User login
Monday’s Lillehei Forum highlighted basic research
The Lillehei Forum is a series of presentations on basic research by residents in the field of cardiothoracic surgery.
A targeted near-infrared contrast agent specific for lung adenocarcinomas was assessed for effectiveness during intraoperative molecular imaging (IMI) in animal models. Use of the contrast agent proved significantly more effective at detecting positive margins than did surgery alone, according to a study presented by Jarrod D. Predina, MD.
Initial human experiences with IMI for NSCLC using a fluorescent contrast agent have been limited by technical hurdles including high background noise in inflammatory tissues and low signal output, according to Dr. Predina. As an alternative, he and his colleagues at the University of Pennsylvania hypothesized that a targeted near-infrared contrast agent specific for lung adenocarcinomas would improve sensitivity and specificity during surgery.
Using a mouse surgical model of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that recapitulates local and systemic post-operative recurrences, Dr. Predina and his colleagues at the University of Pennsylvania injected 140 mice intravenously prior to resection with a near-infrared imaging agent (OTL0038). This agent is specific for pulmonary adenocarcinomas due to its high affinity binding of the folate receptor alpha. Tumor-bearing mice were randomized to surgery with or without IMI. Suspicious residual disease was resected and analyzed by immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and immunofluorescence. Based on this data, OTL0038 was tested in a pilot study of five canines with spontaneously occurring lung cancer.
In a local recurrence model system, of 80 mice assessed, surgeons identified 10 positive margins in those randomized to imaging with IMI vs. three positive margins in mice undergoing surgery alone, a significant difference. In systemic recurrence models (60 mice), the mean number of pulmonary nodules located with IMI was 7.2 vs. 3.4 in controls, also a significant difference, according to Dr. Predina.
In five canines with a presumed diagnosis of NSCLC, no toxicity was observed. Four of five canines had fluorescent tumors; the non-fluorescing tumor was discovered to be a metastatic mammary tumor on final pathologic analysis. In one canine, an otherwise undetectable 8-mm pulmonary adenocarcinoma was discovered with IMI.
“Our data suggest that a targeted near-infrared contrast agent may improve IMI technology. Ultimately, this will enable accurate identification of residual disease that may otherwise be overlooked. These results are the basis of an ongoing phase I human trial,” concluded Dr. Predina.
The complexity of the lung has limited the prospects of bioengineering strategies utilizing stem cells and fully decellularized or bioartificial scaffolds, according to Brandon A. Guenthart, MD, of Columbia University.
Dr. Guenthart recently reported on a new strategy to expand the potential pool of transplantable lungs using ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) coupled with a technique called cell replacement in porcine and human lungs. This strategy, rather than attempting to engineer a whole lung from an empty scaffold, aims to replace a sub-set of cells in targeted regions of damaged lungs to aid in the recovery of lung function or reverse a disease phenotype.
Using standard protocols, Dr. Guenthart and his colleagues procured human lungs rejected for transplantation on the basis of standard clinical criteria. Lungs were placed on a custom-built EVLP system, ventilated and perfused. Utilizing video bronchoscopy, real-time transpleural imaging, and a custom designed micro-catheter delivery and occlusion system, the team delivered a decellularization solution into targeted lung regions that resulted in the selective removal of airway epithelium.
Human airway epithelial cells or human-derived alveolar progenitor cells were labeled (with a quantum dot or a near-infrared dye) and delivered into decellularized lung regions. Following delivery, EVLP was continued for 4-6 hours to allow for cell engraftment. Lung wedge samples were collected at each time point for histologic analysis.
Following decellularization, hematoxylin and eosin staining confirmed removal of pseudostratified and columnar epithelium in proximal airways and removal of type I and II pneumocytes in the distal lung. Delivered cells were retained in the lung after EVLP and fixation, and cellular morphology and distribution within the alveoli indicated early engraftment.
“Bioengineering human lungs utilizing advanced therapeutic interventions such as cell replacement may help combat the critical shortage of transplantable lungs,” said Dr. Guenthart. “Additionally, in the future, targeted intervention and patient-specific cell replacement strategies may have translational applications in vivo and eliminate the need for transplantation in select patients,” he concluded.
J. Hunter Mehaffey, MD, of the University of Virginia, presented the results of a study that he and his colleagues performed in order to test an adjunct treatment to improve the results of ECMO for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). They developed a novel method of isolated in vivo lung perfusion (IVLP), which was able to successfully rehabilitate damaged lungs in a porcine model of sepsis-induced injury.
They used a previously validated porcine lung injury model of intravenous lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to induce a systemic inflammatory response and subsequent severe ARDS requiring ECMO support. A total of eight mature adult swine were administered LPS via the external jugular vein followed by sternotomy and central ECMO cannulation (right atrium to ascending aorta).
The left pulmonary artery (inflow) and left superior and inferior pulmonary veins (outflow) were dissected out and cannulated to isolate the left lung, which then underwent 4 hours normorthermic IVLP with Steen Solution followed by 4 hours of lung reperfusion after IVLP decannulation.
Dr. Mehaffey and his colleagues then compared the right (LPS control) and left lungs (LPS+IVLP) of the same animal.
All animals demonstrated a significant reduction in PaO2/FiO2 ratio and total lung compliance 2 hours after the start of LPS infusion. During IVLP, the left (treated) pulmonary vein oxygenation was superior to right (control) pulmonary vein oxygenation. After reperfusion and IVLP decannulation, six (75%) animals had improved lung function allowing for ECMO decannulation.
The left lung showed significant improvement of lung-specific oxygenation compared to the right control at 4 hours of reperfusion. Similarly, total lung compliance improved after targeted rehabilitation of the left lung, according to Dr. Mehaffey. In addition, the wet-to-dry ratio of lung tissue demonstrated significantly reduced edema in the rehabilitated left lungs compared to right controls.
Dr. Mehaffey and his colleagues concluded that IVLP may reduce the duration of ECMO and ventilator support resulting in major reduction in morbidity, mortality, and health care–related costs in patients with ARDS.
The Lillehei Forum is a series of presentations on basic research by residents in the field of cardiothoracic surgery.
A targeted near-infrared contrast agent specific for lung adenocarcinomas was assessed for effectiveness during intraoperative molecular imaging (IMI) in animal models. Use of the contrast agent proved significantly more effective at detecting positive margins than did surgery alone, according to a study presented by Jarrod D. Predina, MD.
Initial human experiences with IMI for NSCLC using a fluorescent contrast agent have been limited by technical hurdles including high background noise in inflammatory tissues and low signal output, according to Dr. Predina. As an alternative, he and his colleagues at the University of Pennsylvania hypothesized that a targeted near-infrared contrast agent specific for lung adenocarcinomas would improve sensitivity and specificity during surgery.
Using a mouse surgical model of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that recapitulates local and systemic post-operative recurrences, Dr. Predina and his colleagues at the University of Pennsylvania injected 140 mice intravenously prior to resection with a near-infrared imaging agent (OTL0038). This agent is specific for pulmonary adenocarcinomas due to its high affinity binding of the folate receptor alpha. Tumor-bearing mice were randomized to surgery with or without IMI. Suspicious residual disease was resected and analyzed by immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and immunofluorescence. Based on this data, OTL0038 was tested in a pilot study of five canines with spontaneously occurring lung cancer.
In a local recurrence model system, of 80 mice assessed, surgeons identified 10 positive margins in those randomized to imaging with IMI vs. three positive margins in mice undergoing surgery alone, a significant difference. In systemic recurrence models (60 mice), the mean number of pulmonary nodules located with IMI was 7.2 vs. 3.4 in controls, also a significant difference, according to Dr. Predina.
In five canines with a presumed diagnosis of NSCLC, no toxicity was observed. Four of five canines had fluorescent tumors; the non-fluorescing tumor was discovered to be a metastatic mammary tumor on final pathologic analysis. In one canine, an otherwise undetectable 8-mm pulmonary adenocarcinoma was discovered with IMI.
“Our data suggest that a targeted near-infrared contrast agent may improve IMI technology. Ultimately, this will enable accurate identification of residual disease that may otherwise be overlooked. These results are the basis of an ongoing phase I human trial,” concluded Dr. Predina.
The complexity of the lung has limited the prospects of bioengineering strategies utilizing stem cells and fully decellularized or bioartificial scaffolds, according to Brandon A. Guenthart, MD, of Columbia University.
Dr. Guenthart recently reported on a new strategy to expand the potential pool of transplantable lungs using ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) coupled with a technique called cell replacement in porcine and human lungs. This strategy, rather than attempting to engineer a whole lung from an empty scaffold, aims to replace a sub-set of cells in targeted regions of damaged lungs to aid in the recovery of lung function or reverse a disease phenotype.
Using standard protocols, Dr. Guenthart and his colleagues procured human lungs rejected for transplantation on the basis of standard clinical criteria. Lungs were placed on a custom-built EVLP system, ventilated and perfused. Utilizing video bronchoscopy, real-time transpleural imaging, and a custom designed micro-catheter delivery and occlusion system, the team delivered a decellularization solution into targeted lung regions that resulted in the selective removal of airway epithelium.
Human airway epithelial cells or human-derived alveolar progenitor cells were labeled (with a quantum dot or a near-infrared dye) and delivered into decellularized lung regions. Following delivery, EVLP was continued for 4-6 hours to allow for cell engraftment. Lung wedge samples were collected at each time point for histologic analysis.
Following decellularization, hematoxylin and eosin staining confirmed removal of pseudostratified and columnar epithelium in proximal airways and removal of type I and II pneumocytes in the distal lung. Delivered cells were retained in the lung after EVLP and fixation, and cellular morphology and distribution within the alveoli indicated early engraftment.
“Bioengineering human lungs utilizing advanced therapeutic interventions such as cell replacement may help combat the critical shortage of transplantable lungs,” said Dr. Guenthart. “Additionally, in the future, targeted intervention and patient-specific cell replacement strategies may have translational applications in vivo and eliminate the need for transplantation in select patients,” he concluded.
J. Hunter Mehaffey, MD, of the University of Virginia, presented the results of a study that he and his colleagues performed in order to test an adjunct treatment to improve the results of ECMO for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). They developed a novel method of isolated in vivo lung perfusion (IVLP), which was able to successfully rehabilitate damaged lungs in a porcine model of sepsis-induced injury.
They used a previously validated porcine lung injury model of intravenous lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to induce a systemic inflammatory response and subsequent severe ARDS requiring ECMO support. A total of eight mature adult swine were administered LPS via the external jugular vein followed by sternotomy and central ECMO cannulation (right atrium to ascending aorta).
The left pulmonary artery (inflow) and left superior and inferior pulmonary veins (outflow) were dissected out and cannulated to isolate the left lung, which then underwent 4 hours normorthermic IVLP with Steen Solution followed by 4 hours of lung reperfusion after IVLP decannulation.
Dr. Mehaffey and his colleagues then compared the right (LPS control) and left lungs (LPS+IVLP) of the same animal.
All animals demonstrated a significant reduction in PaO2/FiO2 ratio and total lung compliance 2 hours after the start of LPS infusion. During IVLP, the left (treated) pulmonary vein oxygenation was superior to right (control) pulmonary vein oxygenation. After reperfusion and IVLP decannulation, six (75%) animals had improved lung function allowing for ECMO decannulation.
