Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Photo courtesy of Janssen

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for priority review a supplemental new drug application (sNDA) for ibrutinib (Imbruvica®) to be used in combination with rituximab in patients with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM).

The FDA intends to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

Ibrutinib is a first-in-class Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor jointly developed and commercialized by Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company, and Janssen Biotech, Inc.

Ibrutinib is already FDA-approved to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, previously treated mantle cell lymphoma, previously treated marginal zone lymphoma, previously treated chronic graft-versus-host disease, and WM.

If the new sNDA is approved, the use of ibrutinib in WM will extend beyond its current approved use as a single agent.

Phase 3 trial

The sNDA for ibrutinib and rituximab in WM is supported by data from the phase 3 iNNOVATE study. Results from this trial were presented at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 8003) and were simultaneously published in NEJM.

iNNOVATE is a placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study that enrolled 150 patients with relapsed/refractory and treatment-naïve WM.

All patients received rituximab at 375 mg/m² with weekly infusions at weeks 1 to 4 and 17 to 20. They also received either ibrutinib (420 mg) or placebo once daily continuously until criteria for permanent discontinuation were met.

Overall response rates were significantly higher in the ibrutinib arm than the placebo arm—92% and 47%, respectively (P<0.0001). Complete response rates were 3% and 1%, respectively.

The median time to next treatment was not reached for the ibrutinib arm and was 18 months for the placebo arm (hazard ratio=0.096; P<0.0001). Of the patients randomized to ibrutinib plus rituximab, 75% continued on treatment at last follow-up.

The 30-month progression-free survival rates were 82% in the ibrutinib arm and 28% in the placebo arm. The median progression-free survival was not reached in the ibrutinib arm and was 20.3 months in the placebo arm (hazard ratio=0.20; P<0.0001).

The 30-month overall survival rates were 94% in the ibrutinib arm and 92% in the placebo arm.

Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 60% of patients in the ibrutinib arm and 61% in the placebo arm.

Serious AEs occurred in 43% and 33% of patients, respectively. There were no fatal AEs in the ibrutinib arm and 3 in the rituximab arm.

Grade 3 or higher AEs that occurred more frequently in the ibrutinib arm than the placebo arm included atrial fibrillation (12% vs 1%) and hypertension (13% vs 4%).

AEs that occurred less frequently in the ibrutinib arm than the placebo arm included grade 3 or higher infusion reactions (1% vs 16%) and any-grade IgM flare (8% vs 47%).

Photo courtesy of Janssen

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for priority review a supplemental new drug application (sNDA) for ibrutinib (Imbruvica®) to be used in combination with rituximab in patients with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM).

The FDA intends to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

Ibrutinib is a first-in-class Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor jointly developed and commercialized by Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company, and Janssen Biotech, Inc.

Ibrutinib is already FDA-approved to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, previously treated mantle cell lymphoma, previously treated marginal zone lymphoma, previously treated chronic graft-versus-host disease, and WM.

If the new sNDA is approved, the use of ibrutinib in WM will extend beyond its current approved use as a single agent.

Phase 3 trial

The sNDA for ibrutinib and rituximab in WM is supported by data from the phase 3 iNNOVATE study. Results from this trial were presented at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 8003) and were simultaneously published in NEJM.

iNNOVATE is a placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study that enrolled 150 patients with relapsed/refractory and treatment-naïve WM.

All patients received rituximab at 375 mg/m² with weekly infusions at weeks 1 to 4 and 17 to 20. They also received either ibrutinib (420 mg) or placebo once daily continuously until criteria for permanent discontinuation were met.

Overall response rates were significantly higher in the ibrutinib arm than the placebo arm—92% and 47%, respectively (P<0.0001). Complete response rates were 3% and 1%, respectively.

The median time to next treatment was not reached for the ibrutinib arm and was 18 months for the placebo arm (hazard ratio=0.096; P<0.0001). Of the patients randomized to ibrutinib plus rituximab, 75% continued on treatment at last follow-up.

The 30-month progression-free survival rates were 82% in the ibrutinib arm and 28% in the placebo arm. The median progression-free survival was not reached in the ibrutinib arm and was 20.3 months in the placebo arm (hazard ratio=0.20; P<0.0001).

The 30-month overall survival rates were 94% in the ibrutinib arm and 92% in the placebo arm.

Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 60% of patients in the ibrutinib arm and 61% in the placebo arm.

Serious AEs occurred in 43% and 33% of patients, respectively. There were no fatal AEs in the ibrutinib arm and 3 in the rituximab arm.

Grade 3 or higher AEs that occurred more frequently in the ibrutinib arm than the placebo arm included atrial fibrillation (12% vs 1%) and hypertension (13% vs 4%).

AEs that occurred less frequently in the ibrutinib arm than the placebo arm included grade 3 or higher infusion reactions (1% vs 16%) and any-grade IgM flare (8% vs 47%).

Photo courtesy of Janssen

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for priority review a supplemental new drug application (sNDA) for ibrutinib (Imbruvica®) to be used in combination with rituximab in patients with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM).

The FDA intends to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

Ibrutinib is a first-in-class Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor jointly developed and commercialized by Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company, and Janssen Biotech, Inc.

Ibrutinib is already FDA-approved to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, previously treated mantle cell lymphoma, previously treated marginal zone lymphoma, previously treated chronic graft-versus-host disease, and WM.

If the new sNDA is approved, the use of ibrutinib in WM will extend beyond its current approved use as a single agent.

Phase 3 trial

The sNDA for ibrutinib and rituximab in WM is supported by data from the phase 3 iNNOVATE study. Results from this trial were presented at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 8003) and were simultaneously published in NEJM.

iNNOVATE is a placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study that enrolled 150 patients with relapsed/refractory and treatment-naïve WM.

All patients received rituximab at 375 mg/m² with weekly infusions at weeks 1 to 4 and 17 to 20. They also received either ibrutinib (420 mg) or placebo once daily continuously until criteria for permanent discontinuation were met.

Overall response rates were significantly higher in the ibrutinib arm than the placebo arm—92% and 47%, respectively (P<0.0001). Complete response rates were 3% and 1%, respectively.

The median time to next treatment was not reached for the ibrutinib arm and was 18 months for the placebo arm (hazard ratio=0.096; P<0.0001). Of the patients randomized to ibrutinib plus rituximab, 75% continued on treatment at last follow-up.

The 30-month progression-free survival rates were 82% in the ibrutinib arm and 28% in the placebo arm. The median progression-free survival was not reached in the ibrutinib arm and was 20.3 months in the placebo arm (hazard ratio=0.20; P<0.0001).

The 30-month overall survival rates were 94% in the ibrutinib arm and 92% in the placebo arm.

Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 60% of patients in the ibrutinib arm and 61% in the placebo arm.

Serious AEs occurred in 43% and 33% of patients, respectively. There were no fatal AEs in the ibrutinib arm and 3 in the rituximab arm.

Grade 3 or higher AEs that occurred more frequently in the ibrutinib arm than the placebo arm included atrial fibrillation (12% vs 1%) and hypertension (13% vs 4%).

AEs that occurred less frequently in the ibrutinib arm than the placebo arm included grade 3 or higher infusion reactions (1% vs 16%) and any-grade IgM flare (8% vs 47%).

©ASCO/Scott Morgan 2018

CHICAGO—A novel CD19-targeted T-cell therapy induced complete metabolic responses (CMRs) and no cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in patients with B-cell lymphomas in a first-in-human clinical study.

All subjects achieving CMR at the 1-month safety and efficacy assessment continued to show CMR at 3 months, investigators reported at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 3049*).

The therapy is built on a novel platform, ARTEMIS, designed to match the potency of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy but trigger less cytokine release when the target is engaged, investigators explained.

That platform is “potentially a major improvement” over existing CAR-T cell therapy, said Zhi Tao Ying, MD, of Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute in Beijing, China, and coauthors in a poster presented at ASCO.

The treatment, called ET190L1-ARTEMIS, utilizes the T-cell receptor platform and a proprietary human anti-CD19 antibody to target CD19-positive malignancies.

The investigators reported on 21 adults with CD-19 positive relapsed and refractory B-cell lymphomas who had received a median of 4 lines of previous therapy.

Patients received autologous ET190L1-ARTEMIS T cells in 1 of 3 dosing cohorts: 3 patients at 1 x 10⁶/kg, 13 at 3 x 10⁶/kg, and 5 at 6 x 10⁶/kg.

Of 17 patients completing a first-month efficacy assessment, 11 (65%) responded, including 7 CMRs and 3 partial responses. One patient had stable disease.

Seven of the 11 responders completed a third-month efficacy assessment, as of this analysis. Of 5 patients with CMR at month 1, all 5 maintained CMR at month 3. Likewise, 1 patient in partial response and 1 with stable disease at month 1 had the same response status at month 3.

There were no cases of CRS or neurotoxicity in 17 patients who completed the 1-month safety and efficacy assessment reported at ASCO. Grade 3 or greater adverse events in those subjects included lymphopenia in 17 (100%) and neutropenia in 5 (29%).

Eureka Therapeutics Inc., of Emeryville, California, is developing ET190L1-ARTEMIS. Co-investigators in this trial were from Eureka, Xi-An Jiaotong University in China, and Duke University School of Medicine in Durham, North Carolina.

A phase 1 trial of ET190L1-ARTEMIS in patients with relapsed and refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma has been initiated at Duke University, and  investigators say another US phase 1 trial including relapsed and refractory pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients will begin later this year. 

Data in the abstract differ from that presented in the poster.

©ASCO/Scott Morgan 2018

CHICAGO—A novel CD19-targeted T-cell therapy induced complete metabolic responses (CMRs) and no cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in patients with B-cell lymphomas in a first-in-human clinical study.

All subjects achieving CMR at the 1-month safety and efficacy assessment continued to show CMR at 3 months, investigators reported at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 3049*).

The therapy is built on a novel platform, ARTEMIS, designed to match the potency of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy but trigger less cytokine release when the target is engaged, investigators explained.

That platform is “potentially a major improvement” over existing CAR-T cell therapy, said Zhi Tao Ying, MD, of Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute in Beijing, China, and coauthors in a poster presented at ASCO.

