Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/28/2018 - 10:48
Display Headline
Did failure to note calcifications delay breast cancer diagnosis?

Lavaca County (Tex) District Court

Twenty-two months after undergoing a mammogram that was reported as normal, a woman in her forties detected a mass in her breast. A biopsy confirmed stage II breast cancer.

In suing, the woman claimed that the radiologist who read her mammogram was negligent for not identifying suspicious calcifications or recommending further evaluation. She argued that the delay in diagnosis allowed the malignancy to advance, thus lowering her life expectancy and making lymph node dissection, chemotherapy, and radiation necessary.

The physician argued that the mass was not visible in the mammogram and that the delay did not have a significant effect on her life expectancy.

  • The case settled for $300,000.
The cases presented here were compiled by Lewis L. Laska, editor of Medical Malpractice Verdicts, Settlements & Experts (www.verdictslaska.com). While there are instances when the available information is incomplete, these cases represent the types of clinical situations that typically result in litigation.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Issue
OBG Management - 16(03)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
70-73
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Article PDF
Article PDF

Lavaca County (Tex) District Court

Twenty-two months after undergoing a mammogram that was reported as normal, a woman in her forties detected a mass in her breast. A biopsy confirmed stage II breast cancer.

In suing, the woman claimed that the radiologist who read her mammogram was negligent for not identifying suspicious calcifications or recommending further evaluation. She argued that the delay in diagnosis allowed the malignancy to advance, thus lowering her life expectancy and making lymph node dissection, chemotherapy, and radiation necessary.

The physician argued that the mass was not visible in the mammogram and that the delay did not have a significant effect on her life expectancy.

  • The case settled for $300,000.
The cases presented here were compiled by Lewis L. Laska, editor of Medical Malpractice Verdicts, Settlements & Experts (www.verdictslaska.com). While there are instances when the available information is incomplete, these cases represent the types of clinical situations that typically result in litigation.

Lavaca County (Tex) District Court

Twenty-two months after undergoing a mammogram that was reported as normal, a woman in her forties detected a mass in her breast. A biopsy confirmed stage II breast cancer.

In suing, the woman claimed that the radiologist who read her mammogram was negligent for not identifying suspicious calcifications or recommending further evaluation. She argued that the delay in diagnosis allowed the malignancy to advance, thus lowering her life expectancy and making lymph node dissection, chemotherapy, and radiation necessary.

The physician argued that the mass was not visible in the mammogram and that the delay did not have a significant effect on her life expectancy.

  • The case settled for $300,000.
The cases presented here were compiled by Lewis L. Laska, editor of Medical Malpractice Verdicts, Settlements & Experts (www.verdictslaska.com). While there are instances when the available information is incomplete, these cases represent the types of clinical situations that typically result in litigation.
Issue
OBG Management - 16(03)
Issue
OBG Management - 16(03)
Page Number
70-73
Page Number
70-73
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Did failure to note calcifications delay breast cancer diagnosis?
Display Headline
Did failure to note calcifications delay breast cancer diagnosis?
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media