Lower Recurrence Rate for HCC Treated With Resection Than Radiofrequency Ablation

Although percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection for small hepatocellular carcinomas have similar survival rates, ablation patients have a higher rate of cancer recurrence, compared with surgical resection patients, reported Dr. Hung-Hsu Hung and colleagues in the January issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Dr. Hung, of Taipei (Taiwan) Veterans General Hospital and the National Yang-Ming University, also in Taipei, looked at 419 consecutive patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or surgical resection (SR) at the hospital in 2002-2007. All patients had no more than three small (5 cm or less) liver tumors without extrahepatic metastasis (Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2011 January [doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2010.08.018]).

In all, 190 patients underwent RFA and the remaining 229 underwent SR to treat their liver cancer. Patients who chose SR were on average slightly younger (60 years vs. 67 years; P less than .001). This was expected, given the invasive nature of the surgery.

Additionally, the authors found that there was a higher proportion of patients with chronic hepatitis B in the SR group than in the RFA group (59.8% vs. 46.3%; P = .004), whereas chronic hepatitis C was more common in the RFA group (44.7% vs. 26.6%; P less than .001).

This was also an expected finding, because in chronic HBV infection, hepatocellular carcinomas tend to occur at a younger age, the researchers wrote.

Regarding survival, 83 patients had died after a median follow-up of more than 42 months. "Among the 190 patients [who] underwent RFA, 41 (21.6%) died during the follow-up period; 97 (51.1%) were alive with regular visits" until Jan. 31, 2010, and the remaining 52 (27.4%) were lost to follow-up sometime before 2010.

In comparison, there were 42 deaths (18.3%) among the SR group, with 120 patients known to be alive through Jan. 31, 2010 (52.4%), and the remaining 67 patients (29.3%) lost to follow-up.

"The cumulative overall survival rates at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 97.3%, 92.2%, 88.2%, and 79.3% in the SR group and 96.6%, 86.7%, 77.3%, and 67.4% in the RFA group, respectively," a significant difference in univariate analysis (P less than 0.009), wrote the authors.

However, after controlling for the older age and comorbidities of the RFA group in multivariate analysis, the authors found that RFA was not an independent risk factor associated with poor survival.

Next, the authors looked at factors associated with cancer recurrence. Overall, 244 patients had experienced tumor recurrence at a median of 14.5 months following RFA or SR.

"The cumulative recurrence rates at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 17.4%, 30.5%, 43.9%, and 59.1% in the SR group and 37.4%, 54.1%, 71.0%, and 79.5% in the RFA group, respectively (P less than .001)," they reported.

As with survival, that translated to a significantly higher univariate risk of recurrence among RFA patients (hazard ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.58-2.65). When assessed in a multivariate analysis, RFA was still significantly associated with cancer recurrence (HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.48-2.57; P less than .001).

The finding of equal survival but greater recurrence among RFA patients persisted in a third propensity analysis, which employed nearest-neighbor one-to-one matching of 84 patients in each group in terms of age, sex, tumor size, tumor number, platelet counts, hepatitis status, and several other parameters.

The only subgroup for which RFA was equal to SR in terms of both survival and tumor recurrence was patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma less than 2 cm in size, known as "very early small HCC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0)" tumors.

According to the authors, their study "highlights the importance of close surveillance after local ablation therapy." Additionally, the authors concluded that RFA may be a good alternative to surgical resection for BCLC stage 0 HCC, although prospective study is needed.

Dr. Hung and colleagues disclosed no conflicts of interest related to this study.

Although percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection for small hepatocellular carcinomas have similar survival rates, ablation patients have a higher rate of cancer recurrence, compared with surgical resection patients, reported Dr. Hung-Hsu Hung and colleagues in the January issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Dr. Hung, of Taipei (Taiwan) Veterans General Hospital and the National Yang-Ming University, also in Taipei, looked at 419 consecutive patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or surgical resection (SR) at the hospital in 2002-2007. All patients had no more than three small (5 cm or less) liver tumors without extrahepatic metastasis (Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2011 January [doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2010.08.018]).

In all, 190 patients underwent RFA and the remaining 229 underwent SR to treat their liver cancer. Patients who chose SR were on average slightly younger (60 years vs. 67 years; P less than .001). This was expected, given the invasive nature of the surgery.

Additionally, the authors found that there was a higher proportion of patients with chronic hepatitis B in the SR group than in the RFA group (59.8% vs. 46.3%; P = .004), whereas chronic hepatitis C was more common in the RFA group (44.7% vs. 26.6%; P less than .001).

This was also an expected finding, because in chronic HBV infection, hepatocellular carcinomas tend to occur at a younger age, the researchers wrote.

Regarding survival, 83 patients had died after a median follow-up of more than 42 months. "Among the 190 patients [who] underwent RFA, 41 (21.6%) died during the follow-up period; 97 (51.1%) were alive with regular visits" until Jan. 31, 2010, and the remaining 52 (27.4%) were lost to follow-up sometime before 2010.

In comparison, there were 42 deaths (18.3%) among the SR group, with 120 patients known to be alive through Jan. 31, 2010 (52.4%), and the remaining 67 patients (29.3%) lost to follow-up.

