User login
A 42-year-old woman with a 4×6 cm mass on her left ovary was given hormone suppression therapy and told to return in a month. She did not return for a year, at which time the mass was found to have enlarged to 9×11 cm and surgery was recommended.
Because of adhesions, a laparotomy was performed. The next day the woman complained of back pain, and it was discovered that a ureter had been cut. The woman underwent surgery to repair the ureter.
In suing, the woman asserted the physician was negligent in failing to protect the ureter from injury during the laparotomy. She claimed she had back pain, chronic depression, loss of bladder control, and disfigurement as a result of the injury.
The physician contended the ureter was injured during clamping of deep pelvic blood vessels to control bleeding and that the ureter had been visualized as intact prior to closure. The physician also claimed negligence on the part of the woman, for failing to return for a follow-up examination when recommended, leading to the growth of the mass, which complicated the surgery.
- The jury returned a defense verdict.
A 42-year-old woman with a 4×6 cm mass on her left ovary was given hormone suppression therapy and told to return in a month. She did not return for a year, at which time the mass was found to have enlarged to 9×11 cm and surgery was recommended.
Because of adhesions, a laparotomy was performed. The next day the woman complained of back pain, and it was discovered that a ureter had been cut. The woman underwent surgery to repair the ureter.
In suing, the woman asserted the physician was negligent in failing to protect the ureter from injury during the laparotomy. She claimed she had back pain, chronic depression, loss of bladder control, and disfigurement as a result of the injury.
The physician contended the ureter was injured during clamping of deep pelvic blood vessels to control bleeding and that the ureter had been visualized as intact prior to closure. The physician also claimed negligence on the part of the woman, for failing to return for a follow-up examination when recommended, leading to the growth of the mass, which complicated the surgery.
- The jury returned a defense verdict.
A 42-year-old woman with a 4×6 cm mass on her left ovary was given hormone suppression therapy and told to return in a month. She did not return for a year, at which time the mass was found to have enlarged to 9×11 cm and surgery was recommended.
Because of adhesions, a laparotomy was performed. The next day the woman complained of back pain, and it was discovered that a ureter had been cut. The woman underwent surgery to repair the ureter.
In suing, the woman asserted the physician was negligent in failing to protect the ureter from injury during the laparotomy. She claimed she had back pain, chronic depression, loss of bladder control, and disfigurement as a result of the injury.
The physician contended the ureter was injured during clamping of deep pelvic blood vessels to control bleeding and that the ureter had been visualized as intact prior to closure. The physician also claimed negligence on the part of the woman, for failing to return for a follow-up examination when recommended, leading to the growth of the mass, which complicated the surgery.
- The jury returned a defense verdict.