Follicular Lymphoma

 

 

Micrograph showing FL

 

The European Medicine Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has recommended that obinutuzumab (Gazyvaro), an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, be approved for use in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL).

The recommended indication is for obinutuzumab to be given first in combination with bendamustine and then as maintenance therapy in FL patients who did not respond to, progressed during, or progressed up to 6 months after treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen.

Based on the CHMP’s recommendation, a final decision regarding the approval of obinutuzumab in FL is expected from the European Commission in the coming months.

Obinutuzumab is already approved in the European Union for use in combination with chlorambucil to treat patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia and comorbidities that make them unsuitable for full-dose fludarabine-based therapy.

Obinutuzumab is being developed by Roche.

GADOLIN trial

The CHMP’s recommendation to approve obinutuzumab in FL is based on results from the phase 3 GADOLIN trial. The study included 413 patients with rituximab-refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including 321 patients with FL, 46 with marginal zone lymphoma, and 28 with small lymphocytic lymphoma.

The patients were randomized to receive bendamustine alone (control arm) or a combination of bendamustine and obinutuzumab followed by obinutuzumab maintenance (every 2 months for 2 years or until progression).

The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), as assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). The secondary endpoints were PFS assessed by investigator review, best overall response, complete response (CR), partial response (PR), duration of response, overall survival, and safety profile.

Among patients with FL, the obinutuzumab regimen improved PFS compared to bendamustine alone, as assessed by IRC (hazard ratio [HR]=0.48, P<0.0001). The median PFS was not reached in patients receiving the obinutuzumab regimen but was 13.8 months in those receiving bendamustine alone.

Investigator-assessed PFS was consistent with IRC-assessed PFS. Investigators said the median PFS with the obinutuzumab regimen was more than double that with bendamustine alone—29.2 months vs 13.7 months (HR=0.48, P<0.0001).

The best overall response for patients receiving the obinutuzumab regimen was 78.7% (15.5% CR, 63.2% PR), compared to 74.7% for those receiving bendamustine alone (18.7% CR, 56% PR), as assessed by the IRC.

The median duration of response was not reached for patients receiving the obinutuzumab regimen and was 11.6 months for those receiving bendamustine alone.

The median overall survival has not yet been reached in either study arm.

The most common grade 3/4 adverse events observed in patients receiving the obinutuzumab regimen were neutropenia (33%), infusion reactions (11%), and thrombocytopenia (10%).

The most common adverse events of any grade were infusion reactions (69%), neutropenia (35%), nausea (54%), fatigue (39%), cough (26%), diarrhea (27%), constipation (19%), fever (18%), thrombocytopenia (15%), vomiting (22%), upper respiratory tract infection (13%), decreased appetite (18%), joint or muscle pain (12%), sinusitis (12%), anemia (12%), general weakness (11%), and urinary tract infection (10%).

 

 

Micrograph showing FL

 

The European Medicine Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has recommended that obinutuzumab (Gazyvaro), an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, be approved for use in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL).

The recommended indication is for obinutuzumab to be given first in combination with bendamustine and then as maintenance therapy in FL patients who did not respond to, progressed during, or progressed up to 6 months after treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen.

Based on the CHMP’s recommendation, a final decision regarding the approval of obinutuzumab in FL is expected from the European Commission in the coming months.

Obinutuzumab is already approved in the European Union for use in combination with chlorambucil to treat patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia and comorbidities that make them unsuitable for full-dose fludarabine-based therapy.

Obinutuzumab is being developed by Roche.

GADOLIN trial

The CHMP’s recommendation to approve obinutuzumab in FL is based on results from the phase 3 GADOLIN trial. The study included 413 patients with rituximab-refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including 321 patients with FL, 46 with marginal zone lymphoma, and 28 with small lymphocytic lymphoma.

The patients were randomized to receive bendamustine alone (control arm) or a combination of bendamustine and obinutuzumab followed by obinutuzumab maintenance (every 2 months for 2 years or until progression).

The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), as assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). The secondary endpoints were PFS assessed by investigator review, best overall response, complete response (CR), partial response (PR), duration of response, overall survival, and safety profile.

Among patients with FL, the obinutuzumab regimen improved PFS compared to bendamustine alone, as assessed by IRC (hazard ratio [HR]=0.48, P<0.0001). The median PFS was not reached in patients receiving the obinutuzumab regimen but was 13.8 months in those receiving bendamustine alone.

Investigator-assessed PFS was consistent with IRC-assessed PFS. Investigators said the median PFS with the obinutuzumab regimen was more than double that with bendamustine alone—29.2 months vs 13.7 months (HR=0.48, P<0.0001).

The best overall response for patients receiving the obinutuzumab regimen was 78.7% (15.5% CR, 63.2% PR), compared to 74.7% for those receiving bendamustine alone (18.7% CR, 56% PR), as assessed by the IRC.

The median duration of response was not reached for patients receiving the obinutuzumab regimen and was 11.6 months for those receiving bendamustine alone.

The median overall survival has not yet been reached in either study arm.

The most common grade 3/4 adverse events observed in patients receiving the obinutuzumab regimen were neutropenia (33%), infusion reactions (11%), and thrombocytopenia (10%).

The most common adverse events of any grade were infusion reactions (69%), neutropenia (35%), nausea (54%), fatigue (39%), cough (26%), diarrhea (27%), constipation (19%), fever (18%), thrombocytopenia (15%), vomiting (22%), upper respiratory tract infection (13%), decreased appetite (18%), joint or muscle pain (12%), sinusitis (12%), anemia (12%), general weakness (11%), and urinary tract infection (10%).

 

 

Micrograph showing FL

 

The European Medicine Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has recommended that obinutuzumab (Gazyvaro), an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, be approved for use in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL).

The recommended indication is for obinutuzumab to be given first in combination with bendamustine and then as maintenance therapy in FL patients who did not respond to, progressed during, or progressed up to 6 months after treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen.

Based on the CHMP’s recommendation, a final decision regarding the approval of obinutuzumab in FL is expected from the European Commission in the coming months.

Obinutuzumab is already approved in the European Union for use in combination with chlorambucil to treat patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia and comorbidities that make them unsuitable for full-dose fludarabine-based therapy.

Obinutuzumab is being developed by Roche.

GADOLIN trial

The CHMP’s recommendation to approve obinutuzumab in FL is based on results from the phase 3 GADOLIN trial. The study included 413 patients with rituximab-refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including 321 patients with FL, 46 with marginal zone lymphoma, and 28 with small lymphocytic lymphoma.

The patients were randomized to receive bendamustine alone (control arm) or a combination of bendamustine and obinutuzumab followed by obinutuzumab maintenance (every 2 months for 2 years or until progression).

The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), as assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). The secondary endpoints were PFS assessed by investigator review, best overall response, complete response (CR), partial response (PR), duration of response, overall survival, and safety profile.

Among patients with FL, the obinutuzumab regimen improved PFS compared to bendamustine alone, as assessed by IRC (hazard ratio [HR]=0.48, P<0.0001). The median PFS was not reached in patients receiving the obinutuzumab regimen but was 13.8 months in those receiving bendamustine alone.

Investigator-assessed PFS was consistent with IRC-assessed PFS. Investigators said the median PFS with the obinutuzumab regimen was more than double that with bendamustine alone—29.2 months vs 13.7 months (HR=0.48, P<0.0001).

The best overall response for patients receiving the obinutuzumab regimen was 78.7% (15.5% CR, 63.2% PR), compared to 74.7% for those receiving bendamustine alone (18.7% CR, 56% PR), as assessed by the IRC.

The median duration of response was not reached for patients receiving the obinutuzumab regimen and was 11.6 months for those receiving bendamustine alone.

The median overall survival has not yet been reached in either study arm.

The most common grade 3/4 adverse events observed in patients receiving the obinutuzumab regimen were neutropenia (33%), infusion reactions (11%), and thrombocytopenia (10%).

The most common adverse events of any grade were infusion reactions (69%), neutropenia (35%), nausea (54%), fatigue (39%), cough (26%), diarrhea (27%), constipation (19%), fever (18%), thrombocytopenia (15%), vomiting (22%), upper respiratory tract infection (13%), decreased appetite (18%), joint or muscle pain (12%), sinusitis (12%), anemia (12%), general weakness (11%), and urinary tract infection (10%).

Fewer than 8% of cases of nodular lymphocyte–predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) transformed to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), based on a large prospective single-center study with long-term follow-up.

This rate was lower than the risk of transformation reported for transformed follicular lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia, according to Dr. Saad Kenderian and his associates at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. Transformation was significantly associated with splenic involvement at presentation and with prior chemotherapy exposure, but did not worsen overall survival, they added.

WikimediaCommons/Copyright © 2011 Michael Bonert.

“To our knowledge, this cohort represents the largest analysis to date of consecutive patients with NLPHL,” they said.

The study comprised 222 patients with newly diagnosed NLPHL who were treated at Mayo Clinic between 1970 and 2011. Median age at diagnosis was 40 years, and two-thirds of patients were men. The median follow-up period was 16 years (Blood 2016;12:1960-6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-08-665505).

During follow up, 17 cases (7.6%) transformed to DLBCL, for a transformation rate of 0.74 cases for every 100 patient-years, the investigators said. Median time to transformation was 35 months (range, 6-268 months). Predictors of transformation included any prior chemotherapy exposure (P = .04) and splenic involvement (P = .03). The rates of 40-year freedom from transformation were 87% when there was no splenic involvement and 21% when the spleen was involved, and were 87% if radiation therapy was used as a single modality compared with 77% in patients treated with prior chemotherapy or chemoradiation.

Five-year overall survival was 76% in patients with transformed disease, which was similar to overall survival among patients whose disease did not transform to DLBCL, the researchers noted.

Other studies of NLPHL have reported anywhere from a 2% to a 17% transformation rate, but those studies had smaller sample sizes, shorter follow-up periods, and less rigorous enrollment criteria and methods to confirm transformation, the investigators noted. “The finding of splenic involvement as a risk factor for transformation was reported by previous investigators. Interestingly, the association between exposure to prior chemotherapy and reduced freedom from transformation has not been reported in the past, but it has been observed in other low-grade lymphoma studies,” they added. “In contrast to follicular lymphoma, transformed NLPHL is not associated with an adverse impact on OS, suggesting a possibly different biology of transformation.”

The research was partially supported by Lymphoma SPORE and the Predolin Foundation. The investigators had no disclosures.

Fewer than 8% of cases of nodular lymphocyte–predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) transformed to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), based on a large prospective single-center study with long-term follow-up.

This rate was lower than the risk of transformation reported for transformed follicular lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia, according to Dr. Saad Kenderian and his associates at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. Transformation was significantly associated with splenic involvement at presentation and with prior chemotherapy exposure, but did not worsen overall survival, they added.

