patients’ most common complaints about 12-step meetings is their surprise at how “religious” the programs are. Insiders are quick to point out that 12-step programs are “spiritual” and not “religious,” but the distinction is moot to patients who are uneasy with this aspect of meetings. The talk about “God as I understand Him,” the opening and closing of meetings with prayers, and the generous adoption of Judeo-Christian practices can rub agnostic, atheistic, and otherwise spiritually indifferent patients the wrong way.

To protect your patients from being blind-sided, review with them some of the spiritual practices employed in 12-step programs before they attend their first meeting:

  • Meetings begin with reading the Twelve Steps (Box 3) and other 12-step literature; all readings are peppered with spiritually-loaded words such as “God,” “Higher Power,” “prayer,” and “meditation.”
  • Meetings end with a prayer in which the group stands and holds hands (in AA) or links their arms in a huddle (NA). [I advise patients who might find this activity intolerable to duck out to the rest room 5 minutes before the meeting ends.]
  • Group leaders typically collect donations by passing the basket.

Certain meetings have a particularly heavy spiritual focus and might be appropriately prescribed for patients hungering for spiritual growth. But for patients who have had toxic encounters with religion or otherwise are ill-at-ease with spirituality or religious matters, starting out at one of the more spiritually hardcore 12-step meetings could be overwhelming. While your 12-step contact person is your best guide in these matters, the following points also apply:

  • Meetings listed as “11th Step” or “God as I understand Him” meetings will have a strong spiritual focus.
  • Meetings held on Sunday mornings often have the express purpose of focusing on spirituality.
  • “Step” meetings generally have a more spiritual focus, as 11 of the 12 steps are aimed at eliciting a “spiritual awakening.”
  • “Speaker” or “topic discussion” meetings tend to have a less spiritual focus, though this will vary with the meeting chairperson’s preferences.
  • “Beginners” meetings, when available, are intended for new members and devote more time to helping the newcomer understand the 12-step approach to spirituality.

Box 2

TOOLS FOR MAKING 12-STEP MEETING REFERRALS

Unless you regularly attend 12-step meetings, it is impossible to know which groups would be the best match for your patients. Here are suggestions for matching your patient’s needs with local 12-step meetings:

  • Use fellowship directories. All 12-step fellowships maintain directories of where and when meetings are held and whether meetings are nonsmoking or have other restrictions (e.g., gay-only, women-only). For directories, call local AA and NA fellowships (in the phone book’s white pages).
  • Develop a 12-step contact list. Rehabilitation centers often have counselors on staff who are familiar with local 12-step meetings and can recommend those that match your patients’ characteristics. Counselors who are active AA or NA members can be a valuable resource in identifying subtle differences in meetings.
  • Locate 12-step meetings for impaired professionals. Special 12-step meetings for nurses, physicians, and pharmacists are held in many cities. For technical reasons, these are not “official”12-step meetings and are not listed in 12-step directories. Times and locations can generally be obtained from local medical societies, impaired-professional programs, or treatment centers.

Box 3

THE 12 STEPS OF ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS

  1. We admitted we were powerless over alcohol—that our lives had become unmanageable.
  2. Cameto believe that a Power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity.
  3. Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood Him.
  4. Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves.
  5. Admitted to God, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs.
  6. Were entirely ready to have God remove all these defects of character.
  7. Humbly asked Him to remove our shortcomings.
  8. Made a list of all persons we had harmed, and became willing to make amends to them all.
  9. Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would injure them or others.
  10. Continued to take personal inventory and when we were wrong promptly admitted it.
  11. Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with God as we understood Him, praying only for knowledge of His will for us and the power to carry that out.
  12. Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps, we tried to carry this message to alcoholics and to practice these principles in all our affairs.

Source: Alcoholics Anonymous

 

 

AA’s main text, the so-called “Big Book” (its real title is: Alcoholics Anonymous7) has a chapter titled, “We Agnostics.” AA has many long-time members who have found support in the fellowship but never “found God” or a belief in a higher power other than the fellowship itself. These secular 12-step members demonstrate one of the many ironies of AA and NA—that spiritual fellowships can work even for individuals who reject spirituality.

Patients who resist spirituality are advised to “take what you can use” from the fellowship and “leave the rest.” While 12-step members will propose that the newcomer keep an open mind about spirituality, patients should also be assured that a seat is always waiting for them, regardless.

Whether your patient smokes

Most 12-step meetings today are smoke-free, not because of enlightenment within the fellowships but because meetings are usually held in churches, synagogues, and health care facilities where smoking is banned. The perception that attending 12-step meetings can be harmful to your health is out-of-date. Nonetheless, because most meetings have banned smoking, the few in which smoking is allowed are thick with smoke.

In general, 12-step clubhouses are among the holdouts where smoking is allowed during and after meetings. A clubhouse is typically a storefront rented or acquired by AA/NA members where meetings are held around the clock. Given the evidence that quitting smoking may improve overall health,10,11 patients should be encouraged to begin their involvement in smoke-free fellowships, which are identified in 12-step directories.

Your patient’s drug of choice

As its name implies, AA is intended for persons who desire to stop drinking. In practice, however, much of AA’s membership is addicted to more than one substance, and—in some cases—the drug of choice might not be alcohol.

Narcotics Anonymous—contrary to what its name implies—is for individuals addicted to any drug, not just narcotics. Patients generally should be advised to join the fellowship (AA or NA) that best matches their substance use history. There is, however, at least one exception that might best be illustrated with an example:

After I recommended NA meetings to a middle-class nurse addicted to analgesics, she returned for her next appointment quite angry. She attended three different NA meetings, and “all of the members were either heroin or crack cocaine addicts.” It seemed to her that all of them were on probation or parole. She was very uncomfortable throughout the meetings and upset with my recommendation.

In matching patients with meetings, socioeconomic and cultural factors take precedence over biochemistry. At the neuronal level, a nurse addicted to analgesics has a lot in common with a heroin addict, but her ability to relate to another recovering person—particularly in early recovery—may be limited. Arguing with my patient or countering that other nurses were probably at the meetings she attended would not have eased her reluctance to return to NA or helped our therapeutic alliance.

NA meetings are generally attended by individuals addicted to illicit drugs: amphetamines, crack cocaine, cannabis, and heroin. In larger cities, other 12-step fellowships may focus on specific drugs, such as cocaine, but these are rare. Just as individuals addicted to prescription narcotics are a minority in the treatment population, they are also a minority in NA.

For this reason, our prior recommendation—to match patients to meetings based on socioeconomic status—applies. It’s good policy to recommend that patients addicted to prescription medications try both AA and NA meetings and decide where they feel most comfortable.

The third tradition of AA states, “the only requirement for AA membership is a desire to stop drinking.” Though a purist might suggest that our analgesics-dependent nurse should join NA, her need to connect culturally with similar persons in recovery argues strongly for her to blend in at open AA meetings. A social drinker who never fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for alcohol dependence, she will have a better chance of abstaining from analgesics if she abstains from alcohol as well. For this reason, she should qualify for AA membership because she does, in fact, have “a desire to stop drinking.”

Some professionals addicted to prescription drugs will feel at home in NA meetings, whereas others will react as my patient did. Having access to a 12-step contact person who knows about the demographics of local NA meetings can help you make the best patient/meeting match.

Related resources

“Honestly, all that religious talk turned me off.”

“The meeting was like sitting in a chimney – I practically choked to death.”

“I was the only person there without a tattoo.”

Attending the wrong 12-step meeting can turn off some patients, despite the substance abuse treatment support offered by Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and similar programs. Because of the stigma associated with alcohol or drug addiction, most patients are ambivalent at best about attending their first 12-step meetings. Feeling “out of place”—the most common turn-off—can transform this ambivalence into adamant resistance.

Simply advising an addicted patient to “call AA” is tantamount to giving a depressed patient a copy of the Physicians’ Desk Reference and telling him or her to pick an antidepressant. Not all 12-step meetings are alike; 50,000 AA meetings are held every week in the United States (Box 1).1-7 Recognizing the differences between the groups in your area will help you guide your patients to the best match.

In prescribing a 12-step program, consider these six patient factors: socioeconomic status, gender, age, attitude towards spirituality, smoking status, and drug of choice.

Box 1

12-STEP THERAPY: AN AMERICAN ‘RELIGION’

More than 50,000 AA meetings, 20,000 NA meetings, and at least 15,000 Alanon/Alateen meetings are held every week in the United States. Other 12-step fellowships that model the AA approach include Gamblers Anonymous, Sex and Love Addicts Anonymous, Overeaters Anonymous, Cocaine Anonymous, Smokers Anonymous, Debtors Anonymous, Dual Recovery Anonymous, and Co-dependence Anonymous.

The combined membership of AA, NA, and Alanon/Alateen is approximately 2 million. To put this in perspective, if the 12-step approach was a religion—as some have proposed1 —it would have more U.S. congregants than Buddhism and Hinduism combined.

Although 12-step therapy has been a central tenet of community-based substance abuse treatment for more than 50 years,2 only recently has it become a focus of clinical research. Two major national multicenter clinical trials3,4 and several important but smaller clinical studies5-7 have found that 12-step-oriented therapies achieve modestly better abstinence rates than the psychotherapies with which they were compared.

Socioeconomic status

Matching patients with meetings according to socioeconomic status is not elitist—it’s pragmatic. Patients generally feel most comfortable and relate most readily at meetings where they feel they have something in common with the other members. For example, when a newly recovering middle-class alcoholic visits an AA group that is frequented by homeless and unemployed alcoholics, chances are that he will become more ambivalent about attending meetings. After all, he was never “that bad.”

A good practice is to give your patients an up-to-date 12-step meeting directory (Box 2). Suggest that they identify the meetings where they think they will feel most comfortable, based on the neighborhoods in which they are held.

Patients in early recovery often are terrified of encountering someone they know at a 12-step meeting. One strategy for patients concerned about protecting their anonymity—as many are—is to attend meetings outside their own neighborhoods but still in areas that match their socioeconomic status. Similarly, referring patients to meetings that are “closed to members only” might reduce their concerns about exposure.

Once a patient has connected with a 12-step program, matching by socioeconomic status becomes less important. Many begin to see similarities between themselves and other addicted individuals from all walks of life. In the beginning, however, similarities attract.

Your patient’s gender

Though women were once a small minority in AA and Narcotics Anonymous (NA), today they make up about one-third of AA’s membership and more than 40% of NA.8 One factor that may have boosted the number of women attending 12-step programs is the increased availability of women-only meetings.

Most cities have women-only meetings, and they generally will be a good place for your female patients to begin. Evidence indicates that gender-specific treatment enhances treatment outcomes.9,10 Women-only meetings tend to be smaller than mixed groups, and the senior members are often particularly willing to welcome newcomers.

Although it is severely frowned upon, the phenomenon of AA or NA members attempting to become romantically or sexually involved with a newcomer is common enough that 12-step members have coined a term for it: “13-stepping.” Newly recovering patients are often emotionally vulnerable and at risk of becoming enmeshed in a potentially destructive relationship. Beginning recovery in gender-specific meetings helps to reduce this risk.

Your patient’s age

A 12-step meeting dominated by people with gray, blue, or no hair can quickly put off teens and young adults in early recovery. Though these meetings with older members are likely to include persons who have achieved long-term and healthy recovery (making such meetings ideal territory for finding a sponsor), finding peers of a similar age is also important.

 

 

Meetings intended for young people are identified in 12-step meeting directories, but many of these “young peoples’ ” meetings have a preponderance of members older than 30—quite ancient by a 16-year-old’s standards. Conversely, some generic 12-step meetings might have a cadre of teenagers that attend regularly—at least for a while.

In AA and NA, teens and young adults tend to travel in nomadic packs, linger for a few months, then move on. For this reason, having contacts familiar with the characteristics of local meetings can be invaluable as you try to match a younger patient with a 12-step meeting.

Attitude toward spirituality

One of patients’ most common complaints about 12-step meetings is their surprise at how “religious” the programs are. Insiders are quick to point out that 12-step programs are “spiritual” and not “religious,” but the distinction is moot to patients who are uneasy with this aspect of meetings. The talk about “God as I understand Him,” the opening and closing of meetings with prayers, and the generous adoption of Judeo-Christian practices can rub agnostic, atheistic, and otherwise spiritually indifferent patients the wrong way.

To protect your patients from being blind-sided, review with them some of the spiritual practices employed in 12-step programs before they attend their first meeting:

  • Meetings begin with reading the Twelve Steps (Box 3) and other 12-step literature; all readings are peppered with spiritually-loaded words such as “God,” “Higher Power,” “prayer,” and “meditation.”
  • Meetings end with a prayer in which the group stands and holds hands (in AA) or links their arms in a huddle (NA). [I advise patients who might find this activity intolerable to duck out to the rest room 5 minutes before the meeting ends.]
  • Group leaders typically collect donations by passing the basket.

Certain meetings have a particularly heavy spiritual focus and might be appropriately prescribed for patients hungering for spiritual growth. But for patients who have had toxic encounters with religion or otherwise are ill-at-ease with spirituality or religious matters, starting out at one of the more spiritually hardcore 12-step meetings could be overwhelming. While your 12-step contact person is your best guide in these matters, the following points also apply:

  • Meetings listed as “11th Step” or “God as I understand Him” meetings will have a strong spiritual focus.
  • Meetings held on Sunday mornings often have the express purpose of focusing on spirituality.
  • “Step” meetings generally have a more spiritual focus, as 11 of the 12 steps are aimed at eliciting a “spiritual awakening.”
  • “Speaker” or “topic discussion” meetings tend to have a less spiritual focus, though this will vary with the meeting chairperson’s preferences.
  • “Beginners” meetings, when available, are intended for new members and devote more time to helping the newcomer understand the 12-step approach to spirituality.

Box 2

TOOLS FOR MAKING 12-STEP MEETING REFERRALS

Unless you regularly attend 12-step meetings, it is impossible to know which groups would be the best match for your patients. Here are suggestions for matching your patient’s needs with local 12-step meetings:

  • Use fellowship directories. All 12-step fellowships maintain directories of where and when meetings are held and whether meetings are nonsmoking or have other restrictions (e.g., gay-only, women-only). For directories, call local AA and NA fellowships (in the phone book’s white pages).
  • Develop a 12-step contact list. Rehabilitation centers often have counselors on staff who are familiar with local 12-step meetings and can recommend those that match your patients’ characteristics. Counselors who are active AA or NA members can be a valuable resource in identifying subtle differences in meetings.
  • Locate 12-step meetings for impaired professionals. Special 12-step meetings for nurses, physicians, and pharmacists are held in many cities. For technical reasons, these are not “official”12-step meetings and are not listed in 12-step directories. Times and locations can generally be obtained from local medical societies, impaired-professional programs, or treatment centers.

Box 3

THE 12 STEPS OF ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS

  1. We admitted we were powerless over alcohol—that our lives had become unmanageable.
  2. Cameto believe that a Power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity.
  3. Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood Him.
  4. Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves.
  5. Admitted to God, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs.
  6. Were entirely ready to have God remove all these defects of character.
  7. Humbly asked Him to remove our shortcomings.
  8. Made a list of all persons we had harmed, and became willing to make amends to them all.
  9. Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would injure them or others.
  10. Continued to take personal inventory and when we were wrong promptly admitted it.
  11. Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with God as we understood Him, praying only for knowledge of His will for us and the power to carry that out.
  12. Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps, we tried to carry this message to alcoholics and to practice these principles in all our affairs.

