Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer

 

CHICAGO – The true extent of the burden imposed by nonmelanoma skin cancer remains widely underappreciated by health policy makers, the public, employers, and nondermatologist physicians, Marta J. Van Beek, MD, asserted at the annual meeting of the American College of Mohs Surgery.

It’s very much in the interest of Mohs surgeons, as the experts in cutaneous malignancies, to get the accurate message out, she added.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

“You all know the implications of skin cancer for your patients. You all know the value you bring, but what’s important is to be able to tell that story because policy makers make rules on how you treat patients, and until somebody tells the story narrative that demonstrates what we do means a lot to our patients, it’s cost effective, and it’s incredibly valuable to the medical system, we’re not finished,” declared Dr. Van Beek, professor of dermatology and director of the division of dermatologic surgery at University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City.

Abundant evidence indicates there is an ongoing epidemic of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in the United States – and it is associated with a surprising amount of morbidity and mortality, the dermatologic surgeon observed.

For example, while the American Academy of Dermatology’s 93-page Burden of Skin Disease report identified melanoma as the No. 1 cause of mortality because of skin disease – no surprise there – what may come as news to many is that NMSC was No. 2, accounting for 4,376 deaths in 2013, or 19% of the total. That’s more deaths than occurred because of wounds and burns.

And while the number of cases of NMSC is going up year after year as the population ages, it’s also the case that patients with complex NMSC are developing it at a younger and younger age. As documented in the AAD’s DataDerm registry encompassing more than 6 million patients seen by dermatologists during 2015-2017, well over 20,000 patients who underwent Mohs micrographic surgery for NMSC were aged 45-55 years, and another 60,000 were aged 55-65 years. That being said, Mohs surgery was used to treat 477,365 NMSCs in 318,933 patients included in DataDerm during 2015-2017, and in that population, basal cell carcinomas outnumbered squamous cell carcinomas 2:1.

An interesting aspect of the burden imparted by NMSC is that patients with NMSC have a higher risk of other types of cancer, and when they develop those other primary cancers they tend to do more poorly than cancer patients without a history of NMSC, Dr. Van Beek continued.

 

She cited a comprehensive study by investigators at the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, who concluded that the odds of developing a noncutaneous second primary malignancy were 27% greater in individuals with a history of NMSC than in those without such a history. The increased risk was statistically significant for 26 types of noncutaneous cancer, consistent in both men and women, and the younger a patient’s age at onset of NMSC, the stronger the association with noncutaneous cancers (Adv Cancer Res. 2016;130:257-91).

In a separate systematic review by some of the same investigators, patients with a history of squamous cell carcinoma were at a 30% increased risk of all-cause mortality and 117% greater cancer-specific mortality than those without a history of the disease. The associations were less potent for basal cell carcinoma (Arch Dermatol Res. 2017 May;309[4]:243-51).

“You are more likely to die of your nonskin cancer if you’ve ever had a skin cancer, regardless of what that other cancer is. This may mean that once you have a skin cancer, maybe that proves you have poor protoplasm that makes you more prone to other cancers, but even if that’s the case I think it demonstrates that nonmelanoma skin cancer has a substantial contribution to morbidity and mortality outside of what we normally think about,” Dr. Van Beek said.

Another underappreciated aspect of the burden of NMSC is what economists call lost opportunity cost. This isn’t the direct medical cost, but work time missed because of disease. In 2013, according to the AAD Burden of Skin Disease report, melanoma was responsible for $88 million worth of lost productivity, while for NMSC, the figure was $376 million.

 

“When you’re talking about the burden of disease, it’s important to actually talk to employers about how important it is to pay for the treatment of skin cancer because that keeps people at work and productive,” the dermatologist said.

Investigators for the World Health Organization’s Global Burden of Disease project estimate that the total years lost to disability for patients with NMSC are comparable with the figures for patients with thyroid, esophageal, or ovarian cancer, Dr. Van Beek noted.

Payers and health policy makers are unnerved by the growing utilization of Mohs surgery, she warned.

“This is really important: If you want to substantiate our utilization, you have to make policy makers understand that we are doing this because more people have skin cancer,” she emphasized.

Dr. Van Beek reported no financial conflicts regarding her presentation.

[email protected]

 

CHICAGO – The true extent of the burden imposed by nonmelanoma skin cancer remains widely underappreciated by health policy makers, the public, employers, and nondermatologist physicians, Marta J. Van Beek, MD, asserted at the annual meeting of the American College of Mohs Surgery.

It’s very much in the interest of Mohs surgeons, as the experts in cutaneous malignancies, to get the accurate message out, she added.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

“You all know the implications of skin cancer for your patients. You all know the value you bring, but what’s important is to be able to tell that story because policy makers make rules on how you treat patients, and until somebody tells the story narrative that demonstrates what we do means a lot to our patients, it’s cost effective, and it’s incredibly valuable to the medical system, we’re not finished,” declared Dr. Van Beek, professor of dermatology and director of the division of dermatologic surgery at University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City.

Abundant evidence indicates there is an ongoing epidemic of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in the United States – and it is associated with a surprising amount of morbidity and mortality, the dermatologic surgeon observed.

For example, while the American Academy of Dermatology’s 93-page Burden of Skin Disease report identified melanoma as the No. 1 cause of mortality because of skin disease – no surprise there – what may come as news to many is that NMSC was No. 2, accounting for 4,376 deaths in 2013, or 19% of the total. That’s more deaths than occurred because of wounds and burns.

And while the number of cases of NMSC is going up year after year as the population ages, it’s also the case that patients with complex NMSC are developing it at a younger and younger age. As documented in the AAD’s DataDerm registry encompassing more than 6 million patients seen by dermatologists during 2015-2017, well over 20,000 patients who underwent Mohs micrographic surgery for NMSC were aged 45-55 years, and another 60,000 were aged 55-65 years. That being said, Mohs surgery was used to treat 477,365 NMSCs in 318,933 patients included in DataDerm during 2015-2017, and in that population, basal cell carcinomas outnumbered squamous cell carcinomas 2:1.

An interesting aspect of the burden imparted by NMSC is that patients with NMSC have a higher risk of other types of cancer, and when they develop those other primary cancers they tend to do more poorly than cancer patients without a history of NMSC, Dr. Van Beek continued.

 

She cited a comprehensive study by investigators at the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, who concluded that the odds of developing a noncutaneous second primary malignancy were 27% greater in individuals with a history of NMSC than in those without such a history. The increased risk was statistically significant for 26 types of noncutaneous cancer, consistent in both men and women, and the younger a patient’s age at onset of NMSC, the stronger the association with noncutaneous cancers (Adv Cancer Res. 2016;130:257-91).

In a separate systematic review by some of the same investigators, patients with a history of squamous cell carcinoma were at a 30% increased risk of all-cause mortality and 117% greater cancer-specific mortality than those without a history of the disease. The associations were less potent for basal cell carcinoma (Arch Dermatol Res. 2017 May;309[4]:243-51).

“You are more likely to die of your nonskin cancer if you’ve ever had a skin cancer, regardless of what that other cancer is. This may mean that once you have a skin cancer, maybe that proves you have poor protoplasm that makes you more prone to other cancers, but even if that’s the case I think it demonstrates that nonmelanoma skin cancer has a substantial contribution to morbidity and mortality outside of what we normally think about,” Dr. Van Beek said.

Another underappreciated aspect of the burden of NMSC is what economists call lost opportunity cost. This isn’t the direct medical cost, but work time missed because of disease. In 2013, according to the AAD Burden of Skin Disease report, melanoma was responsible for $88 million worth of lost productivity, while for NMSC, the figure was $376 million.

 

“When you’re talking about the burden of disease, it’s important to actually talk to employers about how important it is to pay for the treatment of skin cancer because that keeps people at work and productive,” the dermatologist said.

Investigators for the World Health Organization’s Global Burden of Disease project estimate that the total years lost to disability for patients with NMSC are comparable with the figures for patients with thyroid, esophageal, or ovarian cancer, Dr. Van Beek noted.

Payers and health policy makers are unnerved by the growing utilization of Mohs surgery, she warned.

“This is really important: If you want to substantiate our utilization, you have to make policy makers understand that we are doing this because more people have skin cancer,” she emphasized.

Dr. Van Beek reported no financial conflicts regarding her presentation.

[email protected]

 

CHICAGO – The true extent of the burden imposed by nonmelanoma skin cancer remains widely underappreciated by health policy makers, the public, employers, and nondermatologist physicians, Marta J. Van Beek, MD, asserted at the annual meeting of the American College of Mohs Surgery.

It’s very much in the interest of Mohs surgeons, as the experts in cutaneous malignancies, to get the accurate message out, she added.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

“You all know the implications of skin cancer for your patients. You all know the value you bring, but what’s important is to be able to tell that story because policy makers make rules on how you treat patients, and until somebody tells the story narrative that demonstrates what we do means a lot to our patients, it’s cost effective, and it’s incredibly valuable to the medical system, we’re not finished,” declared Dr. Van Beek, professor of dermatology and director of the division of dermatologic surgery at University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City.

Abundant evidence indicates there is an ongoing epidemic of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in the United States – and it is associated with a surprising amount of morbidity and mortality, the dermatologic surgeon observed.

For example, while the American Academy of Dermatology’s 93-page Burden of Skin Disease report identified melanoma as the No. 1 cause of mortality because of skin disease – no surprise there – what may come as news to many is that NMSC was No. 2, accounting for 4,376 deaths in 2013, or 19% of the total. That’s more deaths than occurred because of wounds and burns.

And while the number of cases of NMSC is going up year after year as the population ages, it’s also the case that patients with complex NMSC are developing it at a younger and younger age. As documented in the AAD’s DataDerm registry encompassing more than 6 million patients seen by dermatologists during 2015-2017, well over 20,000 patients who underwent Mohs micrographic surgery for NMSC were aged 45-55 years, and another 60,000 were aged 55-65 years. That being said, Mohs surgery was used to treat 477,365 NMSCs in 318,933 patients included in DataDerm during 2015-2017, and in that population, basal cell carcinomas outnumbered squamous cell carcinomas 2:1.

An interesting aspect of the burden imparted by NMSC is that patients with NMSC have a higher risk of other types of cancer, and when they develop those other primary cancers they tend to do more poorly than cancer patients without a history of NMSC, Dr. Van Beek continued.

 

She cited a comprehensive study by investigators at the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, who concluded that the odds of developing a noncutaneous second primary malignancy were 27% greater in individuals with a history of NMSC than in those without such a history. The increased risk was statistically significant for 26 types of noncutaneous cancer, consistent in both men and women, and the younger a patient’s age at onset of NMSC, the stronger the association with noncutaneous cancers (Adv Cancer Res. 2016;130:257-91).

In a separate systematic review by some of the same investigators, patients with a history of squamous cell carcinoma were at a 30% increased risk of all-cause mortality and 117% greater cancer-specific mortality than those without a history of the disease. The associations were less potent for basal cell carcinoma (Arch Dermatol Res. 2017 May;309[4]:243-51).

“You are more likely to die of your nonskin cancer if you’ve ever had a skin cancer, regardless of what that other cancer is. This may mean that once you have a skin cancer, maybe that proves you have poor protoplasm that makes you more prone to other cancers, but even if that’s the case I think it demonstrates that nonmelanoma skin cancer has a substantial contribution to morbidity and mortality outside of what we normally think about,” Dr. Van Beek said.

Another underappreciated aspect of the burden of NMSC is what economists call lost opportunity cost. This isn’t the direct medical cost, but work time missed because of disease. In 2013, according to the AAD Burden of Skin Disease report, melanoma was responsible for $88 million worth of lost productivity, while for NMSC, the figure was $376 million.

 

“When you’re talking about the burden of disease, it’s important to actually talk to employers about how important it is to pay for the treatment of skin cancer because that keeps people at work and productive,” the dermatologist said.

Investigators for the World Health Organization’s Global Burden of Disease project estimate that the total years lost to disability for patients with NMSC are comparable with the figures for patients with thyroid, esophageal, or ovarian cancer, Dr. Van Beek noted.

Payers and health policy makers are unnerved by the growing utilization of Mohs surgery, she warned.

“This is really important: If you want to substantiate our utilization, you have to make policy makers understand that we are doing this because more people have skin cancer,” she emphasized.

Dr. Van Beek reported no financial conflicts regarding her presentation.

[email protected]

 

CHICAGO – The investigational programmed cell death protein 1 checkpoint inhibitor cemiplimab proved highly effective for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in a phase 1 clinical trial, Michael R. Migden, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Mohs Surgery.

And this was no ordinary phase 1 study, he noted. Because there is no Food and Drug Administration–approved treatment for advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC), cemiplimab has been granted both Breakthrough Drug and Orphan Drug status by the FDA and the European Medicines Agency.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

Moreover, on the strength of the phase 1 results – presented by Dr. Migden for the first time at the Mohs surgery meeting in recognition of the subspecialty’s essential role in this serious malignancy – along with the thus-far confirmatory results of EMPOWER-CSCC-1, an ongoing, larger, pivotal phase 2 trial, cemiplimab is currently under review by both regulatory agencies for approval as a potential therapy for advanced CSCC.

Given the likelihood that cemiplimab will receive expeditious regulatory approval to address this major unmet need, he offered his colleagues practical tips on its use, including information about the drug’s chief side effects as well as a heads-up regarding the importance of early recognition of the pseudoprogression phenomenon that can occur with the drug.

He predicted this fully human monoclonal antibody directed at programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) is going to be an important drug for Mohs surgeons.

“Immunotherapy is becoming increasingly relevant to micrographic surgery and dermatologic oncology practice and fellowship training. Care for larger, advanced CSCC falls within our scope of practice and we should play an essential role, inclusive of multidisciplinary care, in the management and follow-up of these patients,” asserted Dr. Migden, a dermatologic surgeon at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

The open-label, phase 1 study included seven patients with distant metastatic CSCC and nine with locally and/or regionally advanced disease. They were treated with 3 mg/kg IV cemiplimab every 2 weeks for 48 weeks, with Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.1 criteria used for assessment of response status every 8 weeks. More than 80% of the tumors were located in the head and neck. The great majority of study participants had previously been treated with radiation therapy and systemic agents, to little effect.

 

The complete response rate at 48 weeks was 12.5%, with tumor clearance occurring as quickly as 14 weeks. Another 25% of patients had a partial response, for an overall response rate of 37.5%. But that’s not the full success story, as another 31% of patients had stable disease. Thus, 11 of 16 patients, or 69%, experienced disease control.

“A disease-control rate of nearly 70% is really important because these are patients with life-threatening tumors. To be able to hold them steady is a big deal,” Dr. Migden observed.

One-quarter of study participants experienced progressive disease. The remainder weren’t evaluated for various reasons.

The dermatologist pointed out that locally advanced disease was particularly responsive to cemiplimab, with four of nine affected patients experiencing complete or partial response, for an overall response rate of 44%. This is consistent with the preliminary results of the pivotal phase 2 study, in which the overall response rate in the 78 participants with unresectable, locally advanced CSCC was 46%.

 

The phase 2 trial also includes another 59 patients with metastatic CSCC on 3 mg/kg IV cemiplimab every 14 days, as well as 56 patients with metastatic disease assigned to flat-dose 350-mg IV cemiplimab every 21 days.

Treatment side effects

In the phase 1 study, immunotherapy with cemiplimab was far better tolerated than in traditional cancer chemotherapy. There were two grade 3 cases of elevated liver enzymes and one of arthralgia, but no significant fatigue or nausea and no hypothyroidism. However, judging from the cumulative experience accrued with the five PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors already approved for treatment of other cancers, one must be prepared to encounter hypothyroidism and other endocrinopathies, pneumonitis, hepatitis, and rashes.

“The clinician must have a very high index of suspicion for these immune-related adverse events and a low threshold to consult with colleagues in other specialties – pulmonary, endocrine, and medical oncology – for evaluation and management of these possible side effects. I tell all the patients who are on cemiplimab, ‘Any new anything – a slight cough, mild diarrhea – you’re coming in and you’re getting checked,’ ” according to Dr. Migden.

That being said, the majority of immune-related adverse events because of PD-1 inhibitors are mild to moderate. Of the few that reach grade 3 or above, most can be successfully managed by pausing or discontinuing anti–PD-1 therapy coupled with prompt initiation of immunosuppressive therapy, typically with high-dose steroids, he added.
 

 

Look sharp for pseudoprogression

Pseudoprogression is a phenomenon whereby immunotherapy results in inflammatory changes bringing about a temporary increase in tumor size that precedes tumor shrinkage. It’s uncommon, occurring in 3 of 16 patients in the phase 1 study. The mechanism probably involves tumor infiltration by massive numbers of activated T cells. And there is evidence from other PD-1 inhibitor studies in advanced cancers that pseudoprogression may actually be a marker for increased likelihood of survival beyond 1 year.

“Pseudoprogression is important to recognize because the patients you treat with cemiplimab can get worse before they get better,” the dermatologist explained. “So you don’t want to prematurely discontinue treatment because you’re misclassifying it as tumor progression.”
 

The rationale for anti-PD-1 therapy in CSCC

Tumors that express PD-1 bind to PD–ligand 1 on T cells, switching off T-cell mediated tumor destruction and thereby allowing the malignancy to thrive.

“Simplified, the strategy here is to interfere with the interaction at the T-cell off switch, either with an antibody to PD–ligand 1, such as atezolizumab [Tecentriq], or an antibody to the PD-1 receptor, where cemiplimab works. By turning off the off switch, we get a T cell fully on and attacking the tumor cell,” Dr. Migden said.

 

“The more the tumor mutation burden, the better immunotherapy works – and CSCC has the highest tumor mutation burden of any tumor type in the Cancer Genome Atlas, several times higher than melanoma. Interestingly, basal cell carcinoma has an even higher tumor mutation burden than CSCC, but it’s not part of the atlas,” he continued.

Although the proportion of CSCCs that are locally advanced hasn’t been well established, it’s clear that CSCC is the deadliest nonmelanoma skin cancer, accounting for 3,900-8,800 deaths annually in the United States.

The cemiplimab phase 1 and 2 clinical trials for CSCC were jointly sponsored by Regeneron and Sanofi. The monoclonal antibody is also being developed for treatment of myeloma and lung cancer. Dr. Migden reported receiving honoraria from Regeneron and Sanofi, as well as from Genentech, Lilly, Novartis, and Sun Pharmaceuticals.

[email protected]

 

CHICAGO – The investigational programmed cell death protein 1 checkpoint inhibitor cemiplimab proved highly effective for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in a phase 1 clinical trial, Michael R. Migden, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Mohs Surgery.

And this was no ordinary phase 1 study, he noted. Because there is no Food and Drug Administration–approved treatment for advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC), cemiplimab has been granted both Breakthrough Drug and Orphan Drug status by the FDA and the European Medicines Agency.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

Moreover, on the strength of the phase 1 results – presented by Dr. Migden for the first time at the Mohs surgery meeting in recognition of the subspecialty’s essential role in this serious malignancy – along with the thus-far confirmatory results of EMPOWER-CSCC-1, an ongoing, larger, pivotal phase 2 trial, cemiplimab is currently under review by both regulatory agencies for approval as a potential therapy for advanced CSCC.

Given the likelihood that cemiplimab will receive expeditious regulatory approval to address this major unmet need, he offered his colleagues practical tips on its use, including information about the drug’s chief side effects as well as a heads-up regarding the importance of early recognition of the pseudoprogression phenomenon that can occur with the drug.

He predicted this fully human monoclonal antibody directed at programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) is going to be an important drug for Mohs surgeons.

“Immunotherapy is becoming increasingly relevant to micrographic surgery and dermatologic oncology practice and fellowship training. Care for larger, advanced CSCC falls within our scope of practice and we should play an essential role, inclusive of multidisciplinary care, in the management and follow-up of these patients,” asserted Dr. Migden, a dermatologic surgeon at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

The open-label, phase 1 study included seven patients with distant metastatic CSCC and nine with locally and/or regionally advanced disease. They were treated with 3 mg/kg IV cemiplimab every 2 weeks for 48 weeks, with Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.1 criteria used for assessment of response status every 8 weeks. More than 80% of the tumors were located in the head and neck. The great majority of study participants had previously been treated with radiation therapy and systemic agents, to little effect.

 

The complete response rate at 48 weeks was 12.5%, with tumor clearance occurring as quickly as 14 weeks. Another 25% of patients had a partial response, for an overall response rate of 37.5%. But that’s not the full success story, as another 31% of patients had stable disease. Thus, 11 of 16 patients, or 69%, experienced disease control.

“A disease-control rate of nearly 70% is really important because these are patients with life-threatening tumors. To be able to hold them steady is a big deal,” Dr. Migden observed.

One-quarter of study participants experienced progressive disease. The remainder weren’t evaluated for various reasons.

The dermatologist pointed out that locally advanced disease was particularly responsive to cemiplimab, with four of nine affected patients experiencing complete or partial response, for an overall response rate of 44%. This is consistent with the preliminary results of the pivotal phase 2 study, in which the overall response rate in the 78 participants with unresectable, locally advanced CSCC was 46%.

 

The phase 2 trial also includes another 59 patients with metastatic CSCC on 3 mg/kg IV cemiplimab every 14 days, as well as 56 patients with metastatic disease assigned to flat-dose 350-mg IV cemiplimab every 21 days.

Treatment side effects

In the phase 1 study, immunotherapy with cemiplimab was far better tolerated than in traditional cancer chemotherapy. There were two grade 3 cases of elevated liver enzymes and one of arthralgia, but no significant fatigue or nausea and no hypothyroidism. However, judging from the cumulative experience accrued with the five PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors already approved for treatment of other cancers, one must be prepared to encounter hypothyroidism and other endocrinopathies, pneumonitis, hepatitis, and rashes.

“The clinician must have a very high index of suspicion for these immune-related adverse events and a low threshold to consult with colleagues in other specialties – pulmonary, endocrine, and medical oncology – for evaluation and management of these possible side effects. I tell all the patients who are on cemiplimab, ‘Any new anything – a slight cough, mild diarrhea – you’re coming in and you’re getting checked,’ ” according to Dr. Migden.

That being said, the majority of immune-related adverse events because of PD-1 inhibitors are mild to moderate. Of the few that reach grade 3 or above, most can be successfully managed by pausing or discontinuing anti–PD-1 therapy coupled with prompt initiation of immunosuppressive therapy, typically with high-dose steroids, he added.
 

 

Look sharp for pseudoprogression

Pseudoprogression is a phenomenon whereby immunotherapy results in inflammatory changes bringing about a temporary increase in tumor size that precedes tumor shrinkage. It’s uncommon, occurring in 3 of 16 patients in the phase 1 study. The mechanism probably involves tumor infiltration by massive numbers of activated T cells. And there is evidence from other PD-1 inhibitor studies in advanced cancers that pseudoprogression may actually be a marker for increased likelihood of survival beyond 1 year.

“Pseudoprogression is important to recognize because the patients you treat with cemiplimab can get worse before they get better,” the dermatologist explained. “So you don’t want to prematurely discontinue treatment because you’re misclassifying it as tumor progression.”
 

The rationale for anti-PD-1 therapy in CSCC

Tumors that express PD-1 bind to PD–ligand 1 on T cells, switching off T-cell mediated tumor destruction and thereby allowing the malignancy to thrive.

