Psoriatic Arthritis

Key clinical point: Fatigue is a prevalent phenomenon among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and strongly correlated with quality of life (QoL), disease activity, and levels of serum interleukin-17 (IL-17).

Major finding: Level of PsA disease activity was significantly correlated with measures of fatigue, functional capacity, and QoL (P less than .001). Moreover, QoL (P = .001), disease activity (P = .019), and serum IL-17 (P = .029) were significant independent predictive factors for fatigue.

Study details: The findings come from an analysis of 80 adults with PsA from the outpatient clinics of Physical Medicine, Rheumatology, & Rehabilitation Department, Tanta University Hospitals randomly selected during the period from December 2019 to August 2020.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. All the authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Gado SE et al. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2021 Apr 2. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2021.1905522.

Key clinical point: Fatigue is a prevalent phenomenon among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and strongly correlated with quality of life (QoL), disease activity, and levels of serum interleukin-17 (IL-17).

Major finding: Level of PsA disease activity was significantly correlated with measures of fatigue, functional capacity, and QoL (P less than .001). Moreover, QoL (P = .001), disease activity (P = .019), and serum IL-17 (P = .029) were significant independent predictive factors for fatigue.

Study details: The findings come from an analysis of 80 adults with PsA from the outpatient clinics of Physical Medicine, Rheumatology, & Rehabilitation Department, Tanta University Hospitals randomly selected during the period from December 2019 to August 2020.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. All the authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Gado SE et al. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2021 Apr 2. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2021.1905522.

Key clinical point: Fatigue is a prevalent phenomenon among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and strongly correlated with quality of life (QoL), disease activity, and levels of serum interleukin-17 (IL-17).

Major finding: Level of PsA disease activity was significantly correlated with measures of fatigue, functional capacity, and QoL (P less than .001). Moreover, QoL (P = .001), disease activity (P = .019), and serum IL-17 (P = .029) were significant independent predictive factors for fatigue.

Study details: The findings come from an analysis of 80 adults with PsA from the outpatient clinics of Physical Medicine, Rheumatology, & Rehabilitation Department, Tanta University Hospitals randomly selected during the period from December 2019 to August 2020.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. All the authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Gado SE et al. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2021 Apr 2. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2021.1905522.

Key clinical point: Among biologic-naive individuals with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), interleukin-12/23 (IL-12/23) antagonists were less effective than tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors. PDE4 treatment was significantly less effective than TNF-α inhibitors among biologic-experienced individuals.

Major finding: Among biologic-naïve individuals, IL-12/23 was less effective than TNF-α (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.89), whereas PDE4 treatment was less effective than TNF-α inhibitor among biologic-experienced individuals (aRR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.96).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective study of 2,730 commercially insured and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with PsA.

Disclosures: The authors did not declare any specific funding for this research. GC Alexander declared being Chair of FDA’s peripheral and central nervous system advisory committee, serving as a paid advisor to IQVIA, and being a consultant and holding equity in Monument Analytics. JR Curtis declared receiving consultancies and funding from pharmaceutical companies.

Source: Zhang H et al. RMD Open. 2021 Apr 16. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001399.

Key clinical point: Among biologic-naive individuals with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), interleukin-12/23 (IL-12/23) antagonists were less effective than tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors. PDE4 treatment was significantly less effective than TNF-α inhibitors among biologic-experienced individuals.

Major finding: Among biologic-naïve individuals, IL-12/23 was less effective than TNF-α (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.89), whereas PDE4 treatment was less effective than TNF-α inhibitor among biologic-experienced individuals (aRR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.96).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective study of 2,730 commercially insured and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with PsA.

Disclosures: The authors did not declare any specific funding for this research. GC Alexander declared being Chair of FDA’s peripheral and central nervous system advisory committee, serving as a paid advisor to IQVIA, and being a consultant and holding equity in Monument Analytics. JR Curtis declared receiving consultancies and funding from pharmaceutical companies.

Source: Zhang H et al. RMD Open. 2021 Apr 16. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001399.

Key clinical point: Among biologic-naive individuals with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), interleukin-12/23 (IL-12/23) antagonists were less effective than tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors. PDE4 treatment was significantly less effective than TNF-α inhibitors among biologic-experienced individuals.

Major finding: Among biologic-naïve individuals, IL-12/23 was less effective than TNF-α (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.89), whereas PDE4 treatment was less effective than TNF-α inhibitor among biologic-experienced individuals (aRR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.96).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective study of 2,730 commercially insured and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with PsA.

Disclosures: The authors did not declare any specific funding for this research. GC Alexander declared being Chair of FDA’s peripheral and central nervous system advisory committee, serving as a paid advisor to IQVIA, and being a consultant and holding equity in Monument Analytics. JR Curtis declared receiving consultancies and funding from pharmaceutical companies.

Source: Zhang H et al. RMD Open. 2021 Apr 16. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001399.

Key clinical point: Clinical examination (CE) enthesitis indices should be interpreted with caution in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and concurrent fibromyalgia. Imaging including ultrasound should be preferred over CE to detect enthesitis in these patients.

