User login
Key clinical point: Patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who respond inadequately to ustekinumab should preferably be switched to brodalumab rather than guselkumab.
Major finding: Patients with an inadequate response to ustekinumab who switched to brodalumab vs guselkumab had higher Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 100 response rate at week 36 (40.3% vs 20.0%; P < .001) and PASI 90 response rate at weeks 12 (62.7% vs 48.1%; P = .002) and 36 (63.7% vs 51.1%; P = .004).
Study details: This matching-adjusted indirect comparison study employed data for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who responded inadequately to ustekinumab and switched to receive brodalumab (n=121) in AMAGINE-2 and -3 and or to receive guselkumab (n=135) in NAVIGATE, phase 3, trials.
Disclosures: The study was supported by LEO Pharma A/S. P Hampton and M Augustin declared receiving research/educational grants, consultation/speaker honoraria, and/or travel expenses and serving as an advisory board member or clinical trial participant for various companies, including LEO Pharma. E Borg is a current employee and JB Hansen is a former employee of LEO Pharma.
Source: Hampton P et al. Psoriasis (Auckl). 2021 Nov 3. doi: 10.2147/PTT.S326121.
Key clinical point: Patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who respond inadequately to ustekinumab should preferably be switched to brodalumab rather than guselkumab.
Major finding: Patients with an inadequate response to ustekinumab who switched to brodalumab vs guselkumab had higher Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 100 response rate at week 36 (40.3% vs 20.0%; P < .001) and PASI 90 response rate at weeks 12 (62.7% vs 48.1%; P = .002) and 36 (63.7% vs 51.1%; P = .004).
Study details: This matching-adjusted indirect comparison study employed data for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who responded inadequately to ustekinumab and switched to receive brodalumab (n=121) in AMAGINE-2 and -3 and or to receive guselkumab (n=135) in NAVIGATE, phase 3, trials.
Disclosures: The study was supported by LEO Pharma A/S. P Hampton and M Augustin declared receiving research/educational grants, consultation/speaker honoraria, and/or travel expenses and serving as an advisory board member or clinical trial participant for various companies, including LEO Pharma. E Borg is a current employee and JB Hansen is a former employee of LEO Pharma.
Source: Hampton P et al. Psoriasis (Auckl). 2021 Nov 3. doi: 10.2147/PTT.S326121.
Key clinical point: Patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who respond inadequately to ustekinumab should preferably be switched to brodalumab rather than guselkumab.
Major finding: Patients with an inadequate response to ustekinumab who switched to brodalumab vs guselkumab had higher Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 100 response rate at week 36 (40.3% vs 20.0%; P < .001) and PASI 90 response rate at weeks 12 (62.7% vs 48.1%; P = .002) and 36 (63.7% vs 51.1%; P = .004).
Study details: This matching-adjusted indirect comparison study employed data for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who responded inadequately to ustekinumab and switched to receive brodalumab (n=121) in AMAGINE-2 and -3 and or to receive guselkumab (n=135) in NAVIGATE, phase 3, trials.
Disclosures: The study was supported by LEO Pharma A/S. P Hampton and M Augustin declared receiving research/educational grants, consultation/speaker honoraria, and/or travel expenses and serving as an advisory board member or clinical trial participant for various companies, including LEO Pharma. E Borg is a current employee and JB Hansen is a former employee of LEO Pharma.
Source: Hampton P et al. Psoriasis (Auckl). 2021 Nov 3. doi: 10.2147/PTT.S326121.