The treatment, called ET190L1-ARTEMIS, utilizes the T-cell receptor platform and a proprietary human anti-CD19 antibody to target CD19-positive malignancies.

The investigators reported on 21 adults with CD-19 positive relapsed and refractory B-cell lymphomas who had received a median of 4 lines of previous therapy.

Patients received autologous ET190L1-ARTEMIS T cells in 1 of 3 dosing cohorts: 3 patients at 1 x 10⁶/kg, 13 at 3 x 10⁶/kg, and 5 at 6 x 10⁶/kg.

Of 17 patients completing a first-month efficacy assessment, 11 (65%) responded, including 7 CMRs and 3 partial responses. One patient had stable disease.

Seven of the 11 responders completed a third-month efficacy assessment, as of this analysis. Of 5 patients with CMR at month 1, all 5 maintained CMR at month 3. Likewise, 1 patient in partial response and 1 with stable disease at month 1 had the same response status at month 3.

There were no cases of CRS or neurotoxicity in 17 patients who completed the 1-month safety and efficacy assessment reported at ASCO. Grade 3 or greater adverse events in those subjects included lymphopenia in 17 (100%) and neutropenia in 5 (29%).

Eureka Therapeutics Inc., of Emeryville, California, is developing ET190L1-ARTEMIS. Co-investigators in this trial were from Eureka, Xi-An Jiaotong University in China, and Duke University School of Medicine in Durham, North Carolina.

A phase 1 trial of ET190L1-ARTEMIS in patients with relapsed and refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma has been initiated at Duke University, and  investigators say another US phase 1 trial including relapsed and refractory pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients will begin later this year. 

Data in the abstract differ from that presented in the poster.

©ASCO/Scott Morgan 2018

CHICAGO—A novel CD19-targeted T-cell therapy induced complete metabolic responses (CMRs) and no cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in patients with B-cell lymphomas in a first-in-human clinical study.

All subjects achieving CMR at the 1-month safety and efficacy assessment continued to show CMR at 3 months, investigators reported at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 3049*).

The therapy is built on a novel platform, ARTEMIS, designed to match the potency of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy but trigger less cytokine release when the target is engaged, investigators explained.

That platform is “potentially a major improvement” over existing CAR-T cell therapy, said Zhi Tao Ying, MD, of Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute in Beijing, China, and coauthors in a poster presented at ASCO.

The treatment, called ET190L1-ARTEMIS, utilizes the T-cell receptor platform and a proprietary human anti-CD19 antibody to target CD19-positive malignancies.

The investigators reported on 21 adults with CD-19 positive relapsed and refractory B-cell lymphomas who had received a median of 4 lines of previous therapy.

Patients received autologous ET190L1-ARTEMIS T cells in 1 of 3 dosing cohorts: 3 patients at 1 x 10⁶/kg, 13 at 3 x 10⁶/kg, and 5 at 6 x 10⁶/kg.

Of 17 patients completing a first-month efficacy assessment, 11 (65%) responded, including 7 CMRs and 3 partial responses. One patient had stable disease.

Seven of the 11 responders completed a third-month efficacy assessment, as of this analysis. Of 5 patients with CMR at month 1, all 5 maintained CMR at month 3. Likewise, 1 patient in partial response and 1 with stable disease at month 1 had the same response status at month 3.

There were no cases of CRS or neurotoxicity in 17 patients who completed the 1-month safety and efficacy assessment reported at ASCO. Grade 3 or greater adverse events in those subjects included lymphopenia in 17 (100%) and neutropenia in 5 (29%).

Eureka Therapeutics Inc., of Emeryville, California, is developing ET190L1-ARTEMIS. Co-investigators in this trial were from Eureka, Xi-An Jiaotong University in China, and Duke University School of Medicine in Durham, North Carolina.

A phase 1 trial of ET190L1-ARTEMIS in patients with relapsed and refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma has been initiated at Duke University, and  investigators say another US phase 1 trial including relapsed and refractory pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients will begin later this year. 

Data in the abstract differ from that presented in the poster.

Poster session at the 23rd Congress of the European Hematology Association

STOCKHOLM—The dual SYK/JAK inhibitor cerdulatinib has demonstrated efficacy in a phase 2 trial of patients with heavily pretreated B- and T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs).

There were a few deaths due to sepsis or septic shock that were considered related to cerdulatinib, but investigators have taken steps to prevent additional deaths.

Cerdulatinib produced responses in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and other NHLs.

The 5 deaths due to sepsis or septic shock (3 concomitant with pneumonia) occurred early on in the trial, and dose reductions, monitoring, and antibiotic prophylaxis appeared to be effective in preventing additional deaths.

Results from this trial were presented in a poster (abstract PF437) at the 23rd Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA).

The research was sponsored by Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

The trial enrolled 114 patients. They had FL (grade 1-3A; n=39), PTCL (n=25), CTCL (n=5), CLL/SLL (n=28), other indolent NHLs (Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia and marginal zone lymphoma; n=12), or aggressive NHL (defined as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL], grade 3B FL, mantle cell lymphoma, and transformed NHL with relapsed disease; n=5).

The patients’ median age was 68 (range, 34-93), and 59% were male. The median number of prior treatment regimens was 3 (range, 1-13), and 37% of patients had refractory disease.

Patients received cerdulatinib at 25, 30, or 35 mg twice daily (BID). A total of 101 patients were evaluable as of May 4, 2018.

Response

The objective response rate (ORR) was 47% in the entire population. Thirteen patients achieved a complete response (CR), and 34 had a partial response (PR). Thirty-four patients remained on cerdulatinib at the data cut-off.

The ORR was 46% in the FL patients, with 3 patients achieving a CR and 13 achieving a PR. Thirteen FL patients remained on cerdulatinib.

In the CLL/SLL patients, the ORR was 61%. Two patients had a CR, and 15 had a PR. Four CLL/SLL patients remained on cerdulatinib.

In PTCL, the ORR was 35%. All 7 responders had a CR. Eleven PTCL patients remained on cerdulatinib.

Only 1 CTCL patient was evaluable, but this patient achieved a CR and remained on cerdulatinib.

The ORR was 42% for patients with other indolent NHLs, with 5 PRs and no CRs. Only 1 patient in this group remained on cerdulatinib.

For aggressive NHL, the ORR was 20%, with 1 PR and no CRs. None of the patients in this group stayed on cerdulatinib.

“Cerdulatinib continues to demonstrate promising results across a wide range of B- and T-cell malignancies, including early indications of the potential for durable responses,” said study investigator Paul Hamlin, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, New York.

“The new signals in relapsed/refractory PTCL and CTCL are particularly compelling when you consider the limited treatment options for patients that fail frontline therapy.”

Safety

Grade 3 or higher adverse events included lipase increase (18%), neutropenia (17%), pneumonia/lung infection (11%), diarrhea (8%), fatigue (6%), amylase increase (5%), sepsis/septic shock (4%), hypertension (4%), anemia (4%), thrombocytopenia (4%), and hypophosphatemia (4%).

The 5 deaths due to sepsis or septic shock (3 of which were concomitant with pneumonia) were considered related to cerdulatinib. Three of the deaths occurred in patients with CLL, 1 in a DLBCL patient, and 1 in an FL patient.

“One of the things we have seen [with CLL patients] is the background infection rate is quite a bit higher,” said John T. Curnutte, MD, PhD, interim co-president and head of research and development at Portola Pharmaceuticals.

“You see this with multiple other agents, so we were not particularly surprised to see [sepsis/septic shock in CLL].”

Dr Curnutte noted that grade 5 sepsis/septic shock tended to occur in patients who were pre-colonized and/or had high plasma levels of cerdulatinib.

So, to prevent these adverse events, the starting dose of cerdulatinib was lowered, investigators began monitoring patients’ plasma levels, and all patients began receiving antibiotic prophylaxis. (Previously, only CLL patients had received this prophylaxis.)

The investigators found that lowering the starting dose from 35 mg BID to 30 mg or even 25 mg BID reduced plasma levels.

“At the 35 mg dose, 1 out of every 4 patients showed accumulation of the drug,” Dr Curnutte said. “In general, the use of the 30 mg BID or step-down 25 mg BID did not result in accumulation of drug.”

Dr Curnutte also noted that enrollment of CLL/SLL patients is complete, and investigators would be “very careful” if the study were to be re-opened to these patients.

For now, Portola is focused on completing enrollment in other patient groups on this phase 2 trial. The company is also hoping to conduct a phase 3 trial of cerdulatinib in PTCL that could begin as early as the end of this year.

Poster session at the 23rd Congress of the European Hematology Association

STOCKHOLM—The dual SYK/JAK inhibitor cerdulatinib has demonstrated efficacy in a phase 2 trial of patients with heavily pretreated B- and T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs).

There were a few deaths due to sepsis or septic shock that were considered related to cerdulatinib, but investigators have taken steps to prevent additional deaths.

Cerdulatinib produced responses in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and other NHLs.

The 5 deaths due to sepsis or septic shock (3 concomitant with pneumonia) occurred early on in the trial, and dose reductions, monitoring, and antibiotic prophylaxis appeared to be effective in preventing additional deaths.

Results from this trial were presented in a poster (abstract PF437) at the 23rd Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA).

The research was sponsored by Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

The trial enrolled 114 patients. They had FL (grade 1-3A; n=39), PTCL (n=25), CTCL (n=5), CLL/SLL (n=28), other indolent NHLs (Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia and marginal zone lymphoma; n=12), or aggressive NHL (defined as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL], grade 3B FL, mantle cell lymphoma, and transformed NHL with relapsed disease; n=5).

The patients’ median age was 68 (range, 34-93), and 59% were male. The median number of prior treatment regimens was 3 (range, 1-13), and 37% of patients had refractory disease.

Patients received cerdulatinib at 25, 30, or 35 mg twice daily (BID). A total of 101 patients were evaluable as of May 4, 2018.

Response

The objective response rate (ORR) was 47% in the entire population. Thirteen patients achieved a complete response (CR), and 34 had a partial response (PR). Thirty-four patients remained on cerdulatinib at the data cut-off.

The ORR was 46% in the FL patients, with 3 patients achieving a CR and 13 achieving a PR. Thirteen FL patients remained on cerdulatinib.

