User login
Credit: NIH
In a study comparing healthcare in 11 industrialized countries, the US ranked last on measures of health system quality, efficiency, access to care, equity, and healthy lives.
The other countries included in this study were Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK.
While the results revealed room for improvement in every country, the US stood out for having the highest costs and lowest performance.
For instance, the US spent $8508 per person on healthcare in 2011, compared with $3406 in the UK, which ranked first overall.
Details on expenditures and rankings derived from this study are available in the Commonwealth Fund report, Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: How the Performance of the U.S. Health Care System Compares Internationally, 2014 Update.
“It is disappointing, but not surprising, that, despite our significant investment in healthcare, the US has continued to lag behind other countries,” said lead report author Karen Davis, of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, Maryland.
The report was also produced in 2004, 2006, 2007, and 2010, with the US ranking last in each of those years. Four countries were added to this year’s report: Switzerland and Sweden, which followed the UK at the top of the rankings, and Norway and France, which were in the middle of the pack.
Australia, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, and Norway also placed in the middle, and Canada ranked just above the US.
In addition to ranking last overall, the US ranked last on infant mortality and on deaths that were potentially preventable with timely access to effective healthcare. The country ranked second-to-last on healthy life expectancy at age 60.
The US also ranked last on every measure of cost-related access. More than one-third (37%) of US adults reported forgoing a recommended test, treatment, or follow-up care because of cost.
With regard to healthcare quality, the US fell somewhere in the middle. On 2 of 4 measures of quality—effective care and patient-centered care—the US ranked near the top (3rd and 4th of 11 countries, respectively). But it did not perform as well with regard to providing safe or coordinated care.
The US ranked last in efficiency, due to low marks on the time and dollars spent dealing with insurance administration, lack of communication among healthcare providers, and duplicative medical testing.
Forty percent of US adults who had visited an emergency room reported they could have been treated by a regular doctor if one had been available. This is more than double the rate of patients in the UK (16%).
The US also ranked last in healthcare equity. About 4 of 10 (39%) adults with below-average incomes in the US reported a medical problem but did not visit a doctor in the past year because of costs, compared with less than 1 of 10 in the UK, Sweden, Canada, and Norway.
There were also large discrepancies in the length of time US adults waited for specialist, emergency, and after-hours care. And wait times were associated with patient income.
The data for this research were drawn from the Commonwealth Fund 2011 International Health Policy Survey of Sicker Adults, the Commonwealth Fund 2012 International Health Policy Survey of Primary Care Physicians, and the Commonwealth Fund 2013 International Health Policy Survey.
The 2011 survey targeted a representative sample of “sicker adults,” defined as those who rated their health status as fair or poor, received medical care for a serious chronic illness, serious injury, or disability in the past year, or were hospitalized or underwent surgery in the previous 2 years.
The 2012 survey looked at the experiences of primary care physicians. The 2013 survey focused on the experiences of nationally representative samples of adults ages 18 and older.
Additional data on health outcomes were drawn from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and the World Health Organization. 
Credit: NIH
In a study comparing healthcare in 11 industrialized countries, the US ranked last on measures of health system quality, efficiency, access to care, equity, and healthy lives.
The other countries included in this study were Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK.
While the results revealed room for improvement in every country, the US stood out for having the highest costs and lowest performance.
For instance, the US spent $8508 per person on healthcare in 2011, compared with $3406 in the UK, which ranked first overall.
Details on expenditures and rankings derived from this study are available in the Commonwealth Fund report, Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: How the Performance of the U.S. Health Care System Compares Internationally, 2014 Update.
“It is disappointing, but not surprising, that, despite our significant investment in healthcare, the US has continued to lag behind other countries,” said lead report author Karen Davis, of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, Maryland.
The report was also produced in 2004, 2006, 2007, and 2010, with the US ranking last in each of those years. Four countries were added to this year’s report: Switzerland and Sweden, which followed the UK at the top of the rankings, and Norway and France, which were in the middle of the pack.
Australia, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, and Norway also placed in the middle, and Canada ranked just above the US.
In addition to ranking last overall, the US ranked last on infant mortality and on deaths that were potentially preventable with timely access to effective healthcare. The country ranked second-to-last on healthy life expectancy at age 60.
The US also ranked last on every measure of cost-related access. More than one-third (37%) of US adults reported forgoing a recommended test, treatment, or follow-up care because of cost.