WikimediaCommons/Copyright © 2011 Michael Bonert.

“To our knowledge, this cohort represents the largest analysis to date of consecutive patients with NLPHL,” they said.

The study comprised 222 patients with newly diagnosed NLPHL who were treated at Mayo Clinic between 1970 and 2011. Median age at diagnosis was 40 years, and two-thirds of patients were men. The median follow-up period was 16 years (Blood 2016;12:1960-6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-08-665505).

During follow up, 17 cases (7.6%) transformed to DLBCL, for a transformation rate of 0.74 cases for every 100 patient-years, the investigators said. Median time to transformation was 35 months (range, 6-268 months). Predictors of transformation included any prior chemotherapy exposure (P = .04) and splenic involvement (P = .03). The rates of 40-year freedom from transformation were 87% when there was no splenic involvement and 21% when the spleen was involved, and were 87% if radiation therapy was used as a single modality compared with 77% in patients treated with prior chemotherapy or chemoradiation.

Five-year overall survival was 76% in patients with transformed disease, which was similar to overall survival among patients whose disease did not transform to DLBCL, the researchers noted.

Other studies of NLPHL have reported anywhere from a 2% to a 17% transformation rate, but those studies had smaller sample sizes, shorter follow-up periods, and less rigorous enrollment criteria and methods to confirm transformation, the investigators noted. “The finding of splenic involvement as a risk factor for transformation was reported by previous investigators. Interestingly, the association between exposure to prior chemotherapy and reduced freedom from transformation has not been reported in the past, but it has been observed in other low-grade lymphoma studies,” they added. “In contrast to follicular lymphoma, transformed NLPHL is not associated with an adverse impact on OS, suggesting a possibly different biology of transformation.”

The research was partially supported by Lymphoma SPORE and the Predolin Foundation. The investigators had no disclosures.

Fewer than 8% of cases of nodular lymphocyte–predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) transformed to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), based on a large prospective single-center study with long-term follow-up.

This rate was lower than the risk of transformation reported for transformed follicular lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia, according to Dr. Saad Kenderian and his associates at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. Transformation was significantly associated with splenic involvement at presentation and with prior chemotherapy exposure, but did not worsen overall survival, they added.

WikimediaCommons/Copyright © 2011 Michael Bonert.

“To our knowledge, this cohort represents the largest analysis to date of consecutive patients with NLPHL,” they said.

The study comprised 222 patients with newly diagnosed NLPHL who were treated at Mayo Clinic between 1970 and 2011. Median age at diagnosis was 40 years, and two-thirds of patients were men. The median follow-up period was 16 years (Blood 2016;12:1960-6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-08-665505).

During follow up, 17 cases (7.6%) transformed to DLBCL, for a transformation rate of 0.74 cases for every 100 patient-years, the investigators said. Median time to transformation was 35 months (range, 6-268 months). Predictors of transformation included any prior chemotherapy exposure (P = .04) and splenic involvement (P = .03). The rates of 40-year freedom from transformation were 87% when there was no splenic involvement and 21% when the spleen was involved, and were 87% if radiation therapy was used as a single modality compared with 77% in patients treated with prior chemotherapy or chemoradiation.

Five-year overall survival was 76% in patients with transformed disease, which was similar to overall survival among patients whose disease did not transform to DLBCL, the researchers noted.

Other studies of NLPHL have reported anywhere from a 2% to a 17% transformation rate, but those studies had smaller sample sizes, shorter follow-up periods, and less rigorous enrollment criteria and methods to confirm transformation, the investigators noted. “The finding of splenic involvement as a risk factor for transformation was reported by previous investigators. Interestingly, the association between exposure to prior chemotherapy and reduced freedom from transformation has not been reported in the past, but it has been observed in other low-grade lymphoma studies,” they added. “In contrast to follicular lymphoma, transformed NLPHL is not associated with an adverse impact on OS, suggesting a possibly different biology of transformation.”

The research was partially supported by Lymphoma SPORE and the Predolin Foundation. The investigators had no disclosures.

 

 

Attendees in session at

2016 AACR Annual Meeting

© AACR/Todd Buchanan

 

NEW ORLEANS—Administering an antibody-radionuclide conjugate after B-cell depletion with rituximab can produce lasting responses in patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to a phase 1/2 study.

The conjugate, 177Lu-DOTA-HH1 (Betalutin), consists of the tumor-specific antibody HH1, which targets the CD37 antigen on the surface of NHL cells, conjugated to the β-emitting isotope lutetium-177 (Lu-177) via the chemical linker DOTA.

In an ongoing phase 1/2 study, Betalutin given after rituximab produced an overall response rate of 63.2%.

The median duration of response has not yet been reached, and 1 patient has maintained a response for more than 36 months.

In addition, the researchers said Betalutin was well tolerated, with a predictable and manageable safety profile. Most adverse events were hematologic, and all have been transient and reversible.

These results were presented at the 2016 AACR Annual Meeting (abstract LB-252*). The study is sponsored by Nordic Nanovector ASA.

Patients and study design

The researchers presented data on 21 patients—19 with follicular lymphoma and 2 with mantle cell lymphoma. All tumors were positive for CD37.

The patients’ median age was 68 (range, 41-78). Sixty-seven percent were male, and they had received 1 to 8 prior treatment regimens.

In this dose-escalation study, patients received Betalutin at 3 different doses, but they were also divided into 2 arms according to predosing with cold HH1 antibody.

In Arm 1 (n=12), patients received rituximab (at 375 mg/m²) on day -28 and -21 to deplete circulating B cells. On day 0, predosing with 50 mg HH1 was given before Betalutin injection. Then, patients received Betalutin at 10 MBq/kg (n=3), 15 MBq/kg (n=6), or 20 MBq/kg (n=3).

In Arm 2 (n=4), patients received rituximab at the same dose and schedule as Arm 1, but Betalutin was administered without HH1 predosing on day 0 at either 10 MBq/kg (n=2) or 15 MBq/kg (n=2).

The first patient treated on this trial received 250 mg/m² of rituximab on day -7 and day 0 prior to Betalutin administration and was included in the 10 MBq/kg group in Arm 2.

The 15 MBq/kg dose level of Arm 1 has been expanded into the phase 2 portion of the study, as dose-limiting toxicities occurred at the 20 MBq/kg dose. Five patients have been treated in the phase 2 portion.

Safety

Adverse events (AEs) from the phase 2 portion of the study were not reported, as the data are still being collected.

In the phase 1 portion, grade 3/4 AEs were hematologic in nature and included decreases in platelet counts (3 grade 3 and 6 grade 4) and neutrophil counts (5 grade 3 and 4 grade 4).

Serious AEs included decreases in platelet counts (n=2), atrial fibrillation (n=2), epistaxis (n=1), fractured sternum (n=1), decreased neutrophil count (n=1), pharyngitis (n=1), pneumonia (n=1), pulmonary embolism (n=1), and sepsis (n=1).

The pulmonary embolism was deemed unrelated to treatment, but the remaining events were considered possibly or probably related to Betalutin.

The researchers noted that 1 patient experienced pharyngitis, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, epistaxis, sepsis, and a decrease in lymphocyte count.

All patients’ platelets and neutrophils recovered. Two patients required platelet transfusions—one patient in the 20 MBq/kg cohort of Arm 1 and one patient in the 15 MBq/kg cohort of Arm 2.

Efficacy

Nineteen patients were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 63.2% (n=12) and included both complete (31.6%, n=6) and partial responses (31.6%, n=6). Progression occurred in 21.1% of patients (n=4), and 15.8% (n=3) had stable disease.

The researchers presented data on 9 patients treated at the recommended 15 MBq/kg dose level with 50 mg HH1 predosing. Five patients were treated in phase 1 and 4 in phase 2. One of these patients was excluded from the analysis due to transformed lymphoma.

Two patients in phase 1 responded—both complete responses—and 3 patients in phase 2 responded—2 complete and 1 partial response.

For the entire study cohort, the median duration of response has not yet been reached. Six responses are ongoing—2 for 3+ months, 1 for 6+ months, 1 for 18+ months, 1 for 24+ months, and 1 for 36+ months.

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

 

 

Attendees in session at

2016 AACR Annual Meeting

© AACR/Todd Buchanan

 

NEW ORLEANS—Administering an antibody-radionuclide conjugate after B-cell depletion with rituximab can produce lasting responses in patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to a phase 1/2 study.

The conjugate, 177Lu-DOTA-HH1 (Betalutin), consists of the tumor-specific antibody HH1, which targets the CD37 antigen on the surface of NHL cells, conjugated to the β-emitting isotope lutetium-177 (Lu-177) via the chemical linker DOTA.

In an ongoing phase 1/2 study, Betalutin given after rituximab produced an overall response rate of 63.2%.

The median duration of response has not yet been reached, and 1 patient has maintained a response for more than 36 months.

In addition, the researchers said Betalutin was well tolerated, with a predictable and manageable safety profile. Most adverse events were hematologic, and all have been transient and reversible.

These results were presented at the 2016 AACR Annual Meeting (abstract LB-252*). The study is sponsored by Nordic Nanovector ASA.

Patients and study design

The researchers presented data on 21 patients—19 with follicular lymphoma and 2 with mantle cell lymphoma. All tumors were positive for CD37.

The patients’ median age was 68 (range, 41-78). Sixty-seven percent were male, and they had received 1 to 8 prior treatment regimens.

In this dose-escalation study, patients received Betalutin at 3 different doses, but they were also divided into 2 arms according to predosing with cold HH1 antibody.

In Arm 1 (n=12), patients received rituximab (at 375 mg/m²) on day -28 and -21 to deplete circulating B cells. On day 0, predosing with 50 mg HH1 was given before Betalutin injection. Then, patients received Betalutin at 10 MBq/kg (n=3), 15 MBq/kg (n=6), or 20 MBq/kg (n=3).

In Arm 2 (n=4), patients received rituximab at the same dose and schedule as Arm 1, but Betalutin was administered without HH1 predosing on day 0 at either 10 MBq/kg (n=2) or 15 MBq/kg (n=2).

The first patient treated on this trial received 250 mg/m² of rituximab on day -7 and day 0 prior to Betalutin administration and was included in the 10 MBq/kg group in Arm 2.

The 15 MBq/kg dose level of Arm 1 has been expanded into the phase 2 portion of the study, as dose-limiting toxicities occurred at the 20 MBq/kg dose. Five patients have been treated in the phase 2 portion.

Safety

Adverse events (AEs) from the phase 2 portion of the study were not reported, as the data are still being collected.

In the phase 1 portion, grade 3/4 AEs were hematologic in nature and included decreases in platelet counts (3 grade 3 and 6 grade 4) and neutrophil counts (5 grade 3 and 4 grade 4).

