User login
Key clinical point: Capecitabine-based chemotherapy improved prognostic outcomes in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
Major finding: Capecitabine-based chemotherapy vs capecitabine-free regimens improved disease-free survival (DFS; hazard ratio [HR] 0.81; P < .001) and overall survival (HR 0.75; P < .001) outcomes. DFS benefits were particularly observed in the adjuvant setting (HR 0.79; P < .001) and in the subgroup of patients with lymph node-negative TNBC (HR 0.68; P = .006) and in those who received capecitabine for ≥ 6 cycles (HR 0.71; P < .001).
Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials including 5390 patients with TNBC who were treated with capecitabine-based chemotherapy or capecitabine-free regimens.
Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Source: Bai J et al. Capecitabine-based chemotherapy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: A meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1245650 (Oct 25). doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1245650
Key clinical point: Capecitabine-based chemotherapy improved prognostic outcomes in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
Major finding: Capecitabine-based chemotherapy vs capecitabine-free regimens improved disease-free survival (DFS; hazard ratio [HR] 0.81; P < .001) and overall survival (HR 0.75; P < .001) outcomes. DFS benefits were particularly observed in the adjuvant setting (HR 0.79; P < .001) and in the subgroup of patients with lymph node-negative TNBC (HR 0.68; P = .006) and in those who received capecitabine for ≥ 6 cycles (HR 0.71; P < .001).
Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials including 5390 patients with TNBC who were treated with capecitabine-based chemotherapy or capecitabine-free regimens.
Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Source: Bai J et al. Capecitabine-based chemotherapy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: A meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1245650 (Oct 25). doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1245650
Key clinical point: Capecitabine-based chemotherapy improved prognostic outcomes in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
Major finding: Capecitabine-based chemotherapy vs capecitabine-free regimens improved disease-free survival (DFS; hazard ratio [HR] 0.81; P < .001) and overall survival (HR 0.75; P < .001) outcomes. DFS benefits were particularly observed in the adjuvant setting (HR 0.79; P < .001) and in the subgroup of patients with lymph node-negative TNBC (HR 0.68; P = .006) and in those who received capecitabine for ≥ 6 cycles (HR 0.71; P < .001).
Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials including 5390 patients with TNBC who were treated with capecitabine-based chemotherapy or capecitabine-free regimens.
Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Source: Bai J et al. Capecitabine-based chemotherapy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: A meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1245650 (Oct 25). doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1245650