“Simplified, the strategy here is to interfere with the interaction at the T-cell off switch, either with an antibody to PD–ligand 1, such as atezolizumab [Tecentriq], or an antibody to the PD-1 receptor, where cemiplimab works. By turning off the off switch, we get a T cell fully on and attacking the tumor cell,” Dr. Migden said.

 

“The more the tumor mutation burden, the better immunotherapy works – and CSCC has the highest tumor mutation burden of any tumor type in the Cancer Genome Atlas, several times higher than melanoma. Interestingly, basal cell carcinoma has an even higher tumor mutation burden than CSCC, but it’s not part of the atlas,” he continued.

Although the proportion of CSCCs that are locally advanced hasn’t been well established, it’s clear that CSCC is the deadliest nonmelanoma skin cancer, accounting for 3,900-8,800 deaths annually in the United States.

The cemiplimab phase 1 and 2 clinical trials for CSCC were jointly sponsored by Regeneron and Sanofi. The monoclonal antibody is also being developed for treatment of myeloma and lung cancer. Dr. Migden reported receiving honoraria from Regeneron and Sanofi, as well as from Genentech, Lilly, Novartis, and Sun Pharmaceuticals.

[email protected]

 

CHICAGO – The investigational programmed cell death protein 1 checkpoint inhibitor cemiplimab proved highly effective for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in a phase 1 clinical trial, Michael R. Migden, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Mohs Surgery.

And this was no ordinary phase 1 study, he noted. Because there is no Food and Drug Administration–approved treatment for advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC), cemiplimab has been granted both Breakthrough Drug and Orphan Drug status by the FDA and the European Medicines Agency.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

Moreover, on the strength of the phase 1 results – presented by Dr. Migden for the first time at the Mohs surgery meeting in recognition of the subspecialty’s essential role in this serious malignancy – along with the thus-far confirmatory results of EMPOWER-CSCC-1, an ongoing, larger, pivotal phase 2 trial, cemiplimab is currently under review by both regulatory agencies for approval as a potential therapy for advanced CSCC.

Given the likelihood that cemiplimab will receive expeditious regulatory approval to address this major unmet need, he offered his colleagues practical tips on its use, including information about the drug’s chief side effects as well as a heads-up regarding the importance of early recognition of the pseudoprogression phenomenon that can occur with the drug.

He predicted this fully human monoclonal antibody directed at programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) is going to be an important drug for Mohs surgeons.

“Immunotherapy is becoming increasingly relevant to micrographic surgery and dermatologic oncology practice and fellowship training. Care for larger, advanced CSCC falls within our scope of practice and we should play an essential role, inclusive of multidisciplinary care, in the management and follow-up of these patients,” asserted Dr. Migden, a dermatologic surgeon at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

The open-label, phase 1 study included seven patients with distant metastatic CSCC and nine with locally and/or regionally advanced disease. They were treated with 3 mg/kg IV cemiplimab every 2 weeks for 48 weeks, with Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.1 criteria used for assessment of response status every 8 weeks. More than 80% of the tumors were located in the head and neck. The great majority of study participants had previously been treated with radiation therapy and systemic agents, to little effect.

 

The complete response rate at 48 weeks was 12.5%, with tumor clearance occurring as quickly as 14 weeks. Another 25% of patients had a partial response, for an overall response rate of 37.5%. But that’s not the full success story, as another 31% of patients had stable disease. Thus, 11 of 16 patients, or 69%, experienced disease control.

“A disease-control rate of nearly 70% is really important because these are patients with life-threatening tumors. To be able to hold them steady is a big deal,” Dr. Migden observed.

One-quarter of study participants experienced progressive disease. The remainder weren’t evaluated for various reasons.

The dermatologist pointed out that locally advanced disease was particularly responsive to cemiplimab, with four of nine affected patients experiencing complete or partial response, for an overall response rate of 44%. This is consistent with the preliminary results of the pivotal phase 2 study, in which the overall response rate in the 78 participants with unresectable, locally advanced CSCC was 46%.

 

The phase 2 trial also includes another 59 patients with metastatic CSCC on 3 mg/kg IV cemiplimab every 14 days, as well as 56 patients with metastatic disease assigned to flat-dose 350-mg IV cemiplimab every 21 days.

Treatment side effects

In the phase 1 study, immunotherapy with cemiplimab was far better tolerated than in traditional cancer chemotherapy. There were two grade 3 cases of elevated liver enzymes and one of arthralgia, but no significant fatigue or nausea and no hypothyroidism. However, judging from the cumulative experience accrued with the five PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors already approved for treatment of other cancers, one must be prepared to encounter hypothyroidism and other endocrinopathies, pneumonitis, hepatitis, and rashes.

“The clinician must have a very high index of suspicion for these immune-related adverse events and a low threshold to consult with colleagues in other specialties – pulmonary, endocrine, and medical oncology – for evaluation and management of these possible side effects. I tell all the patients who are on cemiplimab, ‘Any new anything – a slight cough, mild diarrhea – you’re coming in and you’re getting checked,’ ” according to Dr. Migden.

That being said, the majority of immune-related adverse events because of PD-1 inhibitors are mild to moderate. Of the few that reach grade 3 or above, most can be successfully managed by pausing or discontinuing anti–PD-1 therapy coupled with prompt initiation of immunosuppressive therapy, typically with high-dose steroids, he added.
 

 

Look sharp for pseudoprogression

Pseudoprogression is a phenomenon whereby immunotherapy results in inflammatory changes bringing about a temporary increase in tumor size that precedes tumor shrinkage. It’s uncommon, occurring in 3 of 16 patients in the phase 1 study. The mechanism probably involves tumor infiltration by massive numbers of activated T cells. And there is evidence from other PD-1 inhibitor studies in advanced cancers that pseudoprogression may actually be a marker for increased likelihood of survival beyond 1 year.

“Pseudoprogression is important to recognize because the patients you treat with cemiplimab can get worse before they get better,” the dermatologist explained. “So you don’t want to prematurely discontinue treatment because you’re misclassifying it as tumor progression.”
 

The rationale for anti-PD-1 therapy in CSCC

Tumors that express PD-1 bind to PD–ligand 1 on T cells, switching off T-cell mediated tumor destruction and thereby allowing the malignancy to thrive.

“Simplified, the strategy here is to interfere with the interaction at the T-cell off switch, either with an antibody to PD–ligand 1, such as atezolizumab [Tecentriq], or an antibody to the PD-1 receptor, where cemiplimab works. By turning off the off switch, we get a T cell fully on and attacking the tumor cell,” Dr. Migden said.

 

“The more the tumor mutation burden, the better immunotherapy works – and CSCC has the highest tumor mutation burden of any tumor type in the Cancer Genome Atlas, several times higher than melanoma. Interestingly, basal cell carcinoma has an even higher tumor mutation burden than CSCC, but it’s not part of the atlas,” he continued.

Although the proportion of CSCCs that are locally advanced hasn’t been well established, it’s clear that CSCC is the deadliest nonmelanoma skin cancer, accounting for 3,900-8,800 deaths annually in the United States.

The cemiplimab phase 1 and 2 clinical trials for CSCC were jointly sponsored by Regeneron and Sanofi. The monoclonal antibody is also being developed for treatment of myeloma and lung cancer. Dr. Migden reported receiving honoraria from Regeneron and Sanofi, as well as from Genentech, Lilly, Novartis, and Sun Pharmaceuticals.

[email protected]

CHICAGO – Patidegib, a first-in-class topical hedgehog pathway inhibitor, mitigated the burden of facial basal cell carcinoma in patients with Gorlin Syndrome in a phase 2 study, and did so without causing the problematic adverse events that prompt many Gorlin patients to discontinue systemic hedgehog inhibitor drugs, Ervin Epstein Jr., MD, said at the annual meeting of the American College of Mohs Surgery.

He characterized patidegib, a small-molecule cyclopamine derivative, as “a Goldilocks drug, a topical hedgehog inhibitor with percutaneous absorption that’s just right: sufficient to have anti-hedgehog and anti–basal cell carcinoma efficacy, but not enough to cause systemic exposure or systemic adverse events.”

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

He presented the results of a double-blind phase 2 proof-of-concept study conducted in the United Kingdom. It involved 18 patients with Gorlin syndrome and, collectively, 68 surgically eligible basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) on the face at baseline; patients were randomized to application of 2% or 4% patidegib gel or vehicle twice daily all over their face for 6 months.

A complete response – tumor clinical disappearance – occurred in 25% of the BCCs in the two active treatment arms. In contrast, none of the BCCs in the control group cleared. Patients on patidegib developed one or more new surgically eligible BCCs after study week 2 at a rate of 0.4 tumors per patient, markedly less than the rate of 1.4 tumors per patient in controls.

“We think that prevention is really the place to go with this drug,” said Dr. Epstein, cofounder and chief medical officer at PellePharm, the company based in Menlo Park, Calif., that is developing patidegib.

Indeed, he envisions patidegib gel as lifetime therapy for Gorlin patients.

Tumor shrinkage was significantly greater with 2% patidegib than with the 4% concentration. But so was treatment adherence: Patients in the 2% patidegib arm missed on average just 2 days of therapy over the course of 6 months, while those in the 4% arm missed 50 days. Dr. Epstein attributed this discrepancy to a freak of randomization that can occur in such a small study: 5 of 6 patients in the 2% patidegib group were women, while most in the 4% arm were men. And the men were far less adherent to treatment, possibly because men are less accustomed to applying a product on their face daily, he noted.

 

In any case, it’s the 2% gel formulation that is moving on to a phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial. The 150-patient U.S. and European study, scheduled to start this summer, will have as its primary endpoint the rate of new BCCs over the course of 1 year. The Food and Drug Administration has granted topical patidegib Breakthrough Drug and Orphan Drug status.

Dr. Epstein said that, in the phase 2 study, BCC shrinkage occurred only in patients whose hedgehog pathway activity decreased after 6 weeks of topical therapy as evidenced by a reduction in the GLI1 mRNA biomarker. Of note, circulating blood levels of patidegib in study participants were more than 500-fold lower than when the drug is given orally. And of greatest importance, rates of the hallmark side effects of oral hedgehog inhibitor therapy that cause so many patients to discontinue therapy – muscle cramps, taste loss, and hair loss – were no different in patients on patidegib gel than in those on placebo.

“In the randomized trial of vismodegib [Erivedge], half of patients stopped taking it within 1 year despite good results. And indeed, when they stopped taking the drug, the basal cell carcinomas returned,” the dermatologist noted.

Dr. Epstein is an employee of PellePharm, which is developing patidegib. Dermatologists with patients with Gorlin syndrome who are interested in participating in the phase 3 trial can contact him at [email protected].

[email protected]

CHICAGO – Patidegib, a first-in-class topical hedgehog pathway inhibitor, mitigated the burden of facial basal cell carcinoma in patients with Gorlin Syndrome in a phase 2 study, and did so without causing the problematic adverse events that prompt many Gorlin patients to discontinue systemic hedgehog inhibitor drugs, Ervin Epstein Jr., MD, said at the annual meeting of the American College of Mohs Surgery.

He characterized patidegib, a small-molecule cyclopamine derivative, as “a Goldilocks drug, a topical hedgehog inhibitor with percutaneous absorption that’s just right: sufficient to have anti-hedgehog and anti–basal cell carcinoma efficacy, but not enough to cause systemic exposure or systemic adverse events.”

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

He presented the results of a double-blind phase 2 proof-of-concept study conducted in the United Kingdom. It involved 18 patients with Gorlin syndrome and, collectively, 68 surgically eligible basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) on the face at baseline; patients were randomized to application of 2% or 4% patidegib gel or vehicle twice daily all over their face for 6 months.

A complete response – tumor clinical disappearance – occurred in 25% of the BCCs in the two active treatment arms. In contrast, none of the BCCs in the control group cleared. Patients on patidegib developed one or more new surgically eligible BCCs after study week 2 at a rate of 0.4 tumors per patient, markedly less than the rate of 1.4 tumors per patient in controls.

“We think that prevention is really the place to go with this drug,” said Dr. Epstein, cofounder and chief medical officer at PellePharm, the company based in Menlo Park, Calif., that is developing patidegib.

Indeed, he envisions patidegib gel as lifetime therapy for Gorlin patients.

Tumor shrinkage was significantly greater with 2% patidegib than with the 4% concentration. But so was treatment adherence: Patients in the 2% patidegib arm missed on average just 2 days of therapy over the course of 6 months, while those in the 4% arm missed 50 days. Dr. Epstein attributed this discrepancy to a freak of randomization that can occur in such a small study: 5 of 6 patients in the 2% patidegib group were women, while most in the 4% arm were men. And the men were far less adherent to treatment, possibly because men are less accustomed to applying a product on their face daily, he noted.

 

In any case, it’s the 2% gel formulation that is moving on to a phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial. The 150-patient U.S. and European study, scheduled to start this summer, will have as its primary endpoint the rate of new BCCs over the course of 1 year. The Food and Drug Administration has granted topical patidegib Breakthrough Drug and Orphan Drug status.

Dr. Epstein said that, in the phase 2 study, BCC shrinkage occurred only in patients whose hedgehog pathway activity decreased after 6 weeks of topical therapy as evidenced by a reduction in the GLI1 mRNA biomarker. Of note, circulating blood levels of patidegib in study participants were more than 500-fold lower than when the drug is given orally. And of greatest importance, rates of the hallmark side effects of oral hedgehog inhibitor therapy that cause so many patients to discontinue therapy – muscle cramps, taste loss, and hair loss – were no different in patients on patidegib gel than in those on placebo.

“In the randomized trial of vismodegib [Erivedge], half of patients stopped taking it within 1 year despite good results. And indeed, when they stopped taking the drug, the basal cell carcinomas returned,” the dermatologist noted.

Dr. Epstein is an employee of PellePharm, which is developing patidegib. Dermatologists with patients with Gorlin syndrome who are interested in participating in the phase 3 trial can contact him at [email protected].

[email protected]

CHICAGO – Patidegib, a first-in-class topical hedgehog pathway inhibitor, mitigated the burden of facial basal cell carcinoma in patients with Gorlin Syndrome in a phase 2 study, and did so without causing the problematic adverse events that prompt many Gorlin patients to discontinue systemic hedgehog inhibitor drugs, Ervin Epstein Jr., MD, said at the annual meeting of the American College of Mohs Surgery.

He characterized patidegib, a small-molecule cyclopamine derivative, as “a Goldilocks drug, a topical hedgehog inhibitor with percutaneous absorption that’s just right: sufficient to have anti-hedgehog and anti–basal cell carcinoma efficacy, but not enough to cause systemic exposure or systemic adverse events.”

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

He presented the results of a double-blind phase 2 proof-of-concept study conducted in the United Kingdom. It involved 18 patients with Gorlin syndrome and, collectively, 68 surgically eligible basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) on the face at baseline; patients were randomized to application of 2% or 4% patidegib gel or vehicle twice daily all over their face for 6 months.

A complete response – tumor clinical disappearance – occurred in 25% of the BCCs in the two active treatment arms. In contrast, none of the BCCs in the control group cleared. Patients on patidegib developed one or more new surgically eligible BCCs after study week 2 at a rate of 0.4 tumors per patient, markedly less than the rate of 1.4 tumors per patient in controls.

“We think that prevention is really the place to go with this drug,” said Dr. Epstein, cofounder and chief medical officer at PellePharm, the company based in Menlo Park, Calif., that is developing patidegib.

Indeed, he envisions patidegib gel as lifetime therapy for Gorlin patients.

Tumor shrinkage was significantly greater with 2% patidegib than with the 4% concentration. But so was treatment adherence: Patients in the 2% patidegib arm missed on average just 2 days of therapy over the course of 6 months, while those in the 4% arm missed 50 days. Dr. Epstein attributed this discrepancy to a freak of randomization that can occur in such a small study: 5 of 6 patients in the 2% patidegib group were women, while most in the 4% arm were men. And the men were far less adherent to treatment, possibly because men are less accustomed to applying a product on their face daily, he noted.

 

In any case, it’s the 2% gel formulation that is moving on to a phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial. The 150-patient U.S. and European study, scheduled to start this summer, will have as its primary endpoint the rate of new BCCs over the course of 1 year. The Food and Drug Administration has granted topical patidegib Breakthrough Drug and Orphan Drug status.

Dr. Epstein said that, in the phase 2 study, BCC shrinkage occurred only in patients whose hedgehog pathway activity decreased after 6 weeks of topical therapy as evidenced by a reduction in the GLI1 mRNA biomarker. Of note, circulating blood levels of patidegib in study participants were more than 500-fold lower than when the drug is given orally. And of greatest importance, rates of the hallmark side effects of oral hedgehog inhibitor therapy that cause so many patients to discontinue therapy – muscle cramps, taste loss, and hair loss – were no different in patients on patidegib gel than in those on placebo.

“In the randomized trial of vismodegib [Erivedge], half of patients stopped taking it within 1 year despite good results. And indeed, when they stopped taking the drug, the basal cell carcinomas returned,” the dermatologist noted.

Dr. Epstein is an employee of PellePharm, which is developing patidegib. Dermatologists with patients with Gorlin syndrome who are interested in participating in the phase 3 trial can contact him at [email protected].

[email protected]

 

CHICAGO – Routine use of an N95 mask during electrocautery is an effective and inexpensive way for dermatologic surgeons to protect themselves from toxic, airborne particulate matter in the smoke generated during the procedure, Emily de Golian, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American College of Mohs Surgery.

“Our data suggest clear dominance of N95 masks at filtering electrocautery particulate matter over commonly utilized basic procedural masks, as well as superiority to the laser masks that are used in hair removal procedures and ablative procedures in cosmetic clinics,” commented Dr. de Golian, a Mohs micrographic surgery fellow at the University of California, San Diego.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

This is an inexpensive protective strategy, and Dr. de Golian priced N95 masks on Amazon at 94 cents each. While that’s more than the 11 cents per standard procedural mask with earloops or 83 cents for a laser mask on Amazon, it’s still small potatoes considering the enhanced protection she documented in her study. Of note, all of the masks cost more when purchased from medical supply companies.

This matter of self-protection from the effects of electrocautery smoke plumes deserves greater attention from the dermatologic community, according to Dr. de Golian. There is solid evidence that these plumes contain high concentrations of known carcinogens, including benzene, acetonitrile, and butadiene – indeed, concentrations far in excess of what’s found in second-hand cigarette smoke. Moreover, many of these airborne carcinogens and other toxins have been linked to leukemia, neurologic disorders, lung cancer, thrombotic disorders, lung disease, and infectious disease transmission, albeit not convincingly so to date in dermatologic surgeons. But why wait for definitive evidence to accrue?

“In light of these hazards – and according to governmental guidelines – dermatologic surgeons would be wise to adopt protective measures during surgical procedures,” Dr. de Golian said.

But they haven’t. She cited a national survey conducted several years ago by a colleague in which 79% of the 316 responding dermatologic surgeons indicated they use no smoke management whatsoever, neither masks nor a local exhaust evacuation system. Only 10% employed smoke management 25%-50% of the time during electrocautery, and a scant 11% of dermatologic surgeons did so at least 75% of the time (Dermatol Surg. 2014 Dec;40[12]:1373-7).

Given the far more substantial expense of installing an office smoke evacuation system, mask filtration becomes an attractive alternative. But the relative efficacy of the various types of masks in blocking fine and ultrafine particulate matter contained in electrocautery plumes hadn’t previously been systematically studied. This created the impetus for Dr. de Golian’s study.

 

ninuns/iStock/Getty Images Plus

She placed N95 masks, basic procedural masks, and laser masks over the probes of two commercially available airborne particle counters, one capturing ultrafine particles less than 1 mcm in size, the other for particles greater than 2.5 mcm. She sealed the mask edges to the probes with tape to eliminate loose fit as a confounder. Then she and her coinvestigators performed monopolar electrocautery on discarded surgical Burow triangle tissue specimens to order to create smoke plumes and test mask effectiveness. This process was repeated five times for each type of mask, as well as for a no-mask control condition.

The N95 masks were the clear winner, particularly when it came to filtering the ultrafine particles, which are of greatest concern because they remain suspended in air longer and penetrate deeper into the respiratory tract than larger particles. The N95 masks proved superior to procedural masks, which in turn were significantly more effective than the laser masks. The differences between mask performance for larger particle filtration were smaller, although the N95 remained number one. She noted that the study results probably underestimate the true filtration efficacy of N95 masks, since they form a tighter seal with the face in clinical practice than with the other two mask types.

Mask self-protection “is easily applicable in your own practice, and it meets NIOSH-recommended [National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health] standards for safety in the workplace,” the dermatologist noted.

In the next phase of her research, she plans to evaluate the optimal technology and techniques of smoke evacuation in the surgical suite. That’s an attractive method because it protects everyone in the room, not just the surgeon. And while the practitioner survey indicates this technology isn’t widely used by dermatologic surgeons on a routine basis at present, that could change, particularly in the current era in which patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction surveys have taken on added weight.

 

“Patients prefer not smelling their own tissue burning,” Dr. de Golian said.

She reported no financial conflicts regarding her study, which was conducted free of commercial support.
 

[email protected]

 

CHICAGO – Routine use of an N95 mask during electrocautery is an effective and inexpensive way for dermatologic surgeons to protect themselves from toxic, airborne particulate matter in the smoke generated during the procedure, Emily de Golian, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American College of Mohs Surgery.

“Our data suggest clear dominance of N95 masks at filtering electrocautery particulate matter over commonly utilized basic procedural masks, as well as superiority to the laser masks that are used in hair removal procedures and ablative procedures in cosmetic clinics,” commented Dr. de Golian, a Mohs micrographic surgery fellow at the University of California, San Diego.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

This is an inexpensive protective strategy, and Dr. de Golian priced N95 masks on Amazon at 94 cents each. While that’s more than the 11 cents per standard procedural mask with earloops or 83 cents for a laser mask on Amazon, it’s still small potatoes considering the enhanced protection she documented in her study. Of note, all of the masks cost more when purchased from medical supply companies.

This matter of self-protection from the effects of electrocautery smoke plumes deserves greater attention from the dermatologic community, according to Dr. de Golian. There is solid evidence that these plumes contain high concentrations of known carcinogens, including benzene, acetonitrile, and butadiene – indeed, concentrations far in excess of what’s found in second-hand cigarette smoke. Moreover, many of these airborne carcinogens and other toxins have been linked to leukemia, neurologic disorders, lung cancer, thrombotic disorders, lung disease, and infectious disease transmission, albeit not convincingly so to date in dermatologic surgeons. But why wait for definitive evidence to accrue?

“In light of these hazards – and according to governmental guidelines – dermatologic surgeons would be wise to adopt protective measures during surgical procedures,” Dr. de Golian said.

But they haven’t. She cited a national survey conducted several years ago by a colleague in which 79% of the 316 responding dermatologic surgeons indicated they use no smoke management whatsoever, neither masks nor a local exhaust evacuation system. Only 10% employed smoke management 25%-50% of the time during electrocautery, and a scant 11% of dermatologic surgeons did so at least 75% of the time (Dermatol Surg. 2014 Dec;40[12]:1373-7).

Given the far more substantial expense of installing an office smoke evacuation system, mask filtration becomes an attractive alternative. But the relative efficacy of the various types of masks in blocking fine and ultrafine particulate matter contained in electrocautery plumes hadn’t previously been systematically studied. This created the impetus for Dr. de Golian’s study.

