Article Type
Changed
Mon, 11/01/2021 - 17:01

Key clinical point: Switching biologics in patients with psoriasis was mostly impelled by secondary lack of efficacy for skin symptoms with young age and the presence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) linked to a higher frequency of switching in the long-term.

Major finding: Switching of first- and second-line biologics was likely attributed to a secondary lack of efficacy for skin disease. Each unit increase in age decreased the likelihood of switching twice or more by 4% (odds ratio [OR], 0.964; P = .038), whereas the existence of PsA increased the likelihood by 2.69-fold (OR, 2.69; P = .026).

Study details: This was a retrospective study including 115 adult patients with psoriasis who had been receiving biologics for 12 consecutive months or more and underwent at least a single biologic switch.

Disclosures: No specific funding for the study was disclosed. The authors declared no potential conflict of interests.

Source: Akdogan N et al. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Sep 23. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2021.1979394.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Switching biologics in patients with psoriasis was mostly impelled by secondary lack of efficacy for skin symptoms with young age and the presence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) linked to a higher frequency of switching in the long-term.

Major finding: Switching of first- and second-line biologics was likely attributed to a secondary lack of efficacy for skin disease. Each unit increase in age decreased the likelihood of switching twice or more by 4% (odds ratio [OR], 0.964; P = .038), whereas the existence of PsA increased the likelihood by 2.69-fold (OR, 2.69; P = .026).

Study details: This was a retrospective study including 115 adult patients with psoriasis who had been receiving biologics for 12 consecutive months or more and underwent at least a single biologic switch.

Disclosures: No specific funding for the study was disclosed. The authors declared no potential conflict of interests.

Source: Akdogan N et al. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Sep 23. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2021.1979394.

Key clinical point: Switching biologics in patients with psoriasis was mostly impelled by secondary lack of efficacy for skin symptoms with young age and the presence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) linked to a higher frequency of switching in the long-term.

Major finding: Switching of first- and second-line biologics was likely attributed to a secondary lack of efficacy for skin disease. Each unit increase in age decreased the likelihood of switching twice or more by 4% (odds ratio [OR], 0.964; P = .038), whereas the existence of PsA increased the likelihood by 2.69-fold (OR, 2.69; P = .026).

Study details: This was a retrospective study including 115 adult patients with psoriasis who had been receiving biologics for 12 consecutive months or more and underwent at least a single biologic switch.

Disclosures: No specific funding for the study was disclosed. The authors declared no potential conflict of interests.

Source: Akdogan N et al. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Sep 23. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2021.1979394.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Psoriasis November 2021
Gate On Date
Sun, 08/29/2021 - 16:45
Un-Gate On Date
Sun, 08/29/2021 - 16:45
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Sun, 08/29/2021 - 16:45
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article