User login
Bringing you the latest news, research and reviews, exclusive interviews, podcasts, quizzes, and more.
Powered by CHEST Physician, Clinician Reviews, MDedge Family Medicine, Internal Medicine News, and The Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management.
Benralizumab maintains effectiveness in severe asthma at 2 years
out to 2 years, according findings of the BORA trial, an extension study of the phase 3 SIROCCO and CALIMA trials. The study follows up and reinforces previously reported 1-year data and was reported by William W. Busse, MD, of University of Wisconsin, Madison, and his colleagues in the Lancet Respiratory Medicine.
Benralizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets interleukin-5 receptor alpha. It causes rapid deletion of eosinophils through cell-mediated cytotoxicity. A 30-mg dose of benralizumab every 8 weeks is approved for severe asthma treatment in Canada, Europe, Japan, the United States, and other countries.
In the second year of treatment, there were no new adverse events associated with depleted eosinophils, and the frequency of opportunistic infections was similar to that observed in the first year.
Eosinophilic inflammation occurs in about half of asthma cases and is associated with greater severity.
The 48-week SIROCCO trial, the 56-week CALIMA trial, and the 28-week ZONDA trial tested the effect of benralizumab 30 mg given every 4 weeks or 8 weeks, combined with high-dosage inhaled steroids and long-acting beta2-agonists. The 8-week dose of the drug reduced annual exacerbations by 51%, compared with placebo in the SIROCCO trial and by 28% in the CALIMA trial. In the ZONDA trial, benralizumab reduced oral glucocorticoid use by 75%, compared with placebo, and by 25% from baseline.
The BORA extension trial included participants in the previous three trials. In the current report, researchers presented results from the analysis from BORA participants recruited from the SIROCCO and CALIMA trials. Data from participants from all three trials will be reported in the future.
The analysis included 1,576 patients who continued to receive benralizumab after being assigned to the treatment arm in SIROCCO or CALIMA, or who had received placebo were randomized to benralizumab on the 4-week (n = 783; 265 from placebo) or 8-week dose (n = 793; 281 from placebo) schedule.
A total of 166 patients, or about 10% in each group, discontinued treatment. The frequency of any serious adverse event (SAE) ranged between 10% and 11% in all groups. SAEs associated with infections ranged from 1% to 3%, indicating that there were no significant differences in SAE frequencies between those who were originally assigned to placebo and those who originally received benralizumab. That suggests no safety differences between receiving the drug for 1 year or 2 years.
A total of 1,046 subjects had blood eosinophil counts of 300 cells per mcL or greater at baseline; 72% of these patients had no asthma exacerbations during the BORA study. This was true for 74% of patients in the 8-week treatment arm.
The crude asthma exacerbation rate for patients who received benralizumab in SIROCCO or CALIMA was 0.48 in the 4-week arm, compared with placebo (95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.56) and 0.46 in the 8-week arm (95% CI, 0.39-0.53). For patients who started out on placebo, the crude exacerbation rate during BORA was 0.53 in the 4-week group (95% CI, 0.43-0.65) and 0.57 in the 8-week group (95% CI, 0.47-0.68).
Patients who started on benralizumab had similar exacerbation frequencies during year 1 and year 2.
AstraZeneca and Kyowa Hakko Kirin funded the studies. The authors have received fees from AstraZeneca and other pharmaceutical companies, and some are employees of AstraZeneca.
SOURCE: Busse WW et al. Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Jan 1;7(1):46-59.
out to 2 years, according findings of the BORA trial, an extension study of the phase 3 SIROCCO and CALIMA trials. The study follows up and reinforces previously reported 1-year data and was reported by William W. Busse, MD, of University of Wisconsin, Madison, and his colleagues in the Lancet Respiratory Medicine.
Benralizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets interleukin-5 receptor alpha. It causes rapid deletion of eosinophils through cell-mediated cytotoxicity. A 30-mg dose of benralizumab every 8 weeks is approved for severe asthma treatment in Canada, Europe, Japan, the United States, and other countries.
In the second year of treatment, there were no new adverse events associated with depleted eosinophils, and the frequency of opportunistic infections was similar to that observed in the first year.
Eosinophilic inflammation occurs in about half of asthma cases and is associated with greater severity.
The 48-week SIROCCO trial, the 56-week CALIMA trial, and the 28-week ZONDA trial tested the effect of benralizumab 30 mg given every 4 weeks or 8 weeks, combined with high-dosage inhaled steroids and long-acting beta2-agonists. The 8-week dose of the drug reduced annual exacerbations by 51%, compared with placebo in the SIROCCO trial and by 28% in the CALIMA trial. In the ZONDA trial, benralizumab reduced oral glucocorticoid use by 75%, compared with placebo, and by 25% from baseline.
The BORA extension trial included participants in the previous three trials. In the current report, researchers presented results from the analysis from BORA participants recruited from the SIROCCO and CALIMA trials. Data from participants from all three trials will be reported in the future.
The analysis included 1,576 patients who continued to receive benralizumab after being assigned to the treatment arm in SIROCCO or CALIMA, or who had received placebo were randomized to benralizumab on the 4-week (n = 783; 265 from placebo) or 8-week dose (n = 793; 281 from placebo) schedule.
A total of 166 patients, or about 10% in each group, discontinued treatment. The frequency of any serious adverse event (SAE) ranged between 10% and 11% in all groups. SAEs associated with infections ranged from 1% to 3%, indicating that there were no significant differences in SAE frequencies between those who were originally assigned to placebo and those who originally received benralizumab. That suggests no safety differences between receiving the drug for 1 year or 2 years.
A total of 1,046 subjects had blood eosinophil counts of 300 cells per mcL or greater at baseline; 72% of these patients had no asthma exacerbations during the BORA study. This was true for 74% of patients in the 8-week treatment arm.
The crude asthma exacerbation rate for patients who received benralizumab in SIROCCO or CALIMA was 0.48 in the 4-week arm, compared with placebo (95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.56) and 0.46 in the 8-week arm (95% CI, 0.39-0.53). For patients who started out on placebo, the crude exacerbation rate during BORA was 0.53 in the 4-week group (95% CI, 0.43-0.65) and 0.57 in the 8-week group (95% CI, 0.47-0.68).
Patients who started on benralizumab had similar exacerbation frequencies during year 1 and year 2.
AstraZeneca and Kyowa Hakko Kirin funded the studies. The authors have received fees from AstraZeneca and other pharmaceutical companies, and some are employees of AstraZeneca.
SOURCE: Busse WW et al. Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Jan 1;7(1):46-59.
out to 2 years, according findings of the BORA trial, an extension study of the phase 3 SIROCCO and CALIMA trials. The study follows up and reinforces previously reported 1-year data and was reported by William W. Busse, MD, of University of Wisconsin, Madison, and his colleagues in the Lancet Respiratory Medicine.
Benralizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets interleukin-5 receptor alpha. It causes rapid deletion of eosinophils through cell-mediated cytotoxicity. A 30-mg dose of benralizumab every 8 weeks is approved for severe asthma treatment in Canada, Europe, Japan, the United States, and other countries.
In the second year of treatment, there were no new adverse events associated with depleted eosinophils, and the frequency of opportunistic infections was similar to that observed in the first year.
Eosinophilic inflammation occurs in about half of asthma cases and is associated with greater severity.
The 48-week SIROCCO trial, the 56-week CALIMA trial, and the 28-week ZONDA trial tested the effect of benralizumab 30 mg given every 4 weeks or 8 weeks, combined with high-dosage inhaled steroids and long-acting beta2-agonists. The 8-week dose of the drug reduced annual exacerbations by 51%, compared with placebo in the SIROCCO trial and by 28% in the CALIMA trial. In the ZONDA trial, benralizumab reduced oral glucocorticoid use by 75%, compared with placebo, and by 25% from baseline.
The BORA extension trial included participants in the previous three trials. In the current report, researchers presented results from the analysis from BORA participants recruited from the SIROCCO and CALIMA trials. Data from participants from all three trials will be reported in the future.
The analysis included 1,576 patients who continued to receive benralizumab after being assigned to the treatment arm in SIROCCO or CALIMA, or who had received placebo were randomized to benralizumab on the 4-week (n = 783; 265 from placebo) or 8-week dose (n = 793; 281 from placebo) schedule.
A total of 166 patients, or about 10% in each group, discontinued treatment. The frequency of any serious adverse event (SAE) ranged between 10% and 11% in all groups. SAEs associated with infections ranged from 1% to 3%, indicating that there were no significant differences in SAE frequencies between those who were originally assigned to placebo and those who originally received benralizumab. That suggests no safety differences between receiving the drug for 1 year or 2 years.
A total of 1,046 subjects had blood eosinophil counts of 300 cells per mcL or greater at baseline; 72% of these patients had no asthma exacerbations during the BORA study. This was true for 74% of patients in the 8-week treatment arm.
The crude asthma exacerbation rate for patients who received benralizumab in SIROCCO or CALIMA was 0.48 in the 4-week arm, compared with placebo (95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.56) and 0.46 in the 8-week arm (95% CI, 0.39-0.53). For patients who started out on placebo, the crude exacerbation rate during BORA was 0.53 in the 4-week group (95% CI, 0.43-0.65) and 0.57 in the 8-week group (95% CI, 0.47-0.68).
Patients who started on benralizumab had similar exacerbation frequencies during year 1 and year 2.
AstraZeneca and Kyowa Hakko Kirin funded the studies. The authors have received fees from AstraZeneca and other pharmaceutical companies, and some are employees of AstraZeneca.
SOURCE: Busse WW et al. Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Jan 1;7(1):46-59.
FROM THE LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
Key clinical point: The antibody had similar safety, efficacy in year 2 as in year 1.