Major finding: Patients with PsA with vs. without fibromyalgia had higher CE enthesitis scores (Leeds Enthesitis Index, 2.7 vs. 1.0; P less than .0001; Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Enthesitis Index, 7.6 vs. 2.4; P less than .0001); however, ultrasound total scores (P = .87) were not different. No correlation was observed between ultrasound scores and CE enthesitis indices in patients having concurrent fibromyalgia.

Study details: Findings are from a prospective study of 106 outpatients with established PsA who underwent CE for enthesitis and ultrasonographic examination for inflammatory and structural lesions of enthesitis.

Disclosures: The authors received no financial support for research, authorship, and/or publication of the article. The authors declared no competing interests.

Source: Sapsford M et al. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021 Mar 29. doi: 10.1177/1759720X211003812.

Key clinical point: Clinical examination (CE) enthesitis indices should be interpreted with caution in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and concurrent fibromyalgia. Imaging including ultrasound should be preferred over CE to detect enthesitis in these patients.

Major finding: Patients with PsA with vs. without fibromyalgia had higher CE enthesitis scores (Leeds Enthesitis Index, 2.7 vs. 1.0; P less than .0001; Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Enthesitis Index, 7.6 vs. 2.4; P less than .0001); however, ultrasound total scores (P = .87) were not different. No correlation was observed between ultrasound scores and CE enthesitis indices in patients having concurrent fibromyalgia.

Study details: Findings are from a prospective study of 106 outpatients with established PsA who underwent CE for enthesitis and ultrasonographic examination for inflammatory and structural lesions of enthesitis.

Disclosures: The authors received no financial support for research, authorship, and/or publication of the article. The authors declared no competing interests.

Source: Sapsford M et al. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021 Mar 29. doi: 10.1177/1759720X211003812.

Key clinical point: Clinical examination (CE) enthesitis indices should be interpreted with caution in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and concurrent fibromyalgia. Imaging including ultrasound should be preferred over CE to detect enthesitis in these patients.

Major finding: Patients with PsA with vs. without fibromyalgia had higher CE enthesitis scores (Leeds Enthesitis Index, 2.7 vs. 1.0; P less than .0001; Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Enthesitis Index, 7.6 vs. 2.4; P less than .0001); however, ultrasound total scores (P = .87) were not different. No correlation was observed between ultrasound scores and CE enthesitis indices in patients having concurrent fibromyalgia.

Study details: Findings are from a prospective study of 106 outpatients with established PsA who underwent CE for enthesitis and ultrasonographic examination for inflammatory and structural lesions of enthesitis.

Disclosures: The authors received no financial support for research, authorship, and/or publication of the article. The authors declared no competing interests.

Source: Sapsford M et al. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021 Mar 29. doi: 10.1177/1759720X211003812.

Key clinical point: Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are more likely to have additional medical conditions beyond skin and joints than those with psoriasis alone.

Major finding: During follow-up, 12% of patients had an indication for PsA. Rates of comorbidities like hypertension, hyperlipidemia, fatigue, diabetes, chronic pulmonary disease, obesity, cardiovascular disease, depression, and anxiety were at least 1.1-1.7 times higher in the psoriasis-PsA vs. psoriasis-only group.

Study details: This was a retrospective study of 19,333 patients with prevalent psoriasis with no prior evidence of PsA from the United States.

Disclosures: The study was funded by UCB Pharma. R Suruki and E Lee declared being employees and shareholders of UCB Pharma. M Skornicki, P Prince, and A Louder declared being employees of Aetion Inc.

Source: Skornicki M et al. Adv Ther. 2021 Apr 5. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01698-7.

Key clinical point: Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are more likely to have additional medical conditions beyond skin and joints than those with psoriasis alone.

Major finding: During follow-up, 12% of patients had an indication for PsA. Rates of comorbidities like hypertension, hyperlipidemia, fatigue, diabetes, chronic pulmonary disease, obesity, cardiovascular disease, depression, and anxiety were at least 1.1-1.7 times higher in the psoriasis-PsA vs. psoriasis-only group.

Study details: This was a retrospective study of 19,333 patients with prevalent psoriasis with no prior evidence of PsA from the United States.

Disclosures: The study was funded by UCB Pharma. R Suruki and E Lee declared being employees and shareholders of UCB Pharma. M Skornicki, P Prince, and A Louder declared being employees of Aetion Inc.

Source: Skornicki M et al. Adv Ther. 2021 Apr 5. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01698-7.

Key clinical point: Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are more likely to have additional medical conditions beyond skin and joints than those with psoriasis alone.

Major finding: During follow-up, 12% of patients had an indication for PsA. Rates of comorbidities like hypertension, hyperlipidemia, fatigue, diabetes, chronic pulmonary disease, obesity, cardiovascular disease, depression, and anxiety were at least 1.1-1.7 times higher in the psoriasis-PsA vs. psoriasis-only group.

Study details: This was a retrospective study of 19,333 patients with prevalent psoriasis with no prior evidence of PsA from the United States.