Source: Alcoholics Anonymous

 

 

AA’s main text, the so-called “Big Book” (its real title is: Alcoholics Anonymous7) has a chapter titled, “We Agnostics.” AA has many long-time members who have found support in the fellowship but never “found God” or a belief in a higher power other than the fellowship itself. These secular 12-step members demonstrate one of the many ironies of AA and NA—that spiritual fellowships can work even for individuals who reject spirituality.

Patients who resist spirituality are advised to “take what you can use” from the fellowship and “leave the rest.” While 12-step members will propose that the newcomer keep an open mind about spirituality, patients should also be assured that a seat is always waiting for them, regardless.

Whether your patient smokes

Most 12-step meetings today are smoke-free, not because of enlightenment within the fellowships but because meetings are usually held in churches, synagogues, and health care facilities where smoking is banned. The perception that attending 12-step meetings can be harmful to your health is out-of-date. Nonetheless, because most meetings have banned smoking, the few in which smoking is allowed are thick with smoke.

In general, 12-step clubhouses are among the holdouts where smoking is allowed during and after meetings. A clubhouse is typically a storefront rented or acquired by AA/NA members where meetings are held around the clock. Given the evidence that quitting smoking may improve overall health,10,11 patients should be encouraged to begin their involvement in smoke-free fellowships, which are identified in 12-step directories.

Your patient’s drug of choice

As its name implies, AA is intended for persons who desire to stop drinking. In practice, however, much of AA’s membership is addicted to more than one substance, and—in some cases—the drug of choice might not be alcohol.

Narcotics Anonymous—contrary to what its name implies—is for individuals addicted to any drug, not just narcotics. Patients generally should be advised to join the fellowship (AA or NA) that best matches their substance use history. There is, however, at least one exception that might best be illustrated with an example:

After I recommended NA meetings to a middle-class nurse addicted to analgesics, she returned for her next appointment quite angry. She attended three different NA meetings, and “all of the members were either heroin or crack cocaine addicts.” It seemed to her that all of them were on probation or parole. She was very uncomfortable throughout the meetings and upset with my recommendation.

In matching patients with meetings, socioeconomic and cultural factors take precedence over biochemistry. At the neuronal level, a nurse addicted to analgesics has a lot in common with a heroin addict, but her ability to relate to another recovering person—particularly in early recovery—may be limited. Arguing with my patient or countering that other nurses were probably at the meetings she attended would not have eased her reluctance to return to NA or helped our therapeutic alliance.

NA meetings are generally attended by individuals addicted to illicit drugs: amphetamines, crack cocaine, cannabis, and heroin. In larger cities, other 12-step fellowships may focus on specific drugs, such as cocaine, but these are rare. Just as individuals addicted to prescription narcotics are a minority in the treatment population, they are also a minority in NA.

For this reason, our prior recommendation—to match patients to meetings based on socioeconomic status—applies. It’s good policy to recommend that patients addicted to prescription medications try both AA and NA meetings and decide where they feel most comfortable.

The third tradition of AA states, “the only requirement for AA membership is a desire to stop drinking.” Though a purist might suggest that our analgesics-dependent nurse should join NA, her need to connect culturally with similar persons in recovery argues strongly for her to blend in at open AA meetings. A social drinker who never fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for alcohol dependence, she will have a better chance of abstaining from analgesics if she abstains from alcohol as well. For this reason, she should qualify for AA membership because she does, in fact, have “a desire to stop drinking.”

Some professionals addicted to prescription drugs will feel at home in NA meetings, whereas others will react as my patient did. Having access to a 12-step contact person who knows about the demographics of local NA meetings can help you make the best patient/meeting match.

Related resources

References

1. The Church of God Anonymous (religion of the 12-step movement) http://www.churchofgodanonymous.org/index2.html

2. White W. Slaying the Dragon Bloomington, IL: Chestnut Health Systems, 1998.

3. Crits-Christoph P, Siqueland L, Blaine J, et al. Psychosocial treatments for cocaine dependence: National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999;57(6):493-502.

4. Project Match. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. J Studies Alcohol 1997;58(1):7-29.

5. Ouimette PC, Finney JW, Moos RH. Twelve-step and cognitive-behavioral treatment for substance abuse: A comparison of treatment effectiveness. J Consult Clin Psychology 1997;65:230-40.

6. Morgenstern J, Blanchard KA, Morgan TJ, Labouvie E, Hayaki J. Testing the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral treatment for substance abuse in a community setting: Within treatment and post-treatment findings. J Consult Clin Psychology 2001;69:1007-17.

7. Alcoholics Anonymous (3rd ed). New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Service, 1976.

8. Emrick CD, Tonigan SJ, Montgomery H, Little L. Alcoholics Anonymous: what is currently known. In: McCrady BS, Miller WR (eds). Research on Alcoholics Anonymous New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center on Alcohol Studies Publications, 1993:45.

9. Blume S. Addiction in women. In: Galanter M, Kleber HD (eds). Textbook of substance abuse treatment (2nd ed). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1999;485-91.

10. Jarvis TJ. Implications of gender for alcohol treatment research: a quantitative and qualitative review. Br J Addiction 1992;87:1249-61.

11. Bobo JK, McIlvain HE, Lando HA, Walker RD, Leed-Kelly A. Effect of smoking cessation counseling on recovery from alcoholism: findings from a randomized community intervention trial. Addiction 1998;93:877-87.

12. Burling TA, Marshall GD, Seidner AL. Smoking cessation for substance abuse inpatients. J Subs Abuse 1991;3(3):269-76.

References

1. The Church of God Anonymous (religion of the 12-step movement) http://www.churchofgodanonymous.org/index2.html

2. White W. Slaying the Dragon Bloomington, IL: Chestnut Health Systems, 1998.

3. Crits-Christoph P, Siqueland L, Blaine J, et al. Psychosocial treatments for cocaine dependence: National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999;57(6):493-502.

4. Project Match. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. J Studies Alcohol 1997;58(1):7-29.

5. Ouimette PC, Finney JW, Moos RH. Twelve-step and cognitive-behavioral treatment for substance abuse: A comparison of treatment effectiveness. J Consult Clin Psychology 1997;65:230-40.

6. Morgenstern J, Blanchard KA, Morgan TJ, Labouvie E, Hayaki J. Testing the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral treatment for substance abuse in a community setting: Within treatment and post-treatment findings. J Consult Clin Psychology 2001;69:1007-17.

7. Alcoholics Anonymous (3rd ed). New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Service, 1976.

8. Emrick CD, Tonigan SJ, Montgomery H, Little L. Alcoholics Anonymous: what is currently known. In: McCrady BS, Miller WR (eds). Research on Alcoholics Anonymous New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center on Alcohol Studies Publications, 1993:45.

9. Blume S. Addiction in women. In: Galanter M, Kleber HD (eds). Textbook of substance abuse treatment (2nd ed). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1999;485-91.

10. Jarvis TJ. Implications of gender for alcohol treatment research: a quantitative and qualitative review. Br J Addiction 1992;87:1249-61.

11. Bobo JK, McIlvain HE, Lando HA, Walker RD, Leed-Kelly A. Effect of smoking cessation counseling on recovery from alcoholism: findings from a randomized community intervention trial. Addiction 1998;93:877-87.

12. Burling TA, Marshall GD, Seidner AL. Smoking cessation for substance abuse inpatients. J Subs Abuse 1991;3(3):269-76.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 01(10)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 01(10)
Page Number
16-24
Page Number
16-24
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
One AA meeting doesn’t fit all: 6 keys to prescribing 12-step programs
Display Headline
One AA meeting doesn’t fit all: 6 keys to prescribing 12-step programs
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

One AA meeting doesn’t fit all: 6 keys to prescribing 12-step programs

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/11/2018 - 15:12
Display Headline
One AA meeting doesn’t fit all: 6 keys to prescribing 12-step programs

“Honestly, all that religious talk turned me off.”

“The meeting was like sitting in a chimney – I practically choked to death.”

“I was the only person there without a tattoo.”

Attending the wrong 12-step meeting can turn off some patients, despite the substance abuse treatment support offered by Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and similar programs. Because of the stigma associated with alcohol or drug addiction, most patients are ambivalent at best about attending their first 12-step meetings. Feeling “out of place”—the most common turn-off—can transform this ambivalence into adamant resistance.

Simply advising an addicted patient to “call AA” is tantamount to giving a depressed patient a copy of the Physicians’ Desk Reference and telling him or her to pick an antidepressant. Not all 12-step meetings are alike; 50,000 AA meetings are held every week in the United States (Box 1).1-7 Recognizing the differences between the groups in your area will help you guide your patients to the best match.

In prescribing a 12-step program, consider these six patient factors: socioeconomic status, gender, age, attitude towards spirituality, smoking status, and drug of choice.

Box 1

12-STEP THERAPY: AN AMERICAN ‘RELIGION’

More than 50,000 AA meetings, 20,000 NA meetings, and at least 15,000 Alanon/Alateen meetings are held every week in the United States. Other 12-step fellowships that model the AA approach include Gamblers Anonymous, Sex and Love Addicts Anonymous, Overeaters Anonymous, Cocaine Anonymous, Smokers Anonymous, Debtors Anonymous, Dual Recovery Anonymous, and Co-dependence Anonymous.

The combined membership of AA, NA, and Alanon/Alateen is approximately 2 million. To put this in perspective, if the 12-step approach was a religion—as some have proposed1 —it would have more U.S. congregants than Buddhism and Hinduism combined.

Although 12-step therapy has been a central tenet of community-based substance abuse treatment for more than 50 years,2 only recently has it become a focus of clinical research. Two major national multicenter clinical trials3,4 and several important but smaller clinical studies5-7 have found that 12-step-oriented therapies achieve modestly better abstinence rates than the psychotherapies with which they were compared.

Socioeconomic status

Matching patients with meetings according to socioeconomic status is not elitist—it’s pragmatic. Patients generally feel most comfortable and relate most readily at meetings where they feel they have something in common with the other members. For example, when a newly recovering middle-class alcoholic visits an AA group that is frequented by homeless and unemployed alcoholics, chances are that he will become more ambivalent about attending meetings. After all, he was never “that bad.”

A good practice is to give your patients an up-to-date 12-step meeting directory (Box 2). Suggest that they identify the meetings where they think they will feel most comfortable, based on the neighborhoods in which they are held.

Patients in early recovery often are terrified of encountering someone they know at a 12-step meeting. One strategy for patients concerned about protecting their anonymity—as many are—is to attend meetings outside their own neighborhoods but still in areas that match their socioeconomic status. Similarly, referring patients to meetings that are “closed to members only” might reduce their concerns about exposure.

Once a patient has connected with a 12-step program, matching by socioeconomic status becomes less important. Many begin to see similarities between themselves and other addicted individuals from all walks of life. In the beginning, however, similarities attract.

Your patient’s gender

Though women were once a small minority in AA and Narcotics Anonymous (NA), today they make up about one-third of AA’s membership and more than 40% of NA.8 One factor that may have boosted the number of women attending 12-step programs is the increased availability of women-only meetings.

Most cities have women-only meetings, and they generally will be a good place for your female patients to begin. Evidence indicates that gender-specific treatment enhances treatment outcomes.9,10 Women-only meetings tend to be smaller than mixed groups, and the senior members are often particularly willing to welcome newcomers.

Although it is severely frowned upon, the phenomenon of AA or NA members attempting to become romantically or sexually involved with a newcomer is common enough that 12-step members have coined a term for it: “13-stepping.” Newly recovering patients are often emotionally vulnerable and at risk of becoming enmeshed in a potentially destructive relationship. Beginning recovery in gender-specific meetings helps to reduce this risk.

Your patient’s age

A 12-step meeting dominated by people with gray, blue, or no hair can quickly put off teens and young adults in early recovery. Though these meetings with older members are likely to include persons who have achieved long-term and healthy recovery (making such meetings ideal territory for finding a sponsor), finding peers of a similar age is also important.

 

 

Meetings intended for young people are identified in 12-step meeting directories, but many of these “young peoples’ ” meetings have a preponderance of members older than 30—quite ancient by a 16-year-old’s standards. Conversely, some generic 12-step meetings might have a cadre of teenagers that attend regularly—at least for a while.

In AA and NA, teens and young adults tend to travel in nomadic packs, linger for a few months, then move on. For this reason, having contacts familiar with the characteristics of local meetings can be invaluable as you try to match a younger patient with a 12-step meeting.

Attitude toward spirituality

One of patients’ most common complaints about 12-step meetings is their surprise at how “religious” the programs are. Insiders are quick to point out that 12-step programs are “spiritual” and not “religious,” but the distinction is moot to patients who are uneasy with this aspect of meetings. The talk about “God as I understand Him,” the opening and closing of meetings with prayers, and the generous adoption of Judeo-Christian practices can rub agnostic, atheistic, and otherwise spiritually indifferent patients the wrong way.

To protect your patients from being blind-sided, review with them some of the spiritual practices employed in 12-step programs before they attend their first meeting:

  • Meetings begin with reading the Twelve Steps (Box 3) and other 12-step literature; all readings are peppered with spiritually-loaded words such as “God,” “Higher Power,” “prayer,” and “meditation.”
  • Meetings end with a prayer in which the group stands and holds hands (in AA) or links their arms in a huddle (NA). [I advise patients who might find this activity intolerable to duck out to the rest room 5 minutes before the meeting ends.]
  • Group leaders typically collect donations by passing the basket.

Certain meetings have a particularly heavy spiritual focus and might be appropriately prescribed for patients hungering for spiritual growth. But for patients who have had toxic encounters with religion or otherwise are ill-at-ease with spirituality or religious matters, starting out at one of the more spiritually hardcore 12-step meetings could be overwhelming. While your 12-step contact person is your best guide in these matters, the following points also apply:

  • Meetings listed as “11th Step” or “God as I understand Him” meetings will have a strong spiritual focus.
  • Meetings held on Sunday mornings often have the express purpose of focusing on spirituality.
  • “Step” meetings generally have a more spiritual focus, as 11 of the 12 steps are aimed at eliciting a “spiritual awakening.”
  • “Speaker” or “topic discussion” meetings tend to have a less spiritual focus, though this will vary with the meeting chairperson’s preferences.
  • “Beginners” meetings, when available, are intended for new members and devote more time to helping the newcomer understand the 12-step approach to spirituality.

Box 2

TOOLS FOR MAKING 12-STEP MEETING REFERRALS

Unless you regularly attend 12-step meetings, it is impossible to know which groups would be the best match for your patients. Here are suggestions for matching your patient’s needs with local 12-step meetings:

  • Use fellowship directories. All 12-step fellowships maintain directories of where and when meetings are held and whether meetings are nonsmoking or have other restrictions (e.g., gay-only, women-only). For directories, call local AA and NA fellowships (in the phone book’s white pages).
  • Develop a 12-step contact list. Rehabilitation centers often have counselors on staff who are familiar with local 12-step meetings and can recommend those that match your patients’ characteristics. Counselors who are active AA or NA members can be a valuable resource in identifying subtle differences in meetings.
  • Locate 12-step meetings for impaired professionals. Special 12-step meetings for nurses, physicians, and pharmacists are held in many cities. For technical reasons, these are not “official”12-step meetings and are not listed in 12-step directories. Times and locations can generally be obtained from local medical societies, impaired-professional programs, or treatment centers.