 

ninuns/iStock/Getty Images Plus

She placed N95 masks, basic procedural masks, and laser masks over the probes of two commercially available airborne particle counters, one capturing ultrafine particles less than 1 mcm in size, the other for particles greater than 2.5 mcm. She sealed the mask edges to the probes with tape to eliminate loose fit as a confounder. Then she and her coinvestigators performed monopolar electrocautery on discarded surgical Burow triangle tissue specimens to order to create smoke plumes and test mask effectiveness. This process was repeated five times for each type of mask, as well as for a no-mask control condition.

The N95 masks were the clear winner, particularly when it came to filtering the ultrafine particles, which are of greatest concern because they remain suspended in air longer and penetrate deeper into the respiratory tract than larger particles. The N95 masks proved superior to procedural masks, which in turn were significantly more effective than the laser masks. The differences between mask performance for larger particle filtration were smaller, although the N95 remained number one. She noted that the study results probably underestimate the true filtration efficacy of N95 masks, since they form a tighter seal with the face in clinical practice than with the other two mask types.

Mask self-protection “is easily applicable in your own practice, and it meets NIOSH-recommended [National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health] standards for safety in the workplace,” the dermatologist noted.

In the next phase of her research, she plans to evaluate the optimal technology and techniques of smoke evacuation in the surgical suite. That’s an attractive method because it protects everyone in the room, not just the surgeon. And while the practitioner survey indicates this technology isn’t widely used by dermatologic surgeons on a routine basis at present, that could change, particularly in the current era in which patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction surveys have taken on added weight.

 

“Patients prefer not smelling their own tissue burning,” Dr. de Golian said.

She reported no financial conflicts regarding her study, which was conducted free of commercial support.
 

[email protected]

 

CHICAGO – Routine use of an N95 mask during electrocautery is an effective and inexpensive way for dermatologic surgeons to protect themselves from toxic, airborne particulate matter in the smoke generated during the procedure, Emily de Golian, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American College of Mohs Surgery.

“Our data suggest clear dominance of N95 masks at filtering electrocautery particulate matter over commonly utilized basic procedural masks, as well as superiority to the laser masks that are used in hair removal procedures and ablative procedures in cosmetic clinics,” commented Dr. de Golian, a Mohs micrographic surgery fellow at the University of California, San Diego.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

This is an inexpensive protective strategy, and Dr. de Golian priced N95 masks on Amazon at 94 cents each. While that’s more than the 11 cents per standard procedural mask with earloops or 83 cents for a laser mask on Amazon, it’s still small potatoes considering the enhanced protection she documented in her study. Of note, all of the masks cost more when purchased from medical supply companies.

This matter of self-protection from the effects of electrocautery smoke plumes deserves greater attention from the dermatologic community, according to Dr. de Golian. There is solid evidence that these plumes contain high concentrations of known carcinogens, including benzene, acetonitrile, and butadiene – indeed, concentrations far in excess of what’s found in second-hand cigarette smoke. Moreover, many of these airborne carcinogens and other toxins have been linked to leukemia, neurologic disorders, lung cancer, thrombotic disorders, lung disease, and infectious disease transmission, albeit not convincingly so to date in dermatologic surgeons. But why wait for definitive evidence to accrue?

“In light of these hazards – and according to governmental guidelines – dermatologic surgeons would be wise to adopt protective measures during surgical procedures,” Dr. de Golian said.

But they haven’t. She cited a national survey conducted several years ago by a colleague in which 79% of the 316 responding dermatologic surgeons indicated they use no smoke management whatsoever, neither masks nor a local exhaust evacuation system. Only 10% employed smoke management 25%-50% of the time during electrocautery, and a scant 11% of dermatologic surgeons did so at least 75% of the time (Dermatol Surg. 2014 Dec;40[12]:1373-7).

Given the far more substantial expense of installing an office smoke evacuation system, mask filtration becomes an attractive alternative. But the relative efficacy of the various types of masks in blocking fine and ultrafine particulate matter contained in electrocautery plumes hadn’t previously been systematically studied. This created the impetus for Dr. de Golian’s study.

 

ninuns/iStock/Getty Images Plus

She placed N95 masks, basic procedural masks, and laser masks over the probes of two commercially available airborne particle counters, one capturing ultrafine particles less than 1 mcm in size, the other for particles greater than 2.5 mcm. She sealed the mask edges to the probes with tape to eliminate loose fit as a confounder. Then she and her coinvestigators performed monopolar electrocautery on discarded surgical Burow triangle tissue specimens to order to create smoke plumes and test mask effectiveness. This process was repeated five times for each type of mask, as well as for a no-mask control condition.

The N95 masks were the clear winner, particularly when it came to filtering the ultrafine particles, which are of greatest concern because they remain suspended in air longer and penetrate deeper into the respiratory tract than larger particles. The N95 masks proved superior to procedural masks, which in turn were significantly more effective than the laser masks. The differences between mask performance for larger particle filtration were smaller, although the N95 remained number one. She noted that the study results probably underestimate the true filtration efficacy of N95 masks, since they form a tighter seal with the face in clinical practice than with the other two mask types.

Mask self-protection “is easily applicable in your own practice, and it meets NIOSH-recommended [National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health] standards for safety in the workplace,” the dermatologist noted.

In the next phase of her research, she plans to evaluate the optimal technology and techniques of smoke evacuation in the surgical suite. That’s an attractive method because it protects everyone in the room, not just the surgeon. And while the practitioner survey indicates this technology isn’t widely used by dermatologic surgeons on a routine basis at present, that could change, particularly in the current era in which patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction surveys have taken on added weight.

 

“Patients prefer not smelling their own tissue burning,” Dr. de Golian said.

She reported no financial conflicts regarding her study, which was conducted free of commercial support.
 

[email protected]

Meningiomas generally present as slow-growing, expanding intracranial lesions and are the most common benign intracranial tumor in adults.¹ Rarely, meningioma exhibits malignant potential and presents as an extracranial soft-tissue mass through extension or as a primary extracranial cutaneous neoplasm. The differential diagnosis of scalp neoplasms must be broadened to include uncommon tumors such as meningioma. We present a rare case of a 68-year-old woman with scalp metastasis of meningioma 11 years after initial resection of the primary tumor.

Case Report

A 68-year-old woman presented for evaluation of an asymptomatic nodule on the left parietal scalp of 2 years’ duration. She denied any headaches, difficulty with balance, vision changes, or changes in mentation. Her medical history was remarkable for a benign meningioma removed from the right parietal scalp 11 years prior without radiation therapy, as well as type 2 diabetes mellitus and arthritis. The patient’s son died from a brain tumor, but the exact tumor type and age at the time of death were unknown. Her current medications included metformin, insulin glargine, aspirin, and a daily multivitamin. She denied any allergies or history of smoking.

Physical examination of the scalp revealed 4 fixed, nontender, flesh-colored nodules: 2 on the left parietal scalp measuring 3.0 cm and 0.8 cm, respectively (Figure 1A); a 0.4-cm nodule on the right posterior occipital scalp; and a 1.6-cm sausage-shaped nodule on the right temple (Figure 1B). No positive lymph nodes were appreciated, and no additional lesions were noted. No additional atypical lesions were noted on full cutaneous examination.

A diagnostic 6-mm punch biopsy of the largest nodule was performed. Intraoperatively, there was no apparent cyst wall, but coiled, loose, stringlike, pink-yellow tissue was removed from the base of the wound before closing with sutures.

The primary histologic finding was cells within fibrous tissue containing delicate round-oval nuclei, inconspicuous nucleoli, and lightly eosinophilic cytoplasm with an indistinct border (Figure 2). Immunohistochemical studies for S100 protein were focal and limited to the cytoplasm of a subset of neoplastic cells (Figure 3). Tumor cells stained positive for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and were focally positive for progesterone receptor (Figure 4). Tumor cells were negative for CD31 and CD34. Based on the clinical and histologic findings, a diagnosis of metastatic meningioma of the scalp was made.

Magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography of the head, neck, and chest demonstrated 3 residual subcutaneous nodules on the scalp and an indeterminate subcentimeter nodule in the right lung. The 0.4-cm nodule on the right posterior occipital scalp was removed without complication, and no radiation therapy was administered. The rest of the lesions were monitored. She remained under the close observation of a neurosurgeon and underwent repeat imaging of the scalp nodules and lungs, initially at 3 months and then routinely at the patient’s comfort. The patient currently denies any neurologic symptoms.

Comment

Meningiomas are derived from meningothelial cells found in the leptomeninges and in the choroid plexus of the ventricles of the brain.² They are common intracranial neoplasms that generally are associated with a benign course and present during the fourth to sixth decades of life. Meningiomas constitute 13% to 30% of intracranial neoplasms and usually are female predominant (3:1).^3,4 Rarely, malignant transformation can lead to local and distant metastasis to the lungs,^5,6 liver,⁷ and skeletal system.⁸ In cases of metastatic spread, there is an increased incidence in males versus females.^9-11

Risk Factors
Although many meningiomas are sporadic, numerous risk factors have been associated with the disease development. One study showed a link between exposure to ionizing radiation and subsequent development of meningioma.¹² Another study found a population link between a higher incidence of meningioma and nuclear exposure in Hiroshima, Japan, after the atomic bomb blast in 1980.¹³ There is an increased incidence of meningioma in patients exposed to radiography from frequent dental imaging, particularly when older machines with higher levels of radiation exposure are used.¹⁴Another study demonstrated a correlation between meningioma and hormonal factors (eg, estrogen for hormone therapy) and exacerbation of symptoms during pregnancy.¹⁵ There also is an increased incidence of meningioma in breast cancer patients.⁴ Genetic alterations also have been implicated in the development of meningioma. It was found that 50% of patients with a mutation in the neurofibromatosis 2 gene (which codes for the merlin protein) had associated meningiomas.^16,17 Scalp nodules in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 increases suspicion of a scalp meningioma and necessitates biopsy.

Clinical Presentation
Cutaneous meningiomas typically present as firm, subcutaneous nodules. Scalp nodules ranging from alopecia^18,19 to hypertrichosis²⁰ have been reported. These neoplasms can be painless or painful, depending on mass effect and location.

Classification
The primary clinical classification system of metastatic meningioma was first described in 1974.²¹ Type 1 meningioma refers to congenital lesions that tend to cluster closer to the midline. Type 2 refers to ectopic soft-tissue lesions that extend to the skin from likely remnants of arachnoid cells. These lesions are more likely to be found around the eyes, ears, nose, and mouth. Type 3 meningiomas extend from intracranial tumors that secondarily involve the skin through proliferation through bone or anatomic defects. Type 3 is the result of direct extension and the location of the cutaneous presentation depends on the location of the intracranial lesion.^4,22,23

Pathology
Meningiomas exhibit a range of morphologic appearances on histopathology. In almost all meningiomas, tumor cells are concentrically wrapped in tight whorls with round-oval nuclei and delicate chromatin, central clearing, and pale pseudonuclear inclusions. Lamellate calcifications known as psammoma bodies are a common finding. Immunohistochemical studies show that most meningiomas are positive for EMA, vimentin, and progesterone receptor. S100 protein expression, if present, usually is focal.

Differential Diagnosis
Asymptomatic nodules on the scalp may present a diagnostic challenge to physicians. Most common scalp lesions tend to be cystic or lipomatous. In children, a broad differential diagnosis should be considered, including dermoid and epidermoid tumors, dermal sinus tumors, hemangiomas, metastasis of another tumor, aplasia cutis congenita, pilomatricoma, and lipoma. In adults, the differential should focus on epidermoid cysts, lipomas, metastasis of other tumors, osteomas, arteriovenous fistulae, and heterotopic brain tissue. Often, microscopic examination is necessary, along with additional immunohistochemical staining (eg, EMA, vimentin).

Treatment
Treatment options for meningioma include observation, surgical resection, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy, as well as a combination of these modalities. The choice of therapy depends on such variables as patient age; performance status; comorbidities; presence or absence of symptoms (including focal neurologic deficits); and tumor location, size, and grade. It is important to note that there is limited knowledge looking at the results of various treatment modalities, and no consensus approach has been established.

Conclusion

Our patient’s medical history was remarkable for an intracranial meningioma 11 years prior to the current presentation, and she was found to have biopsy-proven metastatic meningioma without recurrence of the initial tumor. Patients presenting with a scalp nodule warrant a thorough medical history and consideration beyond common cysts and lipomas.

Meningiomas generally present as slow-growing, expanding intracranial lesions and are the most common benign intracranial tumor in adults.¹ Rarely, meningioma exhibits malignant potential and presents as an extracranial soft-tissue mass through extension or as a primary extracranial cutaneous neoplasm. The differential diagnosis of scalp neoplasms must be broadened to include uncommon tumors such as meningioma. We present a rare case of a 68-year-old woman with scalp metastasis of meningioma 11 years after initial resection of the primary tumor.

Case Report

A 68-year-old woman presented for evaluation of an asymptomatic nodule on the left parietal scalp of 2 years’ duration. She denied any headaches, difficulty with balance, vision changes, or changes in mentation. Her medical history was remarkable for a benign meningioma removed from the right parietal scalp 11 years prior without radiation therapy, as well as type 2 diabetes mellitus and arthritis. The patient’s son died from a brain tumor, but the exact tumor type and age at the time of death were unknown. Her current medications included metformin, insulin glargine, aspirin, and a daily multivitamin. She denied any allergies or history of smoking.

Physical examination of the scalp revealed 4 fixed, nontender, flesh-colored nodules: 2 on the left parietal scalp measuring 3.0 cm and 0.8 cm, respectively (Figure 1A); a 0.4-cm nodule on the right posterior occipital scalp; and a 1.6-cm sausage-shaped nodule on the right temple (Figure 1B). No positive lymph nodes were appreciated, and no additional lesions were noted. No additional atypical lesions were noted on full cutaneous examination.

A diagnostic 6-mm punch biopsy of the largest nodule was performed. Intraoperatively, there was no apparent cyst wall, but coiled, loose, stringlike, pink-yellow tissue was removed from the base of the wound before closing with sutures.

The primary histologic finding was cells within fibrous tissue containing delicate round-oval nuclei, inconspicuous nucleoli, and lightly eosinophilic cytoplasm with an indistinct border (Figure 2). Immunohistochemical studies for S100 protein were focal and limited to the cytoplasm of a subset of neoplastic cells (Figure 3). Tumor cells stained positive for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and were focally positive for progesterone receptor (Figure 4). Tumor cells were negative for CD31 and CD34. Based on the clinical and histologic findings, a diagnosis of metastatic meningioma of the scalp was made.

Magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography of the head, neck, and chest demonstrated 3 residual subcutaneous nodules on the scalp and an indeterminate subcentimeter nodule in the right lung. The 0.4-cm nodule on the right posterior occipital scalp was removed without complication, and no radiation therapy was administered. The rest of the lesions were monitored. She remained under the close observation of a neurosurgeon and underwent repeat imaging of the scalp nodules and lungs, initially at 3 months and then routinely at the patient’s comfort. The patient currently denies any neurologic symptoms.

Comment

Meningiomas are derived from meningothelial cells found in the leptomeninges and in the choroid plexus of the ventricles of the brain.² They are common intracranial neoplasms that generally are associated with a benign course and present during the fourth to sixth decades of life. Meningiomas constitute 13% to 30% of intracranial neoplasms and usually are female predominant (3:1).^3,4 Rarely, malignant transformation can lead to local and distant metastasis to the lungs,^5,6 liver,⁷ and skeletal system.⁸ In cases of metastatic spread, there is an increased incidence in males versus females.^9-11

Risk Factors
Although many meningiomas are sporadic, numerous risk factors have been associated with the disease development. One study showed a link between exposure to ionizing radiation and subsequent development of meningioma.¹² Another study found a population link between a higher incidence of meningioma and nuclear exposure in Hiroshima, Japan, after the atomic bomb blast in 1980.¹³ There is an increased incidence of meningioma in patients exposed to radiography from frequent dental imaging, particularly when older machines with higher levels of radiation exposure are used.¹⁴Another study demonstrated a correlation between meningioma and hormonal factors (eg, estrogen for hormone therapy) and exacerbation of symptoms during pregnancy.¹⁵ There also is an increased incidence of meningioma in breast cancer patients.⁴ Genetic alterations also have been implicated in the development of meningioma. It was found that 50% of patients with a mutation in the neurofibromatosis 2 gene (which codes for the merlin protein) had associated meningiomas.^16,17 Scalp nodules in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 increases suspicion of a scalp meningioma and necessitates biopsy.

Clinical Presentation
Cutaneous meningiomas typically present as firm, subcutaneous nodules. Scalp nodules ranging from alopecia^18,19 to hypertrichosis²⁰ have been reported. These neoplasms can be painless or painful, depending on mass effect and location.

Classification
The primary clinical classification system of metastatic meningioma was first described in 1974.²¹ Type 1 meningioma refers to congenital lesions that tend to cluster closer to the midline. Type 2 refers to ectopic soft-tissue lesions that extend to the skin from likely remnants of arachnoid cells. These lesions are more likely to be found around the eyes, ears, nose, and mouth. Type 3 meningiomas extend from intracranial tumors that secondarily involve the skin through proliferation through bone or anatomic defects. Type 3 is the result of direct extension and the location of the cutaneous presentation depends on the location of the intracranial lesion.^4,22,23

Pathology
Meningiomas exhibit a range of morphologic appearances on histopathology. In almost all meningiomas, tumor cells are concentrically wrapped in tight whorls with round-oval nuclei and delicate chromatin, central clearing, and pale pseudonuclear inclusions. Lamellate calcifications known as psammoma bodies are a common finding. Immunohistochemical studies show that most meningiomas are positive for EMA, vimentin, and progesterone receptor. S100 protein expression, if present, usually is focal.

Differential Diagnosis
Asymptomatic nodules on the scalp may present a diagnostic challenge to physicians. Most common scalp lesions tend to be cystic or lipomatous. In children, a broad differential diagnosis should be considered, including dermoid and epidermoid tumors, dermal sinus tumors, hemangiomas, metastasis of another tumor, aplasia cutis congenita, pilomatricoma, and lipoma. In adults, the differential should focus on epidermoid cysts, lipomas, metastasis of other tumors, osteomas, arteriovenous fistulae, and heterotopic brain tissue. Often, microscopic examination is necessary, along with additional immunohistochemical staining (eg, EMA, vimentin).

Treatment
Treatment options for meningioma include observation, surgical resection, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy, as well as a combination of these modalities. The choice of therapy depends on such variables as patient age; performance status; comorbidities; presence or absence of symptoms (including focal neurologic deficits); and tumor location, size, and grade. It is important to note that there is limited knowledge looking at the results of various treatment modalities, and no consensus approach has been established.

Conclusion

Our patient’s medical history was remarkable for an intracranial meningioma 11 years prior to the current presentation, and she was found to have biopsy-proven metastatic meningioma without recurrence of the initial tumor. Patients presenting with a scalp nodule warrant a thorough medical history and consideration beyond common cysts and lipomas.

Meningiomas generally present as slow-growing, expanding intracranial lesions and are the most common benign intracranial tumor in adults.¹ Rarely, meningioma exhibits malignant potential and presents as an extracranial soft-tissue mass through extension or as a primary extracranial cutaneous neoplasm. The differential diagnosis of scalp neoplasms must be broadened to include uncommon tumors such as meningioma. We present a rare case of a 68-year-old woman with scalp metastasis of meningioma 11 years after initial resection of the primary tumor.

Case Report

A 68-year-old woman presented for evaluation of an asymptomatic nodule on the left parietal scalp of 2 years’ duration. She denied any headaches, difficulty with balance, vision changes, or changes in mentation. Her medical history was remarkable for a benign meningioma removed from the right parietal scalp 11 years prior without radiation therapy, as well as type 2 diabetes mellitus and arthritis. The patient’s son died from a brain tumor, but the exact tumor type and age at the time of death were unknown. Her current medications included metformin, insulin glargine, aspirin, and a daily multivitamin. She denied any allergies or history of smoking.

Physical examination of the scalp revealed 4 fixed, nontender, flesh-colored nodules: 2 on the left parietal scalp measuring 3.0 cm and 0.8 cm, respectively (Figure 1A); a 0.4-cm nodule on the right posterior occipital scalp; and a 1.6-cm sausage-shaped nodule on the right temple (Figure 1B). No positive lymph nodes were appreciated, and no additional lesions were noted. No additional atypical lesions were noted on full cutaneous examination.

A diagnostic 6-mm punch biopsy of the largest nodule was performed. Intraoperatively, there was no apparent cyst wall, but coiled, loose, stringlike, pink-yellow tissue was removed from the base of the wound before closing with sutures.

The primary histologic finding was cells within fibrous tissue containing delicate round-oval nuclei, inconspicuous nucleoli, and lightly eosinophilic cytoplasm with an indistinct border (Figure 2). Immunohistochemical studies for S100 protein were focal and limited to the cytoplasm of a subset of neoplastic cells (Figure 3). Tumor cells stained positive for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and were focally positive for progesterone receptor (Figure 4). Tumor cells were negative for CD31 and CD34. Based on the clinical and histologic findings, a diagnosis of metastatic meningioma of the scalp was made.

Magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography of the head, neck, and chest demonstrated 3 residual subcutaneous nodules on the scalp and an indeterminate subcentimeter nodule in the right lung. The 0.4-cm nodule on the right posterior occipital scalp was removed without complication, and no radiation therapy was administered. The rest of the lesions were monitored. She remained under the close observation of a neurosurgeon and underwent repeat imaging of the scalp nodules and lungs, initially at 3 months and then routinely at the patient’s comfort. The patient currently denies any neurologic symptoms.

Comment

Meningiomas are derived from meningothelial cells found in the leptomeninges and in the choroid plexus of the ventricles of the brain.² They are common intracranial neoplasms that generally are associated with a benign course and present during the fourth to sixth decades of life. Meningiomas constitute 13% to 30% of intracranial neoplasms and usually are female predominant (3:1).^3,4 Rarely, malignant transformation can lead to local and distant metastasis to the lungs,^5,6 liver,⁷ and skeletal system.⁸ In cases of metastatic spread, there is an increased incidence in males versus females.^9-11

Risk Factors
Although many meningiomas are sporadic, numerous risk factors have been associated with the disease development. One study showed a link between exposure to ionizing radiation and subsequent development of meningioma.¹² Another study found a population link between a higher incidence of meningioma and nuclear exposure in Hiroshima, Japan, after the atomic bomb blast in 1980.¹³ There is an increased incidence of meningioma in patients exposed to radiography from frequent dental imaging, particularly when older machines with higher levels of radiation exposure are used.¹⁴Another study demonstrated a correlation between meningioma and hormonal factors (eg, estrogen for hormone therapy) and exacerbation of symptoms during pregnancy.¹⁵ There also is an increased incidence of meningioma in breast cancer patients.⁴ Genetic alterations also have been implicated in the development of meningioma. It was found that 50% of patients with a mutation in the neurofibromatosis 2 gene (which codes for the merlin protein) had associated meningiomas.^16,17 Scalp nodules in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 increases suspicion of a scalp meningioma and necessitates biopsy.

Clinical Presentation
Cutaneous meningiomas typically present as firm, subcutaneous nodules. Scalp nodules ranging from alopecia^18,19 to hypertrichosis²⁰ have been reported. These neoplasms can be painless or painful, depending on mass effect and location.