Disclosures: The study was funded by UCB Pharma. R Suruki and E Lee declared being employees and shareholders of UCB Pharma. M Skornicki, P Prince, and A Louder declared being employees of Aetion Inc.

Source: Skornicki M et al. Adv Ther. 2021 Apr 5. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01698-7.

Key clinical point: Under tight settings for monitoring and treatment, women vs. men with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) had more severe disease and were less likely to achieve low disease activity (LDA), particularly if overweight.

Major finding: Women vs. men had worse mean PsA Disease Activity Score (3.5 vs. 2.7; P less than .001) and were more likely to not reach LDA (odds ratio [OR], 1.62; P = .002). Being overweight was associated with not reaching LDA (OR, 2.41-3.43; P less than .05) in women but not in men.

Study details: Findings are from secondary analysis of routine practice data of 855 outpatients with PsA who were critically monitored and treated.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the regional junior researcher grant from the Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, and the Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. The authors declared no competing interests.

Source: Mulder MLM et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Apr 8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab338.

Key clinical point: Under tight settings for monitoring and treatment, women vs. men with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) had more severe disease and were less likely to achieve low disease activity (LDA), particularly if overweight.

Major finding: Women vs. men had worse mean PsA Disease Activity Score (3.5 vs. 2.7; P less than .001) and were more likely to not reach LDA (odds ratio [OR], 1.62; P = .002). Being overweight was associated with not reaching LDA (OR, 2.41-3.43; P less than .05) in women but not in men.

Study details: Findings are from secondary analysis of routine practice data of 855 outpatients with PsA who were critically monitored and treated.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the regional junior researcher grant from the Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, and the Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. The authors declared no competing interests.

Source: Mulder MLM et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Apr 8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab338.

Key clinical point: Under tight settings for monitoring and treatment, women vs. men with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) had more severe disease and were less likely to achieve low disease activity (LDA), particularly if overweight.

Major finding: Women vs. men had worse mean PsA Disease Activity Score (3.5 vs. 2.7; P less than .001) and were more likely to not reach LDA (odds ratio [OR], 1.62; P = .002). Being overweight was associated with not reaching LDA (OR, 2.41-3.43; P less than .05) in women but not in men.

Study details: Findings are from secondary analysis of routine practice data of 855 outpatients with PsA who were critically monitored and treated.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the regional junior researcher grant from the Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, and the Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. The authors declared no competing interests.

Source: Mulder MLM et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Apr 8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab338.

Key clinical point: In patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), efficacy of the novel interleukin (IL)-23p19 inhibitor guselkumab for joint improvement was comparable to IL-17A and subcutaneous tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors while offering a better efficacy for skin manifestations.

Major finding: Guselkumab 100 mg every 8 weeks and every 4 weeks were comparable to IL-17A and subcutaneous TNF inhibitors for American College of Rheumatology 20 response. Guselkumab showed better Psoriasis Area Severity Index 90 and 75 responses than most of the other agents.

Study details: Data come from a network meta-analysis of 26 phase 3, randomized controlled trials that evaluated 13 targeted therapies among adults with active PsA.

Disclosures: This work was supported by Janssen Research and Development. The authors including the lead author reported receiving grants, consulting fees, speaker fees, and/or honoraria from various sources. S Peterson, A Schubert, SD Chakravarty, CS Karyekar, and S Nair reported being employees of Janssen Pharmaceuticals and shareholder of Johnson & Johnson.

Source: Mease PJ et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Mar 24. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab119.

Key clinical point: In patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), efficacy of the novel interleukin (IL)-23p19 inhibitor guselkumab for joint improvement was comparable to IL-17A and subcutaneous tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors while offering a better efficacy for skin manifestations.

Major finding: Guselkumab 100 mg every 8 weeks and every 4 weeks were comparable to IL-17A and subcutaneous TNF inhibitors for American College of Rheumatology 20 response. Guselkumab showed better Psoriasis Area Severity Index 90 and 75 responses than most of the other agents.

Study details: Data come from a network meta-analysis of 26 phase 3, randomized controlled trials that evaluated 13 targeted therapies among adults with active PsA.

Disclosures: This work was supported by Janssen Research and Development. The authors including the lead author reported receiving grants, consulting fees, speaker fees, and/or honoraria from various sources. S Peterson, A Schubert, SD Chakravarty, CS Karyekar, and S Nair reported being employees of Janssen Pharmaceuticals and shareholder of Johnson & Johnson.

Source: Mease PJ et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Mar 24. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab119.

Key clinical point: In patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), efficacy of the novel interleukin (IL)-23p19 inhibitor guselkumab for joint improvement was comparable to IL-17A and subcutaneous tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors while offering a better efficacy for skin manifestations.

Major finding: Guselkumab 100 mg every 8 weeks and every 4 weeks were comparable to IL-17A and subcutaneous TNF inhibitors for American College of Rheumatology 20 response. Guselkumab showed better Psoriasis Area Severity Index 90 and 75 responses than most of the other agents.

Study details: Data come from a network meta-analysis of 26 phase 3, randomized controlled trials that evaluated 13 targeted therapies among adults with active PsA.