Box 3

THE 12 STEPS OF ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS

  1. We admitted we were powerless over alcohol—that our lives had become unmanageable.
  2. Cameto believe that a Power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity.
  3. Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood Him.
  4. Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves.
  5. Admitted to God, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs.
  6. Were entirely ready to have God remove all these defects of character.
  7. Humbly asked Him to remove our shortcomings.
  8. Made a list of all persons we had harmed, and became willing to make amends to them all.
  9. Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would injure them or others.
  10. Continued to take personal inventory and when we were wrong promptly admitted it.
  11. Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with God as we understood Him, praying only for knowledge of His will for us and the power to carry that out.
  12. Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps, we tried to carry this message to alcoholics and to practice these principles in all our affairs.

Source: Alcoholics Anonymous

 

 

AA’s main text, the so-called “Big Book” (its real title is: Alcoholics Anonymous7) has a chapter titled, “We Agnostics.” AA has many long-time members who have found support in the fellowship but never “found God” or a belief in a higher power other than the fellowship itself. These secular 12-step members demonstrate one of the many ironies of AA and NA—that spiritual fellowships can work even for individuals who reject spirituality.

Patients who resist spirituality are advised to “take what you can use” from the fellowship and “leave the rest.” While 12-step members will propose that the newcomer keep an open mind about spirituality, patients should also be assured that a seat is always waiting for them, regardless.

Whether your patient smokes

Most 12-step meetings today are smoke-free, not because of enlightenment within the fellowships but because meetings are usually held in churches, synagogues, and health care facilities where smoking is banned. The perception that attending 12-step meetings can be harmful to your health is out-of-date. Nonetheless, because most meetings have banned smoking, the few in which smoking is allowed are thick with smoke.

In general, 12-step clubhouses are among the holdouts where smoking is allowed during and after meetings. A clubhouse is typically a storefront rented or acquired by AA/NA members where meetings are held around the clock. Given the evidence that quitting smoking may improve overall health,10,11 patients should be encouraged to begin their involvement in smoke-free fellowships, which are identified in 12-step directories.

Your patient’s drug of choice

As its name implies, AA is intended for persons who desire to stop drinking. In practice, however, much of AA’s membership is addicted to more than one substance, and—in some cases—the drug of choice might not be alcohol.

Narcotics Anonymous—contrary to what its name implies—is for individuals addicted to any drug, not just narcotics. Patients generally should be advised to join the fellowship (AA or NA) that best matches their substance use history. There is, however, at least one exception that might best be illustrated with an example:

After I recommended NA meetings to a middle-class nurse addicted to analgesics, she returned for her next appointment quite angry. She attended three different NA meetings, and “all of the members were either heroin or crack cocaine addicts.” It seemed to her that all of them were on probation or parole. She was very uncomfortable throughout the meetings and upset with my recommendation.

In matching patients with meetings, socioeconomic and cultural factors take precedence over biochemistry. At the neuronal level, a nurse addicted to analgesics has a lot in common with a heroin addict, but her ability to relate to another recovering person—particularly in early recovery—may be limited. Arguing with my patient or countering that other nurses were probably at the meetings she attended would not have eased her reluctance to return to NA or helped our therapeutic alliance.

NA meetings are generally attended by individuals addicted to illicit drugs: amphetamines, crack cocaine, cannabis, and heroin. In larger cities, other 12-step fellowships may focus on specific drugs, such as cocaine, but these are rare. Just as individuals addicted to prescription narcotics are a minority in the treatment population, they are also a minority in NA.

For this reason, our prior recommendation—to match patients to meetings based on socioeconomic status—applies. It’s good policy to recommend that patients addicted to prescription medications try both AA and NA meetings and decide where they feel most comfortable.

The third tradition of AA states, “the only requirement for AA membership is a desire to stop drinking.” Though a purist might suggest that our analgesics-dependent nurse should join NA, her need to connect culturally with similar persons in recovery argues strongly for her to blend in at open AA meetings. A social drinker who never fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for alcohol dependence, she will have a better chance of abstaining from analgesics if she abstains from alcohol as well. For this reason, she should qualify for AA membership because she does, in fact, have “a desire to stop drinking.”

Some professionals addicted to prescription drugs will feel at home in NA meetings, whereas others will react as my patient did. Having access to a 12-step contact person who knows about the demographics of local NA meetings can help you make the best patient/meeting match.

Related resources

References

1. The Church of God Anonymous (religion of the 12-step movement) http://www.churchofgodanonymous.org/index2.html

2. White W. Slaying the Dragon Bloomington, IL: Chestnut Health Systems, 1998.

3. Crits-Christoph P, Siqueland L, Blaine J, et al. Psychosocial treatments for cocaine dependence: National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999;57(6):493-502.

4. Project Match. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. J Studies Alcohol 1997;58(1):7-29.

5. Ouimette PC, Finney JW, Moos RH. Twelve-step and cognitive-behavioral treatment for substance abuse: A comparison of treatment effectiveness. J Consult Clin Psychology 1997;65:230-40.

6. Morgenstern J, Blanchard KA, Morgan TJ, Labouvie E, Hayaki J. Testing the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral treatment for substance abuse in a community setting: Within treatment and post-treatment findings. J Consult Clin Psychology 2001;69:1007-17.

7. Alcoholics Anonymous (3rd ed). New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Service, 1976.

8. Emrick CD, Tonigan SJ, Montgomery H, Little L. Alcoholics Anonymous: what is currently known. In: McCrady BS, Miller WR (eds). Research on Alcoholics Anonymous New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center on Alcohol Studies Publications, 1993:45.

9. Blume S. Addiction in women. In: Galanter M, Kleber HD (eds). Textbook of substance abuse treatment (2nd ed). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1999;485-91.

10. Jarvis TJ. Implications of gender for alcohol treatment research: a quantitative and qualitative review. Br J Addiction 1992;87:1249-61.

11. Bobo JK, McIlvain HE, Lando HA, Walker RD, Leed-Kelly A. Effect of smoking cessation counseling on recovery from alcoholism: findings from a randomized community intervention trial. Addiction 1998;93:877-87.

12. Burling TA, Marshall GD, Seidner AL. Smoking cessation for substance abuse inpatients. J Subs Abuse 1991;3(3):269-76.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Robert F. Forman, PhD
Assistant professor of psychology in psychiatry Treatment Research Institute University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 01(10)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
16-24
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Robert F. Forman, PhD
Assistant professor of psychology in psychiatry Treatment Research Institute University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

Author and Disclosure Information

Robert F. Forman, PhD
Assistant professor of psychology in psychiatry Treatment Research Institute University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

Article PDF
Article PDF

“Honestly, all that religious talk turned me off.”

“The meeting was like sitting in a chimney – I practically choked to death.”

“I was the only person there without a tattoo.”

Attending the wrong 12-step meeting can turn off some patients, despite the substance abuse treatment support offered by Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and similar programs. Because of the stigma associated with alcohol or drug addiction, most patients are ambivalent at best about attending their first 12-step meetings. Feeling “out of place”—the most common turn-off—can transform this ambivalence into adamant resistance.

Simply advising an addicted patient to “call AA” is tantamount to giving a depressed patient a copy of the Physicians’ Desk Reference and telling him or her to pick an antidepressant. Not all 12-step meetings are alike; 50,000 AA meetings are held every week in the United States (Box 1).1-7 Recognizing the differences between the groups in your area will help you guide your patients to the best match.

In prescribing a 12-step program, consider these six patient factors: socioeconomic status, gender, age, attitude towards spirituality, smoking status, and drug of choice.

Box 1

12-STEP THERAPY: AN AMERICAN ‘RELIGION’

More than 50,000 AA meetings, 20,000 NA meetings, and at least 15,000 Alanon/Alateen meetings are held every week in the United States. Other 12-step fellowships that model the AA approach include Gamblers Anonymous, Sex and Love Addicts Anonymous, Overeaters Anonymous, Cocaine Anonymous, Smokers Anonymous, Debtors Anonymous, Dual Recovery Anonymous, and Co-dependence Anonymous.

The combined membership of AA, NA, and Alanon/Alateen is approximately 2 million. To put this in perspective, if the 12-step approach was a religion—as some have proposed1 —it would have more U.S. congregants than Buddhism and Hinduism combined.

Although 12-step therapy has been a central tenet of community-based substance abuse treatment for more than 50 years,2 only recently has it become a focus of clinical research. Two major national multicenter clinical trials3,4 and several important but smaller clinical studies5-7 have found that 12-step-oriented therapies achieve modestly better abstinence rates than the psychotherapies with which they were compared.

Socioeconomic status

Matching patients with meetings according to socioeconomic status is not elitist—it’s pragmatic. Patients generally feel most comfortable and relate most readily at meetings where they feel they have something in common with the other members. For example, when a newly recovering middle-class alcoholic visits an AA group that is frequented by homeless and unemployed alcoholics, chances are that he will become more ambivalent about attending meetings. After all, he was never “that bad.”

A good practice is to give your patients an up-to-date 12-step meeting directory (Box 2). Suggest that they identify the meetings where they think they will feel most comfortable, based on the neighborhoods in which they are held.

Patients in early recovery often are terrified of encountering someone they know at a 12-step meeting. One strategy for patients concerned about protecting their anonymity—as many are—is to attend meetings outside their own neighborhoods but still in areas that match their socioeconomic status. Similarly, referring patients to meetings that are “closed to members only” might reduce their concerns about exposure.

Once a patient has connected with a 12-step program, matching by socioeconomic status becomes less important. Many begin to see similarities between themselves and other addicted individuals from all walks of life. In the beginning, however, similarities attract.

Your patient’s gender

Though women were once a small minority in AA and Narcotics Anonymous (NA), today they make up about one-third of AA’s membership and more than 40% of NA.8 One factor that may have boosted the number of women attending 12-step programs is the increased availability of women-only meetings.

Most cities have women-only meetings, and they generally will be a good place for your female patients to begin. Evidence indicates that gender-specific treatment enhances treatment outcomes.9,10 Women-only meetings tend to be smaller than mixed groups, and the senior members are often particularly willing to welcome newcomers.

Although it is severely frowned upon, the phenomenon of AA or NA members attempting to become romantically or sexually involved with a newcomer is common enough that 12-step members have coined a term for it: “13-stepping.” Newly recovering patients are often emotionally vulnerable and at risk of becoming enmeshed in a potentially destructive relationship. Beginning recovery in gender-specific meetings helps to reduce this risk.

Your patient’s age

A 12-step meeting dominated by people with gray, blue, or no hair can quickly put off teens and young adults in early recovery. Though these meetings with older members are likely to include persons who have achieved long-term and healthy recovery (making such meetings ideal territory for finding a sponsor), finding peers of a similar age is also important.

 

 

Meetings intended for young people are identified in 12-step meeting directories, but many of these “young peoples’ ” meetings have a preponderance of members older than 30—quite ancient by a 16-year-old’s standards. Conversely, some generic 12-step meetings might have a cadre of teenagers that attend regularly—at least for a while.

In AA and NA, teens and young adults tend to travel in nomadic packs, linger for a few months, then move on. For this reason, having contacts familiar with the characteristics of local meetings can be invaluable as you try to match a younger patient with a 12-step meeting.

Attitude toward spirituality

One of patients’ most common complaints about 12-step meetings is their surprise at how “religious” the programs are. Insiders are quick to point out that 12-step programs are “spiritual” and not “religious,” but the distinction is moot to patients who are uneasy with this aspect of meetings. The talk about “God as I understand Him,” the opening and closing of meetings with prayers, and the generous adoption of Judeo-Christian practices can rub agnostic, atheistic, and otherwise spiritually indifferent patients the wrong way.

To protect your patients from being blind-sided, review with them some of the spiritual practices employed in 12-step programs before they attend their first meeting:

  • Meetings begin with reading the Twelve Steps (Box 3) and other 12-step literature; all readings are peppered with spiritually-loaded words such as “God,” “Higher Power,” “prayer,” and “meditation.”
  • Meetings end with a prayer in which the group stands and holds hands (in AA) or links their arms in a huddle (NA). [I advise patients who might find this activity intolerable to duck out to the rest room 5 minutes before the meeting ends.]
  • Group leaders typically collect donations by passing the basket.

Certain meetings have a particularly heavy spiritual focus and might be appropriately prescribed for patients hungering for spiritual growth. But for patients who have had toxic encounters with religion or otherwise are ill-at-ease with spirituality or religious matters, starting out at one of the more spiritually hardcore 12-step meetings could be overwhelming. While your 12-step contact person is your best guide in these matters, the following points also apply:

  • Meetings listed as “11th Step” or “God as I understand Him” meetings will have a strong spiritual focus.
  • Meetings held on Sunday mornings often have the express purpose of focusing on spirituality.
  • “Step” meetings generally have a more spiritual focus, as 11 of the 12 steps are aimed at eliciting a “spiritual awakening.”
  • “Speaker” or “topic discussion” meetings tend to have a less spiritual focus, though this will vary with the meeting chairperson’s preferences.
  • “Beginners” meetings, when available, are intended for new members and devote more time to helping the newcomer understand the 12-step approach to spirituality.

Box 2

TOOLS FOR MAKING 12-STEP MEETING REFERRALS

Unless you regularly attend 12-step meetings, it is impossible to know which groups would be the best match for your patients. Here are suggestions for matching your patient’s needs with local 12-step meetings:

  • Use fellowship directories. All 12-step fellowships maintain directories of where and when meetings are held and whether meetings are nonsmoking or have other restrictions (e.g., gay-only, women-only). For directories, call local AA and NA fellowships (in the phone book’s white pages).
  • Develop a 12-step contact list. Rehabilitation centers often have counselors on staff who are familiar with local 12-step meetings and can recommend those that match your patients’ characteristics. Counselors who are active AA or NA members can be a valuable resource in identifying subtle differences in meetings.
  • Locate 12-step meetings for impaired professionals. Special 12-step meetings for nurses, physicians, and pharmacists are held in many cities. For technical reasons, these are not “official”12-step meetings and are not listed in 12-step directories. Times and locations can generally be obtained from local medical societies, impaired-professional programs, or treatment centers.

Box 3

THE 12 STEPS OF ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS

  1. We admitted we were powerless over alcohol—that our lives had become unmanageable.
  2. Cameto believe that a Power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity.
  3. Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood Him.
  4. Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves.
  5. Admitted to God, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs.
  6. Were entirely ready to have God remove all these defects of character.
  7. Humbly asked Him to remove our shortcomings.
  8. Made a list of all persons we had harmed, and became willing to make amends to them all.
  9. Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would injure them or others.
  10. Continued to take personal inventory and when we were wrong promptly admitted it.
  11. Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with God as we understood Him, praying only for knowledge of His will for us and the power to carry that out.
  12. Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps, we tried to carry this message to alcoholics and to practice these principles in all our affairs.

Source: Alcoholics Anonymous

 

 

AA’s main text, the so-called “Big Book” (its real title is: Alcoholics Anonymous7) has a chapter titled, “We Agnostics.” AA has many long-time members who have found support in the fellowship but never “found God” or a belief in a higher power other than the fellowship itself. These secular 12-step members demonstrate one of the many ironies of AA and NA—that spiritual fellowships can work even for individuals who reject spirituality.