Serious AEs included decreases in platelet counts (n=2), atrial fibrillation (n=2), epistaxis (n=1), fractured sternum (n=1), decreased neutrophil count (n=1), pharyngitis (n=1), pneumonia (n=1), pulmonary embolism (n=1), and sepsis (n=1).

The pulmonary embolism was deemed unrelated to treatment, but the remaining events were considered possibly or probably related to Betalutin.

The researchers noted that 1 patient experienced pharyngitis, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, epistaxis, sepsis, and a decrease in lymphocyte count.

All patients’ platelets and neutrophils recovered. Two patients required platelet transfusions—one patient in the 20 MBq/kg cohort of Arm 1 and one patient in the 15 MBq/kg cohort of Arm 2.

Efficacy

Nineteen patients were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 63.2% (n=12) and included both complete (31.6%, n=6) and partial responses (31.6%, n=6). Progression occurred in 21.1% of patients (n=4), and 15.8% (n=3) had stable disease.

The researchers presented data on 9 patients treated at the recommended 15 MBq/kg dose level with 50 mg HH1 predosing. Five patients were treated in phase 1 and 4 in phase 2. One of these patients was excluded from the analysis due to transformed lymphoma.

Two patients in phase 1 responded—both complete responses—and 3 patients in phase 2 responded—2 complete and 1 partial response.

For the entire study cohort, the median duration of response has not yet been reached. Six responses are ongoing—2 for 3+ months, 1 for 6+ months, 1 for 18+ months, 1 for 24+ months, and 1 for 36+ months.

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

 

 

Attendees in session at

2016 AACR Annual Meeting

© AACR/Todd Buchanan

 

NEW ORLEANS—Administering an antibody-radionuclide conjugate after B-cell depletion with rituximab can produce lasting responses in patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to a phase 1/2 study.

The conjugate, 177Lu-DOTA-HH1 (Betalutin), consists of the tumor-specific antibody HH1, which targets the CD37 antigen on the surface of NHL cells, conjugated to the β-emitting isotope lutetium-177 (Lu-177) via the chemical linker DOTA.

In an ongoing phase 1/2 study, Betalutin given after rituximab produced an overall response rate of 63.2%.

The median duration of response has not yet been reached, and 1 patient has maintained a response for more than 36 months.

In addition, the researchers said Betalutin was well tolerated, with a predictable and manageable safety profile. Most adverse events were hematologic, and all have been transient and reversible.

These results were presented at the 2016 AACR Annual Meeting (abstract LB-252*). The study is sponsored by Nordic Nanovector ASA.

Patients and study design

The researchers presented data on 21 patients—19 with follicular lymphoma and 2 with mantle cell lymphoma. All tumors were positive for CD37.

The patients’ median age was 68 (range, 41-78). Sixty-seven percent were male, and they had received 1 to 8 prior treatment regimens.

In this dose-escalation study, patients received Betalutin at 3 different doses, but they were also divided into 2 arms according to predosing with cold HH1 antibody.

In Arm 1 (n=12), patients received rituximab (at 375 mg/m²) on day -28 and -21 to deplete circulating B cells. On day 0, predosing with 50 mg HH1 was given before Betalutin injection. Then, patients received Betalutin at 10 MBq/kg (n=3), 15 MBq/kg (n=6), or 20 MBq/kg (n=3).

In Arm 2 (n=4), patients received rituximab at the same dose and schedule as Arm 1, but Betalutin was administered without HH1 predosing on day 0 at either 10 MBq/kg (n=2) or 15 MBq/kg (n=2).

The first patient treated on this trial received 250 mg/m² of rituximab on day -7 and day 0 prior to Betalutin administration and was included in the 10 MBq/kg group in Arm 2.

The 15 MBq/kg dose level of Arm 1 has been expanded into the phase 2 portion of the study, as dose-limiting toxicities occurred at the 20 MBq/kg dose. Five patients have been treated in the phase 2 portion.

Safety

Adverse events (AEs) from the phase 2 portion of the study were not reported, as the data are still being collected.

In the phase 1 portion, grade 3/4 AEs were hematologic in nature and included decreases in platelet counts (3 grade 3 and 6 grade 4) and neutrophil counts (5 grade 3 and 4 grade 4).

Serious AEs included decreases in platelet counts (n=2), atrial fibrillation (n=2), epistaxis (n=1), fractured sternum (n=1), decreased neutrophil count (n=1), pharyngitis (n=1), pneumonia (n=1), pulmonary embolism (n=1), and sepsis (n=1).

The pulmonary embolism was deemed unrelated to treatment, but the remaining events were considered possibly or probably related to Betalutin.

The researchers noted that 1 patient experienced pharyngitis, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, epistaxis, sepsis, and a decrease in lymphocyte count.

All patients’ platelets and neutrophils recovered. Two patients required platelet transfusions—one patient in the 20 MBq/kg cohort of Arm 1 and one patient in the 15 MBq/kg cohort of Arm 2.

Efficacy

Nineteen patients were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 63.2% (n=12) and included both complete (31.6%, n=6) and partial responses (31.6%, n=6). Progression occurred in 21.1% of patients (n=4), and 15.8% (n=3) had stable disease.

The researchers presented data on 9 patients treated at the recommended 15 MBq/kg dose level with 50 mg HH1 predosing. Five patients were treated in phase 1 and 4 in phase 2. One of these patients was excluded from the analysis due to transformed lymphoma.

Two patients in phase 1 responded—both complete responses—and 3 patients in phase 2 responded—2 complete and 1 partial response.

For the entire study cohort, the median duration of response has not yet been reached. Six responses are ongoing—2 for 3+ months, 1 for 6+ months, 1 for 18+ months, 1 for 24+ months, and 1 for 36+ months.

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

 

 

Micrograph showing

follicular lymphoma

 

NEW ORLEANS—The TLR9 agonist SD-101 has produced encouraging early results in patients with low-grade B-cell lymphoma, according to researchers.

In an ongoing phase 1/2 study, patients received low-dose radiation, followed by an injection of SD-101 into one of their tumors.

This prompted changes in the tumor microenvironment that potentially induced a systemic antitumor response and decreased the volume of both treated and untreated tumors.

In addition, SD-101 was considered well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities or maximum-tolerated dose.

“We are pleased to have already demonstrated a safety profile, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy in this study,” said Ronald Levy, MD, of Stanford University in California.

Dr Levy and his colleagues presented these results at the 2016 AACR Annual Meeting (abstract CT047). The study is sponsored by Dynavax Technologies Corporation, the company developing SD-101.

The researchers reported data for 13 patients with untreated, low-grade B-cell lymphoma. They had a mean age of 63.2, and 53.8% were male.

Patients had follicular lymphoma (n=9), small lymphocytic lymphoma (n=2), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n=1), and nodal marginal zone lymphoma (n=1).

At least 2 sites of measurable disease were required for participation in this study. One site was treated with low-dose radiation (2 Gy) and injected with SD-101 on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29. Other lesions received no treatment.

In Part 1—the dose-escalation portion of the study—patients received SD-101 at 1 mg (n=3), 2 mg (n=3), 4 mg (n=3), or 8 mg (n=4). The phase 2 expansion portion of the study is ongoing, with enrollment in 2 dose cohorts (1 mg and 8 mg).

“This clinical trial design is unique and takes advantage of the fact that lymphoma patients have easily injectable sites of disease,” Dr Levy said. “The local injections are conveniently added to low-dose radiotherapy, a standard treatment for low-grade lymphoma.”

Safety

All 13 patients experienced at least 1 adverse event (AEs), although nearly all were grade 1 or 2.

The most common treatment-related AEs were local injection-site reactions and flu-like symptoms, including fever, chills, and myalgia (n=11 for all 3). However, the researchers said these AEs were primarily short-lived and controlled by over-the-counter acetaminophen in most cases.

In the 8 mg dosing cohort, 1 patient had grade 3 neutropenia and 2 had grade 3 malaise, all of which were considered treatment-related. In addition, there was a case of grade 3 asymptomatic pulmonary embolism in the 4 mg dose cohort, which was deemed serious but unrelated to treatment.

Efficacy

The researchers observed induction of interferon-responsive genes at all dose levels 24 hours after the second dose of SD-101 was given (Day 9).

In addition, T-cell numbers increased at the treated site by Day 8. The total T cells increased in 7 of 10 evaluable patients by Day 8 (range, >300% to 18%).

CD4+ and CD8+ T cells increased simultaneously in 5 of 7 evaluable patients, regulatory T cells decreased in 8 of 10 evaluable patients by Day 8, and follicular T helper cells decreased in 9 of 9 evaluable patients by Day 8.

Furthermore, treated and untreated tumors decreased in volume across all dose groups.

At Day 90, 12 patients had a reduction of the product of diameters in treated tumors (median -45.3%; range, -87 to +100), and 11 patients had a reduction in untreated tumors (median -8.1%; range, -48 to +45).

In 9 patients, these abscopal effects were sustained for at least 180 to 360 days.

However, 6 patients discontinued from the study due to progression. Three had radiographic progression—1 at Day 92 (in the 4 mg cohort) and 2 at 1 year (1 in the 1 mg cohort and 1 in the 2 mg cohort).

Two patients had clinical progression—1 at Day 197 (4 mg) and 1 at Day 273 (2 mg). And 1 patient discontinued at Day 203 due to a combination of clinical and radiographic progression (8 mg).

The researchers pointed out that there was no evidence of a dose response with SD-101, but the study included a limited number of patients.

 

 

Micrograph showing

follicular lymphoma

 

NEW ORLEANS—The TLR9 agonist SD-101 has produced encouraging early results in patients with low-grade B-cell lymphoma, according to researchers.

In an ongoing phase 1/2 study, patients received low-dose radiation, followed by an injection of SD-101 into one of their tumors.

This prompted changes in the tumor microenvironment that potentially induced a systemic antitumor response and decreased the volume of both treated and untreated tumors.

In addition, SD-101 was considered well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities or maximum-tolerated dose.

“We are pleased to have already demonstrated a safety profile, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy in this study,” said Ronald Levy, MD, of Stanford University in California.

Dr Levy and his colleagues presented these results at the 2016 AACR Annual Meeting (abstract CT047). The study is sponsored by Dynavax Technologies Corporation, the company developing SD-101.

The researchers reported data for 13 patients with untreated, low-grade B-cell lymphoma. They had a mean age of 63.2, and 53.8% were male.

Patients had follicular lymphoma (n=9), small lymphocytic lymphoma (n=2), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n=1), and nodal marginal zone lymphoma (n=1).

At least 2 sites of measurable disease were required for participation in this study. One site was treated with low-dose radiation (2 Gy) and injected with SD-101 on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29. Other lesions received no treatment.

In Part 1—the dose-escalation portion of the study—patients received SD-101 at 1 mg (n=3), 2 mg (n=3), 4 mg (n=3), or 8 mg (n=4). The phase 2 expansion portion of the study is ongoing, with enrollment in 2 dose cohorts (1 mg and 8 mg).

