Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/28/2019 - 16:08
Display Headline
Emergency brain imaging: CT or MRI?

Discuss this article at www.facebook.com/CurrentPsychiatry

Together with a clinical assessment, neuroimaging increases diagnostic accuracy of detecting neuropathology. Direct patient benefit from scanning is best documented in those with overt, new clinical signs and symptoms of neurologic or psychiatric disease.1,2

Computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the most common head scanning techniques used in emergency medicine.3 CT is quicker and cheaper, has less movement artifact, and is excellent at delineating acute hemorrhage, calcification, and bony anatomy.3,4 Unfortunately, CT exposes patients to radiation and poorly visualizes white matter or posterior fossa pathology.4

MRI is outstanding for well-defined tissue contrast in multiplanar views and excellent for identifying demyelination or metastatic processes,5 but may be contraindicated for patients with implanted metallic objects such as pacemakers, certain vascular clips or stents, and certain orthopedic devices.3-5 Some patients cannot tolerate the narrow space surrounding them during an MRI.4,5

Safety concerns with CT during pregnancy are well established, but are less clear with MRI. The opposite is true of contrast enhancement; gadolinium with MRI is better tolerated than CT procedures, for which contrast risks include allergy and renal dysfunction. When scanning for a hemorrhage, select a CT scan for patients in whom you suspect bleeding developed within the past 3 days; MRI may be better at screening for older bleeds.

For a list of indications for which a patient should undergo a CT or MRI, see the Table.1-5

Table

Indications for CT or MRI

New or first-onset psychiatric illness
Recent head trauma
Recent or advancing cognitive dysfunction
New or worsening instances of syncope, vertigo, loss of consciousness, etc.
New, worsening, or altered pattern headaches
New signs of brain pathology, eg, seizure, paresis, or brain-related visual alteration
New neurologic examination abnormalities
Concerns about intracranial infection, inflammation, metastases, or increased pressure
Change in mental status in persons age >50
Prescreening patients who are candidates for electroconvulsive therapy
Source: References 1-5


Disclosure

Dr. Lippmann reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

References

1. Pary R, Lippmann S. Clinical review of head CT scans in psychiatric patients. VA Practitioner. 1986;3:48-53.

2. Capote HA. Neuroimaging in psychiatry. Neurol Clin. 2009;27(1):237-249.

3. Malhi GS, Lagopoulos J. Making sense of neuroimaging in psychiatry. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2008;117(2):100-117.

4. Small GW, Bookheimer SY, Thompson PM, et al. Current and future uses of neuroimaging for cognitively impaired patients. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(2):161-172.

5. Broderick DF. Neuroimaging in neuropsychiatry. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2005;28(3):549-566,64.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Steven Lippmann, MD
Professor of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 12(03)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
55-55
Legacy Keywords
brain imaging; CT scan; MRI; emergency
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Steven Lippmann, MD
Professor of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY

Author and Disclosure Information

Steven Lippmann, MD
Professor of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY

Article PDF
Article PDF

Discuss this article at www.facebook.com/CurrentPsychiatry

Together with a clinical assessment, neuroimaging increases diagnostic accuracy of detecting neuropathology. Direct patient benefit from scanning is best documented in those with overt, new clinical signs and symptoms of neurologic or psychiatric disease.1,2

Computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the most common head scanning techniques used in emergency medicine.3 CT is quicker and cheaper, has less movement artifact, and is excellent at delineating acute hemorrhage, calcification, and bony anatomy.3,4 Unfortunately, CT exposes patients to radiation and poorly visualizes white matter or posterior fossa pathology.4

MRI is outstanding for well-defined tissue contrast in multiplanar views and excellent for identifying demyelination or metastatic processes,5 but may be contraindicated for patients with implanted metallic objects such as pacemakers, certain vascular clips or stents, and certain orthopedic devices.3-5 Some patients cannot tolerate the narrow space surrounding them during an MRI.4,5

Safety concerns with CT during pregnancy are well established, but are less clear with MRI. The opposite is true of contrast enhancement; gadolinium with MRI is better tolerated than CT procedures, for which contrast risks include allergy and renal dysfunction. When scanning for a hemorrhage, select a CT scan for patients in whom you suspect bleeding developed within the past 3 days; MRI may be better at screening for older bleeds.