Patients who resist spirituality are advised to “take what you can use” from the fellowship and “leave the rest.” While 12-step members will propose that the newcomer keep an open mind about spirituality, patients should also be assured that a seat is always waiting for them, regardless.

Whether your patient smokes

Most 12-step meetings today are smoke-free, not because of enlightenment within the fellowships but because meetings are usually held in churches, synagogues, and health care facilities where smoking is banned. The perception that attending 12-step meetings can be harmful to your health is out-of-date. Nonetheless, because most meetings have banned smoking, the few in which smoking is allowed are thick with smoke.

In general, 12-step clubhouses are among the holdouts where smoking is allowed during and after meetings. A clubhouse is typically a storefront rented or acquired by AA/NA members where meetings are held around the clock. Given the evidence that quitting smoking may improve overall health,10,11 patients should be encouraged to begin their involvement in smoke-free fellowships, which are identified in 12-step directories.

Your patient’s drug of choice

As its name implies, AA is intended for persons who desire to stop drinking. In practice, however, much of AA’s membership is addicted to more than one substance, and—in some cases—the drug of choice might not be alcohol.

Narcotics Anonymous—contrary to what its name implies—is for individuals addicted to any drug, not just narcotics. Patients generally should be advised to join the fellowship (AA or NA) that best matches their substance use history. There is, however, at least one exception that might best be illustrated with an example:

After I recommended NA meetings to a middle-class nurse addicted to analgesics, she returned for her next appointment quite angry. She attended three different NA meetings, and “all of the members were either heroin or crack cocaine addicts.” It seemed to her that all of them were on probation or parole. She was very uncomfortable throughout the meetings and upset with my recommendation.

In matching patients with meetings, socioeconomic and cultural factors take precedence over biochemistry. At the neuronal level, a nurse addicted to analgesics has a lot in common with a heroin addict, but her ability to relate to another recovering person—particularly in early recovery—may be limited. Arguing with my patient or countering that other nurses were probably at the meetings she attended would not have eased her reluctance to return to NA or helped our therapeutic alliance.

NA meetings are generally attended by individuals addicted to illicit drugs: amphetamines, crack cocaine, cannabis, and heroin. In larger cities, other 12-step fellowships may focus on specific drugs, such as cocaine, but these are rare. Just as individuals addicted to prescription narcotics are a minority in the treatment population, they are also a minority in NA.

For this reason, our prior recommendation—to match patients to meetings based on socioeconomic status—applies. It’s good policy to recommend that patients addicted to prescription medications try both AA and NA meetings and decide where they feel most comfortable.

The third tradition of AA states, “the only requirement for AA membership is a desire to stop drinking.” Though a purist might suggest that our analgesics-dependent nurse should join NA, her need to connect culturally with similar persons in recovery argues strongly for her to blend in at open AA meetings. A social drinker who never fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for alcohol dependence, she will have a better chance of abstaining from analgesics if she abstains from alcohol as well. For this reason, she should qualify for AA membership because she does, in fact, have “a desire to stop drinking.”

Some professionals addicted to prescription drugs will feel at home in NA meetings, whereas others will react as my patient did. Having access to a 12-step contact person who knows about the demographics of local NA meetings can help you make the best patient/meeting match.

Related resources

“Honestly, all that religious talk turned me off.”

“The meeting was like sitting in a chimney – I practically choked to death.”

“I was the only person there without a tattoo.”

Attending the wrong 12-step meeting can turn off some patients, despite the substance abuse treatment support offered by Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and similar programs. Because of the stigma associated with alcohol or drug addiction, most patients are ambivalent at best about attending their first 12-step meetings. Feeling “out of place”—the most common turn-off—can transform this ambivalence into adamant resistance.

Simply advising an addicted patient to “call AA” is tantamount to giving a depressed patient a copy of the Physicians’ Desk Reference and telling him or her to pick an antidepressant. Not all 12-step meetings are alike; 50,000 AA meetings are held every week in the United States (Box 1).1-7 Recognizing the differences between the groups in your area will help you guide your patients to the best match.

In prescribing a 12-step program, consider these six patient factors: socioeconomic status, gender, age, attitude towards spirituality, smoking status, and drug of choice.

Box 1

12-STEP THERAPY: AN AMERICAN ‘RELIGION’

More than 50,000 AA meetings, 20,000 NA meetings, and at least 15,000 Alanon/Alateen meetings are held every week in the United States. Other 12-step fellowships that model the AA approach include Gamblers Anonymous, Sex and Love Addicts Anonymous, Overeaters Anonymous, Cocaine Anonymous, Smokers Anonymous, Debtors Anonymous, Dual Recovery Anonymous, and Co-dependence Anonymous.

The combined membership of AA, NA, and Alanon/Alateen is approximately 2 million. To put this in perspective, if the 12-step approach was a religion—as some have proposed1 —it would have more U.S. congregants than Buddhism and Hinduism combined.

Although 12-step therapy has been a central tenet of community-based substance abuse treatment for more than 50 years,2 only recently has it become a focus of clinical research. Two major national multicenter clinical trials3,4 and several important but smaller clinical studies5-7 have found that 12-step-oriented therapies achieve modestly better abstinence rates than the psychotherapies with which they were compared.

Socioeconomic status

Matching patients with meetings according to socioeconomic status is not elitist—it’s pragmatic. Patients generally feel most comfortable and relate most readily at meetings where they feel they have something in common with the other members. For example, when a newly recovering middle-class alcoholic visits an AA group that is frequented by homeless and unemployed alcoholics, chances are that he will become more ambivalent about attending meetings. After all, he was never “that bad.”

A good practice is to give your patients an up-to-date 12-step meeting directory (Box 2). Suggest that they identify the meetings where they think they will feel most comfortable, based on the neighborhoods in which they are held.

Patients in early recovery often are terrified of encountering someone they know at a 12-step meeting. One strategy for patients concerned about protecting their anonymity—as many are—is to attend meetings outside their own neighborhoods but still in areas that match their socioeconomic status. Similarly, referring patients to meetings that are “closed to members only” might reduce their concerns about exposure.

Once a patient has connected with a 12-step program, matching by socioeconomic status becomes less important. Many begin to see similarities between themselves and other addicted individuals from all walks of life. In the beginning, however, similarities attract.

Your patient’s gender

Though women were once a small minority in AA and Narcotics Anonymous (NA), today they make up about one-third of AA’s membership and more than 40% of NA.8 One factor that may have boosted the number of women attending 12-step programs is the increased availability of women-only meetings.

Most cities have women-only meetings, and they generally will be a good place for your female patients to begin. Evidence indicates that gender-specific treatment enhances treatment outcomes.9,10 Women-only meetings tend to be smaller than mixed groups, and the senior members are often particularly willing to welcome newcomers.

Although it is severely frowned upon, the phenomenon of AA or NA members attempting to become romantically or sexually involved with a newcomer is common enough that 12-step members have coined a term for it: “13-stepping.” Newly recovering patients are often emotionally vulnerable and at risk of becoming enmeshed in a potentially destructive relationship. Beginning recovery in gender-specific meetings helps to reduce this risk.

Your patient’s age

A 12-step meeting dominated by people with gray, blue, or no hair can quickly put off teens and young adults in early recovery. Though these meetings with older members are likely to include persons who have achieved long-term and healthy recovery (making such meetings ideal territory for finding a sponsor), finding peers of a similar age is also important.

 

 

Meetings intended for young people are identified in 12-step meeting directories, but many of these “young peoples’ ” meetings have a preponderance of members older than 30—quite ancient by a 16-year-old’s standards. Conversely, some generic 12-step meetings might have a cadre of teenagers that attend regularly—at least for a while.

In AA and NA, teens and young adults tend to travel in nomadic packs, linger for a few months, then move on. For this reason, having contacts familiar with the characteristics of local meetings can be invaluable as you try to match a younger patient with a 12-step meeting.

Attitude toward spirituality

One of patients’ most common complaints about 12-step meetings is their surprise at how “religious” the programs are. Insiders are quick to point out that 12-step programs are “spiritual” and not “religious,” but the distinction is moot to patients who are uneasy with this aspect of meetings. The talk about “God as I understand Him,” the opening and closing of meetings with prayers, and the generous adoption of Judeo-Christian practices can rub agnostic, atheistic, and otherwise spiritually indifferent patients the wrong way.

To protect your patients from being blind-sided, review with them some of the spiritual practices employed in 12-step programs before they attend their first meeting:

  • Meetings begin with reading the Twelve Steps (Box 3) and other 12-step literature; all readings are peppered with spiritually-loaded words such as “God,” “Higher Power,” “prayer,” and “meditation.”
  • Meetings end with a prayer in which the group stands and holds hands (in AA) or links their arms in a huddle (NA). [I advise patients who might find this activity intolerable to duck out to the rest room 5 minutes before the meeting ends.]
  • Group leaders typically collect donations by passing the basket.

Certain meetings have a particularly heavy spiritual focus and might be appropriately prescribed for patients hungering for spiritual growth. But for patients who have had toxic encounters with religion or otherwise are ill-at-ease with spirituality or religious matters, starting out at one of the more spiritually hardcore 12-step meetings could be overwhelming. While your 12-step contact person is your best guide in these matters, the following points also apply:

  • Meetings listed as “11th Step” or “God as I understand Him” meetings will have a strong spiritual focus.
  • Meetings held on Sunday mornings often have the express purpose of focusing on spirituality.
  • “Step” meetings generally have a more spiritual focus, as 11 of the 12 steps are aimed at eliciting a “spiritual awakening.”
  • “Speaker” or “topic discussion” meetings tend to have a less spiritual focus, though this will vary with the meeting chairperson’s preferences.
  • “Beginners” meetings, when available, are intended for new members and devote more time to helping the newcomer understand the 12-step approach to spirituality.

Box 2

TOOLS FOR MAKING 12-STEP MEETING REFERRALS

Unless you regularly attend 12-step meetings, it is impossible to know which groups would be the best match for your patients. Here are suggestions for matching your patient’s needs with local 12-step meetings:

  • Use fellowship directories. All 12-step fellowships maintain directories of where and when meetings are held and whether meetings are nonsmoking or have other restrictions (e.g., gay-only, women-only). For directories, call local AA and NA fellowships (in the phone book’s white pages).
  • Develop a 12-step contact list. Rehabilitation centers often have counselors on staff who are familiar with local 12-step meetings and can recommend those that match your patients’ characteristics. Counselors who are active AA or NA members can be a valuable resource in identifying subtle differences in meetings.
  • Locate 12-step meetings for impaired professionals. Special 12-step meetings for nurses, physicians, and pharmacists are held in many cities. For technical reasons, these are not “official”12-step meetings and are not listed in 12-step directories. Times and locations can generally be obtained from local medical societies, impaired-professional programs, or treatment centers.

Box 3

THE 12 STEPS OF ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS

  1. We admitted we were powerless over alcohol—that our lives had become unmanageable.
  2. Cameto believe that a Power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity.
  3. Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood Him.
  4. Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves.
  5. Admitted to God, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs.
  6. Were entirely ready to have God remove all these defects of character.
  7. Humbly asked Him to remove our shortcomings.
  8. Made a list of all persons we had harmed, and became willing to make amends to them all.
  9. Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would injure them or others.
  10. Continued to take personal inventory and when we were wrong promptly admitted it.
  11. Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with God as we understood Him, praying only for knowledge of His will for us and the power to carry that out.
  12. Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps, we tried to carry this message to alcoholics and to practice these principles in all our affairs.

Source: Alcoholics Anonymous

 

 

AA’s main text, the so-called “Big Book” (its real title is: Alcoholics Anonymous7) has a chapter titled, “We Agnostics.” AA has many long-time members who have found support in the fellowship but never “found God” or a belief in a higher power other than the fellowship itself. These secular 12-step members demonstrate one of the many ironies of AA and NA—that spiritual fellowships can work even for individuals who reject spirituality.

Patients who resist spirituality are advised to “take what you can use” from the fellowship and “leave the rest.” While 12-step members will propose that the newcomer keep an open mind about spirituality, patients should also be assured that a seat is always waiting for them, regardless.

Whether your patient smokes

Most 12-step meetings today are smoke-free, not because of enlightenment within the fellowships but because meetings are usually held in churches, synagogues, and health care facilities where smoking is banned. The perception that attending 12-step meetings can be harmful to your health is out-of-date. Nonetheless, because most meetings have banned smoking, the few in which smoking is allowed are thick with smoke.

In general, 12-step clubhouses are among the holdouts where smoking is allowed during and after meetings. A clubhouse is typically a storefront rented or acquired by AA/NA members where meetings are held around the clock. Given the evidence that quitting smoking may improve overall health,10,11 patients should be encouraged to begin their involvement in smoke-free fellowships, which are identified in 12-step directories.

Your patient’s drug of choice

As its name implies, AA is intended for persons who desire to stop drinking. In practice, however, much of AA’s membership is addicted to more than one substance, and—in some cases—the drug of choice might not be alcohol.

Narcotics Anonymous—contrary to what its name implies—is for individuals addicted to any drug, not just narcotics. Patients generally should be advised to join the fellowship (AA or NA) that best matches their substance use history. There is, however, at least one exception that might best be illustrated with an example:

After I recommended NA meetings to a middle-class nurse addicted to analgesics, she returned for her next appointment quite angry. She attended three different NA meetings, and “all of the members were either heroin or crack cocaine addicts.” It seemed to her that all of them were on probation or parole. She was very uncomfortable throughout the meetings and upset with my recommendation.

In matching patients with meetings, socioeconomic and cultural factors take precedence over biochemistry. At the neuronal level, a nurse addicted to analgesics has a lot in common with a heroin addict, but her ability to relate to another recovering person—particularly in early recovery—may be limited. Arguing with my patient or countering that other nurses were probably at the meetings she attended would not have eased her reluctance to return to NA or helped our therapeutic alliance.

NA meetings are generally attended by individuals addicted to illicit drugs: amphetamines, crack cocaine, cannabis, and heroin. In larger cities, other 12-step fellowships may focus on specific drugs, such as cocaine, but these are rare. Just as individuals addicted to prescription narcotics are a minority in the treatment population, they are also a minority in NA.

For this reason, our prior recommendation—to match patients to meetings based on socioeconomic status—applies. It’s good policy to recommend that patients addicted to prescription medications try both AA and NA meetings and decide where they feel most comfortable.

The third tradition of AA states, “the only requirement for AA membership is a desire to stop drinking.” Though a purist might suggest that our analgesics-dependent nurse should join NA, her need to connect culturally with similar persons in recovery argues strongly for her to blend in at open AA meetings. A social drinker who never fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for alcohol dependence, she will have a better chance of abstaining from analgesics if she abstains from alcohol as well. For this reason, she should qualify for AA membership because she does, in fact, have “a desire to stop drinking.”

Some professionals addicted to prescription drugs will feel at home in NA meetings, whereas others will react as my patient did. Having access to a 12-step contact person who knows about the demographics of local NA meetings can help you make the best patient/meeting match.

Related resources

References

1. The Church of God Anonymous (religion of the 12-step movement) http://www.churchofgodanonymous.org/index2.html

2. White W. Slaying the Dragon Bloomington, IL: Chestnut Health Systems, 1998.

3. Crits-Christoph P, Siqueland L, Blaine J, et al. Psychosocial treatments for cocaine dependence: National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999;57(6):493-502.

