Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/05/2014 - 05:00
Display Headline
Expediting drug approvals may compromise safety

Prescription drugs

Credit: CDC

The introduction of expedited drug approvals in the US coincides with an increase in black box warnings and market withdrawals, a new study shows.

The researchers could not establish a causal link between the events, but they still believe physicians and patients should exercise caution when considering the use of drugs approved since 1992.

That’s when Congress passed a law allowing the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to collect fees to expedite drug approvals.

The researchers found that drugs approved after the law—the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA)—was enacted were significantly more likely than previously approved drugs to acquire a black box warning or be withdrawn for safety reasons.

“Our findings raise concern that the FDA is rushing its review of new drugs and allowing potentially unsafe medicines onto the market,” said Karen Lasser, MD, MPH, of Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center.

“As a primary care doctor, I’m wary of prescribing brand new drugs unless they’re really a breakthrough, since their full risks are often unknown. And patients should be wary too.”

Dr Lasser and her colleagues expressed this viewpoint and described the research supporting it in Health Affairs.

The researchers collected information on new molecular entities (active ingredients that have never before been marketed in the US in any form) approved by the FDA between 1975 and 2009.

Of these 748 drugs, 114 (15.2%) received one or more black box warnings, and 32 (4.3%) were withdrawn from the market for safety reasons.

Very few of the 32 withdrawn drugs had clearly unique benefits at the time of approval, but all had unique risks that eventually led to their withdrawal.

Half of all black box warnings appeared after a drug had been on the market for 12 years, and safety withdrawals have occurred as late as 30 years after a drug’s initial release.

Drugs approved after the enactment of PDUFA were significantly more likely to receive a black box warning or withdrawal than drugs approved before PDUFA’s enactment—26.7 out of 100 drugs vs 21.2 out of 100 drugs (P<0.05) at up to 16 years of follow-up.

Since the law was enacted, the average approval time for all drugs has fallen from 34 months to 16 months.

“Since PDUFA, the review times for the drugs that are eventually banned have decreased enormously,” said study author Sidney Wolfe, MD, founder of Public Citizen’s Health Research Group and author of Worst Pills, Best Pills.

“These shorter review times, combined with increased FDA authority to require further studies after approval—rather than settling safety issues before approval—possibly contributes to the increased rate of withdrawals and black box warnings.”

The researchers noted that they could not determine with certainty whether PDUFA caused the increase in drug withdrawals and black box warnings. It’s possible that other factors caused or contributed to the decrease in safety observed in recent years.

Publications
Topics

Prescription drugs

Credit: CDC

The introduction of expedited drug approvals in the US coincides with an increase in black box warnings and market withdrawals, a new study shows.

The researchers could not establish a causal link between the events, but they still believe physicians and patients should exercise caution when considering the use of drugs approved since 1992.

That’s when Congress passed a law allowing the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to collect fees to expedite drug approvals.

The researchers found that drugs approved after the law—the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA)—was enacted were significantly more likely than previously approved drugs to acquire a black box warning or be withdrawn for safety reasons.

“Our findings raise concern that the FDA is rushing its review of new drugs and allowing potentially unsafe medicines onto the market,” said Karen Lasser, MD, MPH, of Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center.

“As a primary care doctor, I’m wary of prescribing brand new drugs unless they’re really a breakthrough, since their full risks are often unknown. And patients should be wary too.”

Dr Lasser and her colleagues expressed this viewpoint and described the research supporting it in Health Affairs.

The researchers collected information on new molecular entities (active ingredients that have never before been marketed in the US in any form) approved by the FDA between 1975 and 2009.

Of these 748 drugs, 114 (15.2%) received one or more black box warnings, and 32 (4.3%) were withdrawn from the market for safety reasons.

Very few of the 32 withdrawn drugs had clearly unique benefits at the time of approval, but all had unique risks that eventually led to their withdrawal.

Half of all black box warnings appeared after a drug had been on the market for 12 years, and safety withdrawals have occurred as late as 30 years after a drug’s initial release.

Drugs approved after the enactment of PDUFA were significantly more likely to receive a black box warning or withdrawal than drugs approved before PDUFA’s enactment—26.7 out of 100 drugs vs 21.2 out of 100 drugs (P<0.05) at up to 16 years of follow-up.

Since the law was enacted, the average approval time for all drugs has fallen from 34 months to 16 months.

“Since PDUFA, the review times for the drugs that are eventually banned have decreased enormously,” said study author Sidney Wolfe, MD, founder of Public Citizen’s Health Research Group and author of Worst Pills, Best Pills.

“These shorter review times, combined with increased FDA authority to require further studies after approval—rather than settling safety issues before approval—possibly contributes to the increased rate of withdrawals and black box warnings.”

The researchers noted that they could not determine with certainty whether PDUFA caused the increase in drug withdrawals and black box warnings. It’s possible that other factors caused or contributed to the decrease in safety observed in recent years.

Prescription drugs

Credit: CDC

The introduction of expedited drug approvals in the US coincides with an increase in black box warnings and market withdrawals, a new study shows.

The researchers could not establish a causal link between the events, but they still believe physicians and patients should exercise caution when considering the use of drugs approved since 1992.

That’s when Congress passed a law allowing the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to collect fees to expedite drug approvals.

The researchers found that drugs approved after the law—the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA)—was enacted were significantly more likely than previously approved drugs to acquire a black box warning or be withdrawn for safety reasons.

“Our findings raise concern that the FDA is rushing its review of new drugs and allowing potentially unsafe medicines onto the market,” said Karen Lasser, MD, MPH, of Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center.

“As a primary care doctor, I’m wary of prescribing brand new drugs unless they’re really a breakthrough, since their full risks are often unknown. And patients should be wary too.”

Dr Lasser and her colleagues expressed this viewpoint and described the research supporting it in Health Affairs.

The researchers collected information on new molecular entities (active ingredients that have never before been marketed in the US in any form) approved by the FDA between 1975 and 2009.

Of these 748 drugs, 114 (15.2%) received one or more black box warnings, and 32 (4.3%) were withdrawn from the market for safety reasons.

Very few of the 32 withdrawn drugs had clearly unique benefits at the time of approval, but all had unique risks that eventually led to their withdrawal.

Half of all black box warnings appeared after a drug had been on the market for 12 years, and safety withdrawals have occurred as late as 30 years after a drug’s initial release.

Drugs approved after the enactment of PDUFA were significantly more likely to receive a black box warning or withdrawal than drugs approved before PDUFA’s enactment—26.7 out of 100 drugs vs 21.2 out of 100 drugs (P<0.05) at up to 16 years of follow-up.

Since the law was enacted, the average approval time for all drugs has fallen from 34 months to 16 months.

“Since PDUFA, the review times for the drugs that are eventually banned have decreased enormously,” said study author Sidney Wolfe, MD, founder of Public Citizen’s Health Research Group and author of Worst Pills, Best Pills.

“These shorter review times, combined with increased FDA authority to require further studies after approval—rather than settling safety issues before approval—possibly contributes to the increased rate of withdrawals and black box warnings.”

The researchers noted that they could not determine with certainty whether PDUFA caused the increase in drug withdrawals and black box warnings. It’s possible that other factors caused or contributed to the decrease in safety observed in recent years.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Expediting drug approvals may compromise safety
Display Headline
Expediting drug approvals may compromise safety
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica