User login
A new study indicates that early screening can reduce the risk of death from breast cancer among female survivors of childhood Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) who received chest radiation.
Researchers found evidence to suggest that starting mammograms at age 25 can reduce the risk of breast cancer death among these patients, but using MRI can reduce the risk further.
Unfortunately, both methods come with a risk of false-positive results.
David Hodgson, MD, of the University of Toronto in Canada, and his colleagues reported these findings in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
Dr Hodgson estimates there are thousands of HL survivors in North America treated throughout the 1990s and later who received chest radiation and are unaware they are at risk of breast cancer and eligible for early screening.
“Many of these are women who received radiotherapy to more normal tissue or at higher doses than are used currently,” he said. “But even for more recently treated patients, screening should reduce the risk of breast cancer death.”
For this study, Dr Hodgson and his colleagues gathered published information from dozens of studies about the risk of developing breast cancer in childhood HL survivors, the accuracy of different forms of breast cancer screening, and the rates at which women agree to be screened when asked.
Using mathematical models, the researchers used these data to quantify the effectiveness of starting screening early—at age 25.
The team found that, using mammography, about 260 survivors of childhood HL would need to be invited to have early breast cancer screening to prevent 1 breast cancer death.
However, the use of MRI for screening improved the effectiveness considerably. It reduced the number of women needing screening to prevent 1 breast cancer death to less than 80.
For HL survivors treated at age 15, the absolute risk of breast cancer mortality by age 75 was predicted to decrease from 16.65% with no early screening to 16.28% with annual mammography, 15.40% with annual MRI, 15.38% with same-day annual mammography and MRI, and 15.37% with alternating mammography and MRI every 6 months.
Dr Hodgson cautioned that there is a risk of false-positive screening results, particuarly with MRI, given that the method can detect many changes in breast tissue, most of which are not cancer.
The data suggested that, from age 25 to 75, at least one false-positive result would occur in 48% of women screened with mammography, 74% screened with MRI alone, and 79% screened with both methods.
The number of false-positives per 1000 screens would be 29.98 with mammography, 71.71 with MRI, and 99.52 with either same-day mammography and MRI or alternating mammography and MRI.
“So this is important for patients to know and for physicians to counsel patients about because it’s stressful for a patient to be called back about suspicious findings,” Dr Hodgson said.
A new study indicates that early screening can reduce the risk of death from breast cancer among female survivors of childhood Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) who received chest radiation.
Researchers found evidence to suggest that starting mammograms at age 25 can reduce the risk of breast cancer death among these patients, but using MRI can reduce the risk further.
Unfortunately, both methods come with a risk of false-positive results.
David Hodgson, MD, of the University of Toronto in Canada, and his colleagues reported these findings in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
Dr Hodgson estimates there are thousands of HL survivors in North America treated throughout the 1990s and later who received chest radiation and are unaware they are at risk of breast cancer and eligible for early screening.
“Many of these are women who received radiotherapy to more normal tissue or at higher doses than are used currently,” he said. “But even for more recently treated patients, screening should reduce the risk of breast cancer death.”
For this study, Dr Hodgson and his colleagues gathered published information from dozens of studies about the risk of developing breast cancer in childhood HL survivors, the accuracy of different forms of breast cancer screening, and the rates at which women agree to be screened when asked.
Using mathematical models, the researchers used these data to quantify the effectiveness of starting screening early—at age 25.
The team found that, using mammography, about 260 survivors of childhood HL would need to be invited to have early breast cancer screening to prevent 1 breast cancer death.
However, the use of MRI for screening improved the effectiveness considerably. It reduced the number of women needing screening to prevent 1 breast cancer death to less than 80.
For HL survivors treated at age 15, the absolute risk of breast cancer mortality by age 75 was predicted to decrease from 16.65% with no early screening to 16.28% with annual mammography, 15.40% with annual MRI, 15.38% with same-day annual mammography and MRI, and 15.37% with alternating mammography and MRI every 6 months.
Dr Hodgson cautioned that there is a risk of false-positive screening results, particuarly with MRI, given that the method can detect many changes in breast tissue, most of which are not cancer.
The data suggested that, from age 25 to 75, at least one false-positive result would occur in 48% of women screened with mammography, 74% screened with MRI alone, and 79% screened with both methods.
The number of false-positives per 1000 screens would be 29.98 with mammography, 71.71 with MRI, and 99.52 with either same-day mammography and MRI or alternating mammography and MRI.
“So this is important for patients to know and for physicians to counsel patients about because it’s stressful for a patient to be called back about suspicious findings,” Dr Hodgson said.
A new study indicates that early screening can reduce the risk of death from breast cancer among female survivors of childhood Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) who received chest radiation.
Researchers found evidence to suggest that starting mammograms at age 25 can reduce the risk of breast cancer death among these patients, but using MRI can reduce the risk further.
Unfortunately, both methods come with a risk of false-positive results.
David Hodgson, MD, of the University of Toronto in Canada, and his colleagues reported these findings in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
Dr Hodgson estimates there are thousands of HL survivors in North America treated throughout the 1990s and later who received chest radiation and are unaware they are at risk of breast cancer and eligible for early screening.
“Many of these are women who received radiotherapy to more normal tissue or at higher doses than are used currently,” he said. “But even for more recently treated patients, screening should reduce the risk of breast cancer death.”
For this study, Dr Hodgson and his colleagues gathered published information from dozens of studies about the risk of developing breast cancer in childhood HL survivors, the accuracy of different forms of breast cancer screening, and the rates at which women agree to be screened when asked.
Using mathematical models, the researchers used these data to quantify the effectiveness of starting screening early—at age 25.
The team found that, using mammography, about 260 survivors of childhood HL would need to be invited to have early breast cancer screening to prevent 1 breast cancer death.
However, the use of MRI for screening improved the effectiveness considerably. It reduced the number of women needing screening to prevent 1 breast cancer death to less than 80.
For HL survivors treated at age 15, the absolute risk of breast cancer mortality by age 75 was predicted to decrease from 16.65% with no early screening to 16.28% with annual mammography, 15.40% with annual MRI, 15.38% with same-day annual mammography and MRI, and 15.37% with alternating mammography and MRI every 6 months.
Dr Hodgson cautioned that there is a risk of false-positive screening results, particuarly with MRI, given that the method can detect many changes in breast tissue, most of which are not cancer.
The data suggested that, from age 25 to 75, at least one false-positive result would occur in 48% of women screened with mammography, 74% screened with MRI alone, and 79% screened with both methods.
The number of false-positives per 1000 screens would be 29.98 with mammography, 71.71 with MRI, and 99.52 with either same-day mammography and MRI or alternating mammography and MRI.
“So this is important for patients to know and for physicians to counsel patients about because it’s stressful for a patient to be called back about suspicious findings,” Dr Hodgson said.