The left lung showed significant improvement of lung-specific oxygenation compared to the right control at 4 hours of reperfusion. Similarly, total lung compliance improved after targeted rehabilitation of the left lung, according to Dr. Mehaffey. In addition, the wet-to-dry ratio of lung tissue demonstrated significantly reduced edema in the rehabilitated left lungs compared to right controls.
Dr. Mehaffey and his colleagues concluded that IVLP may reduce the duration of ECMO and ventilator support resulting in major reduction in morbidity, mortality, and health care–related costs in patients with ARDS.
The Lillehei Forum is a series of presentations on basic research by residents in the field of cardiothoracic surgery.
A targeted near-infrared contrast agent specific for lung adenocarcinomas was assessed for effectiveness during intraoperative molecular imaging (IMI) in animal models. Use of the contrast agent proved significantly more effective at detecting positive margins than did surgery alone, according to a study presented by Jarrod D. Predina, MD.
Initial human experiences with IMI for NSCLC using a fluorescent contrast agent have been limited by technical hurdles including high background noise in inflammatory tissues and low signal output, according to Dr. Predina. As an alternative, he and his colleagues at the University of Pennsylvania hypothesized that a targeted near-infrared contrast agent specific for lung adenocarcinomas would improve sensitivity and specificity during surgery.
Using a mouse surgical model of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that recapitulates local and systemic post-operative recurrences, Dr. Predina and his colleagues at the University of Pennsylvania injected 140 mice intravenously prior to resection with a near-infrared imaging agent (OTL0038). This agent is specific for pulmonary adenocarcinomas due to its high affinity binding of the folate receptor alpha. Tumor-bearing mice were randomized to surgery with or without IMI. Suspicious residual disease was resected and analyzed by immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and immunofluorescence. Based on this data, OTL0038 was tested in a pilot study of five canines with spontaneously occurring lung cancer.
In a local recurrence model system, of 80 mice assessed, surgeons identified 10 positive margins in those randomized to imaging with IMI vs. three positive margins in mice undergoing surgery alone, a significant difference. In systemic recurrence models (60 mice), the mean number of pulmonary nodules located with IMI was 7.2 vs. 3.4 in controls, also a significant difference, according to Dr. Predina.
In five canines with a presumed diagnosis of NSCLC, no toxicity was observed. Four of five canines had fluorescent tumors; the non-fluorescing tumor was discovered to be a metastatic mammary tumor on final pathologic analysis. In one canine, an otherwise undetectable 8-mm pulmonary adenocarcinoma was discovered with IMI.
“Our data suggest that a targeted near-infrared contrast agent may improve IMI technology. Ultimately, this will enable accurate identification of residual disease that may otherwise be overlooked. These results are the basis of an ongoing phase I human trial,” concluded Dr. Predina.
The complexity of the lung has limited the prospects of bioengineering strategies utilizing stem cells and fully decellularized or bioartificial scaffolds, according to Brandon A. Guenthart, MD, of Columbia University.
Dr. Guenthart recently reported on a new strategy to expand the potential pool of transplantable lungs using ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) coupled with a technique called cell replacement in porcine and human lungs. This strategy, rather than attempting to engineer a whole lung from an empty scaffold, aims to replace a sub-set of cells in targeted regions of damaged lungs to aid in the recovery of lung function or reverse a disease phenotype.
Using standard protocols, Dr. Guenthart and his colleagues procured human lungs rejected for transplantation on the basis of standard clinical criteria. Lungs were placed on a custom-built EVLP system, ventilated and perfused. Utilizing video bronchoscopy, real-time transpleural imaging, and a custom designed micro-catheter delivery and occlusion system, the team delivered a decellularization solution into targeted lung regions that resulted in the selective removal of airway epithelium.
Human airway epithelial cells or human-derived alveolar progenitor cells were labeled (with a quantum dot or a near-infrared dye) and delivered into decellularized lung regions. Following delivery, EVLP was continued for 4-6 hours to allow for cell engraftment. Lung wedge samples were collected at each time point for histologic analysis.
Following decellularization, hematoxylin and eosin staining confirmed removal of pseudostratified and columnar epithelium in proximal airways and removal of type I and II pneumocytes in the distal lung. Delivered cells were retained in the lung after EVLP and fixation, and cellular morphology and distribution within the alveoli indicated early engraftment.
“Bioengineering human lungs utilizing advanced therapeutic interventions such as cell replacement may help combat the critical shortage of transplantable lungs,” said Dr. Guenthart. “Additionally, in the future, targeted intervention and patient-specific cell replacement strategies may have translational applications in vivo and eliminate the need for transplantation in select patients,” he concluded.
J. Hunter Mehaffey, MD, of the University of Virginia, presented the results of a study that he and his colleagues performed in order to test an adjunct treatment to improve the results of ECMO for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). They developed a novel method of isolated in vivo lung perfusion (IVLP), which was able to successfully rehabilitate damaged lungs in a porcine model of sepsis-induced injury.
They used a previously validated porcine lung injury model of intravenous lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to induce a systemic inflammatory response and subsequent severe ARDS requiring ECMO support. A total of eight mature adult swine were administered LPS via the external jugular vein followed by sternotomy and central ECMO cannulation (right atrium to ascending aorta).
The left pulmonary artery (inflow) and left superior and inferior pulmonary veins (outflow) were dissected out and cannulated to isolate the left lung, which then underwent 4 hours normorthermic IVLP with Steen Solution followed by 4 hours of lung reperfusion after IVLP decannulation.
Dr. Mehaffey and his colleagues then compared the right (LPS control) and left lungs (LPS+IVLP) of the same animal.
All animals demonstrated a significant reduction in PaO2/FiO2 ratio and total lung compliance 2 hours after the start of LPS infusion. During IVLP, the left (treated) pulmonary vein oxygenation was superior to right (control) pulmonary vein oxygenation. After reperfusion and IVLP decannulation, six (75%) animals had improved lung function allowing for ECMO decannulation.
The left lung showed significant improvement of lung-specific oxygenation compared to the right control at 4 hours of reperfusion. Similarly, total lung compliance improved after targeted rehabilitation of the left lung, according to Dr. Mehaffey. In addition, the wet-to-dry ratio of lung tissue demonstrated significantly reduced edema in the rehabilitated left lungs compared to right controls.
Dr. Mehaffey and his colleagues concluded that IVLP may reduce the duration of ECMO and ventilator support resulting in major reduction in morbidity, mortality, and health care–related costs in patients with ARDS.
Monday’s Plenary tackled key issues
Presentations of the latest research in cardiothoracic surgery are the hallmark of the AATS Plenary session and this year’s session did not disappoint.
When repairing large paraesophageal hernias, transthoracic Belsey Mark IV fundoplication led to lower rates of leaks and reoperations than did the widely used laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, according to a study presented by Danuel Laan, MD.
Dr. Laan, a resident at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and his colleagues compared outcomes after Belsey Mark IV fundoplication with those after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.
The researchers performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on all Mayo patients from 2002 to 2011 who underwent repair of a large paraesophageal hernia, defined as having more than 50% of the stomach within the chest. The analysis excluded patients who had already undergone a fundoplication.
Matching 118 Belsey fundoplication patients 1:1 with 118 Nissen fundoplication patients, the investigators compared the two groups for recurrence, need for reoperation, and perioperative outcomes. Nearly 30% of patients in the Belsey and Nissen groups were male. Mean age was 68.7 years and 69.8 years, respectively. Body mass index was 30.3 kg/m2 and 28.8 kg/m2, respectively.
Ten Belsey patients (8.4%) had a hernia recurrence, as did 19 Nissen patients (16.1%). Rates of leak and reoperation were greater in Nissen fundoplication patients than in Belsey patients. There were no leaks in the Belsey patients, compared with eight leaks (6.8%) in the Nissen patients, a statistically significant difference. Reoperation was necessary in 3 Belsey patients (2.5%), significantly fewer than the 11 Nissen patients (9.3%) who underwent reoperation.
Among 77 patients in each group followed for 5 years or less, there was no difference in symptoms. However, in 41 patients in each group followed for more than 5 years, symptoms were excellent or good in 85% of Belsey patients, compared with 56% of Nissen patients.
AATS: Surgical intervention relatively safe for AAOCA in youth
It’s relatively safe to surgically treat anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery in children and adolescents, with essentially all patients cleared for full activity after 3 months, according to a study presented by Carlos M. Mery, MD.
Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) is the second leading cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young people, noted Dr. Mery of Texas Children’s Hospital.
He and his colleagues prospectively analyzed outcomes for 44 AAOCA patients who underwent surgical intervention as part of a standardized management program. The researchers included all AAOCA patients aged 2-18 years who underwent surgical intervention between December 2012 and April 2017 as part of the multidisciplinary Coronary Anomalies Program at Texas Children’s Hospital.
Surgical indications included an anomalous left coronary artery, ischemic symptoms, a positive nuclear perfusion test (NPT), or high-risk anatomy such as long intramural segment or ostial stenosis identified via CT angiography. Median patient age was 14 years.
Nine of the patients (20%) underwent surgery for an anomalous left coronary artery, with 32 patients (80%) receiving surgical intervention for an anomalous right coronary artery. A total of 34 surgical procedures (77%) were unroofing of intramural segments, 7 were coronary translocations (16%), and 2 were ostioplasties (4%).
There were no operative deaths. One patient required coronary artery bypass grafting after developing ischemia following a coronary translocation. Minor complications were seen in eight other patients (18%). One patient presented with a second episode of aborted sudden cardiac death 1 year after unroofing of an anomalous left coronary artery with a short intramural segment, and underwent successful coronary translocation and unroofing of a previously identified myocardial bridge.
At follow-up (median 2 years), 40 patients were asymptomatic (91%), while 4 patients had nonspecific chest pain (9%). Forty-one patients (93%) had returned to full activity, while 3 patients were waiting for their 3-month clearance to return to full activity.
Lobectomy can be done safely after concurrent chemotherapy and high-dose radiation in patients with resectable N2-positive stage IIIA non–small-cell lung cancer, according to study findings presented by Jessica S. Donington, MD.
Dr. Donington, of New York University, and her colleagues analyzed two prospective trials conducted by NRG Oncology, RTOG 0229 and RTOG 0839. Both trials’ primary endpoint was mediastinal node sterilization after concurrent chemotherapy and full-dose radiation and has been previously reported.
Dr. Donington and her fellow investigators specifically examined short-term surgical outcomes, given the significant controversy regarding the safety of resection after full-dose thoracic radiation.
In both trials, patients received weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel. Those in the 0229 trial underwent 61.2 Gy of radiation in 34 fractions, while patients in the 0839 trial underwent 60 Gy in 30 fractions. In addition, patients in the 0839 trial were randomized 2:1 to receive weekly panitumumab, an EGFR monoclonal antibody, with their induction therapy.
Surgical expertise was considered essential to this treatment strategy. Therefore, all surgeons were certified by RTOG prior to enrolling patients, and all patients were surgically evaluated before beginning induction therapy to determine resectability and appropriateness for trimodality therapy.