Disclosures: This work was supported by Janssen Research and Development. The authors including the lead author reported receiving grants, consulting fees, speaker fees, and/or honoraria from various sources. S Peterson, A Schubert, SD Chakravarty, CS Karyekar, and S Nair reported being employees of Janssen Pharmaceuticals and shareholder of Johnson & Johnson.

Source: Mease PJ et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Mar 24. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab119.

Key clinical point: Guselkumab resulted in significantly higher proportions of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with resolved enthesitis than placebo, which continued to improve through 1 year.

Major finding: A significantly higher proportion of patients with enthesitis at baseline achieved resolution by week 24 when treated with guselkumab 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) and guselkumab 100 mg at week 0, 4, and then every 8 weeks (Q8W) than placebo (45% and 50% vs. 29%; P = .0301) which continued to rise in patients who continued guselkumab with 58% achieving resolution by week 52.

Study details: Findings are from a pooled analysis of DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2 phase 3 trials involving patients with active PsA despite standard therapies randomly allocated to subcutaneous guselkumab 100 mg Q4W, guselkumab 100 mg Q8W, or placebo.

Disclosures: The work was supported by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. The authors reported receiving research grants, honoraria, and/or consultation/speaker fees from various sources, including Janssen. Some authors declared being employees of Janssen and owning stocks of Johnson & Johnson.

Source: McGonagle D et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Apr 6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab285.

Key clinical point: Guselkumab resulted in significantly higher proportions of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with resolved enthesitis than placebo, which continued to improve through 1 year.

Major finding: A significantly higher proportion of patients with enthesitis at baseline achieved resolution by week 24 when treated with guselkumab 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) and guselkumab 100 mg at week 0, 4, and then every 8 weeks (Q8W) than placebo (45% and 50% vs. 29%; P = .0301) which continued to rise in patients who continued guselkumab with 58% achieving resolution by week 52.

Study details: Findings are from a pooled analysis of DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2 phase 3 trials involving patients with active PsA despite standard therapies randomly allocated to subcutaneous guselkumab 100 mg Q4W, guselkumab 100 mg Q8W, or placebo.

Disclosures: The work was supported by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. The authors reported receiving research grants, honoraria, and/or consultation/speaker fees from various sources, including Janssen. Some authors declared being employees of Janssen and owning stocks of Johnson & Johnson.

Source: McGonagle D et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Apr 6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab285.

Key clinical point: Guselkumab resulted in significantly higher proportions of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with resolved enthesitis than placebo, which continued to improve through 1 year.

Major finding: A significantly higher proportion of patients with enthesitis at baseline achieved resolution by week 24 when treated with guselkumab 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) and guselkumab 100 mg at week 0, 4, and then every 8 weeks (Q8W) than placebo (45% and 50% vs. 29%; P = .0301) which continued to rise in patients who continued guselkumab with 58% achieving resolution by week 52.

Study details: Findings are from a pooled analysis of DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2 phase 3 trials involving patients with active PsA despite standard therapies randomly allocated to subcutaneous guselkumab 100 mg Q4W, guselkumab 100 mg Q8W, or placebo.

Disclosures: The work was supported by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. The authors reported receiving research grants, honoraria, and/or consultation/speaker fees from various sources, including Janssen. Some authors declared being employees of Janssen and owning stocks of Johnson & Johnson.

Source: McGonagle D et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Apr 6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab285.

Key clinical point: Final analysis of OPAL Balance confirms long-term safety and efficacy of tofacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

Major finding: Only 1 instance of mortality occurred in tofacitinib group during the risk period (incidence, 0.1 patients with events [95% confidence interval, 0.0-0.3] per 100 person-years). The incidences of adverse events for herpes zoster, serious infections, opportunistic infections, adjudicated malignancies, and major adverse cardiovascular events were consistent as reported previously. Efficacy was sustained up to 36 months.

Study details: Findings are from OPAL Balance, a 36-month, long-term extension phase 3 study involving 686 adult patients with active PsA. Eligible patients (n=180) from the open-label phase entered the randomized, double-blind, 12-month methotrexate withdrawal substudy where they received open-label tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily with either masked placebo or masked methotrexate.

Disclosures: OPAL Balance was funded by Pfizer. The authors including the lead author reported receiving grants/consulting fees, speaker fees, and/or honoraria from various sources including Pfizer. Six of the authors reported being employees and shareholders of Pfizer.

Source: Nash P et al. Lancet Rheumatol. 2021 Apr 1. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00010-2.

Key clinical point: Final analysis of OPAL Balance confirms long-term safety and efficacy of tofacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

Major finding: Only 1 instance of mortality occurred in tofacitinib group during the risk period (incidence, 0.1 patients with events [95% confidence interval, 0.0-0.3] per 100 person-years). The incidences of adverse events for herpes zoster, serious infections, opportunistic infections, adjudicated malignancies, and major adverse cardiovascular events were consistent as reported previously. Efficacy was sustained up to 36 months.