4. Project Match. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. J Studies Alcohol 1997;58(1):7-29.

5. Ouimette PC, Finney JW, Moos RH. Twelve-step and cognitive-behavioral treatment for substance abuse: A comparison of treatment effectiveness. J Consult Clin Psychology 1997;65:230-40.

6. Morgenstern J, Blanchard KA, Morgan TJ, Labouvie E, Hayaki J. Testing the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral treatment for substance abuse in a community setting: Within treatment and post-treatment findings. J Consult Clin Psychology 2001;69:1007-17.

7. Alcoholics Anonymous (3rd ed). New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Service, 1976.

8. Emrick CD, Tonigan SJ, Montgomery H, Little L. Alcoholics Anonymous: what is currently known. In: McCrady BS, Miller WR (eds). Research on Alcoholics Anonymous New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center on Alcohol Studies Publications, 1993:45.

9. Blume S. Addiction in women. In: Galanter M, Kleber HD (eds). Textbook of substance abuse treatment (2nd ed). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1999;485-91.

10. Jarvis TJ. Implications of gender for alcohol treatment research: a quantitative and qualitative review. Br J Addiction 1992;87:1249-61.

11. Bobo JK, McIlvain HE, Lando HA, Walker RD, Leed-Kelly A. Effect of smoking cessation counseling on recovery from alcoholism: findings from a randomized community intervention trial. Addiction 1998;93:877-87.

12. Burling TA, Marshall GD, Seidner AL. Smoking cessation for substance abuse inpatients. J Subs Abuse 1991;3(3):269-76.

References

1. The Church of God Anonymous (religion of the 12-step movement) http://www.churchofgodanonymous.org/index2.html

2. White W. Slaying the Dragon Bloomington, IL: Chestnut Health Systems, 1998.

3. Crits-Christoph P, Siqueland L, Blaine J, et al. Psychosocial treatments for cocaine dependence: National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999;57(6):493-502.

4. Project Match. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. J Studies Alcohol 1997;58(1):7-29.

5. Ouimette PC, Finney JW, Moos RH. Twelve-step and cognitive-behavioral treatment for substance abuse: A comparison of treatment effectiveness. J Consult Clin Psychology 1997;65:230-40.

6. Morgenstern J, Blanchard KA, Morgan TJ, Labouvie E, Hayaki J. Testing the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral treatment for substance abuse in a community setting: Within treatment and post-treatment findings. J Consult Clin Psychology 2001;69:1007-17.

7. Alcoholics Anonymous (3rd ed). New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Service, 1976.

8. Emrick CD, Tonigan SJ, Montgomery H, Little L. Alcoholics Anonymous: what is currently known. In: McCrady BS, Miller WR (eds). Research on Alcoholics Anonymous New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center on Alcohol Studies Publications, 1993:45.

9. Blume S. Addiction in women. In: Galanter M, Kleber HD (eds). Textbook of substance abuse treatment (2nd ed). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1999;485-91.

10. Jarvis TJ. Implications of gender for alcohol treatment research: a quantitative and qualitative review. Br J Addiction 1992;87:1249-61.

11. Bobo JK, McIlvain HE, Lando HA, Walker RD, Leed-Kelly A. Effect of smoking cessation counseling on recovery from alcoholism: findings from a randomized community intervention trial. Addiction 1998;93:877-87.

12. Burling TA, Marshall GD, Seidner AL. Smoking cessation for substance abuse inpatients. J Subs Abuse 1991;3(3):269-76.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 01(10)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 01(10)
Page Number
16-24
Page Number
16-24
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
One AA meeting doesn’t fit all: 6 keys to prescribing 12-step programs
Display Headline
One AA meeting doesn’t fit all: 6 keys to prescribing 12-step programs
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Substance abuse: 12 principles to more effective outpatient treatment

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/11/2018 - 15:13
Display Headline
Substance abuse: 12 principles to more effective outpatient treatment

Outpatient treatment of substance abuse is changing as research and experience teach us more about the nature of addictive illness and the principles of recovery. The recommended approach now emphasizes ease of access, chronic rather than acute treatment, and collaboration rather than confrontation.

As psychiatrists, we should be familiar with these changes, so that we can offer our addicted patients effective treatment and referrals. In particular, those of us who lead multidisciplinary teams in mental health clinics and outpatient programs need strategies that will help us make sound clinical decisions on detoxification, medical or psychiatric stabilization, and rehabilitation goals.

A new protocol that addresses these needs is being developed by a consensus panel of the Center for Substance Abuse and Treatment (Box 1).1,2 Two of us (RFF, RR) are members of that panel, and we all are recognized experts in the outpatient treatment of addicted individuals, with combined experience of more than 70 years. Based on available evidence and expert opinion, we offer you 12 principles of outpatient substance dependence treatment that can help you achieve the most favorable results (Table 1).

Box 1

OUTPATIENT TREATMENT IS GROWING AND CHANGING

Many Americans are seeking outpatient treatment for substance dependence, according to recent federal surveys. In 1999, at least 1 million people were admitted to state-funded outpatient substance abuse treatment programs,1 and an additional unknown number sought treatment from psychiatrists in private practice. Outpatient treatment, including intensive outpatient care, is the most common form of treatment and is offered at 82% of all addiction treatment facilities.2

A federally-sponsored national consensus panel on intensive outpatient treatment of substance abuse is revising the existing Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) on Intensive Outpatient Treatment. Dr. Forman is the chair and Dr. Rawson is a member of the consensus panel. The draft TIP is under review and planned for release in 2003 by the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, a center of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Principle 1: Open the doors wider

Outpatient clinics were once considered inappropriate for addicted individuals with significant psychosocial problems (such as homelessness) or co-occurring psychiatric disorders. Successful outpatient treatment was thought possible only for high-functioning, employed addicts who were free of significant psychiatric comorbidity.

Today, it is accepted that outpatients with a wide range of biopsychosocial problems can be effectively treated IF they receive case management and housing support and their co-occurring medical and psychiatric conditions are stabilized.

Efforts to ease the addicted patient into treatment should begin the moment a potential patient or family member seeks help. The pleasure that substance abusers derive from drug use makes them typically ambivalent about stopping their compulsive behaviors, and delays or obstacles to admission lead to “no shows” and drop-outs.3 Admissions increase when patients are given appointments the day they call for help.

From the initial outpatient encounter, the patient should feel like a welcomed participant who is responsible for his or her recovery. Access to outpatient programs increases when:

  • child-care assistance is provided as needed;
  • hours of operation are designed for the patient’s (rather than the staff’s) convenience;
  • transportation assistance is provided, particularly for adolescents;
  • the treatment plan is flexible and individualized to meet each patient’s specific needs.

Principle 2: Do a comprehensive initial evaluation

The open-door approach is most successful when the psychiatrist performs a comprehensive initial psychiatric and medical evaluation and works closely with a specialized treatment team. The initial medical and psychiatric evaluation is beyond the scope of this article and has been previously reviewed.4 Determining the need for medical detoxification is a priority during this phase of treatment.

Drug use patterns The treating physician should maintain a high index of suspicion for conditions associated with drug use. Cocaine causes seizures and cardiac arrhythmias, as well as vasoconstriction that leads to tissue necrosis (i.e., myocardial infarction, stroke, spontaneous abortion, and renal failure). Alcohol abuse affects brain, liver, cardiac, and endocrine tissue. Heroin produces acute overdose through respiratory depression, and its IV route of administration increases the risk of AIDS, viral hepatitis, pneumonia, sepsis, and endocarditis.

Function Structured interviews such as the Addiction Severity Index (ASI)5 can be used to assess functional impairment. Because addicted patients may be reluctant to disclose sensitive personal information, it is important to collect collateral information from family and friends, laboratory tests, and medical records.

Psychiatric concerns Many psychiatric syndromes are caused by substance abuse. Cocaine intoxication is often associated with psychosis (paranoia, auditory and tactile hallucinations), panic anxiety, and aggressiveness, whereas cocaine withdrawal produces depressed mood. Depression is also highly associated with chronic alcohol and opiate dependence. Withdrawal from opioids, alcohol, and sedatives produces anxiety.

 

 

Patients with bipolar disorder, major depression, panic anxiety, and schizophrenia who present with co-occurring addiction require coordinated and simultaneous stabilization of their addictive and psychiatric disorders.

Table 1

12 PRINCIPLES OF EFFECTIVE OUTPATIENT ADDICTION TREATMENT

  1. Open the doors wider
  2. Do a comprehensive initial evaluation
  3. Build on existing motivation
  4. Forge a therapeutic alliance
  5. Make retention a priority
  6. Provide ongoing care
  7. Match services with treatment needs
  8. Monitor abstinence
  9. Use 12-step and other community supports
  10. Manage medications
  11. Educate about addiction and recovery
  12. Involve families in treatment

Principle 3: Build on existing motivation

That an addicted patient must “hit bottom” before successful treatment may begin is a common misconception. In truth, studies find similar outcomes in individuals who enter treatment voluntarily and those who are externally pressured or legally coerced.6 Regardless of patients’ motivation when they enter treatment, they are likely to alternate over time between being more and less motivated. For this reason, it is necessary to remind them why they sought treatment and to use existing external pressures.

For example, with the patient’s consent it would be valuable to maintain contact with a parole officer who mandated a patient’s substance-abuse treatment. Likewise, patients entering treatment under threat of divorce should be asked to consent to family contact and should receive family therapy. Families often provide useful clinical information and can exert powerful influence when the patient’s motivation wanes. A patient’s refusal to allow contact with family (or other important sources of collateral information) often represents resistance that should be explored clinically and addressed.

With open dialogue, resistance to treatment can be reduced with education, peer groups, and family therapy. Motivational enhancement and interviewing work described by Miller, Procaska, and DiClemente7,8 is designed to reduce treatment resistance in a respectful and clinically effective manner while avoiding confrontation that might provoke dropout and relapse.

Principle 4: Forge a therapeutic alliance

A therapeutic alliance produces positive outcomes in substance-dependent outpatients.9-11 A recent National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) therapy manual notes that a therapeutic alliance exists when the patient perceives that:

  • the clinician accepts and respects him or her;
  • the patient’s problems can be overcome by working together with the clinician;
  • the clinician understands what the patient is hoping to get out of treatment.12

Clinicians can help forge this therapeutic alliance by being active listeners, by being empathic and nonjudgmental, and by approaching treatment as an active collaboration.12

Principle 5: Make retention a priority

It is simple but true: you cannot treat a patient who has dropped out.

Treatment retention is associated with better outcomes13,14 and is a key indicator of the performance of an outpatient treatment program. High drop-out rates are demoralizing to patients who remain in treatment and to the clinicians who must document so-called “3-day treatments.” Because admission and initial evaluation of patients is labor-intensive, premature attrition is costly and time-consuming. Strategies to increase retention are listed in Table 2.

Table 2

STRATEGIES TO RETAIN PATIENTS IN TREATMENT

  • Preadmission telephone screening interviews
  • Telephone and mailed reminders
  • Telephone orientations
  • Providing timely appointments

Clinicians can improve retention by tolerating different rates of change and levels of motivation. Individuals adopt new behaviors at different rates. You might become frustrated when patients do not immediately “buy” a particular version of recovery. Patients, however, often drop out when they feel they are being “force-fed” recommendations for sacrifice and major lifestyle changes that make no sense to them (at least not at the moment).

Principle 6: Provide ongoing care

Addiction is a complex biopsychosocial problem that requires long-term treatment. Even after extended abstinence, substance abusers experience craving and are vulnerable to relapse.

Addicts often enter outpatient treatment with psychosocial, medical, and psychiatric problems. Transformation from active addiction to full functioning in society requires sustained and conscientious effort by the patient, support system, and treatment team. Like asthma, diabetes, and other chronic diseases, addiction requires ongoing care.15

Unlike other chronic conditions, however, addiction is pleasure-reinforced, and addicted individuals are particularly at risk for relapse. Ongoing care may interrupt a relapse or at least interrupt it sooner than if no ongoing treatment were provided.

Substance dependence treatment for less than 90 days is of little or no use, and treatment lasting significantly longer often is indicated, according to the NIDA.16 When patients complete an intensive treatment phase, they should be evaluated for readiness to transfer to less-intensive care, with gradual transition from several therapeutic contacts per week, to weekly contact, to semimonthly contact, and so on. The concept of “graduation” should clearly convey not an ending but a “commencement” or beginning, as it does in college.

Unfortunately, the long-term approach to substance dependence is undermined by managed care organizations’ insistence on brief treatments. Also, regulations that view addiction as an acute episode may require that patient charts be closed at the end of intensive treatment. Such failures to appreciate the chronic nature of addiction undermine access to treatment and service delivery and contribute to recidivism and medical, social, criminal, and economic consequences associated with active addiction.

 

 

Principle 7: Match services with treatment needs

Outcomes improve when treatment services meet individual needs.17 Medical, psychiatric, psychosocial, legal, and housing problems can distract patients from the work of therapy. It is important to match each patient’s problems and needs with appropriate treatment settings, interventions, and services, according to the NIDA’s Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment.16 Creating flexible, responsive programs means more work for the treatment team, but it enhances the quality of care.

Treating concomitant psychiatric illness often requires innovations in outpatient treatment programs. For example, psychiatrists must avoid undermining treatment by inappropriately prescribing addictive agents such as benzodiazepines. At the same time, drug counselors may benefit from education about the potential benefits of medications in treating co-occuring disorders and craving. Coordinated delivery of psychiatric and rehabilitative treatment requires open communication in regularly scheduled multidisciplinary team meetings.

Principle 8: Monitor abstinence

Routine urine drug screens, Breathalyzer tests—administered at least weekly— and/or other laboratory tests to confirm self-reported abstinence can improve treatment outcomes. Regular drug and alcohol monitoring provides an objective indicator of progress, serves as a deterrent, and can help motivate the patient to withstand drug urges.

Individuals attempting abstinence from one substance have better outcomes if they abstain from all addictive substances18 (although tobacco use is controversial and requires further research). Even so, patients often continue to use addictive substances during treatment. Patients struggling with abstinence should not be discharged from treatment programs for manifesting the symptoms for which they are seeking treatment.

Substance-dependent individuals progress at different rates during treatment, and creative strategies to enhance motivation and retention can ultimately produce positive results. Outpatient clinics should consider different treatment tracks for patients at different stages of readiness for recovery.

Box 2

ADDICTION RESOURCES ON THE WEB

Principle 9: Use 12-step and other community supports

Patients who participate in 12-step programs and treatments have better outcomes than those who do not.19-21 Still, patients in early recovery may find it difficult to join community-based support groups, such as Alcoholics Anonymous (AA). Patients are often ambivalent about—or strongly opposed to—joining AA because of embarrassment, negative experiences, or inadequate preparation for joining a 12-step fellowship. Substance abusers who are ambivalent about recovery often dispute 12-step directives on total abstinence, sweeping lifestyle changes, and the need to “give up control” over treatment recommendations. Common issues in early recovery include:

  • how to select a 12-step home group and a sponsor;
  • how to overcome uneasiness associated with being in a 12-step group;
  • how to address any discomfort the patient may feel with the religious nature of 12-step meetings.22

Patients’ resistance to 12-step treatment should be explored and addressed. Sometimes all they need is encouragement and help in finding a sponsor. Those with more difficult concerns may need a different approach. For example, social phobia is common in alcoholics and can be exacerbated by 12-step meetings; symptoms often respond to beta-adrenergic blockade. Patients with schizophrenia and those with paranoid features often do poorly in 12-step treatment if their paranoid symptoms cannot be successfully managed.