Of 125 eligible patients enrolled in the two trials, 93 patients (74%) underwent anatomic resection. A total of 77 patients underwent lobectomy, 8 underwent pneumonectomy, 6 underwent bilobectomy, and 2 patients had sleeve lobectomy. Medical contraindication and persistent nodal disease found during post-induction invasive staging were the most common reasons patients didn’t undergo resection.
Eighty-five of the 93 surgical patients had R0 resections (91%). Surgeons attempted 14 minimally invasive resections (15%), 2 of which uneventfully converted to open resection.
Just over one-quarter (28%) of patients suffered greater than Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) related to surgery, the majority of which were pulmonary in nature. The 30-day mortality rate was 4%, and all four deaths were linked to pulmonary AEs, including acute respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopleural fistula, pulmonary artery hemorrhage, and respiratory failure. Multivariable analysis for mortality identified the addition of panitumumab and use of an extended resection to be associated with an increased risk for operative mortality.
In the patients undergoing lobectomy, rates for greater than Grade 3 AEs and 30-day mortality were 26%, and 1.3%, respectively. Those rates are similar to rates reported for lobectomy without induction therapy in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and the STS General Thoracic Surgery Database over the same time period.
These two RTOG trials are the first to prospectively demonstrate that trimodality therapy with full-dose neoadjuvant radiation therapy is safe in a multi-institutional setting, Dr. Donington said.
Presentations of the latest research in cardiothoracic surgery are the hallmark of the AATS Plenary session and this year’s session did not disappoint.
When repairing large paraesophageal hernias, transthoracic Belsey Mark IV fundoplication led to lower rates of leaks and reoperations than did the widely used laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, according to a study presented by Danuel Laan, MD.
Dr. Laan, a resident at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and his colleagues compared outcomes after Belsey Mark IV fundoplication with those after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.
The researchers performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on all Mayo patients from 2002 to 2011 who underwent repair of a large paraesophageal hernia, defined as having more than 50% of the stomach within the chest. The analysis excluded patients who had already undergone a fundoplication.
Matching 118 Belsey fundoplication patients 1:1 with 118 Nissen fundoplication patients, the investigators compared the two groups for recurrence, need for reoperation, and perioperative outcomes. Nearly 30% of patients in the Belsey and Nissen groups were male. Mean age was 68.7 years and 69.8 years, respectively. Body mass index was 30.3 kg/m2 and 28.8 kg/m2, respectively.
Ten Belsey patients (8.4%) had a hernia recurrence, as did 19 Nissen patients (16.1%). Rates of leak and reoperation were greater in Nissen fundoplication patients than in Belsey patients. There were no leaks in the Belsey patients, compared with eight leaks (6.8%) in the Nissen patients, a statistically significant difference. Reoperation was necessary in 3 Belsey patients (2.5%), significantly fewer than the 11 Nissen patients (9.3%) who underwent reoperation.
Among 77 patients in each group followed for 5 years or less, there was no difference in symptoms. However, in 41 patients in each group followed for more than 5 years, symptoms were excellent or good in 85% of Belsey patients, compared with 56% of Nissen patients.
AATS: Surgical intervention relatively safe for AAOCA in youth
It’s relatively safe to surgically treat anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery in children and adolescents, with essentially all patients cleared for full activity after 3 months, according to a study presented by Carlos M. Mery, MD.
Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) is the second leading cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young people, noted Dr. Mery of Texas Children’s Hospital.
He and his colleagues prospectively analyzed outcomes for 44 AAOCA patients who underwent surgical intervention as part of a standardized management program. The researchers included all AAOCA patients aged 2-18 years who underwent surgical intervention between December 2012 and April 2017 as part of the multidisciplinary Coronary Anomalies Program at Texas Children’s Hospital.
Surgical indications included an anomalous left coronary artery, ischemic symptoms, a positive nuclear perfusion test (NPT), or high-risk anatomy such as long intramural segment or ostial stenosis identified via CT angiography. Median patient age was 14 years.
Nine of the patients (20%) underwent surgery for an anomalous left coronary artery, with 32 patients (80%) receiving surgical intervention for an anomalous right coronary artery. A total of 34 surgical procedures (77%) were unroofing of intramural segments, 7 were coronary translocations (16%), and 2 were ostioplasties (4%).
There were no operative deaths. One patient required coronary artery bypass grafting after developing ischemia following a coronary translocation. Minor complications were seen in eight other patients (18%). One patient presented with a second episode of aborted sudden cardiac death 1 year after unroofing of an anomalous left coronary artery with a short intramural segment, and underwent successful coronary translocation and unroofing of a previously identified myocardial bridge.
At follow-up (median 2 years), 40 patients were asymptomatic (91%), while 4 patients had nonspecific chest pain (9%). Forty-one patients (93%) had returned to full activity, while 3 patients were waiting for their 3-month clearance to return to full activity.
Lobectomy can be done safely after concurrent chemotherapy and high-dose radiation in patients with resectable N2-positive stage IIIA non–small-cell lung cancer, according to study findings presented by Jessica S. Donington, MD.
Dr. Donington, of New York University, and her colleagues analyzed two prospective trials conducted by NRG Oncology, RTOG 0229 and RTOG 0839. Both trials’ primary endpoint was mediastinal node sterilization after concurrent chemotherapy and full-dose radiation and has been previously reported.
Dr. Donington and her fellow investigators specifically examined short-term surgical outcomes, given the significant controversy regarding the safety of resection after full-dose thoracic radiation.
In both trials, patients received weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel. Those in the 0229 trial underwent 61.2 Gy of radiation in 34 fractions, while patients in the 0839 trial underwent 60 Gy in 30 fractions. In addition, patients in the 0839 trial were randomized 2:1 to receive weekly panitumumab, an EGFR monoclonal antibody, with their induction therapy.
Surgical expertise was considered essential to this treatment strategy. Therefore, all surgeons were certified by RTOG prior to enrolling patients, and all patients were surgically evaluated before beginning induction therapy to determine resectability and appropriateness for trimodality therapy.
Of 125 eligible patients enrolled in the two trials, 93 patients (74%) underwent anatomic resection. A total of 77 patients underwent lobectomy, 8 underwent pneumonectomy, 6 underwent bilobectomy, and 2 patients had sleeve lobectomy. Medical contraindication and persistent nodal disease found during post-induction invasive staging were the most common reasons patients didn’t undergo resection.
Eighty-five of the 93 surgical patients had R0 resections (91%). Surgeons attempted 14 minimally invasive resections (15%), 2 of which uneventfully converted to open resection.
Just over one-quarter (28%) of patients suffered greater than Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) related to surgery, the majority of which were pulmonary in nature. The 30-day mortality rate was 4%, and all four deaths were linked to pulmonary AEs, including acute respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopleural fistula, pulmonary artery hemorrhage, and respiratory failure. Multivariable analysis for mortality identified the addition of panitumumab and use of an extended resection to be associated with an increased risk for operative mortality.
In the patients undergoing lobectomy, rates for greater than Grade 3 AEs and 30-day mortality were 26%, and 1.3%, respectively. Those rates are similar to rates reported for lobectomy without induction therapy in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and the STS General Thoracic Surgery Database over the same time period.
These two RTOG trials are the first to prospectively demonstrate that trimodality therapy with full-dose neoadjuvant radiation therapy is safe in a multi-institutional setting, Dr. Donington said.
Presentations of the latest research in cardiothoracic surgery are the hallmark of the AATS Plenary session and this year’s session did not disappoint.
When repairing large paraesophageal hernias, transthoracic Belsey Mark IV fundoplication led to lower rates of leaks and reoperations than did the widely used laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, according to a study presented by Danuel Laan, MD.
Dr. Laan, a resident at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and his colleagues compared outcomes after Belsey Mark IV fundoplication with those after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.
The researchers performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on all Mayo patients from 2002 to 2011 who underwent repair of a large paraesophageal hernia, defined as having more than 50% of the stomach within the chest. The analysis excluded patients who had already undergone a fundoplication.
Matching 118 Belsey fundoplication patients 1:1 with 118 Nissen fundoplication patients, the investigators compared the two groups for recurrence, need for reoperation, and perioperative outcomes. Nearly 30% of patients in the Belsey and Nissen groups were male. Mean age was 68.7 years and 69.8 years, respectively. Body mass index was 30.3 kg/m2 and 28.8 kg/m2, respectively.
Ten Belsey patients (8.4%) had a hernia recurrence, as did 19 Nissen patients (16.1%). Rates of leak and reoperation were greater in Nissen fundoplication patients than in Belsey patients. There were no leaks in the Belsey patients, compared with eight leaks (6.8%) in the Nissen patients, a statistically significant difference. Reoperation was necessary in 3 Belsey patients (2.5%), significantly fewer than the 11 Nissen patients (9.3%) who underwent reoperation.
Among 77 patients in each group followed for 5 years or less, there was no difference in symptoms. However, in 41 patients in each group followed for more than 5 years, symptoms were excellent or good in 85% of Belsey patients, compared with 56% of Nissen patients.
AATS: Surgical intervention relatively safe for AAOCA in youth
It’s relatively safe to surgically treat anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery in children and adolescents, with essentially all patients cleared for full activity after 3 months, according to a study presented by Carlos M. Mery, MD.
Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) is the second leading cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young people, noted Dr. Mery of Texas Children’s Hospital.
He and his colleagues prospectively analyzed outcomes for 44 AAOCA patients who underwent surgical intervention as part of a standardized management program. The researchers included all AAOCA patients aged 2-18 years who underwent surgical intervention between December 2012 and April 2017 as part of the multidisciplinary Coronary Anomalies Program at Texas Children’s Hospital.
Surgical indications included an anomalous left coronary artery, ischemic symptoms, a positive nuclear perfusion test (NPT), or high-risk anatomy such as long intramural segment or ostial stenosis identified via CT angiography. Median patient age was 14 years.
Nine of the patients (20%) underwent surgery for an anomalous left coronary artery, with 32 patients (80%) receiving surgical intervention for an anomalous right coronary artery. A total of 34 surgical procedures (77%) were unroofing of intramural segments, 7 were coronary translocations (16%), and 2 were ostioplasties (4%).
There were no operative deaths. One patient required coronary artery bypass grafting after developing ischemia following a coronary translocation. Minor complications were seen in eight other patients (18%). One patient presented with a second episode of aborted sudden cardiac death 1 year after unroofing of an anomalous left coronary artery with a short intramural segment, and underwent successful coronary translocation and unroofing of a previously identified myocardial bridge.
At follow-up (median 2 years), 40 patients were asymptomatic (91%), while 4 patients had nonspecific chest pain (9%). Forty-one patients (93%) had returned to full activity, while 3 patients were waiting for their 3-month clearance to return to full activity.
Lobectomy can be done safely after concurrent chemotherapy and high-dose radiation in patients with resectable N2-positive stage IIIA non–small-cell lung cancer, according to study findings presented by Jessica S. Donington, MD.
Dr. Donington, of New York University, and her colleagues analyzed two prospective trials conducted by NRG Oncology, RTOG 0229 and RTOG 0839. Both trials’ primary endpoint was mediastinal node sterilization after concurrent chemotherapy and full-dose radiation and has been previously reported.