Study details: Findings are from OPAL Balance, a 36-month, long-term extension phase 3 study involving 686 adult patients with active PsA. Eligible patients (n=180) from the open-label phase entered the randomized, double-blind, 12-month methotrexate withdrawal substudy where they received open-label tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily with either masked placebo or masked methotrexate.

Disclosures: OPAL Balance was funded by Pfizer. The authors including the lead author reported receiving grants/consulting fees, speaker fees, and/or honoraria from various sources including Pfizer. Six of the authors reported being employees and shareholders of Pfizer.

Source: Nash P et al. Lancet Rheumatol. 2021 Apr 1. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00010-2.

Key clinical point: Final analysis of OPAL Balance confirms long-term safety and efficacy of tofacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

Major finding: Only 1 instance of mortality occurred in tofacitinib group during the risk period (incidence, 0.1 patients with events [95% confidence interval, 0.0-0.3] per 100 person-years). The incidences of adverse events for herpes zoster, serious infections, opportunistic infections, adjudicated malignancies, and major adverse cardiovascular events were consistent as reported previously. Efficacy was sustained up to 36 months.

Study details: Findings are from OPAL Balance, a 36-month, long-term extension phase 3 study involving 686 adult patients with active PsA. Eligible patients (n=180) from the open-label phase entered the randomized, double-blind, 12-month methotrexate withdrawal substudy where they received open-label tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily with either masked placebo or masked methotrexate.

Disclosures: OPAL Balance was funded by Pfizer. The authors including the lead author reported receiving grants/consulting fees, speaker fees, and/or honoraria from various sources including Pfizer. Six of the authors reported being employees and shareholders of Pfizer.

Source: Nash P et al. Lancet Rheumatol. 2021 Apr 1. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00010-2.

Key clinical point: Proportion of patients with psoriatic arthritis with at least 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) response was significantly higher with upadacitinib than placebo; however, adverse events were more frequent with upadacitinib.

Major finding: The percentage of patients with ACR20 response at week 12 was higher with upadacitinib 15 mg (70.6%) and 30 mg (78.5%) vs. placebo (36.2%; P less than .001). Incidence of serious infections and serious adverse events with upadacitinib 15 mg, 30 mg, and placebo were 1.2%, 2.6%, and 0.9% and 3.3%, 6.1%, and 3.1%, respectively.

Study details: Findings are from SELECT-Psa 1, a phase 3 trial involving 1,704 patients with PsA who had an inadequate response to at least 1 nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and were randomly allocated to receive either oral upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg once daily, placebo, or subcutaneous adalimumab (40 mg every other week).

Disclosures: The trial was sponsored by Abbvie. The authors reported receiving consulting fees, advisory board fees, lecture fees, travel support, grant support, and/or being an employee of and/or owning stocks in various pharmaceutical companies, including Abbvie.

Source: McInnes IB et al. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022516.

Key clinical point: Proportion of patients with psoriatic arthritis with at least 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) response was significantly higher with upadacitinib than placebo; however, adverse events were more frequent with upadacitinib.

Major finding: The percentage of patients with ACR20 response at week 12 was higher with upadacitinib 15 mg (70.6%) and 30 mg (78.5%) vs. placebo (36.2%; P less than .001). Incidence of serious infections and serious adverse events with upadacitinib 15 mg, 30 mg, and placebo were 1.2%, 2.6%, and 0.9% and 3.3%, 6.1%, and 3.1%, respectively.

Study details: Findings are from SELECT-Psa 1, a phase 3 trial involving 1,704 patients with PsA who had an inadequate response to at least 1 nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and were randomly allocated to receive either oral upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg once daily, placebo, or subcutaneous adalimumab (40 mg every other week).

Disclosures: The trial was sponsored by Abbvie. The authors reported receiving consulting fees, advisory board fees, lecture fees, travel support, grant support, and/or being an employee of and/or owning stocks in various pharmaceutical companies, including Abbvie.

Source: McInnes IB et al. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022516.

Key clinical point: Proportion of patients with psoriatic arthritis with at least 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) response was significantly higher with upadacitinib than placebo; however, adverse events were more frequent with upadacitinib.

Major finding: The percentage of patients with ACR20 response at week 12 was higher with upadacitinib 15 mg (70.6%) and 30 mg (78.5%) vs. placebo (36.2%; P less than .001). Incidence of serious infections and serious adverse events with upadacitinib 15 mg, 30 mg, and placebo were 1.2%, 2.6%, and 0.9% and 3.3%, 6.1%, and 3.1%, respectively.

Study details: Findings are from SELECT-Psa 1, a phase 3 trial involving 1,704 patients with PsA who had an inadequate response to at least 1 nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and were randomly allocated to receive either oral upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg once daily, placebo, or subcutaneous adalimumab (40 mg every other week).

Disclosures: The trial was sponsored by Abbvie. The authors reported receiving consulting fees, advisory board fees, lecture fees, travel support, grant support, and/or being an employee of and/or owning stocks in various pharmaceutical companies, including Abbvie.

Source: McInnes IB et al. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022516.

