User login
Key clinical point: Oral calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists appeared to be safer and better tolerated than triptans for the treatment of acute migraine and could be a viable option for patients who experience overall triptan-associated adverse events (AE).
Major finding: Oral CGRP receptor antagonists were safer than triptans in terms of any AE (risk ratio [RR] 0.78; P = .03) and treatment-related AE (RR 0.68; P < .00001), with the incidence of dizziness (RR 0.69; P = .01), dry mouth (RR 0.72; P = .02), fatigue (RR 0.52; P = .001), paresthesia (RR 0.34; P < .0001), and somnolence (RR 0.65; P = .004) being lower with oral CGRP receptor antagonists vs triptans.
Study details: The data come from a meta-analysis of 15 trials including 13,270 patients who received oral CGRP receptor antagonists (n = 8240), placebo (n = 4253), or triptans (n = 777) for the treatment of acute migraine.
Disclosures: This study was funded by a National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korea government. The authors declared no competing interests.
Source: Lee S et al. Safety evaluation of oral calcitonin-gene–related peptide receptor antagonists in patients with acute migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 (Jun 22). Doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03347-6
Key clinical point: Oral calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists appeared to be safer and better tolerated than triptans for the treatment of acute migraine and could be a viable option for patients who experience overall triptan-associated adverse events (AE).
Major finding: Oral CGRP receptor antagonists were safer than triptans in terms of any AE (risk ratio [RR] 0.78; P = .03) and treatment-related AE (RR 0.68; P < .00001), with the incidence of dizziness (RR 0.69; P = .01), dry mouth (RR 0.72; P = .02), fatigue (RR 0.52; P = .001), paresthesia (RR 0.34; P < .0001), and somnolence (RR 0.65; P = .004) being lower with oral CGRP receptor antagonists vs triptans.
Study details: The data come from a meta-analysis of 15 trials including 13,270 patients who received oral CGRP receptor antagonists (n = 8240), placebo (n = 4253), or triptans (n = 777) for the treatment of acute migraine.
Disclosures: This study was funded by a National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korea government. The authors declared no competing interests.
Source: Lee S et al. Safety evaluation of oral calcitonin-gene–related peptide receptor antagonists in patients with acute migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 (Jun 22). Doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03347-6
Key clinical point: Oral calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists appeared to be safer and better tolerated than triptans for the treatment of acute migraine and could be a viable option for patients who experience overall triptan-associated adverse events (AE).
Major finding: Oral CGRP receptor antagonists were safer than triptans in terms of any AE (risk ratio [RR] 0.78; P = .03) and treatment-related AE (RR 0.68; P < .00001), with the incidence of dizziness (RR 0.69; P = .01), dry mouth (RR 0.72; P = .02), fatigue (RR 0.52; P = .001), paresthesia (RR 0.34; P < .0001), and somnolence (RR 0.65; P = .004) being lower with oral CGRP receptor antagonists vs triptans.
Study details: The data come from a meta-analysis of 15 trials including 13,270 patients who received oral CGRP receptor antagonists (n = 8240), placebo (n = 4253), or triptans (n = 777) for the treatment of acute migraine.
Disclosures: This study was funded by a National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korea government. The authors declared no competing interests.
Source: Lee S et al. Safety evaluation of oral calcitonin-gene–related peptide receptor antagonists in patients with acute migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 (Jun 22). Doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03347-6