Dr. Donington and her fellow investigators specifically examined short-term surgical outcomes, given the significant controversy regarding the safety of resection after full-dose thoracic radiation.
In both trials, patients received weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel. Those in the 0229 trial underwent 61.2 Gy of radiation in 34 fractions, while patients in the 0839 trial underwent 60 Gy in 30 fractions. In addition, patients in the 0839 trial were randomized 2:1 to receive weekly panitumumab, an EGFR monoclonal antibody, with their induction therapy.
Surgical expertise was considered essential to this treatment strategy. Therefore, all surgeons were certified by RTOG prior to enrolling patients, and all patients were surgically evaluated before beginning induction therapy to determine resectability and appropriateness for trimodality therapy.
Of 125 eligible patients enrolled in the two trials, 93 patients (74%) underwent anatomic resection. A total of 77 patients underwent lobectomy, 8 underwent pneumonectomy, 6 underwent bilobectomy, and 2 patients had sleeve lobectomy. Medical contraindication and persistent nodal disease found during post-induction invasive staging were the most common reasons patients didn’t undergo resection.
Eighty-five of the 93 surgical patients had R0 resections (91%). Surgeons attempted 14 minimally invasive resections (15%), 2 of which uneventfully converted to open resection.
Just over one-quarter (28%) of patients suffered greater than Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) related to surgery, the majority of which were pulmonary in nature. The 30-day mortality rate was 4%, and all four deaths were linked to pulmonary AEs, including acute respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopleural fistula, pulmonary artery hemorrhage, and respiratory failure. Multivariable analysis for mortality identified the addition of panitumumab and use of an extended resection to be associated with an increased risk for operative mortality.
In the patients undergoing lobectomy, rates for greater than Grade 3 AEs and 30-day mortality were 26%, and 1.3%, respectively. Those rates are similar to rates reported for lobectomy without induction therapy in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and the STS General Thoracic Surgery Database over the same time period.
These two RTOG trials are the first to prospectively demonstrate that trimodality therapy with full-dose neoadjuvant radiation therapy is safe in a multi-institutional setting, Dr. Donington said.
Presidential address focused on learning and teams
Thoralf M. Sundt III, MD, titled his AATS Presidential Address, “Ancora Imparo: Always Learning,” to emphasize the fact that learning is at the core of team development and of dealing with a complex world.
The world once seemed simple, deterministic – a Newtonian world of individual performance, he said. But in fact, it is a complex, unpredictable world, where the solutions of a previous generation of leaders that relied on individual knowledge and authority no longer apply.
“Complex is not the same as complicated,” said Dr. Sundt. “A watch is complicated, but it is entirely predictable. Complexity is different.” Complex systems are composed of many diverse autonomous parts. They are independent, they are linked as a system, and most important – they adapt. They change in response to the environment and to their own component parts.
How they change depends critically on the nature of the interactions among those components, allowing them to demonstrate emergent properties. And they are unpredictable too, said Dr. Sundt.
This unpredictability poses problems, he added, pointing to the inevitability of systems failures in truly complex endeavors from nuclear power to petrochemical plants.
“The implication of this is that we must think beyond error prevention because we simply cannot prevent them all,” said Dr. Sundt. “That is why checklists alone will not solve our problems.” The focus, instead, he suggested, needs to be on “error management” in order to include detection and recovery.
This is all relevant to surgeons because “our world, our patients, the procedures we perform, and the institutions in which we performed them – are increasingly complex.” Therefore, “no matter how much we care, and no matter how much we try, accidents, mistakes and mishaps will occur – individual effort is not enough.”
But complexity is only half the problem, he said. “The other half is us.”
Dr. Sundt discussed two ways of thinking – fast and slow – with fast thinking grabbing on to patterns and making quick, seemingly intuitive decisions, such as those made by “experts,” and the slow following a deliberative and logical path.
Both types of thinking have their benefits and lacks, which points to how important it is to have access to each type in order to maximize success. Thus, he pointed out, there must be a focus on teams and on a diversity of views, because diversity increases the chances of finding the best good solution.
So diversity is necessary, but is it sufficient? Two other things are necessary, according to Dr. Sundt.
The first is synergy, which is the difference between another useless administrative meeting and an exciting, generative one during which everyone shares opinions, changes their views a bit, and collectively comes up with an entirely original idea.
“But the key to transforming a workgroup to a high-performing team is learning,” he said. “It is an active process that requires both cognitive, and - unfortunately for us task-oriented personalities – affective skills. The aim is to create a ‘learning organization’ – a culture that encourages learning through open interactions in a psychologically safe space.
“It is entirely within our power to change the nature of the interactions we have within our teams, and we can do it today. No hospital committee or departmental approval is required. You cannot solve all of the problems, but you do have an enormous impact on those individuals around you.”
As the leader of a team, “everyone is watching you.” he added.
Dr. Sundt concluded by pointing out that it is also extremely important to confront inevitable failure as a learning experience. “You must wring every drop of learning out of it,” he counseled. And ultimately, “trust your team - you need them. The patient needs them,” he concluded.
Thoralf M. Sundt III, MD, titled his AATS Presidential Address, “Ancora Imparo: Always Learning,” to emphasize the fact that learning is at the core of team development and of dealing with a complex world.
The world once seemed simple, deterministic – a Newtonian world of individual performance, he said. But in fact, it is a complex, unpredictable world, where the solutions of a previous generation of leaders that relied on individual knowledge and authority no longer apply.
“Complex is not the same as complicated,” said Dr. Sundt. “A watch is complicated, but it is entirely predictable. Complexity is different.” Complex systems are composed of many diverse autonomous parts. They are independent, they are linked as a system, and most important – they adapt. They change in response to the environment and to their own component parts.
How they change depends critically on the nature of the interactions among those components, allowing them to demonstrate emergent properties. And they are unpredictable too, said Dr. Sundt.
This unpredictability poses problems, he added, pointing to the inevitability of systems failures in truly complex endeavors from nuclear power to petrochemical plants.
“The implication of this is that we must think beyond error prevention because we simply cannot prevent them all,” said Dr. Sundt. “That is why checklists alone will not solve our problems.” The focus, instead, he suggested, needs to be on “error management” in order to include detection and recovery.
This is all relevant to surgeons because “our world, our patients, the procedures we perform, and the institutions in which we performed them – are increasingly complex.” Therefore, “no matter how much we care, and no matter how much we try, accidents, mistakes and mishaps will occur – individual effort is not enough.”
But complexity is only half the problem, he said. “The other half is us.”
Dr. Sundt discussed two ways of thinking – fast and slow – with fast thinking grabbing on to patterns and making quick, seemingly intuitive decisions, such as those made by “experts,” and the slow following a deliberative and logical path.
Both types of thinking have their benefits and lacks, which points to how important it is to have access to each type in order to maximize success. Thus, he pointed out, there must be a focus on teams and on a diversity of views, because diversity increases the chances of finding the best good solution.
So diversity is necessary, but is it sufficient? Two other things are necessary, according to Dr. Sundt.
The first is synergy, which is the difference between another useless administrative meeting and an exciting, generative one during which everyone shares opinions, changes their views a bit, and collectively comes up with an entirely original idea.
“But the key to transforming a workgroup to a high-performing team is learning,” he said. “It is an active process that requires both cognitive, and - unfortunately for us task-oriented personalities – affective skills. The aim is to create a ‘learning organization’ – a culture that encourages learning through open interactions in a psychologically safe space.
“It is entirely within our power to change the nature of the interactions we have within our teams, and we can do it today. No hospital committee or departmental approval is required. You cannot solve all of the problems, but you do have an enormous impact on those individuals around you.”
As the leader of a team, “everyone is watching you.” he added.
Dr. Sundt concluded by pointing out that it is also extremely important to confront inevitable failure as a learning experience. “You must wring every drop of learning out of it,” he counseled. And ultimately, “trust your team - you need them. The patient needs them,” he concluded.
Thoralf M. Sundt III, MD, titled his AATS Presidential Address, “Ancora Imparo: Always Learning,” to emphasize the fact that learning is at the core of team development and of dealing with a complex world.
The world once seemed simple, deterministic – a Newtonian world of individual performance, he said. But in fact, it is a complex, unpredictable world, where the solutions of a previous generation of leaders that relied on individual knowledge and authority no longer apply.
“Complex is not the same as complicated,” said Dr. Sundt. “A watch is complicated, but it is entirely predictable. Complexity is different.” Complex systems are composed of many diverse autonomous parts. They are independent, they are linked as a system, and most important – they adapt. They change in response to the environment and to their own component parts.
How they change depends critically on the nature of the interactions among those components, allowing them to demonstrate emergent properties. And they are unpredictable too, said Dr. Sundt.
This unpredictability poses problems, he added, pointing to the inevitability of systems failures in truly complex endeavors from nuclear power to petrochemical plants.
“The implication of this is that we must think beyond error prevention because we simply cannot prevent them all,” said Dr. Sundt. “That is why checklists alone will not solve our problems.” The focus, instead, he suggested, needs to be on “error management” in order to include detection and recovery.
This is all relevant to surgeons because “our world, our patients, the procedures we perform, and the institutions in which we performed them – are increasingly complex.” Therefore, “no matter how much we care, and no matter how much we try, accidents, mistakes and mishaps will occur – individual effort is not enough.”
But complexity is only half the problem, he said. “The other half is us.”
Dr. Sundt discussed two ways of thinking – fast and slow – with fast thinking grabbing on to patterns and making quick, seemingly intuitive decisions, such as those made by “experts,” and the slow following a deliberative and logical path.
Both types of thinking have their benefits and lacks, which points to how important it is to have access to each type in order to maximize success. Thus, he pointed out, there must be a focus on teams and on a diversity of views, because diversity increases the chances of finding the best good solution.
So diversity is necessary, but is it sufficient? Two other things are necessary, according to Dr. Sundt.
The first is synergy, which is the difference between another useless administrative meeting and an exciting, generative one during which everyone shares opinions, changes their views a bit, and collectively comes up with an entirely original idea.
“But the key to transforming a workgroup to a high-performing team is learning,” he said. “It is an active process that requires both cognitive, and - unfortunately for us task-oriented personalities – affective skills. The aim is to create a ‘learning organization’ – a culture that encourages learning through open interactions in a psychologically safe space.
“It is entirely within our power to change the nature of the interactions we have within our teams, and we can do it today. No hospital committee or departmental approval is required. You cannot solve all of the problems, but you do have an enormous impact on those individuals around you.”
As the leader of a team, “everyone is watching you.” he added.
Dr. Sundt concluded by pointing out that it is also extremely important to confront inevitable failure as a learning experience. “You must wring every drop of learning out of it,” he counseled. And ultimately, “trust your team - you need them. The patient needs them,” he concluded.
AATS Mitral Conclave Draws the Largest Crowd Ever
The fourth biennial the American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) Mitral Conclave 2017 was attended by a large audience of cardiothoracic surgeons and other professionals from 67 countries on Thursday and Friday to hear the latest on repair and replacement of the mitral valve.
Conference chair David H. Adams, MD, of Mount Sinai Health System noted that this was the first time the AATS had directly managed the meeting. The conclave included more than 200 oral presentations and 207 e-posters.