People with psoriasis have a higher risk of infection with COVID-19 than the general population, but some systemic treatments appear to lower risk in patients, compared with those on topical therapy, a new study finds.

“Our study results suggest that psoriasis is an independent risk factor for COVID-19 illness,” study coauthor Jeffrey Liu, a medical student at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, said in an interview after he presented the findings at the American Academy of Dermatology Virtual Meeting Experience. “And our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that certain systemic agents may confer a protective effect against COVID-19 illness.”

Mr. Liu and coinvestigators used a Symphony Health dataset to analyze the health records of 167,027 U.S. patients diagnosed with psoriasis and a control group of 1,002,162 patients. The participants, all at least 20 years old, had been treated for psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis from May 2019 through Jan. 1, 2020, and were tracked until Nov. 11, 2020.

The ages and races of peoples in the two groups were roughly similar. Overall, 55% were women and 75% were White, and their average age was 58 years. Type 2 diabetes was more common in the psoriasis group than the control group (23% vs. 16%), as was obesity (27% vs. 15%). Of the patients with psoriasis, 60% were on topical treatments, 19% were on oral therapies, and 22% were on biologic therapy, with only a few taking both oral and biologic therapies.

After adjustment for age and gender, patients with psoriasis were 33% more likely than the control group to develop COVID-19 (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-1.38; P < .0001).

In a separate analysis, the gap persisted after adjustment for demographics and comorbidities: Patients with psoriasis had a higher rate of COVID-19 infection vs. controls (adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.13-1.23; P < .0001). Among all patients, non-White race, older age, and comorbidities were all linked to higher risk of COVID-19 (all P < .0001).

Psoriasis might make patients more vulnerable to COVID-19 because the presence of up-regulated genes in psoriatic skin “may lead to systemic hyperinflammation and sensitization of patients with psoriasis to proinflammatory cytokine storm,” Mr. Liu said. This, in turn, may trigger more severe symptomatic disease that requires medical treatment, he said.

Reduced risk, compared with topical therapies

After adjustment for age and gender, those treated with TNF-alpha inhibitors, methotrexate, and apremilast (Otezla) all had statistically lower risks of COVID-19 vs. those on topical therapy (aIRR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95; P < .0029 for TNF-alpha inhibitors; aIRR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67-0.86; P < .0001 for methotrexate; and aIRR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.85; P < .0006 for apremilast).

Reduced risk held true for those in the separate analysis after adjustment for comorbidities and demographics (respectively, aOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-1.00; P < .0469; aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71-0.92; P < .0011; and aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57-0.87; P < .0014).

Apremilast and methotrexate may boost protection against COVID-19 by inhibiting the body’s production of cytokines, Mr. Liu said.

One message of the study is that “dermatologists should not be scared of prescribing biologics or oral therapies for psoriasis,” the study’s lead author Jashin J. Wu, MD, of the Dermatology Research and Education Foundation in Irvine, Calif., said in an interview.

However, the results on the effects of systemic therapies were not all positive. Interleukin (IL)–17 inhibitors were an outlier: After adjustment for age and gender, patients treated with this class of drugs were 36% more likely to develop COVID-19 than those on oral agents (aIRR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.13-1.63; P < .0009).

Among patients on biologics, those taking IL-17 inhibitors had the highest risk of COVID-19, Mr. Liu said. “The risk was higher in this class regardless of reference group – general population, the topical cohort, and the oral cohort,” he said. “This may relate to the observation that this biologic class exerts more broad immunosuppressive effects on antiviral host immunity. Notably, large meta-estimates of pivotal trials have observed increased risk of respiratory tract infections for patients on IL-17 inhibitors.”

In an interview, Erica Dommasch, MD, MPH, of the department of dermatology at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, cautioned that “the data from this study is very hard to interpret.”

It’s likely that some patients with psoriasis on systemic medications “may have been the most careful about limiting exposures,” she said. “Thus, it’s hard to account for behavioral changes in individuals that may have led to the decreased incidence in psoriasis in patients on systemic agents versus topical therapy alone.”

Patients with psoriasis may also be tested more often for COVID-19, and unmeasured comorbidities like chronic kidney disease may play a role too, she said. Still, she added, “it’s reassuring that the authors did not find an increased rate of COVID among psoriasis patients on systemic agents versus topicals alone.” And she agreed with Dr. Wu about the importance of treating psoriasis with therapy beyond topical treatments during the pandemic: “Providers should feel comfortable prescribing systemic medications to psoriasis patients when otherwise appropriate.”

As for the next steps, Dr. Wu said, “we will be exploring more about the prognosis of COVID-19 infection in psoriasis patients. In addition, we will be exploring the relationship of COVID-19 infection with other inflammatory skin diseases, such as atopic dermatitis.”

No study funding is reported. Dr. Wu discloses investigator, consultant, or speaker relationships with AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Arcutis, Aristea Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dermavant, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Mindera, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi Genzyme, Solius, Sun Pharmaceutical, UCB, Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America, and Zerigo Health. Mr. Liu and Dr. Dommasch have no disclosures.

