User login
ORLANDO – The rate at which physicians detect adenomas during colonoscopy is an independent risk factor for their patients’ risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy, according to findings from a large observational study.
Physicians with low rates of adenoma detection during screening colonoscopies were more likely to have patients who developed interval colorectal cancers. For every 1% decline in the physician adenoma detection rate, colorectal cancer risk increased by about 3%, and the risk of death related to colorectal cancer increased by about 4%, Dr. Douglas A. Corley reported at the annual Digestive Disease Week.
The findings suggest that adenoma detection rates – the proportion of screening colonoscopies in which a physician detects at least one adenoma – could be a useful quality metric, he said.
The findings were noted in a study of 314,872 colonoscopy exams in which 8,708 colorectal cancers were detected. Interval colorectal cancers – cancers diagnosed at examinations that took place at least 6 months after the index colonoscopy – were seen in 712 patients, said Dr. Corley, of the Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, Calif.
Most (60%) interval cancers were proximal. In total, 34% were advanced cancers, and about 20% led to colorectal cancer–related deaths. About one-third were diagnosed in the early interval period, between 6 months and 3 years. The remaining two-thirds were diagnosed 3-10 years after an initial negative screening colonoscopy, Dr. Corley said.
Physician adenoma detection rates ranged from 7% to 52%, which are rates consistent with prior reports in the literature. There was a linear association across five quintiles of physician adenoma detection rates and subsequent patient colorectal cancer risk. "There’s no threshold effect above which increases in adenoma detection rate were without benefit," Dr. Corley said.
After adjusting for colonoscopy indication and patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, family history of colorectal cancer, and Charlson comorbidity score, the risk was about 80%-90% higher among patients of physicians whose adenoma detection rates were in the first or second quintile, as compared with patients of physicians with detection rates in the highest quintile.
A similar pattern was seen for advanced colorectal cancers, and the correlation was even stronger. The risk was increased more than twofold among patients of physicians in the bottom two quintiles of adenoma detection rates, compared with patients whose physicians were in the top quintile, he said.
Risk of death from colorectal cancer followed a similar pattern. Patients of physicians in the first and second quintiles had more than a 2.5-fold increased risk of colorectal cancer death compared with patients of physicians in the top quintile. Risk did not differ by patient status or by cancer location, Dr. Corley said.
Patients included in the study were aged 50 years or older, had been members of the Kaiser Permanente Northern California health plan for at least 2 years, and had a negative colonoscopy for any indication between 1998 and 2010. Only those colonoscopies performed by experienced endoscopists – those who had performed more than 300 colonoscopies and more than 75 screening exams during the study period – were included in the study.
Patients were followed for 10 years or until another negative colonoscopy was performed, health plan membership was terminated, a diagnosis of colorectal cancer was made, or Jan. 31, 2011 – whichever came first.
Dr. Corley has received grant or research support from Pfizer Pharmaceuticals.
Physicians' individual adenoma detection rates were proposed as a quality metric for colonoscopy some time ago by the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and while that proposal made a great deal of sense from a clinical perspective, few supportive data existed, according to Dr. Linda Rabeneck.
Dr. Corley's finding that physician adenoma detection rates are an independent risk factor for patient colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy, confirm findings from a Polish study published in 2010 in the New England Journal of Medicine (N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;362:1795-803), and provide the first large-scale U.S. evidence to support that proposal, Dr. Rabeneck said in an interview.
"This really is further evidence that the risk of subsequent colorectal cancer is associated with the adenoma detection rate," she said.
However, Dr. Corley's intriguing finding that there appears to be no threshold above which there is no further benefit, raises some interesting questions for future study - namely, where the bar should be set. The task force proposed a threshold rate of 25% for male patients, and 15% for women, but based on these findings it appears these rates are too low.
"What should they be for a person undergoing their first colonoscopy screening? I think some further work is needed to refine this. But this is an important study to move us forward. I don't think anybody in the field would disagree now that adenoma detection rate should be a quality measure for colonoscopy. We now have strong evidence from a large study by a well-known group of investigators to underpin this," she said.
"It's a fine study. The investigators are to be congratulated."
Physicians' individual adenoma detection rates were proposed as a quality metric for colonoscopy some time ago by the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and while that proposal made a great deal of sense from a clinical perspective, few supportive data existed, according to Dr. Linda Rabeneck.