Classification
The primary clinical classification system of metastatic meningioma was first described in 1974.²¹ Type 1 meningioma refers to congenital lesions that tend to cluster closer to the midline. Type 2 refers to ectopic soft-tissue lesions that extend to the skin from likely remnants of arachnoid cells. These lesions are more likely to be found around the eyes, ears, nose, and mouth. Type 3 meningiomas extend from intracranial tumors that secondarily involve the skin through proliferation through bone or anatomic defects. Type 3 is the result of direct extension and the location of the cutaneous presentation depends on the location of the intracranial lesion.^4,22,23

Pathology
Meningiomas exhibit a range of morphologic appearances on histopathology. In almost all meningiomas, tumor cells are concentrically wrapped in tight whorls with round-oval nuclei and delicate chromatin, central clearing, and pale pseudonuclear inclusions. Lamellate calcifications known as psammoma bodies are a common finding. Immunohistochemical studies show that most meningiomas are positive for EMA, vimentin, and progesterone receptor. S100 protein expression, if present, usually is focal.

Differential Diagnosis
Asymptomatic nodules on the scalp may present a diagnostic challenge to physicians. Most common scalp lesions tend to be cystic or lipomatous. In children, a broad differential diagnosis should be considered, including dermoid and epidermoid tumors, dermal sinus tumors, hemangiomas, metastasis of another tumor, aplasia cutis congenita, pilomatricoma, and lipoma. In adults, the differential should focus on epidermoid cysts, lipomas, metastasis of other tumors, osteomas, arteriovenous fistulae, and heterotopic brain tissue. Often, microscopic examination is necessary, along with additional immunohistochemical staining (eg, EMA, vimentin).

Treatment
Treatment options for meningioma include observation, surgical resection, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy, as well as a combination of these modalities. The choice of therapy depends on such variables as patient age; performance status; comorbidities; presence or absence of symptoms (including focal neurologic deficits); and tumor location, size, and grade. It is important to note that there is limited knowledge looking at the results of various treatment modalities, and no consensus approach has been established.

Conclusion

Our patient’s medical history was remarkable for an intracranial meningioma 11 years prior to the current presentation, and she was found to have biopsy-proven metastatic meningioma without recurrence of the initial tumor. Patients presenting with a scalp nodule warrant a thorough medical history and consideration beyond common cysts and lipomas.

Eccrine carcinomas are uncommon cutaneous neoplasms demonstrating nonuniform histologic features, behavior, and nomenclature. Given the rarity of these tumors, no known criteria by which to diagnose the tumor or guidelines for treatment have been proposed. We report a rare case of an immunocompromised patient with a primary squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma (SEDC) who was subsequently treated with radical resection and axillary dissection. It was later determined that the patient had distant metastasis of SEDC. A review of the literature on the diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance of SEDC also is provided.

Case Report

A 77-year-old man whose medical history was remarkable for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and numerous previous basal cell carcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) presented with a 5-cm, stellate, sclerotic plaque on the left chest of approximately 2 years’ duration (Figure 1) and a 3-mm pink papule on the right nasal sidewall of 2 months’ duration. Initial histology of both lesions revealed carcinoma with squamous and ductal differentiation extending from the undersurface of the epidermis, favoring a diagnosis of SEDC (Figure 2). At the time of initial presentation, the patient also had a 6-mm pink papule on the right chest of several months duration that was consistent with a well-differentiated sebaceous carcinoma on histology.

Further analysis of the lesion on the left chest revealed positive staining for cytokeratin (CK) 5/14 and p63, suggestive of a cutaneous malignancy. Staining for S100 protein highlighted rare cells in the basal layer of tumor aggregates. The immunohistochemical profile showed negative staining for CK7, CK5D3, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor 2.

Diagnosis of SEDC of the chest and nasal lesions was based on the morphologic architecture, which included ductal formation noted within the tumor. The chest lesion also had prominent squamoid differentiation. Another histologic feature consistent with SEDC was poorly demarcated, infiltrative neoplastic cells extending into the dermis and subcutis. Although there was some positive focal staining for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), variegation within the tumor and the prominent squamoid component might have contributed to this unexpected staining pattern.

The patient was admitted to the hospital for excision of the lesion on the chest wall. Initial workup revealed macrocytic anemia, which required transfusion, and an incidental finding of non–small-cell lung cancer. The chest lesion was unrelated to the non–small-cell lung cancer based on the staining profile. Material from the lung stained positive for thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) and exhibited rare staining for p63; however, the chest lesion did not stain positive for TTF-1 and had strong staining affinity for p63, indicative of a cutaneous malignancy.

The lesion on the chest wall was definitively excised. Pathologic analysis revealed a dermal-based infiltrative tumor of irregular nests and cords of squamoid cells with focal ductal formation in a fibromyxoid background stroma, suggestive of an adnexal carcinoma with a considerable degree of squamous differentiation and favoring a diagnosis of SEDC. Focal perineural invasion was noted, but no lymphovascular spread was identified; however, metastasis was identified in 1 of 26 axillary lymph nodes. The patient underwent 9 sessions of radiation therapy for the lung cancer and also was given cetuximab.

Three months later, the nasal tumor was subsequently excised in an outpatient procedure, and the final biopsy report indicated a diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma. One-and-a-half years later, in follow-up with surgery after removal of the chest lesion, a 2×3-cm mass was excised from the left neck that demonstrated lymph nodes consistent with metastatic SEDC. Careful evaluation of this patient, including family history and genetic screening, was considered. Our patient continues to follow-up with the dermatology department every 3 months. He has been doing well and has had multiple additional primary SCCs in the subsequent 5 years of follow-up.

 

Comment

Eccrine carcinoma is the most common subtype of adnexal carcinoma, representing 0.01% of all cutaneous tumors.¹ Squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma is rare, with as few as 13 cases reported in the literature; 3 of these patients were treated with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS).^1,2 Recently, two series of 7 and 30 cases, respectively, were longitudinally followed and described.^3,4 We report an additional rare case of SEDC in an immunocompromised patient with distant metastases that was treated with radical resection and axillary dissection.

Eccrine carcinoma is observed clinically as a slow-growing, nodular plaque on the scalp, arms, legs, or trunk in middle-aged and elderly individuals.¹ Squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma also has been reported in a young woman.⁵ Another immunocompromised patient was identified in the literature with a great toe lesion that showed follicular differentiation along with the usual SEDC features of squamoid and ductal differentiation.⁶ The etiology of SEDC is controversial but is thought to be an SCC arising from eccrine glands, a subtype of eccrine carcinoma with extensive squamoid differentiation, or a biphenotypic carcinoma.^1,7

Histologically, SEDC is poorly circumscribed with an infiltrative growth pattern and deep extension into the dermis and subcutaneous tissue. The lesion is characterized by prominent squamous epithelial proliferation superficially with cellular atypia, keratinous cyst formation, squamous eddies, and eccrine ductal differentiation.¹

The differential diagnosis of SEDC includes SCC; metastatic carcinoma with squamoid features; and eccrine tumors, including eccrine poroma, microcystic adnexal carcinoma, and porocarcinoma with squamous differentiation.¹

Immunohistochemistry has a role in the diagnosis of SEDC. Findings include positive staining for S100 protein, EMA, CKs, and CEA. Glandular tissue stains positive for EMA and CEA, supporting an adnexal origin.¹ Positivity for p63 and CK5/6 supports the conclusion that this is a primary cutaneous malignancy, not a metastatic disease.¹

Squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma has an indeterminate malignant potential. There is a disparity of clinical behavior between SCC and eccrine cancers; however, because squamous differentiation sometimes dominates the histological picture, eccrine carcinomas can be misdiagnosed as SCC.^1,8 Eccrine adnexal tumors are characterized by multiple local recurrences (70%–80% of cases); perineural invasion; and metastasis (50% of cases) to regional lymph nodes and viscera, including the lungs, liver, bones, and brain.¹ Squamous cell carcinoma, however, has a markedly lower recurrence rate (3.1%–18.7% of cases) and rate of metastasis (5.2%–37.8%).¹

Squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma is classified as one of the less aggressive eccrine tumors, although the low number of cases makes it a controversial conclusion.¹ To our knowledge, no cases of SEDC metastasis have been reported with SEDC. Recurrence of SEDC has been reported locally, and perineural or perivascular invasion (or both) has been demonstrated in 3 cases.¹

Since SEDC has invasive and metastatic potential, as demonstrated in our case, along with elevated local recurrence rates, physicians must be able to properly diagnose this rare entity and recommend an appropriate surgical modality. Due to the low incidence of SEDC, there are no known randomized studies comparing treatment modalities.¹ Other works in the literature have suggested treating SEDC with the same approach as lesions with similar histologic features and behavior, such as eccrine carcinoma and SCC.^1,5-7

Surgical extirpation with complete margin examination is recommended, as SEDC tends to be underestimated in size, is aggressive in its infiltration, and is predisposed to perineural and perivascular invasion. The literature has shown that MMS has demonstrated lower recurrence rates (3.1%–5%) than other treatments at 5-year follow-up for SCC and (0%–5%) for eccrine carcinoma (average follow-up, 31 months).^1,5 Further studies are needed to understand the clinical progression of SEDC, and more experience is necessary with close follow-up of this subset of patients. Follow-up is determined at the present time from anecdotal experience and patient history.

Along with the rarity of SEDC in our patient, the simultaneous occurrence of 3 primary malignancies also is unusual. Patients with CLL have progressive defects of cell- and humoral-mediated immunity, causing immunosuppression. In a retrospective study, Tsimberidou et al⁹ reviewed the records of 2028 untreated CLL patients and determined that 27% had another primary malignancy, including skin (30%) and lung cancers (6%), which were two of the malignancies seen in our patient. The investigators concluded that patients with CLL have more than twice the risk of developing a second primary malignancy and an increased frequency of certain cancer types.⁹ Furthermore, treatment regimens for CLL have been considered to increase cell- and humoral-mediated immune defects at specific cancer sites,¹⁰ although the exact mechanism of this action is unknown. Development of a second primary malignancy (or even a third) in patients with SEDC is increasingly being reported in CLL patients.^9,10

A high index of suspicion with SEDC in the differential diagnosis should be maintained in elderly men with slow-growing, solitary, nodular lesions of the scalp, nose, arms, legs, or trunk.

Eccrine carcinomas are uncommon cutaneous neoplasms demonstrating nonuniform histologic features, behavior, and nomenclature. Given the rarity of these tumors, no known criteria by which to diagnose the tumor or guidelines for treatment have been proposed. We report a rare case of an immunocompromised patient with a primary squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma (SEDC) who was subsequently treated with radical resection and axillary dissection. It was later determined that the patient had distant metastasis of SEDC. A review of the literature on the diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance of SEDC also is provided.

Case Report

A 77-year-old man whose medical history was remarkable for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and numerous previous basal cell carcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) presented with a 5-cm, stellate, sclerotic plaque on the left chest of approximately 2 years’ duration (Figure 1) and a 3-mm pink papule on the right nasal sidewall of 2 months’ duration. Initial histology of both lesions revealed carcinoma with squamous and ductal differentiation extending from the undersurface of the epidermis, favoring a diagnosis of SEDC (Figure 2). At the time of initial presentation, the patient also had a 6-mm pink papule on the right chest of several months duration that was consistent with a well-differentiated sebaceous carcinoma on histology.

Further analysis of the lesion on the left chest revealed positive staining for cytokeratin (CK) 5/14 and p63, suggestive of a cutaneous malignancy. Staining for S100 protein highlighted rare cells in the basal layer of tumor aggregates. The immunohistochemical profile showed negative staining for CK7, CK5D3, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor 2.

Diagnosis of SEDC of the chest and nasal lesions was based on the morphologic architecture, which included ductal formation noted within the tumor. The chest lesion also had prominent squamoid differentiation. Another histologic feature consistent with SEDC was poorly demarcated, infiltrative neoplastic cells extending into the dermis and subcutis. Although there was some positive focal staining for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), variegation within the tumor and the prominent squamoid component might have contributed to this unexpected staining pattern.

The patient was admitted to the hospital for excision of the lesion on the chest wall. Initial workup revealed macrocytic anemia, which required transfusion, and an incidental finding of non–small-cell lung cancer. The chest lesion was unrelated to the non–small-cell lung cancer based on the staining profile. Material from the lung stained positive for thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) and exhibited rare staining for p63; however, the chest lesion did not stain positive for TTF-1 and had strong staining affinity for p63, indicative of a cutaneous malignancy.

The lesion on the chest wall was definitively excised. Pathologic analysis revealed a dermal-based infiltrative tumor of irregular nests and cords of squamoid cells with focal ductal formation in a fibromyxoid background stroma, suggestive of an adnexal carcinoma with a considerable degree of squamous differentiation and favoring a diagnosis of SEDC. Focal perineural invasion was noted, but no lymphovascular spread was identified; however, metastasis was identified in 1 of 26 axillary lymph nodes. The patient underwent 9 sessions of radiation therapy for the lung cancer and also was given cetuximab.

Three months later, the nasal tumor was subsequently excised in an outpatient procedure, and the final biopsy report indicated a diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma. One-and-a-half years later, in follow-up with surgery after removal of the chest lesion, a 2×3-cm mass was excised from the left neck that demonstrated lymph nodes consistent with metastatic SEDC. Careful evaluation of this patient, including family history and genetic screening, was considered. Our patient continues to follow-up with the dermatology department every 3 months. He has been doing well and has had multiple additional primary SCCs in the subsequent 5 years of follow-up.

 

Comment

Eccrine carcinoma is the most common subtype of adnexal carcinoma, representing 0.01% of all cutaneous tumors.¹ Squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma is rare, with as few as 13 cases reported in the literature; 3 of these patients were treated with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS).^1,2 Recently, two series of 7 and 30 cases, respectively, were longitudinally followed and described.^3,4 We report an additional rare case of SEDC in an immunocompromised patient with distant metastases that was treated with radical resection and axillary dissection.

Eccrine carcinoma is observed clinically as a slow-growing, nodular plaque on the scalp, arms, legs, or trunk in middle-aged and elderly individuals.¹ Squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma also has been reported in a young woman.⁵ Another immunocompromised patient was identified in the literature with a great toe lesion that showed follicular differentiation along with the usual SEDC features of squamoid and ductal differentiation.⁶ The etiology of SEDC is controversial but is thought to be an SCC arising from eccrine glands, a subtype of eccrine carcinoma with extensive squamoid differentiation, or a biphenotypic carcinoma.^1,7

Histologically, SEDC is poorly circumscribed with an infiltrative growth pattern and deep extension into the dermis and subcutaneous tissue. The lesion is characterized by prominent squamous epithelial proliferation superficially with cellular atypia, keratinous cyst formation, squamous eddies, and eccrine ductal differentiation.¹

The differential diagnosis of SEDC includes SCC; metastatic carcinoma with squamoid features; and eccrine tumors, including eccrine poroma, microcystic adnexal carcinoma, and porocarcinoma with squamous differentiation.¹

Immunohistochemistry has a role in the diagnosis of SEDC. Findings include positive staining for S100 protein, EMA, CKs, and CEA. Glandular tissue stains positive for EMA and CEA, supporting an adnexal origin.¹ Positivity for p63 and CK5/6 supports the conclusion that this is a primary cutaneous malignancy, not a metastatic disease.¹

Squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma has an indeterminate malignant potential. There is a disparity of clinical behavior between SCC and eccrine cancers; however, because squamous differentiation sometimes dominates the histological picture, eccrine carcinomas can be misdiagnosed as SCC.^1,8 Eccrine adnexal tumors are characterized by multiple local recurrences (70%–80% of cases); perineural invasion; and metastasis (50% of cases) to regional lymph nodes and viscera, including the lungs, liver, bones, and brain.¹ Squamous cell carcinoma, however, has a markedly lower recurrence rate (3.1%–18.7% of cases) and rate of metastasis (5.2%–37.8%).¹

Squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma is classified as one of the less aggressive eccrine tumors, although the low number of cases makes it a controversial conclusion.¹ To our knowledge, no cases of SEDC metastasis have been reported with SEDC. Recurrence of SEDC has been reported locally, and perineural or perivascular invasion (or both) has been demonstrated in 3 cases.¹

Since SEDC has invasive and metastatic potential, as demonstrated in our case, along with elevated local recurrence rates, physicians must be able to properly diagnose this rare entity and recommend an appropriate surgical modality. Due to the low incidence of SEDC, there are no known randomized studies comparing treatment modalities.¹ Other works in the literature have suggested treating SEDC with the same approach as lesions with similar histologic features and behavior, such as eccrine carcinoma and SCC.^1,5-7

Surgical extirpation with complete margin examination is recommended, as SEDC tends to be underestimated in size, is aggressive in its infiltration, and is predisposed to perineural and perivascular invasion. The literature has shown that MMS has demonstrated lower recurrence rates (3.1%–5%) than other treatments at 5-year follow-up for SCC and (0%–5%) for eccrine carcinoma (average follow-up, 31 months).^1,5 Further studies are needed to understand the clinical progression of SEDC, and more experience is necessary with close follow-up of this subset of patients. Follow-up is determined at the present time from anecdotal experience and patient history.

Along with the rarity of SEDC in our patient, the simultaneous occurrence of 3 primary malignancies also is unusual. Patients with CLL have progressive defects of cell- and humoral-mediated immunity, causing immunosuppression. In a retrospective study, Tsimberidou et al⁹ reviewed the records of 2028 untreated CLL patients and determined that 27% had another primary malignancy, including skin (30%) and lung cancers (6%), which were two of the malignancies seen in our patient. The investigators concluded that patients with CLL have more than twice the risk of developing a second primary malignancy and an increased frequency of certain cancer types.⁹ Furthermore, treatment regimens for CLL have been considered to increase cell- and humoral-mediated immune defects at specific cancer sites,¹⁰ although the exact mechanism of this action is unknown. Development of a second primary malignancy (or even a third) in patients with SEDC is increasingly being reported in CLL patients.^9,10

A high index of suspicion with SEDC in the differential diagnosis should be maintained in elderly men with slow-growing, solitary, nodular lesions of the scalp, nose, arms, legs, or trunk.

Eccrine carcinomas are uncommon cutaneous neoplasms demonstrating nonuniform histologic features, behavior, and nomenclature. Given the rarity of these tumors, no known criteria by which to diagnose the tumor or guidelines for treatment have been proposed. We report a rare case of an immunocompromised patient with a primary squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma (SEDC) who was subsequently treated with radical resection and axillary dissection. It was later determined that the patient had distant metastasis of SEDC. A review of the literature on the diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance of SEDC also is provided.

Case Report

A 77-year-old man whose medical history was remarkable for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and numerous previous basal cell carcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) presented with a 5-cm, stellate, sclerotic plaque on the left chest of approximately 2 years’ duration (Figure 1) and a 3-mm pink papule on the right nasal sidewall of 2 months’ duration. Initial histology of both lesions revealed carcinoma with squamous and ductal differentiation extending from the undersurface of the epidermis, favoring a diagnosis of SEDC (Figure 2). At the time of initial presentation, the patient also had a 6-mm pink papule on the right chest of several months duration that was consistent with a well-differentiated sebaceous carcinoma on histology.

Further analysis of the lesion on the left chest revealed positive staining for cytokeratin (CK) 5/14 and p63, suggestive of a cutaneous malignancy. Staining for S100 protein highlighted rare cells in the basal layer of tumor aggregates. The immunohistochemical profile showed negative staining for CK7, CK5D3, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor 2.

Diagnosis of SEDC of the chest and nasal lesions was based on the morphologic architecture, which included ductal formation noted within the tumor. The chest lesion also had prominent squamoid differentiation. Another histologic feature consistent with SEDC was poorly demarcated, infiltrative neoplastic cells extending into the dermis and subcutis. Although there was some positive focal staining for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), variegation within the tumor and the prominent squamoid component might have contributed to this unexpected staining pattern.

The patient was admitted to the hospital for excision of the lesion on the chest wall. Initial workup revealed macrocytic anemia, which required transfusion, and an incidental finding of non–small-cell lung cancer. The chest lesion was unrelated to the non–small-cell lung cancer based on the staining profile. Material from the lung stained positive for thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) and exhibited rare staining for p63; however, the chest lesion did not stain positive for TTF-1 and had strong staining affinity for p63, indicative of a cutaneous malignancy.

The lesion on the chest wall was definitively excised. Pathologic analysis revealed a dermal-based infiltrative tumor of irregular nests and cords of squamoid cells with focal ductal formation in a fibromyxoid background stroma, suggestive of an adnexal carcinoma with a considerable degree of squamous differentiation and favoring a diagnosis of SEDC. Focal perineural invasion was noted, but no lymphovascular spread was identified; however, metastasis was identified in 1 of 26 axillary lymph nodes. The patient underwent 9 sessions of radiation therapy for the lung cancer and also was given cetuximab.

Three months later, the nasal tumor was subsequently excised in an outpatient procedure, and the final biopsy report indicated a diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma. One-and-a-half years later, in follow-up with surgery after removal of the chest lesion, a 2×3-cm mass was excised from the left neck that demonstrated lymph nodes consistent with metastatic SEDC. Careful evaluation of this patient, including family history and genetic screening, was considered. Our patient continues to follow-up with the dermatology department every 3 months. He has been doing well and has had multiple additional primary SCCs in the subsequent 5 years of follow-up.

 

Comment

Eccrine carcinoma is the most common subtype of adnexal carcinoma, representing 0.01% of all cutaneous tumors.¹ Squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma is rare, with as few as 13 cases reported in the literature; 3 of these patients were treated with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS).^1,2 Recently, two series of 7 and 30 cases, respectively, were longitudinally followed and described.^3,4 We report an additional rare case of SEDC in an immunocompromised patient with distant metastases that was treated with radical resection and axillary dissection.