Major finding: The crude asthma exacerbation rate for patients who received benralizumab in SIROCCO or CALIMA was 0.48 in the 4-week arm and 0.46 in the 8-week arm; the crude exacerbation rate during BORA was 0.53 in the 4-week group and 0.57 in the 8-week group.
Study details: Extension of randomized, clinical trial (n = 1,576).
Disclosures: AstraZeneca and Kyowa Hakko Kirin funded the studies. The authors have received fees from AstraZeneca and other pharmaceutical companies, and some are employees of AstraZeneca.
Source: Busse WW et al. Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Jan 1;7(1):46-59.
Secondhand vaping aerosols linked to childhood asthma exacerbations
Just like exposure to secondhand smoke, , according to a review of the 11,830 kids with asthma in the 2016 Florida Youth Tobacco survey.
Every year, the Florida Department of Health surveys public school children aged 11-17 years about various tobacco issues. In 2016, almost 12% of the asthmatic children in the survey said they vaped. Almost half were exposed to secondhand smoke, and a third reported exposure to secondhand vaping aerosols within the past 30 days. Overall, 21% reported an asthma attack in the past 12 months.
Using data from the Florida survey, the investigators crunched the numbers and found that secondhand aerosol exposure increased the odds of an asthma attack by 27%, independent of exposure to secondhand smoke and whether children smoked or vaped themselves (adjusted odds ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.47).
“Health professionals may wish to counsel asthmatic youth and their families regarding the potential risks of ENDS [electronic nicotine delivery system] use and exposure to ENDS aerosols.” Providers “may also consider including ENDS aerosol exposure as a possible trigger in asthma self-management/action plans and updating asthma home environment assessments to include exposure to ENDS aerosols,” said investigators led by medical student Jennifer Bayly, a research fellow at the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities in Bethesda, Md.
About 4% of adults in the United States and 11% of high school students vape, and almost 10% of U.S. adolescents reported living with an ENDS user in 2014. Given the data, “it is likely that a substantial number of asthmatic youth are exposed,” the investigators said.
The study adds to a growing body of evidence linking e-cigarettes to asthma. There’s moderate evidence for increased cough and wheezing in adolescents who use e-cigarettes, plus an association with e-cigarette use and increased asthma exacerbations. The new study, however, is likely the first to look specifically at secondhand exposure among asthmatic children. Ingredients in vaping aerosols, including flavorings, propylene glycol, and vegetable glycerin, are physiologically active in the lungs, and may be lung irritants.
Overall, about half of the respondents were female, and two-thirds were 11-13 years old. About a third identified as Hispanic, a third as white, and just over a fifth as black. Three-quarters of the sample lived in large or midsized metropolitan areas, and close to two-thirds in stand-alone homes. Participants were considered exposed to secondhand aerosols if they reported that in the past month they were in a room or car with someone who was vaping.
The work was funded by the National Institutes of Health. The investigators had no disclosures.
SOURCE: Bayly JE et al. CHEST®. 2018 Oct 22. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.10.005.
Just like exposure to secondhand smoke, , according to a review of the 11,830 kids with asthma in the 2016 Florida Youth Tobacco survey.
Every year, the Florida Department of Health surveys public school children aged 11-17 years about various tobacco issues. In 2016, almost 12% of the asthmatic children in the survey said they vaped. Almost half were exposed to secondhand smoke, and a third reported exposure to secondhand vaping aerosols within the past 30 days. Overall, 21% reported an asthma attack in the past 12 months.
Using data from the Florida survey, the investigators crunched the numbers and found that secondhand aerosol exposure increased the odds of an asthma attack by 27%, independent of exposure to secondhand smoke and whether children smoked or vaped themselves (adjusted odds ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.47).
“Health professionals may wish to counsel asthmatic youth and their families regarding the potential risks of ENDS [electronic nicotine delivery system] use and exposure to ENDS aerosols.” Providers “may also consider including ENDS aerosol exposure as a possible trigger in asthma self-management/action plans and updating asthma home environment assessments to include exposure to ENDS aerosols,” said investigators led by medical student Jennifer Bayly, a research fellow at the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities in Bethesda, Md.
About 4% of adults in the United States and 11% of high school students vape, and almost 10% of U.S. adolescents reported living with an ENDS user in 2014. Given the data, “it is likely that a substantial number of asthmatic youth are exposed,” the investigators said.
The study adds to a growing body of evidence linking e-cigarettes to asthma. There’s moderate evidence for increased cough and wheezing in adolescents who use e-cigarettes, plus an association with e-cigarette use and increased asthma exacerbations. The new study, however, is likely the first to look specifically at secondhand exposure among asthmatic children. Ingredients in vaping aerosols, including flavorings, propylene glycol, and vegetable glycerin, are physiologically active in the lungs, and may be lung irritants.
Overall, about half of the respondents were female, and two-thirds were 11-13 years old. About a third identified as Hispanic, a third as white, and just over a fifth as black. Three-quarters of the sample lived in large or midsized metropolitan areas, and close to two-thirds in stand-alone homes. Participants were considered exposed to secondhand aerosols if they reported that in the past month they were in a room or car with someone who was vaping.
The work was funded by the National Institutes of Health. The investigators had no disclosures.
SOURCE: Bayly JE et al. CHEST®. 2018 Oct 22. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.10.005.
Just like exposure to secondhand smoke, , according to a review of the 11,830 kids with asthma in the 2016 Florida Youth Tobacco survey.
Every year, the Florida Department of Health surveys public school children aged 11-17 years about various tobacco issues. In 2016, almost 12% of the asthmatic children in the survey said they vaped. Almost half were exposed to secondhand smoke, and a third reported exposure to secondhand vaping aerosols within the past 30 days. Overall, 21% reported an asthma attack in the past 12 months.
Using data from the Florida survey, the investigators crunched the numbers and found that secondhand aerosol exposure increased the odds of an asthma attack by 27%, independent of exposure to secondhand smoke and whether children smoked or vaped themselves (adjusted odds ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.47).
“Health professionals may wish to counsel asthmatic youth and their families regarding the potential risks of ENDS [electronic nicotine delivery system] use and exposure to ENDS aerosols.” Providers “may also consider including ENDS aerosol exposure as a possible trigger in asthma self-management/action plans and updating asthma home environment assessments to include exposure to ENDS aerosols,” said investigators led by medical student Jennifer Bayly, a research fellow at the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities in Bethesda, Md.
About 4% of adults in the United States and 11% of high school students vape, and almost 10% of U.S. adolescents reported living with an ENDS user in 2014. Given the data, “it is likely that a substantial number of asthmatic youth are exposed,” the investigators said.
The study adds to a growing body of evidence linking e-cigarettes to asthma. There’s moderate evidence for increased cough and wheezing in adolescents who use e-cigarettes, plus an association with e-cigarette use and increased asthma exacerbations. The new study, however, is likely the first to look specifically at secondhand exposure among asthmatic children. Ingredients in vaping aerosols, including flavorings, propylene glycol, and vegetable glycerin, are physiologically active in the lungs, and may be lung irritants.
Overall, about half of the respondents were female, and two-thirds were 11-13 years old. About a third identified as Hispanic, a third as white, and just over a fifth as black. Three-quarters of the sample lived in large or midsized metropolitan areas, and close to two-thirds in stand-alone homes. Participants were considered exposed to secondhand aerosols if they reported that in the past month they were in a room or car with someone who was vaping.
The work was funded by the National Institutes of Health. The investigators had no disclosures.
SOURCE: Bayly JE et al. CHEST®. 2018 Oct 22. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.10.005.
FROM CHEST®
Key clinical point: It’s important to screen asthmatic children for exposure to secondhand vaping aerosols, and minimize exposure.
Major finding: Secondhand aerosols increased the odds of an asthma attack 27%, independent of exposure to secondhand smoke and whether children smoked or vaped themselves.
Study details: Analysis of 11,830 children with asthma in the 2016 Florida Youth Tobacco survey.
Disclosures: The work was funded by the National Institutes of Health. The investigators had no disclosures.
Source: Bayly JE et al. CHEST®. 2018 Oct 22. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.10.005.
New CHEST expert panel advice on cough diagnosis
The CHEST Expert Cough Panel has released two new in adults and children.
Upper and lower respiratory tract infections are a common reason for primary care visits. A cough caused by influenza or pneumonia represents an opportunity to intervene for a significant benefit. The recommendations were published in CHEST®. The panel drafted recommendations based on available evidence and graded them using the CHEST grading system. The grading is based on the strength of the recommendation (either strong or weak) and a rating of the overall quality of the body of evidence. Where available evidence was weak, but guidance was still warranted, a weak suggestion was developed and graded 2C. Recommendations based on consensus in cases of insufficient clinical evidence are labeled “ungraded consensus-based statement.”
Suspected pneumonia or influenza
In adult outpatients with acute cough, the clinical signs of pneumonia include cough, dyspnea, pleural pain, sweating/fevers/shivers, aches and pains, temperature greater than or equal to 38°C, tachypnea, and new and localizing chest examination signs. When pneumonia is suspected to cause acute cough, C-reactive protein (CRP) should be measured. A CRP value higher than 30 mg/L bolsters the case for pneumonia, whereas a CRP value of lower than 10 mg/L, or between 10 mg/L and 50 mg/L in the absence of dyspnea and daily fever, makes pneumonia less likely.
The guidelines recommend against routine measurement of procalcitonin for outpatient adults suspected to have pneumonia. For adults with acute cough and abnormal vital signs believed to be secondary to pneumonia, the guidelines call for a chest x-ray.
Routine microbiological testing need not be performed in suspected pneumonia, but it should be considered if the results could guide or lead to a change in therapy.
When pneumonia is suspected but imaging is unavailable, empiric antibiotics should be used in concordance with local and national guidelines. If imaging turns up negative, antibiotics should not be used. However, if there is no clinical or radiographic evidence of pneumonia, antibiotics should not be used routinely.
