User login
FROM AN ACIP MEETING
by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) after a lengthy debate over specifics regarding recommendations for pregnant women.
The proposed recommendation that sparked the debate would change the wording of the previous recommendation for pregnant women to receive a seasonal inactivated vaccine (IIV) to “any licensed, recommended, and age-appropriate, trivalent or quadrivalent IIV or RIV [recombinant influenza vaccine] may be used.”
“I think there’s a subtle, but important difference here between making what would appear to be an affirmative statement that RIV is safe in pregnant women, versus just staying silent on it, and saying ‘we’re not saying you shouldn’t use it, but we don’t have enough data to affirmatively say it is safe,’ ” said Cindy Pellegrini, senior vice president of Public Policy and Government Affairs at the March of Dimes Foundation.
In response, members of the committee pointed out that the responsibility of determining safety lies with the Food and Drug Administration, which has already licensed the Flublok trivalent vaccine with expectations that the quadrivalent vaccine soon will follow.
While Lisa Grohskopf, MD, MPH, medical officer of the influenza division of the CDC, did acknowledge that there were more data on the safety of inactivated influenza vaccines, she asserted to the committee that “the general overall safety profile of Flublok in comparison to inactivated vaccines is reassuring.”
“For example, one concern that arises is reactogenicity and inflammation. [In terms of] overall reactogenicity in the studies where Flublok and inactivated vaccines have been compared, rates of the adverse and systemic reactions were similar,” Dr. Grohskopf said.
A motion was made to change the wording of the recommendation; however, the motion was not passed, and the eventual vote on the approval was conducted.
The ACIP also voted unanimously to change the safe age limit noted in influenza guidelines for use of Afluria (IIV3) from 9 years and older to 5 years and older. A footnote saying that the ACIP recommends Afluria for children 9 years and older will be removed.
This change, which mirrors the licensing Afluria has with the FDA, was based on research conducted by Seqirus that showed fever levels were the same for Afluria trivalent and quadrivalent vaccines in children 5 to 9 years old, both of which were less than historical vaccine rates.
The approved recommendations will be sent to the director of the CDC and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Once reviewed and approved, the final recommendations will be published in the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. The committee members had no relevant financial disclosures.
[email protected]
On Twitter @eaztweets
FROM AN ACIP MEETING
by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) after a lengthy debate over specifics regarding recommendations for pregnant women.
The proposed recommendation that sparked the debate would change the wording of the previous recommendation for pregnant women to receive a seasonal inactivated vaccine (IIV) to “any licensed, recommended, and age-appropriate, trivalent or quadrivalent IIV or RIV [recombinant influenza vaccine] may be used.”
“I think there’s a subtle, but important difference here between making what would appear to be an affirmative statement that RIV is safe in pregnant women, versus just staying silent on it, and saying ‘we’re not saying you shouldn’t use it, but we don’t have enough data to affirmatively say it is safe,’ ” said Cindy Pellegrini, senior vice president of Public Policy and Government Affairs at the March of Dimes Foundation.
In response, members of the committee pointed out that the responsibility of determining safety lies with the Food and Drug Administration, which has already licensed the Flublok trivalent vaccine with expectations that the quadrivalent vaccine soon will follow.
While Lisa Grohskopf, MD, MPH, medical officer of the influenza division of the CDC, did acknowledge that there were more data on the safety of inactivated influenza vaccines, she asserted to the committee that “the general overall safety profile of Flublok in comparison to inactivated vaccines is reassuring.”
“For example, one concern that arises is reactogenicity and inflammation. [In terms of] overall reactogenicity in the studies where Flublok and inactivated vaccines have been compared, rates of the adverse and systemic reactions were similar,” Dr. Grohskopf said.
A motion was made to change the wording of the recommendation; however, the motion was not passed, and the eventual vote on the approval was conducted.
The ACIP also voted unanimously to change the safe age limit noted in influenza guidelines for use of Afluria (IIV3) from 9 years and older to 5 years and older. A footnote saying that the ACIP recommends Afluria for children 9 years and older will be removed.
This change, which mirrors the licensing Afluria has with the FDA, was based on research conducted by Seqirus that showed fever levels were the same for Afluria trivalent and quadrivalent vaccines in children 5 to 9 years old, both of which were less than historical vaccine rates.
The approved recommendations will be sent to the director of the CDC and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Once reviewed and approved, the final recommendations will be published in the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. The committee members had no relevant financial disclosures.
[email protected]
On Twitter @eaztweets
FROM AN ACIP MEETING
by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) after a lengthy debate over specifics regarding recommendations for pregnant women.
The proposed recommendation that sparked the debate would change the wording of the previous recommendation for pregnant women to receive a seasonal inactivated vaccine (IIV) to “any licensed, recommended, and age-appropriate, trivalent or quadrivalent IIV or RIV [recombinant influenza vaccine] may be used.”
“I think there’s a subtle, but important difference here between making what would appear to be an affirmative statement that RIV is safe in pregnant women, versus just staying silent on it, and saying ‘we’re not saying you shouldn’t use it, but we don’t have enough data to affirmatively say it is safe,’ ” said Cindy Pellegrini, senior vice president of Public Policy and Government Affairs at the March of Dimes Foundation.
In response, members of the committee pointed out that the responsibility of determining safety lies with the Food and Drug Administration, which has already licensed the Flublok trivalent vaccine with expectations that the quadrivalent vaccine soon will follow.
While Lisa Grohskopf, MD, MPH, medical officer of the influenza division of the CDC, did acknowledge that there were more data on the safety of inactivated influenza vaccines, she asserted to the committee that “the general overall safety profile of Flublok in comparison to inactivated vaccines is reassuring.”
“For example, one concern that arises is reactogenicity and inflammation. [In terms of] overall reactogenicity in the studies where Flublok and inactivated vaccines have been compared, rates of the adverse and systemic reactions were similar,” Dr. Grohskopf said.
A motion was made to change the wording of the recommendation; however, the motion was not passed, and the eventual vote on the approval was conducted.
The ACIP also voted unanimously to change the safe age limit noted in influenza guidelines for use of Afluria (IIV3) from 9 years and older to 5 years and older. A footnote saying that the ACIP recommends Afluria for children 9 years and older will be removed.
This change, which mirrors the licensing Afluria has with the FDA, was based on research conducted by Seqirus that showed fever levels were the same for Afluria trivalent and quadrivalent vaccines in children 5 to 9 years old, both of which were less than historical vaccine rates.
The approved recommendations will be sent to the director of the CDC and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Once reviewed and approved, the final recommendations will be published in the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. The committee members had no relevant financial disclosures.
[email protected]
On Twitter @eaztweets