Principle 10: Manage medications

To avoid drug interactions, all prescribers involved with the patient’s care should coordinate their medication management efforts. Many substance abusers suffer from co-occurring psychiatric conditions23 for which psychiatric medications are standard treatment.24,25 In addition, medical detoxification is often necessary for heroin, alcohol, and sedative/hypnotic-dependent individuals. These treatments, which are beyond the scope of this article, are best integrated with drug rehabilitation.

Various medications for addiction have been reported to improve outcome:

  • Agonist treatment with methadone, a long-acting opioid, can reduce heroin use, crime, and the risk of illnesses such as AIDS and viral hepatitis that are associated with IV drug use.
  • Buprenorphine, a partial opioid receptor agonist with similar benefits, may soon be approved for the treatment of opiate dependence in outpatient settings.26
  • Naltrexone, an opioid receptor antagonist, has long been proposed as a treatment for opiate dependence and has been shown to be effective in alcoholism.27

No effective pharmacologic treatment is available for cocaine dependence, although this is the focus of extensive government-sponsored research.

Principle 11: Educate about addiction and recovery

A wealth of accurate, free information about addiction and recovery is available through Web sites (Box 2) and other sources.

 

 

Ideally, outpatients in early recovery should be oriented in how to refuse offers of addictive substances, stress management, relapse prevention, information about the biology of addiction, 12-step fellowship integration, and appropriate use of medications.

Principle 12: Involve families in treatment

Treatment outcomes improve when addicts’ families are involved in the recovery process.28,29 Some family members enable addictive behavior by purchasing drugs for their relatives or providing money for this purpose, while other families are knowledgeable about treatment and can be a vital force supporting the recovery process

Treatment can help modify unhealthy behavior patterns that some families develop to compensate for a substance abuser’s actions. Because substance use disorders often run in families, try to assess not only the identified patient but also others in the patient’s life.

Related resources

  • Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (http://www.health.org/)
  • Miller WR. Enhancing motivation for change in substance abuse treatment. CSAT treatment improvement protocol #35. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1999.
  • Rawson R. Treatment for stimulant use disorders. CSAT treatment improvement protocol #33. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1999.
  • Mercer DE, Woody GE. An individual drug counseling approach to treat cocaine addiction: The Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study model. NIDA manual #3. Therapy manuals for drug addiction. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1999.

Disclosure

The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article.

References

1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. Treatment episode data set (TEDS): 1994-1999. National admissions to substance abuse treatment services. DASIS series: S-14. DHHS publication no. (SMA) 01-3550. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, 2001.

2. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. 1999 uniform facility data set. DASIS series: S-12. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, 2001.

3. Festinger DS, Lamb RJ, Kirby KC, Marlowe DB. The accelerated intake: a method for increasing initial attendance to outpatient cocaine treatment. J Applied Behav Analysis 1996;29(3):387-9.

4. Dackis CA, Gold MS. Psychiatric hospitals for treatment of dual diagnosis. In: Lowinson JH, ed. Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1992;467-85.

5. McLellan AT, Luborsky L, et al. An improved diagnostic instrument for substance abuse patients, The Addiction Severity Index. J Nervous Mental Dis 1980;168:26-33.

6. Marlowe DB, Kirby KC, et al. Assessment of coercive and noncoercive pressures to enter drug abuse treatment. Drug & Alcohol Dependence 1996;42(2):77-84.

7. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. The transtheoretical approach: crossing traditional boundaries of therapy. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones, Irwin, 1984.

8. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press, 1991.

9. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Beyond the therapeutic alliance: keeping the drug-dependent individual in treatment. Research monograph 165, NTIS 97-181606, Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health, 1997.

10. Connors GJ, DiClemente CC, Dermen KH, et al. Predicting the therapeutic alliance in alcoholism treatment. J Studies Alcohol 2000;61(1):139-49.

11. Barber JP, Luborsky L, Gallop R, et al. Therapeutic alliance as a predictor of outcome and retention in the National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study. J Consult Clin Psychol 2001;69(1):119-24.

12. Mercer D, Woody G. Individual drug counseling. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) manual #3: Therapy manuals for drug addiction. (NIH pub. no. 99-4380). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, 1999.

13. McKay JR, Alterman AI, McLellan AT, Snider EC. Treatment goals, continuity of care, and outcome in a day hospital substance abuse rehabilitation program. Am J Psychiatry 1994;151(2):254-9.

14. Simpson DD, Brown BS. Treatment retention and follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychol Addictive Behaviors 1998;11(4):294-307.

15. McLellan T, Kleber H, O’Brien C. Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: implications for treatment, insurance and outcomes evaluation. JAMA 2000;284:1689-95.

16. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Principles of drug addiction treatment: a research-based guide (NIH publication no. 00-4180). Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health, 1999.

17. McLellan AT, Hagan TA, Levine M, et al. Supplemental social services improve outcomes in public addiction treatment. Addiction 1998;93:1489-99.

18. Hughes JR. Treatment of smoking cessation in smokers with past alcohol/drug problems. J Substance Abuse Treatment 1993;10:181-7.

19. DuPont RL, Shiraki S. Recent research in twelve step programs. In: Miller NS, ed. Principles of Addiction Medicine Chevy Chase, MD: American Society of Addiction Medicine, 1994.

20. Crits-Christoph P, Siqueland L, Blaine J, et al. Psychosocial treatments for cocaine dependence: National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999;57(6):493-502.

21. McCrady BS, Miller WR (eds) Research on Alcoholics Anonymous New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies, 1993.

22. Nowinski J, Baker S, Carroll KM. Twelve-Step facilitation therapy manual: A clinical research guide for therapists treating individuals with alcohol abuse and dependence. NIAAA Project MATCH Monograph Series, vol. 1. DHHS Pub. No. (ADM)92-1893. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 1992.

23. Regier DA, Farmer ME, Rae DS, et al. Comorbidity of mental disorders with alcohol and other drug abuse: results from the epidemiologic catchment area (ECA) study. JAMA 1990;264(19):2511-18.

24. Carroll KM. Integrating psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy in substance abuse treatment. In: Rotgers F, Keller DS, Morgenstern J, eds. Treating substance abuse: theory and technique. New York: Guilford Press, 1996.

25. Carroll KM, Nich C, Ball SA, et al. Treatment of cocaine and alcohol dependence with psychotherapy and disulfiram. Addiction (in press).

26. Ling W, Wesson DR, Charuvastra C, Klett CJ. A controlled trial comparing buprenorphine and methadone maintenance in opioid dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996;53:401-7.

27. Volpicelli JR, Alterman AI, Hayashida M, O’Brien CP. Naltrexone in the treatment of alcohol dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992;49:876-80.

28. McCrady BS, Noel NE, Abrams DB, et al. Comparative effectiveness of three types of spouse involvement in outpatient behavioral alcoholism treatment. J Studies Alcohol 1986;47:459-67.

29. Szapocznik J, Williams RA. Brief strategic family therapy: twenty-five years of interplay among theory, research and practice in adolescent behavior problems and drug abuse. Clin Child Family Psychol Rev 2000;3(2):117-34.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Robert F. Forman, PhD
Assistant professor of psychiatry Treatment Research Institute University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

Charles Dackis, MD
Assistant professor of psychiatry Chief of Psychiatry, Presbyterian Medical Center University of Pennsylvania Health Systems, Philadelphia

Rick Rawson, PhD
Matrix Center and Institute Deputy director, UCLA Addiction Medicine Services University of California, Los Angeles

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 01(06)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
16-24
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Robert F. Forman, PhD
Assistant professor of psychiatry Treatment Research Institute University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

Charles Dackis, MD
Assistant professor of psychiatry Chief of Psychiatry, Presbyterian Medical Center University of Pennsylvania Health Systems, Philadelphia

Rick Rawson, PhD
Matrix Center and Institute Deputy director, UCLA Addiction Medicine Services University of California, Los Angeles

Author and Disclosure Information

Robert F. Forman, PhD
Assistant professor of psychiatry Treatment Research Institute University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

Charles Dackis, MD
Assistant professor of psychiatry Chief of Psychiatry, Presbyterian Medical Center University of Pennsylvania Health Systems, Philadelphia

Rick Rawson, PhD
Matrix Center and Institute Deputy director, UCLA Addiction Medicine Services University of California, Los Angeles

Article PDF
Article PDF

Outpatient treatment of substance abuse is changing as research and experience teach us more about the nature of addictive illness and the principles of recovery. The recommended approach now emphasizes ease of access, chronic rather than acute treatment, and collaboration rather than confrontation.

As psychiatrists, we should be familiar with these changes, so that we can offer our addicted patients effective treatment and referrals. In particular, those of us who lead multidisciplinary teams in mental health clinics and outpatient programs need strategies that will help us make sound clinical decisions on detoxification, medical or psychiatric stabilization, and rehabilitation goals.

A new protocol that addresses these needs is being developed by a consensus panel of the Center for Substance Abuse and Treatment (Box 1).1,2 Two of us (RFF, RR) are members of that panel, and we all are recognized experts in the outpatient treatment of addicted individuals, with combined experience of more than 70 years. Based on available evidence and expert opinion, we offer you 12 principles of outpatient substance dependence treatment that can help you achieve the most favorable results (Table 1).

Box 1

OUTPATIENT TREATMENT IS GROWING AND CHANGING

Many Americans are seeking outpatient treatment for substance dependence, according to recent federal surveys. In 1999, at least 1 million people were admitted to state-funded outpatient substance abuse treatment programs,1 and an additional unknown number sought treatment from psychiatrists in private practice. Outpatient treatment, including intensive outpatient care, is the most common form of treatment and is offered at 82% of all addiction treatment facilities.2

A federally-sponsored national consensus panel on intensive outpatient treatment of substance abuse is revising the existing Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) on Intensive Outpatient Treatment. Dr. Forman is the chair and Dr. Rawson is a member of the consensus panel. The draft TIP is under review and planned for release in 2003 by the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, a center of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Principle 1: Open the doors wider

Outpatient clinics were once considered inappropriate for addicted individuals with significant psychosocial problems (such as homelessness) or co-occurring psychiatric disorders. Successful outpatient treatment was thought possible only for high-functioning, employed addicts who were free of significant psychiatric comorbidity.

Today, it is accepted that outpatients with a wide range of biopsychosocial problems can be effectively treated IF they receive case management and housing support and their co-occurring medical and psychiatric conditions are stabilized.

Efforts to ease the addicted patient into treatment should begin the moment a potential patient or family member seeks help. The pleasure that substance abusers derive from drug use makes them typically ambivalent about stopping their compulsive behaviors, and delays or obstacles to admission lead to “no shows” and drop-outs.3 Admissions increase when patients are given appointments the day they call for help.

From the initial outpatient encounter, the patient should feel like a welcomed participant who is responsible for his or her recovery. Access to outpatient programs increases when:

  • child-care assistance is provided as needed;
  • hours of operation are designed for the patient’s (rather than the staff’s) convenience;
  • transportation assistance is provided, particularly for adolescents;
  • the treatment plan is flexible and individualized to meet each patient’s specific needs.

Principle 2: Do a comprehensive initial evaluation

The open-door approach is most successful when the psychiatrist performs a comprehensive initial psychiatric and medical evaluation and works closely with a specialized treatment team. The initial medical and psychiatric evaluation is beyond the scope of this article and has been previously reviewed.4 Determining the need for medical detoxification is a priority during this phase of treatment.

Drug use patterns The treating physician should maintain a high index of suspicion for conditions associated with drug use. Cocaine causes seizures and cardiac arrhythmias, as well as vasoconstriction that leads to tissue necrosis (i.e., myocardial infarction, stroke, spontaneous abortion, and renal failure). Alcohol abuse affects brain, liver, cardiac, and endocrine tissue. Heroin produces acute overdose through respiratory depression, and its IV route of administration increases the risk of AIDS, viral hepatitis, pneumonia, sepsis, and endocarditis.

Function Structured interviews such as the Addiction Severity Index (ASI)5 can be used to assess functional impairment. Because addicted patients may be reluctant to disclose sensitive personal information, it is important to collect collateral information from family and friends, laboratory tests, and medical records.

Psychiatric concerns Many psychiatric syndromes are caused by substance abuse. Cocaine intoxication is often associated with psychosis (paranoia, auditory and tactile hallucinations), panic anxiety, and aggressiveness, whereas cocaine withdrawal produces depressed mood. Depression is also highly associated with chronic alcohol and opiate dependence. Withdrawal from opioids, alcohol, and sedatives produces anxiety.

 

 

Patients with bipolar disorder, major depression, panic anxiety, and schizophrenia who present with co-occurring addiction require coordinated and simultaneous stabilization of their addictive and psychiatric disorders.

Table 1

12 PRINCIPLES OF EFFECTIVE OUTPATIENT ADDICTION TREATMENT

  1. Open the doors wider
  2. Do a comprehensive initial evaluation
  3. Build on existing motivation
  4. Forge a therapeutic alliance
  5. Make retention a priority
  6. Provide ongoing care
  7. Match services with treatment needs
  8. Monitor abstinence
  9. Use 12-step and other community supports
  10. Manage medications
  11. Educate about addiction and recovery
  12. Involve families in treatment

Principle 3: Build on existing motivation

That an addicted patient must “hit bottom” before successful treatment may begin is a common misconception. In truth, studies find similar outcomes in individuals who enter treatment voluntarily and those who are externally pressured or legally coerced.6 Regardless of patients’ motivation when they enter treatment, they are likely to alternate over time between being more and less motivated. For this reason, it is necessary to remind them why they sought treatment and to use existing external pressures.

For example, with the patient’s consent it would be valuable to maintain contact with a parole officer who mandated a patient’s substance-abuse treatment. Likewise, patients entering treatment under threat of divorce should be asked to consent to family contact and should receive family therapy. Families often provide useful clinical information and can exert powerful influence when the patient’s motivation wanes. A patient’s refusal to allow contact with family (or other important sources of collateral information) often represents resistance that should be explored clinically and addressed.

With open dialogue, resistance to treatment can be reduced with education, peer groups, and family therapy. Motivational enhancement and interviewing work described by Miller, Procaska, and DiClemente7,8 is designed to reduce treatment resistance in a respectful and clinically effective manner while avoiding confrontation that might provoke dropout and relapse.

Principle 4: Forge a therapeutic alliance

A therapeutic alliance produces positive outcomes in substance-dependent outpatients.9-11 A recent National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) therapy manual notes that a therapeutic alliance exists when the patient perceives that:

  • the clinician accepts and respects him or her;
  • the patient’s problems can be overcome by working together with the clinician;
  • the clinician understands what the patient is hoping to get out of treatment.12

Clinicians can help forge this therapeutic alliance by being active listeners, by being empathic and nonjudgmental, and by approaching treatment as an active collaboration.12

Principle 5: Make retention a priority

It is simple but true: you cannot treat a patient who has dropped out.

Treatment retention is associated with better outcomes13,14 and is a key indicator of the performance of an outpatient treatment program. High drop-out rates are demoralizing to patients who remain in treatment and to the clinicians who must document so-called “3-day treatments.” Because admission and initial evaluation of patients is labor-intensive, premature attrition is costly and time-consuming. Strategies to increase retention are listed in Table 2.