In the CLL/SLL patients, the ORR was 61%. Two patients had a CR, and 15 had a PR. Four CLL/SLL patients remained on cerdulatinib.

In PTCL, the ORR was 35%. All 7 responders had a CR. Eleven PTCL patients remained on cerdulatinib.

Only 1 CTCL patient was evaluable, but this patient achieved a CR and remained on cerdulatinib.

The ORR was 42% for patients with other indolent NHLs, with 5 PRs and no CRs. Only 1 patient in this group remained on cerdulatinib.

For aggressive NHL, the ORR was 20%, with 1 PR and no CRs. None of the patients in this group stayed on cerdulatinib.

“Cerdulatinib continues to demonstrate promising results across a wide range of B- and T-cell malignancies, including early indications of the potential for durable responses,” said study investigator Paul Hamlin, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, New York.

“The new signals in relapsed/refractory PTCL and CTCL are particularly compelling when you consider the limited treatment options for patients that fail frontline therapy.”

Safety

Grade 3 or higher adverse events included lipase increase (18%), neutropenia (17%), pneumonia/lung infection (11%), diarrhea (8%), fatigue (6%), amylase increase (5%), sepsis/septic shock (4%), hypertension (4%), anemia (4%), thrombocytopenia (4%), and hypophosphatemia (4%).

The 5 deaths due to sepsis or septic shock (3 of which were concomitant with pneumonia) were considered related to cerdulatinib. Three of the deaths occurred in patients with CLL, 1 in a DLBCL patient, and 1 in an FL patient.

“One of the things we have seen [with CLL patients] is the background infection rate is quite a bit higher,” said John T. Curnutte, MD, PhD, interim co-president and head of research and development at Portola Pharmaceuticals.

“You see this with multiple other agents, so we were not particularly surprised to see [sepsis/septic shock in CLL].”

Dr Curnutte noted that grade 5 sepsis/septic shock tended to occur in patients who were pre-colonized and/or had high plasma levels of cerdulatinib.

So, to prevent these adverse events, the starting dose of cerdulatinib was lowered, investigators began monitoring patients’ plasma levels, and all patients began receiving antibiotic prophylaxis. (Previously, only CLL patients had received this prophylaxis.)

The investigators found that lowering the starting dose from 35 mg BID to 30 mg or even 25 mg BID reduced plasma levels.

“At the 35 mg dose, 1 out of every 4 patients showed accumulation of the drug,” Dr Curnutte said. “In general, the use of the 30 mg BID or step-down 25 mg BID did not result in accumulation of drug.”

Dr Curnutte also noted that enrollment of CLL/SLL patients is complete, and investigators would be “very careful” if the study were to be re-opened to these patients.

For now, Portola is focused on completing enrollment in other patient groups on this phase 2 trial. The company is also hoping to conduct a phase 3 trial of cerdulatinib in PTCL that could begin as early as the end of this year.

Poster session at the 23rd Congress of the European Hematology Association

STOCKHOLM—The dual SYK/JAK inhibitor cerdulatinib has demonstrated efficacy in a phase 2 trial of patients with heavily pretreated B- and T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs).

There were a few deaths due to sepsis or septic shock that were considered related to cerdulatinib, but investigators have taken steps to prevent additional deaths.

Cerdulatinib produced responses in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and other NHLs.

The 5 deaths due to sepsis or septic shock (3 concomitant with pneumonia) occurred early on in the trial, and dose reductions, monitoring, and antibiotic prophylaxis appeared to be effective in preventing additional deaths.

Results from this trial were presented in a poster (abstract PF437) at the 23rd Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA).

The research was sponsored by Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

The trial enrolled 114 patients. They had FL (grade 1-3A; n=39), PTCL (n=25), CTCL (n=5), CLL/SLL (n=28), other indolent NHLs (Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia and marginal zone lymphoma; n=12), or aggressive NHL (defined as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL], grade 3B FL, mantle cell lymphoma, and transformed NHL with relapsed disease; n=5).

The patients’ median age was 68 (range, 34-93), and 59% were male. The median number of prior treatment regimens was 3 (range, 1-13), and 37% of patients had refractory disease.

Patients received cerdulatinib at 25, 30, or 35 mg twice daily (BID). A total of 101 patients were evaluable as of May 4, 2018.

Response

The objective response rate (ORR) was 47% in the entire population. Thirteen patients achieved a complete response (CR), and 34 had a partial response (PR). Thirty-four patients remained on cerdulatinib at the data cut-off.

The ORR was 46% in the FL patients, with 3 patients achieving a CR and 13 achieving a PR. Thirteen FL patients remained on cerdulatinib.

In the CLL/SLL patients, the ORR was 61%. Two patients had a CR, and 15 had a PR. Four CLL/SLL patients remained on cerdulatinib.

In PTCL, the ORR was 35%. All 7 responders had a CR. Eleven PTCL patients remained on cerdulatinib.

Only 1 CTCL patient was evaluable, but this patient achieved a CR and remained on cerdulatinib.

The ORR was 42% for patients with other indolent NHLs, with 5 PRs and no CRs. Only 1 patient in this group remained on cerdulatinib.

For aggressive NHL, the ORR was 20%, with 1 PR and no CRs. None of the patients in this group stayed on cerdulatinib.

“Cerdulatinib continues to demonstrate promising results across a wide range of B- and T-cell malignancies, including early indications of the potential for durable responses,” said study investigator Paul Hamlin, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, New York.

“The new signals in relapsed/refractory PTCL and CTCL are particularly compelling when you consider the limited treatment options for patients that fail frontline therapy.”

Safety

Grade 3 or higher adverse events included lipase increase (18%), neutropenia (17%), pneumonia/lung infection (11%), diarrhea (8%), fatigue (6%), amylase increase (5%), sepsis/septic shock (4%), hypertension (4%), anemia (4%), thrombocytopenia (4%), and hypophosphatemia (4%).

The 5 deaths due to sepsis or septic shock (3 of which were concomitant with pneumonia) were considered related to cerdulatinib. Three of the deaths occurred in patients with CLL, 1 in a DLBCL patient, and 1 in an FL patient.

“One of the things we have seen [with CLL patients] is the background infection rate is quite a bit higher,” said John T. Curnutte, MD, PhD, interim co-president and head of research and development at Portola Pharmaceuticals.

“You see this with multiple other agents, so we were not particularly surprised to see [sepsis/septic shock in CLL].”

Dr Curnutte noted that grade 5 sepsis/septic shock tended to occur in patients who were pre-colonized and/or had high plasma levels of cerdulatinib.

So, to prevent these adverse events, the starting dose of cerdulatinib was lowered, investigators began monitoring patients’ plasma levels, and all patients began receiving antibiotic prophylaxis. (Previously, only CLL patients had received this prophylaxis.)

The investigators found that lowering the starting dose from 35 mg BID to 30 mg or even 25 mg BID reduced plasma levels.

“At the 35 mg dose, 1 out of every 4 patients showed accumulation of the drug,” Dr Curnutte said. “In general, the use of the 30 mg BID or step-down 25 mg BID did not result in accumulation of drug.”

Dr Curnutte also noted that enrollment of CLL/SLL patients is complete, and investigators would be “very careful” if the study were to be re-opened to these patients.

For now, Portola is focused on completing enrollment in other patient groups on this phase 2 trial. The company is also hoping to conduct a phase 3 trial of cerdulatinib in PTCL that could begin as early as the end of this year.

Valentin Goede, MD

STOCKHOLM—Obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (G-Clb) is a “valid and beneficial” frontline treatment option for “unfit” patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), according to a speaker at the 23rd Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA).

Final results from the CLL11 study have revealed additional benefits of G-Clb over rituximab plus chlorambucil (R-Clb) in patients with previously untreated CLL and comorbidities.

Prior results from this study showed that G-Clb produced higher response rates and prolonged progression-fee survival (PFS) compared to R-Clb.

Now, with a median follow-up of 5 years, researchers have found that G-Clb prolongs overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) as well.

Valentin Goede, MD, of the University Hospital Cologne in Germany, presented these results during the Presidential Symposium of the EHA Congress (abstract S151).

The study was sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche.

CLL11 enrolled patients with previously untreated CLL and coexisting medical conditions. They were randomized to receive six 28-day cycles of Clb alone, G-Clb, or R-Clb.

In stage 1, researchers compared G-Clb (n=238) to Clb alone (n=118) and R-Clb (n=233) to Clb alone (n=118). In stage 2, they compared G-Clb (n=333) and R-Clb (n=330).

“The treatment arms were well-balanced, not just with regard to patient [characteristics] but also with disease characteristics,” Dr Goede said.

Overall, the median age was 73 (range, 39-90), the median Cumulative Illness Rating Scale score was 8, and the median creatinine clearance was 62 mL/min.

Efficacy: G-Clb vs Clb

The median observation time for G-Clb vs Clb was 62.5 months.

The median PFS was 31.1 months in the G-Clb arm and 11.1 months in the Clb arm. The 5-year PFS rates were 25% and 2%, respectively. The hazard ratio (HR) was 0.21 (P<0.0001).

The median OS was not reached in the G-Clb arm and was 66.7 months in the Clb arm. The 5-year OS rates were 66% and 53%, respectively. The HR was 0.68 (P=0.0196).

Thirty-nine percent of the G-Clb arm died, as did 49% of the Clb arm. The main causes of death were adverse events (AEs) and disease progression.

Efficacy: G-Clb vs R-Clb

The median observation time for G-Clb vs R-Clb was 59.4 months.

The median PFS was 28.9 months in the G-Clb arm and 15.7 months in the R-Clb arm. The 5-year PFS rates were 23% and 9%, respectively. The HR was 0.49 (P<0.0001).

“The median PFS was nearly doubled, from approximately 15 months in the rituximab arm to almost 30 months in the obinutuzumab arm,” Dr Goede said. “And this translated into a clinically meaningful prolongation of time to next treatment.”

The median TTNT was 56.4 months in the G-Clb arm and 34.9 months in the R-Clb arm. At 5 years, TTNT rates were 49% and 32%, respectively. The HR was 0.58 (P<0.0001).