“This clinical trial design is unique and takes advantage of the fact that lymphoma patients have easily injectable sites of disease,” Dr Levy said. “The local injections are conveniently added to low-dose radiotherapy, a standard treatment for low-grade lymphoma.”

Safety

All 13 patients experienced at least 1 adverse event (AEs), although nearly all were grade 1 or 2.

The most common treatment-related AEs were local injection-site reactions and flu-like symptoms, including fever, chills, and myalgia (n=11 for all 3). However, the researchers said these AEs were primarily short-lived and controlled by over-the-counter acetaminophen in most cases.

In the 8 mg dosing cohort, 1 patient had grade 3 neutropenia and 2 had grade 3 malaise, all of which were considered treatment-related. In addition, there was a case of grade 3 asymptomatic pulmonary embolism in the 4 mg dose cohort, which was deemed serious but unrelated to treatment.

Efficacy

The researchers observed induction of interferon-responsive genes at all dose levels 24 hours after the second dose of SD-101 was given (Day 9).

In addition, T-cell numbers increased at the treated site by Day 8. The total T cells increased in 7 of 10 evaluable patients by Day 8 (range, >300% to 18%).

CD4+ and CD8+ T cells increased simultaneously in 5 of 7 evaluable patients, regulatory T cells decreased in 8 of 10 evaluable patients by Day 8, and follicular T helper cells decreased in 9 of 9 evaluable patients by Day 8.

Furthermore, treated and untreated tumors decreased in volume across all dose groups.

At Day 90, 12 patients had a reduction of the product of diameters in treated tumors (median -45.3%; range, -87 to +100), and 11 patients had a reduction in untreated tumors (median -8.1%; range, -48 to +45).

In 9 patients, these abscopal effects were sustained for at least 180 to 360 days.

However, 6 patients discontinued from the study due to progression. Three had radiographic progression—1 at Day 92 (in the 4 mg cohort) and 2 at 1 year (1 in the 1 mg cohort and 1 in the 2 mg cohort).

Two patients had clinical progression—1 at Day 197 (4 mg) and 1 at Day 273 (2 mg). And 1 patient discontinued at Day 203 due to a combination of clinical and radiographic progression (8 mg).

The researchers pointed out that there was no evidence of a dose response with SD-101, but the study included a limited number of patients.

 

 

Micrograph showing

follicular lymphoma

 

NEW ORLEANS—The TLR9 agonist SD-101 has produced encouraging early results in patients with low-grade B-cell lymphoma, according to researchers.

In an ongoing phase 1/2 study, patients received low-dose radiation, followed by an injection of SD-101 into one of their tumors.

This prompted changes in the tumor microenvironment that potentially induced a systemic antitumor response and decreased the volume of both treated and untreated tumors.

In addition, SD-101 was considered well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities or maximum-tolerated dose.

“We are pleased to have already demonstrated a safety profile, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy in this study,” said Ronald Levy, MD, of Stanford University in California.

Dr Levy and his colleagues presented these results at the 2016 AACR Annual Meeting (abstract CT047). The study is sponsored by Dynavax Technologies Corporation, the company developing SD-101.

The researchers reported data for 13 patients with untreated, low-grade B-cell lymphoma. They had a mean age of 63.2, and 53.8% were male.

Patients had follicular lymphoma (n=9), small lymphocytic lymphoma (n=2), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n=1), and nodal marginal zone lymphoma (n=1).

At least 2 sites of measurable disease were required for participation in this study. One site was treated with low-dose radiation (2 Gy) and injected with SD-101 on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29. Other lesions received no treatment.

In Part 1—the dose-escalation portion of the study—patients received SD-101 at 1 mg (n=3), 2 mg (n=3), 4 mg (n=3), or 8 mg (n=4). The phase 2 expansion portion of the study is ongoing, with enrollment in 2 dose cohorts (1 mg and 8 mg).

“This clinical trial design is unique and takes advantage of the fact that lymphoma patients have easily injectable sites of disease,” Dr Levy said. “The local injections are conveniently added to low-dose radiotherapy, a standard treatment for low-grade lymphoma.”

Safety

All 13 patients experienced at least 1 adverse event (AEs), although nearly all were grade 1 or 2.

The most common treatment-related AEs were local injection-site reactions and flu-like symptoms, including fever, chills, and myalgia (n=11 for all 3). However, the researchers said these AEs were primarily short-lived and controlled by over-the-counter acetaminophen in most cases.

In the 8 mg dosing cohort, 1 patient had grade 3 neutropenia and 2 had grade 3 malaise, all of which were considered treatment-related. In addition, there was a case of grade 3 asymptomatic pulmonary embolism in the 4 mg dose cohort, which was deemed serious but unrelated to treatment.

Efficacy

The researchers observed induction of interferon-responsive genes at all dose levels 24 hours after the second dose of SD-101 was given (Day 9).

In addition, T-cell numbers increased at the treated site by Day 8. The total T cells increased in 7 of 10 evaluable patients by Day 8 (range, >300% to 18%).

CD4+ and CD8+ T cells increased simultaneously in 5 of 7 evaluable patients, regulatory T cells decreased in 8 of 10 evaluable patients by Day 8, and follicular T helper cells decreased in 9 of 9 evaluable patients by Day 8.

Furthermore, treated and untreated tumors decreased in volume across all dose groups.

At Day 90, 12 patients had a reduction of the product of diameters in treated tumors (median -45.3%; range, -87 to +100), and 11 patients had a reduction in untreated tumors (median -8.1%; range, -48 to +45).

In 9 patients, these abscopal effects were sustained for at least 180 to 360 days.

However, 6 patients discontinued from the study due to progression. Three had radiographic progression—1 at Day 92 (in the 4 mg cohort) and 2 at 1 year (1 in the 1 mg cohort and 1 in the 2 mg cohort).

Two patients had clinical progression—1 at Day 197 (4 mg) and 1 at Day 273 (2 mg). And 1 patient discontinued at Day 203 due to a combination of clinical and radiographic progression (8 mg).

The researchers pointed out that there was no evidence of a dose response with SD-101, but the study included a limited number of patients.

Another oral, small-molecule therapy called CUDC-907 is emerging from phase I testing as a treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma and multiple myeloma.

The CUDC-907 dose to be used in phase II studies will be 60 mg on a 5-days-on/2-days-off dosing schedule, according to Dr. Anas Younes of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, and his colleagues. A dose-expansion trial of this dose is ongoing, and the drug appears to be useful in particular for patients with refractory and relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

WikimediaCommons/Copyright © 2011 Michael Bonert.

The researchers tested CUDC-907, which is designed to inhibit histone deacetylase and PI3K enzyme pathways, for overall safety and response in 44 patients at four cancer centers. All participants had lymphoma or multiple myeloma and were refractory to treatment or had relapsed after two or more previous regimens.

The 44 participants were sequentially assigned to 21-day cycles of CUDC-907: 10 to once daily, 12 to twice weekly, 15 to three times weekly, and 7 to daily for 5 days followed by a 2-day break. The maximum tolerated doses were 60 mg for the once-daily schedule, 150 mg for the twice-weekly schedule, 150 mg for the three-times-weekly schedule, and 60 mg for the 5-on/2-off schedule. At data cutoff, 37 of the 44 patients had discontinued CUDC-907 because of disease progression, Dr. Younes and his associates reported in a study published online (Lancet Oncol. 2016 Mar 31. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00584-7).

Four dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 3 of 40 evaluable patients. Grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 19 of 44 patients: 9 had thrombocytopenia, 3 had neutropenia, 3 had hyperglycemia. Adverse events led to dose reductions in six patients and treatment discontinuation in seven.

Of 37 response-evaluable patients, two had complete responses and three had partial responses. All five were seen in the subgroup of nine patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and three occurred in the five patients with transformed follicular disease. The 21 patients with stable disease included those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. This ongoing trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01742988.

The study was sponsored by Curis, the maker of CUDC-907, and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. Five of the 15 investigators are employees of Curis.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

Another oral, small-molecule therapy called CUDC-907 is emerging from phase I testing as a treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma and multiple myeloma.

The CUDC-907 dose to be used in phase II studies will be 60 mg on a 5-days-on/2-days-off dosing schedule, according to Dr. Anas Younes of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, and his colleagues. A dose-expansion trial of this dose is ongoing, and the drug appears to be useful in particular for patients with refractory and relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

WikimediaCommons/Copyright © 2011 Michael Bonert.

The researchers tested CUDC-907, which is designed to inhibit histone deacetylase and PI3K enzyme pathways, for overall safety and response in 44 patients at four cancer centers. All participants had lymphoma or multiple myeloma and were refractory to treatment or had relapsed after two or more previous regimens.

The 44 participants were sequentially assigned to 21-day cycles of CUDC-907: 10 to once daily, 12 to twice weekly, 15 to three times weekly, and 7 to daily for 5 days followed by a 2-day break. The maximum tolerated doses were 60 mg for the once-daily schedule, 150 mg for the twice-weekly schedule, 150 mg for the three-times-weekly schedule, and 60 mg for the 5-on/2-off schedule. At data cutoff, 37 of the 44 patients had discontinued CUDC-907 because of disease progression, Dr. Younes and his associates reported in a study published online (Lancet Oncol. 2016 Mar 31. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00584-7).

Four dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 3 of 40 evaluable patients. Grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 19 of 44 patients: 9 had thrombocytopenia, 3 had neutropenia, 3 had hyperglycemia. Adverse events led to dose reductions in six patients and treatment discontinuation in seven.

Of 37 response-evaluable patients, two had complete responses and three had partial responses. All five were seen in the subgroup of nine patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and three occurred in the five patients with transformed follicular disease. The 21 patients with stable disease included those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. This ongoing trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01742988.

The study was sponsored by Curis, the maker of CUDC-907, and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. Five of the 15 investigators are employees of Curis.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

Another oral, small-molecule therapy called CUDC-907 is emerging from phase I testing as a treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma and multiple myeloma.

The CUDC-907 dose to be used in phase II studies will be 60 mg on a 5-days-on/2-days-off dosing schedule, according to Dr. Anas Younes of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, and his colleagues. A dose-expansion trial of this dose is ongoing, and the drug appears to be useful in particular for patients with refractory and relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

WikimediaCommons/Copyright © 2011 Michael Bonert.

The researchers tested CUDC-907, which is designed to inhibit histone deacetylase and PI3K enzyme pathways, for overall safety and response in 44 patients at four cancer centers. All participants had lymphoma or multiple myeloma and were refractory to treatment or had relapsed after two or more previous regimens.