Finally, adult patients with acute cough and suspected influenza should begin antiviral treatment within 48 hours of the start of symptoms.
Pertussis
Pertussis has significant morbidity and mortality, with infants being particularly vulnerable, and it is highly contagious. Although antibiotics will not affect the course of the disease, they should be administered as quickly as possible in order to prevent further spread. This puts pressure on the clinician to make a treatment decision before further testing is available.
A prespecified meta-analysis found high sensitivity and low specificity for paroxysmal cough (sensitivity, 93.2%; specificity, 20.6%) and absence of fever (sensitivity, 81.8%; specificity, 18.8%). The study found low sensitivity and high specificity for inspiratory whoop (sensitivity, 29.8%; specificity, 79.5%) and posttussive vomiting (sensitivity, 32.5%; specificity, 77.7%). In children, the review found that posttussive vomiting was moderately sensitive (60.0%) and specific (66.0%).
In adult patients with acute cough (less than 3 weeks’ duration) or subacute cough (3-8 weeks), the new guidelines recommend that physicians consider four key characteristics: the presence of recurrent, prolonged coughing episodes with an inability to breathe during the spell (paroxysmal); posttussive vomiting; inspiratory whooping; and presence of fever.
In acute or subacute cough, if the patient has a fever (body temperature greater than 98.6° F or 37.6° C) or does not have a paroxysmal cough, pertussis is unlikely. On the other hand, posttussive vomiting or an associated inspiratory whooping sound suggests pertussis.
Children with a cough lasting fewer than 4 weeks (acute) should be assessed for paroxysmal cough, posttussive vomiting, and inspiratory whooping. A cough associated with any of these characteristics may be caused by pertussis.
SOURCES: Moore A et al. CHEST. 2019 Jan;155:147-154; Hill A et al. CHEST. 2019 Jan;155:155-167.
The CHEST Expert Cough Panel has released two new in adults and children.
Upper and lower respiratory tract infections are a common reason for primary care visits. A cough caused by influenza or pneumonia represents an opportunity to intervene for a significant benefit. The recommendations were published in CHEST®. The panel drafted recommendations based on available evidence and graded them using the CHEST grading system. The grading is based on the strength of the recommendation (either strong or weak) and a rating of the overall quality of the body of evidence. Where available evidence was weak, but guidance was still warranted, a weak suggestion was developed and graded 2C. Recommendations based on consensus in cases of insufficient clinical evidence are labeled “ungraded consensus-based statement.”
Suspected pneumonia or influenza
In adult outpatients with acute cough, the clinical signs of pneumonia include cough, dyspnea, pleural pain, sweating/fevers/shivers, aches and pains, temperature greater than or equal to 38°C, tachypnea, and new and localizing chest examination signs. When pneumonia is suspected to cause acute cough, C-reactive protein (CRP) should be measured. A CRP value higher than 30 mg/L bolsters the case for pneumonia, whereas a CRP value of lower than 10 mg/L, or between 10 mg/L and 50 mg/L in the absence of dyspnea and daily fever, makes pneumonia less likely.
The guidelines recommend against routine measurement of procalcitonin for outpatient adults suspected to have pneumonia. For adults with acute cough and abnormal vital signs believed to be secondary to pneumonia, the guidelines call for a chest x-ray.
Routine microbiological testing need not be performed in suspected pneumonia, but it should be considered if the results could guide or lead to a change in therapy.
When pneumonia is suspected but imaging is unavailable, empiric antibiotics should be used in concordance with local and national guidelines. If imaging turns up negative, antibiotics should not be used. However, if there is no clinical or radiographic evidence of pneumonia, antibiotics should not be used routinely.
Finally, adult patients with acute cough and suspected influenza should begin antiviral treatment within 48 hours of the start of symptoms.
Pertussis
Pertussis has significant morbidity and mortality, with infants being particularly vulnerable, and it is highly contagious. Although antibiotics will not affect the course of the disease, they should be administered as quickly as possible in order to prevent further spread. This puts pressure on the clinician to make a treatment decision before further testing is available.
A prespecified meta-analysis found high sensitivity and low specificity for paroxysmal cough (sensitivity, 93.2%; specificity, 20.6%) and absence of fever (sensitivity, 81.8%; specificity, 18.8%). The study found low sensitivity and high specificity for inspiratory whoop (sensitivity, 29.8%; specificity, 79.5%) and posttussive vomiting (sensitivity, 32.5%; specificity, 77.7%). In children, the review found that posttussive vomiting was moderately sensitive (60.0%) and specific (66.0%).
In adult patients with acute cough (less than 3 weeks’ duration) or subacute cough (3-8 weeks), the new guidelines recommend that physicians consider four key characteristics: the presence of recurrent, prolonged coughing episodes with an inability to breathe during the spell (paroxysmal); posttussive vomiting; inspiratory whooping; and presence of fever.
In acute or subacute cough, if the patient has a fever (body temperature greater than 98.6° F or 37.6° C) or does not have a paroxysmal cough, pertussis is unlikely. On the other hand, posttussive vomiting or an associated inspiratory whooping sound suggests pertussis.
Children with a cough lasting fewer than 4 weeks (acute) should be assessed for paroxysmal cough, posttussive vomiting, and inspiratory whooping. A cough associated with any of these characteristics may be caused by pertussis.
SOURCES: Moore A et al. CHEST. 2019 Jan;155:147-154; Hill A et al. CHEST. 2019 Jan;155:155-167.
The CHEST Expert Cough Panel has released two new in adults and children.
Upper and lower respiratory tract infections are a common reason for primary care visits. A cough caused by influenza or pneumonia represents an opportunity to intervene for a significant benefit. The recommendations were published in CHEST®. The panel drafted recommendations based on available evidence and graded them using the CHEST grading system. The grading is based on the strength of the recommendation (either strong or weak) and a rating of the overall quality of the body of evidence. Where available evidence was weak, but guidance was still warranted, a weak suggestion was developed and graded 2C. Recommendations based on consensus in cases of insufficient clinical evidence are labeled “ungraded consensus-based statement.”
Suspected pneumonia or influenza
In adult outpatients with acute cough, the clinical signs of pneumonia include cough, dyspnea, pleural pain, sweating/fevers/shivers, aches and pains, temperature greater than or equal to 38°C, tachypnea, and new and localizing chest examination signs. When pneumonia is suspected to cause acute cough, C-reactive protein (CRP) should be measured. A CRP value higher than 30 mg/L bolsters the case for pneumonia, whereas a CRP value of lower than 10 mg/L, or between 10 mg/L and 50 mg/L in the absence of dyspnea and daily fever, makes pneumonia less likely.
The guidelines recommend against routine measurement of procalcitonin for outpatient adults suspected to have pneumonia. For adults with acute cough and abnormal vital signs believed to be secondary to pneumonia, the guidelines call for a chest x-ray.
Routine microbiological testing need not be performed in suspected pneumonia, but it should be considered if the results could guide or lead to a change in therapy.
When pneumonia is suspected but imaging is unavailable, empiric antibiotics should be used in concordance with local and national guidelines. If imaging turns up negative, antibiotics should not be used. However, if there is no clinical or radiographic evidence of pneumonia, antibiotics should not be used routinely.
Finally, adult patients with acute cough and suspected influenza should begin antiviral treatment within 48 hours of the start of symptoms.
Pertussis
Pertussis has significant morbidity and mortality, with infants being particularly vulnerable, and it is highly contagious. Although antibiotics will not affect the course of the disease, they should be administered as quickly as possible in order to prevent further spread. This puts pressure on the clinician to make a treatment decision before further testing is available.
A prespecified meta-analysis found high sensitivity and low specificity for paroxysmal cough (sensitivity, 93.2%; specificity, 20.6%) and absence of fever (sensitivity, 81.8%; specificity, 18.8%). The study found low sensitivity and high specificity for inspiratory whoop (sensitivity, 29.8%; specificity, 79.5%) and posttussive vomiting (sensitivity, 32.5%; specificity, 77.7%). In children, the review found that posttussive vomiting was moderately sensitive (60.0%) and specific (66.0%).
In adult patients with acute cough (less than 3 weeks’ duration) or subacute cough (3-8 weeks), the new guidelines recommend that physicians consider four key characteristics: the presence of recurrent, prolonged coughing episodes with an inability to breathe during the spell (paroxysmal); posttussive vomiting; inspiratory whooping; and presence of fever.
In acute or subacute cough, if the patient has a fever (body temperature greater than 98.6° F or 37.6° C) or does not have a paroxysmal cough, pertussis is unlikely. On the other hand, posttussive vomiting or an associated inspiratory whooping sound suggests pertussis.
Children with a cough lasting fewer than 4 weeks (acute) should be assessed for paroxysmal cough, posttussive vomiting, and inspiratory whooping. A cough associated with any of these characteristics may be caused by pertussis.
SOURCES: Moore A et al. CHEST. 2019 Jan;155:147-154; Hill A et al. CHEST. 2019 Jan;155:155-167.
FROM THE JOURNAL CHEST®
LAIV4 was less effective for children than IIV against influenza A/H1N1pdm09
The live attenuated influenza vaccine was less effective against the influenza A/H1N1pdm09 virus in children and adolescents across multiple influenza seasons between 2013 and 2016, compared with the inactivated influenza vaccine, according to research published in the journal Pediatrics.
Jessie R. Chung, MPH, from the influenza division at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, and her colleagues performed an analysis of five different studies where vaccine effectiveness (VE) was examined for quadrivalent live attenuated vaccine (LAIV4) and inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) in children and adolescents aged 2-17 years from 42 states.
