NSAIDs effective and safe for axSpA in the short term

The findings of a recent Cochrane review back up guidelines that recommend NSAIDs as an appropriate first-line treatment for people with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

NSAIDs have been associated with a variety of gastrointestinal effects and an increased risk of cardiovascular events, heart failure, and renal toxicity, an international team of researchers led by Dr. Féline P.B. Kroon of the Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands noted in the review, published in the Journal of Rheumatology.

Denise Fulton/Frontline Medical News

“It is therefore crucial to know whether the benefits offset the risks, especially because the therapy is often given for extended periods of time,” the researchers wrote in background information to the article (J Rheumatol. 2016. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.150721).

The investigators analyzed the evidence to assess the benefits and harms of NSAIDs in controlling symptoms, disease activity, and radiographic progression in patients with axSpA.

Reviewing 29 randomized, controlled trials and two “quasi” RCT studies in a pooled analyses, the research team found that, compared with placebo, both traditional and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) NSAIDs were consistently more efficacious at 6 weeks and equally safe after 12 weeks.

The researchers also observed no significant differences in benefits or harms between the two NSAID classes. An increased number of neurologic events were initially observed for indomethacin, but the finding was not statistically significant when studies with high or unclear risk of bias were excluded.

Two single studies included in the review also suggested NSAIDs might retard radiographic progression in the spine in axSpA, especially in certain subgroups of patients such as those with high C-reactive protein. Although this would most likely be best achieved by continuous rather than on-demand use, the researchers said.

“The results of the review are in keeping with current recommendations that NSAIDs are appropriate first-line treatments of patients with axSpA with active disease before tumor necrosis factor inhibitor biologicals are applied,” they concluded.

However, they said it was surprising that they were unable to confirm the safety concerns associated with traditional NSAIDs and COX-2 NSAIDs.

This finding could mean that short-term use of either class of NSAID in this population of patients is not associated with an increased risk of GI or other adverse events.

But it could also be because most patients with ankylosing spondylitis are younger and have fewer comorbidities than patients with other rheumatic diseases.

The finding that people with ankylosing spondylitis have fewer adverse events with biologics, compared with patients with other rheumatic diseases, supported this theory, they said.

“It is technically still possible that lack of statistical power is at the basis of this, but we feel it is more likely that in the studied population and within the studied time frame (i.e., short-term), the risks of GI or cardiovascular toxicity are really not increased,” they wrote.

The review had several limitations, including that many trials were older (61% of the included studies were published before 1990) and there were not sufficient data to draw conclusions on long-term safety.

The findings of a recent Cochrane review back up guidelines that recommend NSAIDs as an appropriate first-line treatment for people with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

NSAIDs have been associated with a variety of gastrointestinal effects and an increased risk of cardiovascular events, heart failure, and renal toxicity, an international team of researchers led by Dr. Féline P.B. Kroon of the Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands noted in the review, published in the Journal of Rheumatology.

Denise Fulton/Frontline Medical News

“It is therefore crucial to know whether the benefits offset the risks, especially because the therapy is often given for extended periods of time,” the researchers wrote in background information to the article (J Rheumatol. 2016. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.150721).

The investigators analyzed the evidence to assess the benefits and harms of NSAIDs in controlling symptoms, disease activity, and radiographic progression in patients with axSpA.

Reviewing 29 randomized, controlled trials and two “quasi” RCT studies in a pooled analyses, the research team found that, compared with placebo, both traditional and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) NSAIDs were consistently more efficacious at 6 weeks and equally safe after 12 weeks.

The researchers also observed no significant differences in benefits or harms between the two NSAID classes. An increased number of neurologic events were initially observed for indomethacin, but the finding was not statistically significant when studies with high or unclear risk of bias were excluded.

Two single studies included in the review also suggested NSAIDs might retard radiographic progression in the spine in axSpA, especially in certain subgroups of patients such as those with high C-reactive protein. Although this would most likely be best achieved by continuous rather than on-demand use, the researchers said.

“The results of the review are in keeping with current recommendations that NSAIDs are appropriate first-line treatments of patients with axSpA with active disease before tumor necrosis factor inhibitor biologicals are applied,” they concluded.

However, they said it was surprising that they were unable to confirm the safety concerns associated with traditional NSAIDs and COX-2 NSAIDs.

This finding could mean that short-term use of either class of NSAID in this population of patients is not associated with an increased risk of GI or other adverse events.

But it could also be because most patients with ankylosing spondylitis are younger and have fewer comorbidities than patients with other rheumatic diseases.

The finding that people with ankylosing spondylitis have fewer adverse events with biologics, compared with patients with other rheumatic diseases, supported this theory, they said.

“It is technically still possible that lack of statistical power is at the basis of this, but we feel it is more likely that in the studied population and within the studied time frame (i.e., short-term), the risks of GI or cardiovascular toxicity are really not increased,” they wrote.

The review had several limitations, including that many trials were older (61% of the included studies were published before 1990) and there were not sufficient data to draw conclusions on long-term safety.

The findings of a recent Cochrane review back up guidelines that recommend NSAIDs as an appropriate first-line treatment for people with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

NSAIDs have been associated with a variety of gastrointestinal effects and an increased risk of cardiovascular events, heart failure, and renal toxicity, an international team of researchers led by Dr. Féline P.B. Kroon of the Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands noted in the review, published in the Journal of Rheumatology.

Denise Fulton/Frontline Medical News

“It is therefore crucial to know whether the benefits offset the risks, especially because the therapy is often given for extended periods of time,” the researchers wrote in background information to the article (J Rheumatol. 2016. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.150721).

The investigators analyzed the evidence to assess the benefits and harms of NSAIDs in controlling symptoms, disease activity, and radiographic progression in patients with axSpA.

Reviewing 29 randomized, controlled trials and two “quasi” RCT studies in a pooled analyses, the research team found that, compared with placebo, both traditional and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) NSAIDs were consistently more efficacious at 6 weeks and equally safe after 12 weeks.

The researchers also observed no significant differences in benefits or harms between the two NSAID classes. An increased number of neurologic events were initially observed for indomethacin, but the finding was not statistically significant when studies with high or unclear risk of bias were excluded.

Two single studies included in the review also suggested NSAIDs might retard radiographic progression in the spine in axSpA, especially in certain subgroups of patients such as those with high C-reactive protein. Although this would most likely be best achieved by continuous rather than on-demand use, the researchers said.

“The results of the review are in keeping with current recommendations that NSAIDs are appropriate first-line treatments of patients with axSpA with active disease before tumor necrosis factor inhibitor biologicals are applied,” they concluded.

However, they said it was surprising that they were unable to confirm the safety concerns associated with traditional NSAIDs and COX-2 NSAIDs.

This finding could mean that short-term use of either class of NSAID in this population of patients is not associated with an increased risk of GI or other adverse events.

But it could also be because most patients with ankylosing spondylitis are younger and have fewer comorbidities than patients with other rheumatic diseases.

The finding that people with ankylosing spondylitis have fewer adverse events with biologics, compared with patients with other rheumatic diseases, supported this theory, they said.

“It is technically still possible that lack of statistical power is at the basis of this, but we feel it is more likely that in the studied population and within the studied time frame (i.e., short-term), the risks of GI or cardiovascular toxicity are really not increased,” they wrote.

The review had several limitations, including that many trials were older (61% of the included studies were published before 1990) and there were not sufficient data to draw conclusions on long-term safety.