Eccrine carcinoma is observed clinically as a slow-growing, nodular plaque on the scalp, arms, legs, or trunk in middle-aged and elderly individuals.¹ Squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma also has been reported in a young woman.⁵ Another immunocompromised patient was identified in the literature with a great toe lesion that showed follicular differentiation along with the usual SEDC features of squamoid and ductal differentiation.⁶ The etiology of SEDC is controversial but is thought to be an SCC arising from eccrine glands, a subtype of eccrine carcinoma with extensive squamoid differentiation, or a biphenotypic carcinoma.^1,7

Histologically, SEDC is poorly circumscribed with an infiltrative growth pattern and deep extension into the dermis and subcutaneous tissue. The lesion is characterized by prominent squamous epithelial proliferation superficially with cellular atypia, keratinous cyst formation, squamous eddies, and eccrine ductal differentiation.¹

The differential diagnosis of SEDC includes SCC; metastatic carcinoma with squamoid features; and eccrine tumors, including eccrine poroma, microcystic adnexal carcinoma, and porocarcinoma with squamous differentiation.¹

Immunohistochemistry has a role in the diagnosis of SEDC. Findings include positive staining for S100 protein, EMA, CKs, and CEA. Glandular tissue stains positive for EMA and CEA, supporting an adnexal origin.¹ Positivity for p63 and CK5/6 supports the conclusion that this is a primary cutaneous malignancy, not a metastatic disease.¹

Squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma has an indeterminate malignant potential. There is a disparity of clinical behavior between SCC and eccrine cancers; however, because squamous differentiation sometimes dominates the histological picture, eccrine carcinomas can be misdiagnosed as SCC.^1,8 Eccrine adnexal tumors are characterized by multiple local recurrences (70%–80% of cases); perineural invasion; and metastasis (50% of cases) to regional lymph nodes and viscera, including the lungs, liver, bones, and brain.¹ Squamous cell carcinoma, however, has a markedly lower recurrence rate (3.1%–18.7% of cases) and rate of metastasis (5.2%–37.8%).¹

Squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma is classified as one of the less aggressive eccrine tumors, although the low number of cases makes it a controversial conclusion.¹ To our knowledge, no cases of SEDC metastasis have been reported with SEDC. Recurrence of SEDC has been reported locally, and perineural or perivascular invasion (or both) has been demonstrated in 3 cases.¹

Since SEDC has invasive and metastatic potential, as demonstrated in our case, along with elevated local recurrence rates, physicians must be able to properly diagnose this rare entity and recommend an appropriate surgical modality. Due to the low incidence of SEDC, there are no known randomized studies comparing treatment modalities.¹ Other works in the literature have suggested treating SEDC with the same approach as lesions with similar histologic features and behavior, such as eccrine carcinoma and SCC.^1,5-7

Surgical extirpation with complete margin examination is recommended, as SEDC tends to be underestimated in size, is aggressive in its infiltration, and is predisposed to perineural and perivascular invasion. The literature has shown that MMS has demonstrated lower recurrence rates (3.1%–5%) than other treatments at 5-year follow-up for SCC and (0%–5%) for eccrine carcinoma (average follow-up, 31 months).^1,5 Further studies are needed to understand the clinical progression of SEDC, and more experience is necessary with close follow-up of this subset of patients. Follow-up is determined at the present time from anecdotal experience and patient history.

Along with the rarity of SEDC in our patient, the simultaneous occurrence of 3 primary malignancies also is unusual. Patients with CLL have progressive defects of cell- and humoral-mediated immunity, causing immunosuppression. In a retrospective study, Tsimberidou et al⁹ reviewed the records of 2028 untreated CLL patients and determined that 27% had another primary malignancy, including skin (30%) and lung cancers (6%), which were two of the malignancies seen in our patient. The investigators concluded that patients with CLL have more than twice the risk of developing a second primary malignancy and an increased frequency of certain cancer types.⁹ Furthermore, treatment regimens for CLL have been considered to increase cell- and humoral-mediated immune defects at specific cancer sites,¹⁰ although the exact mechanism of this action is unknown. Development of a second primary malignancy (or even a third) in patients with SEDC is increasingly being reported in CLL patients.^9,10

A high index of suspicion with SEDC in the differential diagnosis should be maintained in elderly men with slow-growing, solitary, nodular lesions of the scalp, nose, arms, legs, or trunk.

Case Report

A 62-year-old black man presented for examination of a dark longitudinal streak located adjacent to the lateral nail fold on the third finger of the left hand. The lesion had been present for several months, during which time it had slowly expanded in size. The fingertip had recently become tender, which interfered with the patient’s ability to work. His past medical history was remarkable for end-stage renal disease secondary to glomerulonephritis with nephrotic syndrome of unclear etiology. He initially was treated by an outside physician using peritoneal dialysis for 3 years until he underwent renal transplantation in 2004 with a cadaveric organ. Other remarkable medical conditions included posttransplantation diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and gout. His multidrug regimen included 2 immunosuppressive medications: oral cyclosporine 125 mg twice daily and oral mycophenolate mofetil 250 mg twice daily.

A broad, irregular, black, pigmented, subungual band was noted on the left third finger. The lesion appeared to emanate from below the nail cuticle and traveled along the nail longitudinally toward the distal tip. The band appeared darker at the edge adjacent to the lateral nail fold and grew lighter near the middle of the nail where its free edge was noted to be irregular. A slightly thickened lateral nail fold with an irregular, small, sawtoothlike hyperkeratosis and hyperpigmentation also was noted (Figure 1).

Subungual melanoma, onychomycosis, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and a verruca copresenting with onychomycosis were considered in the differential diagnosis. The patient underwent nail avulsion and biopsy of the nail bed as well as the nail matrix. Histopathology was notable for malignant dyskeratosis with a lack of nuclear maturation, occasional mitoses, multinucleation, and individual cell keratinization (Figure 2). Immunostaining for S100 was negative, while staining for cytokeratins AE1/AE3 was positive. Deposition of melanin pigment in the malignant dyskeratotic cells was noted. Periodic acid–Schiff staining identified pseudohyphae without invasion of the nail plate. A diagnosis of pigmented SCC (pSCC) was made. The patient’s nail also was sent for fungal cultures that later grew Candida glabrata and Candida parapsilosis.

The patient underwent Mohs micrographic surgery for removal of the pSCC, which was found to be more extensive than originally suspected and required en bloc excision of the nail repaired with a full-thickness skin graft from the left forearm. The area healed well with some hyperpigmentation (Figure 3).

 

Comment

Among the various types of skin cancer, an estimated 700,000 patients are diagnosed with SCC annually, making it the second most common form of skin cancer in the United States.¹ Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin cancer among whites in the United States, while in contrast SCC is the most common skin cancer in patients with skin of color.² Only an estimated 2% to 5% of all SCCs are pigmented, and this variant is more commonly seen in patients with skin of color.^3-5 One analysis of 52 cases of pSCC showed that common features included a flat or slightly raised appearance and hyperpigmentation with varying levels of scaling.⁶ Studies have shown an altered presentation of pSCC in black skin with increased melanin production and thickness of the stratum corneum in contrast with cases seen in white patients.⁷ Other potential features include scaling, erosive changes, and sharply demarcated borders. Squamous cell carcinoma typically occurs in sun-exposed areas, reflecting its association with UV light damage; however, SCC in skin of color patients has been noted to occur in sun-protected areas and in areas of chronic scarring.⁸ Pigmented SCC also appears to follow this distribution, as affected areas are not necessarily in direct exposure to the sun. Pigmented SCCs have been associated with pruritus and/or burning pain, which also was seen in our case when our patient complained of tenderness at the site.

We describe the case of a subungual pSCC clinically presenting as longitudinal melanonychia. Pigmented SCC presenting as longitudinal melanonychia was first described by Baran and Simon in 1988.⁹ Since that time, it has been reported that approximately 10% of subungual pSCCs clinically present as longitudinal melanonychia.^10,11 A retrospective study reviewing 35 cases of SCC of the nail apparatus found that 5 (14.3%) cases presented as longitudinal melanonychia.¹⁰ Another retrospective study found that 6 of 51 (11.8%) cases of SCCs affecting the nail unit presented as the warty type of SCC in association with longitudinal melanonychia.¹² Cases of pSCC in situ appearing as longitudinal melanonychia also have been reported.^13,14

Risk factors for the development of pSCC include advanced age, male sex, presence of human papilloma virus, and use of immunosuppressants.¹⁵ Male predominance and advanced age at the time of diagnosis (mean age, 67 years) have been observed in pSCC cases.¹⁶ It is now well established that renal transplant recipients have an increased risk of SCC, with a reported incidence rate of 5% to 6%.¹⁶ When these patients develop an SCC, they typically follow a more aggressive course. Renal transplantation has a higher ratio than cardiac transplantation for SCC development (2.37:1), whereas cardiac transplantation is associated with a higher risk of BCC development.¹⁷ A study of 384 transplant recipients found that 96 (25.0%) had a postsurgical nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), with a ratio of SCC to BCC of 1.2:1.¹⁶ The calculated incidence of NMSC at 10 and 20 years posttransplantation was 24.2% and 54.4%, respectively. Another study also determined that SCC rates (50.0%) in postrenal transplant recipients were approximately twice that of BCC (27.0%).¹⁸

A daily regimen of immunosuppressive medications such as cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil showed an increased risk for development of NMSC.¹⁵ Immunosuppressive medications play an important role in the pathogenesis of SCC due to a direct oncogenic effect as well as impairment of the immune system’s ability to fight precancerous developments.¹⁵ A 4-year study of 100 renal transplant recipients using mycophenolate mofetil as part of an immunosuppressive regimen reported 22% NMSC findings among 9 patients.¹⁹ On average, patients developed an NMSC approximately 61 months posttransplantation, with a wide range from 2 to 120 months.

Advanced age was another important risk factor, with each decade of life producing a 60% increase in instantaneous risk of SCC development for transplant recipients.¹⁵ A steady increase in risk was related to the length of time adhering to an immunosuppressive regimen, especially from 2 to 6 years, and then remaining constant in subsequent years. For older patients on immunosuppressant regimens for more than 8 years, the calculated relative risk was noted to be over 200 times greater than the normal population’s development of skin cancers.¹⁸

Conclusion

Although cases of pSCC presenting as longitudinal melanonychia have previously been reported,^9-14,20 our case is unique in that it describes pSCC in a renal transplant recipient. Our patient had many of the known risk factors for the development of pSCC including male sex, advanced age, skin of color, history of renal transplantation, and immunosuppressive therapy. Although regular full-body skin examinations are an accepted part of renal transplantation follow-up due to SCC risk, our case emphasizes the need to remain vigilant due to possible atypical presentations among the immunosuppressed. The nail unit should not be overlooked during the clinical examination of renal transplant recipients as demonstrated by our patient’s rare presentation of pSCC in the nail.

Case Report

A 62-year-old black man presented for examination of a dark longitudinal streak located adjacent to the lateral nail fold on the third finger of the left hand. The lesion had been present for several months, during which time it had slowly expanded in size. The fingertip had recently become tender, which interfered with the patient’s ability to work. His past medical history was remarkable for end-stage renal disease secondary to glomerulonephritis with nephrotic syndrome of unclear etiology. He initially was treated by an outside physician using peritoneal dialysis for 3 years until he underwent renal transplantation in 2004 with a cadaveric organ. Other remarkable medical conditions included posttransplantation diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and gout. His multidrug regimen included 2 immunosuppressive medications: oral cyclosporine 125 mg twice daily and oral mycophenolate mofetil 250 mg twice daily.

A broad, irregular, black, pigmented, subungual band was noted on the left third finger. The lesion appeared to emanate from below the nail cuticle and traveled along the nail longitudinally toward the distal tip. The band appeared darker at the edge adjacent to the lateral nail fold and grew lighter near the middle of the nail where its free edge was noted to be irregular. A slightly thickened lateral nail fold with an irregular, small, sawtoothlike hyperkeratosis and hyperpigmentation also was noted (Figure 1).

Subungual melanoma, onychomycosis, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and a verruca copresenting with onychomycosis were considered in the differential diagnosis. The patient underwent nail avulsion and biopsy of the nail bed as well as the nail matrix. Histopathology was notable for malignant dyskeratosis with a lack of nuclear maturation, occasional mitoses, multinucleation, and individual cell keratinization (Figure 2). Immunostaining for S100 was negative, while staining for cytokeratins AE1/AE3 was positive. Deposition of melanin pigment in the malignant dyskeratotic cells was noted. Periodic acid–Schiff staining identified pseudohyphae without invasion of the nail plate. A diagnosis of pigmented SCC (pSCC) was made. The patient’s nail also was sent for fungal cultures that later grew Candida glabrata and Candida parapsilosis.

The patient underwent Mohs micrographic surgery for removal of the pSCC, which was found to be more extensive than originally suspected and required en bloc excision of the nail repaired with a full-thickness skin graft from the left forearm. The area healed well with some hyperpigmentation (Figure 3).

 

Comment

Among the various types of skin cancer, an estimated 700,000 patients are diagnosed with SCC annually, making it the second most common form of skin cancer in the United States.¹ Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin cancer among whites in the United States, while in contrast SCC is the most common skin cancer in patients with skin of color.² Only an estimated 2% to 5% of all SCCs are pigmented, and this variant is more commonly seen in patients with skin of color.^3-5 One analysis of 52 cases of pSCC showed that common features included a flat or slightly raised appearance and hyperpigmentation with varying levels of scaling.⁶ Studies have shown an altered presentation of pSCC in black skin with increased melanin production and thickness of the stratum corneum in contrast with cases seen in white patients.⁷ Other potential features include scaling, erosive changes, and sharply demarcated borders. Squamous cell carcinoma typically occurs in sun-exposed areas, reflecting its association with UV light damage; however, SCC in skin of color patients has been noted to occur in sun-protected areas and in areas of chronic scarring.⁸ Pigmented SCC also appears to follow this distribution, as affected areas are not necessarily in direct exposure to the sun. Pigmented SCCs have been associated with pruritus and/or burning pain, which also was seen in our case when our patient complained of tenderness at the site.

We describe the case of a subungual pSCC clinically presenting as longitudinal melanonychia. Pigmented SCC presenting as longitudinal melanonychia was first described by Baran and Simon in 1988.⁹ Since that time, it has been reported that approximately 10% of subungual pSCCs clinically present as longitudinal melanonychia.^10,11 A retrospective study reviewing 35 cases of SCC of the nail apparatus found that 5 (14.3%) cases presented as longitudinal melanonychia.¹⁰ Another retrospective study found that 6 of 51 (11.8%) cases of SCCs affecting the nail unit presented as the warty type of SCC in association with longitudinal melanonychia.¹² Cases of pSCC in situ appearing as longitudinal melanonychia also have been reported.^13,14

Risk factors for the development of pSCC include advanced age, male sex, presence of human papilloma virus, and use of immunosuppressants.¹⁵ Male predominance and advanced age at the time of diagnosis (mean age, 67 years) have been observed in pSCC cases.¹⁶ It is now well established that renal transplant recipients have an increased risk of SCC, with a reported incidence rate of 5% to 6%.¹⁶ When these patients develop an SCC, they typically follow a more aggressive course. Renal transplantation has a higher ratio than cardiac transplantation for SCC development (2.37:1), whereas cardiac transplantation is associated with a higher risk of BCC development.¹⁷ A study of 384 transplant recipients found that 96 (25.0%) had a postsurgical nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), with a ratio of SCC to BCC of 1.2:1.¹⁶ The calculated incidence of NMSC at 10 and 20 years posttransplantation was 24.2% and 54.4%, respectively. Another study also determined that SCC rates (50.0%) in postrenal transplant recipients were approximately twice that of BCC (27.0%).¹⁸

A daily regimen of immunosuppressive medications such as cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil showed an increased risk for development of NMSC.¹⁵ Immunosuppressive medications play an important role in the pathogenesis of SCC due to a direct oncogenic effect as well as impairment of the immune system’s ability to fight precancerous developments.¹⁵ A 4-year study of 100 renal transplant recipients using mycophenolate mofetil as part of an immunosuppressive regimen reported 22% NMSC findings among 9 patients.¹⁹ On average, patients developed an NMSC approximately 61 months posttransplantation, with a wide range from 2 to 120 months.

Advanced age was another important risk factor, with each decade of life producing a 60% increase in instantaneous risk of SCC development for transplant recipients.¹⁵ A steady increase in risk was related to the length of time adhering to an immunosuppressive regimen, especially from 2 to 6 years, and then remaining constant in subsequent years. For older patients on immunosuppressant regimens for more than 8 years, the calculated relative risk was noted to be over 200 times greater than the normal population’s development of skin cancers.¹⁸

Conclusion

Although cases of pSCC presenting as longitudinal melanonychia have previously been reported,^9-14,20 our case is unique in that it describes pSCC in a renal transplant recipient. Our patient had many of the known risk factors for the development of pSCC including male sex, advanced age, skin of color, history of renal transplantation, and immunosuppressive therapy. Although regular full-body skin examinations are an accepted part of renal transplantation follow-up due to SCC risk, our case emphasizes the need to remain vigilant due to possible atypical presentations among the immunosuppressed. The nail unit should not be overlooked during the clinical examination of renal transplant recipients as demonstrated by our patient’s rare presentation of pSCC in the nail.

Case Report

A 62-year-old black man presented for examination of a dark longitudinal streak located adjacent to the lateral nail fold on the third finger of the left hand. The lesion had been present for several months, during which time it had slowly expanded in size. The fingertip had recently become tender, which interfered with the patient’s ability to work. His past medical history was remarkable for end-stage renal disease secondary to glomerulonephritis with nephrotic syndrome of unclear etiology. He initially was treated by an outside physician using peritoneal dialysis for 3 years until he underwent renal transplantation in 2004 with a cadaveric organ. Other remarkable medical conditions included posttransplantation diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and gout. His multidrug regimen included 2 immunosuppressive medications: oral cyclosporine 125 mg twice daily and oral mycophenolate mofetil 250 mg twice daily.

A broad, irregular, black, pigmented, subungual band was noted on the left third finger. The lesion appeared to emanate from below the nail cuticle and traveled along the nail longitudinally toward the distal tip. The band appeared darker at the edge adjacent to the lateral nail fold and grew lighter near the middle of the nail where its free edge was noted to be irregular. A slightly thickened lateral nail fold with an irregular, small, sawtoothlike hyperkeratosis and hyperpigmentation also was noted (Figure 1).

Subungual melanoma, onychomycosis, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and a verruca copresenting with onychomycosis were considered in the differential diagnosis. The patient underwent nail avulsion and biopsy of the nail bed as well as the nail matrix. Histopathology was notable for malignant dyskeratosis with a lack of nuclear maturation, occasional mitoses, multinucleation, and individual cell keratinization (Figure 2). Immunostaining for S100 was negative, while staining for cytokeratins AE1/AE3 was positive. Deposition of melanin pigment in the malignant dyskeratotic cells was noted. Periodic acid–Schiff staining identified pseudohyphae without invasion of the nail plate. A diagnosis of pigmented SCC (pSCC) was made. The patient’s nail also was sent for fungal cultures that later grew Candida glabrata and Candida parapsilosis.

The patient underwent Mohs micrographic surgery for removal of the pSCC, which was found to be more extensive than originally suspected and required en bloc excision of the nail repaired with a full-thickness skin graft from the left forearm. The area healed well with some hyperpigmentation (Figure 3).

 

Comment

Among the various types of skin cancer, an estimated 700,000 patients are diagnosed with SCC annually, making it the second most common form of skin cancer in the United States.¹ Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin cancer among whites in the United States, while in contrast SCC is the most common skin cancer in patients with skin of color.² Only an estimated 2% to 5% of all SCCs are pigmented, and this variant is more commonly seen in patients with skin of color.^3-5 One analysis of 52 cases of pSCC showed that common features included a flat or slightly raised appearance and hyperpigmentation with varying levels of scaling.⁶ Studies have shown an altered presentation of pSCC in black skin with increased melanin production and thickness of the stratum corneum in contrast with cases seen in white patients.⁷ Other potential features include scaling, erosive changes, and sharply demarcated borders. Squamous cell carcinoma typically occurs in sun-exposed areas, reflecting its association with UV light damage; however, SCC in skin of color patients has been noted to occur in sun-protected areas and in areas of chronic scarring.⁸ Pigmented SCC also appears to follow this distribution, as affected areas are not necessarily in direct exposure to the sun. Pigmented SCCs have been associated with pruritus and/or burning pain, which also was seen in our case when our patient complained of tenderness at the site.

We describe the case of a subungual pSCC clinically presenting as longitudinal melanonychia. Pigmented SCC presenting as longitudinal melanonychia was first described by Baran and Simon in 1988.⁹ Since that time, it has been reported that approximately 10% of subungual pSCCs clinically present as longitudinal melanonychia.^10,11 A retrospective study reviewing 35 cases of SCC of the nail apparatus found that 5 (14.3%) cases presented as longitudinal melanonychia.¹⁰ Another retrospective study found that 6 of 51 (11.8%) cases of SCCs affecting the nail unit presented as the warty type of SCC in association with longitudinal melanonychia.¹² Cases of pSCC in situ appearing as longitudinal melanonychia also have been reported.^13,14

Risk factors for the development of pSCC include advanced age, male sex, presence of human papilloma virus, and use of immunosuppressants.¹⁵ Male predominance and advanced age at the time of diagnosis (mean age, 67 years) have been observed in pSCC cases.¹⁶ It is now well established that renal transplant recipients have an increased risk of SCC, with a reported incidence rate of 5% to 6%.¹⁶ When these patients develop an SCC, they typically follow a more aggressive course. Renal transplantation has a higher ratio than cardiac transplantation for SCC development (2.37:1), whereas cardiac transplantation is associated with a higher risk of BCC development.¹⁷ A study of 384 transplant recipients found that 96 (25.0%) had a postsurgical nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), with a ratio of SCC to BCC of 1.2:1.¹⁶ The calculated incidence of NMSC at 10 and 20 years posttransplantation was 24.2% and 54.4%, respectively. Another study also determined that SCC rates (50.0%) in postrenal transplant recipients were approximately twice that of BCC (27.0%).¹⁸

A daily regimen of immunosuppressive medications such as cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil showed an increased risk for development of NMSC.¹⁵ Immunosuppressive medications play an important role in the pathogenesis of SCC due to a direct oncogenic effect as well as impairment of the immune system’s ability to fight precancerous developments.¹⁵ A 4-year study of 100 renal transplant recipients using mycophenolate mofetil as part of an immunosuppressive regimen reported 22% NMSC findings among 9 patients.¹⁹ On average, patients developed an NMSC approximately 61 months posttransplantation, with a wide range from 2 to 120 months.

Advanced age was another important risk factor, with each decade of life producing a 60% increase in instantaneous risk of SCC development for transplant recipients.¹⁵ A steady increase in risk was related to the length of time adhering to an immunosuppressive regimen, especially from 2 to 6 years, and then remaining constant in subsequent years. For older patients on immunosuppressant regimens for more than 8 years, the calculated relative risk was noted to be over 200 times greater than the normal population’s development of skin cancers.¹⁸

Conclusion

Although cases of pSCC presenting as longitudinal melanonychia have previously been reported,^9-14,20 our case is unique in that it describes pSCC in a renal transplant recipient. Our patient had many of the known risk factors for the development of pSCC including male sex, advanced age, skin of color, history of renal transplantation, and immunosuppressive therapy. Although regular full-body skin examinations are an accepted part of renal transplantation follow-up due to SCC risk, our case emphasizes the need to remain vigilant due to possible atypical presentations among the immunosuppressed. The nail unit should not be overlooked during the clinical examination of renal transplant recipients as demonstrated by our patient’s rare presentation of pSCC in the nail.

Cutaneous manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) can be classified as lupus-specific or lupus-nonspecific skin lesions. Lupus-specific lesions commonly are photodistributed, with involvement of the malar region, arms, and trunk. The development of discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) in areas of trauma, including sun-exposed skin, is not uncommon and may be associated with an isomorphic response. We present a rare case of an isomorphic response following herpes zoster (HZ) in a young woman undergoing treatment with immunosuppressive agents for SLE and DLE. Potential prophylactic therapy also is discussed.

Case Report

A 19-year-old woman initially presented to an outside dermatologist for evaluation of new-onset scarring alopecia, crusted erythematous plaques on the face and arms, and arthralgia. A punch biopsy of a lesion on the left arm demonstrated a lichenoid and perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate with scattered necrotic keratinocytes, perifollicular inflammation, and focally thickened basement membrane at the dermoepidermal junction consistent with discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE). A laboratory workup for SLE revealed 1:1280 antinuclear antibodies (reference range, negative <1:80) with elevated titers of double-stranded DNA, Smith, ribonucleoprotein, Sjögren syndrome A, and Sjögren syndrome B autoantibodies with low complement levels. Based on these findings, a diagnosis of SLE and DLE was made.