“What a great way to start off AATS week,” said AATS President Thoralf M. Sundt III, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital in his opening remarks. The meeting fits well with the AATS Week theme of “always learning,” Dr. Sundt said. “And I think that is what is spectacular about this meeting; it demonstrates the desire and the drive to learn,” he said. He also said the Mitral Conclave was a “tribute” to Dr. Adams’ energy and creativity as the meeting founder.
The faculty included more than 70 international thought leaders in mitral valve repair, and the live sessions featured more than 200 lectures, abstracts, and video presentations. Twenty-two breakout sessions reported on more than 80 submitted abstracts.
Among the breakouts was a mini-oral session on minimal access surgery, in which international leaders shared pearls on integrating minimally invasive surgery in the cardiothoracic practice. Frequency and repetition are key to improving minimally invasive surgical skills, Jean-Francois Obadia, MD, of Lyon, France, emphasized. “If you want to be involved in minimally invasive surgery, you need to do at least one or two a week,” he said.
Mastering videography skills also improves one’s minimally invasive skills, said Vinay Badhwar, MD, of West Virginia University. “To do mitral surgery robotically and do minimally invasive surgery, you have to become a videographer,” he said. The surgeon must also be engaged in carefully selecting his or her team, Dr. Badhwar added.
In another breakout, investigators provided updates on eight different transcatheter mitral valve trials: Tendyne (Tendyne); Intrepid (Medtronic); CardiAQ (Edwards Lifesciences); Harpoon (Harpoon Medical); NeoChord (NeoChord); Cardioband (Valtech); and Trialign (Mitralign).
In seven different plenary sessions, international experts participated in panels that discussed management of complications and explored scenarios in which they would not intervene. A debate format modeled on the movie Thunderdome—“four men enter, one man leaves”—featured a spirited discussion on when to repair functional tricuspid regurgitation. Dr. Adams and Tirone E. David, MD, of Toronto General Hospital, took rather strident opposing views, with Dr. Adams advocating for repair. The goal, Dr. Adams said, is to provide normal tricuspid valve function for the long term. “We got aggressive because we were doing a lot of reoperations for tricuspid disease in patients who had mitral valve surgery,” Dr. Adams said.
One plenary roundtable tackled the subject of when to use mechanical valves instead of biological valves. “Has the pendulum swung too far away from mechanical valves and are there cases where mechanical valves should be the first choice?” Dr. Sundt, session chair, asked the panelists.
The panelists concurred that a patient’s individual needs would drive decision-making. Anelechi Anyanwu, MD, of Mount Sinai, said he’d be inclined to use a mechanical valve in a 25-year-old man with rheumatic mitral stenosis.* In younger patients, namely teenagers, valve selection depends on the activity level they’d pursue after surgery, said Pedro J. del Nido, MD, of Children’s Hospital Boston.
At the plenary on transcatheter mitral therapy, John Laschinger, MD, of the Food and Drug Administration, reviewed the approval process for new mitral devices. “It comes down to the benefit-risk determination where we look at the standard-of-care surgery and look to see if the device is an acceptable alternative – that is, if it is safer and more effective,” Dr. Laschinger said.
James S. Gammie, MD, of the University of Maryland, also reported on an analysis of 87,214 mitral procedures from the Society for Thoracic Surgeons database over the past 5 years. Among the revelations from this analysis are that 96.1% of procedures for leaflet prolapse involved annuloplasty and that 75.8% receive a bioprosthetic valve.
The plenary and breakouts also included seven different video sessions ranging from managing leaflet prolapse to adult congenital surgery and complex scenarios.
Robert A. Dion, MD, Genk, Belgium, delivered the Conclave Honored Lecture and received the Mitral Conclave Achievement Award. He talked about the operative team as a geese flight. “The geese flight is always a unit of hierarchy,” Dr. Dion said. “The figure of the geese flight is V and the chief chooses the lead goose for the capacity to fly high enough and fast enough.”
In the Honored Cardiology Lecture, Robert O. Bonow, MD, of Northwestern Memorial Hospital, explored clinical guidelines for mitral valve repair and replacement and their application in the clinic. “Both sets of guidelines in Europe and the United States make the clear point that is obvious to all of you but less so to cardiologists, that there are two forms of mitral valve disease: degenerative or primary, and functional, which is secondary,” he said. He called for thoracic surgeons to collaborate with their cardiology colleagues. “You and I have lots of work to do, not only in caring for our patients but also in starting to devise appropriate quality metrics, hopefully working together in a team-based approach,” Dr. Bonow said. “This is what gives the best patient care but also gives us the best recommendations for our policy issues. And I look forward to further enhancements from your field and mine as well.”
The AATS Mitral Conclave skips a year in 2018. Instead, New York will host the biennial AATS Aortic Symposium April 26–28 next year.
* CORRECTION: Dr. Anyanwu's remarks were corrected read "he’d be inclined to use a mechanical valve in a 25-year-old man with rheumatic mitral stenosis." 5/5/2017
The fourth biennial the American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) Mitral Conclave 2017 was attended by a large audience of cardiothoracic surgeons and other professionals from 67 countries on Thursday and Friday to hear the latest on repair and replacement of the mitral valve.
Conference chair David H. Adams, MD, of Mount Sinai Health System noted that this was the first time the AATS had directly managed the meeting. The conclave included more than 200 oral presentations and 207 e-posters.
“What a great way to start off AATS week,” said AATS President Thoralf M. Sundt III, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital in his opening remarks. The meeting fits well with the AATS Week theme of “always learning,” Dr. Sundt said. “And I think that is what is spectacular about this meeting; it demonstrates the desire and the drive to learn,” he said. He also said the Mitral Conclave was a “tribute” to Dr. Adams’ energy and creativity as the meeting founder.
The faculty included more than 70 international thought leaders in mitral valve repair, and the live sessions featured more than 200 lectures, abstracts, and video presentations. Twenty-two breakout sessions reported on more than 80 submitted abstracts.
Among the breakouts was a mini-oral session on minimal access surgery, in which international leaders shared pearls on integrating minimally invasive surgery in the cardiothoracic practice. Frequency and repetition are key to improving minimally invasive surgical skills, Jean-Francois Obadia, MD, of Lyon, France, emphasized. “If you want to be involved in minimally invasive surgery, you need to do at least one or two a week,” he said.
Mastering videography skills also improves one’s minimally invasive skills, said Vinay Badhwar, MD, of West Virginia University. “To do mitral surgery robotically and do minimally invasive surgery, you have to become a videographer,” he said. The surgeon must also be engaged in carefully selecting his or her team, Dr. Badhwar added.
In another breakout, investigators provided updates on eight different transcatheter mitral valve trials: Tendyne (Tendyne); Intrepid (Medtronic); CardiAQ (Edwards Lifesciences); Harpoon (Harpoon Medical); NeoChord (NeoChord); Cardioband (Valtech); and Trialign (Mitralign).
In seven different plenary sessions, international experts participated in panels that discussed management of complications and explored scenarios in which they would not intervene. A debate format modeled on the movie Thunderdome—“four men enter, one man leaves”—featured a spirited discussion on when to repair functional tricuspid regurgitation. Dr. Adams and Tirone E. David, MD, of Toronto General Hospital, took rather strident opposing views, with Dr. Adams advocating for repair. The goal, Dr. Adams said, is to provide normal tricuspid valve function for the long term. “We got aggressive because we were doing a lot of reoperations for tricuspid disease in patients who had mitral valve surgery,” Dr. Adams said.
One plenary roundtable tackled the subject of when to use mechanical valves instead of biological valves. “Has the pendulum swung too far away from mechanical valves and are there cases where mechanical valves should be the first choice?” Dr. Sundt, session chair, asked the panelists.
The panelists concurred that a patient’s individual needs would drive decision-making. Anelechi Anyanwu, MD, of Mount Sinai, said he’d be inclined to use a mechanical valve in a 25-year-old man with rheumatic mitral stenosis.* In younger patients, namely teenagers, valve selection depends on the activity level they’d pursue after surgery, said Pedro J. del Nido, MD, of Children’s Hospital Boston.
At the plenary on transcatheter mitral therapy, John Laschinger, MD, of the Food and Drug Administration, reviewed the approval process for new mitral devices. “It comes down to the benefit-risk determination where we look at the standard-of-care surgery and look to see if the device is an acceptable alternative – that is, if it is safer and more effective,” Dr. Laschinger said.
James S. Gammie, MD, of the University of Maryland, also reported on an analysis of 87,214 mitral procedures from the Society for Thoracic Surgeons database over the past 5 years. Among the revelations from this analysis are that 96.1% of procedures for leaflet prolapse involved annuloplasty and that 75.8% receive a bioprosthetic valve.
The plenary and breakouts also included seven different video sessions ranging from managing leaflet prolapse to adult congenital surgery and complex scenarios.
Robert A. Dion, MD, Genk, Belgium, delivered the Conclave Honored Lecture and received the Mitral Conclave Achievement Award. He talked about the operative team as a geese flight. “The geese flight is always a unit of hierarchy,” Dr. Dion said. “The figure of the geese flight is V and the chief chooses the lead goose for the capacity to fly high enough and fast enough.”
In the Honored Cardiology Lecture, Robert O. Bonow, MD, of Northwestern Memorial Hospital, explored clinical guidelines for mitral valve repair and replacement and their application in the clinic. “Both sets of guidelines in Europe and the United States make the clear point that is obvious to all of you but less so to cardiologists, that there are two forms of mitral valve disease: degenerative or primary, and functional, which is secondary,” he said. He called for thoracic surgeons to collaborate with their cardiology colleagues. “You and I have lots of work to do, not only in caring for our patients but also in starting to devise appropriate quality metrics, hopefully working together in a team-based approach,” Dr. Bonow said. “This is what gives the best patient care but also gives us the best recommendations for our policy issues. And I look forward to further enhancements from your field and mine as well.”
The AATS Mitral Conclave skips a year in 2018. Instead, New York will host the biennial AATS Aortic Symposium April 26–28 next year.
* CORRECTION: Dr. Anyanwu's remarks were corrected read "he’d be inclined to use a mechanical valve in a 25-year-old man with rheumatic mitral stenosis." 5/5/2017
The fourth biennial the American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) Mitral Conclave 2017 was attended by a large audience of cardiothoracic surgeons and other professionals from 67 countries on Thursday and Friday to hear the latest on repair and replacement of the mitral valve.
Conference chair David H. Adams, MD, of Mount Sinai Health System noted that this was the first time the AATS had directly managed the meeting. The conclave included more than 200 oral presentations and 207 e-posters.
“What a great way to start off AATS week,” said AATS President Thoralf M. Sundt III, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital in his opening remarks. The meeting fits well with the AATS Week theme of “always learning,” Dr. Sundt said. “And I think that is what is spectacular about this meeting; it demonstrates the desire and the drive to learn,” he said. He also said the Mitral Conclave was a “tribute” to Dr. Adams’ energy and creativity as the meeting founder.
The faculty included more than 70 international thought leaders in mitral valve repair, and the live sessions featured more than 200 lectures, abstracts, and video presentations. Twenty-two breakout sessions reported on more than 80 submitted abstracts.