The 44 participants were sequentially assigned to 21-day cycles of CUDC-907: 10 to once daily, 12 to twice weekly, 15 to three times weekly, and 7 to daily for 5 days followed by a 2-day break. The maximum tolerated doses were 60 mg for the once-daily schedule, 150 mg for the twice-weekly schedule, 150 mg for the three-times-weekly schedule, and 60 mg for the 5-on/2-off schedule. At data cutoff, 37 of the 44 patients had discontinued CUDC-907 because of disease progression, Dr. Younes and his associates reported in a study published online (Lancet Oncol. 2016 Mar 31. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00584-7).

Four dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 3 of 40 evaluable patients. Grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 19 of 44 patients: 9 had thrombocytopenia, 3 had neutropenia, 3 had hyperglycemia. Adverse events led to dose reductions in six patients and treatment discontinuation in seven.

Of 37 response-evaluable patients, two had complete responses and three had partial responses. All five were seen in the subgroup of nine patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and three occurred in the five patients with transformed follicular disease. The 21 patients with stable disease included those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. This ongoing trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01742988.

The study was sponsored by Curis, the maker of CUDC-907, and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. Five of the 15 investigators are employees of Curis.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

 

 

Micrograph showing DLBCL

 

The small-molecule inhibitor CUDC-907 can provide disease control in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma and multiple myeloma (MM), according to researchers.

In a phase 1 trial, CUDC-907 produced responses in a small number of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

And more than half of patients had stable disease while on CUDC-907, including those with MM, DLBCL, Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and other lymphomas.

However, a majority of patients in this trial—84%—discontinued treatment due to confirmed progressive disease or signs of progression.

These results were published in The Lancet. The trial was sponsored by Curis, Inc., the company developing CUDC-907, and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society.

“The data from the phase 1 monotherapy trial for CUDC-907, especially in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL are very encouraging, and we look forward to data emerging from the current phase 2 trial in patients with MYC-altered DLBCL,” said study author Anas Younes, MD, of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, New York.

CUDC-907 is an oral, dual inhibitor of class I and II histone deacetylases (HDACs), as well as class I PI3K enzymes. Specifically, CUDC-907 is designed to inhibit HDACs 1, 2, 3, 6, and 10 and PI3K-alpha, delta, and beta isoforms.

Between Jan 23, 2013, and July 27, 2015, the phase 1 trial of CUDC-907 enrolled 44 patients who were refractory to or had relapsed after 2 or more previous regimens. The patients’ median age was 63 (range, 22-83), and they had received a median of 5 prior treatments (range, 2-10).

Four patients had MM, 12 had HL, and 12 had DLBCL. The remaining 16 patients had other types of lymphoma, including lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (n=3), small lymphocytic lymphoma (n=3), mantle cell lymphoma (n=3), follicular lymphoma (n=2), T-cell lymphoma (n=2), marginal zone lymphoma (n=1), Burkitt lymphoma (n=1), and gray zone lymphoma (n=1).

Treatment

CUDC-907 was given in a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design at 4 different dosing schedules—once daily, twice weekly, 3 times weekly, and daily for 5 days followed by a 2-day break (5/2)—in 21-day cycles.

Patients continued to receive CUDC-907 until disease progression or other treatment discontinuation criteria were met. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose.

Ten patients were sequentially assigned to CUDC-907 once-daily (MTD 60 mg), 12 to twice-weekly (MTD 150 mg), 15 to 3-times-weekly (MTD 150 mg), and 7 to the 5/2 dosing schedule (MTD 60 mg).

Safety

Four dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred in 3 of 40 DLT-evaluable patients. The DLTs were diarrhea and hyperglycemia in 1 patient on 60 mg once daily, hyperglycemia in 1 patient on 150 mg twice weekly, and diarrhea in 1 patient on 150 mg 3 times weekly. There were no DLTs in patients on the 5/2 schedule.

The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) was 43% (19/44). The most common of these AEs were thrombocytopenia (20%, n=9), neutropenia (7%, n=3), and hyperglycemia (7%, n=3).

Twenty-five percent of patients (11/44) had serious AEs. Three of these events were considered treatment-related. They were epistaxis and the DLTs of diarrhea and hyperglycemia.

AEs led to dose reductions in 6 patients (14%) and treatment discontinuation in 7 patients (16%).

Efficacy

Thirty-seven patients were evaluable for response, and 5 of these patients responded (14%). All responses—2 complete and 3 partial responses—occurred in patients with DLBCL.

Twenty-one of the response-evaluable patients (57%) had stable disease. This included 1 patient with DLBCL, 2 with MM, 8 with HL, and 10 with the “other” types of lymphoma.

The remaining 11 patients progressed (30%)—3 with DLBCL, 2 with MM, 2 with HL, and 4 with other lymphomas.

Thirty-seven patients (84%) discontinued CUDC-907 because of progressive disease or clinical signs of progressive disease at the data cutoff.

Based on the clinical activity of CUDC-907 in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, particularly those with MYC alterations, Curis has initiated a phase 2 trial of the drug in these patients. The recommended phase 2 dose is 60 mg on the 5/2 dosing schedule.

 

 

Micrograph showing DLBCL

 

The small-molecule inhibitor CUDC-907 can provide disease control in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma and multiple myeloma (MM), according to researchers.

In a phase 1 trial, CUDC-907 produced responses in a small number of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

And more than half of patients had stable disease while on CUDC-907, including those with MM, DLBCL, Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and other lymphomas.

However, a majority of patients in this trial—84%—discontinued treatment due to confirmed progressive disease or signs of progression.

These results were published in The Lancet. The trial was sponsored by Curis, Inc., the company developing CUDC-907, and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society.

“The data from the phase 1 monotherapy trial for CUDC-907, especially in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL are very encouraging, and we look forward to data emerging from the current phase 2 trial in patients with MYC-altered DLBCL,” said study author Anas Younes, MD, of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, New York.

CUDC-907 is an oral, dual inhibitor of class I and II histone deacetylases (HDACs), as well as class I PI3K enzymes. Specifically, CUDC-907 is designed to inhibit HDACs 1, 2, 3, 6, and 10 and PI3K-alpha, delta, and beta isoforms.

Between Jan 23, 2013, and July 27, 2015, the phase 1 trial of CUDC-907 enrolled 44 patients who were refractory to or had relapsed after 2 or more previous regimens. The patients’ median age was 63 (range, 22-83), and they had received a median of 5 prior treatments (range, 2-10).

Four patients had MM, 12 had HL, and 12 had DLBCL. The remaining 16 patients had other types of lymphoma, including lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (n=3), small lymphocytic lymphoma (n=3), mantle cell lymphoma (n=3), follicular lymphoma (n=2), T-cell lymphoma (n=2), marginal zone lymphoma (n=1), Burkitt lymphoma (n=1), and gray zone lymphoma (n=1).

Treatment

CUDC-907 was given in a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design at 4 different dosing schedules—once daily, twice weekly, 3 times weekly, and daily for 5 days followed by a 2-day break (5/2)—in 21-day cycles.

Patients continued to receive CUDC-907 until disease progression or other treatment discontinuation criteria were met. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose.

Ten patients were sequentially assigned to CUDC-907 once-daily (MTD 60 mg), 12 to twice-weekly (MTD 150 mg), 15 to 3-times-weekly (MTD 150 mg), and 7 to the 5/2 dosing schedule (MTD 60 mg).

Safety

Four dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred in 3 of 40 DLT-evaluable patients. The DLTs were diarrhea and hyperglycemia in 1 patient on 60 mg once daily, hyperglycemia in 1 patient on 150 mg twice weekly, and diarrhea in 1 patient on 150 mg 3 times weekly. There were no DLTs in patients on the 5/2 schedule.

The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) was 43% (19/44). The most common of these AEs were thrombocytopenia (20%, n=9), neutropenia (7%, n=3), and hyperglycemia (7%, n=3).

Twenty-five percent of patients (11/44) had serious AEs. Three of these events were considered treatment-related. They were epistaxis and the DLTs of diarrhea and hyperglycemia.

AEs led to dose reductions in 6 patients (14%) and treatment discontinuation in 7 patients (16%).

Efficacy

Thirty-seven patients were evaluable for response, and 5 of these patients responded (14%). All responses—2 complete and 3 partial responses—occurred in patients with DLBCL.

Twenty-one of the response-evaluable patients (57%) had stable disease. This included 1 patient with DLBCL, 2 with MM, 8 with HL, and 10 with the “other” types of lymphoma.

The remaining 11 patients progressed (30%)—3 with DLBCL, 2 with MM, 2 with HL, and 4 with other lymphomas.

Thirty-seven patients (84%) discontinued CUDC-907 because of progressive disease or clinical signs of progressive disease at the data cutoff.

Based on the clinical activity of CUDC-907 in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, particularly those with MYC alterations, Curis has initiated a phase 2 trial of the drug in these patients. The recommended phase 2 dose is 60 mg on the 5/2 dosing schedule.

 

 

Micrograph showing DLBCL

 

The small-molecule inhibitor CUDC-907 can provide disease control in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma and multiple myeloma (MM), according to researchers.

In a phase 1 trial, CUDC-907 produced responses in a small number of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

And more than half of patients had stable disease while on CUDC-907, including those with MM, DLBCL, Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and other lymphomas.

However, a majority of patients in this trial—84%—discontinued treatment due to confirmed progressive disease or signs of progression.

These results were published in The Lancet. The trial was sponsored by Curis, Inc., the company developing CUDC-907, and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society.

“The data from the phase 1 monotherapy trial for CUDC-907, especially in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL are very encouraging, and we look forward to data emerging from the current phase 2 trial in patients with MYC-altered DLBCL,” said study author Anas Younes, MD, of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, New York.

CUDC-907 is an oral, dual inhibitor of class I and II histone deacetylases (HDACs), as well as class I PI3K enzymes. Specifically, CUDC-907 is designed to inhibit HDACs 1, 2, 3, 6, and 10 and PI3K-alpha, delta, and beta isoforms.

Between Jan 23, 2013, and July 27, 2015, the phase 1 trial of CUDC-907 enrolled 44 patients who were refractory to or had relapsed after 2 or more previous regimens. The patients’ median age was 63 (range, 22-83), and they had received a median of 5 prior treatments (range, 2-10).

Four patients had MM, 12 had HL, and 12 had DLBCL. The remaining 16 patients had other types of lymphoma, including lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (n=3), small lymphocytic lymphoma (n=3), mantle cell lymphoma (n=3), follicular lymphoma (n=2), T-cell lymphoma (n=2), marginal zone lymphoma (n=1), Burkitt lymphoma (n=1), and gray zone lymphoma (n=1).

Treatment

CUDC-907 was given in a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design at 4 different dosing schedules—once daily, twice weekly, 3 times weekly, and daily for 5 days followed by a 2-day break (5/2)—in 21-day cycles.

Patients continued to receive CUDC-907 until disease progression or other treatment discontinuation criteria were met. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose.

