Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/28/2018 - 10:48
Display Headline
Failed D&C follows missed abortion

Tulsa County (Okla) District Court

A 20-year-old woman presented to a hospital after suffering a missed abortion.

A resident, supervised by an Ob/Gyn, attempted to perform a dilation and curettage (D&C) procedure, but was unsuccessful in removing the fetus. Ten days later, the fetus was expelled from the patient’s body while she was at home. She subsequently underwent a second D&C.

In suing, the woman claimed she never consented to have a resident conduct the D&C. She also argued that the procedure was negligently performed.

The doctors maintained that the patient was told a resident would be involved. They further noted that not being able to remove the fetus is a known risk of the D&C procedure.

  • The jury returned a defense verdict.
The cases presented here were compiled by Lewis L. Laska, editor of Medical Malpractice Verdicts, Settlements & Experts. While there are instances when the available information is incomplete, these cases represent the types of clinical situations that typically result in litigation.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Issue
OBG Management - 15(12)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
62-65
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Article PDF
Article PDF

Tulsa County (Okla) District Court

A 20-year-old woman presented to a hospital after suffering a missed abortion.

A resident, supervised by an Ob/Gyn, attempted to perform a dilation and curettage (D&C) procedure, but was unsuccessful in removing the fetus. Ten days later, the fetus was expelled from the patient’s body while she was at home. She subsequently underwent a second D&C.

In suing, the woman claimed she never consented to have a resident conduct the D&C. She also argued that the procedure was negligently performed.

The doctors maintained that the patient was told a resident would be involved. They further noted that not being able to remove the fetus is a known risk of the D&C procedure.

  • The jury returned a defense verdict.
The cases presented here were compiled by Lewis L. Laska, editor of Medical Malpractice Verdicts, Settlements & Experts. While there are instances when the available information is incomplete, these cases represent the types of clinical situations that typically result in litigation.

Tulsa County (Okla) District Court

A 20-year-old woman presented to a hospital after suffering a missed abortion.

A resident, supervised by an Ob/Gyn, attempted to perform a dilation and curettage (D&C) procedure, but was unsuccessful in removing the fetus. Ten days later, the fetus was expelled from the patient’s body while she was at home. She subsequently underwent a second D&C.

In suing, the woman claimed she never consented to have a resident conduct the D&C. She also argued that the procedure was negligently performed.

The doctors maintained that the patient was told a resident would be involved. They further noted that not being able to remove the fetus is a known risk of the D&C procedure.

  • The jury returned a defense verdict.
The cases presented here were compiled by Lewis L. Laska, editor of Medical Malpractice Verdicts, Settlements & Experts. While there are instances when the available information is incomplete, these cases represent the types of clinical situations that typically result in litigation.
Issue
OBG Management - 15(12)
Issue
OBG Management - 15(12)
Page Number
62-65
Page Number
62-65
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Failed D&C follows missed abortion
Display Headline
Failed D&C follows missed abortion
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media