Among the breakouts was a mini-oral session on minimal access surgery, in which international leaders shared pearls on integrating minimally invasive surgery in the cardiothoracic practice. Frequency and repetition are key to improving minimally invasive surgical skills, Jean-Francois Obadia, MD, of Lyon, France, emphasized. “If you want to be involved in minimally invasive surgery, you need to do at least one or two a week,” he said.
Mastering videography skills also improves one’s minimally invasive skills, said Vinay Badhwar, MD, of West Virginia University. “To do mitral surgery robotically and do minimally invasive surgery, you have to become a videographer,” he said. The surgeon must also be engaged in carefully selecting his or her team, Dr. Badhwar added.
In another breakout, investigators provided updates on eight different transcatheter mitral valve trials: Tendyne (Tendyne); Intrepid (Medtronic); CardiAQ (Edwards Lifesciences); Harpoon (Harpoon Medical); NeoChord (NeoChord); Cardioband (Valtech); and Trialign (Mitralign).
In seven different plenary sessions, international experts participated in panels that discussed management of complications and explored scenarios in which they would not intervene. A debate format modeled on the movie Thunderdome—“four men enter, one man leaves”—featured a spirited discussion on when to repair functional tricuspid regurgitation. Dr. Adams and Tirone E. David, MD, of Toronto General Hospital, took rather strident opposing views, with Dr. Adams advocating for repair. The goal, Dr. Adams said, is to provide normal tricuspid valve function for the long term. “We got aggressive because we were doing a lot of reoperations for tricuspid disease in patients who had mitral valve surgery,” Dr. Adams said.
One plenary roundtable tackled the subject of when to use mechanical valves instead of biological valves. “Has the pendulum swung too far away from mechanical valves and are there cases where mechanical valves should be the first choice?” Dr. Sundt, session chair, asked the panelists.
The panelists concurred that a patient’s individual needs would drive decision-making. Anelechi Anyanwu, MD, of Mount Sinai, said he’d be inclined to use a mechanical valve in a 25-year-old man with rheumatic mitral stenosis.* In younger patients, namely teenagers, valve selection depends on the activity level they’d pursue after surgery, said Pedro J. del Nido, MD, of Children’s Hospital Boston.
At the plenary on transcatheter mitral therapy, John Laschinger, MD, of the Food and Drug Administration, reviewed the approval process for new mitral devices. “It comes down to the benefit-risk determination where we look at the standard-of-care surgery and look to see if the device is an acceptable alternative – that is, if it is safer and more effective,” Dr. Laschinger said.
James S. Gammie, MD, of the University of Maryland, also reported on an analysis of 87,214 mitral procedures from the Society for Thoracic Surgeons database over the past 5 years. Among the revelations from this analysis are that 96.1% of procedures for leaflet prolapse involved annuloplasty and that 75.8% receive a bioprosthetic valve.
The plenary and breakouts also included seven different video sessions ranging from managing leaflet prolapse to adult congenital surgery and complex scenarios.
Robert A. Dion, MD, Genk, Belgium, delivered the Conclave Honored Lecture and received the Mitral Conclave Achievement Award. He talked about the operative team as a geese flight. “The geese flight is always a unit of hierarchy,” Dr. Dion said. “The figure of the geese flight is V and the chief chooses the lead goose for the capacity to fly high enough and fast enough.”
In the Honored Cardiology Lecture, Robert O. Bonow, MD, of Northwestern Memorial Hospital, explored clinical guidelines for mitral valve repair and replacement and their application in the clinic. “Both sets of guidelines in Europe and the United States make the clear point that is obvious to all of you but less so to cardiologists, that there are two forms of mitral valve disease: degenerative or primary, and functional, which is secondary,” he said. He called for thoracic surgeons to collaborate with their cardiology colleagues. “You and I have lots of work to do, not only in caring for our patients but also in starting to devise appropriate quality metrics, hopefully working together in a team-based approach,” Dr. Bonow said. “This is what gives the best patient care but also gives us the best recommendations for our policy issues. And I look forward to further enhancements from your field and mine as well.”
The AATS Mitral Conclave skips a year in 2018. Instead, New York will host the biennial AATS Aortic Symposium April 26–28 next year.
* CORRECTION: Dr. Anyanwu's remarks were corrected read "he’d be inclined to use a mechanical valve in a 25-year-old man with rheumatic mitral stenosis." 5/5/2017
Inaugural Innovation Summit Addressed CTS Creativity and Development
The first AATS Innovation Summit was launched on Saturday morning. The Summit was designed to assist cardiothoracic surgeons in developing new clinically applicable technology by giving them information on how to protect intellectual property, obtain funding, and conduct clinical trials. Attendees also got the latest updates on regulatory pathways and advice on building industry relationships needed to forge a novel product.
Pedro J. del Nido, MD, who was instrumental in coming up with the original idea for the Summit, introduced former AATS President W. Randolph Chitwood Jr., MD, who served as Program Director.
Dr. Chitwood, of East Carolina University, said that the Innovation Summit was already successful in that there were more than five times as many attendees as had been originally planned for.
“The most fun part of this meeting,” Dr. Chitwood promised, would be the Commercialization Workshop at the end of the day “where we develop a fictitious product and carry it all the way to commercialization.”
Michael J. Mack, MD, a famous innovator in his own right, opened the didactic portion of the program by outlining the Summit Challenges.
Dr. Mack, of the Baylor Health Care System, detailed what he saw as the essential steps to innovation and the direction he saw that innovation was taking.
“The whole field of cardiac surgery is moving to a catheter-based approach,” he declared.
He pointed out the tremendous growth in the invention of catheter-based products in the mitral regurgitation space. “The field is fertile with innovators,” he added.
In order to be innovative, he said, quoting what he called the Bavaria Rules, after Joseph E. Bavaria, MD, “You’ve got to have a vision; you’ve got to have a strategy; you need the tactics to implement that strategy, and at the end of the day, you have to execute that strategy.”
He concluded his talk saying, “Our field has a legacy of innovation. Our challenge is to adopt the tools to move that innovation field forward that our specialty has always been known for.”
In his morning keynote address, James L. Cox, MD, of Washington University, spoke on “Surgeon Innovators and the Innovation Imperative.”
He listed some of the major innovations in the cardiac space over the past 60+ years, from the beginning of aortic surgery, to mitral valve surgery, the Maze procedure, and even TAVR, pointing out that historically at least 10-20 years has been the lag time between the development of the innovation and its more-or-less widespread adoption, following the so-called S-curve.
The next stage of innovation is not starting from scratch, he said, but rather the recognition that the previous innovation can be improved upon, and the beginning of a new innovation S-curve at the peak of the old, a process of continual development and refinement.
Dr. Cox stressed that for innovation to be adopted, it couldn’t be overly complex, citing the Maze procedure for atrial fibrillation, which was highly superior to the alternatives for treating AF, but has still lagged behind pulmonary vein isolation, a much less effective, but much easier technique used by interventional cardiologists.
He showed data demonstrating that when it came to innovative techniques, cure rate effectively did not matter to adoption, compared to the level of complexity of the new procedure.
He added that it was important for any new innovation to not “get too far away” from nature and its lessons, and that it should not be too complex to be routinely trained for and adopted.
Dr. Cox concluded with an admonition to new innovators to “listen to what your peers say. They have ideas, experiences, and imaginations of their own.”
He added that “they may or may not have anything to say that will change your course, but you have to listen to them.”
The first AATS Innovation Summit was launched on Saturday morning. The Summit was designed to assist cardiothoracic surgeons in developing new clinically applicable technology by giving them information on how to protect intellectual property, obtain funding, and conduct clinical trials. Attendees also got the latest updates on regulatory pathways and advice on building industry relationships needed to forge a novel product.
Pedro J. del Nido, MD, who was instrumental in coming up with the original idea for the Summit, introduced former AATS President W. Randolph Chitwood Jr., MD, who served as Program Director.
Dr. Chitwood, of East Carolina University, said that the Innovation Summit was already successful in that there were more than five times as many attendees as had been originally planned for.
“The most fun part of this meeting,” Dr. Chitwood promised, would be the Commercialization Workshop at the end of the day “where we develop a fictitious product and carry it all the way to commercialization.”
Michael J. Mack, MD, a famous innovator in his own right, opened the didactic portion of the program by outlining the Summit Challenges.
Dr. Mack, of the Baylor Health Care System, detailed what he saw as the essential steps to innovation and the direction he saw that innovation was taking.
“The whole field of cardiac surgery is moving to a catheter-based approach,” he declared.
He pointed out the tremendous growth in the invention of catheter-based products in the mitral regurgitation space. “The field is fertile with innovators,” he added.
In order to be innovative, he said, quoting what he called the Bavaria Rules, after Joseph E. Bavaria, MD, “You’ve got to have a vision; you’ve got to have a strategy; you need the tactics to implement that strategy, and at the end of the day, you have to execute that strategy.”
He concluded his talk saying, “Our field has a legacy of innovation. Our challenge is to adopt the tools to move that innovation field forward that our specialty has always been known for.”
In his morning keynote address, James L. Cox, MD, of Washington University, spoke on “Surgeon Innovators and the Innovation Imperative.”
He listed some of the major innovations in the cardiac space over the past 60+ years, from the beginning of aortic surgery, to mitral valve surgery, the Maze procedure, and even TAVR, pointing out that historically at least 10-20 years has been the lag time between the development of the innovation and its more-or-less widespread adoption, following the so-called S-curve.
The next stage of innovation is not starting from scratch, he said, but rather the recognition that the previous innovation can be improved upon, and the beginning of a new innovation S-curve at the peak of the old, a process of continual development and refinement.
Dr. Cox stressed that for innovation to be adopted, it couldn’t be overly complex, citing the Maze procedure for atrial fibrillation, which was highly superior to the alternatives for treating AF, but has still lagged behind pulmonary vein isolation, a much less effective, but much easier technique used by interventional cardiologists.
He showed data demonstrating that when it came to innovative techniques, cure rate effectively did not matter to adoption, compared to the level of complexity of the new procedure.
He added that it was important for any new innovation to not “get too far away” from nature and its lessons, and that it should not be too complex to be routinely trained for and adopted.
Dr. Cox concluded with an admonition to new innovators to “listen to what your peers say. They have ideas, experiences, and imaginations of their own.”
He added that “they may or may not have anything to say that will change your course, but you have to listen to them.”
The first AATS Innovation Summit was launched on Saturday morning. The Summit was designed to assist cardiothoracic surgeons in developing new clinically applicable technology by giving them information on how to protect intellectual property, obtain funding, and conduct clinical trials. Attendees also got the latest updates on regulatory pathways and advice on building industry relationships needed to forge a novel product.
Pedro J. del Nido, MD, who was instrumental in coming up with the original idea for the Summit, introduced former AATS President W. Randolph Chitwood Jr., MD, who served as Program Director.
Dr. Chitwood, of East Carolina University, said that the Innovation Summit was already successful in that there were more than five times as many attendees as had been originally planned for.
“The most fun part of this meeting,” Dr. Chitwood promised, would be the Commercialization Workshop at the end of the day “where we develop a fictitious product and carry it all the way to commercialization.”
Michael J. Mack, MD, a famous innovator in his own right, opened the didactic portion of the program by outlining the Summit Challenges.