People with psoriasis have a higher risk of infection with COVID-19 than the general population, but some systemic treatments appear to lower risk in patients, compared with those on topical therapy, a new study finds.

“Our study results suggest that psoriasis is an independent risk factor for COVID-19 illness,” study coauthor Jeffrey Liu, a medical student at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, said in an interview after he presented the findings at the American Academy of Dermatology Virtual Meeting Experience. “And our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that certain systemic agents may confer a protective effect against COVID-19 illness.”

Mr. Liu and coinvestigators used a Symphony Health dataset to analyze the health records of 167,027 U.S. patients diagnosed with psoriasis and a control group of 1,002,162 patients. The participants, all at least 20 years old, had been treated for psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis from May 2019 through Jan. 1, 2020, and were tracked until Nov. 11, 2020.

The ages and races of peoples in the two groups were roughly similar. Overall, 55% were women and 75% were White, and their average age was 58 years. Type 2 diabetes was more common in the psoriasis group than the control group (23% vs. 16%), as was obesity (27% vs. 15%). Of the patients with psoriasis, 60% were on topical treatments, 19% were on oral therapies, and 22% were on biologic therapy, with only a few taking both oral and biologic therapies.

After adjustment for age and gender, patients with psoriasis were 33% more likely than the control group to develop COVID-19 (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-1.38; P < .0001).

In a separate analysis, the gap persisted after adjustment for demographics and comorbidities: Patients with psoriasis had a higher rate of COVID-19 infection vs. controls (adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.13-1.23; P < .0001). Among all patients, non-White race, older age, and comorbidities were all linked to higher risk of COVID-19 (all P < .0001).

Psoriasis might make patients more vulnerable to COVID-19 because the presence of up-regulated genes in psoriatic skin “may lead to systemic hyperinflammation and sensitization of patients with psoriasis to proinflammatory cytokine storm,” Mr. Liu said. This, in turn, may trigger more severe symptomatic disease that requires medical treatment, he said.

Reduced risk, compared with topical therapies

After adjustment for age and gender, those treated with TNF-alpha inhibitors, methotrexate, and apremilast (Otezla) all had statistically lower risks of COVID-19 vs. those on topical therapy (aIRR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95; P < .0029 for TNF-alpha inhibitors; aIRR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67-0.86; P < .0001 for methotrexate; and aIRR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.85; P < .0006 for apremilast).

Reduced risk held true for those in the separate analysis after adjustment for comorbidities and demographics (respectively, aOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-1.00; P < .0469; aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71-0.92; P < .0011; and aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57-0.87; P < .0014).

Apremilast and methotrexate may boost protection against COVID-19 by inhibiting the body’s production of cytokines, Mr. Liu said.

One message of the study is that “dermatologists should not be scared of prescribing biologics or oral therapies for psoriasis,” the study’s lead author Jashin J. Wu, MD, of the Dermatology Research and Education Foundation in Irvine, Calif., said in an interview.

However, the results on the effects of systemic therapies were not all positive. Interleukin (IL)–17 inhibitors were an outlier: After adjustment for age and gender, patients treated with this class of drugs were 36% more likely to develop COVID-19 than those on oral agents (aIRR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.13-1.63; P < .0009).

Among patients on biologics, those taking IL-17 inhibitors had the highest risk of COVID-19, Mr. Liu said. “The risk was higher in this class regardless of reference group – general population, the topical cohort, and the oral cohort,” he said. “This may relate to the observation that this biologic class exerts more broad immunosuppressive effects on antiviral host immunity. Notably, large meta-estimates of pivotal trials have observed increased risk of respiratory tract infections for patients on IL-17 inhibitors.”

In an interview, Erica Dommasch, MD, MPH, of the department of dermatology at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, cautioned that “the data from this study is very hard to interpret.”

It’s likely that some patients with psoriasis on systemic medications “may have been the most careful about limiting exposures,” she said. “Thus, it’s hard to account for behavioral changes in individuals that may have led to the decreased incidence in psoriasis in patients on systemic agents versus topical therapy alone.”

Patients with psoriasis may also be tested more often for COVID-19, and unmeasured comorbidities like chronic kidney disease may play a role too, she said. Still, she added, “it’s reassuring that the authors did not find an increased rate of COVID among psoriasis patients on systemic agents versus topicals alone.” And she agreed with Dr. Wu about the importance of treating psoriasis with therapy beyond topical treatments during the pandemic: “Providers should feel comfortable prescribing systemic medications to psoriasis patients when otherwise appropriate.”

As for the next steps, Dr. Wu said, “we will be exploring more about the prognosis of COVID-19 infection in psoriasis patients. In addition, we will be exploring the relationship of COVID-19 infection with other inflammatory skin diseases, such as atopic dermatitis.”

No study funding is reported. Dr. Wu discloses investigator, consultant, or speaker relationships with AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Arcutis, Aristea Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dermavant, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Mindera, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi Genzyme, Solius, Sun Pharmaceutical, UCB, Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America, and Zerigo Health. Mr. Liu and Dr. Dommasch have no disclosures.