The analysis included data from the U.S. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network (6,793 patients), a study from the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (3,822 patients), the Influenza Clinical Investigation for Children (3,521 patients), Department of Defense Global, Laboratory-based, Influenza Surveillance Program (1,935 patients), and the Influenza Incidence Surveillance Project (1,102 patients) between the periods of 2013-2014 and 2015-2016. The researchers sourced current and previous season vaccination history from electronic medical records and immunization registries.
Of patients who were vaccinated across all seasons, there was 67% effectiveness against influenza A/H1N1pdm09 (95% confidence interval, 62%-72%) for those who received the IIV and 20% (95% CI, −6%-39%) for LAIV4. Among patients who received the LAIV4 vaccination, there was a significantly higher likelihood of developing influenza A/H1N1pdm09 (odds ratio, 2.66; 95% CI, 2.06-3.44) compared with patients who received the IIV vaccination.
With regard to other strains, there was similar effectiveness against influenza A/H3N2 and influenza B with LAIV4 and IIV vaccinations.
“In contrast to findings of reduced LAIV4 effectiveness against influenza A/H1N1pdm09 viruses, our results suggest a possible but nonsignificant benefit of LAIV4 over IIV against influenza B viruses, which has been described previously,” the investigators wrote.
Limitations of the study included having data only one season prior to enrollment and little available demographic information beyond age, gender, and geographic location.
The Influenza Clinical Investigation for Children was funded by MedImmune, a member of the AstraZeneca Group. Two of the researchers are employees of AstraZeneca. The other authors reported having no conflicts of interest. The U.S. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network was supported by the CDC through cooperative agreements with the University of Michigan, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, and Baylor Scott & White Health. At the University of Pittsburgh, the project also was supported by the National Institutes of Health.
SOURCE: Chung JR et al. Pediatrics. 2018. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2094.
There are many explanations for the decline in effectiveness of the live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4), but the data are complicated by conflicting information from studies outside the United States indicating “reasonable protection” against influenza A/H1N1pdm09, A/H3N2, and influenza B, compared with the inactivated influenza virus (IIV), Pedro A. Piedra, MD, wrote in an accompanying editorial.
In 2016, the World Health Organization met to discuss LAIV effectiveness and highlighted factors such as methodological study differences, inadequate vaccine handling at distribution centers, intrinsic virological differences of the A/H1N1pdm09 virus, and increased preexisting population immunity in the United States since 2010 as potential explanations. During the transition from LAIV3 to LAIV4 for the 2013-2014 influenza season, viral interference may have also occurred when the influenza B strain was introduced into the vaccine, he added.
According to the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), viral growth properties of A/H1N1pdm09 has improved in LAIV4, and viral shedding also has improved for children between 2 years and 4 years of age. Although effectiveness numbers were not available for the ACIP recommendation, an interim analysis from Public Health England for the 2017-2018 influenza season found a vaccine effectiveness of 90.3% (95% confidence interval, 16.4%-98.9%).
“This early result is encouraging and supports the reintroduction of LAIV4 in the United States as an option for the control of seasonal influenza,” he said. “It also highlights the need for annual influenza vaccine effectiveness estimates and the importance of the U.S. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network in providing updated information for ACIP recommendations.”
Dr. Piedra is from the departments of molecular virology and microbiology and pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston. He reports being a consultant for AstraZeneca, Sanofi Pasteur, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck Sharp and Dohme, and he has received travel support to present at an influenza seminar supported by Seqirus. His comments are from an editorial accompanying the article by Chung and colleagues ( Pediatrics. 2019. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018- 3290 ).
There are many explanations for the decline in effectiveness of the live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4), but the data are complicated by conflicting information from studies outside the United States indicating “reasonable protection” against influenza A/H1N1pdm09, A/H3N2, and influenza B, compared with the inactivated influenza virus (IIV), Pedro A. Piedra, MD, wrote in an accompanying editorial.
In 2016, the World Health Organization met to discuss LAIV effectiveness and highlighted factors such as methodological study differences, inadequate vaccine handling at distribution centers, intrinsic virological differences of the A/H1N1pdm09 virus, and increased preexisting population immunity in the United States since 2010 as potential explanations. During the transition from LAIV3 to LAIV4 for the 2013-2014 influenza season, viral interference may have also occurred when the influenza B strain was introduced into the vaccine, he added.
According to the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), viral growth properties of A/H1N1pdm09 has improved in LAIV4, and viral shedding also has improved for children between 2 years and 4 years of age. Although effectiveness numbers were not available for the ACIP recommendation, an interim analysis from Public Health England for the 2017-2018 influenza season found a vaccine effectiveness of 90.3% (95% confidence interval, 16.4%-98.9%).
“This early result is encouraging and supports the reintroduction of LAIV4 in the United States as an option for the control of seasonal influenza,” he said. “It also highlights the need for annual influenza vaccine effectiveness estimates and the importance of the U.S. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network in providing updated information for ACIP recommendations.”
Dr. Piedra is from the departments of molecular virology and microbiology and pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston. He reports being a consultant for AstraZeneca, Sanofi Pasteur, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck Sharp and Dohme, and he has received travel support to present at an influenza seminar supported by Seqirus. His comments are from an editorial accompanying the article by Chung and colleagues ( Pediatrics. 2019. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018- 3290 ).
There are many explanations for the decline in effectiveness of the live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4), but the data are complicated by conflicting information from studies outside the United States indicating “reasonable protection” against influenza A/H1N1pdm09, A/H3N2, and influenza B, compared with the inactivated influenza virus (IIV), Pedro A. Piedra, MD, wrote in an accompanying editorial.
In 2016, the World Health Organization met to discuss LAIV effectiveness and highlighted factors such as methodological study differences, inadequate vaccine handling at distribution centers, intrinsic virological differences of the A/H1N1pdm09 virus, and increased preexisting population immunity in the United States since 2010 as potential explanations. During the transition from LAIV3 to LAIV4 for the 2013-2014 influenza season, viral interference may have also occurred when the influenza B strain was introduced into the vaccine, he added.
According to the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), viral growth properties of A/H1N1pdm09 has improved in LAIV4, and viral shedding also has improved for children between 2 years and 4 years of age. Although effectiveness numbers were not available for the ACIP recommendation, an interim analysis from Public Health England for the 2017-2018 influenza season found a vaccine effectiveness of 90.3% (95% confidence interval, 16.4%-98.9%).
“This early result is encouraging and supports the reintroduction of LAIV4 in the United States as an option for the control of seasonal influenza,” he said. “It also highlights the need for annual influenza vaccine effectiveness estimates and the importance of the U.S. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network in providing updated information for ACIP recommendations.”
Dr. Piedra is from the departments of molecular virology and microbiology and pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston. He reports being a consultant for AstraZeneca, Sanofi Pasteur, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck Sharp and Dohme, and he has received travel support to present at an influenza seminar supported by Seqirus. His comments are from an editorial accompanying the article by Chung and colleagues ( Pediatrics. 2019. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018- 3290 ).
The live attenuated influenza vaccine was less effective against the influenza A/H1N1pdm09 virus in children and adolescents across multiple influenza seasons between 2013 and 2016, compared with the inactivated influenza vaccine, according to research published in the journal Pediatrics.
Jessie R. Chung, MPH, from the influenza division at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, and her colleagues performed an analysis of five different studies where vaccine effectiveness (VE) was examined for quadrivalent live attenuated vaccine (LAIV4) and inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) in children and adolescents aged 2-17 years from 42 states.
The analysis included data from the U.S. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network (6,793 patients), a study from the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (3,822 patients), the Influenza Clinical Investigation for Children (3,521 patients), Department of Defense Global, Laboratory-based, Influenza Surveillance Program (1,935 patients), and the Influenza Incidence Surveillance Project (1,102 patients) between the periods of 2013-2014 and 2015-2016. The researchers sourced current and previous season vaccination history from electronic medical records and immunization registries.
Of patients who were vaccinated across all seasons, there was 67% effectiveness against influenza A/H1N1pdm09 (95% confidence interval, 62%-72%) for those who received the IIV and 20% (95% CI, −6%-39%) for LAIV4. Among patients who received the LAIV4 vaccination, there was a significantly higher likelihood of developing influenza A/H1N1pdm09 (odds ratio, 2.66; 95% CI, 2.06-3.44) compared with patients who received the IIV vaccination.
With regard to other strains, there was similar effectiveness against influenza A/H3N2 and influenza B with LAIV4 and IIV vaccinations.
“In contrast to findings of reduced LAIV4 effectiveness against influenza A/H1N1pdm09 viruses, our results suggest a possible but nonsignificant benefit of LAIV4 over IIV against influenza B viruses, which has been described previously,” the investigators wrote.
Limitations of the study included having data only one season prior to enrollment and little available demographic information beyond age, gender, and geographic location.
The Influenza Clinical Investigation for Children was funded by MedImmune, a member of the AstraZeneca Group. Two of the researchers are employees of AstraZeneca. The other authors reported having no conflicts of interest. The U.S. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network was supported by the CDC through cooperative agreements with the University of Michigan, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, and Baylor Scott & White Health. At the University of Pittsburgh, the project also was supported by the National Institutes of Health.
SOURCE: Chung JR et al. Pediatrics. 2018. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2094.
The live attenuated influenza vaccine was less effective against the influenza A/H1N1pdm09 virus in children and adolescents across multiple influenza seasons between 2013 and 2016, compared with the inactivated influenza vaccine, according to research published in the journal Pediatrics.
Jessie R. Chung, MPH, from the influenza division at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, and her colleagues performed an analysis of five different studies where vaccine effectiveness (VE) was examined for quadrivalent live attenuated vaccine (LAIV4) and inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) in children and adolescents aged 2-17 years from 42 states.