Dr. Corley's finding that physician adenoma detection rates are an independent risk factor for patient colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy, confirm findings from a Polish study published in 2010 in the New England Journal of Medicine (N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;362:1795-803), and provide the first large-scale U.S. evidence to support that proposal, Dr. Rabeneck said in an interview.
"This really is further evidence that the risk of subsequent colorectal cancer is associated with the adenoma detection rate," she said.
However, Dr. Corley's intriguing finding that there appears to be no threshold above which there is no further benefit, raises some interesting questions for future study - namely, where the bar should be set. The task force proposed a threshold rate of 25% for male patients, and 15% for women, but based on these findings it appears these rates are too low.
"What should they be for a person undergoing their first colonoscopy screening? I think some further work is needed to refine this. But this is an important study to move us forward. I don't think anybody in the field would disagree now that adenoma detection rate should be a quality measure for colonoscopy. We now have strong evidence from a large study by a well-known group of investigators to underpin this," she said.
"It's a fine study. The investigators are to be congratulated."
Physicians' individual adenoma detection rates were proposed as a quality metric for colonoscopy some time ago by the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and while that proposal made a great deal of sense from a clinical perspective, few supportive data existed, according to Dr. Linda Rabeneck.
Dr. Corley's finding that physician adenoma detection rates are an independent risk factor for patient colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy, confirm findings from a Polish study published in 2010 in the New England Journal of Medicine (N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;362:1795-803), and provide the first large-scale U.S. evidence to support that proposal, Dr. Rabeneck said in an interview.
"This really is further evidence that the risk of subsequent colorectal cancer is associated with the adenoma detection rate," she said.
However, Dr. Corley's intriguing finding that there appears to be no threshold above which there is no further benefit, raises some interesting questions for future study - namely, where the bar should be set. The task force proposed a threshold rate of 25% for male patients, and 15% for women, but based on these findings it appears these rates are too low.
"What should they be for a person undergoing their first colonoscopy screening? I think some further work is needed to refine this. But this is an important study to move us forward. I don't think anybody in the field would disagree now that adenoma detection rate should be a quality measure for colonoscopy. We now have strong evidence from a large study by a well-known group of investigators to underpin this," she said.
"It's a fine study. The investigators are to be congratulated."
ORLANDO – The rate at which physicians detect adenomas during colonoscopy is an independent risk factor for their patients’ risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy, according to findings from a large observational study.
Physicians with low rates of adenoma detection during screening colonoscopies were more likely to have patients who developed interval colorectal cancers. For every 1% decline in the physician adenoma detection rate, colorectal cancer risk increased by about 3%, and the risk of death related to colorectal cancer increased by about 4%, Dr. Douglas A. Corley reported at the annual Digestive Disease Week.
The findings suggest that adenoma detection rates – the proportion of screening colonoscopies in which a physician detects at least one adenoma – could be a useful quality metric, he said.
The findings were noted in a study of 314,872 colonoscopy exams in which 8,708 colorectal cancers were detected. Interval colorectal cancers – cancers diagnosed at examinations that took place at least 6 months after the index colonoscopy – were seen in 712 patients, said Dr. Corley, of the Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, Calif.
Most (60%) interval cancers were proximal. In total, 34% were advanced cancers, and about 20% led to colorectal cancer–related deaths. About one-third were diagnosed in the early interval period, between 6 months and 3 years. The remaining two-thirds were diagnosed 3-10 years after an initial negative screening colonoscopy, Dr. Corley said.
Physician adenoma detection rates ranged from 7% to 52%, which are rates consistent with prior reports in the literature. There was a linear association across five quintiles of physician adenoma detection rates and subsequent patient colorectal cancer risk. "There’s no threshold effect above which increases in adenoma detection rate were without benefit," Dr. Corley said.
After adjusting for colonoscopy indication and patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, family history of colorectal cancer, and Charlson comorbidity score, the risk was about 80%-90% higher among patients of physicians whose adenoma detection rates were in the first or second quintile, as compared with patients of physicians with detection rates in the highest quintile.