“In the rituximab arm, the median time to next treatment was a little greater than 2.5 years, and, in the obinutuzumab arm, it was almost 5 years,” Dr Goede said. “From a clinical perspective, I would consider treatment-free intervals of that duration as highly relevant and beneficial in an elderly population.”

The median OS was not reached in the G-Clb arm and was 73.1 months in the R-Clb arm. The 5-year OS rates were 66% and 57%, respectively. The HR was 0.76 (P=0.0245).

“This difference is clinically meaningful, and it is also remarkable in the context of the long follow-up, given the fact that approximately half of the patients have received at least 1 salvage treatment in the meantime,” Dr Goede said.

In all, 37% of the G-Clb arm died, as did 45% of the R-Clb arm. Again, the main causes of death were AEs and disease progression.

Safety

Dr Goede said no new safety signals or late-onset toxicities were detected.

“Adverse events of any grade, but particularly grade 3-5 and serious adverse events, were more frequent in the obinutuzumab arm compared to the other 2 arms,” he noted. “[This] was mainly driven by more infusion reactions and some greater hematological toxicity.”

“Importantly, the rate of fatal adverse events, during treatment but also during follow-up, was not higher in the obinutuzumab arm. And the most common fatal adverse events were second malignancies.”

G-Clb vs Clb

Ninety-five percent of patients in the G-Clb arm and 83% of those in the Clb arm had at least 1 AE. The rates of grade 3-5 AEs were 74% and 51%, respectively. The rates of serious AEs were 47% and 39%, respectively. The rates of fatal AEs were 8% and 11%, respectively.

Seventeen percent of patients in the G-Clb arm and 11% of those in the Clb arm had late-onset neutropenia. The rates of prolonged neutropenia were 3% and 9%, respectively.

Fourteen percent of patients in the G-Clb arm and 7% of those in the Clb arm had second malignancies (starting 6 months after treatment initiation). The most common of these were squamous cell carcinoma (2% vs 0%) and basal cell carcinoma (2% vs <1%).

G-Clb vs R-Clb

Ninety-four percent of patients in the G-Clb arm and 90% of those in the R-Clb arm had at least 1 AE. The rates of grade 3-5 AEs were 72% and 60%, respectively. The rates of serious AEs were 45% and 39%, respectively. The rates of fatal AEs were 7% and 10%, respectively.

Fifteen percent of patients in the G-Clb arm and 12% of those in the R-Clb arm had late-onset neutropenia. The rates of prolonged neutropenia were 2% and 4%, respectively.

Eleven percent of patients in the G-Clb arm and 10% of those in the Clb arm had second malignancies. Squamous cell carcinoma occurred in 2% of patients in both arms. Basal cell carcinoma occurred in 2% of G-Clb recipients and 1% of R-Clb recipients.

Valentin Goede, MD

STOCKHOLM—Obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (G-Clb) is a “valid and beneficial” frontline treatment option for “unfit” patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), according to a speaker at the 23rd Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA).

Final results from the CLL11 study have revealed additional benefits of G-Clb over rituximab plus chlorambucil (R-Clb) in patients with previously untreated CLL and comorbidities.

Prior results from this study showed that G-Clb produced higher response rates and prolonged progression-fee survival (PFS) compared to R-Clb.

Now, with a median follow-up of 5 years, researchers have found that G-Clb prolongs overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) as well.

Valentin Goede, MD, of the University Hospital Cologne in Germany, presented these results during the Presidential Symposium of the EHA Congress (abstract S151).

The study was sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche.

CLL11 enrolled patients with previously untreated CLL and coexisting medical conditions. They were randomized to receive six 28-day cycles of Clb alone, G-Clb, or R-Clb.

In stage 1, researchers compared G-Clb (n=238) to Clb alone (n=118) and R-Clb (n=233) to Clb alone (n=118). In stage 2, they compared G-Clb (n=333) and R-Clb (n=330).

“The treatment arms were well-balanced, not just with regard to patient [characteristics] but also with disease characteristics,” Dr Goede said.

Overall, the median age was 73 (range, 39-90), the median Cumulative Illness Rating Scale score was 8, and the median creatinine clearance was 62 mL/min.

Efficacy: G-Clb vs Clb

The median observation time for G-Clb vs Clb was 62.5 months.

The median PFS was 31.1 months in the G-Clb arm and 11.1 months in the Clb arm. The 5-year PFS rates were 25% and 2%, respectively. The hazard ratio (HR) was 0.21 (P<0.0001).

The median OS was not reached in the G-Clb arm and was 66.7 months in the Clb arm. The 5-year OS rates were 66% and 53%, respectively. The HR was 0.68 (P=0.0196).

Thirty-nine percent of the G-Clb arm died, as did 49% of the Clb arm. The main causes of death were adverse events (AEs) and disease progression.

Efficacy: G-Clb vs R-Clb

The median observation time for G-Clb vs R-Clb was 59.4 months.

The median PFS was 28.9 months in the G-Clb arm and 15.7 months in the R-Clb arm. The 5-year PFS rates were 23% and 9%, respectively. The HR was 0.49 (P<0.0001).

“The median PFS was nearly doubled, from approximately 15 months in the rituximab arm to almost 30 months in the obinutuzumab arm,” Dr Goede said. “And this translated into a clinically meaningful prolongation of time to next treatment.”

The median TTNT was 56.4 months in the G-Clb arm and 34.9 months in the R-Clb arm. At 5 years, TTNT rates were 49% and 32%, respectively. The HR was 0.58 (P<0.0001).

“In the rituximab arm, the median time to next treatment was a little greater than 2.5 years, and, in the obinutuzumab arm, it was almost 5 years,” Dr Goede said. “From a clinical perspective, I would consider treatment-free intervals of that duration as highly relevant and beneficial in an elderly population.”

The median OS was not reached in the G-Clb arm and was 73.1 months in the R-Clb arm. The 5-year OS rates were 66% and 57%, respectively. The HR was 0.76 (P=0.0245).

“This difference is clinically meaningful, and it is also remarkable in the context of the long follow-up, given the fact that approximately half of the patients have received at least 1 salvage treatment in the meantime,” Dr Goede said.

In all, 37% of the G-Clb arm died, as did 45% of the R-Clb arm. Again, the main causes of death were AEs and disease progression.

Safety

Dr Goede said no new safety signals or late-onset toxicities were detected.

“Adverse events of any grade, but particularly grade 3-5 and serious adverse events, were more frequent in the obinutuzumab arm compared to the other 2 arms,” he noted. “[This] was mainly driven by more infusion reactions and some greater hematological toxicity.”

“Importantly, the rate of fatal adverse events, during treatment but also during follow-up, was not higher in the obinutuzumab arm. And the most common fatal adverse events were second malignancies.”

G-Clb vs Clb

Ninety-five percent of patients in the G-Clb arm and 83% of those in the Clb arm had at least 1 AE. The rates of grade 3-5 AEs were 74% and 51%, respectively. The rates of serious AEs were 47% and 39%, respectively. The rates of fatal AEs were 8% and 11%, respectively.

Seventeen percent of patients in the G-Clb arm and 11% of those in the Clb arm had late-onset neutropenia. The rates of prolonged neutropenia were 3% and 9%, respectively.

Fourteen percent of patients in the G-Clb arm and 7% of those in the Clb arm had second malignancies (starting 6 months after treatment initiation). The most common of these were squamous cell carcinoma (2% vs 0%) and basal cell carcinoma (2% vs <1%).

G-Clb vs R-Clb

Ninety-four percent of patients in the G-Clb arm and 90% of those in the R-Clb arm had at least 1 AE. The rates of grade 3-5 AEs were 72% and 60%, respectively. The rates of serious AEs were 45% and 39%, respectively. The rates of fatal AEs were 7% and 10%, respectively.

Fifteen percent of patients in the G-Clb arm and 12% of those in the R-Clb arm had late-onset neutropenia. The rates of prolonged neutropenia were 2% and 4%, respectively.

Eleven percent of patients in the G-Clb arm and 10% of those in the Clb arm had second malignancies. Squamous cell carcinoma occurred in 2% of patients in both arms. Basal cell carcinoma occurred in 2% of G-Clb recipients and 1% of R-Clb recipients.

Valentin Goede, MD

STOCKHOLM—Obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (G-Clb) is a “valid and beneficial” frontline treatment option for “unfit” patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), according to a speaker at the 23rd Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA).

Final results from the CLL11 study have revealed additional benefits of G-Clb over rituximab plus chlorambucil (R-Clb) in patients with previously untreated CLL and comorbidities.

Prior results from this study showed that G-Clb produced higher response rates and prolonged progression-fee survival (PFS) compared to R-Clb.

Now, with a median follow-up of 5 years, researchers have found that G-Clb prolongs overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) as well.

Valentin Goede, MD, of the University Hospital Cologne in Germany, presented these results during the Presidential Symposium of the EHA Congress (abstract S151).

The study was sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche.

CLL11 enrolled patients with previously untreated CLL and coexisting medical conditions. They were randomized to receive six 28-day cycles of Clb alone, G-Clb, or R-Clb.

In stage 1, researchers compared G-Clb (n=238) to Clb alone (n=118) and R-Clb (n=233) to Clb alone (n=118). In stage 2, they compared G-Clb (n=333) and R-Clb (n=330).

“The treatment arms were well-balanced, not just with regard to patient [characteristics] but also with disease characteristics,” Dr Goede said.

Overall, the median age was 73 (range, 39-90), the median Cumulative Illness Rating Scale score was 8, and the median creatinine clearance was 62 mL/min.

Efficacy: G-Clb vs Clb

The median observation time for G-Clb vs Clb was 62.5 months.

The median PFS was 31.1 months in the G-Clb arm and 11.1 months in the Clb arm. The 5-year PFS rates were 25% and 2%, respectively. The hazard ratio (HR) was 0.21 (P<0.0001).

The median OS was not reached in the G-Clb arm and was 66.7 months in the Clb arm. The 5-year OS rates were 66% and 53%, respectively. The HR was 0.68 (P=0.0196).

Thirty-nine percent of the G-Clb arm died, as did 49% of the Clb arm. The main causes of death were adverse events (AEs) and disease progression.