At that time, the patient was started on hydroxychloroquine 200 mg twice daily for SLE. Four days later she developed swelling in both hands and feet, and hydroxychloroquine was stopped due to a presumed adverse reaction; however, her symptoms subsequently were determined to be polyarthritis secondary to a lupus flare. Prednisone 10 mg once daily was then initiated. The patient was encouraged to restart hydroxychloroquine, but she declined.

Over the next 13 months, the patient developed severe photosensitivity, oral ulcers, Raynaud phenomenon, anemia, and nephrotic-range proteinuria. She ultimately was diagnosed by the nephrology department at our institution with mixed diffuse proliferative and membranous glomerulonephritis. Induction therapy with oral mycophenolate mofetil 1000 mg twice daily and prednisone 60 mg once daily was started, followed by the addition of tacrolimus 1 mg twice daily. Despite immunosuppressive therapy, she continued to develop new discoid lesions on the face, chest, and arms. The disease course also was complicated by a pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis, for which the hematology department initiated treatment with warfarin for anticoagulation. Anticardiolipin antibodies were negative at presentation and again 12 weeks later.

After 4 weeks of treatment with mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and tacrolimus, the patient developed a painful vesicular rash on the left breast with extension over the left axilla and scapula in a T3 to T4 dermatomal distribution. A clinical diagnosis of HZ was made, and she was started on intravenous acyclovir 10 mg/kg in dextrose 5% every 8 hours for 4 days followed by oral valacyclovir 1000 mg every 8 hours for 14 days, which led to resolution of the eruption.

Over the next 4 months, the patient continued to experience pain confined to the same dermatomal area as the HZ, which was consistent with postherpetic neuralgia. Mycophenolate mofetil was discontinued after she developed acute liver toxicity attributed to the drug. Upon discontinuation, the patient developed a new pruritic rash on both arms and the back. Physical examination by the dermatology department at our institution revealed diffuse, scaly, hyperpigmented papules and annular plaques with central pink hypopigmentation on the face, ears, anterior chest, arms, hands, and back. On the left anterior chest and back, the distribution was strikingly unilateral and multidermatomal (Figure 1). Upon further questioning, the patient confirmed that the areas of the new rash coincided with areas previously affected by HZ. Histologic examination of a representative lesion from the left lateral breast revealed hyperkeratosis, follicular plugging, a patchy lichenoid and perivascular mononuclear cell infiltrate, and pigment incontinence (Figure 2A). These histologic features were subtle and were not diagnostic for lupus; however, direct immunofluorescence demonstrated a continuous granular band of IgG and C3 along the dermoepidermal junction, confirming the diagnosis of DLE (Figure 2B). The histologic findings and clinical presentation were consistent with the development of DLE in areas of previous trauma from HZ. The patient continues to follow-up with the rheumatology and nephrology departments but was lost to dermatology follow-up.

 

Comment

The pathogenesis of DLE is poorly understood but is thought to be multifactorial, involving genetics, sun exposure, and immune dysregulation.¹ Development of DLE lesions in skin traumatized by tattoos, scratches, scars, and prolonged heat exposure has been reported.² Clarification of the mechanism(s) underlying these traumatized areas may provide insight into the pathophysiology of DLE.

The isomorphic response, also known as the Köbner phenomenon, is the development of a preexisting skin condition at a site of trauma. This phenomenon has been observed in several dermatologic conditions including psoriasis, lichen planus, systemic sclerosis, dermatomyositis, sarcoidosis, vitiligo, and DLE.³ Koebnerization may result from trauma to the skin caused by scratches, sun exposure, radiography, prolonged heat and cold exposure, pressure, tattoos, scars, and inflammatory dermatoses.^2,4 Ueki⁴ suggested that localized trauma to the skin stimulates an immune response that makes the traumatized site a target for a preexisting skin condition. Inflammatory mediators such as IL-1, tumor necrosis factor α, IL-6, and interferon γ have been implicated in the pathophysiology of the isomorphic response.⁴

Wolf isotopic response is a similar entity that refers to the development of a novel skin condition at the site of a distinct, previously resolved skin disorder. This phenomenon was described by Wolf et al⁵ in 1995, and since then over 170 cases have been reported.^5-7 In most cases the initial skin condition is HZ, although herpes simplex virus has also been implicated. The common resulting skin conditions include granulomatous reactions, malignant tumors, lichen planus, morphea, and infections. The notion that the antecedent skin disease alters the affected site and causes it to be more susceptible to autoimmunity has been proposed as a mechanism for the isotopic response.^7,8 While one might consider our presentation of DLE following HZ to be an isotopic response, we believe this case is best classified as an isomorphic response, as the patient already had an established diagnosis of DLE.

The development of DLE at the site of a previous HZ eruption has been described in 2 other cases of young women with SLE.^9,10 Unique to our case is the development of a multidermatomal eruption, which may be an indication of her degree of immunosuppression, as immunosuppressed patients are more likely to present with multidermatomal reactivation of varicella zoster virus and postherpetic neuralgia.¹¹ The similarities between our case and the 2 prior reports—including the patients’ age, sex, history of SLE, and degree of immunosuppression—are noteworthy in that they may represent a subset of SLE patients who are predisposed to developing koebnerization following HZ. Physicians should be aware of this phenomenon and consider being proactive in preventing long-term damage.

When feasible, physicians should consider administering the HZ vaccine to reduce the course and severity of HZ before prescribing immunosuppressive agents. When HZ presents in young, immunosuppressed women with a history of SLE, we suggest monitoring the affected sites closely for any evidence of DLE. Topical corticosteroids should be applied to involved areas of the face or body at the earliest appearance of such lesions, which may prevent the isomorphic response and its potentially scarring DLE lesions. This will be our therapeutic approach if we encounter a similar clinical situation in the future. Further studies are warranted to assess the efficacy and optimal duration of this approach, which to our knowledge has not been reported in the literature. It may be that aggressive treatment for a few weeks can preclude the further development of DLE lesions; however, DLE lesions may appear in susceptible skin months after the HZ has resolved.

Acknowledgment
We thank Carolyn E. Grotkowski, MD, from the Department of Pathology, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, for her assistance in photographing the pathology slides.

Cutaneous manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) can be classified as lupus-specific or lupus-nonspecific skin lesions. Lupus-specific lesions commonly are photodistributed, with involvement of the malar region, arms, and trunk. The development of discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) in areas of trauma, including sun-exposed skin, is not uncommon and may be associated with an isomorphic response. We present a rare case of an isomorphic response following herpes zoster (HZ) in a young woman undergoing treatment with immunosuppressive agents for SLE and DLE. Potential prophylactic therapy also is discussed.

Case Report

A 19-year-old woman initially presented to an outside dermatologist for evaluation of new-onset scarring alopecia, crusted erythematous plaques on the face and arms, and arthralgia. A punch biopsy of a lesion on the left arm demonstrated a lichenoid and perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate with scattered necrotic keratinocytes, perifollicular inflammation, and focally thickened basement membrane at the dermoepidermal junction consistent with discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE). A laboratory workup for SLE revealed 1:1280 antinuclear antibodies (reference range, negative <1:80) with elevated titers of double-stranded DNA, Smith, ribonucleoprotein, Sjögren syndrome A, and Sjögren syndrome B autoantibodies with low complement levels. Based on these findings, a diagnosis of SLE and DLE was made.

At that time, the patient was started on hydroxychloroquine 200 mg twice daily for SLE. Four days later she developed swelling in both hands and feet, and hydroxychloroquine was stopped due to a presumed adverse reaction; however, her symptoms subsequently were determined to be polyarthritis secondary to a lupus flare. Prednisone 10 mg once daily was then initiated. The patient was encouraged to restart hydroxychloroquine, but she declined.

Over the next 13 months, the patient developed severe photosensitivity, oral ulcers, Raynaud phenomenon, anemia, and nephrotic-range proteinuria. She ultimately was diagnosed by the nephrology department at our institution with mixed diffuse proliferative and membranous glomerulonephritis. Induction therapy with oral mycophenolate mofetil 1000 mg twice daily and prednisone 60 mg once daily was started, followed by the addition of tacrolimus 1 mg twice daily. Despite immunosuppressive therapy, she continued to develop new discoid lesions on the face, chest, and arms. The disease course also was complicated by a pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis, for which the hematology department initiated treatment with warfarin for anticoagulation. Anticardiolipin antibodies were negative at presentation and again 12 weeks later.

After 4 weeks of treatment with mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and tacrolimus, the patient developed a painful vesicular rash on the left breast with extension over the left axilla and scapula in a T3 to T4 dermatomal distribution. A clinical diagnosis of HZ was made, and she was started on intravenous acyclovir 10 mg/kg in dextrose 5% every 8 hours for 4 days followed by oral valacyclovir 1000 mg every 8 hours for 14 days, which led to resolution of the eruption.

Over the next 4 months, the patient continued to experience pain confined to the same dermatomal area as the HZ, which was consistent with postherpetic neuralgia. Mycophenolate mofetil was discontinued after she developed acute liver toxicity attributed to the drug. Upon discontinuation, the patient developed a new pruritic rash on both arms and the back. Physical examination by the dermatology department at our institution revealed diffuse, scaly, hyperpigmented papules and annular plaques with central pink hypopigmentation on the face, ears, anterior chest, arms, hands, and back. On the left anterior chest and back, the distribution was strikingly unilateral and multidermatomal (Figure 1). Upon further questioning, the patient confirmed that the areas of the new rash coincided with areas previously affected by HZ. Histologic examination of a representative lesion from the left lateral breast revealed hyperkeratosis, follicular plugging, a patchy lichenoid and perivascular mononuclear cell infiltrate, and pigment incontinence (Figure 2A). These histologic features were subtle and were not diagnostic for lupus; however, direct immunofluorescence demonstrated a continuous granular band of IgG and C3 along the dermoepidermal junction, confirming the diagnosis of DLE (Figure 2B). The histologic findings and clinical presentation were consistent with the development of DLE in areas of previous trauma from HZ. The patient continues to follow-up with the rheumatology and nephrology departments but was lost to dermatology follow-up.

 

Comment

The pathogenesis of DLE is poorly understood but is thought to be multifactorial, involving genetics, sun exposure, and immune dysregulation.¹ Development of DLE lesions in skin traumatized by tattoos, scratches, scars, and prolonged heat exposure has been reported.² Clarification of the mechanism(s) underlying these traumatized areas may provide insight into the pathophysiology of DLE.

The isomorphic response, also known as the Köbner phenomenon, is the development of a preexisting skin condition at a site of trauma. This phenomenon has been observed in several dermatologic conditions including psoriasis, lichen planus, systemic sclerosis, dermatomyositis, sarcoidosis, vitiligo, and DLE.³ Koebnerization may result from trauma to the skin caused by scratches, sun exposure, radiography, prolonged heat and cold exposure, pressure, tattoos, scars, and inflammatory dermatoses.^2,4 Ueki⁴ suggested that localized trauma to the skin stimulates an immune response that makes the traumatized site a target for a preexisting skin condition. Inflammatory mediators such as IL-1, tumor necrosis factor α, IL-6, and interferon γ have been implicated in the pathophysiology of the isomorphic response.⁴

Wolf isotopic response is a similar entity that refers to the development of a novel skin condition at the site of a distinct, previously resolved skin disorder. This phenomenon was described by Wolf et al⁵ in 1995, and since then over 170 cases have been reported.^5-7 In most cases the initial skin condition is HZ, although herpes simplex virus has also been implicated. The common resulting skin conditions include granulomatous reactions, malignant tumors, lichen planus, morphea, and infections. The notion that the antecedent skin disease alters the affected site and causes it to be more susceptible to autoimmunity has been proposed as a mechanism for the isotopic response.^7,8 While one might consider our presentation of DLE following HZ to be an isotopic response, we believe this case is best classified as an isomorphic response, as the patient already had an established diagnosis of DLE.

The development of DLE at the site of a previous HZ eruption has been described in 2 other cases of young women with SLE.^9,10 Unique to our case is the development of a multidermatomal eruption, which may be an indication of her degree of immunosuppression, as immunosuppressed patients are more likely to present with multidermatomal reactivation of varicella zoster virus and postherpetic neuralgia.¹¹ The similarities between our case and the 2 prior reports—including the patients’ age, sex, history of SLE, and degree of immunosuppression—are noteworthy in that they may represent a subset of SLE patients who are predisposed to developing koebnerization following HZ. Physicians should be aware of this phenomenon and consider being proactive in preventing long-term damage.

When feasible, physicians should consider administering the HZ vaccine to reduce the course and severity of HZ before prescribing immunosuppressive agents. When HZ presents in young, immunosuppressed women with a history of SLE, we suggest monitoring the affected sites closely for any evidence of DLE. Topical corticosteroids should be applied to involved areas of the face or body at the earliest appearance of such lesions, which may prevent the isomorphic response and its potentially scarring DLE lesions. This will be our therapeutic approach if we encounter a similar clinical situation in the future. Further studies are warranted to assess the efficacy and optimal duration of this approach, which to our knowledge has not been reported in the literature. It may be that aggressive treatment for a few weeks can preclude the further development of DLE lesions; however, DLE lesions may appear in susceptible skin months after the HZ has resolved.

Acknowledgment
We thank Carolyn E. Grotkowski, MD, from the Department of Pathology, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, for her assistance in photographing the pathology slides.

Cutaneous manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) can be classified as lupus-specific or lupus-nonspecific skin lesions. Lupus-specific lesions commonly are photodistributed, with involvement of the malar region, arms, and trunk. The development of discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) in areas of trauma, including sun-exposed skin, is not uncommon and may be associated with an isomorphic response. We present a rare case of an isomorphic response following herpes zoster (HZ) in a young woman undergoing treatment with immunosuppressive agents for SLE and DLE. Potential prophylactic therapy also is discussed.

Case Report

A 19-year-old woman initially presented to an outside dermatologist for evaluation of new-onset scarring alopecia, crusted erythematous plaques on the face and arms, and arthralgia. A punch biopsy of a lesion on the left arm demonstrated a lichenoid and perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate with scattered necrotic keratinocytes, perifollicular inflammation, and focally thickened basement membrane at the dermoepidermal junction consistent with discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE). A laboratory workup for SLE revealed 1:1280 antinuclear antibodies (reference range, negative <1:80) with elevated titers of double-stranded DNA, Smith, ribonucleoprotein, Sjögren syndrome A, and Sjögren syndrome B autoantibodies with low complement levels. Based on these findings, a diagnosis of SLE and DLE was made.

At that time, the patient was started on hydroxychloroquine 200 mg twice daily for SLE. Four days later she developed swelling in both hands and feet, and hydroxychloroquine was stopped due to a presumed adverse reaction; however, her symptoms subsequently were determined to be polyarthritis secondary to a lupus flare. Prednisone 10 mg once daily was then initiated. The patient was encouraged to restart hydroxychloroquine, but she declined.

Over the next 13 months, the patient developed severe photosensitivity, oral ulcers, Raynaud phenomenon, anemia, and nephrotic-range proteinuria. She ultimately was diagnosed by the nephrology department at our institution with mixed diffuse proliferative and membranous glomerulonephritis. Induction therapy with oral mycophenolate mofetil 1000 mg twice daily and prednisone 60 mg once daily was started, followed by the addition of tacrolimus 1 mg twice daily. Despite immunosuppressive therapy, she continued to develop new discoid lesions on the face, chest, and arms. The disease course also was complicated by a pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis, for which the hematology department initiated treatment with warfarin for anticoagulation. Anticardiolipin antibodies were negative at presentation and again 12 weeks later.

After 4 weeks of treatment with mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and tacrolimus, the patient developed a painful vesicular rash on the left breast with extension over the left axilla and scapula in a T3 to T4 dermatomal distribution. A clinical diagnosis of HZ was made, and she was started on intravenous acyclovir 10 mg/kg in dextrose 5% every 8 hours for 4 days followed by oral valacyclovir 1000 mg every 8 hours for 14 days, which led to resolution of the eruption.

Over the next 4 months, the patient continued to experience pain confined to the same dermatomal area as the HZ, which was consistent with postherpetic neuralgia. Mycophenolate mofetil was discontinued after she developed acute liver toxicity attributed to the drug. Upon discontinuation, the patient developed a new pruritic rash on both arms and the back. Physical examination by the dermatology department at our institution revealed diffuse, scaly, hyperpigmented papules and annular plaques with central pink hypopigmentation on the face, ears, anterior chest, arms, hands, and back. On the left anterior chest and back, the distribution was strikingly unilateral and multidermatomal (Figure 1). Upon further questioning, the patient confirmed that the areas of the new rash coincided with areas previously affected by HZ. Histologic examination of a representative lesion from the left lateral breast revealed hyperkeratosis, follicular plugging, a patchy lichenoid and perivascular mononuclear cell infiltrate, and pigment incontinence (Figure 2A). These histologic features were subtle and were not diagnostic for lupus; however, direct immunofluorescence demonstrated a continuous granular band of IgG and C3 along the dermoepidermal junction, confirming the diagnosis of DLE (Figure 2B). The histologic findings and clinical presentation were consistent with the development of DLE in areas of previous trauma from HZ. The patient continues to follow-up with the rheumatology and nephrology departments but was lost to dermatology follow-up.

 

Comment

The pathogenesis of DLE is poorly understood but is thought to be multifactorial, involving genetics, sun exposure, and immune dysregulation.¹ Development of DLE lesions in skin traumatized by tattoos, scratches, scars, and prolonged heat exposure has been reported.² Clarification of the mechanism(s) underlying these traumatized areas may provide insight into the pathophysiology of DLE.

The isomorphic response, also known as the Köbner phenomenon, is the development of a preexisting skin condition at a site of trauma. This phenomenon has been observed in several dermatologic conditions including psoriasis, lichen planus, systemic sclerosis, dermatomyositis, sarcoidosis, vitiligo, and DLE.³ Koebnerization may result from trauma to the skin caused by scratches, sun exposure, radiography, prolonged heat and cold exposure, pressure, tattoos, scars, and inflammatory dermatoses.^2,4 Ueki⁴ suggested that localized trauma to the skin stimulates an immune response that makes the traumatized site a target for a preexisting skin condition. Inflammatory mediators such as IL-1, tumor necrosis factor α, IL-6, and interferon γ have been implicated in the pathophysiology of the isomorphic response.⁴

Wolf isotopic response is a similar entity that refers to the development of a novel skin condition at the site of a distinct, previously resolved skin disorder. This phenomenon was described by Wolf et al⁵ in 1995, and since then over 170 cases have been reported.^5-7 In most cases the initial skin condition is HZ, although herpes simplex virus has also been implicated. The common resulting skin conditions include granulomatous reactions, malignant tumors, lichen planus, morphea, and infections. The notion that the antecedent skin disease alters the affected site and causes it to be more susceptible to autoimmunity has been proposed as a mechanism for the isotopic response.^7,8 While one might consider our presentation of DLE following HZ to be an isotopic response, we believe this case is best classified as an isomorphic response, as the patient already had an established diagnosis of DLE.

The development of DLE at the site of a previous HZ eruption has been described in 2 other cases of young women with SLE.^9,10 Unique to our case is the development of a multidermatomal eruption, which may be an indication of her degree of immunosuppression, as immunosuppressed patients are more likely to present with multidermatomal reactivation of varicella zoster virus and postherpetic neuralgia.¹¹ The similarities between our case and the 2 prior reports—including the patients’ age, sex, history of SLE, and degree of immunosuppression—are noteworthy in that they may represent a subset of SLE patients who are predisposed to developing koebnerization following HZ. Physicians should be aware of this phenomenon and consider being proactive in preventing long-term damage.

When feasible, physicians should consider administering the HZ vaccine to reduce the course and severity of HZ before prescribing immunosuppressive agents. When HZ presents in young, immunosuppressed women with a history of SLE, we suggest monitoring the affected sites closely for any evidence of DLE. Topical corticosteroids should be applied to involved areas of the face or body at the earliest appearance of such lesions, which may prevent the isomorphic response and its potentially scarring DLE lesions. This will be our therapeutic approach if we encounter a similar clinical situation in the future. Further studies are warranted to assess the efficacy and optimal duration of this approach, which to our knowledge has not been reported in the literature. It may be that aggressive treatment for a few weeks can preclude the further development of DLE lesions; however, DLE lesions may appear in susceptible skin months after the HZ has resolved.

Acknowledgment
We thank Carolyn E. Grotkowski, MD, from the Department of Pathology, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, for her assistance in photographing the pathology slides.

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin cancer in the United States¹ and most commonly occurs in sun-exposed areas. Although BCCs can and do develop on other non–sun-exposed areas of the body, BCCs of the perianal or genital regions are very rare (0.27% of cases). It is estimated that perianal BCCs account for less than 0.08% of all BCCs.²

We present a case of a superficial nodular perianal BCC that was discovered following an annual total-body skin examination and was treated with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS).

Case Report

A 76-year-old man presented to the dermatology clinic for an annual total-body skin examination as well as evaluation of a new submental skin lesion. The patient’s medical history included successfully treated malignant melanoma in situ, multiple actinic keratoses, and an eccrine carcinoma. His family history was noncontributory. Inspection of the submental lesion revealed a pearly, 1.8-cm, telangiectatic, nodular plaque that was highly suspected to be a BCC. During the examination, a 1-cm pinkish-red plaque was found on the skin in the left perianal region (Figure 1). The patient was unaware of the lesion and did not report any symptoms upon questioning.

A shave biopsy of the submental lesion confirmed a diagnosis of micronodular BCC, and the patient was referred for MMS. It was decided to reevaluate the perianal lesion clinically at a follow-up appointment 2 months later and biopsy if it had not resolved. However, the patient did not attend the 2-month follow-up visit as scheduled, and it was not until the following year at his next annual total-body skin examination that the perianal lesion was rechecked. The lesion was unchanged at the time and was similar to the previous findings in both appearance and size. A punch biopsy was performed, and the pathology showed a superficial nodular perianal BCC (Figure 2). The perianal BCC was excised during a 2-stage MMS procedure with no recurrence at 6-month follow-up (Figure 3).

Comment

At the time of the patient’s initial visit, the differential diagnosis for this perianal lesion included an inflammatory or infectious dermatosis. Its asymptomatic nature made it difficult to determine how long it had been present. The lack of resolution on reevaluation of the lesion 1 year later raised the possibilities of amelanotic melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and lichen planus. Basal cell carcinoma was much lower in the differential diagnosis, as BCCs rarely are found in this area of the body; in fact, BCCs account for 0.2% of all anorectal neoplasms,³ and less than 0.08% of BCCs will occur in the perianal region.²

This challenging presentation is common for BCCs found in the perianal and perineal regions, as they are difficult to diagnose and often are overlooked as inflammatory dermatoses.^4,5 The infrequency of perianal BCC reported in the literature as well as the predominance of BCC in sun-exposed areas makes it difficult for dermatologists to diagnose perianal BCC without biopsy. Another feature indicative of this diagnostic difficulty is that the average size of perianal and perineal BCCs has been found to be 1.95 cm.² Without thorough and routine total-body skin examinations, there is no reliable way to catch asymptomatic BCCs in the perianal region until they have progressed far enough to become symptomatic. When possible, we recommend that dermatologists check the genital and anal regions during skin examinations and biopsy any suspicious lesions.

