User login
TOPLINE:
People with central obesity (CO), characterized by excess fat around the abdomen, are at a greater risk for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), particularly those who are younger than 60 years or without a history of hysterectomy. Also, women who have overweight but do not have CO are at greater risk.
METHODOLOGY:
- Researchers conducted a prospective cohort study to estimate the association between CO and general obesity and the risk for POP in individuals using the UK Biobank.
- A total of 251,143 participants (median age, 57 years) without preexisting POP were included, of whom 60.9% were postmenopausal and 17.2% had undergone hysterectomy before enrollment.
- Participants were followed for a median duration of 13.8 years, and POP cases were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes.
- Waist circumference, height, and body weight were measured at enrollment for the calculation of waist/height ratio and body mass index (BMI); CO was defined as a waist/height ratio ≥ 0.5.
- The relative risk of POP for the various combinations of waist/height ratio and BMI was evaluated against the reference group (waist/height ratio < 0.5; BMI < 25) using Cox proportional hazards models.
TAKEAWAY:
- During the follow-up period, 9781 cases of POP were identified, of which 71.2% occurred in a single pelvic compartment.
- Around 21.7% of all POP cases were attributable to CO; 2% were attributable to being overweight without CO.
- The risk for POP was 48% higher in individuals with CO regardless of BMI (hazard ratio [HR], 1.48; 95% CI, 1.41-1.56) and 23% higher in those who had overweight without CO (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.14-1.34).
- The association between POP and CO was further strengthened in individuals who were younger than 60 years and those without a history of hysterectomy.
IN PRACTICE:
“We found that waist/height ratio combined with BMI could help differentiate individuals with varying risks of prolapse more accurately. Among individuals within the same BMI category, waist/height ratio can vary, with those having a higher ratio generally facing a greater risk of POP, compared with those with a normal ratio. Therefore, they should not be grouped together based solely on a single measure of obesity. In addition, this combination can help identify more individuals at high risk for POP, compared with using either alone,” the study authors wrote.
SOURCE:
This study was led by Keyi Si, PhD, of Tongji University in Shanghai, China, and was published online in Obstetrics & Gynecology.
LIMITATIONS:
Differences in healthcare-seeking behavior could have biased the association between obesity and risk for POP, as individuals with obesity may have been less likely to notice or report symptoms of POP. The diagnosis of POP was according to ICD-10 codes rather than physical examination, which may have affected accuracy. Other limitations included missing data on delivery mode and history of constipation.
DISCLOSURES:
This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, the Shanghai Hospital Development Center, and the Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication. A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
People with central obesity (CO), characterized by excess fat around the abdomen, are at a greater risk for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), particularly those who are younger than 60 years or without a history of hysterectomy. Also, women who have overweight but do not have CO are at greater risk.
METHODOLOGY:
- Researchers conducted a prospective cohort study to estimate the association between CO and general obesity and the risk for POP in individuals using the UK Biobank.
- A total of 251,143 participants (median age, 57 years) without preexisting POP were included, of whom 60.9% were postmenopausal and 17.2% had undergone hysterectomy before enrollment.
- Participants were followed for a median duration of 13.8 years, and POP cases were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes.
- Waist circumference, height, and body weight were measured at enrollment for the calculation of waist/height ratio and body mass index (BMI); CO was defined as a waist/height ratio ≥ 0.5.
- The relative risk of POP for the various combinations of waist/height ratio and BMI was evaluated against the reference group (waist/height ratio < 0.5; BMI < 25) using Cox proportional hazards models.
TAKEAWAY:
- During the follow-up period, 9781 cases of POP were identified, of which 71.2% occurred in a single pelvic compartment.
- Around 21.7% of all POP cases were attributable to CO; 2% were attributable to being overweight without CO.
- The risk for POP was 48% higher in individuals with CO regardless of BMI (hazard ratio [HR], 1.48; 95% CI, 1.41-1.56) and 23% higher in those who had overweight without CO (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.14-1.34).
- The association between POP and CO was further strengthened in individuals who were younger than 60 years and those without a history of hysterectomy.
IN PRACTICE:
“We found that waist/height ratio combined with BMI could help differentiate individuals with varying risks of prolapse more accurately. Among individuals within the same BMI category, waist/height ratio can vary, with those having a higher ratio generally facing a greater risk of POP, compared with those with a normal ratio. Therefore, they should not be grouped together based solely on a single measure of obesity. In addition, this combination can help identify more individuals at high risk for POP, compared with using either alone,” the study authors wrote.
SOURCE:
This study was led by Keyi Si, PhD, of Tongji University in Shanghai, China, and was published online in Obstetrics & Gynecology.
LIMITATIONS:
Differences in healthcare-seeking behavior could have biased the association between obesity and risk for POP, as individuals with obesity may have been less likely to notice or report symptoms of POP. The diagnosis of POP was according to ICD-10 codes rather than physical examination, which may have affected accuracy. Other limitations included missing data on delivery mode and history of constipation.
DISCLOSURES:
This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, the Shanghai Hospital Development Center, and the Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication. A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
People with central obesity (CO), characterized by excess fat around the abdomen, are at a greater risk for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), particularly those who are younger than 60 years or without a history of hysterectomy. Also, women who have overweight but do not have CO are at greater risk.
METHODOLOGY:
- Researchers conducted a prospective cohort study to estimate the association between CO and general obesity and the risk for POP in individuals using the UK Biobank.
- A total of 251,143 participants (median age, 57 years) without preexisting POP were included, of whom 60.9% were postmenopausal and 17.2% had undergone hysterectomy before enrollment.
- Participants were followed for a median duration of 13.8 years, and POP cases were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes.
- Waist circumference, height, and body weight were measured at enrollment for the calculation of waist/height ratio and body mass index (BMI); CO was defined as a waist/height ratio ≥ 0.5.
- The relative risk of POP for the various combinations of waist/height ratio and BMI was evaluated against the reference group (waist/height ratio < 0.5; BMI < 25) using Cox proportional hazards models.
TAKEAWAY:
- During the follow-up period, 9781 cases of POP were identified, of which 71.2% occurred in a single pelvic compartment.
- Around 21.7% of all POP cases were attributable to CO; 2% were attributable to being overweight without CO.
- The risk for POP was 48% higher in individuals with CO regardless of BMI (hazard ratio [HR], 1.48; 95% CI, 1.41-1.56) and 23% higher in those who had overweight without CO (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.14-1.34).
- The association between POP and CO was further strengthened in individuals who were younger than 60 years and those without a history of hysterectomy.
IN PRACTICE:
“We found that waist/height ratio combined with BMI could help differentiate individuals with varying risks of prolapse more accurately. Among individuals within the same BMI category, waist/height ratio can vary, with those having a higher ratio generally facing a greater risk of POP, compared with those with a normal ratio. Therefore, they should not be grouped together based solely on a single measure of obesity. In addition, this combination can help identify more individuals at high risk for POP, compared with using either alone,” the study authors wrote.
SOURCE:
This study was led by Keyi Si, PhD, of Tongji University in Shanghai, China, and was published online in Obstetrics & Gynecology.
LIMITATIONS:
Differences in healthcare-seeking behavior could have biased the association between obesity and risk for POP, as individuals with obesity may have been less likely to notice or report symptoms of POP. The diagnosis of POP was according to ICD-10 codes rather than physical examination, which may have affected accuracy. Other limitations included missing data on delivery mode and history of constipation.
DISCLOSURES:
This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, the Shanghai Hospital Development Center, and the Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication. A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.