Efficacy: G-Clb vs R-Clb

The median observation time for G-Clb vs R-Clb was 59.4 months.

The median PFS was 28.9 months in the G-Clb arm and 15.7 months in the R-Clb arm. The 5-year PFS rates were 23% and 9%, respectively. The HR was 0.49 (P<0.0001).

“The median PFS was nearly doubled, from approximately 15 months in the rituximab arm to almost 30 months in the obinutuzumab arm,” Dr Goede said. “And this translated into a clinically meaningful prolongation of time to next treatment.”

The median TTNT was 56.4 months in the G-Clb arm and 34.9 months in the R-Clb arm. At 5 years, TTNT rates were 49% and 32%, respectively. The HR was 0.58 (P<0.0001).

“In the rituximab arm, the median time to next treatment was a little greater than 2.5 years, and, in the obinutuzumab arm, it was almost 5 years,” Dr Goede said. “From a clinical perspective, I would consider treatment-free intervals of that duration as highly relevant and beneficial in an elderly population.”

The median OS was not reached in the G-Clb arm and was 73.1 months in the R-Clb arm. The 5-year OS rates were 66% and 57%, respectively. The HR was 0.76 (P=0.0245).

“This difference is clinically meaningful, and it is also remarkable in the context of the long follow-up, given the fact that approximately half of the patients have received at least 1 salvage treatment in the meantime,” Dr Goede said.

In all, 37% of the G-Clb arm died, as did 45% of the R-Clb arm. Again, the main causes of death were AEs and disease progression.

Safety

Dr Goede said no new safety signals or late-onset toxicities were detected.

“Adverse events of any grade, but particularly grade 3-5 and serious adverse events, were more frequent in the obinutuzumab arm compared to the other 2 arms,” he noted. “[This] was mainly driven by more infusion reactions and some greater hematological toxicity.”

“Importantly, the rate of fatal adverse events, during treatment but also during follow-up, was not higher in the obinutuzumab arm. And the most common fatal adverse events were second malignancies.”

G-Clb vs Clb

Ninety-five percent of patients in the G-Clb arm and 83% of those in the Clb arm had at least 1 AE. The rates of grade 3-5 AEs were 74% and 51%, respectively. The rates of serious AEs were 47% and 39%, respectively. The rates of fatal AEs were 8% and 11%, respectively.

Seventeen percent of patients in the G-Clb arm and 11% of those in the Clb arm had late-onset neutropenia. The rates of prolonged neutropenia were 3% and 9%, respectively.

Fourteen percent of patients in the G-Clb arm and 7% of those in the Clb arm had second malignancies (starting 6 months after treatment initiation). The most common of these were squamous cell carcinoma (2% vs 0%) and basal cell carcinoma (2% vs <1%).

G-Clb vs R-Clb

Ninety-four percent of patients in the G-Clb arm and 90% of those in the R-Clb arm had at least 1 AE. The rates of grade 3-5 AEs were 72% and 60%, respectively. The rates of serious AEs were 45% and 39%, respectively. The rates of fatal AEs were 7% and 10%, respectively.

Fifteen percent of patients in the G-Clb arm and 12% of those in the R-Clb arm had late-onset neutropenia. The rates of prolonged neutropenia were 2% and 4%, respectively.

Eleven percent of patients in the G-Clb arm and 10% of those in the Clb arm had second malignancies. Squamous cell carcinoma occurred in 2% of patients in both arms. Basal cell carcinoma occurred in 2% of G-Clb recipients and 1% of R-Clb recipients.

©ASCO/Scott Morgan 2018

CHICAGO—Minimal residual disease (MRD) kinetics confirms the high, durable MRD-negativity with venetoclax plus rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), according to a further examination of the phase 3 MURANO study.

Undetectable MRD-negativity is associated with extended progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy for CLL.

“Attainment of MRD-negativity in relapsed/refractory CLL is also a desired trial endpoint due to the subjectivity of complete response definition regarding pathologic lymph node size,” said Peter Hillmen, MD, of St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom, at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting.

Dr Hillmen reported new data on MRD response in cytogenetic and molecular risk groups, MRD sustainability and kinetics, and MRD conversion in the MURANO trial (abstract 7508).

MURANO trial (NCT02005471)

In the trial, venetoclax-rituximab showed superior PFS and peripheral blood and bone marrow MRD-negativity as compared to bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) in relapsed/refractory CLL patients.

Patients were randomized to venetoclax-rituximab for 6 months, followed by single-agent venetoclax for up to 1.5 years, or BR for 6 months. Peripheral blood samples were serially collected and bone marrow was collected at the end of combination treatment or at best response.

MRD findings

The new results show higher concordance in MRD-negativity between bone marrow and peripheral blood in venetoclax-rituximab (45 of 50 patients, 90%) vs BR (3 of 10 patients, 30%) in paired samples.

Focusing on peripheral blood MRD, Dr Hillmen said the best MRD-negativity rates were higher with venetoclax-rituximab (84%) than BR (23%). These results were independent of high-risk factors—such as del 17p, IGVH unmutated, and mutated TP53—only for venetoclax-rituximab treated patients.

“The superior peripheral blood MRD response with venetoclax-rituximab was consistent across subgroups at the end of completion of treatment,” Dr Hillmen said. “Most patients who achieved peripheral blood MRD-negativity on venetoclax-rituximab remained MRD-negative and were progression-free.”

Among 121 of 194 (62%) patients on venetoclax-rituximab who achieved MRD-negativity at the end of combination therapy, 100 (83%) patients maintained MRD-negativity and were progression-free at a median follow-up of 13.8 months. Two patients developed progressive disease and 2 patients died (unrelated to CLL).

Two patients developed Richter’s disease (with one MRD-positive directly before therapy) and 15 (12%) patients converted to confirmed MRD-positive at a median MRD-positive follow-up of 5.6 months.

“High peripheral blood MRD-negativity at the end of combination treatment and concordance with bone marrow MRD with venetoclax-rituximab,” Dr Hillmen said, “confirms the value of peripheral blood MRD for evaluation of treatment benefit in relapsed/refractory CLL patients. The high rate of peripheral blood MRD-negativity at end of combination treatment with venetoclax-rituximab was attained regardless of risk features.”

Some conversion to MRD-positivity occurred only in a small proportion of patients. Most cases were of intermediate level and remained progression-free, he said.

“MRD kinetics indicate that peripheral blood MRD-negativity with venetoclax-rituximab occurs early and is maintained over time with current follow-up,” Dr Hillmen added. The MRD data now provide a framework for designing response adaptive therapy.

The US Food and Drug Administration recently approved venetoclax-rituximab for CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma for patients with or without del 17p.

Venetoclax is being developed by Genentech and Abbvie. 

©ASCO/Scott Morgan 2018

CHICAGO—Minimal residual disease (MRD) kinetics confirms the high, durable MRD-negativity with venetoclax plus rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), according to a further examination of the phase 3 MURANO study.

Undetectable MRD-negativity is associated with extended progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy for CLL.

“Attainment of MRD-negativity in relapsed/refractory CLL is also a desired trial endpoint due to the subjectivity of complete response definition regarding pathologic lymph node size,” said Peter Hillmen, MD, of St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom, at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting.

Dr Hillmen reported new data on MRD response in cytogenetic and molecular risk groups, MRD sustainability and kinetics, and MRD conversion in the MURANO trial (abstract 7508).

MURANO trial (NCT02005471)

In the trial, venetoclax-rituximab showed superior PFS and peripheral blood and bone marrow MRD-negativity as compared to bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) in relapsed/refractory CLL patients.

Patients were randomized to venetoclax-rituximab for 6 months, followed by single-agent venetoclax for up to 1.5 years, or BR for 6 months. Peripheral blood samples were serially collected and bone marrow was collected at the end of combination treatment or at best response.

MRD findings

The new results show higher concordance in MRD-negativity between bone marrow and peripheral blood in venetoclax-rituximab (45 of 50 patients, 90%) vs BR (3 of 10 patients, 30%) in paired samples.

Focusing on peripheral blood MRD, Dr Hillmen said the best MRD-negativity rates were higher with venetoclax-rituximab (84%) than BR (23%). These results were independent of high-risk factors—such as del 17p, IGVH unmutated, and mutated TP53—only for venetoclax-rituximab treated patients.

“The superior peripheral blood MRD response with venetoclax-rituximab was consistent across subgroups at the end of completion of treatment,” Dr Hillmen said. “Most patients who achieved peripheral blood MRD-negativity on venetoclax-rituximab remained MRD-negative and were progression-free.”

Among 121 of 194 (62%) patients on venetoclax-rituximab who achieved MRD-negativity at the end of combination therapy, 100 (83%) patients maintained MRD-negativity and were progression-free at a median follow-up of 13.8 months. Two patients developed progressive disease and 2 patients died (unrelated to CLL).

Two patients developed Richter’s disease (with one MRD-positive directly before therapy) and 15 (12%) patients converted to confirmed MRD-positive at a median MRD-positive follow-up of 5.6 months.

“High peripheral blood MRD-negativity at the end of combination treatment and concordance with bone marrow MRD with venetoclax-rituximab,” Dr Hillmen said, “confirms the value of peripheral blood MRD for evaluation of treatment benefit in relapsed/refractory CLL patients. The high rate of peripheral blood MRD-negativity at end of combination treatment with venetoclax-rituximab was attained regardless of risk features.”

Some conversion to MRD-positivity occurred only in a small proportion of patients. Most cases were of intermediate level and remained progression-free, he said.

“MRD kinetics indicate that peripheral blood MRD-negativity with venetoclax-rituximab occurs early and is maintained over time with current follow-up,” Dr Hillmen added. The MRD data now provide a framework for designing response adaptive therapy.

The US Food and Drug Administration recently approved venetoclax-rituximab for CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma for patients with or without del 17p.

Venetoclax is being developed by Genentech and Abbvie. 

©ASCO/Scott Morgan 2018

CHICAGO—Minimal residual disease (MRD) kinetics confirms the high, durable MRD-negativity with venetoclax plus rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), according to a further examination of the phase 3 MURANO study.

Undetectable MRD-negativity is associated with extended progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy for CLL.