A similar pattern was seen for advanced colorectal cancers, and the correlation was even stronger. The risk was increased more than twofold among patients of physicians in the bottom two quintiles of adenoma detection rates, compared with patients whose physicians were in the top quintile, he said.
Risk of death from colorectal cancer followed a similar pattern. Patients of physicians in the first and second quintiles had more than a 2.5-fold increased risk of colorectal cancer death compared with patients of physicians in the top quintile. Risk did not differ by patient status or by cancer location, Dr. Corley said.
Patients included in the study were aged 50 years or older, had been members of the Kaiser Permanente Northern California health plan for at least 2 years, and had a negative colonoscopy for any indication between 1998 and 2010. Only those colonoscopies performed by experienced endoscopists – those who had performed more than 300 colonoscopies and more than 75 screening exams during the study period – were included in the study.
Patients were followed for 10 years or until another negative colonoscopy was performed, health plan membership was terminated, a diagnosis of colorectal cancer was made, or Jan. 31, 2011 – whichever came first.
Dr. Corley has received grant or research support from Pfizer Pharmaceuticals.
ORLANDO – The rate at which physicians detect adenomas during colonoscopy is an independent risk factor for their patients’ risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy, according to findings from a large observational study.
Physicians with low rates of adenoma detection during screening colonoscopies were more likely to have patients who developed interval colorectal cancers. For every 1% decline in the physician adenoma detection rate, colorectal cancer risk increased by about 3%, and the risk of death related to colorectal cancer increased by about 4%, Dr. Douglas A. Corley reported at the annual Digestive Disease Week.
The findings suggest that adenoma detection rates – the proportion of screening colonoscopies in which a physician detects at least one adenoma – could be a useful quality metric, he said.
The findings were noted in a study of 314,872 colonoscopy exams in which 8,708 colorectal cancers were detected. Interval colorectal cancers – cancers diagnosed at examinations that took place at least 6 months after the index colonoscopy – were seen in 712 patients, said Dr. Corley, of the Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, Calif.
Most (60%) interval cancers were proximal. In total, 34% were advanced cancers, and about 20% led to colorectal cancer–related deaths. About one-third were diagnosed in the early interval period, between 6 months and 3 years. The remaining two-thirds were diagnosed 3-10 years after an initial negative screening colonoscopy, Dr. Corley said.
Physician adenoma detection rates ranged from 7% to 52%, which are rates consistent with prior reports in the literature. There was a linear association across five quintiles of physician adenoma detection rates and subsequent patient colorectal cancer risk. "There’s no threshold effect above which increases in adenoma detection rate were without benefit," Dr. Corley said.
After adjusting for colonoscopy indication and patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, family history of colorectal cancer, and Charlson comorbidity score, the risk was about 80%-90% higher among patients of physicians whose adenoma detection rates were in the first or second quintile, as compared with patients of physicians with detection rates in the highest quintile.
A similar pattern was seen for advanced colorectal cancers, and the correlation was even stronger. The risk was increased more than twofold among patients of physicians in the bottom two quintiles of adenoma detection rates, compared with patients whose physicians were in the top quintile, he said.
Risk of death from colorectal cancer followed a similar pattern. Patients of physicians in the first and second quintiles had more than a 2.5-fold increased risk of colorectal cancer death compared with patients of physicians in the top quintile. Risk did not differ by patient status or by cancer location, Dr. Corley said.
Patients included in the study were aged 50 years or older, had been members of the Kaiser Permanente Northern California health plan for at least 2 years, and had a negative colonoscopy for any indication between 1998 and 2010. Only those colonoscopies performed by experienced endoscopists – those who had performed more than 300 colonoscopies and more than 75 screening exams during the study period – were included in the study.
Patients were followed for 10 years or until another negative colonoscopy was performed, health plan membership was terminated, a diagnosis of colorectal cancer was made, or Jan. 31, 2011 – whichever came first.
Dr. Corley has received grant or research support from Pfizer Pharmaceuticals.
AT DDW 2013
Major finding: For every 1% decline in the physician adenoma detection rate, colorectal cancer risk increased by about 3%, and the risk of death related to colorectal cancer increased by about 4%.
Data source: An observational study of 314,872 colonoscopies in which 8,708 interval colorectal cancers occurred.
Disclosures: Dr. Corley has received grant or research support from Pfizer Pharmaceuticals.