Ten patients were sequentially assigned to CUDC-907 once-daily (MTD 60 mg), 12 to twice-weekly (MTD 150 mg), 15 to 3-times-weekly (MTD 150 mg), and 7 to the 5/2 dosing schedule (MTD 60 mg).

Safety

Four dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred in 3 of 40 DLT-evaluable patients. The DLTs were diarrhea and hyperglycemia in 1 patient on 60 mg once daily, hyperglycemia in 1 patient on 150 mg twice weekly, and diarrhea in 1 patient on 150 mg 3 times weekly. There were no DLTs in patients on the 5/2 schedule.

The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) was 43% (19/44). The most common of these AEs were thrombocytopenia (20%, n=9), neutropenia (7%, n=3), and hyperglycemia (7%, n=3).

Twenty-five percent of patients (11/44) had serious AEs. Three of these events were considered treatment-related. They were epistaxis and the DLTs of diarrhea and hyperglycemia.

AEs led to dose reductions in 6 patients (14%) and treatment discontinuation in 7 patients (16%).

Efficacy

Thirty-seven patients were evaluable for response, and 5 of these patients responded (14%). All responses—2 complete and 3 partial responses—occurred in patients with DLBCL.

Twenty-one of the response-evaluable patients (57%) had stable disease. This included 1 patient with DLBCL, 2 with MM, 8 with HL, and 10 with the “other” types of lymphoma.

The remaining 11 patients progressed (30%)—3 with DLBCL, 2 with MM, 2 with HL, and 4 with other lymphomas.

Thirty-seven patients (84%) discontinued CUDC-907 because of progressive disease or clinical signs of progressive disease at the data cutoff.

Based on the clinical activity of CUDC-907 in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, particularly those with MYC alterations, Curis has initiated a phase 2 trial of the drug in these patients. The recommended phase 2 dose is 60 mg on the 5/2 dosing schedule.

 

 

Follicular lymphoma

 

Blinatumomab, a CD19/CD3 bispecific T-cell engager antibody construct, can produce durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to a phase 1 study.

Among patients who received the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of blinatumomab, the overall response rate (ORR) was nearly 70%, and the median duration of response was more than 400 days.

However, there was a high rate of neurologic events, particularly among patients who received higher doses of the drug.

Ralph Bargou, MD, of Wuerzburg University Hospital in Germany, and his colleagues conducted this study and reported the results in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The study was supported by Amgen (and Micromet before its acquisition by Amgen), the companies developing blinatumomab.

The study enrolled 76 patients with relapsed/refractory NHL. Most patients (n=52) had indolent NHL. Subtypes included follicular lymphoma (FL, n=28), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL, n=24), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, n=14), and “other” (n=10).

The “other” category included lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (n=2), small lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (n=1), immunocytoma (n=1), Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia (n=1), marginal zone NHL (n=1), marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (n=1), marginal zone lymphoma (n=1), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n=1), and small lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n=1).

The patients’ median age was 65 (range, 20-80), and the median number of prior treatment regimens was 3 (range, 1-10).

Dosing, toxicity, and discontinuation

This phase 1, dose-escalation study had a 3 + 3 design. Blinatumomab was given over 4 or 8 weeks at 7 different dose levels, ranging from 0.5 μg/m²/day to 90 μg/m²/day.

The researchers found that neurologic events were dose-limiting, and 60 μg/m²/day was the MTD.

Five patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities, including a grade 2 mental disorder (15 μg/m²/day), a case of grade 4 metabolic acidosis due to grand mal seizure (30 μg/m²/day), 2 cases of grade 3 encephalopathy (90 μg/m²/day), and 1 case of grade 3 seizure and aphasia (90 μg/m²/day).

Forty-two patients received treatment in the formal dose-escalation phase. Thirty-four additional patients were recruited to evaluate the antilymphoma activity of blinatumomab and test strategies for mitigating neurologic events at the MTD.

The researchers found that stepwise dosing (5 μg/m²/day to 60 μg/m²/day) plus pentosan polysulfate SP54 (n=3) prompted no treatment discontinuations.

However, single-step (n=5) dosing led to 2 discontinuations, and double-step (n=24) dosing led to 7 discontinuations. All were due to neurologic events.

The most clinically relevant adverse events were neurologic in nature. The overall incidence of these events, regardless of causality, was 71%. The incidence of grade 3 neurologic events was 22%.

Twenty percent of patients experienced serious neurologic events, including encephalopathy (8%), aphasia (4%), and headache (3%). There were no grade 4 or 5 neurologic events.

Response

Among patients treated at the MTD (60 μg/m²/day), the ORR was 69% (24/35). The ORR was 50% at 90 μg/m²/day (2/4), 20% at 15 μg/m²/day (3/15), and 17% at 30 μg/m²/day (1/6).

Complete responses (CRs) occurred in 1 patient at the 15 μg/m²/day dose, 1 at the 30 μg/m²/day dose, 1 at the 90 μg/m²/day dose, and 8 at the 60 μg/m²/day dose. Unconfirmed CRs (CRus) occurred in 5 patients at the 60 μg/m²/day dose.

Among patients who received the MTD, the ORR was 80% in FL patients, 71% in MCL patients, 55% in DLBCL patients, and 50% in the “other” category. There were 6 CR/CRus among FL patients, 3 CR/CRus among MCL patients, and 4 CR/CRus among DLBCL patients.

The median duration of response for patients who received the MTD was 404 days (95% CI, 207 to 1129). The median duration of CR/CRu was 508 days (95% CI, 213 to not estimable). And the median duration of partial response was 185 days (95% CI, 28 to 754).

Nine patients were still in remission at the time of the analysis, and 12 patients had remissions lasting more than 1 year.

“Blinatumomab continues to demonstrate a long duration of response in heavily pretreated non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients,” Dr Bargou said. “Results of the expanded phase 1 experience suggest that blinatumomab has the potential to alter the clinical course of disease in patients with a variety of NHL subtypes.”

 

 

Follicular lymphoma

 

Blinatumomab, a CD19/CD3 bispecific T-cell engager antibody construct, can produce durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to a phase 1 study.

Among patients who received the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of blinatumomab, the overall response rate (ORR) was nearly 70%, and the median duration of response was more than 400 days.

However, there was a high rate of neurologic events, particularly among patients who received higher doses of the drug.

Ralph Bargou, MD, of Wuerzburg University Hospital in Germany, and his colleagues conducted this study and reported the results in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The study was supported by Amgen (and Micromet before its acquisition by Amgen), the companies developing blinatumomab.

The study enrolled 76 patients with relapsed/refractory NHL. Most patients (n=52) had indolent NHL. Subtypes included follicular lymphoma (FL, n=28), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL, n=24), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, n=14), and “other” (n=10).

The “other” category included lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (n=2), small lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (n=1), immunocytoma (n=1), Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia (n=1), marginal zone NHL (n=1), marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (n=1), marginal zone lymphoma (n=1), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n=1), and small lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n=1).

The patients’ median age was 65 (range, 20-80), and the median number of prior treatment regimens was 3 (range, 1-10).

Dosing, toxicity, and discontinuation

This phase 1, dose-escalation study had a 3 + 3 design. Blinatumomab was given over 4 or 8 weeks at 7 different dose levels, ranging from 0.5 μg/m²/day to 90 μg/m²/day.

The researchers found that neurologic events were dose-limiting, and 60 μg/m²/day was the MTD.

Five patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities, including a grade 2 mental disorder (15 μg/m²/day), a case of grade 4 metabolic acidosis due to grand mal seizure (30 μg/m²/day), 2 cases of grade 3 encephalopathy (90 μg/m²/day), and 1 case of grade 3 seizure and aphasia (90 μg/m²/day).

Forty-two patients received treatment in the formal dose-escalation phase. Thirty-four additional patients were recruited to evaluate the antilymphoma activity of blinatumomab and test strategies for mitigating neurologic events at the MTD.

The researchers found that stepwise dosing (5 μg/m²/day to 60 μg/m²/day) plus pentosan polysulfate SP54 (n=3) prompted no treatment discontinuations.

However, single-step (n=5) dosing led to 2 discontinuations, and double-step (n=24) dosing led to 7 discontinuations. All were due to neurologic events.

The most clinically relevant adverse events were neurologic in nature. The overall incidence of these events, regardless of causality, was 71%. The incidence of grade 3 neurologic events was 22%.

Twenty percent of patients experienced serious neurologic events, including encephalopathy (8%), aphasia (4%), and headache (3%). There were no grade 4 or 5 neurologic events.

Response

Among patients treated at the MTD (60 μg/m²/day), the ORR was 69% (24/35). The ORR was 50% at 90 μg/m²/day (2/4), 20% at 15 μg/m²/day (3/15), and 17% at 30 μg/m²/day (1/6).

Complete responses (CRs) occurred in 1 patient at the 15 μg/m²/day dose, 1 at the 30 μg/m²/day dose, 1 at the 90 μg/m²/day dose, and 8 at the 60 μg/m²/day dose. Unconfirmed CRs (CRus) occurred in 5 patients at the 60 μg/m²/day dose.

Among patients who received the MTD, the ORR was 80% in FL patients, 71% in MCL patients, 55% in DLBCL patients, and 50% in the “other” category. There were 6 CR/CRus among FL patients, 3 CR/CRus among MCL patients, and 4 CR/CRus among DLBCL patients.

The median duration of response for patients who received the MTD was 404 days (95% CI, 207 to 1129). The median duration of CR/CRu was 508 days (95% CI, 213 to not estimable). And the median duration of partial response was 185 days (95% CI, 28 to 754).

Nine patients were still in remission at the time of the analysis, and 12 patients had remissions lasting more than 1 year.

“Blinatumomab continues to demonstrate a long duration of response in heavily pretreated non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients,” Dr Bargou said. “Results of the expanded phase 1 experience suggest that blinatumomab has the potential to alter the clinical course of disease in patients with a variety of NHL subtypes.”

 

 

Follicular lymphoma

 

Blinatumomab, a CD19/CD3 bispecific T-cell engager antibody construct, can produce durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to a phase 1 study.

Among patients who received the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of blinatumomab, the overall response rate (ORR) was nearly 70%, and the median duration of response was more than 400 days.

However, there was a high rate of neurologic events, particularly among patients who received higher doses of the drug.

Ralph Bargou, MD, of Wuerzburg University Hospital in Germany, and his colleagues conducted this study and reported the results in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The study was supported by Amgen (and Micromet before its acquisition by Amgen), the companies developing blinatumomab.

The study enrolled 76 patients with relapsed/refractory NHL. Most patients (n=52) had indolent NHL. Subtypes included follicular lymphoma (FL, n=28), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL, n=24), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, n=14), and “other” (n=10).

The “other” category included lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (n=2), small lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (n=1), immunocytoma (n=1), Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia (n=1), marginal zone NHL (n=1), marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (n=1), marginal zone lymphoma (n=1), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n=1), and small lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n=1).