Dr. Mack, of the Baylor Health Care System, detailed what he saw as the essential steps to innovation and the direction he saw that innovation was taking.
“The whole field of cardiac surgery is moving to a catheter-based approach,” he declared.
He pointed out the tremendous growth in the invention of catheter-based products in the mitral regurgitation space. “The field is fertile with innovators,” he added.
In order to be innovative, he said, quoting what he called the Bavaria Rules, after Joseph E. Bavaria, MD, “You’ve got to have a vision; you’ve got to have a strategy; you need the tactics to implement that strategy, and at the end of the day, you have to execute that strategy.”
He concluded his talk saying, “Our field has a legacy of innovation. Our challenge is to adopt the tools to move that innovation field forward that our specialty has always been known for.”
In his morning keynote address, James L. Cox, MD, of Washington University, spoke on “Surgeon Innovators and the Innovation Imperative.”
He listed some of the major innovations in the cardiac space over the past 60+ years, from the beginning of aortic surgery, to mitral valve surgery, the Maze procedure, and even TAVR, pointing out that historically at least 10-20 years has been the lag time between the development of the innovation and its more-or-less widespread adoption, following the so-called S-curve.
The next stage of innovation is not starting from scratch, he said, but rather the recognition that the previous innovation can be improved upon, and the beginning of a new innovation S-curve at the peak of the old, a process of continual development and refinement.
Dr. Cox stressed that for innovation to be adopted, it couldn’t be overly complex, citing the Maze procedure for atrial fibrillation, which was highly superior to the alternatives for treating AF, but has still lagged behind pulmonary vein isolation, a much less effective, but much easier technique used by interventional cardiologists.
He showed data demonstrating that when it came to innovative techniques, cure rate effectively did not matter to adoption, compared to the level of complexity of the new procedure.
He added that it was important for any new innovation to not “get too far away” from nature and its lessons, and that it should not be too complex to be routinely trained for and adopted.
Dr. Cox concluded with an admonition to new innovators to “listen to what your peers say. They have ideas, experiences, and imaginations of their own.”
He added that “they may or may not have anything to say that will change your course, but you have to listen to them.”
What drives readmissions within 90 days after MI hospitalization
WASHINGTON – In a large population of Medicare patients hospitalized for acute MI, four factors stood out as predictors of increased likelihood of readmission within 90 days, Aaron D. Kugelmass, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.
These four predictors of 90-day readmission were end-stage renal disease at the time of the initial admission for MI, which in a logistic regression model was independently associated with an 88% relative increase in readmission risk; no percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the index hospitalization, which carried a 64% increase in risk; type 1 diabetes, with a 57% increased readmission rate; and heart failure at the initial hospitalization, with an associated 34% greater risk, according to Dr. Kugelmass, chief of cardiology and medical director of the heart and vascular center at Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, Mass.
This is important new information for cardiologists and hospital administrators as they gear up for Medicare’s planned introduction of an episodic bundled payment model for patients with acute MI. In the initial phase of the project, which starts in July, approximately 1,120 hospitals in 98 metropolitan areas will be required to take financial responsibility for all inpatient and outpatient costs accrued during a Medicare beneficiary’s initial hospitalization for acute MI and for 90 days post discharge. The hospitals will be paid a fixed target price for each bundled 90-day acute MI care episode. The intent is to provide incentives for hospitals, physicians, and other health care providers to improve coordination of care with a goal of improved quality at reduced cost.
“This is going to be a learning curve for everyone,” he said.
“The best way to deal with this change is to understand the factors driving costs and morbidity and mortality,” Dr. Kugelmass said, in explaining why he conducted a retrospective study of readmissions within 90 days in a population of 143,286 Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for acute MI in 2014. The study focus was on readmissions because they add so much to total cost of care for a 90-day episode.
Twenty-eight percent of patients were readmitted at least once within 90 days of discharge following their acute MI. The Medicare bundled payment plan divides MI patients into two separate groups: those who undergo PCI during their initial hospitalization and those who receive medical management only. Thirty-one percent of the readmitted patients in Dr. Kugelmass’s study had undergone PCI during their index hospitalization, while the other 69% were managed medically.
Heart failure was the No. 1 reason for readmission within 90 days in patients who had PCI during the index hospitalization. It was the primary reason for 17.6% of readmissions. Next came recurrent angina or chest pain, which accounted for 6.6% of readmissions; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or pneumonia, 6.3%; and GI bleeding with hemorrhage, which was the primary reason for 6.0% of readmissions. Together these four causes accounted for more than 36% of all readmissions in the PCI group.
“The GI bleeding data were really interesting,” the cardiologist said. “There’s a lot of talk now about reducing the duration of dual-antiplatelet therapy [DAPT] after PCI. This is an administrative data set that’s quite large, and it shows that GI bleeding in a post-PCI group early in the duration of DAPT is in fact a significant cause of readmission and poses significant hazard.”
Among patients who were medically managed during their index hospitalization, the top four reasons for readmission were heart failure, accounting for 20.6% of readmissions; cardiac surgery, 13.5%; sepsis, 7.8%; and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/pneumonia, 6.3%. GI bleeding wasn’t a significant cause of readmission in this group.
“I think what we need to do next is dive deeper into the medically managed group. There is a cohort in there that’s incredibly sick and are likely to drive costs and be prone to readmission. And there’s another component of the medically managed group that had to be fairly healthy because they were able to undergo coronary artery bypass surgery within 90 days,” Dr. Kugelmass said.
He reported having no financial conflicts regarding his study.
WASHINGTON – In a large population of Medicare patients hospitalized for acute MI, four factors stood out as predictors of increased likelihood of readmission within 90 days, Aaron D. Kugelmass, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.
These four predictors of 90-day readmission were end-stage renal disease at the time of the initial admission for MI, which in a logistic regression model was independently associated with an 88% relative increase in readmission risk; no percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the index hospitalization, which carried a 64% increase in risk; type 1 diabetes, with a 57% increased readmission rate; and heart failure at the initial hospitalization, with an associated 34% greater risk, according to Dr. Kugelmass, chief of cardiology and medical director of the heart and vascular center at Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, Mass.
This is important new information for cardiologists and hospital administrators as they gear up for Medicare’s planned introduction of an episodic bundled payment model for patients with acute MI. In the initial phase of the project, which starts in July, approximately 1,120 hospitals in 98 metropolitan areas will be required to take financial responsibility for all inpatient and outpatient costs accrued during a Medicare beneficiary’s initial hospitalization for acute MI and for 90 days post discharge. The hospitals will be paid a fixed target price for each bundled 90-day acute MI care episode. The intent is to provide incentives for hospitals, physicians, and other health care providers to improve coordination of care with a goal of improved quality at reduced cost.
“This is going to be a learning curve for everyone,” he said.
“The best way to deal with this change is to understand the factors driving costs and morbidity and mortality,” Dr. Kugelmass said, in explaining why he conducted a retrospective study of readmissions within 90 days in a population of 143,286 Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for acute MI in 2014. The study focus was on readmissions because they add so much to total cost of care for a 90-day episode.
Twenty-eight percent of patients were readmitted at least once within 90 days of discharge following their acute MI. The Medicare bundled payment plan divides MI patients into two separate groups: those who undergo PCI during their initial hospitalization and those who receive medical management only. Thirty-one percent of the readmitted patients in Dr. Kugelmass’s study had undergone PCI during their index hospitalization, while the other 69% were managed medically.
Heart failure was the No. 1 reason for readmission within 90 days in patients who had PCI during the index hospitalization. It was the primary reason for 17.6% of readmissions. Next came recurrent angina or chest pain, which accounted for 6.6% of readmissions; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or pneumonia, 6.3%; and GI bleeding with hemorrhage, which was the primary reason for 6.0% of readmissions. Together these four causes accounted for more than 36% of all readmissions in the PCI group.
“The GI bleeding data were really interesting,” the cardiologist said. “There’s a lot of talk now about reducing the duration of dual-antiplatelet therapy [DAPT] after PCI. This is an administrative data set that’s quite large, and it shows that GI bleeding in a post-PCI group early in the duration of DAPT is in fact a significant cause of readmission and poses significant hazard.”
Among patients who were medically managed during their index hospitalization, the top four reasons for readmission were heart failure, accounting for 20.6% of readmissions; cardiac surgery, 13.5%; sepsis, 7.8%; and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/pneumonia, 6.3%. GI bleeding wasn’t a significant cause of readmission in this group.
“I think what we need to do next is dive deeper into the medically managed group. There is a cohort in there that’s incredibly sick and are likely to drive costs and be prone to readmission. And there’s another component of the medically managed group that had to be fairly healthy because they were able to undergo coronary artery bypass surgery within 90 days,” Dr. Kugelmass said.
He reported having no financial conflicts regarding his study.
WASHINGTON – In a large population of Medicare patients hospitalized for acute MI, four factors stood out as predictors of increased likelihood of readmission within 90 days, Aaron D. Kugelmass, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.
These four predictors of 90-day readmission were end-stage renal disease at the time of the initial admission for MI, which in a logistic regression model was independently associated with an 88% relative increase in readmission risk; no percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the index hospitalization, which carried a 64% increase in risk; type 1 diabetes, with a 57% increased readmission rate; and heart failure at the initial hospitalization, with an associated 34% greater risk, according to Dr. Kugelmass, chief of cardiology and medical director of the heart and vascular center at Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, Mass.
This is important new information for cardiologists and hospital administrators as they gear up for Medicare’s planned introduction of an episodic bundled payment model for patients with acute MI. In the initial phase of the project, which starts in July, approximately 1,120 hospitals in 98 metropolitan areas will be required to take financial responsibility for all inpatient and outpatient costs accrued during a Medicare beneficiary’s initial hospitalization for acute MI and for 90 days post discharge. The hospitals will be paid a fixed target price for each bundled 90-day acute MI care episode. The intent is to provide incentives for hospitals, physicians, and other health care providers to improve coordination of care with a goal of improved quality at reduced cost.
“This is going to be a learning curve for everyone,” he said.
“The best way to deal with this change is to understand the factors driving costs and morbidity and mortality,” Dr. Kugelmass said, in explaining why he conducted a retrospective study of readmissions within 90 days in a population of 143,286 Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for acute MI in 2014. The study focus was on readmissions because they add so much to total cost of care for a 90-day episode.
Twenty-eight percent of patients were readmitted at least once within 90 days of discharge following their acute MI. The Medicare bundled payment plan divides MI patients into two separate groups: those who undergo PCI during their initial hospitalization and those who receive medical management only. Thirty-one percent of the readmitted patients in Dr. Kugelmass’s study had undergone PCI during their index hospitalization, while the other 69% were managed medically.
Heart failure was the No. 1 reason for readmission within 90 days in patients who had PCI during the index hospitalization. It was the primary reason for 17.6% of readmissions. Next came recurrent angina or chest pain, which accounted for 6.6% of readmissions; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or pneumonia, 6.3%; and GI bleeding with hemorrhage, which was the primary reason for 6.0% of readmissions. Together these four causes accounted for more than 36% of all readmissions in the PCI group.