"The cumulative overall survival rates at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 97.3%, 92.2%, 88.2%, and 79.3% in the SR group and 96.6%, 86.7%, 77.3%, and 67.4% in the RFA group, respectively," a significant difference in univariate analysis (P less than 0.009), wrote the authors.

However, after controlling for the older age and comorbidities of the RFA group in multivariate analysis, the authors found that RFA was not an independent risk factor associated with poor survival.

Next, the authors looked at factors associated with cancer recurrence. Overall, 244 patients had experienced tumor recurrence at a median of 14.5 months following RFA or SR.

"The cumulative recurrence rates at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 17.4%, 30.5%, 43.9%, and 59.1% in the SR group and 37.4%, 54.1%, 71.0%, and 79.5% in the RFA group, respectively (P less than .001)," they reported.

As with survival, that translated to a significantly higher univariate risk of recurrence among RFA patients (hazard ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.58-2.65). When assessed in a multivariate analysis, RFA was still significantly associated with cancer recurrence (HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.48-2.57; P less than .001).

The finding of equal survival but greater recurrence among RFA patients persisted in a third propensity analysis, which employed nearest-neighbor one-to-one matching of 84 patients in each group in terms of age, sex, tumor size, tumor number, platelet counts, hepatitis status, and several other parameters.

The only subgroup for which RFA was equal to SR in terms of both survival and tumor recurrence was patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma less than 2 cm in size, known as "very early small HCC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0)" tumors.

According to the authors, their study "highlights the importance of close surveillance after local ablation therapy." Additionally, the authors concluded that RFA may be a good alternative to surgical resection for BCLC stage 0 HCC, although prospective study is needed.

Dr. Hung and colleagues disclosed no conflicts of interest related to this study.

Although percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection for small hepatocellular carcinomas have similar survival rates, ablation patients have a higher rate of cancer recurrence, compared with surgical resection patients, reported Dr. Hung-Hsu Hung and colleagues in the January issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Dr. Hung, of Taipei (Taiwan) Veterans General Hospital and the National Yang-Ming University, also in Taipei, looked at 419 consecutive patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or surgical resection (SR) at the hospital in 2002-2007. All patients had no more than three small (5 cm or less) liver tumors without extrahepatic metastasis (Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2011 January [doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2010.08.018]).

In all, 190 patients underwent RFA and the remaining 229 underwent SR to treat their liver cancer. Patients who chose SR were on average slightly younger (60 years vs. 67 years; P less than .001). This was expected, given the invasive nature of the surgery.

Additionally, the authors found that there was a higher proportion of patients with chronic hepatitis B in the SR group than in the RFA group (59.8% vs. 46.3%; P = .004), whereas chronic hepatitis C was more common in the RFA group (44.7% vs. 26.6%; P less than .001).

This was also an expected finding, because in chronic HBV infection, hepatocellular carcinomas tend to occur at a younger age, the researchers wrote.

Regarding survival, 83 patients had died after a median follow-up of more than 42 months. "Among the 190 patients [who] underwent RFA, 41 (21.6%) died during the follow-up period; 97 (51.1%) were alive with regular visits" until Jan. 31, 2010, and the remaining 52 (27.4%) were lost to follow-up sometime before 2010.

In comparison, there were 42 deaths (18.3%) among the SR group, with 120 patients known to be alive through Jan. 31, 2010 (52.4%), and the remaining 67 patients (29.3%) lost to follow-up.

"The cumulative overall survival rates at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 97.3%, 92.2%, 88.2%, and 79.3% in the SR group and 96.6%, 86.7%, 77.3%, and 67.4% in the RFA group, respectively," a significant difference in univariate analysis (P less than 0.009), wrote the authors.

However, after controlling for the older age and comorbidities of the RFA group in multivariate analysis, the authors found that RFA was not an independent risk factor associated with poor survival.

Next, the authors looked at factors associated with cancer recurrence. Overall, 244 patients had experienced tumor recurrence at a median of 14.5 months following RFA or SR.

"The cumulative recurrence rates at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 17.4%, 30.5%, 43.9%, and 59.1% in the SR group and 37.4%, 54.1%, 71.0%, and 79.5% in the RFA group, respectively (P less than .001)," they reported.

As with survival, that translated to a significantly higher univariate risk of recurrence among RFA patients (hazard ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.58-2.65). When assessed in a multivariate analysis, RFA was still significantly associated with cancer recurrence (HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.48-2.57; P less than .001).

The finding of equal survival but greater recurrence among RFA patients persisted in a third propensity analysis, which employed nearest-neighbor one-to-one matching of 84 patients in each group in terms of age, sex, tumor size, tumor number, platelet counts, hepatitis status, and several other parameters.

The only subgroup for which RFA was equal to SR in terms of both survival and tumor recurrence was patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma less than 2 cm in size, known as "very early small HCC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0)" tumors.

According to the authors, their study "highlights the importance of close surveillance after local ablation therapy." Additionally, the authors concluded that RFA may be a good alternative to surgical resection for BCLC stage 0 HCC, although prospective study is needed.

Dr. Hung and colleagues disclosed no conflicts of interest related to this study.