This case also highlights the challenge of missed appointments, which dermatologists also consistently face. Nonattendance rates in US dermatology clinics have been estimated at 17%,⁶ 18.6%,⁷ 19.4%,⁸ and 23.9%⁹ and present a challenge for even the best-run practices. Among patients with missed appointments, the most frequently stated reason in one survey was forgetting, and 24% of those contacted reported that they had not been reminded of their appointment.⁸ Many of the patients surveyed also expressed that they had preferred methods of receiving reminders such as e-mail or text message, which fell outside of traditional contact methods (eg, phone calls, voicemails). Confirming appointments ahead of time can reduce the number of missed appointments due to patient forgetfulness, and incorporating multiple communication modalities may lead to more effective appointment reminders.

Conclusion

Perianal BCC is challenging to diagnose and easy to overlook. Basal cell carcinoma is rarely found in the perianal regions and accounts for a fraction of all anorectal neoplasms. We recommend thorough total-body skin examinations that include the genital region and gluteal cleft when possible and encourage physicians to biopsy suspicious lesions in these regions. Routine, thorough total-body skin examinations can reveal neoplasms when they are smaller and asymptomatic. When surgical excision is indicated, MMS is an effective way to preserve as much tissue as possible and minimize recurrence.

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin cancer in the United States¹ and most commonly occurs in sun-exposed areas. Although BCCs can and do develop on other non–sun-exposed areas of the body, BCCs of the perianal or genital regions are very rare (0.27% of cases). It is estimated that perianal BCCs account for less than 0.08% of all BCCs.²

We present a case of a superficial nodular perianal BCC that was discovered following an annual total-body skin examination and was treated with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS).

Case Report

A 76-year-old man presented to the dermatology clinic for an annual total-body skin examination as well as evaluation of a new submental skin lesion. The patient’s medical history included successfully treated malignant melanoma in situ, multiple actinic keratoses, and an eccrine carcinoma. His family history was noncontributory. Inspection of the submental lesion revealed a pearly, 1.8-cm, telangiectatic, nodular plaque that was highly suspected to be a BCC. During the examination, a 1-cm pinkish-red plaque was found on the skin in the left perianal region (Figure 1). The patient was unaware of the lesion and did not report any symptoms upon questioning.

A shave biopsy of the submental lesion confirmed a diagnosis of micronodular BCC, and the patient was referred for MMS. It was decided to reevaluate the perianal lesion clinically at a follow-up appointment 2 months later and biopsy if it had not resolved. However, the patient did not attend the 2-month follow-up visit as scheduled, and it was not until the following year at his next annual total-body skin examination that the perianal lesion was rechecked. The lesion was unchanged at the time and was similar to the previous findings in both appearance and size. A punch biopsy was performed, and the pathology showed a superficial nodular perianal BCC (Figure 2). The perianal BCC was excised during a 2-stage MMS procedure with no recurrence at 6-month follow-up (Figure 3).

Comment

At the time of the patient’s initial visit, the differential diagnosis for this perianal lesion included an inflammatory or infectious dermatosis. Its asymptomatic nature made it difficult to determine how long it had been present. The lack of resolution on reevaluation of the lesion 1 year later raised the possibilities of amelanotic melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and lichen planus. Basal cell carcinoma was much lower in the differential diagnosis, as BCCs rarely are found in this area of the body; in fact, BCCs account for 0.2% of all anorectal neoplasms,³ and less than 0.08% of BCCs will occur in the perianal region.²

This challenging presentation is common for BCCs found in the perianal and perineal regions, as they are difficult to diagnose and often are overlooked as inflammatory dermatoses.^4,5 The infrequency of perianal BCC reported in the literature as well as the predominance of BCC in sun-exposed areas makes it difficult for dermatologists to diagnose perianal BCC without biopsy. Another feature indicative of this diagnostic difficulty is that the average size of perianal and perineal BCCs has been found to be 1.95 cm.² Without thorough and routine total-body skin examinations, there is no reliable way to catch asymptomatic BCCs in the perianal region until they have progressed far enough to become symptomatic. When possible, we recommend that dermatologists check the genital and anal regions during skin examinations and biopsy any suspicious lesions.

This case also highlights the challenge of missed appointments, which dermatologists also consistently face. Nonattendance rates in US dermatology clinics have been estimated at 17%,⁶ 18.6%,⁷ 19.4%,⁸ and 23.9%⁹ and present a challenge for even the best-run practices. Among patients with missed appointments, the most frequently stated reason in one survey was forgetting, and 24% of those contacted reported that they had not been reminded of their appointment.⁸ Many of the patients surveyed also expressed that they had preferred methods of receiving reminders such as e-mail or text message, which fell outside of traditional contact methods (eg, phone calls, voicemails). Confirming appointments ahead of time can reduce the number of missed appointments due to patient forgetfulness, and incorporating multiple communication modalities may lead to more effective appointment reminders.

Conclusion

Perianal BCC is challenging to diagnose and easy to overlook. Basal cell carcinoma is rarely found in the perianal regions and accounts for a fraction of all anorectal neoplasms. We recommend thorough total-body skin examinations that include the genital region and gluteal cleft when possible and encourage physicians to biopsy suspicious lesions in these regions. Routine, thorough total-body skin examinations can reveal neoplasms when they are smaller and asymptomatic. When surgical excision is indicated, MMS is an effective way to preserve as much tissue as possible and minimize recurrence.

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin cancer in the United States¹ and most commonly occurs in sun-exposed areas. Although BCCs can and do develop on other non–sun-exposed areas of the body, BCCs of the perianal or genital regions are very rare (0.27% of cases). It is estimated that perianal BCCs account for less than 0.08% of all BCCs.²

We present a case of a superficial nodular perianal BCC that was discovered following an annual total-body skin examination and was treated with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS).

Case Report

A 76-year-old man presented to the dermatology clinic for an annual total-body skin examination as well as evaluation of a new submental skin lesion. The patient’s medical history included successfully treated malignant melanoma in situ, multiple actinic keratoses, and an eccrine carcinoma. His family history was noncontributory. Inspection of the submental lesion revealed a pearly, 1.8-cm, telangiectatic, nodular plaque that was highly suspected to be a BCC. During the examination, a 1-cm pinkish-red plaque was found on the skin in the left perianal region (Figure 1). The patient was unaware of the lesion and did not report any symptoms upon questioning.

A shave biopsy of the submental lesion confirmed a diagnosis of micronodular BCC, and the patient was referred for MMS. It was decided to reevaluate the perianal lesion clinically at a follow-up appointment 2 months later and biopsy if it had not resolved. However, the patient did not attend the 2-month follow-up visit as scheduled, and it was not until the following year at his next annual total-body skin examination that the perianal lesion was rechecked. The lesion was unchanged at the time and was similar to the previous findings in both appearance and size. A punch biopsy was performed, and the pathology showed a superficial nodular perianal BCC (Figure 2). The perianal BCC was excised during a 2-stage MMS procedure with no recurrence at 6-month follow-up (Figure 3).

Comment

At the time of the patient’s initial visit, the differential diagnosis for this perianal lesion included an inflammatory or infectious dermatosis. Its asymptomatic nature made it difficult to determine how long it had been present. The lack of resolution on reevaluation of the lesion 1 year later raised the possibilities of amelanotic melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and lichen planus. Basal cell carcinoma was much lower in the differential diagnosis, as BCCs rarely are found in this area of the body; in fact, BCCs account for 0.2% of all anorectal neoplasms,³ and less than 0.08% of BCCs will occur in the perianal region.²

This challenging presentation is common for BCCs found in the perianal and perineal regions, as they are difficult to diagnose and often are overlooked as inflammatory dermatoses.^4,5 The infrequency of perianal BCC reported in the literature as well as the predominance of BCC in sun-exposed areas makes it difficult for dermatologists to diagnose perianal BCC without biopsy. Another feature indicative of this diagnostic difficulty is that the average size of perianal and perineal BCCs has been found to be 1.95 cm.² Without thorough and routine total-body skin examinations, there is no reliable way to catch asymptomatic BCCs in the perianal region until they have progressed far enough to become symptomatic. When possible, we recommend that dermatologists check the genital and anal regions during skin examinations and biopsy any suspicious lesions.

This case also highlights the challenge of missed appointments, which dermatologists also consistently face. Nonattendance rates in US dermatology clinics have been estimated at 17%,⁶ 18.6%,⁷ 19.4%,⁸ and 23.9%⁹ and present a challenge for even the best-run practices. Among patients with missed appointments, the most frequently stated reason in one survey was forgetting, and 24% of those contacted reported that they had not been reminded of their appointment.⁸ Many of the patients surveyed also expressed that they had preferred methods of receiving reminders such as e-mail or text message, which fell outside of traditional contact methods (eg, phone calls, voicemails). Confirming appointments ahead of time can reduce the number of missed appointments due to patient forgetfulness, and incorporating multiple communication modalities may lead to more effective appointment reminders.

Conclusion

Perianal BCC is challenging to diagnose and easy to overlook. Basal cell carcinoma is rarely found in the perianal regions and accounts for a fraction of all anorectal neoplasms. We recommend thorough total-body skin examinations that include the genital region and gluteal cleft when possible and encourage physicians to biopsy suspicious lesions in these regions. Routine, thorough total-body skin examinations can reveal neoplasms when they are smaller and asymptomatic. When surgical excision is indicated, MMS is an effective way to preserve as much tissue as possible and minimize recurrence.

In cutaneous field cancerization, focal treatments such as cryotherapy are impractical, thus necessitating the use of field-directed therapies over the lesion and the surrounding skin field. Although evidence-based guidelines do not exist, field-directed therapy has been proposed in cases of 3 or more actinic keratoses (AKs) in a 25-cm² area or larger.¹ It can be further speculated that patients who are vulnerable to aggressive phenotypes of cutaneous malignancies, such as those with a genodermatosis or who are immunocompromised, necessitate a higher index of suspicion for field effect with even 1 or 2 AKs.

Current field-directed therapies include topical agents (imiquimod, fluorouracil, ingenol mebutate, and diclo-fenac), photodynamic therapy (PDT), and resurfacing procedures (lasers, chemical peels, dermabrasion). Although topical agents and PDT currently are gold standards in field treatment, the use of energy-based devices (ie, ablative and nonablative lasers) are attractive options as monotherapy or as part of a combination therapy. These devices are attractive options for field-directed therapy because they offer defined, customizable control of settings, allowing for optimal cosmesis and precision of therapy.

Principally, lasers function by damaging skin tissue to induce resurfacing, neocollagenesis, and vascular restructuring. Fractional versions of ablative and nonablative systems are available to target a fraction of the treatment area in evenly spaced microthermal zones and to minimize overall thermal damage.²

Given recent advances in laser systems and numerous investigations reported in the literature, a review of ablative and nonablative lasers that have been studied as treatment options for cutaneous field cancerization is provided, with a focus on treatment efficacy.

Ablative Lasers

Ablative lasers operate at higher wavelengths than nonablative lasers to destroy epidermal and dermal tissue. The 10,600-nm carbon dioxide (CO₂) and 2940-nm Er:YAG lasers have been heavily investigated for field therapy for multiple AKs, both as monotherapies (Table 1) and in combination with PDT (Table 2).

Monotherapy
One randomized trial with 5-year follow-up compared the efficacy of full-face pulsed CO₂ laser therapy, full-face trichloroacetic acid (TCA) peel 30%, and fluorouracil cream 5% (twice daily for 3 weeks) on AKs on the face and head.³ Thirty-one participants were randomized to the 3 treatment arms and a negative control arm. The mean AK counts at baseline for the CO₂, TCA, and fluorouracil treatment groups were 78.0, 83.7, and 61.8, respectively. At 3-month follow-up, all treatment groups had significant reductions in the mean AK count from baseline (CO₂ group, 92% [P=.03]; TCA group, 89% [P=.004]; fluorouracil group, 83% [P=.008]). No significant differences in efficacy among the treatment groups were noted. All 3 treatment groups had a demonstrably lower incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer over 5-year follow-up compared to the control group (P<.001).³

In contrast to these promising results, the pulsed CO₂ laser showed only short-term efficacy in a split-face study of 12 participants with at least 5 facial or scalp AKs on each of 2 symmetric facial sides who were randomized to 1 treatment side.⁴ At 1-month follow-up, the treatment side exhibited significantly fewer AKs compared to the control side (47% vs 71% at baseline; P=.01), but the improvement was not sustained at 3-month follow-up (49% vs 57%; P=.47).⁴

In another study, the CO₂ laser was found to be inferior to 5-aminolevulinic acid PDT.⁵ Twenty-one participants who had at least 4 AKs in each symmetric half of a body region (head, hands, forearms) were randomized to PDT on 1 side and CO₂ laser therapy on the other. Median baseline AK counts for the PDT and CO₂ laser groups were 6 and 8, respectively. Both treatment groups exhibited significant median AK reduction from baseline 4 weeks posttreatment (PDT group, 82.1% [P<.05], CO₂ laser group, 100% [P<.05]); however. at 3 months posttreatment the PDT group had significantly higher absolute (P=.0155) and relative (P=.0362) reductions in AK count compared to the CO₂ laser group. One participant received a topical antibiotic for superficial infection on the PDT treatment side.⁵

Many questions remain regarding the practical application of laser ablation monotherapy for multiple AKs. More studies are needed to determine the practicality and long-term clinical efficacy of these devices.

PDT Combination Therapy
Laser ablation may be combined with PDT to increase efficacy and prolong remission rates. In fact, laser ablation may be thought of as a physical drug-delivery system to boost uptake of topical agents—in this case, aminolevulinic acid and methyl aminolevulinate (MAL)—given that it disrupts the skin barrier.

In a comparative study of ablative fractional laser (AFXL)–assisted PDT and AFXL alone in 10 organ transplant recipients on immunosuppression with at least 5 AKs on each dorsal hand, participants were randomized to AFXL-PDT on one treatment side and PDT on the other side.⁶ Participants received AFXL in an initial lesion-directed pass and then a second field-directed pass of a fractional CO₂ laser. After AFXL exposure, methyl aminolevulinate was applied to the AFXL-PDT treatment side, with 3-hour occlusion. A total of 680 AKs were treated (335 in the AFXL-PDT group, 345 in the PDT group); results were stratified by the clinical grade of the lesion (1, slightly palpable; 2, moderately thick; 3, very thick or obvious). At 4-month follow-up, the AFXL-PDT group had a significantly higher median complete response rate of 73% compared to 31% in the AFXL group (P=.002). Interestingly, AFXL-PDT was also significantly more efficacious compared to AFXL for grades 1 (80% vs 37%; P=.02) and 2 (53% vs 7%, P=.009) AKs but not grade 3 AKs (4% vs 0%, P=.17).⁶

The combination of fractional CO₂ laser and PDT also demonstrated superiority to PDT.⁷ In a split-face investigation, 15 participants with bilateral symmetric areas of 2 to 10 AKs on the face or scalp were randomized to receive fractional CO₂ laser and MAL-PDT combination therapy on 1 treatment side and conventional MAL-PDT on the other side.⁷ The AFXL-PDT treatment side received laser ablation with immediate subsequent application of MAL to both treatment sides under 3-hour occlusion. At baseline, 103 AKs were treated by AFXL-PDT and 109 AKs were treated with conventional PDT. At 3-month follow-up, the AFXL-PDT treatment group exhibited a significantly higher rate of complete response (90%) compared to the conventional PDT group (67%)(P=.0002).⁷

Like the CO₂ laser, the Er:YAG laser has demonstrated superior results when used in combination with PDT to treat field cancerization compared to either treatment alone. In a comparison study, 93 patients with 2 to 10 AK lesions on the face or scalp were randomized to treatment with AFXL (Er:YAG laser) and MAL-PDT with 3-hour occlusion, AFXL (Er:YAG laser) and MAL-PDT with 2-hour occlusion, and MAL-PDT with 3-hour occlusion.⁸ A total of 440 baseline AK lesions on the face or scalp were treated. At 3-month follow-up, the AFXL-PDT (3-hour occlusion) group had the highest rate of complete response (91.7%), compared to 76.8% (P=.001) in the AFXL-PDT (2-hour occlusion) and 65.6% (P=.001) in the PDT groups, regardless of the grade of AK lesion. The AFXL-PDT (2-hour occlusion) treatment was also superior to PDT alone (P=.038). These findings were sustained at 12-month follow-up (84.8% in the AFXL-PDT [3-hour occlusion] group [P<.001, compared to others]; 67.5% in the AFXL-PDT [2-hour occlusion] group [P<.001, compared to 3-hour PDT]; 51.1% in the PDT group). Importantly, the AK lesion recurrence rate was also lowest in the AFL-PDT (3-hour occlusion) group (7.5% vs 12.1% and 22.1% in the AFXL-PDT [2-hour occlusion] and PDT groups, respectively; P=.007).⁸

Combination therapy with AFXL and daylight PDT (dPDT) may improve the tolerability of PDT and the efficacy rate of field therapy in organ transplant recipients. One study demonstrated the superiority of this combination therapy in a population of 16 organ transplant recipients on immunosuppressants with at least 2 moderate to severely thick AKs in each of 4 comparable areas in the same anatomic region.⁹ The 4 areas were randomized to a single session of AFXL-dPDT, dPDT alone, conventional PDT, or AFXL alone. Ablation was performed with a fractional Er:YAG laser. The AFXL-dPDT and dPDT alone groups received MAL for 2.5 hours without occlusion, and the conventional PDT group received MAL for 3 hours with occlusion. Daylight exposure in dPDT groups was initiated 30 minutes after MAL application for 2 hours total. A baseline total of 542 AKs were treated. At 3-month follow-up, the complete response rate was highest for the AFXL-dPDT group (74%) compared to dPDT alone (46%; P=.0262), conventional PDT (50%; P=.042), and AFXL alone (5%; P=.004). Pain scores for AFXL–dPDT and dPDT alone were significantly lower than for conventional PDT and AFXL alone (P<.001).⁹

 

Nonablative Lasers

By heating the dermis to induce neogenesis without destruction, nonablative lasers offer superior healing times compared to their ablative counterparts. Multiple treatments with nonablative lasers may be necessary for maximal effect. Four nonablative laser devices have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of multiple AKs^10-14: (1) the Q-switched 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser, with or without a 532-nm potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser; (2) the 1540-nm fractional erbium glass laser; (3) the 1550-nm fractional erbium-doped fiber laser; and (4) the 1927-nm fractional thulium laser (Table 3).

In a proof-of-concept study of the Q-switched Nd:YAG laser with the 532-nm KTP laser, 1 treatment session induced full remission of AKs in 10 patients at follow-up day 20, although the investigator did not grade improvement on a numerical scale.¹⁰ In a study of the fractional Q-switched 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser alone, 6 patients with trace or mild AKs received 4 treatment sessions at approximately 2-week intervals.¹⁴ All but 1 patient (who had trace AKs) had no AKs at 3-month follow-up.

The efficacy of the 1540-nm fractional erbium glass laser was examined in 17 participants with investigator-rated moderate-to-severe AK involvement of the scalp and face.¹² Participants were given 2 or 3 treatment sessions at 3- to 4-week intervals and were graded by blinded dermatologists on a quartile scale of 0 (no improvement), 1 (1%–25% improvement), 2 (26%–50% improvement), 3 (51%–75% improvement), or 4 (76%–100% improvement). At 3 months posttreatment, the average grade of improvement was 3.4.¹²

The 1550-nm fractional erbium-doped fiber laser was tested in 14 men with multiple facial AKs (range, 9–44 AKs [mean, 22.1 AKs]).¹¹ Participants received 5 treatment sessions at 2- to 4-week intervals, with majority energies used at 70 MJ and treatment level 11. The mean AK count was reduced significantly by 73.1%, 66.2%, and 55.6% at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up, respectively (P<.001).¹¹

The 1927-nm fractional thulium laser showed promising results in 24 participants with facial AKs.¹³ Participants received up to 4 treatment sessions at intervals from 2 to 6 weeks at the investigators’ discretion. At baseline, patients had an average of 14.04 facial AKs. At 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up, participants exhibited 91.3%, 87.3%, and 86.6% reduction in AK counts, respectively. The mean AK count at 3-month follow-up was 1.88.¹³

Due to limited sample sizes and/or lack of quantifiable results and controls in these studies, more studies are needed to fully elucidate the role of nonablative lasers in the treatment of AK.

Future Directions

Iontophoresis involves the noninvasive induction of an electrical current to facilitate ion movement through the skin and may be a novel method to boost the efficacy of current field therapies. In the first known study of its kisnd, iontophoresis-assisted AFXL-PDT was found to be noninferior to conventional AFXL-PDT¹⁵; however, additional studies demonstrating its superiority are needed before more widespread clinical use is considered.

Pretreatment with AFXL prior to topical field-directed therapies also has been proposed.¹⁶ In a case series of 13 patients, combination therapy with AFXL and ingenol mebutate was shown to be superior to ingenol mebutate alone (AK clearance rate, 89.2% vs 72.1%, respectively; P<.001).¹⁶ Randomized studies with longer follow-up time are needed.

Conclusion

Ablative and nonablative laser systems have yielded limited data about their potential as monotherapies for treatment of multiple AKs and are unlikely to replace topical agents and PDT as a first-line modality in field-directed treatment at this time. More studies with a larger number of participants and long-term follow-up are needed for further clarification of efficacy, safety, and clinical feasibility. Nevertheless, fractional ablative lasers in combination with PDT have shown robust efficacy and a favorable safety profile for treatment of multiple AKs.^6-9 Further, this combination therapy exhibited a superior clearance rate and lower lesion recurrence in organ transplant recipients—a demographic that classically is difficult to treat.^6-9

With continued rapid evolution of laser systems and more widespread use in dermatology, monotherapy and combination therapy may offer a dynamic new option in field cancerization that can decrease disease burden and treatment frequency.

In cutaneous field cancerization, focal treatments such as cryotherapy are impractical, thus necessitating the use of field-directed therapies over the lesion and the surrounding skin field. Although evidence-based guidelines do not exist, field-directed therapy has been proposed in cases of 3 or more actinic keratoses (AKs) in a 25-cm² area or larger.¹ It can be further speculated that patients who are vulnerable to aggressive phenotypes of cutaneous malignancies, such as those with a genodermatosis or who are immunocompromised, necessitate a higher index of suspicion for field effect with even 1 or 2 AKs.

Current field-directed therapies include topical agents (imiquimod, fluorouracil, ingenol mebutate, and diclo-fenac), photodynamic therapy (PDT), and resurfacing procedures (lasers, chemical peels, dermabrasion). Although topical agents and PDT currently are gold standards in field treatment, the use of energy-based devices (ie, ablative and nonablative lasers) are attractive options as monotherapy or as part of a combination therapy. These devices are attractive options for field-directed therapy because they offer defined, customizable control of settings, allowing for optimal cosmesis and precision of therapy.

Principally, lasers function by damaging skin tissue to induce resurfacing, neocollagenesis, and vascular restructuring. Fractional versions of ablative and nonablative systems are available to target a fraction of the treatment area in evenly spaced microthermal zones and to minimize overall thermal damage.²

Given recent advances in laser systems and numerous investigations reported in the literature, a review of ablative and nonablative lasers that have been studied as treatment options for cutaneous field cancerization is provided, with a focus on treatment efficacy.

Ablative Lasers

Ablative lasers operate at higher wavelengths than nonablative lasers to destroy epidermal and dermal tissue. The 10,600-nm carbon dioxide (CO₂) and 2940-nm Er:YAG lasers have been heavily investigated for field therapy for multiple AKs, both as monotherapies (Table 1) and in combination with PDT (Table 2).