The analysis included data from the U.S. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network (6,793 patients), a study from the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (3,822 patients), the Influenza Clinical Investigation for Children (3,521 patients), Department of Defense Global, Laboratory-based, Influenza Surveillance Program (1,935 patients), and the Influenza Incidence Surveillance Project (1,102 patients) between the periods of 2013-2014 and 2015-2016. The researchers sourced current and previous season vaccination history from electronic medical records and immunization registries.
Of patients who were vaccinated across all seasons, there was 67% effectiveness against influenza A/H1N1pdm09 (95% confidence interval, 62%-72%) for those who received the IIV and 20% (95% CI, −6%-39%) for LAIV4. Among patients who received the LAIV4 vaccination, there was a significantly higher likelihood of developing influenza A/H1N1pdm09 (odds ratio, 2.66; 95% CI, 2.06-3.44) compared with patients who received the IIV vaccination.
With regard to other strains, there was similar effectiveness against influenza A/H3N2 and influenza B with LAIV4 and IIV vaccinations.
“In contrast to findings of reduced LAIV4 effectiveness against influenza A/H1N1pdm09 viruses, our results suggest a possible but nonsignificant benefit of LAIV4 over IIV against influenza B viruses, which has been described previously,” the investigators wrote.
Limitations of the study included having data only one season prior to enrollment and little available demographic information beyond age, gender, and geographic location.
The Influenza Clinical Investigation for Children was funded by MedImmune, a member of the AstraZeneca Group. Two of the researchers are employees of AstraZeneca. The other authors reported having no conflicts of interest. The U.S. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network was supported by the CDC through cooperative agreements with the University of Michigan, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, and Baylor Scott & White Health. At the University of Pittsburgh, the project also was supported by the National Institutes of Health.
SOURCE: Chung JR et al. Pediatrics. 2018. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2094.
FROM PEDIATRICS
Key clinical point: The live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4) was significantly less effective than was the inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) for children against the influenza A/H1N1pdm09 virus across multiple flu seasons.
Major finding:
Study details: A combined analysis of five studies in the United States between the periods of 2013-2014 and 2015-2016 from the U.S. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network.
Disclosures: The Influenza Clinical Investigation for Children was funded by MedImmune, a member of the AstraZeneca Group. Two of the researchers are employees of AstraZeneca. The other authors reported having no conflicts of interest. The U.S. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network was supported by the CDC through cooperative agreements with the University of Michigan, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, and Baylor Scott & White Health. At the University of Pittsburgh, the project also was supported by the National Institutes of Health.
Source: Chung JR et al. Pediatrics. 2018. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2094.
Flu season intensifies: High activity now in 19 states
The effects of the flu became much more widespread in the last full week of 2018 as the number of states with a high level of influenza activity more than doubled from the week before, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
A total of 19 states were in the high range (8-10) on the CDC’s 1-10 scale of influenza-like illness (ILI) activity for the week ending Dec. 29, compared with 9 states the week before, the CDC’s influenza division reported Jan. 4. Of those 19 most-affected states, 12 were at level 10, 1 was at level 9, and 6 were at level 8. Geographic distribution of the virus was reported to be widespread in 24 states, the CDC said.
The proportion of outpatient visits for ILI – defined as fever (temperature of 100° F or greater) and cough and/or sore throat – rose to 4.1% for the week, which was up from 3.3% the previous week and well above the national baseline of 2.2%.
“The increase in the percentage of patient visits for ILI may be influenced in part by a reduction in routine health care visits during the winter holidays,” the report noted. There were 38 influenza deaths reported for the most recent week with available data (the week ending Dec. 22), although reporting for that week was just over 54% complete as of Jan. 4. For the previous weeks, 39 flu-related deaths occurred during the week ending Dec. 15 (reporting 84% complete) and 43 deaths during the week ending Dec. 8 (reporting 94% complete). For the respective weeks of last year’s flu season, total deaths were 359, 165, and 118, CDC data show.
For the week ending Dec. 29, two pediatric deaths were reported, one of which occurred the week before. For the 2018-2019 season so far, 13 flu-related pediatric deaths have been reported, the CDC said.
The effects of the flu became much more widespread in the last full week of 2018 as the number of states with a high level of influenza activity more than doubled from the week before, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
A total of 19 states were in the high range (8-10) on the CDC’s 1-10 scale of influenza-like illness (ILI) activity for the week ending Dec. 29, compared with 9 states the week before, the CDC’s influenza division reported Jan. 4. Of those 19 most-affected states, 12 were at level 10, 1 was at level 9, and 6 were at level 8. Geographic distribution of the virus was reported to be widespread in 24 states, the CDC said.
The proportion of outpatient visits for ILI – defined as fever (temperature of 100° F or greater) and cough and/or sore throat – rose to 4.1% for the week, which was up from 3.3% the previous week and well above the national baseline of 2.2%.
“The increase in the percentage of patient visits for ILI may be influenced in part by a reduction in routine health care visits during the winter holidays,” the report noted. There were 38 influenza deaths reported for the most recent week with available data (the week ending Dec. 22), although reporting for that week was just over 54% complete as of Jan. 4. For the previous weeks, 39 flu-related deaths occurred during the week ending Dec. 15 (reporting 84% complete) and 43 deaths during the week ending Dec. 8 (reporting 94% complete). For the respective weeks of last year’s flu season, total deaths were 359, 165, and 118, CDC data show.
For the week ending Dec. 29, two pediatric deaths were reported, one of which occurred the week before. For the 2018-2019 season so far, 13 flu-related pediatric deaths have been reported, the CDC said.
The effects of the flu became much more widespread in the last full week of 2018 as the number of states with a high level of influenza activity more than doubled from the week before, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
A total of 19 states were in the high range (8-10) on the CDC’s 1-10 scale of influenza-like illness (ILI) activity for the week ending Dec. 29, compared with 9 states the week before, the CDC’s influenza division reported Jan. 4. Of those 19 most-affected states, 12 were at level 10, 1 was at level 9, and 6 were at level 8. Geographic distribution of the virus was reported to be widespread in 24 states, the CDC said.
The proportion of outpatient visits for ILI – defined as fever (temperature of 100° F or greater) and cough and/or sore throat – rose to 4.1% for the week, which was up from 3.3% the previous week and well above the national baseline of 2.2%.
“The increase in the percentage of patient visits for ILI may be influenced in part by a reduction in routine health care visits during the winter holidays,” the report noted. There were 38 influenza deaths reported for the most recent week with available data (the week ending Dec. 22), although reporting for that week was just over 54% complete as of Jan. 4. For the previous weeks, 39 flu-related deaths occurred during the week ending Dec. 15 (reporting 84% complete) and 43 deaths during the week ending Dec. 8 (reporting 94% complete). For the respective weeks of last year’s flu season, total deaths were 359, 165, and 118, CDC data show.
For the week ending Dec. 29, two pediatric deaths were reported, one of which occurred the week before. For the 2018-2019 season so far, 13 flu-related pediatric deaths have been reported, the CDC said.
Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program may be doing more harm than good
A Medicare program aimed at lowering readmissions to hospitals could be having an adverse effect on mortality.
Results from a retrospective cohort study of hospitalizations for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, and pneumonia among Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older between April 1, 2005 and March 31, 2015 (covering the period before and after the Medicare Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program was announced in April 2010 and implemented in October 2012) found a significant increase in 30-day post discharge mortality among heart failure and pneumonia patients.
“Most concerning, however, is the possibility that the relationship between the HRRP and postdischarge mortality for heart failure and pneumonia is causal, indicating that the HRRP led to changes in quality of care that adversely affected patients,” Rishi Wadhera, MD, Harvard Medical School, Boston, and his colleagues wrote in a report published Dec. 25, 2018, in JAMA.
They looked at 8.3 million hospitalizations for heart failure, acute MI, and pneumonia, among whom 7.9 million were alive at the time of discharge. There were roughly 270,000 deaths within 30 days of discharge for heart failure; 128,000 for acute MI; and 246,000 for pneumonia.
To examine trends, the timing was divided into four periods: two prior to the announcement of the HRRP (April 2005–September 2007 and October 2007–March 2010); a third covering the time when the HRRP was announced (April 2010–September 2012); and the fourth when HRRP was implemented (October 2012–March 2015).
They found that among patients discharged with heart failure, 30-day mortality was rising even before the announcement of the HRRP, by 0.27% from the first period to the second period. That baseline trend continued when the HRRP was announced, by 0.49%, from second period to third. The difference in change between those periods was 0.22%. After implementation, 30-day mortality increased by 0.52%, with a difference in change from the third period of 0.25%. Both changes were statistically significant.
Among pneumonia patients, postdischarge mortality was stable before HRRP, but significantly increased after HRRP announcement, by 0.26%, with a difference in change from the second period to the third period of 0.22%. After implementation, the 30-day postdischarge mortality was 0.44%, with a significant difference in change of 0.40%.
Acute MI was a different story. Postdischarge mortality decreased significantly after the implementation of the HRRP, by 0.22%. The difference in change was –0.26%.
The authors suggested that “some hospitals may have focused more resources and efforts on reducing or avoiding readmissions than on prioritizing survival.” They add that the increases in heart failure morbidity could be related to patients with more severe heart conditions.
They noted that “although hospitals that reduce readmissions also appear to reduce mortality, this hospital-level concordance does not reflect the change in readmissions and mortality at the level of the patient population, which is arguably of greater importance to individual patients and to public health.”
Further research is needed to understand whether the increase in 30-day postdischarge mortality is a result of the HRRP, the authors concluded.
SOURCE: Wadhera R et al. JAMA. 2018 Dec 25. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19232.
Evidence in this study shows that while the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program my be succeeding in reducing hospital admissions, little evidence is available to show that it is having a positive effect on patient outcomes.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services needs to reexamine the program and find alternative methods that are both effective at reducing hospital readmissions while at the same time protect patients from unintentional harm, including death.