For a list of indications for which a patient should undergo a CT or MRI, see the Table.1-5

Table

Indications for CT or MRI

New or first-onset psychiatric illness
Recent head trauma
Recent or advancing cognitive dysfunction
New or worsening instances of syncope, vertigo, loss of consciousness, etc.
New, worsening, or altered pattern headaches
New signs of brain pathology, eg, seizure, paresis, or brain-related visual alteration
New neurologic examination abnormalities
Concerns about intracranial infection, inflammation, metastases, or increased pressure
Change in mental status in persons age >50
Prescreening patients who are candidates for electroconvulsive therapy
Source: References 1-5


Disclosure

Dr. Lippmann reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Discuss this article at www.facebook.com/CurrentPsychiatry

Together with a clinical assessment, neuroimaging increases diagnostic accuracy of detecting neuropathology. Direct patient benefit from scanning is best documented in those with overt, new clinical signs and symptoms of neurologic or psychiatric disease.1,2

Computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the most common head scanning techniques used in emergency medicine.3 CT is quicker and cheaper, has less movement artifact, and is excellent at delineating acute hemorrhage, calcification, and bony anatomy.3,4 Unfortunately, CT exposes patients to radiation and poorly visualizes white matter or posterior fossa pathology.4

MRI is outstanding for well-defined tissue contrast in multiplanar views and excellent for identifying demyelination or metastatic processes,5 but may be contraindicated for patients with implanted metallic objects such as pacemakers, certain vascular clips or stents, and certain orthopedic devices.3-5 Some patients cannot tolerate the narrow space surrounding them during an MRI.4,5

Safety concerns with CT during pregnancy are well established, but are less clear with MRI. The opposite is true of contrast enhancement; gadolinium with MRI is better tolerated than CT procedures, for which contrast risks include allergy and renal dysfunction. When scanning for a hemorrhage, select a CT scan for patients in whom you suspect bleeding developed within the past 3 days; MRI may be better at screening for older bleeds.

For a list of indications for which a patient should undergo a CT or MRI, see the Table.1-5

Table

Indications for CT or MRI

New or first-onset psychiatric illness
Recent head trauma
Recent or advancing cognitive dysfunction
New or worsening instances of syncope, vertigo, loss of consciousness, etc.
New, worsening, or altered pattern headaches
New signs of brain pathology, eg, seizure, paresis, or brain-related visual alteration
New neurologic examination abnormalities
Concerns about intracranial infection, inflammation, metastases, or increased pressure
Change in mental status in persons age >50
Prescreening patients who are candidates for electroconvulsive therapy
Source: References 1-5


Disclosure

Dr. Lippmann reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

References

1. Pary R, Lippmann S. Clinical review of head CT scans in psychiatric patients. VA Practitioner. 1986;3:48-53.

2. Capote HA. Neuroimaging in psychiatry. Neurol Clin. 2009;27(1):237-249.

3. Malhi GS, Lagopoulos J. Making sense of neuroimaging in psychiatry. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2008;117(2):100-117.

4. Small GW, Bookheimer SY, Thompson PM, et al. Current and future uses of neuroimaging for cognitively impaired patients. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(2):161-172.

5. Broderick DF. Neuroimaging in neuropsychiatry. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2005;28(3):549-566,64.

References

1. Pary R, Lippmann S. Clinical review of head CT scans in psychiatric patients. VA Practitioner. 1986;3:48-53.

2. Capote HA. Neuroimaging in psychiatry. Neurol Clin. 2009;27(1):237-249.

3. Malhi GS, Lagopoulos J. Making sense of neuroimaging in psychiatry. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2008;117(2):100-117.

4. Small GW, Bookheimer SY, Thompson PM, et al. Current and future uses of neuroimaging for cognitively impaired patients. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(2):161-172.

5. Broderick DF. Neuroimaging in neuropsychiatry. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2005;28(3):549-566,64.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 12(03)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 12(03)
Page Number
55-55
Page Number
55-55
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Emergency brain imaging: CT or MRI?
Display Headline
Emergency brain imaging: CT or MRI?
Legacy Keywords
brain imaging; CT scan; MRI; emergency
Legacy Keywords
brain imaging; CT scan; MRI; emergency
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media