Monotherapy
One randomized trial with 5-year follow-up compared the efficacy of full-face pulsed CO₂ laser therapy, full-face trichloroacetic acid (TCA) peel 30%, and fluorouracil cream 5% (twice daily for 3 weeks) on AKs on the face and head.³ Thirty-one participants were randomized to the 3 treatment arms and a negative control arm. The mean AK counts at baseline for the CO₂, TCA, and fluorouracil treatment groups were 78.0, 83.7, and 61.8, respectively. At 3-month follow-up, all treatment groups had significant reductions in the mean AK count from baseline (CO₂ group, 92% [P=.03]; TCA group, 89% [P=.004]; fluorouracil group, 83% [P=.008]). No significant differences in efficacy among the treatment groups were noted. All 3 treatment groups had a demonstrably lower incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer over 5-year follow-up compared to the control group (P<.001).³

In contrast to these promising results, the pulsed CO₂ laser showed only short-term efficacy in a split-face study of 12 participants with at least 5 facial or scalp AKs on each of 2 symmetric facial sides who were randomized to 1 treatment side.⁴ At 1-month follow-up, the treatment side exhibited significantly fewer AKs compared to the control side (47% vs 71% at baseline; P=.01), but the improvement was not sustained at 3-month follow-up (49% vs 57%; P=.47).⁴

In another study, the CO₂ laser was found to be inferior to 5-aminolevulinic acid PDT.⁵ Twenty-one participants who had at least 4 AKs in each symmetric half of a body region (head, hands, forearms) were randomized to PDT on 1 side and CO₂ laser therapy on the other. Median baseline AK counts for the PDT and CO₂ laser groups were 6 and 8, respectively. Both treatment groups exhibited significant median AK reduction from baseline 4 weeks posttreatment (PDT group, 82.1% [P<.05], CO₂ laser group, 100% [P<.05]); however. at 3 months posttreatment the PDT group had significantly higher absolute (P=.0155) and relative (P=.0362) reductions in AK count compared to the CO₂ laser group. One participant received a topical antibiotic for superficial infection on the PDT treatment side.⁵

Many questions remain regarding the practical application of laser ablation monotherapy for multiple AKs. More studies are needed to determine the practicality and long-term clinical efficacy of these devices.

PDT Combination Therapy
Laser ablation may be combined with PDT to increase efficacy and prolong remission rates. In fact, laser ablation may be thought of as a physical drug-delivery system to boost uptake of topical agents—in this case, aminolevulinic acid and methyl aminolevulinate (MAL)—given that it disrupts the skin barrier.

In a comparative study of ablative fractional laser (AFXL)–assisted PDT and AFXL alone in 10 organ transplant recipients on immunosuppression with at least 5 AKs on each dorsal hand, participants were randomized to AFXL-PDT on one treatment side and PDT on the other side.⁶ Participants received AFXL in an initial lesion-directed pass and then a second field-directed pass of a fractional CO₂ laser. After AFXL exposure, methyl aminolevulinate was applied to the AFXL-PDT treatment side, with 3-hour occlusion. A total of 680 AKs were treated (335 in the AFXL-PDT group, 345 in the PDT group); results were stratified by the clinical grade of the lesion (1, slightly palpable; 2, moderately thick; 3, very thick or obvious). At 4-month follow-up, the AFXL-PDT group had a significantly higher median complete response rate of 73% compared to 31% in the AFXL group (P=.002). Interestingly, AFXL-PDT was also significantly more efficacious compared to AFXL for grades 1 (80% vs 37%; P=.02) and 2 (53% vs 7%, P=.009) AKs but not grade 3 AKs (4% vs 0%, P=.17).⁶

The combination of fractional CO₂ laser and PDT also demonstrated superiority to PDT.⁷ In a split-face investigation, 15 participants with bilateral symmetric areas of 2 to 10 AKs on the face or scalp were randomized to receive fractional CO₂ laser and MAL-PDT combination therapy on 1 treatment side and conventional MAL-PDT on the other side.⁷ The AFXL-PDT treatment side received laser ablation with immediate subsequent application of MAL to both treatment sides under 3-hour occlusion. At baseline, 103 AKs were treated by AFXL-PDT and 109 AKs were treated with conventional PDT. At 3-month follow-up, the AFXL-PDT treatment group exhibited a significantly higher rate of complete response (90%) compared to the conventional PDT group (67%)(P=.0002).⁷

Like the CO₂ laser, the Er:YAG laser has demonstrated superior results when used in combination with PDT to treat field cancerization compared to either treatment alone. In a comparison study, 93 patients with 2 to 10 AK lesions on the face or scalp were randomized to treatment with AFXL (Er:YAG laser) and MAL-PDT with 3-hour occlusion, AFXL (Er:YAG laser) and MAL-PDT with 2-hour occlusion, and MAL-PDT with 3-hour occlusion.⁸ A total of 440 baseline AK lesions on the face or scalp were treated. At 3-month follow-up, the AFXL-PDT (3-hour occlusion) group had the highest rate of complete response (91.7%), compared to 76.8% (P=.001) in the AFXL-PDT (2-hour occlusion) and 65.6% (P=.001) in the PDT groups, regardless of the grade of AK lesion. The AFXL-PDT (2-hour occlusion) treatment was also superior to PDT alone (P=.038). These findings were sustained at 12-month follow-up (84.8% in the AFXL-PDT [3-hour occlusion] group [P<.001, compared to others]; 67.5% in the AFXL-PDT [2-hour occlusion] group [P<.001, compared to 3-hour PDT]; 51.1% in the PDT group). Importantly, the AK lesion recurrence rate was also lowest in the AFL-PDT (3-hour occlusion) group (7.5% vs 12.1% and 22.1% in the AFXL-PDT [2-hour occlusion] and PDT groups, respectively; P=.007).⁸

Combination therapy with AFXL and daylight PDT (dPDT) may improve the tolerability of PDT and the efficacy rate of field therapy in organ transplant recipients. One study demonstrated the superiority of this combination therapy in a population of 16 organ transplant recipients on immunosuppressants with at least 2 moderate to severely thick AKs in each of 4 comparable areas in the same anatomic region.⁹ The 4 areas were randomized to a single session of AFXL-dPDT, dPDT alone, conventional PDT, or AFXL alone. Ablation was performed with a fractional Er:YAG laser. The AFXL-dPDT and dPDT alone groups received MAL for 2.5 hours without occlusion, and the conventional PDT group received MAL for 3 hours with occlusion. Daylight exposure in dPDT groups was initiated 30 minutes after MAL application for 2 hours total. A baseline total of 542 AKs were treated. At 3-month follow-up, the complete response rate was highest for the AFXL-dPDT group (74%) compared to dPDT alone (46%; P=.0262), conventional PDT (50%; P=.042), and AFXL alone (5%; P=.004). Pain scores for AFXL–dPDT and dPDT alone were significantly lower than for conventional PDT and AFXL alone (P<.001).⁹

 

Nonablative Lasers

By heating the dermis to induce neogenesis without destruction, nonablative lasers offer superior healing times compared to their ablative counterparts. Multiple treatments with nonablative lasers may be necessary for maximal effect. Four nonablative laser devices have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of multiple AKs^10-14: (1) the Q-switched 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser, with or without a 532-nm potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser; (2) the 1540-nm fractional erbium glass laser; (3) the 1550-nm fractional erbium-doped fiber laser; and (4) the 1927-nm fractional thulium laser (Table 3).

In a proof-of-concept study of the Q-switched Nd:YAG laser with the 532-nm KTP laser, 1 treatment session induced full remission of AKs in 10 patients at follow-up day 20, although the investigator did not grade improvement on a numerical scale.¹⁰ In a study of the fractional Q-switched 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser alone, 6 patients with trace or mild AKs received 4 treatment sessions at approximately 2-week intervals.¹⁴ All but 1 patient (who had trace AKs) had no AKs at 3-month follow-up.

The efficacy of the 1540-nm fractional erbium glass laser was examined in 17 participants with investigator-rated moderate-to-severe AK involvement of the scalp and face.¹² Participants were given 2 or 3 treatment sessions at 3- to 4-week intervals and were graded by blinded dermatologists on a quartile scale of 0 (no improvement), 1 (1%–25% improvement), 2 (26%–50% improvement), 3 (51%–75% improvement), or 4 (76%–100% improvement). At 3 months posttreatment, the average grade of improvement was 3.4.¹²

The 1550-nm fractional erbium-doped fiber laser was tested in 14 men with multiple facial AKs (range, 9–44 AKs [mean, 22.1 AKs]).¹¹ Participants received 5 treatment sessions at 2- to 4-week intervals, with majority energies used at 70 MJ and treatment level 11. The mean AK count was reduced significantly by 73.1%, 66.2%, and 55.6% at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up, respectively (P<.001).¹¹

The 1927-nm fractional thulium laser showed promising results in 24 participants with facial AKs.¹³ Participants received up to 4 treatment sessions at intervals from 2 to 6 weeks at the investigators’ discretion. At baseline, patients had an average of 14.04 facial AKs. At 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up, participants exhibited 91.3%, 87.3%, and 86.6% reduction in AK counts, respectively. The mean AK count at 3-month follow-up was 1.88.¹³

Due to limited sample sizes and/or lack of quantifiable results and controls in these studies, more studies are needed to fully elucidate the role of nonablative lasers in the treatment of AK.

Future Directions

Iontophoresis involves the noninvasive induction of an electrical current to facilitate ion movement through the skin and may be a novel method to boost the efficacy of current field therapies. In the first known study of its kisnd, iontophoresis-assisted AFXL-PDT was found to be noninferior to conventional AFXL-PDT¹⁵; however, additional studies demonstrating its superiority are needed before more widespread clinical use is considered.

Pretreatment with AFXL prior to topical field-directed therapies also has been proposed.¹⁶ In a case series of 13 patients, combination therapy with AFXL and ingenol mebutate was shown to be superior to ingenol mebutate alone (AK clearance rate, 89.2% vs 72.1%, respectively; P<.001).¹⁶ Randomized studies with longer follow-up time are needed.

Conclusion

Ablative and nonablative laser systems have yielded limited data about their potential as monotherapies for treatment of multiple AKs and are unlikely to replace topical agents and PDT as a first-line modality in field-directed treatment at this time. More studies with a larger number of participants and long-term follow-up are needed for further clarification of efficacy, safety, and clinical feasibility. Nevertheless, fractional ablative lasers in combination with PDT have shown robust efficacy and a favorable safety profile for treatment of multiple AKs.^6-9 Further, this combination therapy exhibited a superior clearance rate and lower lesion recurrence in organ transplant recipients—a demographic that classically is difficult to treat.^6-9

With continued rapid evolution of laser systems and more widespread use in dermatology, monotherapy and combination therapy may offer a dynamic new option in field cancerization that can decrease disease burden and treatment frequency.

In cutaneous field cancerization, focal treatments such as cryotherapy are impractical, thus necessitating the use of field-directed therapies over the lesion and the surrounding skin field. Although evidence-based guidelines do not exist, field-directed therapy has been proposed in cases of 3 or more actinic keratoses (AKs) in a 25-cm² area or larger.¹ It can be further speculated that patients who are vulnerable to aggressive phenotypes of cutaneous malignancies, such as those with a genodermatosis or who are immunocompromised, necessitate a higher index of suspicion for field effect with even 1 or 2 AKs.

Current field-directed therapies include topical agents (imiquimod, fluorouracil, ingenol mebutate, and diclo-fenac), photodynamic therapy (PDT), and resurfacing procedures (lasers, chemical peels, dermabrasion). Although topical agents and PDT currently are gold standards in field treatment, the use of energy-based devices (ie, ablative and nonablative lasers) are attractive options as monotherapy or as part of a combination therapy. These devices are attractive options for field-directed therapy because they offer defined, customizable control of settings, allowing for optimal cosmesis and precision of therapy.

Principally, lasers function by damaging skin tissue to induce resurfacing, neocollagenesis, and vascular restructuring. Fractional versions of ablative and nonablative systems are available to target a fraction of the treatment area in evenly spaced microthermal zones and to minimize overall thermal damage.²

Given recent advances in laser systems and numerous investigations reported in the literature, a review of ablative and nonablative lasers that have been studied as treatment options for cutaneous field cancerization is provided, with a focus on treatment efficacy.

Ablative Lasers

Ablative lasers operate at higher wavelengths than nonablative lasers to destroy epidermal and dermal tissue. The 10,600-nm carbon dioxide (CO₂) and 2940-nm Er:YAG lasers have been heavily investigated for field therapy for multiple AKs, both as monotherapies (Table 1) and in combination with PDT (Table 2).

Monotherapy
One randomized trial with 5-year follow-up compared the efficacy of full-face pulsed CO₂ laser therapy, full-face trichloroacetic acid (TCA) peel 30%, and fluorouracil cream 5% (twice daily for 3 weeks) on AKs on the face and head.³ Thirty-one participants were randomized to the 3 treatment arms and a negative control arm. The mean AK counts at baseline for the CO₂, TCA, and fluorouracil treatment groups were 78.0, 83.7, and 61.8, respectively. At 3-month follow-up, all treatment groups had significant reductions in the mean AK count from baseline (CO₂ group, 92% [P=.03]; TCA group, 89% [P=.004]; fluorouracil group, 83% [P=.008]). No significant differences in efficacy among the treatment groups were noted. All 3 treatment groups had a demonstrably lower incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer over 5-year follow-up compared to the control group (P<.001).³

In contrast to these promising results, the pulsed CO₂ laser showed only short-term efficacy in a split-face study of 12 participants with at least 5 facial or scalp AKs on each of 2 symmetric facial sides who were randomized to 1 treatment side.⁴ At 1-month follow-up, the treatment side exhibited significantly fewer AKs compared to the control side (47% vs 71% at baseline; P=.01), but the improvement was not sustained at 3-month follow-up (49% vs 57%; P=.47).⁴

In another study, the CO₂ laser was found to be inferior to 5-aminolevulinic acid PDT.⁵ Twenty-one participants who had at least 4 AKs in each symmetric half of a body region (head, hands, forearms) were randomized to PDT on 1 side and CO₂ laser therapy on the other. Median baseline AK counts for the PDT and CO₂ laser groups were 6 and 8, respectively. Both treatment groups exhibited significant median AK reduction from baseline 4 weeks posttreatment (PDT group, 82.1% [P<.05], CO₂ laser group, 100% [P<.05]); however. at 3 months posttreatment the PDT group had significantly higher absolute (P=.0155) and relative (P=.0362) reductions in AK count compared to the CO₂ laser group. One participant received a topical antibiotic for superficial infection on the PDT treatment side.⁵

Many questions remain regarding the practical application of laser ablation monotherapy for multiple AKs. More studies are needed to determine the practicality and long-term clinical efficacy of these devices.

PDT Combination Therapy
Laser ablation may be combined with PDT to increase efficacy and prolong remission rates. In fact, laser ablation may be thought of as a physical drug-delivery system to boost uptake of topical agents—in this case, aminolevulinic acid and methyl aminolevulinate (MAL)—given that it disrupts the skin barrier.

In a comparative study of ablative fractional laser (AFXL)–assisted PDT and AFXL alone in 10 organ transplant recipients on immunosuppression with at least 5 AKs on each dorsal hand, participants were randomized to AFXL-PDT on one treatment side and PDT on the other side.⁶ Participants received AFXL in an initial lesion-directed pass and then a second field-directed pass of a fractional CO₂ laser. After AFXL exposure, methyl aminolevulinate was applied to the AFXL-PDT treatment side, with 3-hour occlusion. A total of 680 AKs were treated (335 in the AFXL-PDT group, 345 in the PDT group); results were stratified by the clinical grade of the lesion (1, slightly palpable; 2, moderately thick; 3, very thick or obvious). At 4-month follow-up, the AFXL-PDT group had a significantly higher median complete response rate of 73% compared to 31% in the AFXL group (P=.002). Interestingly, AFXL-PDT was also significantly more efficacious compared to AFXL for grades 1 (80% vs 37%; P=.02) and 2 (53% vs 7%, P=.009) AKs but not grade 3 AKs (4% vs 0%, P=.17).⁶

The combination of fractional CO₂ laser and PDT also demonstrated superiority to PDT.⁷ In a split-face investigation, 15 participants with bilateral symmetric areas of 2 to 10 AKs on the face or scalp were randomized to receive fractional CO₂ laser and MAL-PDT combination therapy on 1 treatment side and conventional MAL-PDT on the other side.⁷ The AFXL-PDT treatment side received laser ablation with immediate subsequent application of MAL to both treatment sides under 3-hour occlusion. At baseline, 103 AKs were treated by AFXL-PDT and 109 AKs were treated with conventional PDT. At 3-month follow-up, the AFXL-PDT treatment group exhibited a significantly higher rate of complete response (90%) compared to the conventional PDT group (67%)(P=.0002).⁷

Like the CO₂ laser, the Er:YAG laser has demonstrated superior results when used in combination with PDT to treat field cancerization compared to either treatment alone. In a comparison study, 93 patients with 2 to 10 AK lesions on the face or scalp were randomized to treatment with AFXL (Er:YAG laser) and MAL-PDT with 3-hour occlusion, AFXL (Er:YAG laser) and MAL-PDT with 2-hour occlusion, and MAL-PDT with 3-hour occlusion.⁸ A total of 440 baseline AK lesions on the face or scalp were treated. At 3-month follow-up, the AFXL-PDT (3-hour occlusion) group had the highest rate of complete response (91.7%), compared to 76.8% (P=.001) in the AFXL-PDT (2-hour occlusion) and 65.6% (P=.001) in the PDT groups, regardless of the grade of AK lesion. The AFXL-PDT (2-hour occlusion) treatment was also superior to PDT alone (P=.038). These findings were sustained at 12-month follow-up (84.8% in the AFXL-PDT [3-hour occlusion] group [P<.001, compared to others]; 67.5% in the AFXL-PDT [2-hour occlusion] group [P<.001, compared to 3-hour PDT]; 51.1% in the PDT group). Importantly, the AK lesion recurrence rate was also lowest in the AFL-PDT (3-hour occlusion) group (7.5% vs 12.1% and 22.1% in the AFXL-PDT [2-hour occlusion] and PDT groups, respectively; P=.007).⁸

Combination therapy with AFXL and daylight PDT (dPDT) may improve the tolerability of PDT and the efficacy rate of field therapy in organ transplant recipients. One study demonstrated the superiority of this combination therapy in a population of 16 organ transplant recipients on immunosuppressants with at least 2 moderate to severely thick AKs in each of 4 comparable areas in the same anatomic region.⁹ The 4 areas were randomized to a single session of AFXL-dPDT, dPDT alone, conventional PDT, or AFXL alone. Ablation was performed with a fractional Er:YAG laser. The AFXL-dPDT and dPDT alone groups received MAL for 2.5 hours without occlusion, and the conventional PDT group received MAL for 3 hours with occlusion. Daylight exposure in dPDT groups was initiated 30 minutes after MAL application for 2 hours total. A baseline total of 542 AKs were treated. At 3-month follow-up, the complete response rate was highest for the AFXL-dPDT group (74%) compared to dPDT alone (46%; P=.0262), conventional PDT (50%; P=.042), and AFXL alone (5%; P=.004). Pain scores for AFXL–dPDT and dPDT alone were significantly lower than for conventional PDT and AFXL alone (P<.001).⁹

 

Nonablative Lasers

By heating the dermis to induce neogenesis without destruction, nonablative lasers offer superior healing times compared to their ablative counterparts. Multiple treatments with nonablative lasers may be necessary for maximal effect. Four nonablative laser devices have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of multiple AKs^10-14: (1) the Q-switched 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser, with or without a 532-nm potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser; (2) the 1540-nm fractional erbium glass laser; (3) the 1550-nm fractional erbium-doped fiber laser; and (4) the 1927-nm fractional thulium laser (Table 3).

In a proof-of-concept study of the Q-switched Nd:YAG laser with the 532-nm KTP laser, 1 treatment session induced full remission of AKs in 10 patients at follow-up day 20, although the investigator did not grade improvement on a numerical scale.¹⁰ In a study of the fractional Q-switched 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser alone, 6 patients with trace or mild AKs received 4 treatment sessions at approximately 2-week intervals.¹⁴ All but 1 patient (who had trace AKs) had no AKs at 3-month follow-up.

The efficacy of the 1540-nm fractional erbium glass laser was examined in 17 participants with investigator-rated moderate-to-severe AK involvement of the scalp and face.¹² Participants were given 2 or 3 treatment sessions at 3- to 4-week intervals and were graded by blinded dermatologists on a quartile scale of 0 (no improvement), 1 (1%–25% improvement), 2 (26%–50% improvement), 3 (51%–75% improvement), or 4 (76%–100% improvement). At 3 months posttreatment, the average grade of improvement was 3.4.¹²

The 1550-nm fractional erbium-doped fiber laser was tested in 14 men with multiple facial AKs (range, 9–44 AKs [mean, 22.1 AKs]).¹¹ Participants received 5 treatment sessions at 2- to 4-week intervals, with majority energies used at 70 MJ and treatment level 11. The mean AK count was reduced significantly by 73.1%, 66.2%, and 55.6% at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up, respectively (P<.001).¹¹

The 1927-nm fractional thulium laser showed promising results in 24 participants with facial AKs.¹³ Participants received up to 4 treatment sessions at intervals from 2 to 6 weeks at the investigators’ discretion. At baseline, patients had an average of 14.04 facial AKs. At 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up, participants exhibited 91.3%, 87.3%, and 86.6% reduction in AK counts, respectively. The mean AK count at 3-month follow-up was 1.88.¹³

Due to limited sample sizes and/or lack of quantifiable results and controls in these studies, more studies are needed to fully elucidate the role of nonablative lasers in the treatment of AK.

Future Directions

Iontophoresis involves the noninvasive induction of an electrical current to facilitate ion movement through the skin and may be a novel method to boost the efficacy of current field therapies. In the first known study of its kisnd, iontophoresis-assisted AFXL-PDT was found to be noninferior to conventional AFXL-PDT¹⁵; however, additional studies demonstrating its superiority are needed before more widespread clinical use is considered.

Pretreatment with AFXL prior to topical field-directed therapies also has been proposed.¹⁶ In a case series of 13 patients, combination therapy with AFXL and ingenol mebutate was shown to be superior to ingenol mebutate alone (AK clearance rate, 89.2% vs 72.1%, respectively; P<.001).¹⁶ Randomized studies with longer follow-up time are needed.

Conclusion

Ablative and nonablative laser systems have yielded limited data about their potential as monotherapies for treatment of multiple AKs and are unlikely to replace topical agents and PDT as a first-line modality in field-directed treatment at this time. More studies with a larger number of participants and long-term follow-up are needed for further clarification of efficacy, safety, and clinical feasibility. Nevertheless, fractional ablative lasers in combination with PDT have shown robust efficacy and a favorable safety profile for treatment of multiple AKs.^6-9 Further, this combination therapy exhibited a superior clearance rate and lower lesion recurrence in organ transplant recipients—a demographic that classically is difficult to treat.^6-9

With continued rapid evolution of laser systems and more widespread use in dermatology, monotherapy and combination therapy may offer a dynamic new option in field cancerization that can decrease disease burden and treatment frequency.