Table 2

STRATEGIES TO RETAIN PATIENTS IN TREATMENT

  • Preadmission telephone screening interviews
  • Telephone and mailed reminders
  • Telephone orientations
  • Providing timely appointments

Clinicians can improve retention by tolerating different rates of change and levels of motivation. Individuals adopt new behaviors at different rates. You might become frustrated when patients do not immediately “buy” a particular version of recovery. Patients, however, often drop out when they feel they are being “force-fed” recommendations for sacrifice and major lifestyle changes that make no sense to them (at least not at the moment).

Principle 6: Provide ongoing care

Addiction is a complex biopsychosocial problem that requires long-term treatment. Even after extended abstinence, substance abusers experience craving and are vulnerable to relapse.

Addicts often enter outpatient treatment with psychosocial, medical, and psychiatric problems. Transformation from active addiction to full functioning in society requires sustained and conscientious effort by the patient, support system, and treatment team. Like asthma, diabetes, and other chronic diseases, addiction requires ongoing care.15

Unlike other chronic conditions, however, addiction is pleasure-reinforced, and addicted individuals are particularly at risk for relapse. Ongoing care may interrupt a relapse or at least interrupt it sooner than if no ongoing treatment were provided.

Substance dependence treatment for less than 90 days is of little or no use, and treatment lasting significantly longer often is indicated, according to the NIDA.16 When patients complete an intensive treatment phase, they should be evaluated for readiness to transfer to less-intensive care, with gradual transition from several therapeutic contacts per week, to weekly contact, to semimonthly contact, and so on. The concept of “graduation” should clearly convey not an ending but a “commencement” or beginning, as it does in college.

Unfortunately, the long-term approach to substance dependence is undermined by managed care organizations’ insistence on brief treatments. Also, regulations that view addiction as an acute episode may require that patient charts be closed at the end of intensive treatment. Such failures to appreciate the chronic nature of addiction undermine access to treatment and service delivery and contribute to recidivism and medical, social, criminal, and economic consequences associated with active addiction.

 

 

Principle 7: Match services with treatment needs

Outcomes improve when treatment services meet individual needs.17 Medical, psychiatric, psychosocial, legal, and housing problems can distract patients from the work of therapy. It is important to match each patient’s problems and needs with appropriate treatment settings, interventions, and services, according to the NIDA’s Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment.16 Creating flexible, responsive programs means more work for the treatment team, but it enhances the quality of care.

Treating concomitant psychiatric illness often requires innovations in outpatient treatment programs. For example, psychiatrists must avoid undermining treatment by inappropriately prescribing addictive agents such as benzodiazepines. At the same time, drug counselors may benefit from education about the potential benefits of medications in treating co-occuring disorders and craving. Coordinated delivery of psychiatric and rehabilitative treatment requires open communication in regularly scheduled multidisciplinary team meetings.

Principle 8: Monitor abstinence

Routine urine drug screens, Breathalyzer tests—administered at least weekly— and/or other laboratory tests to confirm self-reported abstinence can improve treatment outcomes. Regular drug and alcohol monitoring provides an objective indicator of progress, serves as a deterrent, and can help motivate the patient to withstand drug urges.

Individuals attempting abstinence from one substance have better outcomes if they abstain from all addictive substances18 (although tobacco use is controversial and requires further research). Even so, patients often continue to use addictive substances during treatment. Patients struggling with abstinence should not be discharged from treatment programs for manifesting the symptoms for which they are seeking treatment.

Substance-dependent individuals progress at different rates during treatment, and creative strategies to enhance motivation and retention can ultimately produce positive results. Outpatient clinics should consider different treatment tracks for patients at different stages of readiness for recovery.

Box 2

ADDICTION RESOURCES ON THE WEB

Principle 9: Use 12-step and other community supports

Patients who participate in 12-step programs and treatments have better outcomes than those who do not.19-21 Still, patients in early recovery may find it difficult to join community-based support groups, such as Alcoholics Anonymous (AA). Patients are often ambivalent about—or strongly opposed to—joining AA because of embarrassment, negative experiences, or inadequate preparation for joining a 12-step fellowship. Substance abusers who are ambivalent about recovery often dispute 12-step directives on total abstinence, sweeping lifestyle changes, and the need to “give up control” over treatment recommendations. Common issues in early recovery include:

  • how to select a 12-step home group and a sponsor;
  • how to overcome uneasiness associated with being in a 12-step group;
  • how to address any discomfort the patient may feel with the religious nature of 12-step meetings.22

Patients’ resistance to 12-step treatment should be explored and addressed. Sometimes all they need is encouragement and help in finding a sponsor. Those with more difficult concerns may need a different approach. For example, social phobia is common in alcoholics and can be exacerbated by 12-step meetings; symptoms often respond to beta-adrenergic blockade. Patients with schizophrenia and those with paranoid features often do poorly in 12-step treatment if their paranoid symptoms cannot be successfully managed.

Principle 10: Manage medications

To avoid drug interactions, all prescribers involved with the patient’s care should coordinate their medication management efforts. Many substance abusers suffer from co-occurring psychiatric conditions23 for which psychiatric medications are standard treatment.24,25 In addition, medical detoxification is often necessary for heroin, alcohol, and sedative/hypnotic-dependent individuals. These treatments, which are beyond the scope of this article, are best integrated with drug rehabilitation.

Various medications for addiction have been reported to improve outcome:

  • Agonist treatment with methadone, a long-acting opioid, can reduce heroin use, crime, and the risk of illnesses such as AIDS and viral hepatitis that are associated with IV drug use.
  • Buprenorphine, a partial opioid receptor agonist with similar benefits, may soon be approved for the treatment of opiate dependence in outpatient settings.26
  • Naltrexone, an opioid receptor antagonist, has long been proposed as a treatment for opiate dependence and has been shown to be effective in alcoholism.27

No effective pharmacologic treatment is available for cocaine dependence, although this is the focus of extensive government-sponsored research.

Principle 11: Educate about addiction and recovery

A wealth of accurate, free information about addiction and recovery is available through Web sites (Box 2) and other sources.

 

 

Ideally, outpatients in early recovery should be oriented in how to refuse offers of addictive substances, stress management, relapse prevention, information about the biology of addiction, 12-step fellowship integration, and appropriate use of medications.

Principle 12: Involve families in treatment

Treatment outcomes improve when addicts’ families are involved in the recovery process.28,29 Some family members enable addictive behavior by purchasing drugs for their relatives or providing money for this purpose, while other families are knowledgeable about treatment and can be a vital force supporting the recovery process

Treatment can help modify unhealthy behavior patterns that some families develop to compensate for a substance abuser’s actions. Because substance use disorders often run in families, try to assess not only the identified patient but also others in the patient’s life.

Related resources

  • Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (http://www.health.org/)
  • Miller WR. Enhancing motivation for change in substance abuse treatment. CSAT treatment improvement protocol #35. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1999.
  • Rawson R. Treatment for stimulant use disorders. CSAT treatment improvement protocol #33. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1999.
  • Mercer DE, Woody GE. An individual drug counseling approach to treat cocaine addiction: The Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study model. NIDA manual #3. Therapy manuals for drug addiction. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1999.

Disclosure

The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article.

Outpatient treatment of substance abuse is changing as research and experience teach us more about the nature of addictive illness and the principles of recovery. The recommended approach now emphasizes ease of access, chronic rather than acute treatment, and collaboration rather than confrontation.

As psychiatrists, we should be familiar with these changes, so that we can offer our addicted patients effective treatment and referrals. In particular, those of us who lead multidisciplinary teams in mental health clinics and outpatient programs need strategies that will help us make sound clinical decisions on detoxification, medical or psychiatric stabilization, and rehabilitation goals.

A new protocol that addresses these needs is being developed by a consensus panel of the Center for Substance Abuse and Treatment (Box 1).1,2 Two of us (RFF, RR) are members of that panel, and we all are recognized experts in the outpatient treatment of addicted individuals, with combined experience of more than 70 years. Based on available evidence and expert opinion, we offer you 12 principles of outpatient substance dependence treatment that can help you achieve the most favorable results (Table 1).

Box 1

OUTPATIENT TREATMENT IS GROWING AND CHANGING

Many Americans are seeking outpatient treatment for substance dependence, according to recent federal surveys. In 1999, at least 1 million people were admitted to state-funded outpatient substance abuse treatment programs,1 and an additional unknown number sought treatment from psychiatrists in private practice. Outpatient treatment, including intensive outpatient care, is the most common form of treatment and is offered at 82% of all addiction treatment facilities.2

A federally-sponsored national consensus panel on intensive outpatient treatment of substance abuse is revising the existing Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) on Intensive Outpatient Treatment. Dr. Forman is the chair and Dr. Rawson is a member of the consensus panel. The draft TIP is under review and planned for release in 2003 by the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, a center of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Principle 1: Open the doors wider

Outpatient clinics were once considered inappropriate for addicted individuals with significant psychosocial problems (such as homelessness) or co-occurring psychiatric disorders. Successful outpatient treatment was thought possible only for high-functioning, employed addicts who were free of significant psychiatric comorbidity.

Today, it is accepted that outpatients with a wide range of biopsychosocial problems can be effectively treated IF they receive case management and housing support and their co-occurring medical and psychiatric conditions are stabilized.

Efforts to ease the addicted patient into treatment should begin the moment a potential patient or family member seeks help. The pleasure that substance abusers derive from drug use makes them typically ambivalent about stopping their compulsive behaviors, and delays or obstacles to admission lead to “no shows” and drop-outs.3 Admissions increase when patients are given appointments the day they call for help.

From the initial outpatient encounter, the patient should feel like a welcomed participant who is responsible for his or her recovery. Access to outpatient programs increases when:

  • child-care assistance is provided as needed;
  • hours of operation are designed for the patient’s (rather than the staff’s) convenience;
  • transportation assistance is provided, particularly for adolescents;
  • the treatment plan is flexible and individualized to meet each patient’s specific needs.

Principle 2: Do a comprehensive initial evaluation

The open-door approach is most successful when the psychiatrist performs a comprehensive initial psychiatric and medical evaluation and works closely with a specialized treatment team. The initial medical and psychiatric evaluation is beyond the scope of this article and has been previously reviewed.4 Determining the need for medical detoxification is a priority during this phase of treatment.

Drug use patterns The treating physician should maintain a high index of suspicion for conditions associated with drug use. Cocaine causes seizures and cardiac arrhythmias, as well as vasoconstriction that leads to tissue necrosis (i.e., myocardial infarction, stroke, spontaneous abortion, and renal failure). Alcohol abuse affects brain, liver, cardiac, and endocrine tissue. Heroin produces acute overdose through respiratory depression, and its IV route of administration increases the risk of AIDS, viral hepatitis, pneumonia, sepsis, and endocarditis.

Function Structured interviews such as the Addiction Severity Index (ASI)5 can be used to assess functional impairment. Because addicted patients may be reluctant to disclose sensitive personal information, it is important to collect collateral information from family and friends, laboratory tests, and medical records.

Psychiatric concerns Many psychiatric syndromes are caused by substance abuse. Cocaine intoxication is often associated with psychosis (paranoia, auditory and tactile hallucinations), panic anxiety, and aggressiveness, whereas cocaine withdrawal produces depressed mood. Depression is also highly associated with chronic alcohol and opiate dependence. Withdrawal from opioids, alcohol, and sedatives produces anxiety.

 

 

Patients with bipolar disorder, major depression, panic anxiety, and schizophrenia who present with co-occurring addiction require coordinated and simultaneous stabilization of their addictive and psychiatric disorders.

Table 1

12 PRINCIPLES OF EFFECTIVE OUTPATIENT ADDICTION TREATMENT

  1. Open the doors wider
  2. Do a comprehensive initial evaluation
  3. Build on existing motivation
  4. Forge a therapeutic alliance
  5. Make retention a priority
  6. Provide ongoing care
  7. Match services with treatment needs
  8. Monitor abstinence
  9. Use 12-step and other community supports
  10. Manage medications
  11. Educate about addiction and recovery
  12. Involve families in treatment

Principle 3: Build on existing motivation

That an addicted patient must “hit bottom” before successful treatment may begin is a common misconception. In truth, studies find similar outcomes in individuals who enter treatment voluntarily and those who are externally pressured or legally coerced.6 Regardless of patients’ motivation when they enter treatment, they are likely to alternate over time between being more and less motivated. For this reason, it is necessary to remind them why they sought treatment and to use existing external pressures.

For example, with the patient’s consent it would be valuable to maintain contact with a parole officer who mandated a patient’s substance-abuse treatment. Likewise, patients entering treatment under threat of divorce should be asked to consent to family contact and should receive family therapy. Families often provide useful clinical information and can exert powerful influence when the patient’s motivation wanes. A patient’s refusal to allow contact with family (or other important sources of collateral information) often represents resistance that should be explored clinically and addressed.

With open dialogue, resistance to treatment can be reduced with education, peer groups, and family therapy. Motivational enhancement and interviewing work described by Miller, Procaska, and DiClemente7,8 is designed to reduce treatment resistance in a respectful and clinically effective manner while avoiding confrontation that might provoke dropout and relapse.

Principle 4: Forge a therapeutic alliance

A therapeutic alliance produces positive outcomes in substance-dependent outpatients.9-11 A recent National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) therapy manual notes that a therapeutic alliance exists when the patient perceives that:

  • the clinician accepts and respects him or her;
  • the patient’s problems can be overcome by working together with the clinician;
  • the clinician understands what the patient is hoping to get out of treatment.12

Clinicians can help forge this therapeutic alliance by being active listeners, by being empathic and nonjudgmental, and by approaching treatment as an active collaboration.12

Principle 5: Make retention a priority

It is simple but true: you cannot treat a patient who has dropped out.

Treatment retention is associated with better outcomes13,14 and is a key indicator of the performance of an outpatient treatment program. High drop-out rates are demoralizing to patients who remain in treatment and to the clinicians who must document so-called “3-day treatments.” Because admission and initial evaluation of patients is labor-intensive, premature attrition is costly and time-consuming. Strategies to increase retention are listed in Table 2.

Table 2

STRATEGIES TO RETAIN PATIENTS IN TREATMENT

  • Preadmission telephone screening interviews
  • Telephone and mailed reminders
  • Telephone orientations
  • Providing timely appointments

Clinicians can improve retention by tolerating different rates of change and levels of motivation. Individuals adopt new behaviors at different rates. You might become frustrated when patients do not immediately “buy” a particular version of recovery. Patients, however, often drop out when they feel they are being “force-fed” recommendations for sacrifice and major lifestyle changes that make no sense to them (at least not at the moment).

Principle 6: Provide ongoing care

Addiction is a complex biopsychosocial problem that requires long-term treatment. Even after extended abstinence, substance abusers experience craving and are vulnerable to relapse.

Addicts often enter outpatient treatment with psychosocial, medical, and psychiatric problems. Transformation from active addiction to full functioning in society requires sustained and conscientious effort by the patient, support system, and treatment team. Like asthma, diabetes, and other chronic diseases, addiction requires ongoing care.15

Unlike other chronic conditions, however, addiction is pleasure-reinforced, and addicted individuals are particularly at risk for relapse. Ongoing care may interrupt a relapse or at least interrupt it sooner than if no ongoing treatment were provided.