Gregg C. Fonarow, MD , University of California Medical Center, Los Angeles, in an editorial published in JAMA, Dec. 25, 2018. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.19325 .
Evidence in this study shows that while the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program my be succeeding in reducing hospital admissions, little evidence is available to show that it is having a positive effect on patient outcomes.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services needs to reexamine the program and find alternative methods that are both effective at reducing hospital readmissions while at the same time protect patients from unintentional harm, including death.
Gregg C. Fonarow, MD , University of California Medical Center, Los Angeles, in an editorial published in JAMA, Dec. 25, 2018. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.19325 .
Evidence in this study shows that while the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program my be succeeding in reducing hospital admissions, little evidence is available to show that it is having a positive effect on patient outcomes.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services needs to reexamine the program and find alternative methods that are both effective at reducing hospital readmissions while at the same time protect patients from unintentional harm, including death.
Gregg C. Fonarow, MD , University of California Medical Center, Los Angeles, in an editorial published in JAMA, Dec. 25, 2018. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.19325 .
A Medicare program aimed at lowering readmissions to hospitals could be having an adverse effect on mortality.
Results from a retrospective cohort study of hospitalizations for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, and pneumonia among Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older between April 1, 2005 and March 31, 2015 (covering the period before and after the Medicare Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program was announced in April 2010 and implemented in October 2012) found a significant increase in 30-day post discharge mortality among heart failure and pneumonia patients.
“Most concerning, however, is the possibility that the relationship between the HRRP and postdischarge mortality for heart failure and pneumonia is causal, indicating that the HRRP led to changes in quality of care that adversely affected patients,” Rishi Wadhera, MD, Harvard Medical School, Boston, and his colleagues wrote in a report published Dec. 25, 2018, in JAMA.
They looked at 8.3 million hospitalizations for heart failure, acute MI, and pneumonia, among whom 7.9 million were alive at the time of discharge. There were roughly 270,000 deaths within 30 days of discharge for heart failure; 128,000 for acute MI; and 246,000 for pneumonia.
To examine trends, the timing was divided into four periods: two prior to the announcement of the HRRP (April 2005–September 2007 and October 2007–March 2010); a third covering the time when the HRRP was announced (April 2010–September 2012); and the fourth when HRRP was implemented (October 2012–March 2015).
They found that among patients discharged with heart failure, 30-day mortality was rising even before the announcement of the HRRP, by 0.27% from the first period to the second period. That baseline trend continued when the HRRP was announced, by 0.49%, from second period to third. The difference in change between those periods was 0.22%. After implementation, 30-day mortality increased by 0.52%, with a difference in change from the third period of 0.25%. Both changes were statistically significant.
Among pneumonia patients, postdischarge mortality was stable before HRRP, but significantly increased after HRRP announcement, by 0.26%, with a difference in change from the second period to the third period of 0.22%. After implementation, the 30-day postdischarge mortality was 0.44%, with a significant difference in change of 0.40%.
Acute MI was a different story. Postdischarge mortality decreased significantly after the implementation of the HRRP, by 0.22%. The difference in change was –0.26%.
The authors suggested that “some hospitals may have focused more resources and efforts on reducing or avoiding readmissions than on prioritizing survival.” They add that the increases in heart failure morbidity could be related to patients with more severe heart conditions.
They noted that “although hospitals that reduce readmissions also appear to reduce mortality, this hospital-level concordance does not reflect the change in readmissions and mortality at the level of the patient population, which is arguably of greater importance to individual patients and to public health.”
Further research is needed to understand whether the increase in 30-day postdischarge mortality is a result of the HRRP, the authors concluded.
SOURCE: Wadhera R et al. JAMA. 2018 Dec 25. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19232.
A Medicare program aimed at lowering readmissions to hospitals could be having an adverse effect on mortality.
Results from a retrospective cohort study of hospitalizations for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, and pneumonia among Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older between April 1, 2005 and March 31, 2015 (covering the period before and after the Medicare Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program was announced in April 2010 and implemented in October 2012) found a significant increase in 30-day post discharge mortality among heart failure and pneumonia patients.
“Most concerning, however, is the possibility that the relationship between the HRRP and postdischarge mortality for heart failure and pneumonia is causal, indicating that the HRRP led to changes in quality of care that adversely affected patients,” Rishi Wadhera, MD, Harvard Medical School, Boston, and his colleagues wrote in a report published Dec. 25, 2018, in JAMA.
They looked at 8.3 million hospitalizations for heart failure, acute MI, and pneumonia, among whom 7.9 million were alive at the time of discharge. There were roughly 270,000 deaths within 30 days of discharge for heart failure; 128,000 for acute MI; and 246,000 for pneumonia.
To examine trends, the timing was divided into four periods: two prior to the announcement of the HRRP (April 2005–September 2007 and October 2007–March 2010); a third covering the time when the HRRP was announced (April 2010–September 2012); and the fourth when HRRP was implemented (October 2012–March 2015).
They found that among patients discharged with heart failure, 30-day mortality was rising even before the announcement of the HRRP, by 0.27% from the first period to the second period. That baseline trend continued when the HRRP was announced, by 0.49%, from second period to third. The difference in change between those periods was 0.22%. After implementation, 30-day mortality increased by 0.52%, with a difference in change from the third period of 0.25%. Both changes were statistically significant.
Among pneumonia patients, postdischarge mortality was stable before HRRP, but significantly increased after HRRP announcement, by 0.26%, with a difference in change from the second period to the third period of 0.22%. After implementation, the 30-day postdischarge mortality was 0.44%, with a significant difference in change of 0.40%.
Acute MI was a different story. Postdischarge mortality decreased significantly after the implementation of the HRRP, by 0.22%. The difference in change was –0.26%.
The authors suggested that “some hospitals may have focused more resources and efforts on reducing or avoiding readmissions than on prioritizing survival.” They add that the increases in heart failure morbidity could be related to patients with more severe heart conditions.
They noted that “although hospitals that reduce readmissions also appear to reduce mortality, this hospital-level concordance does not reflect the change in readmissions and mortality at the level of the patient population, which is arguably of greater importance to individual patients and to public health.”
Further research is needed to understand whether the increase in 30-day postdischarge mortality is a result of the HRRP, the authors concluded.
SOURCE: Wadhera R et al. JAMA. 2018 Dec 25. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19232.
FROM JAMA
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Heart failure patients saw mortality increase 0.52% after HRRP launched.
Study details: A retrospective cohort study across 10 years, including time before and after the implementation of the HRRP.
Disclosures: The Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology funded the study. No relevant conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Source: Wadhera R et al. JAMA 2018 Dec 25. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19232.
Biomarkers predict asthma/COPD risk in 9/11 first responders
Elevated eosinophil levels and interleukin-4 (IL-4) levels were significantly associated with an increased risk of overlapping asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in firefighters exposed to toxins at the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001.
Patients with asthma/COPD overlap experience decreased quality of life and increased mortality, compared with patients who have either isolated COPD or isolated asthma, and longitudinal data on risk factors for the overlapping condition are lacking, wrote Ankura Singh, MPH, of Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, and colleagues.
In a study published in CHEST, the researchers reviewed data from 2,137 firefighters exposed to toxins at the World Trade Center on 9/11. The study participants underwent a bronchodilator pulmonary function test between Sept. 9, 2001, and Sept. 10, 2017, and at least three routine monitoring pulmonary function tests between these two dates.
In a multivariate analysis, eosinophil concentration of at least 300 cells/mcL was a significant predictor of asthma/COPD overlap. Serum IL-4 levels also were significant predictors of asthma/COPD overlap (hazard ratio, 1.51).
In addition, a greater concentration of IL-21 was associated with both isolated asthma and isolated COPD, but not with the overlap.
The study results were strengthened by the availability of pre-exposure medical data for the firefighters and the close follow-up, although limitations included the mostly white male population and a limited definition of asthma, the researchers noted.
However, the findings suggest that “high eosinophil concentrations, uniquely associated with asthma/COPD overlap in this population, may reflect biological pathways that predispose one to exaggerated inflammation and/or poor counterregulatory responses to inflammation, leading to reversible and fixed airflow obstruction,” they wrote. Consequently, early interventions targeting specific inflammatory pathways may improve lung function outcomes.
The study was supported in part by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health and the National Institutes of Health.
SOURCE: Singh A et al. CHEST. 2018 Dec;154;1301-10.
Elevated eosinophil levels and interleukin-4 (IL-4) levels were significantly associated with an increased risk of overlapping asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in firefighters exposed to toxins at the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001.
Patients with asthma/COPD overlap experience decreased quality of life and increased mortality, compared with patients who have either isolated COPD or isolated asthma, and longitudinal data on risk factors for the overlapping condition are lacking, wrote Ankura Singh, MPH, of Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, and colleagues.
In a study published in CHEST, the researchers reviewed data from 2,137 firefighters exposed to toxins at the World Trade Center on 9/11. The study participants underwent a bronchodilator pulmonary function test between Sept. 9, 2001, and Sept. 10, 2017, and at least three routine monitoring pulmonary function tests between these two dates.
In a multivariate analysis, eosinophil concentration of at least 300 cells/mcL was a significant predictor of asthma/COPD overlap. Serum IL-4 levels also were significant predictors of asthma/COPD overlap (hazard ratio, 1.51).
In addition, a greater concentration of IL-21 was associated with both isolated asthma and isolated COPD, but not with the overlap.
The study results were strengthened by the availability of pre-exposure medical data for the firefighters and the close follow-up, although limitations included the mostly white male population and a limited definition of asthma, the researchers noted.
However, the findings suggest that “high eosinophil concentrations, uniquely associated with asthma/COPD overlap in this population, may reflect biological pathways that predispose one to exaggerated inflammation and/or poor counterregulatory responses to inflammation, leading to reversible and fixed airflow obstruction,” they wrote. Consequently, early interventions targeting specific inflammatory pathways may improve lung function outcomes.