“Attainment of MRD-negativity in relapsed/refractory CLL is also a desired trial endpoint due to the subjectivity of complete response definition regarding pathologic lymph node size,” said Peter Hillmen, MD, of St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom, at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting.

Dr Hillmen reported new data on MRD response in cytogenetic and molecular risk groups, MRD sustainability and kinetics, and MRD conversion in the MURANO trial (abstract 7508).

MURANO trial (NCT02005471)

In the trial, venetoclax-rituximab showed superior PFS and peripheral blood and bone marrow MRD-negativity as compared to bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) in relapsed/refractory CLL patients.

Patients were randomized to venetoclax-rituximab for 6 months, followed by single-agent venetoclax for up to 1.5 years, or BR for 6 months. Peripheral blood samples were serially collected and bone marrow was collected at the end of combination treatment or at best response.

MRD findings

The new results show higher concordance in MRD-negativity between bone marrow and peripheral blood in venetoclax-rituximab (45 of 50 patients, 90%) vs BR (3 of 10 patients, 30%) in paired samples.

Focusing on peripheral blood MRD, Dr Hillmen said the best MRD-negativity rates were higher with venetoclax-rituximab (84%) than BR (23%). These results were independent of high-risk factors—such as del 17p, IGVH unmutated, and mutated TP53—only for venetoclax-rituximab treated patients.

“The superior peripheral blood MRD response with venetoclax-rituximab was consistent across subgroups at the end of completion of treatment,” Dr Hillmen said. “Most patients who achieved peripheral blood MRD-negativity on venetoclax-rituximab remained MRD-negative and were progression-free.”

Among 121 of 194 (62%) patients on venetoclax-rituximab who achieved MRD-negativity at the end of combination therapy, 100 (83%) patients maintained MRD-negativity and were progression-free at a median follow-up of 13.8 months. Two patients developed progressive disease and 2 patients died (unrelated to CLL).

Two patients developed Richter’s disease (with one MRD-positive directly before therapy) and 15 (12%) patients converted to confirmed MRD-positive at a median MRD-positive follow-up of 5.6 months.

“High peripheral blood MRD-negativity at the end of combination treatment and concordance with bone marrow MRD with venetoclax-rituximab,” Dr Hillmen said, “confirms the value of peripheral blood MRD for evaluation of treatment benefit in relapsed/refractory CLL patients. The high rate of peripheral blood MRD-negativity at end of combination treatment with venetoclax-rituximab was attained regardless of risk features.”

Some conversion to MRD-positivity occurred only in a small proportion of patients. Most cases were of intermediate level and remained progression-free, he said.

“MRD kinetics indicate that peripheral blood MRD-negativity with venetoclax-rituximab occurs early and is maintained over time with current follow-up,” Dr Hillmen added. The MRD data now provide a framework for designing response adaptive therapy.

The US Food and Drug Administration recently approved venetoclax-rituximab for CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma for patients with or without del 17p.

Venetoclax is being developed by Genentech and Abbvie. 

Photo by © ASCO/Zach Boyden-Holmes 2018

CHICAGO—Ibrutinib combined with venetoclax is showing promising clinical activity in the frontline treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), according to investigators for the CAPTIVATE study.

In the first 30 patients, 77% of treatment-naïve patients had undetected minimal residual disease (MRD; <10^-4 cells) in the blood and 86% showed a similar response in the bone marrow.

The overall response rate (ORR) was 100% in 11 evaluable patients. The investigators reported this initial data at the 2018 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (abstract 7502).

“These early results show a highly active and safe treatment with 12 cycles of combined treatment with ibrutinib and venetoclax,” said William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas, who presented the findings at ASCO.

Ibrutinib, a Bruton-kinase inhibitor, has already been approved for the treatment of CLL and venetoclax, a Bcl-2 inhibitor, is currently used to treat relapsed del 17p CLL.

Venetoclax in combination with rituximab was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma whether or not patients have del 17p.

With complementary mechanisms of action and preclinical studies suggesting synergy with the combination, CAPTIVATE was designed to test the efficacy of the oral combination given for 12 cycles.

Study design

 CAPTIVATE (NCT02910583) is an ongoing phase 2 study that enrolled 164 patients with treatment-naïve CLL. Patients first received 3 cycles of ibrutinib monotherapy at the standard dose. This was intended to debulk the disease and reduce risk for venetoclax-associated tumor lysis syndrome (TLS).

Venetoclax 400 mg was initiated at cycle 4. After 12 cycles of the combination, patients with confirmed MRD negativity were randomized to receive ibrutinib with a placebo or to continue with the combination therapy.

In this initial report, Dr Wierda highlighted safety data for all 164 enrolled patients and efficacy data for the first 30 patients who had 6 cycles of combination therapy (MRD assessment cohort).

Dr Wierda also reported bone marrow data for the first 14 patients, who received a total of 12 cycles of the combination and represent the safety run-in cohort.

Ibrutinib and venetoclax show promising activity

 Median age of patients was 58 years; about 2/3 of patients had unmutated IGHV and 1/3 had a creatine clearance of <80 mL/min.

Of 164 patients, 95% remain on therapy, with discontinuations reported for adverse events; one patient had disease progression to Richter’s transformation.

For the MRD evaluation, all 30 patients had 6 months of combination therapy and continue on treatment.

As expected, lead-in with ibrutinib monotherapy debulked the disease.

Investigators observed a reduction in the proportion of patients at high risk for TLS (24% to 3%) and an increase in the proportion of patients at low risk for TLS (12% to 29%).

A similar picture emerged for debulking of lymph node disease. No patient developed clinical TLS.

Other adverse events were consistent with the safety profile of single-agent ibrutinib and venetoclax. No new safety signals were seen.

After 6 cycles of the combination, blood MRD negativity was reported in 77% of the patients in the MRD assessment cohort.

In the safety-run in cohort of 14 patients, blood MRD negativity was reported in 86% of patients after 12 cycles and 93% of patients after 15 cycles of the combination. In these patients, bone marrow MRD negativity was achieved in 86%.

After 12 cycles of combination therapy, the objective response rate was 100% for 11 of the 14 evaluable patients from the safety run-in cohort: 6 patients showed complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) for a CR/CRi of 55%. All patients had confirmed undetectable MRD.

Investigators considered these responses promising and an assessment of the full treatment plan and durability of response are awaited.

The study was sponsored by Pharmacyclics. 

Photo by © ASCO/Zach Boyden-Holmes 2018

CHICAGO—Ibrutinib combined with venetoclax is showing promising clinical activity in the frontline treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), according to investigators for the CAPTIVATE study.

In the first 30 patients, 77% of treatment-naïve patients had undetected minimal residual disease (MRD; <10^-4 cells) in the blood and 86% showed a similar response in the bone marrow.

The overall response rate (ORR) was 100% in 11 evaluable patients. The investigators reported this initial data at the 2018 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (abstract 7502).

“These early results show a highly active and safe treatment with 12 cycles of combined treatment with ibrutinib and venetoclax,” said William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas, who presented the findings at ASCO.

Ibrutinib, a Bruton-kinase inhibitor, has already been approved for the treatment of CLL and venetoclax, a Bcl-2 inhibitor, is currently used to treat relapsed del 17p CLL.

Venetoclax in combination with rituximab was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma whether or not patients have del 17p.

With complementary mechanisms of action and preclinical studies suggesting synergy with the combination, CAPTIVATE was designed to test the efficacy of the oral combination given for 12 cycles.

Study design

 CAPTIVATE (NCT02910583) is an ongoing phase 2 study that enrolled 164 patients with treatment-naïve CLL. Patients first received 3 cycles of ibrutinib monotherapy at the standard dose. This was intended to debulk the disease and reduce risk for venetoclax-associated tumor lysis syndrome (TLS).

Venetoclax 400 mg was initiated at cycle 4. After 12 cycles of the combination, patients with confirmed MRD negativity were randomized to receive ibrutinib with a placebo or to continue with the combination therapy.

In this initial report, Dr Wierda highlighted safety data for all 164 enrolled patients and efficacy data for the first 30 patients who had 6 cycles of combination therapy (MRD assessment cohort).

Dr Wierda also reported bone marrow data for the first 14 patients, who received a total of 12 cycles of the combination and represent the safety run-in cohort.

Ibrutinib and venetoclax show promising activity

 Median age of patients was 58 years; about 2/3 of patients had unmutated IGHV and 1/3 had a creatine clearance of <80 mL/min.

Of 164 patients, 95% remain on therapy, with discontinuations reported for adverse events; one patient had disease progression to Richter’s transformation.

For the MRD evaluation, all 30 patients had 6 months of combination therapy and continue on treatment.

As expected, lead-in with ibrutinib monotherapy debulked the disease.

Investigators observed a reduction in the proportion of patients at high risk for TLS (24% to 3%) and an increase in the proportion of patients at low risk for TLS (12% to 29%).

A similar picture emerged for debulking of lymph node disease. No patient developed clinical TLS.

Other adverse events were consistent with the safety profile of single-agent ibrutinib and venetoclax. No new safety signals were seen.

After 6 cycles of the combination, blood MRD negativity was reported in 77% of the patients in the MRD assessment cohort.

In the safety-run in cohort of 14 patients, blood MRD negativity was reported in 86% of patients after 12 cycles and 93% of patients after 15 cycles of the combination. In these patients, bone marrow MRD negativity was achieved in 86%.

After 12 cycles of combination therapy, the objective response rate was 100% for 11 of the 14 evaluable patients from the safety run-in cohort: 6 patients showed complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) for a CR/CRi of 55%. All patients had confirmed undetectable MRD.

Investigators considered these responses promising and an assessment of the full treatment plan and durability of response are awaited.

The study was sponsored by Pharmacyclics. 

Photo by © ASCO/Zach Boyden-Holmes 2018

CHICAGO—Ibrutinib combined with venetoclax is showing promising clinical activity in the frontline treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), according to investigators for the CAPTIVATE study.

In the first 30 patients, 77% of treatment-naïve patients had undetected minimal residual disease (MRD; <10^-4 cells) in the blood and 86% showed a similar response in the bone marrow.

The overall response rate (ORR) was 100% in 11 evaluable patients. The investigators reported this initial data at the 2018 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (abstract 7502).

