User login
Credit: FDA
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban (Savaysa) for use in two patient populations.
The anticoagulant is now approved to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and to treat venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients who have already received parenteral anticoagulation for 5 to 10 days.
The drug has been approved with a Boxed Warning.
The warning states that edoxaban is less effective in NVAF patients with a creatinine clearance greater than 95 mL/min. Patients with creatinine clearance above this limit have an increased risk of stroke if they receive edoxaban (compared to the risk with warfarin), so these patients should not receive edoxaban.
The warning also states that premature discontinuation of edoxaban increases the risk of stroke. Furthermore, spinal or epidural hematomas may occur in patients on edoxaban who are receiving anesthesia injected around the spine or undergoing spinal puncture.
Edoxaban for VTE
In the Hokusai-VTE trial, researchers evaluated edoxaban in 4921 patients with deep vein thrombosis and 3319 with pulmonary embolism. Patients received initial treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin and were then randomized to receive edoxaban or warfarin daily for 3 to 12 months.
Overall, edoxaban proved as effective as warfarin. Recurrent, symptomatic VTE occurred in 3.2% and 3.5% of patients, respectively (P<0.001 for non-inferiority).
Edoxaban proved superior when it came to the primary safety outcome. Clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 8.5% of edoxaban-treated patients and 10.3% of warfarin-treated patients (P=0.004 for superiority).
In the edoxaban arm, there were 2 fatal bleeds and 13 non-fatal bleeds in a critical site. With warfarin, there were 10 fatal bleeds and 25 non-fatal bleeds in a critical site.
Edoxaban in NVAF
In the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, researchers compared edoxaban and warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolic events (SEE) in patients with NVAF.
The trial included 21,105 patients who were randomized to receive warfarin (n=7036), edoxaban at 60 mg (n=7035), or edoxaban at 30 mg (n=7034).
Edoxaban was at least non-inferior to warfarin with regard to efficacy. The annual incidence of stroke or SEE was 1.50% with warfarin, 1.18% with edoxaban at 60 mg (P<0.001 for non-inferiority), and 1.61% with edoxaban at 30 mg (P=0.005 for non-inferiority).
Annualized rates for the secondary composite endpoint of stroke, SEE, and cardiovascular death were 4.43% with warfarin, 3.85% with edoxaban at 60 mg (P=0.005), and 4.23% with edoxaban at 30 mg (P=0.32).
In addition, edoxaban was associated with a significantly lower rate of major and fatal bleeding. The annual incidence of major bleeding was 3.43% with warfarin, 2.75% with edoxaban at 60 mg (P<0.001), and 1.61% with edoxaban at 30 mg (P<0.001).
Fatal bleeds occurred at an annual rate of 0.38% with warfarin, 0.21% with edoxaban at 60 mg (P=0.006), and 0.13% with edoxaban at 30 mg (P<0.001).
Edoxaban is under development by Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. 
Credit: FDA
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban (Savaysa) for use in two patient populations.
The anticoagulant is now approved to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and to treat venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients who have already received parenteral anticoagulation for 5 to 10 days.
The drug has been approved with a Boxed Warning.
The warning states that edoxaban is less effective in NVAF patients with a creatinine clearance greater than 95 mL/min. Patients with creatinine clearance above this limit have an increased risk of stroke if they receive edoxaban (compared to the risk with warfarin), so these patients should not receive edoxaban.
The warning also states that premature discontinuation of edoxaban increases the risk of stroke. Furthermore, spinal or epidural hematomas may occur in patients on edoxaban who are receiving anesthesia injected around the spine or undergoing spinal puncture.
Edoxaban for VTE
In the Hokusai-VTE trial, researchers evaluated edoxaban in 4921 patients with deep vein thrombosis and 3319 with pulmonary embolism. Patients received initial treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin and were then randomized to receive edoxaban or warfarin daily for 3 to 12 months.
Overall, edoxaban proved as effective as warfarin. Recurrent, symptomatic VTE occurred in 3.2% and 3.5% of patients, respectively (P<0.001 for non-inferiority).
Edoxaban proved superior when it came to the primary safety outcome. Clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 8.5% of edoxaban-treated patients and 10.3% of warfarin-treated patients (P=0.004 for superiority).