The study was supported in part by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health and the National Institutes of Health.
SOURCE: Singh A et al. CHEST. 2018 Dec;154;1301-10.
Elevated eosinophil levels and interleukin-4 (IL-4) levels were significantly associated with an increased risk of overlapping asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in firefighters exposed to toxins at the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001.
Patients with asthma/COPD overlap experience decreased quality of life and increased mortality, compared with patients who have either isolated COPD or isolated asthma, and longitudinal data on risk factors for the overlapping condition are lacking, wrote Ankura Singh, MPH, of Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, and colleagues.
In a study published in CHEST, the researchers reviewed data from 2,137 firefighters exposed to toxins at the World Trade Center on 9/11. The study participants underwent a bronchodilator pulmonary function test between Sept. 9, 2001, and Sept. 10, 2017, and at least three routine monitoring pulmonary function tests between these two dates.
In a multivariate analysis, eosinophil concentration of at least 300 cells/mcL was a significant predictor of asthma/COPD overlap. Serum IL-4 levels also were significant predictors of asthma/COPD overlap (hazard ratio, 1.51).
In addition, a greater concentration of IL-21 was associated with both isolated asthma and isolated COPD, but not with the overlap.
The study results were strengthened by the availability of pre-exposure medical data for the firefighters and the close follow-up, although limitations included the mostly white male population and a limited definition of asthma, the researchers noted.
However, the findings suggest that “high eosinophil concentrations, uniquely associated with asthma/COPD overlap in this population, may reflect biological pathways that predispose one to exaggerated inflammation and/or poor counterregulatory responses to inflammation, leading to reversible and fixed airflow obstruction,” they wrote. Consequently, early interventions targeting specific inflammatory pathways may improve lung function outcomes.
The study was supported in part by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health and the National Institutes of Health.
SOURCE: Singh A et al. CHEST. 2018 Dec;154;1301-10.
FROM CHEST
Key clinical point: Firefighters exposed to toxins at the World Trade Center on 9/11 who demonstrated elevated blood eosinophils and IL-4 levels were at increased risk for subsequent asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap.
Major finding: Increased eosinophils (300 cells/mcL or higher) was significantly associated with asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap (hazard ratio, 1.85).
Study details: The data come from 2,137 firefighters exposed to toxins at the World Trade Center in New York on 9/11.
Disclosures: The study was supported in part by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health and the National Institutes of Health.
Source: Singh A et al. CHEST. 2018 Dec; 154;1301-10.
CDC: Flu activity ‘high’ in nine states
according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Patients with ILI made up an estimated 3.3% of outpatient visits for the week, which is up from 2.7% the previous week and well above the baseline rate of 2.2%, which the 2018-2019 flu season has now exceeded for the past 3 weeks, the CDC reported Dec. 28. ILI is defined “as fever (temperature of 100°F [37.8°C] or greater) and cough and/or sore throat.”
Three states – Colorado, Georgia, and New Mexico – are now at the highest level of flu activity on the CDC’s 1-10 scale, and nine states are in the “high” range (8-10), compared with two states in high range (both at level 10) for the week ending Dec. 15. Another seven states and Puerto Rico are now in the “moderate” range of 6-7, data from the CDC’s Outpatient ILI Surveillance Network show.
Four flu-related deaths in children were reported during the week ending Dec. 22, two of which occurred in previous weeks, which brings the total to 11 for the 2018-2019 season, the CDC reported.
according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Patients with ILI made up an estimated 3.3% of outpatient visits for the week, which is up from 2.7% the previous week and well above the baseline rate of 2.2%, which the 2018-2019 flu season has now exceeded for the past 3 weeks, the CDC reported Dec. 28. ILI is defined “as fever (temperature of 100°F [37.8°C] or greater) and cough and/or sore throat.”
Three states – Colorado, Georgia, and New Mexico – are now at the highest level of flu activity on the CDC’s 1-10 scale, and nine states are in the “high” range (8-10), compared with two states in high range (both at level 10) for the week ending Dec. 15. Another seven states and Puerto Rico are now in the “moderate” range of 6-7, data from the CDC’s Outpatient ILI Surveillance Network show.
Four flu-related deaths in children were reported during the week ending Dec. 22, two of which occurred in previous weeks, which brings the total to 11 for the 2018-2019 season, the CDC reported.
according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Patients with ILI made up an estimated 3.3% of outpatient visits for the week, which is up from 2.7% the previous week and well above the baseline rate of 2.2%, which the 2018-2019 flu season has now exceeded for the past 3 weeks, the CDC reported Dec. 28. ILI is defined “as fever (temperature of 100°F [37.8°C] or greater) and cough and/or sore throat.”
Three states – Colorado, Georgia, and New Mexico – are now at the highest level of flu activity on the CDC’s 1-10 scale, and nine states are in the “high” range (8-10), compared with two states in high range (both at level 10) for the week ending Dec. 15. Another seven states and Puerto Rico are now in the “moderate” range of 6-7, data from the CDC’s Outpatient ILI Surveillance Network show.
Four flu-related deaths in children were reported during the week ending Dec. 22, two of which occurred in previous weeks, which brings the total to 11 for the 2018-2019 season, the CDC reported.
Guideline-concordant treatment still unlikely in nonchildren’s hospitals for pediatric CAP
according to new research.
“This gap is concerning because approximately 70% of children hospitalized with pneumonia receive care in nonchildren’s hospitals,” wrote Alison C. Tribble, MD, of C. S. Mott Children’s Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and her associates. The report is in JAMA Pediatrics.
Data were collected from the Pediatric Health Information System (children’s hospitals) and Premier Perspectives (all hospitals) databases and included a total of 120,238 children aged 1-17 years diagnosed with CAP between Jan. 1, 2009, and Sept. 30, 2015. Before the publication of the new guideline in October 2011, the probability of receiving what would become guideline-concordant antibiotics was 0.25 in children’s hospitals and 0.06 in nonchildren’s hospitals.
By the end of the study period, the probability of receiving guideline-concordant antibiotics for pediatric CAP was 0.61 in children’s hospitals and 0.27 in nonchildren’s hospitals. Without the interventions, the probabilities would have been 0.31 and 0.08, respectively. The rate of growth over the 4-year postintervention period was similar in both children’s and nonchildren’s hospitals.
“Studies in children’s hospitals have suggested that local implementation efforts may be important in facilitating guideline uptake. Nonchildren’s hospitals likely have fewer resources to lead pediatric-specific efforts, and care may be influenced by adult CAP guidelines,” the authors noted.
No conflicts of interest were reported.
SOURCE: Tribble AC et al. JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Dec 10. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4270.
according to new research.
“This gap is concerning because approximately 70% of children hospitalized with pneumonia receive care in nonchildren’s hospitals,” wrote Alison C. Tribble, MD, of C. S. Mott Children’s Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and her associates. The report is in JAMA Pediatrics.
Data were collected from the Pediatric Health Information System (children’s hospitals) and Premier Perspectives (all hospitals) databases and included a total of 120,238 children aged 1-17 years diagnosed with CAP between Jan. 1, 2009, and Sept. 30, 2015. Before the publication of the new guideline in October 2011, the probability of receiving what would become guideline-concordant antibiotics was 0.25 in children’s hospitals and 0.06 in nonchildren’s hospitals.
By the end of the study period, the probability of receiving guideline-concordant antibiotics for pediatric CAP was 0.61 in children’s hospitals and 0.27 in nonchildren’s hospitals. Without the interventions, the probabilities would have been 0.31 and 0.08, respectively. The rate of growth over the 4-year postintervention period was similar in both children’s and nonchildren’s hospitals.
“Studies in children’s hospitals have suggested that local implementation efforts may be important in facilitating guideline uptake. Nonchildren’s hospitals likely have fewer resources to lead pediatric-specific efforts, and care may be influenced by adult CAP guidelines,” the authors noted.
No conflicts of interest were reported.
SOURCE: Tribble AC et al. JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Dec 10. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4270.
according to new research.
“This gap is concerning because approximately 70% of children hospitalized with pneumonia receive care in nonchildren’s hospitals,” wrote Alison C. Tribble, MD, of C. S. Mott Children’s Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and her associates. The report is in JAMA Pediatrics.
Data were collected from the Pediatric Health Information System (children’s hospitals) and Premier Perspectives (all hospitals) databases and included a total of 120,238 children aged 1-17 years diagnosed with CAP between Jan. 1, 2009, and Sept. 30, 2015. Before the publication of the new guideline in October 2011, the probability of receiving what would become guideline-concordant antibiotics was 0.25 in children’s hospitals and 0.06 in nonchildren’s hospitals.
By the end of the study period, the probability of receiving guideline-concordant antibiotics for pediatric CAP was 0.61 in children’s hospitals and 0.27 in nonchildren’s hospitals. Without the interventions, the probabilities would have been 0.31 and 0.08, respectively. The rate of growth over the 4-year postintervention period was similar in both children’s and nonchildren’s hospitals.
“Studies in children’s hospitals have suggested that local implementation efforts may be important in facilitating guideline uptake. Nonchildren’s hospitals likely have fewer resources to lead pediatric-specific efforts, and care may be influenced by adult CAP guidelines,” the authors noted.
No conflicts of interest were reported.
SOURCE: Tribble AC et al. JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Dec 10. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4270.
FROM JAMA PEDIATRICS
Pregnant women commonly refuse the influenza vaccine
Pregnant women commonly refuse vaccines, and refusal of influenza vaccine is more common than refusal of Tdap vaccine, according to a nationally representative survey of obstetrician/gynecologists.
“It appears vaccine refusal among pregnant women may be more common than parental refusal of childhood vaccines,” Sean T. O’Leary, MD, MPH, director of the Colorado Children’s Outcomes Network at the University of Colorado in Aurora, and his coauthors wrote in Obstetrics & Gynecology.