“These early results show a highly active and safe treatment with 12 cycles of combined treatment with ibrutinib and venetoclax,” said William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas, who presented the findings at ASCO.

Ibrutinib, a Bruton-kinase inhibitor, has already been approved for the treatment of CLL and venetoclax, a Bcl-2 inhibitor, is currently used to treat relapsed del 17p CLL.

Venetoclax in combination with rituximab was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma whether or not patients have del 17p.

With complementary mechanisms of action and preclinical studies suggesting synergy with the combination, CAPTIVATE was designed to test the efficacy of the oral combination given for 12 cycles.

Study design

 CAPTIVATE (NCT02910583) is an ongoing phase 2 study that enrolled 164 patients with treatment-naïve CLL. Patients first received 3 cycles of ibrutinib monotherapy at the standard dose. This was intended to debulk the disease and reduce risk for venetoclax-associated tumor lysis syndrome (TLS).

Venetoclax 400 mg was initiated at cycle 4. After 12 cycles of the combination, patients with confirmed MRD negativity were randomized to receive ibrutinib with a placebo or to continue with the combination therapy.

In this initial report, Dr Wierda highlighted safety data for all 164 enrolled patients and efficacy data for the first 30 patients who had 6 cycles of combination therapy (MRD assessment cohort).

Dr Wierda also reported bone marrow data for the first 14 patients, who received a total of 12 cycles of the combination and represent the safety run-in cohort.

Ibrutinib and venetoclax show promising activity

 Median age of patients was 58 years; about 2/3 of patients had unmutated IGHV and 1/3 had a creatine clearance of <80 mL/min.

Of 164 patients, 95% remain on therapy, with discontinuations reported for adverse events; one patient had disease progression to Richter’s transformation.

For the MRD evaluation, all 30 patients had 6 months of combination therapy and continue on treatment.

As expected, lead-in with ibrutinib monotherapy debulked the disease.

Investigators observed a reduction in the proportion of patients at high risk for TLS (24% to 3%) and an increase in the proportion of patients at low risk for TLS (12% to 29%).

A similar picture emerged for debulking of lymph node disease. No patient developed clinical TLS.

Other adverse events were consistent with the safety profile of single-agent ibrutinib and venetoclax. No new safety signals were seen.

After 6 cycles of the combination, blood MRD negativity was reported in 77% of the patients in the MRD assessment cohort.

In the safety-run in cohort of 14 patients, blood MRD negativity was reported in 86% of patients after 12 cycles and 93% of patients after 15 cycles of the combination. In these patients, bone marrow MRD negativity was achieved in 86%.

After 12 cycles of combination therapy, the objective response rate was 100% for 11 of the 14 evaluable patients from the safety run-in cohort: 6 patients showed complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) for a CR/CRi of 55%. All patients had confirmed undetectable MRD.

Investigators considered these responses promising and an assessment of the full treatment plan and durability of response are awaited.

The study was sponsored by Pharmacyclics. 

©ASCO/Scott Morgan 2018

CHICAGO—A chemotherapy-free combination of lenalidomide plus rituximab shows similar efficacy and a different safety profile to chemotherapy plus rituximab (R-chemo) followed by rituximab maintenance in patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL).

According to investigators, the multicenter, international phase 3 RELEVANCE trial is the first to evaluate the chemo-free combination against the standard of care, R-chemo with rituximab maintenance.

“These results show that lenalidomide plus rituximab, a novel immunomodulatory approach, is a potential first-line option for patients with FL requiring treatment,” said investigator Nathan H. Fowler, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

Dr Fowler presented the results of the study at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 7500).

The current standard of care in previously untreated symptomatic FL is immunochemotherapy induction followed by rituximab maintenance.

The immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide has complementary mechanisms with rituximab. Phase 2 studies of combined immunotherapy with lenalidomide and rituximab demonstrated 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 79%-81% in previously untreated FL, Dr Fowler said.

Phase 3 RELEVANCE trial (NCT01650701)

Investigators evaluated 1030 previously untreated grade 1-3a FL patients who required therapy.

Patients in the lenalidomide-rituximab group (n=513) received lenalidomide doses of 20 mg per day on days 2 to 22 and 28 for 6 to 12 cycles. Responders continued on therapy at 10 mg per day for a total of 18 cycles.

The rituximab dose was 375 mg/m² weekly in cycle 1 and day 1 in cycles 2 to 6 and continued in responders for 12 additional cycles.

Patients in the R-chemo arm (n=517) received the investigator’s choice of standard rituximab-CHOP, rituximab-bendamustine, or rituximab-CVP, followed by 12 cycles of rituximab.

Most patients (72%) in the R-chemo arm received R-CHOP.

Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups, Dr Fowler said.

Co-primary endpoints were complete remission/complete remission unconfirmed (CR/Cru) at 120 weeks and PFS.

Results

At a median follow-up of 37.9 months, the superiority for lenalidomide and rituximab over rituximab-chemotherapy was not established.

For the lenalidomide-rituximab patients, the CR/Cru was 48% and 3-year PFS was 77% as compared to 53% and 78%, respectively, for rituximab-chemotherapy patients, as assessed by an independent review committee.

Overall survival was 94% in both groups.

Safety

“Important differences in safety profiles were observed between the arms,” Dr Fowler said.

Rituximab-chemotherapy patients had more frequent neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, growth factor usage, nausea, vomiting, neuropathy, and alopecia.

Lenalidomide and rituximab showed more cutaneous reactions, tumor flare, and diarrhea.

Toxicity profiles differed, with higher grade 4 neutropenia (31% vs 8%) and febrile neutropenia (7% vs 2%) with rituximab-chemotherapy compared with lenalidomide-rituximab, respectively.

More patients experienced grade 3/4 cutaneous events (7% vs 1%) with lenalidomide-rituximab.

Second primary malignancies were slightly higher with rituximab-chemotherapy (10%) than with lenalidomide-rituximab (7%). Grade 5 adverse events were 1% in both groups.

About 70% of patients completed treatment in both groups.

“Lenalidomide and rituximab was not superior to rituximab-chemotherapy based on mature CR/Cru at 120 weeks and interim PFS,” Dr Fowler said. “Both treatments showed similar efficacy results. Treatment effects on PFS were consistent across pre-specified subgroups.”

Dr Fowler presented data as of May 31, 2017. Continued follow-up on PFS and OS is ongoing.

The study is sponsored by Celgene Corporation and the Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation (LYSARC). 

©ASCO/Scott Morgan 2018

CHICAGO—A chemotherapy-free combination of lenalidomide plus rituximab shows similar efficacy and a different safety profile to chemotherapy plus rituximab (R-chemo) followed by rituximab maintenance in patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL).

According to investigators, the multicenter, international phase 3 RELEVANCE trial is the first to evaluate the chemo-free combination against the standard of care, R-chemo with rituximab maintenance.

“These results show that lenalidomide plus rituximab, a novel immunomodulatory approach, is a potential first-line option for patients with FL requiring treatment,” said investigator Nathan H. Fowler, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

Dr Fowler presented the results of the study at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 7500).

The current standard of care in previously untreated symptomatic FL is immunochemotherapy induction followed by rituximab maintenance.

The immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide has complementary mechanisms with rituximab. Phase 2 studies of combined immunotherapy with lenalidomide and rituximab demonstrated 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 79%-81% in previously untreated FL, Dr Fowler said.

Phase 3 RELEVANCE trial (NCT01650701)

Investigators evaluated 1030 previously untreated grade 1-3a FL patients who required therapy.

Patients in the lenalidomide-rituximab group (n=513) received lenalidomide doses of 20 mg per day on days 2 to 22 and 28 for 6 to 12 cycles. Responders continued on therapy at 10 mg per day for a total of 18 cycles.

The rituximab dose was 375 mg/m² weekly in cycle 1 and day 1 in cycles 2 to 6 and continued in responders for 12 additional cycles.

Patients in the R-chemo arm (n=517) received the investigator’s choice of standard rituximab-CHOP, rituximab-bendamustine, or rituximab-CVP, followed by 12 cycles of rituximab.

Most patients (72%) in the R-chemo arm received R-CHOP.

Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups, Dr Fowler said.

Co-primary endpoints were complete remission/complete remission unconfirmed (CR/Cru) at 120 weeks and PFS.

Results

At a median follow-up of 37.9 months, the superiority for lenalidomide and rituximab over rituximab-chemotherapy was not established.

For the lenalidomide-rituximab patients, the CR/Cru was 48% and 3-year PFS was 77% as compared to 53% and 78%, respectively, for rituximab-chemotherapy patients, as assessed by an independent review committee.

Overall survival was 94% in both groups.

Safety

“Important differences in safety profiles were observed between the arms,” Dr Fowler said.

Rituximab-chemotherapy patients had more frequent neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, growth factor usage, nausea, vomiting, neuropathy, and alopecia.

Lenalidomide and rituximab showed more cutaneous reactions, tumor flare, and diarrhea.

Toxicity profiles differed, with higher grade 4 neutropenia (31% vs 8%) and febrile neutropenia (7% vs 2%) with rituximab-chemotherapy compared with lenalidomide-rituximab, respectively.

More patients experienced grade 3/4 cutaneous events (7% vs 1%) with lenalidomide-rituximab.

Second primary malignancies were slightly higher with rituximab-chemotherapy (10%) than with lenalidomide-rituximab (7%). Grade 5 adverse events were 1% in both groups.

About 70% of patients completed treatment in both groups.

“Lenalidomide and rituximab was not superior to rituximab-chemotherapy based on mature CR/Cru at 120 weeks and interim PFS,” Dr Fowler said. “Both treatments showed similar efficacy results. Treatment effects on PFS were consistent across pre-specified subgroups.”

Dr Fowler presented data as of May 31, 2017. Continued follow-up on PFS and OS is ongoing.

The study is sponsored by Celgene Corporation and the Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation (LYSARC). 

©ASCO/Scott Morgan 2018

CHICAGO—A chemotherapy-free combination of lenalidomide plus rituximab shows similar efficacy and a different safety profile to chemotherapy plus rituximab (R-chemo) followed by rituximab maintenance in patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL).