Substance dependence treatment for less than 90 days is of little or no use, and treatment lasting significantly longer often is indicated, according to the NIDA.16 When patients complete an intensive treatment phase, they should be evaluated for readiness to transfer to less-intensive care, with gradual transition from several therapeutic contacts per week, to weekly contact, to semimonthly contact, and so on. The concept of “graduation” should clearly convey not an ending but a “commencement” or beginning, as it does in college.

Unfortunately, the long-term approach to substance dependence is undermined by managed care organizations’ insistence on brief treatments. Also, regulations that view addiction as an acute episode may require that patient charts be closed at the end of intensive treatment. Such failures to appreciate the chronic nature of addiction undermine access to treatment and service delivery and contribute to recidivism and medical, social, criminal, and economic consequences associated with active addiction.

 

 

Principle 7: Match services with treatment needs

Outcomes improve when treatment services meet individual needs.17 Medical, psychiatric, psychosocial, legal, and housing problems can distract patients from the work of therapy. It is important to match each patient’s problems and needs with appropriate treatment settings, interventions, and services, according to the NIDA’s Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment.16 Creating flexible, responsive programs means more work for the treatment team, but it enhances the quality of care.

Treating concomitant psychiatric illness often requires innovations in outpatient treatment programs. For example, psychiatrists must avoid undermining treatment by inappropriately prescribing addictive agents such as benzodiazepines. At the same time, drug counselors may benefit from education about the potential benefits of medications in treating co-occuring disorders and craving. Coordinated delivery of psychiatric and rehabilitative treatment requires open communication in regularly scheduled multidisciplinary team meetings.

Principle 8: Monitor abstinence

Routine urine drug screens, Breathalyzer tests—administered at least weekly— and/or other laboratory tests to confirm self-reported abstinence can improve treatment outcomes. Regular drug and alcohol monitoring provides an objective indicator of progress, serves as a deterrent, and can help motivate the patient to withstand drug urges.

Individuals attempting abstinence from one substance have better outcomes if they abstain from all addictive substances18 (although tobacco use is controversial and requires further research). Even so, patients often continue to use addictive substances during treatment. Patients struggling with abstinence should not be discharged from treatment programs for manifesting the symptoms for which they are seeking treatment.

Substance-dependent individuals progress at different rates during treatment, and creative strategies to enhance motivation and retention can ultimately produce positive results. Outpatient clinics should consider different treatment tracks for patients at different stages of readiness for recovery.

Box 2

ADDICTION RESOURCES ON THE WEB

Principle 9: Use 12-step and other community supports

Patients who participate in 12-step programs and treatments have better outcomes than those who do not.19-21 Still, patients in early recovery may find it difficult to join community-based support groups, such as Alcoholics Anonymous (AA). Patients are often ambivalent about—or strongly opposed to—joining AA because of embarrassment, negative experiences, or inadequate preparation for joining a 12-step fellowship. Substance abusers who are ambivalent about recovery often dispute 12-step directives on total abstinence, sweeping lifestyle changes, and the need to “give up control” over treatment recommendations. Common issues in early recovery include:

  • how to select a 12-step home group and a sponsor;
  • how to overcome uneasiness associated with being in a 12-step group;
  • how to address any discomfort the patient may feel with the religious nature of 12-step meetings.22

Patients’ resistance to 12-step treatment should be explored and addressed. Sometimes all they need is encouragement and help in finding a sponsor. Those with more difficult concerns may need a different approach. For example, social phobia is common in alcoholics and can be exacerbated by 12-step meetings; symptoms often respond to beta-adrenergic blockade. Patients with schizophrenia and those with paranoid features often do poorly in 12-step treatment if their paranoid symptoms cannot be successfully managed.

Principle 10: Manage medications

To avoid drug interactions, all prescribers involved with the patient’s care should coordinate their medication management efforts. Many substance abusers suffer from co-occurring psychiatric conditions23 for which psychiatric medications are standard treatment.24,25 In addition, medical detoxification is often necessary for heroin, alcohol, and sedative/hypnotic-dependent individuals. These treatments, which are beyond the scope of this article, are best integrated with drug rehabilitation.

Various medications for addiction have been reported to improve outcome:

  • Agonist treatment with methadone, a long-acting opioid, can reduce heroin use, crime, and the risk of illnesses such as AIDS and viral hepatitis that are associated with IV drug use.
  • Buprenorphine, a partial opioid receptor agonist with similar benefits, may soon be approved for the treatment of opiate dependence in outpatient settings.26
  • Naltrexone, an opioid receptor antagonist, has long been proposed as a treatment for opiate dependence and has been shown to be effective in alcoholism.27

No effective pharmacologic treatment is available for cocaine dependence, although this is the focus of extensive government-sponsored research.

Principle 11: Educate about addiction and recovery

A wealth of accurate, free information about addiction and recovery is available through Web sites (Box 2) and other sources.

 

 

Ideally, outpatients in early recovery should be oriented in how to refuse offers of addictive substances, stress management, relapse prevention, information about the biology of addiction, 12-step fellowship integration, and appropriate use of medications.

Principle 12: Involve families in treatment

Treatment outcomes improve when addicts’ families are involved in the recovery process.28,29 Some family members enable addictive behavior by purchasing drugs for their relatives or providing money for this purpose, while other families are knowledgeable about treatment and can be a vital force supporting the recovery process

Treatment can help modify unhealthy behavior patterns that some families develop to compensate for a substance abuser’s actions. Because substance use disorders often run in families, try to assess not only the identified patient but also others in the patient’s life.

Related resources

  • Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (http://www.health.org/)
  • Miller WR. Enhancing motivation for change in substance abuse treatment. CSAT treatment improvement protocol #35. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1999.
  • Rawson R. Treatment for stimulant use disorders. CSAT treatment improvement protocol #33. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1999.
  • Mercer DE, Woody GE. An individual drug counseling approach to treat cocaine addiction: The Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study model. NIDA manual #3. Therapy manuals for drug addiction. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1999.

Disclosure

The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article.

References

1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. Treatment episode data set (TEDS): 1994-1999. National admissions to substance abuse treatment services. DASIS series: S-14. DHHS publication no. (SMA) 01-3550. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, 2001.

2. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. 1999 uniform facility data set. DASIS series: S-12. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, 2001.

3. Festinger DS, Lamb RJ, Kirby KC, Marlowe DB. The accelerated intake: a method for increasing initial attendance to outpatient cocaine treatment. J Applied Behav Analysis 1996;29(3):387-9.

4. Dackis CA, Gold MS. Psychiatric hospitals for treatment of dual diagnosis. In: Lowinson JH, ed. Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1992;467-85.

5. McLellan AT, Luborsky L, et al. An improved diagnostic instrument for substance abuse patients, The Addiction Severity Index. J Nervous Mental Dis 1980;168:26-33.

6. Marlowe DB, Kirby KC, et al. Assessment of coercive and noncoercive pressures to enter drug abuse treatment. Drug & Alcohol Dependence 1996;42(2):77-84.

7. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. The transtheoretical approach: crossing traditional boundaries of therapy. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones, Irwin, 1984.

8. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press, 1991.

9. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Beyond the therapeutic alliance: keeping the drug-dependent individual in treatment. Research monograph 165, NTIS 97-181606, Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health, 1997.

10. Connors GJ, DiClemente CC, Dermen KH, et al. Predicting the therapeutic alliance in alcoholism treatment. J Studies Alcohol 2000;61(1):139-49.

11. Barber JP, Luborsky L, Gallop R, et al. Therapeutic alliance as a predictor of outcome and retention in the National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study. J Consult Clin Psychol 2001;69(1):119-24.

12. Mercer D, Woody G. Individual drug counseling. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) manual #3: Therapy manuals for drug addiction. (NIH pub. no. 99-4380). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, 1999.

13. McKay JR, Alterman AI, McLellan AT, Snider EC. Treatment goals, continuity of care, and outcome in a day hospital substance abuse rehabilitation program. Am J Psychiatry 1994;151(2):254-9.

14. Simpson DD, Brown BS. Treatment retention and follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychol Addictive Behaviors 1998;11(4):294-307.

15. McLellan T, Kleber H, O’Brien C. Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: implications for treatment, insurance and outcomes evaluation. JAMA 2000;284:1689-95.

16. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Principles of drug addiction treatment: a research-based guide (NIH publication no. 00-4180). Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health, 1999.

17. McLellan AT, Hagan TA, Levine M, et al. Supplemental social services improve outcomes in public addiction treatment. Addiction 1998;93:1489-99.

18. Hughes JR. Treatment of smoking cessation in smokers with past alcohol/drug problems. J Substance Abuse Treatment 1993;10:181-7.

19. DuPont RL, Shiraki S. Recent research in twelve step programs. In: Miller NS, ed. Principles of Addiction Medicine Chevy Chase, MD: American Society of Addiction Medicine, 1994.

20. Crits-Christoph P, Siqueland L, Blaine J, et al. Psychosocial treatments for cocaine dependence: National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999;57(6):493-502.

21. McCrady BS, Miller WR (eds) Research on Alcoholics Anonymous New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies, 1993.

22. Nowinski J, Baker S, Carroll KM. Twelve-Step facilitation therapy manual: A clinical research guide for therapists treating individuals with alcohol abuse and dependence. NIAAA Project MATCH Monograph Series, vol. 1. DHHS Pub. No. (ADM)92-1893. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 1992.

23. Regier DA, Farmer ME, Rae DS, et al. Comorbidity of mental disorders with alcohol and other drug abuse: results from the epidemiologic catchment area (ECA) study. JAMA 1990;264(19):2511-18.

24. Carroll KM. Integrating psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy in substance abuse treatment. In: Rotgers F, Keller DS, Morgenstern J, eds. Treating substance abuse: theory and technique. New York: Guilford Press, 1996.

25. Carroll KM, Nich C, Ball SA, et al. Treatment of cocaine and alcohol dependence with psychotherapy and disulfiram. Addiction (in press).

26. Ling W, Wesson DR, Charuvastra C, Klett CJ. A controlled trial comparing buprenorphine and methadone maintenance in opioid dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996;53:401-7.

27. Volpicelli JR, Alterman AI, Hayashida M, O’Brien CP. Naltrexone in the treatment of alcohol dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992;49:876-80.

28. McCrady BS, Noel NE, Abrams DB, et al. Comparative effectiveness of three types of spouse involvement in outpatient behavioral alcoholism treatment. J Studies Alcohol 1986;47:459-67.

29. Szapocznik J, Williams RA. Brief strategic family therapy: twenty-five years of interplay among theory, research and practice in adolescent behavior problems and drug abuse. Clin Child Family Psychol Rev 2000;3(2):117-34.

References

1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. Treatment episode data set (TEDS): 1994-1999. National admissions to substance abuse treatment services. DASIS series: S-14. DHHS publication no. (SMA) 01-3550. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, 2001.

2. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. 1999 uniform facility data set. DASIS series: S-12. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, 2001.

3. Festinger DS, Lamb RJ, Kirby KC, Marlowe DB. The accelerated intake: a method for increasing initial attendance to outpatient cocaine treatment. J Applied Behav Analysis 1996;29(3):387-9.

4. Dackis CA, Gold MS. Psychiatric hospitals for treatment of dual diagnosis. In: Lowinson JH, ed. Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1992;467-85.

5. McLellan AT, Luborsky L, et al. An improved diagnostic instrument for substance abuse patients, The Addiction Severity Index. J Nervous Mental Dis 1980;168:26-33.

6. Marlowe DB, Kirby KC, et al. Assessment of coercive and noncoercive pressures to enter drug abuse treatment. Drug & Alcohol Dependence 1996;42(2):77-84.

7. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. The transtheoretical approach: crossing traditional boundaries of therapy. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones, Irwin, 1984.

8. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press, 1991.

9. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Beyond the therapeutic alliance: keeping the drug-dependent individual in treatment. Research monograph 165, NTIS 97-181606, Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health, 1997.

10. Connors GJ, DiClemente CC, Dermen KH, et al. Predicting the therapeutic alliance in alcoholism treatment. J Studies Alcohol 2000;61(1):139-49.

11. Barber JP, Luborsky L, Gallop R, et al. Therapeutic alliance as a predictor of outcome and retention in the National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study. J Consult Clin Psychol 2001;69(1):119-24.

12. Mercer D, Woody G. Individual drug counseling. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) manual #3: Therapy manuals for drug addiction. (NIH pub. no. 99-4380). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, 1999.

13. McKay JR, Alterman AI, McLellan AT, Snider EC. Treatment goals, continuity of care, and outcome in a day hospital substance abuse rehabilitation program. Am J Psychiatry 1994;151(2):254-9.

14. Simpson DD, Brown BS. Treatment retention and follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychol Addictive Behaviors 1998;11(4):294-307.

15. McLellan T, Kleber H, O’Brien C. Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: implications for treatment, insurance and outcomes evaluation. JAMA 2000;284:1689-95.

16. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Principles of drug addiction treatment: a research-based guide (NIH publication no. 00-4180). Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health, 1999.

17. McLellan AT, Hagan TA, Levine M, et al. Supplemental social services improve outcomes in public addiction treatment. Addiction 1998;93:1489-99.

18. Hughes JR. Treatment of smoking cessation in smokers with past alcohol/drug problems. J Substance Abuse Treatment 1993;10:181-7.

19. DuPont RL, Shiraki S. Recent research in twelve step programs. In: Miller NS, ed. Principles of Addiction Medicine Chevy Chase, MD: American Society of Addiction Medicine, 1994.

20. Crits-Christoph P, Siqueland L, Blaine J, et al. Psychosocial treatments for cocaine dependence: National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999;57(6):493-502.

21. McCrady BS, Miller WR (eds) Research on Alcoholics Anonymous New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies, 1993.

22. Nowinski J, Baker S, Carroll KM. Twelve-Step facilitation therapy manual: A clinical research guide for therapists treating individuals with alcohol abuse and dependence. NIAAA Project MATCH Monograph Series, vol. 1. DHHS Pub. No. (ADM)92-1893. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 1992.

23. Regier DA, Farmer ME, Rae DS, et al. Comorbidity of mental disorders with alcohol and other drug abuse: results from the epidemiologic catchment area (ECA) study. JAMA 1990;264(19):2511-18.

24. Carroll KM. Integrating psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy in substance abuse treatment. In: Rotgers F, Keller DS, Morgenstern J, eds. Treating substance abuse: theory and technique. New York: Guilford Press, 1996.

25. Carroll KM, Nich C, Ball SA, et al. Treatment of cocaine and alcohol dependence with psychotherapy and disulfiram. Addiction (in press).

26. Ling W, Wesson DR, Charuvastra C, Klett CJ. A controlled trial comparing buprenorphine and methadone maintenance in opioid dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996;53:401-7.

27. Volpicelli JR, Alterman AI, Hayashida M, O’Brien CP. Naltrexone in the treatment of alcohol dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992;49:876-80.

28. McCrady BS, Noel NE, Abrams DB, et al. Comparative effectiveness of three types of spouse involvement in outpatient behavioral alcoholism treatment. J Studies Alcohol 1986;47:459-67.

29. Szapocznik J, Williams RA. Brief strategic family therapy: twenty-five years of interplay among theory, research and practice in adolescent behavior problems and drug abuse. Clin Child Family Psychol Rev 2000;3(2):117-34.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 01(06)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 01(06)
Page Number
16-24
Page Number
16-24
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Substance abuse: 12 principles to more effective outpatient treatment
Display Headline
Substance abuse: 12 principles to more effective outpatient treatment
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media