User login
Photo by Rhoda Baer
The goal for many cancer patients is to reach the 5-year mark without progression, but a new study suggests 2 years might be a more appropriate goal for patients with follicular lymphoma (FL).
Previous research indicated that about 20% of FL patients relapse within 2 years of treatment.
Now, researchers have found these patients have a significantly worse 5-year survival rate than patients who make it past the 2-year mark without progressing.
Carla Casulo, MD, of the University of Rochester in New York, and her colleagues recounted these findings in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
The team analyzed data from 588 patients with stage 2-4 FL who received first-line therapy with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP).
These patients could be separated into 2 groups: those with disease progression within 2 years of diagnosis (19%, n=110) and those who did not progress within the 2-year period (71%, n=420).
Eight percent of patients (n=46) were lost to follow-up, and 2% (n=12) died of causes other than progression within the 2-year period.
At 2 years, the overall survival (OS) rate was 68% in the early progression group and 97% in the group that did not progress. At 5 years, OS rates were 50% and 90%, respectively.
In unadjusted Cox regression analysis, early progression was associated with lower OS (hazard ratio[HR]=7.17). The same was true after the researchers adjusted for FLIPI score (HR=6.44).
The team observed similar results in a validation cohort of 147 FL patients who received first-line R-CHOP. At 2 years, the OS rate was 64% in the early progression group and 98% in the group that did not progress. At 5 years, OS rates were 34% and 94%, respectively.
Again, in an unadjusted analysis, early progression was associated with lower OS (HR=20.0). And this trend was maintained after the researchers adjusted for FLIPI score (HR=19.8).
The researchers also found that, for patients in the early progression group, clinical factors that were predictive of inferior OS were age, ECOG performance score, nodal sites, and disease stage. For the group that did not progress within 2 years, clinical factors that were predictive of OS were age and extranodal sites.
In a Cox regression analysis that encompassed these factors and early progression, only early progression, age, and ECOG performance scores remained significantly predictive of OS.
“[W]e have confirmed that all relapsed patients are not equal and therefore should not be approached the same at diagnosis, nor at the time of relapse, in terms of therapies,” Dr Casulo said.
“It will be critical to predict who is most likely to relapse early. We believe that targeted sequencing or gene-expression profiling will be important to understanding how to improve the outcomes of this group.” 
Photo by Rhoda Baer
The goal for many cancer patients is to reach the 5-year mark without progression, but a new study suggests 2 years might be a more appropriate goal for patients with follicular lymphoma (FL).
Previous research indicated that about 20% of FL patients relapse within 2 years of treatment.
Now, researchers have found these patients have a significantly worse 5-year survival rate than patients who make it past the 2-year mark without progressing.
Carla Casulo, MD, of the University of Rochester in New York, and her colleagues recounted these findings in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
The team analyzed data from 588 patients with stage 2-4 FL who received first-line therapy with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP).
These patients could be separated into 2 groups: those with disease progression within 2 years of diagnosis (19%, n=110) and those who did not progress within the 2-year period (71%, n=420).
Eight percent of patients (n=46) were lost to follow-up, and 2% (n=12) died of causes other than progression within the 2-year period.
At 2 years, the overall survival (OS) rate was 68% in the early progression group and 97% in the group that did not progress. At 5 years, OS rates were 50% and 90%, respectively.
In unadjusted Cox regression analysis, early progression was associated with lower OS (hazard ratio[HR]=7.17). The same was true after the researchers adjusted for FLIPI score (HR=6.44).
The team observed similar results in a validation cohort of 147 FL patients who received first-line R-CHOP. At 2 years, the OS rate was 64% in the early progression group and 98% in the group that did not progress. At 5 years, OS rates were 34% and 94%, respectively.
Again, in an unadjusted analysis, early progression was associated with lower OS (HR=20.0). And this trend was maintained after the researchers adjusted for FLIPI score (HR=19.8).
The researchers also found that, for patients in the early progression group, clinical factors that were predictive of inferior OS were age, ECOG performance score, nodal sites, and disease stage. For the group that did not progress within 2 years, clinical factors that were predictive of OS were age and extranodal sites.
In a Cox regression analysis that encompassed these factors and early progression, only early progression, age, and ECOG performance scores remained significantly predictive of OS.
“[W]e have confirmed that all relapsed patients are not equal and therefore should not be approached the same at diagnosis, nor at the time of relapse, in terms of therapies,” Dr Casulo said.
“It will be critical to predict who is most likely to relapse early. We believe that targeted sequencing or gene-expression profiling will be important to understanding how to improve the outcomes of this group.”
Photo by Rhoda Baer
The goal for many cancer patients is to reach the 5-year mark without progression, but a new study suggests 2 years might be a more appropriate goal for patients with follicular lymphoma (FL).
Previous research indicated that about 20% of FL patients relapse within 2 years of treatment.
Now, researchers have found these patients have a significantly worse 5-year survival rate than patients who make it past the 2-year mark without progressing.
Carla Casulo, MD, of the University of Rochester in New York, and her colleagues recounted these findings in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
The team analyzed data from 588 patients with stage 2-4 FL who received first-line therapy with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP).
These patients could be separated into 2 groups: those with disease progression within 2 years of diagnosis (19%, n=110) and those who did not progress within the 2-year period (71%, n=420).
Eight percent of patients (n=46) were lost to follow-up, and 2% (n=12) died of causes other than progression within the 2-year period.
At 2 years, the overall survival (OS) rate was 68% in the early progression group and 97% in the group that did not progress. At 5 years, OS rates were 50% and 90%, respectively.
In unadjusted Cox regression analysis, early progression was associated with lower OS (hazard ratio[HR]=7.17). The same was true after the researchers adjusted for FLIPI score (HR=6.44).
The team observed similar results in a validation cohort of 147 FL patients who received first-line R-CHOP. At 2 years, the OS rate was 64% in the early progression group and 98% in the group that did not progress. At 5 years, OS rates were 34% and 94%, respectively.
Again, in an unadjusted analysis, early progression was associated with lower OS (HR=20.0). And this trend was maintained after the researchers adjusted for FLIPI score (HR=19.8).
The researchers also found that, for patients in the early progression group, clinical factors that were predictive of inferior OS were age, ECOG performance score, nodal sites, and disease stage. For the group that did not progress within 2 years, clinical factors that were predictive of OS were age and extranodal sites.
In a Cox regression analysis that encompassed these factors and early progression, only early progression, age, and ECOG performance scores remained significantly predictive of OS.
“[W]e have confirmed that all relapsed patients are not equal and therefore should not be approached the same at diagnosis, nor at the time of relapse, in terms of therapies,” Dr Casulo said.
“It will be critical to predict who is most likely to relapse early. We believe that targeted sequencing or gene-expression profiling will be important to understanding how to improve the outcomes of this group.”