The patients’ median age was 65 (range, 20-80), and the median number of prior treatment regimens was 3 (range, 1-10).

Dosing, toxicity, and discontinuation

This phase 1, dose-escalation study had a 3 + 3 design. Blinatumomab was given over 4 or 8 weeks at 7 different dose levels, ranging from 0.5 μg/m²/day to 90 μg/m²/day.

The researchers found that neurologic events were dose-limiting, and 60 μg/m²/day was the MTD.

Five patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities, including a grade 2 mental disorder (15 μg/m²/day), a case of grade 4 metabolic acidosis due to grand mal seizure (30 μg/m²/day), 2 cases of grade 3 encephalopathy (90 μg/m²/day), and 1 case of grade 3 seizure and aphasia (90 μg/m²/day).

Forty-two patients received treatment in the formal dose-escalation phase. Thirty-four additional patients were recruited to evaluate the antilymphoma activity of blinatumomab and test strategies for mitigating neurologic events at the MTD.

The researchers found that stepwise dosing (5 μg/m²/day to 60 μg/m²/day) plus pentosan polysulfate SP54 (n=3) prompted no treatment discontinuations.

However, single-step (n=5) dosing led to 2 discontinuations, and double-step (n=24) dosing led to 7 discontinuations. All were due to neurologic events.

The most clinically relevant adverse events were neurologic in nature. The overall incidence of these events, regardless of causality, was 71%. The incidence of grade 3 neurologic events was 22%.

Twenty percent of patients experienced serious neurologic events, including encephalopathy (8%), aphasia (4%), and headache (3%). There were no grade 4 or 5 neurologic events.

Response

Among patients treated at the MTD (60 μg/m²/day), the ORR was 69% (24/35). The ORR was 50% at 90 μg/m²/day (2/4), 20% at 15 μg/m²/day (3/15), and 17% at 30 μg/m²/day (1/6).

Complete responses (CRs) occurred in 1 patient at the 15 μg/m²/day dose, 1 at the 30 μg/m²/day dose, 1 at the 90 μg/m²/day dose, and 8 at the 60 μg/m²/day dose. Unconfirmed CRs (CRus) occurred in 5 patients at the 60 μg/m²/day dose.

Among patients who received the MTD, the ORR was 80% in FL patients, 71% in MCL patients, 55% in DLBCL patients, and 50% in the “other” category. There were 6 CR/CRus among FL patients, 3 CR/CRus among MCL patients, and 4 CR/CRus among DLBCL patients.

The median duration of response for patients who received the MTD was 404 days (95% CI, 207 to 1129). The median duration of CR/CRu was 508 days (95% CI, 213 to not estimable). And the median duration of partial response was 185 days (95% CI, 28 to 754).

Nine patients were still in remission at the time of the analysis, and 12 patients had remissions lasting more than 1 year.

“Blinatumomab continues to demonstrate a long duration of response in heavily pretreated non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients,” Dr Bargou said. “Results of the expanded phase 1 experience suggest that blinatumomab has the potential to alter the clinical course of disease in patients with a variety of NHL subtypes.”

 

 

Idelalisib (Zydelig)

Photo courtesy of

Gilead Sciences, Inc.

 

In light of recently reported safety concerns, the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) has issued provisional advice for doctors and patients using idelalisib (Zydelig).

The EMA recently began reviewing the safety of idelalisib because of serious adverse events, most of which were infection-related, that were reported in 3 clinical trials investigating idelalisib in combination with other drugs.

These trials have since been stopped.

Now, the PRAC is making provisional recommendations to ensure idelalisib is used as safely as possible outside of clinical trials.

These recommendations will be forwarded to the European Commission, which will issue a provisional legally binding decision applicable in all European Union (EU) member states.

In the EU, idelalisib is approved as monotherapy for adults with follicular lymphoma that is refractory to 2 prior lines of treatment.

Idelalisib is also approved for use in combination with rituximab to treat adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who have received at least 1 prior therapy or as first-line treatment in the presence of 17p deletion or TP53 mutation in CLL patients considered unsuitable for chemo-immunotherapy.

Recommendations

The PRAC is recommending that previously untreated CLL patients with 17p deletion or TP53 mutation do not begin treatment with idelalisib. In addition, doctors should re-evaluate each patient taking idelalisib as first-line treatment for CLL and only continue treatment if the benefits outweigh the risks.

Idelalisib can continue to be used in combination, only with rituximab, in CLL patients who have received at least 1 prior therapy and as monotherapy in patients with follicular lymphoma that is refractory to 2 lines of treatment.

Patients with any evidence of ongoing systemic infection should not be started on treatment with idelalisib.

And patients should be informed about the risk of serious infections with idelalisib.

All patients who do receive idelalisib should take antibiotics to prevent Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, and they should be monitored for respiratory signs and symptoms. Regular clinical and laboratory monitoring for cytomegalovirus infection is also recommended.

Patients should have regular blood tests to detect neutropenia. In case a patient has moderate or severe neutropenia, treatment with idelalisib may have to be interrupted, in line with the updated summary of product characteristics.

The EMA said further details on these provisional measures will be provided in writing to healthcare professionals, and the product information will be updated accordingly.

Likewise, further information on the review of idelalisib will be provided as necessary and once the review is finished.

About the review

The EMA’s review of idelalisib started after a higher rate of serious adverse events, including deaths, was seen in 3 clinical trials evaluating the addition of idelalisib to standard therapy in first-line CLL and relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

Most of the deaths were related to infections such as Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia and cytomegalovirus infection. Other excess deaths were related mainly to respiratory events.

The NHL studies (NCT01732926 and NCT01732913) included patients with disease characteristics different from those covered by the currently approved indication for idelalisib and investigated combinations of drugs that are not currently approved in the EU—idelalisib plus rituximab for NHL and idelalisib plus bendamustine and rituximab for NHL.

The CLL trial (NCT01980888) involved patients who had not received previous treatment, some of whom had the 17p deletion or TP53 mutation. However, the trial also investigated a combination of drugs not currently approved in the EU—idelalisib plus bendamustine and rituximab.

At present, the PRAC is conducting the review. Once the PRAC is finished, its recommendations will be forwarded to the EMA’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, which will adopt a final opinion.

The European Commission will take this opinion into account and adopt a legally binding decision that is applicable in all EU member states.

 

 

Idelalisib (Zydelig)

Photo courtesy of

Gilead Sciences, Inc.

 

In light of recently reported safety concerns, the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) has issued provisional advice for doctors and patients using idelalisib (Zydelig).

The EMA recently began reviewing the safety of idelalisib because of serious adverse events, most of which were infection-related, that were reported in 3 clinical trials investigating idelalisib in combination with other drugs.

These trials have since been stopped.

Now, the PRAC is making provisional recommendations to ensure idelalisib is used as safely as possible outside of clinical trials.

These recommendations will be forwarded to the European Commission, which will issue a provisional legally binding decision applicable in all European Union (EU) member states.

In the EU, idelalisib is approved as monotherapy for adults with follicular lymphoma that is refractory to 2 prior lines of treatment.

Idelalisib is also approved for use in combination with rituximab to treat adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who have received at least 1 prior therapy or as first-line treatment in the presence of 17p deletion or TP53 mutation in CLL patients considered unsuitable for chemo-immunotherapy.

Recommendations

The PRAC is recommending that previously untreated CLL patients with 17p deletion or TP53 mutation do not begin treatment with idelalisib. In addition, doctors should re-evaluate each patient taking idelalisib as first-line treatment for CLL and only continue treatment if the benefits outweigh the risks.

Idelalisib can continue to be used in combination, only with rituximab, in CLL patients who have received at least 1 prior therapy and as monotherapy in patients with follicular lymphoma that is refractory to 2 lines of treatment.

Patients with any evidence of ongoing systemic infection should not be started on treatment with idelalisib.

And patients should be informed about the risk of serious infections with idelalisib.

All patients who do receive idelalisib should take antibiotics to prevent Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, and they should be monitored for respiratory signs and symptoms. Regular clinical and laboratory monitoring for cytomegalovirus infection is also recommended.

Patients should have regular blood tests to detect neutropenia. In case a patient has moderate or severe neutropenia, treatment with idelalisib may have to be interrupted, in line with the updated summary of product characteristics.

The EMA said further details on these provisional measures will be provided in writing to healthcare professionals, and the product information will be updated accordingly.

Likewise, further information on the review of idelalisib will be provided as necessary and once the review is finished.

About the review

The EMA’s review of idelalisib started after a higher rate of serious adverse events, including deaths, was seen in 3 clinical trials evaluating the addition of idelalisib to standard therapy in first-line CLL and relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

Most of the deaths were related to infections such as Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia and cytomegalovirus infection. Other excess deaths were related mainly to respiratory events.

The NHL studies (NCT01732926 and NCT01732913) included patients with disease characteristics different from those covered by the currently approved indication for idelalisib and investigated combinations of drugs that are not currently approved in the EU—idelalisib plus rituximab for NHL and idelalisib plus bendamustine and rituximab for NHL.

The CLL trial (NCT01980888) involved patients who had not received previous treatment, some of whom had the 17p deletion or TP53 mutation. However, the trial also investigated a combination of drugs not currently approved in the EU—idelalisib plus bendamustine and rituximab.

At present, the PRAC is conducting the review. Once the PRAC is finished, its recommendations will be forwarded to the EMA’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, which will adopt a final opinion.

The European Commission will take this opinion into account and adopt a legally binding decision that is applicable in all EU member states.

 

 

Idelalisib (Zydelig)

Photo courtesy of

Gilead Sciences, Inc.

 

In light of recently reported safety concerns, the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) has issued provisional advice for doctors and patients using idelalisib (Zydelig).

The EMA recently began reviewing the safety of idelalisib because of serious adverse events, most of which were infection-related, that were reported in 3 clinical trials investigating idelalisib in combination with other drugs.

These trials have since been stopped.

Now, the PRAC is making provisional recommendations to ensure idelalisib is used as safely as possible outside of clinical trials.

These recommendations will be forwarded to the European Commission, which will issue a provisional legally binding decision applicable in all European Union (EU) member states.

In the EU, idelalisib is approved as monotherapy for adults with follicular lymphoma that is refractory to 2 prior lines of treatment.

Idelalisib is also approved for use in combination with rituximab to treat adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who have received at least 1 prior therapy or as first-line treatment in the presence of 17p deletion or TP53 mutation in CLL patients considered unsuitable for chemo-immunotherapy.

Recommendations

The PRAC is recommending that previously untreated CLL patients with 17p deletion or TP53 mutation do not begin treatment with idelalisib. In addition, doctors should re-evaluate each patient taking idelalisib as first-line treatment for CLL and only continue treatment if the benefits outweigh the risks.

Idelalisib can continue to be used in combination, only with rituximab, in CLL patients who have received at least 1 prior therapy and as monotherapy in patients with follicular lymphoma that is refractory to 2 lines of treatment.