People with psoriasis have a higher risk of infection with COVID-19 than the general population, but some systemic treatments appear to lower risk in patients, compared with those on topical therapy, a new study finds.

“Our study results suggest that psoriasis is an independent risk factor for COVID-19 illness,” study coauthor Jeffrey Liu, a medical student at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, said in an interview after he presented the findings at the American Academy of Dermatology Virtual Meeting Experience. “And our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that certain systemic agents may confer a protective effect against COVID-19 illness.”

Mr. Liu and coinvestigators used a Symphony Health dataset to analyze the health records of 167,027 U.S. patients diagnosed with psoriasis and a control group of 1,002,162 patients. The participants, all at least 20 years old, had been treated for psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis from May 2019 through Jan. 1, 2020, and were tracked until Nov. 11, 2020.

The ages and races of peoples in the two groups were roughly similar. Overall, 55% were women and 75% were White, and their average age was 58 years. Type 2 diabetes was more common in the psoriasis group than the control group (23% vs. 16%), as was obesity (27% vs. 15%). Of the patients with psoriasis, 60% were on topical treatments, 19% were on oral therapies, and 22% were on biologic therapy, with only a few taking both oral and biologic therapies.

After adjustment for age and gender, patients with psoriasis were 33% more likely than the control group to develop COVID-19 (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-1.38; P < .0001).

In a separate analysis, the gap persisted after adjustment for demographics and comorbidities: Patients with psoriasis had a higher rate of COVID-19 infection vs. controls (adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.13-1.23; P < .0001). Among all patients, non-White race, older age, and comorbidities were all linked to higher risk of COVID-19 (all P < .0001).

Psoriasis might make patients more vulnerable to COVID-19 because the presence of up-regulated genes in psoriatic skin “may lead to systemic hyperinflammation and sensitization of patients with psoriasis to proinflammatory cytokine storm,” Mr. Liu said. This, in turn, may trigger more severe symptomatic disease that requires medical treatment, he said.

Reduced risk, compared with topical therapies

After adjustment for age and gender, those treated with TNF-alpha inhibitors, methotrexate, and apremilast (Otezla) all had statistically lower risks of COVID-19 vs. those on topical therapy (aIRR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95; P < .0029 for TNF-alpha inhibitors; aIRR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67-0.86; P < .0001 for methotrexate; and aIRR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.85; P < .0006 for apremilast).

Reduced risk held true for those in the separate analysis after adjustment for comorbidities and demographics (respectively, aOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-1.00; P < .0469; aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71-0.92; P < .0011; and aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57-0.87; P < .0014).

Apremilast and methotrexate may boost protection against COVID-19 by inhibiting the body’s production of cytokines, Mr. Liu said.

One message of the study is that “dermatologists should not be scared of prescribing biologics or oral therapies for psoriasis,” the study’s lead author Jashin J. Wu, MD, of the Dermatology Research and Education Foundation in Irvine, Calif., said in an interview.

However, the results on the effects of systemic therapies were not all positive. Interleukin (IL)–17 inhibitors were an outlier: After adjustment for age and gender, patients treated with this class of drugs were 36% more likely to develop COVID-19 than those on oral agents (aIRR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.13-1.63; P < .0009).

Among patients on biologics, those taking IL-17 inhibitors had the highest risk of COVID-19, Mr. Liu said. “The risk was higher in this class regardless of reference group – general population, the topical cohort, and the oral cohort,” he said. “This may relate to the observation that this biologic class exerts more broad immunosuppressive effects on antiviral host immunity. Notably, large meta-estimates of pivotal trials have observed increased risk of respiratory tract infections for patients on IL-17 inhibitors.”

In an interview, Erica Dommasch, MD, MPH, of the department of dermatology at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, cautioned that “the data from this study is very hard to interpret.”

It’s likely that some patients with psoriasis on systemic medications “may have been the most careful about limiting exposures,” she said. “Thus, it’s hard to account for behavioral changes in individuals that may have led to the decreased incidence in psoriasis in patients on systemic agents versus topical therapy alone.”

Patients with psoriasis may also be tested more often for COVID-19, and unmeasured comorbidities like chronic kidney disease may play a role too, she said. Still, she added, “it’s reassuring that the authors did not find an increased rate of COVID among psoriasis patients on systemic agents versus topicals alone.” And she agreed with Dr. Wu about the importance of treating psoriasis with therapy beyond topical treatments during the pandemic: “Providers should feel comfortable prescribing systemic medications to psoriasis patients when otherwise appropriate.”

As for the next steps, Dr. Wu said, “we will be exploring more about the prognosis of COVID-19 infection in psoriasis patients. In addition, we will be exploring the relationship of COVID-19 infection with other inflammatory skin diseases, such as atopic dermatitis.”

No study funding is reported. Dr. Wu discloses investigator, consultant, or speaker relationships with AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Arcutis, Aristea Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dermavant, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Mindera, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi Genzyme, Solius, Sun Pharmaceutical, UCB, Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America, and Zerigo Health. Mr. Liu and Dr. Dommasch have no disclosures.