The survey was sent to 477 ob.gyns. via both email and mail between March and June 2016. The response rate was 69%, and almost all respondents reported recommending both influenza (97%) and Tdap (95%) vaccines to pregnant women.
However, respondents also reported that refusal of both vaccines was common, with more refusals of influenza vaccine than Tdap vaccine. Of ob.gyns. who responded, 62% reported that 10% or greater of their pregnant patients refused the influenza vaccine, compared with 32% reporting this for Tdap vaccine (P greater than .001; x2, less than 10% vs. 10% or greater). Of those refusing the vaccine, 48% believed influenza vaccine would make them sick; 38% felt they were unlikely to get a vaccine-preventable disease; and 32% had general worries about vaccines overall. In addition, the only strategy perceived as “very effective” in convincing a vaccine refuser to choose otherwise was “explaining that not getting the vaccine puts the fetus or newborn at risk.”
The authors shared potential limitations of their study, including the fact that they examined reported practices and perceptions, not observed practices, along with the potential that the attitudes and practices of respondents may differ from those of nonrespondents. However, they noted that this is unlikely given prior work and that next steps should consider responses to refusal while also sympathizing with the patients’ concerns. “Future work should focus on testing evidence-based strategies for addressing vaccine refusal in the obstetric setting and understanding how the unique concerns of pregnant women influence the effectiveness of such strategies,” they wrote.
The study was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. No conflicts of interest were reported.
SOURCE: O’Leary ST et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003005.
Pregnant women make up 1% of the population but accounted for 5% of all influenza deaths during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, which makes the common vaccine refusals reported by the nation’s ob.gyns. all the more serious, according to Sonja A. Rasmussen, MD, MS, of the University of Florida in Gainesville and Denise J. Jamieson, MD, MPH, of Emory University in Atlanta.
After the 2009 pandemic, vaccination coverage for pregnant woman during flu season leapt from less than 30% to 54%, according to data from a 2016-2017 Internet panel survey. This was in large part because of the committed work of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, who emphasized the importance of the influenza vaccine. But coverage rates have stagnated since then, and these two coauthors wrote that “the 2017-2018 severe influenza season was a stern reminder that influenza should not be underestimated.”
These last 2 years saw the highest-documented rate of hospitalizations for influenza since 2005-2006, but given that there’s been very little specific information available on hospitalizations of pregnant women, Dr. Rasmussen and Dr. Jamieson fear the onset of “complacency among health care providers, pregnant women, and the general public” when it comes to the effects of influenza.
They insisted that, as 2009 drifts even further into memory, “obstetric providers should not become complacent regarding influenza.” Strategies to improve coverage are necessary to break that 50% barrier, and “pregnant women and their infants deserve our best efforts to protect them from influenza.”
These comments are adapted from an accompanying editorial (Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003040). No conflicts of interest were reported.
Pregnant women make up 1% of the population but accounted for 5% of all influenza deaths during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, which makes the common vaccine refusals reported by the nation’s ob.gyns. all the more serious, according to Sonja A. Rasmussen, MD, MS, of the University of Florida in Gainesville and Denise J. Jamieson, MD, MPH, of Emory University in Atlanta.
After the 2009 pandemic, vaccination coverage for pregnant woman during flu season leapt from less than 30% to 54%, according to data from a 2016-2017 Internet panel survey. This was in large part because of the committed work of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, who emphasized the importance of the influenza vaccine. But coverage rates have stagnated since then, and these two coauthors wrote that “the 2017-2018 severe influenza season was a stern reminder that influenza should not be underestimated.”
These last 2 years saw the highest-documented rate of hospitalizations for influenza since 2005-2006, but given that there’s been very little specific information available on hospitalizations of pregnant women, Dr. Rasmussen and Dr. Jamieson fear the onset of “complacency among health care providers, pregnant women, and the general public” when it comes to the effects of influenza.
They insisted that, as 2009 drifts even further into memory, “obstetric providers should not become complacent regarding influenza.” Strategies to improve coverage are necessary to break that 50% barrier, and “pregnant women and their infants deserve our best efforts to protect them from influenza.”
These comments are adapted from an accompanying editorial (Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003040). No conflicts of interest were reported.
Pregnant women make up 1% of the population but accounted for 5% of all influenza deaths during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, which makes the common vaccine refusals reported by the nation’s ob.gyns. all the more serious, according to Sonja A. Rasmussen, MD, MS, of the University of Florida in Gainesville and Denise J. Jamieson, MD, MPH, of Emory University in Atlanta.
After the 2009 pandemic, vaccination coverage for pregnant woman during flu season leapt from less than 30% to 54%, according to data from a 2016-2017 Internet panel survey. This was in large part because of the committed work of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, who emphasized the importance of the influenza vaccine. But coverage rates have stagnated since then, and these two coauthors wrote that “the 2017-2018 severe influenza season was a stern reminder that influenza should not be underestimated.”
These last 2 years saw the highest-documented rate of hospitalizations for influenza since 2005-2006, but given that there’s been very little specific information available on hospitalizations of pregnant women, Dr. Rasmussen and Dr. Jamieson fear the onset of “complacency among health care providers, pregnant women, and the general public” when it comes to the effects of influenza.
They insisted that, as 2009 drifts even further into memory, “obstetric providers should not become complacent regarding influenza.” Strategies to improve coverage are necessary to break that 50% barrier, and “pregnant women and their infants deserve our best efforts to protect them from influenza.”
These comments are adapted from an accompanying editorial (Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003040). No conflicts of interest were reported.
Pregnant women commonly refuse vaccines, and refusal of influenza vaccine is more common than refusal of Tdap vaccine, according to a nationally representative survey of obstetrician/gynecologists.
“It appears vaccine refusal among pregnant women may be more common than parental refusal of childhood vaccines,” Sean T. O’Leary, MD, MPH, director of the Colorado Children’s Outcomes Network at the University of Colorado in Aurora, and his coauthors wrote in Obstetrics & Gynecology.
The survey was sent to 477 ob.gyns. via both email and mail between March and June 2016. The response rate was 69%, and almost all respondents reported recommending both influenza (97%) and Tdap (95%) vaccines to pregnant women.
However, respondents also reported that refusal of both vaccines was common, with more refusals of influenza vaccine than Tdap vaccine. Of ob.gyns. who responded, 62% reported that 10% or greater of their pregnant patients refused the influenza vaccine, compared with 32% reporting this for Tdap vaccine (P greater than .001; x2, less than 10% vs. 10% or greater). Of those refusing the vaccine, 48% believed influenza vaccine would make them sick; 38% felt they were unlikely to get a vaccine-preventable disease; and 32% had general worries about vaccines overall. In addition, the only strategy perceived as “very effective” in convincing a vaccine refuser to choose otherwise was “explaining that not getting the vaccine puts the fetus or newborn at risk.”
The authors shared potential limitations of their study, including the fact that they examined reported practices and perceptions, not observed practices, along with the potential that the attitudes and practices of respondents may differ from those of nonrespondents. However, they noted that this is unlikely given prior work and that next steps should consider responses to refusal while also sympathizing with the patients’ concerns. “Future work should focus on testing evidence-based strategies for addressing vaccine refusal in the obstetric setting and understanding how the unique concerns of pregnant women influence the effectiveness of such strategies,” they wrote.
The study was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. No conflicts of interest were reported.
SOURCE: O’Leary ST et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003005.
Pregnant women commonly refuse vaccines, and refusal of influenza vaccine is more common than refusal of Tdap vaccine, according to a nationally representative survey of obstetrician/gynecologists.
“It appears vaccine refusal among pregnant women may be more common than parental refusal of childhood vaccines,” Sean T. O’Leary, MD, MPH, director of the Colorado Children’s Outcomes Network at the University of Colorado in Aurora, and his coauthors wrote in Obstetrics & Gynecology.
The survey was sent to 477 ob.gyns. via both email and mail between March and June 2016. The response rate was 69%, and almost all respondents reported recommending both influenza (97%) and Tdap (95%) vaccines to pregnant women.
However, respondents also reported that refusal of both vaccines was common, with more refusals of influenza vaccine than Tdap vaccine. Of ob.gyns. who responded, 62% reported that 10% or greater of their pregnant patients refused the influenza vaccine, compared with 32% reporting this for Tdap vaccine (P greater than .001; x2, less than 10% vs. 10% or greater). Of those refusing the vaccine, 48% believed influenza vaccine would make them sick; 38% felt they were unlikely to get a vaccine-preventable disease; and 32% had general worries about vaccines overall. In addition, the only strategy perceived as “very effective” in convincing a vaccine refuser to choose otherwise was “explaining that not getting the vaccine puts the fetus or newborn at risk.”
The authors shared potential limitations of their study, including the fact that they examined reported practices and perceptions, not observed practices, along with the potential that the attitudes and practices of respondents may differ from those of nonrespondents. However, they noted that this is unlikely given prior work and that next steps should consider responses to refusal while also sympathizing with the patients’ concerns. “Future work should focus on testing evidence-based strategies for addressing vaccine refusal in the obstetric setting and understanding how the unique concerns of pregnant women influence the effectiveness of such strategies,” they wrote.
The study was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. No conflicts of interest were reported.
SOURCE: O’Leary ST et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003005.
FROM OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Key clinical point: Although almost all ob.gyns. recommend the influenza and Tdap vaccines for pregnant women, both commonly are refused.
Major finding: A total of 62% of ob.gyns. reported that 10% or greater of their pregnant patients refused the influenza vaccine; 32% reported this for Tdap vaccine.
Study details: An email and mail survey sent to a national network of ob.gyns. between March and June 2016.
Disclosures: The study was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. No conflicts of interest were reported.
Source: O’Leary ST et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003005.