Patients with any evidence of ongoing systemic infection should not be started on treatment with idelalisib.

And patients should be informed about the risk of serious infections with idelalisib.

All patients who do receive idelalisib should take antibiotics to prevent Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, and they should be monitored for respiratory signs and symptoms. Regular clinical and laboratory monitoring for cytomegalovirus infection is also recommended.

Patients should have regular blood tests to detect neutropenia. In case a patient has moderate or severe neutropenia, treatment with idelalisib may have to be interrupted, in line with the updated summary of product characteristics.

The EMA said further details on these provisional measures will be provided in writing to healthcare professionals, and the product information will be updated accordingly.

Likewise, further information on the review of idelalisib will be provided as necessary and once the review is finished.

About the review

The EMA’s review of idelalisib started after a higher rate of serious adverse events, including deaths, was seen in 3 clinical trials evaluating the addition of idelalisib to standard therapy in first-line CLL and relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

Most of the deaths were related to infections such as Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia and cytomegalovirus infection. Other excess deaths were related mainly to respiratory events.

The NHL studies (NCT01732926 and NCT01732913) included patients with disease characteristics different from those covered by the currently approved indication for idelalisib and investigated combinations of drugs that are not currently approved in the EU—idelalisib plus rituximab for NHL and idelalisib plus bendamustine and rituximab for NHL.

The CLL trial (NCT01980888) involved patients who had not received previous treatment, some of whom had the 17p deletion or TP53 mutation. However, the trial also investigated a combination of drugs not currently approved in the EU—idelalisib plus bendamustine and rituximab.

At present, the PRAC is conducting the review. Once the PRAC is finished, its recommendations will be forwarded to the EMA’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, which will adopt a final opinion.

The European Commission will take this opinion into account and adopt a legally binding decision that is applicable in all EU member states.

An increased rate of adverse events, including deaths, have been reported in clinical trials with idelalisib (Zydelig) in combination with other cancer medicines, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced.

Gilead Sciences, Inc. has confirmed that they are stopping six clinical trials in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, small lymphocytic lymphoma and indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas. The FDA is reviewing the findings of the clinical trials and will communicate new information as necessary, according to the FDA press release.

Idelalisib is not approved for previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. It is approved by the FDA for the treatment of:

• Relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia, in combination with rituximab, in patients for whom rituximab alone would be considered appropriate therapy due to other co-morbidities.

• Relapsed follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies.

• Relapsed small lymphocytic lymphoma in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies.

Adverse events involving idelalisib should be reported to the FDA MedWatch program, the release advised.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

An increased rate of adverse events, including deaths, have been reported in clinical trials with idelalisib (Zydelig) in combination with other cancer medicines, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced.

Gilead Sciences, Inc. has confirmed that they are stopping six clinical trials in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, small lymphocytic lymphoma and indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas. The FDA is reviewing the findings of the clinical trials and will communicate new information as necessary, according to the FDA press release.

Idelalisib is not approved for previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. It is approved by the FDA for the treatment of:

• Relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia, in combination with rituximab, in patients for whom rituximab alone would be considered appropriate therapy due to other co-morbidities.

• Relapsed follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies.

• Relapsed small lymphocytic lymphoma in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies.

Adverse events involving idelalisib should be reported to the FDA MedWatch program, the release advised.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

An increased rate of adverse events, including deaths, have been reported in clinical trials with idelalisib (Zydelig) in combination with other cancer medicines, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced.

Gilead Sciences, Inc. has confirmed that they are stopping six clinical trials in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, small lymphocytic lymphoma and indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas. The FDA is reviewing the findings of the clinical trials and will communicate new information as necessary, according to the FDA press release.

Idelalisib is not approved for previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. It is approved by the FDA for the treatment of:

• Relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia, in combination with rituximab, in patients for whom rituximab alone would be considered appropriate therapy due to other co-morbidities.

• Relapsed follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies.

• Relapsed small lymphocytic lymphoma in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies.

Adverse events involving idelalisib should be reported to the FDA MedWatch program, the release advised.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

 

 

Idelalisib (Zydelig)

Photo courtesy of

Gilead Sciences, Inc.

 

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is reviewing the safety of idelalisib (Zydelig), a drug approved to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and follicular lymphoma in the European Union (EU).

The European Commission (EC) requested the review because of serious adverse events (AEs), including deaths, reported in 3 clinical trials investigating idelalisib in combination with other drugs.

The AEs were mostly infection-related.

The EMA is reviewing data from these studies to assess whether the findings have any consequences for the authorized uses of idelalisib.

In the meantime, the EMA advises that patients starting or already on treatment with idelalisib be carefully monitored for signs of infections. If the drug is well tolerated, treatment should not be stopped.

The EMA is considering whether any other immediate measures are necessary during the review period. The agency said it will communicate further and keep doctors and patients informed as appropriate.

About idelalisib

In the EU, idelalisib is approved for use in combination with rituximab to treat adults with CLL who have received at least 1 prior therapy or as first-line treatment in the presence of 17p deletion or TP53 mutation in CLL patients unsuitable for chemo-immunotherapy.

Idelalisib is also approved as monotherapy for adults with follicular lymphoma that is refractory to 2 prior lines of treatment.

About the trials

The trials in which patients have experienced serious AEs involve patients with CLL and indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

In one trial (NCT01732926), researchers are evaluating idelalisib in combination with bendamustine and rituximab for previously treated indolent NHL.

In another (NCT01732913), researchers are testing idelalisib in combination with rituximab for previously treated indolent NHL.

And in the third (NCT01980888), researchers are evaluating idelalisib in combination with bendamustine and rituximab in patients with previously untreated CLL.

The EMA noted that these studies are investigating combinations of drugs that are currently not approved in the EU and include patients with disease characteristics different from those covered by the approved indications for idelalisib.

About the review

The EMA has begun the review of idelalisib at the request of the EC, under Article 20 of Directive 2001/83/EC.

The review is being carried out by the EMA’s Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee, the committee responsible for the evaluation of safety issues for human medicines, which will make a set of recommendations.

Those recommendations will then be forwarded to the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, which is responsible for questions concerning medicines for human use and will adopt a final opinion on the safety of idelalisib.

The final stage of the review procedure is the EC’s adoption of a legally binding decision that is applicable in all EU member states.

 

 

Idelalisib (Zydelig)

Photo courtesy of

Gilead Sciences, Inc.

 

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is reviewing the safety of idelalisib (Zydelig), a drug approved to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and follicular lymphoma in the European Union (EU).

The European Commission (EC) requested the review because of serious adverse events (AEs), including deaths, reported in 3 clinical trials investigating idelalisib in combination with other drugs.

The AEs were mostly infection-related.

The EMA is reviewing data from these studies to assess whether the findings have any consequences for the authorized uses of idelalisib.

In the meantime, the EMA advises that patients starting or already on treatment with idelalisib be carefully monitored for signs of infections. If the drug is well tolerated, treatment should not be stopped.

The EMA is considering whether any other immediate measures are necessary during the review period. The agency said it will communicate further and keep doctors and patients informed as appropriate.

About idelalisib

In the EU, idelalisib is approved for use in combination with rituximab to treat adults with CLL who have received at least 1 prior therapy or as first-line treatment in the presence of 17p deletion or TP53 mutation in CLL patients unsuitable for chemo-immunotherapy.

Idelalisib is also approved as monotherapy for adults with follicular lymphoma that is refractory to 2 prior lines of treatment.

About the trials

The trials in which patients have experienced serious AEs involve patients with CLL and indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

In one trial (NCT01732926), researchers are evaluating idelalisib in combination with bendamustine and rituximab for previously treated indolent NHL.

In another (NCT01732913), researchers are testing idelalisib in combination with rituximab for previously treated indolent NHL.

And in the third (NCT01980888), researchers are evaluating idelalisib in combination with bendamustine and rituximab in patients with previously untreated CLL.

The EMA noted that these studies are investigating combinations of drugs that are currently not approved in the EU and include patients with disease characteristics different from those covered by the approved indications for idelalisib.

About the review

The EMA has begun the review of idelalisib at the request of the EC, under Article 20 of Directive 2001/83/EC.

The review is being carried out by the EMA’s Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee, the committee responsible for the evaluation of safety issues for human medicines, which will make a set of recommendations.

Those recommendations will then be forwarded to the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, which is responsible for questions concerning medicines for human use and will adopt a final opinion on the safety of idelalisib.

The final stage of the review procedure is the EC’s adoption of a legally binding decision that is applicable in all EU member states.

 

 

Idelalisib (Zydelig)

Photo courtesy of

Gilead Sciences, Inc.

 

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is reviewing the safety of idelalisib (Zydelig), a drug approved to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and follicular lymphoma in the European Union (EU).

The European Commission (EC) requested the review because of serious adverse events (AEs), including deaths, reported in 3 clinical trials investigating idelalisib in combination with other drugs.

The AEs were mostly infection-related.

The EMA is reviewing data from these studies to assess whether the findings have any consequences for the authorized uses of idelalisib.

In the meantime, the EMA advises that patients starting or already on treatment with idelalisib be carefully monitored for signs of infections. If the drug is well tolerated, treatment should not be stopped.

The EMA is considering whether any other immediate measures are necessary during the review period. The agency said it will communicate further and keep doctors and patients informed as appropriate.

About idelalisib

In the EU, idelalisib is approved for use in combination with rituximab to treat adults with CLL who have received at least 1 prior therapy or as first-line treatment in the presence of 17p deletion or TP53 mutation in CLL patients unsuitable for chemo-immunotherapy.

Idelalisib is also approved as monotherapy for adults with follicular lymphoma that is refractory to 2 prior lines of treatment.

About the trials

The trials in which patients have experienced serious AEs involve patients with CLL and indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

In one trial (NCT01732926), researchers are evaluating idelalisib in combination with bendamustine and rituximab for previously treated indolent NHL.

In another (NCT01732913), researchers are testing idelalisib in combination with rituximab for previously treated indolent NHL.

And in the third (NCT01980888), researchers are evaluating idelalisib in combination with bendamustine and rituximab in patients with previously untreated CLL.

The EMA noted that these studies are investigating combinations of drugs that are currently not approved in the EU and include patients with disease characteristics different from those covered by the approved indications for idelalisib.

About the review

The EMA has begun the review of idelalisib at the request of the EC, under Article 20 of Directive 2001/83/EC.

The review is being carried out by the EMA’s Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee, the committee responsible for the evaluation of safety issues for human medicines, which will make a set of recommendations.

Those recommendations will then be forwarded to the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, which is responsible for questions concerning medicines for human use and will adopt a final opinion on the safety of idelalisib.

The final stage of the review procedure is the EC’s adoption of a legally binding decision that is applicable in all EU member states.