“The GI bleeding data were really interesting,” the cardiologist said. “There’s a lot of talk now about reducing the duration of dual-antiplatelet therapy [DAPT] after PCI. This is an administrative data set that’s quite large, and it shows that GI bleeding in a post-PCI group early in the duration of DAPT is in fact a significant cause of readmission and poses significant hazard.”
Among patients who were medically managed during their index hospitalization, the top four reasons for readmission were heart failure, accounting for 20.6% of readmissions; cardiac surgery, 13.5%; sepsis, 7.8%; and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/pneumonia, 6.3%. GI bleeding wasn’t a significant cause of readmission in this group.
“I think what we need to do next is dive deeper into the medically managed group. There is a cohort in there that’s incredibly sick and are likely to drive costs and be prone to readmission. And there’s another component of the medically managed group that had to be fairly healthy because they were able to undergo coronary artery bypass surgery within 90 days,” Dr. Kugelmass said.
He reported having no financial conflicts regarding his study.
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Twenty-eight percent of Medicare patients hospitalized for acute MI were readmitted within 90 days.
Data source: A retrospective study of readmissions within 90 days among more than 143,000 Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for acute MI in 2014.
Disclosures: The study presenter reported having no financial conflicts.
Save the Date: Heart Valve Summit: Medical, Surgical and Interventional Decision Making
The American College of Cardiology and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery are once again partnering to bring together cardiologists and surgeons in a cooperative, case-based course to address the rapid advances in the treatment of valvular heart disease.
October 5-7, 2017
Radisson Blu Aqua Hotel
Chicago, IL, USA
Program Overview
With the tradition of interactivity and practical decision making, the unique Heart Valve Summit is designed to engage participants in discussions, debates and potential controversies surrounding real-world cases with renowned faculty on the cutting edge of clinically relevant data for valvular heart disease management.
This interdisciplinary course emphasizes clinical decision making while combining the most relevant medical, surgical and interventional options for patient care. Tools for management are rapidly advancing and can significantly impact the entire care team. Breakout sessions for cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, nurses and physician assistants are designed to help specialists manage their unique challenges from a team perspective.
Course Directors
David H. Adams
Steven F. Bolling
Robert O. Bonow
Howard C. Herrmann
Nurse Planner
Michele Mistovich
The American College of Cardiology and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery are once again partnering to bring together cardiologists and surgeons in a cooperative, case-based course to address the rapid advances in the treatment of valvular heart disease.
October 5-7, 2017
Radisson Blu Aqua Hotel
Chicago, IL, USA
Program Overview
With the tradition of interactivity and practical decision making, the unique Heart Valve Summit is designed to engage participants in discussions, debates and potential controversies surrounding real-world cases with renowned faculty on the cutting edge of clinically relevant data for valvular heart disease management.
This interdisciplinary course emphasizes clinical decision making while combining the most relevant medical, surgical and interventional options for patient care. Tools for management are rapidly advancing and can significantly impact the entire care team. Breakout sessions for cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, nurses and physician assistants are designed to help specialists manage their unique challenges from a team perspective.
Course Directors
David H. Adams
Steven F. Bolling
Robert O. Bonow
Howard C. Herrmann
Nurse Planner
Michele Mistovich
The American College of Cardiology and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery are once again partnering to bring together cardiologists and surgeons in a cooperative, case-based course to address the rapid advances in the treatment of valvular heart disease.
October 5-7, 2017
Radisson Blu Aqua Hotel
Chicago, IL, USA
Program Overview
With the tradition of interactivity and practical decision making, the unique Heart Valve Summit is designed to engage participants in discussions, debates and potential controversies surrounding real-world cases with renowned faculty on the cutting edge of clinically relevant data for valvular heart disease management.
This interdisciplinary course emphasizes clinical decision making while combining the most relevant medical, surgical and interventional options for patient care. Tools for management are rapidly advancing and can significantly impact the entire care team. Breakout sessions for cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, nurses and physician assistants are designed to help specialists manage their unique challenges from a team perspective.
Course Directors
David H. Adams
Steven F. Bolling
Robert O. Bonow
Howard C. Herrmann
Nurse Planner
Michele Mistovich
Join us at the AATS Innovation Summit
Ignite your spirit for innovation at the 2017 AATS Innovation Summit.
Saturday, April 29, 2017
Boston Marriott Copley Place Hotel
Boston, MA
Course Director
W. Randolph Chitwood, Jr.
Program Overview
This one-day program will assist cardiothoracic surgeons in developing new clinically applicable technology by obtaining the cross-specialty knowledge needed for novel idea generation, protecting intellectual property, developmental funding, clinical trials, regulatory pathways and industry relations.
Target Audience
The summit is aimed at cardiothoracic surgeons who are interested in gaining the knowledge and tools to develop new clinically applicable technology. Attendees will craft new ideas with a long-term focus on creating partnerships with industry and incubators leading to enduring pathways for surgeons to become the architects of the future for cardiothoracic therapy.
Ignite your spirit for innovation at the 2017 AATS Innovation Summit.
Saturday, April 29, 2017
Boston Marriott Copley Place Hotel
Boston, MA
Course Director
W. Randolph Chitwood, Jr.
Program Overview
This one-day program will assist cardiothoracic surgeons in developing new clinically applicable technology by obtaining the cross-specialty knowledge needed for novel idea generation, protecting intellectual property, developmental funding, clinical trials, regulatory pathways and industry relations.
Target Audience
The summit is aimed at cardiothoracic surgeons who are interested in gaining the knowledge and tools to develop new clinically applicable technology. Attendees will craft new ideas with a long-term focus on creating partnerships with industry and incubators leading to enduring pathways for surgeons to become the architects of the future for cardiothoracic therapy.
Ignite your spirit for innovation at the 2017 AATS Innovation Summit.
Saturday, April 29, 2017
Boston Marriott Copley Place Hotel
Boston, MA
Course Director
W. Randolph Chitwood, Jr.
Program Overview
This one-day program will assist cardiothoracic surgeons in developing new clinically applicable technology by obtaining the cross-specialty knowledge needed for novel idea generation, protecting intellectual property, developmental funding, clinical trials, regulatory pathways and industry relations.
Target Audience
The summit is aimed at cardiothoracic surgeons who are interested in gaining the knowledge and tools to develop new clinically applicable technology. Attendees will craft new ideas with a long-term focus on creating partnerships with industry and incubators leading to enduring pathways for surgeons to become the architects of the future for cardiothoracic therapy.
Register for the AATS Mitral Conclave
Registration and housing information is available for AATS Mitral Conclave, which immediately precedes the AATS Centennial. Take a look at the preliminary program that is available online to see the many interesting and novel sessions scheduled for the meeting.
Thursday, April 27 – Friday, April 28, 2017
New York Hilton Midtown Hotel
New York, NY
Program Overview
The AATS Mitral Conclave will bring the world's leading figures in mitral valve disease together for two days to discuss the latest information regarding management guidelines, imaging, pathology, minimally invasive and percutaneous approaches, surgical techniques, devices, and long-term results. Faculty will present the latest available data, techniques, and state of the art reviews, supplemented by abstract and video presentations selected by the program committee from submitted original work.
Course Director
David H. Adams
Program Committee
Anelechi C. Anyanwu
Tirone E. David
Pedro J. del Nido
Gilles D. Dreyfus
Khalil Fattouch
D. Craig Miller
Rakesh M. Suri
Vinod H. Thourani
View the preliminary program, registration & housing information
Registration and housing information is available for AATS Mitral Conclave, which immediately precedes the AATS Centennial. Take a look at the preliminary program that is available online to see the many interesting and novel sessions scheduled for the meeting.
Thursday, April 27 – Friday, April 28, 2017
New York Hilton Midtown Hotel
New York, NY
Program Overview
The AATS Mitral Conclave will bring the world's leading figures in mitral valve disease together for two days to discuss the latest information regarding management guidelines, imaging, pathology, minimally invasive and percutaneous approaches, surgical techniques, devices, and long-term results. Faculty will present the latest available data, techniques, and state of the art reviews, supplemented by abstract and video presentations selected by the program committee from submitted original work.
Course Director
David H. Adams
Program Committee
Anelechi C. Anyanwu
Tirone E. David
Pedro J. del Nido
Gilles D. Dreyfus
Khalil Fattouch
D. Craig Miller
Rakesh M. Suri
Vinod H. Thourani
View the preliminary program, registration & housing information
Registration and housing information is available for AATS Mitral Conclave, which immediately precedes the AATS Centennial. Take a look at the preliminary program that is available online to see the many interesting and novel sessions scheduled for the meeting.
Thursday, April 27 – Friday, April 28, 2017
New York Hilton Midtown Hotel
New York, NY
Program Overview
The AATS Mitral Conclave will bring the world's leading figures in mitral valve disease together for two days to discuss the latest information regarding management guidelines, imaging, pathology, minimally invasive and percutaneous approaches, surgical techniques, devices, and long-term results. Faculty will present the latest available data, techniques, and state of the art reviews, supplemented by abstract and video presentations selected by the program committee from submitted original work.
Course Director
David H. Adams
Program Committee
Anelechi C. Anyanwu
Tirone E. David
Pedro J. del Nido
Gilles D. Dreyfus
Khalil Fattouch
D. Craig Miller
Rakesh M. Suri
Vinod H. Thourani
View the preliminary program, registration & housing information
See you at AATS Week 2017
Join the world’s foremost cardiothoracic surgery scientists and medical professionals during this once-in-a-lifetime week of meetings. Celebrate the history of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and our specialty through unique events and activities while continuing your commitment to life-long learning at three incredible events.
AATS Mitral Conclave 2017
April 27-28, 2017
New York Hilton Midtown
New York, NY
AATS Innovation Summit
April 29, 2017
Boston Marriott Copley Place Hotel
Boston, MA
AATS Centennial
April 29 – May 3, 2017
Boston Hynes Convention Center
Boston, MA
Register for AATS Week 2017 today & receive a $100 discount off the AATS Mitral Conclave registration fee.
Join the world’s foremost cardiothoracic surgery scientists and medical professionals during this once-in-a-lifetime week of meetings. Celebrate the history of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and our specialty through unique events and activities while continuing your commitment to life-long learning at three incredible events.
AATS Mitral Conclave 2017
April 27-28, 2017
New York Hilton Midtown
New York, NY
AATS Innovation Summit
April 29, 2017
Boston Marriott Copley Place Hotel
Boston, MA
AATS Centennial
April 29 – May 3, 2017
Boston Hynes Convention Center
Boston, MA
Register for AATS Week 2017 today & receive a $100 discount off the AATS Mitral Conclave registration fee.
Join the world’s foremost cardiothoracic surgery scientists and medical professionals during this once-in-a-lifetime week of meetings. Celebrate the history of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and our specialty through unique events and activities while continuing your commitment to life-long learning at three incredible events.
AATS Mitral Conclave 2017
April 27-28, 2017
New York Hilton Midtown
New York, NY
AATS Innovation Summit
April 29, 2017
Boston Marriott Copley Place Hotel
Boston, MA
AATS Centennial
April 29 – May 3, 2017
Boston Hynes Convention Center
Boston, MA
Register for AATS Week 2017 today & receive a $100 discount off the AATS Mitral Conclave registration fee.