With regard to healthcare quality, the US fell somewhere in the middle. On 2 of 4 measures of quality—effective care and patient-centered care—the US ranked near the top (3rd and 4th of 11 countries, respectively). But it did not perform as well with regard to providing safe or coordinated care.
The US ranked last in efficiency, due to low marks on the time and dollars spent dealing with insurance administration, lack of communication among healthcare providers, and duplicative medical testing.
Forty percent of US adults who had visited an emergency room reported they could have been treated by a regular doctor if one had been available. This is more than double the rate of patients in the UK (16%).
The US also ranked last in healthcare equity. About 4 of 10 (39%) adults with below-average incomes in the US reported a medical problem but did not visit a doctor in the past year because of costs, compared with less than 1 of 10 in the UK, Sweden, Canada, and Norway.
There were also large discrepancies in the length of time US adults waited for specialist, emergency, and after-hours care. And wait times were associated with patient income.
The data for this research were drawn from the Commonwealth Fund 2011 International Health Policy Survey of Sicker Adults, the Commonwealth Fund 2012 International Health Policy Survey of Primary Care Physicians, and the Commonwealth Fund 2013 International Health Policy Survey.
The 2011 survey targeted a representative sample of “sicker adults,” defined as those who rated their health status as fair or poor, received medical care for a serious chronic illness, serious injury, or disability in the past year, or were hospitalized or underwent surgery in the previous 2 years.
The 2012 survey looked at the experiences of primary care physicians. The 2013 survey focused on the experiences of nationally representative samples of adults ages 18 and older.
Additional data on health outcomes were drawn from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and the World Health Organization.
Credit: NIH
In a study comparing healthcare in 11 industrialized countries, the US ranked last on measures of health system quality, efficiency, access to care, equity, and healthy lives.
The other countries included in this study were Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK.
While the results revealed room for improvement in every country, the US stood out for having the highest costs and lowest performance.
For instance, the US spent $8508 per person on healthcare in 2011, compared with $3406 in the UK, which ranked first overall.
Details on expenditures and rankings derived from this study are available in the Commonwealth Fund report, Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: How the Performance of the U.S. Health Care System Compares Internationally, 2014 Update.
“It is disappointing, but not surprising, that, despite our significant investment in healthcare, the US has continued to lag behind other countries,” said lead report author Karen Davis, of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, Maryland.
The report was also produced in 2004, 2006, 2007, and 2010, with the US ranking last in each of those years. Four countries were added to this year’s report: Switzerland and Sweden, which followed the UK at the top of the rankings, and Norway and France, which were in the middle of the pack.
Australia, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, and Norway also placed in the middle, and Canada ranked just above the US.
In addition to ranking last overall, the US ranked last on infant mortality and on deaths that were potentially preventable with timely access to effective healthcare. The country ranked second-to-last on healthy life expectancy at age 60.
The US also ranked last on every measure of cost-related access. More than one-third (37%) of US adults reported forgoing a recommended test, treatment, or follow-up care because of cost.
With regard to healthcare quality, the US fell somewhere in the middle. On 2 of 4 measures of quality—effective care and patient-centered care—the US ranked near the top (3rd and 4th of 11 countries, respectively). But it did not perform as well with regard to providing safe or coordinated care.
The US ranked last in efficiency, due to low marks on the time and dollars spent dealing with insurance administration, lack of communication among healthcare providers, and duplicative medical testing.
Forty percent of US adults who had visited an emergency room reported they could have been treated by a regular doctor if one had been available. This is more than double the rate of patients in the UK (16%).
The US also ranked last in healthcare equity. About 4 of 10 (39%) adults with below-average incomes in the US reported a medical problem but did not visit a doctor in the past year because of costs, compared with less than 1 of 10 in the UK, Sweden, Canada, and Norway.
There were also large discrepancies in the length of time US adults waited for specialist, emergency, and after-hours care. And wait times were associated with patient income.
The data for this research were drawn from the Commonwealth Fund 2011 International Health Policy Survey of Sicker Adults, the Commonwealth Fund 2012 International Health Policy Survey of Primary Care Physicians, and the Commonwealth Fund 2013 International Health Policy Survey.
The 2011 survey targeted a representative sample of “sicker adults,” defined as those who rated their health status as fair or poor, received medical care for a serious chronic illness, serious injury, or disability in the past year, or were hospitalized or underwent surgery in the previous 2 years.
The 2012 survey looked at the experiences of primary care physicians. The 2013 survey focused on the experiences of nationally representative samples of adults ages 18 and older.
Additional data on health outcomes were drawn from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and the World Health Organization.