In the edoxaban arm, there were 2 fatal bleeds and 13 non-fatal bleeds in a critical site. With warfarin, there were 10 fatal bleeds and 25 non-fatal bleeds in a critical site.
Edoxaban in NVAF
In the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, researchers compared edoxaban and warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolic events (SEE) in patients with NVAF.
The trial included 21,105 patients who were randomized to receive warfarin (n=7036), edoxaban at 60 mg (n=7035), or edoxaban at 30 mg (n=7034).
Edoxaban was at least non-inferior to warfarin with regard to efficacy. The annual incidence of stroke or SEE was 1.50% with warfarin, 1.18% with edoxaban at 60 mg (P<0.001 for non-inferiority), and 1.61% with edoxaban at 30 mg (P=0.005 for non-inferiority).
Annualized rates for the secondary composite endpoint of stroke, SEE, and cardiovascular death were 4.43% with warfarin, 3.85% with edoxaban at 60 mg (P=0.005), and 4.23% with edoxaban at 30 mg (P=0.32).
In addition, edoxaban was associated with a significantly lower rate of major and fatal bleeding. The annual incidence of major bleeding was 3.43% with warfarin, 2.75% with edoxaban at 60 mg (P<0.001), and 1.61% with edoxaban at 30 mg (P<0.001).
Fatal bleeds occurred at an annual rate of 0.38% with warfarin, 0.21% with edoxaban at 60 mg (P=0.006), and 0.13% with edoxaban at 30 mg (P<0.001).
Edoxaban is under development by Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.
Credit: FDA
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban (Savaysa) for use in two patient populations.
The anticoagulant is now approved to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and to treat venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients who have already received parenteral anticoagulation for 5 to 10 days.
The drug has been approved with a Boxed Warning.
The warning states that edoxaban is less effective in NVAF patients with a creatinine clearance greater than 95 mL/min. Patients with creatinine clearance above this limit have an increased risk of stroke if they receive edoxaban (compared to the risk with warfarin), so these patients should not receive edoxaban.
The warning also states that premature discontinuation of edoxaban increases the risk of stroke. Furthermore, spinal or epidural hematomas may occur in patients on edoxaban who are receiving anesthesia injected around the spine or undergoing spinal puncture.
Edoxaban for VTE
In the Hokusai-VTE trial, researchers evaluated edoxaban in 4921 patients with deep vein thrombosis and 3319 with pulmonary embolism. Patients received initial treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin and were then randomized to receive edoxaban or warfarin daily for 3 to 12 months.
Overall, edoxaban proved as effective as warfarin. Recurrent, symptomatic VTE occurred in 3.2% and 3.5% of patients, respectively (P<0.001 for non-inferiority).
Edoxaban proved superior when it came to the primary safety outcome. Clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 8.5% of edoxaban-treated patients and 10.3% of warfarin-treated patients (P=0.004 for superiority).
In the edoxaban arm, there were 2 fatal bleeds and 13 non-fatal bleeds in a critical site. With warfarin, there were 10 fatal bleeds and 25 non-fatal bleeds in a critical site.
Edoxaban in NVAF
In the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, researchers compared edoxaban and warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolic events (SEE) in patients with NVAF.
The trial included 21,105 patients who were randomized to receive warfarin (n=7036), edoxaban at 60 mg (n=7035), or edoxaban at 30 mg (n=7034).
Edoxaban was at least non-inferior to warfarin with regard to efficacy. The annual incidence of stroke or SEE was 1.50% with warfarin, 1.18% with edoxaban at 60 mg (P<0.001 for non-inferiority), and 1.61% with edoxaban at 30 mg (P=0.005 for non-inferiority).
Annualized rates for the secondary composite endpoint of stroke, SEE, and cardiovascular death were 4.43% with warfarin, 3.85% with edoxaban at 60 mg (P=0.005), and 4.23% with edoxaban at 30 mg (P=0.32).
In addition, edoxaban was associated with a significantly lower rate of major and fatal bleeding. The annual incidence of major bleeding was 3.43% with warfarin, 2.75% with edoxaban at 60 mg (P<0.001), and 1.61% with edoxaban at 30 mg (P<0.001).
Fatal bleeds occurred at an annual rate of 0.38% with warfarin, 0.21% with edoxaban at 60 mg (P=0.006), and 0.13% with edoxaban at 30 mg (P<0.001).
Edoxaban is under development by Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.