According to investigators, the multicenter, international phase 3 RELEVANCE trial is the first to evaluate the chemo-free combination against the standard of care, R-chemo with rituximab maintenance.

“These results show that lenalidomide plus rituximab, a novel immunomodulatory approach, is a potential first-line option for patients with FL requiring treatment,” said investigator Nathan H. Fowler, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

Dr Fowler presented the results of the study at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 7500).

The current standard of care in previously untreated symptomatic FL is immunochemotherapy induction followed by rituximab maintenance.

The immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide has complementary mechanisms with rituximab. Phase 2 studies of combined immunotherapy with lenalidomide and rituximab demonstrated 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 79%-81% in previously untreated FL, Dr Fowler said.

Phase 3 RELEVANCE trial (NCT01650701)

Investigators evaluated 1030 previously untreated grade 1-3a FL patients who required therapy.

Patients in the lenalidomide-rituximab group (n=513) received lenalidomide doses of 20 mg per day on days 2 to 22 and 28 for 6 to 12 cycles. Responders continued on therapy at 10 mg per day for a total of 18 cycles.

The rituximab dose was 375 mg/m² weekly in cycle 1 and day 1 in cycles 2 to 6 and continued in responders for 12 additional cycles.

Patients in the R-chemo arm (n=517) received the investigator’s choice of standard rituximab-CHOP, rituximab-bendamustine, or rituximab-CVP, followed by 12 cycles of rituximab.

Most patients (72%) in the R-chemo arm received R-CHOP.

Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups, Dr Fowler said.

Co-primary endpoints were complete remission/complete remission unconfirmed (CR/Cru) at 120 weeks and PFS.

Results

At a median follow-up of 37.9 months, the superiority for lenalidomide and rituximab over rituximab-chemotherapy was not established.

For the lenalidomide-rituximab patients, the CR/Cru was 48% and 3-year PFS was 77% as compared to 53% and 78%, respectively, for rituximab-chemotherapy patients, as assessed by an independent review committee.

Overall survival was 94% in both groups.

Safety

“Important differences in safety profiles were observed between the arms,” Dr Fowler said.

Rituximab-chemotherapy patients had more frequent neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, growth factor usage, nausea, vomiting, neuropathy, and alopecia.

Lenalidomide and rituximab showed more cutaneous reactions, tumor flare, and diarrhea.

Toxicity profiles differed, with higher grade 4 neutropenia (31% vs 8%) and febrile neutropenia (7% vs 2%) with rituximab-chemotherapy compared with lenalidomide-rituximab, respectively.

More patients experienced grade 3/4 cutaneous events (7% vs 1%) with lenalidomide-rituximab.

Second primary malignancies were slightly higher with rituximab-chemotherapy (10%) than with lenalidomide-rituximab (7%). Grade 5 adverse events were 1% in both groups.

About 70% of patients completed treatment in both groups.

“Lenalidomide and rituximab was not superior to rituximab-chemotherapy based on mature CR/Cru at 120 weeks and interim PFS,” Dr Fowler said. “Both treatments showed similar efficacy results. Treatment effects on PFS were consistent across pre-specified subgroups.”

Dr Fowler presented data as of May 31, 2017. Continued follow-up on PFS and OS is ongoing.

The study is sponsored by Celgene Corporation and the Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation (LYSARC). 

Photo courtesy of Abbvie

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved venetoclax tablets (Venclexta ®) in combination with rituximab to treat patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) who have received 1 prior therapy.

The combination is approved for patients with or without deletion of 17p (del 17p).

The FDA based its approval on the phase 3 MURANO trial, in which venetoclax in combination with rituximab (VEN+R) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in relapsed or refractory CLL patients compared to the chemoimmunotherapy regimen of bendamustine plus rituximab(B+R).

This approval, according to the drug’s developers, makes venetoclax plus rituximab the first oral-based, chemotherapy-free combination with a fixed treatment duration for CLL.

The FDA has also converted venetoclax's accelerated approval to a full approval. The drug was previously granted accelerated approval as a single agent for the treatment of people with CLL with 17p deletion.

Venetoclax is being developed by AbbVie and Roche and jointly commercialized by AbbVie and Genentech in the US and by AbbVie outside the US.

Phase 3 MURANO trial (NCT02005471)

The multicenter, open-label trial randomized 389 patients to VEN+R (194 patients) or B+R (195 patients). Median age of the patients was 65 years (range, 22 – 85).

Patients in the VEN+R arm completed a 5-week ramp-up of venetoclax followed by venetoclax 400 mg once daily for 24 months measured from the rituximab start date.

Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), caused by a rapid reduction in tumor volume, is an identified risk with venetoclax treatment. The dose ramp-up was intended to mitigate this risk.

Rituximab was initiated after venetoclax ramp-up and given for 6 cycles (375 mg/m² intravenously on cycle 1 day 1 and 500 mg/m² intravenously on day 1 of cycles 2-6, with a 28-day cycle length).

Patients in the B+R arm received 6 cycles of B+R (bendamustine 70 mg/m² on days 1 and 2 of each 28-day cycle and rituximab at the above described dose and schedule).

Efficacy was based on PFS as assessed by an independent review committee.

After a median follow-up of 23 months, the median PFS was not reached in the VEN+R arm and was 18.1 months in the B+R arm (P<0.0001).

The overall response rate was 92% for patients treated with VEN+R compared to 72% for those treated with B+R.

Safety

The most common adverse events (AEs) in the VEN+R arms that occurred in 20% or more patients were neutropenia (65%), diarrhea (40%), upper respiratory tract infection (39%), fatigue (22%), cough (22%), and nausea (21%).

Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia developed in 64% of patients, and grade 4 neutropenia in 31%.

Serious adverse events (SAEs) developed in 46% of patients and serious infections in 21%, consisting most frequently of pneumonia (9%).

The incidence of TLS was 3%, occurring in 6 of  194 patients.

In the VEN+R arm, discontinuations due to any AEs occurred in 16% of patients, dose reductions in 15%, and dose interruptions in 71%.

Neutropenia led to dose interruptions in 46% of patients and discontinuations in 3%. Thrombocytopenia led to discontinuations in 3% of patients.

Fatal AEs that occurred in the absence of disease progression and within 30 days of the last VEN+R treatment and/or 90 days of the last rituximab infusion were reported in 2% (4/194) of patients.

In the B+R arm, AEs led to treatment discontinuations in 10% of patients, dose reductions in 15%, and dose interruptions in 40 %.

Investigators previously reported data from the phase 3 MURANO study as a late-breaking abstract at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting and published the findings in NEJM.

John Seymour, MBBS, PhD, lead investigator of the MURANO study, said in the corporate release, the approval "validates the results seen in the phase 3 trial, including the significant improvement in progression-free survival over a standard of care comparator arm."

"Progression-free survival is considered a gold standard for demonstrating clinical benefit in oncology," he added.

Full prescribing information for venetoclax is available here. 

Photo courtesy of Abbvie

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved venetoclax tablets (Venclexta ®) in combination with rituximab to treat patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) who have received 1 prior therapy.

The combination is approved for patients with or without deletion of 17p (del 17p).

The FDA based its approval on the phase 3 MURANO trial, in which venetoclax in combination with rituximab (VEN+R) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in relapsed or refractory CLL patients compared to the chemoimmunotherapy regimen of bendamustine plus rituximab(B+R).

This approval, according to the drug’s developers, makes venetoclax plus rituximab the first oral-based, chemotherapy-free combination with a fixed treatment duration for CLL.

The FDA has also converted venetoclax's accelerated approval to a full approval. The drug was previously granted accelerated approval as a single agent for the treatment of people with CLL with 17p deletion.

Venetoclax is being developed by AbbVie and Roche and jointly commercialized by AbbVie and Genentech in the US and by AbbVie outside the US.

Phase 3 MURANO trial (NCT02005471)

The multicenter, open-label trial randomized 389 patients to VEN+R (194 patients) or B+R (195 patients). Median age of the patients was 65 years (range, 22 – 85).

Patients in the VEN+R arm completed a 5-week ramp-up of venetoclax followed by venetoclax 400 mg once daily for 24 months measured from the rituximab start date.

Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), caused by a rapid reduction in tumor volume, is an identified risk with venetoclax treatment. The dose ramp-up was intended to mitigate this risk.

Rituximab was initiated after venetoclax ramp-up and given for 6 cycles (375 mg/m² intravenously on cycle 1 day 1 and 500 mg/m² intravenously on day 1 of cycles 2-6, with a 28-day cycle length).

Patients in the B+R arm received 6 cycles of B+R (bendamustine 70 mg/m² on days 1 and 2 of each 28-day cycle and rituximab at the above described dose and schedule).

Efficacy was based on PFS as assessed by an independent review committee.

After a median follow-up of 23 months, the median PFS was not reached in the VEN+R arm and was 18.1 months in the B+R arm (P<0.0001).

The overall response rate was 92% for patients treated with VEN+R compared to 72% for those treated with B+R.

Safety

The most common adverse events (AEs) in the VEN+R arms that occurred in 20% or more patients were neutropenia (65%), diarrhea (40%), upper respiratory tract infection (39%), fatigue (22%), cough (22%), and nausea (21%).

Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia developed in 64% of patients, and grade 4 neutropenia in 31%.

Serious adverse events (SAEs) developed in 46% of patients and serious infections in 21%, consisting most frequently of pneumonia (9%).

The incidence of TLS was 3%, occurring in 6 of  194 patients.

In the VEN+R arm, discontinuations due to any AEs occurred in 16% of patients, dose reductions in 15%, and dose interruptions in 71%.

Neutropenia led to dose interruptions in 46% of patients and discontinuations in 3%. Thrombocytopenia led to discontinuations in 3% of patients.

Fatal AEs that occurred in the absence of disease progression and within 30 days of the last VEN+R treatment and/or 90 days of the last rituximab infusion were reported in 2% (4/194) of patients.

In the B+R arm, AEs led to treatment discontinuations in 10% of patients, dose reductions in 15%, and dose interruptions in 40 %.

Investigators previously reported data from the phase 3 MURANO study as a late-breaking abstract at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting and published the findings in NEJM.

John Seymour, MBBS, PhD, lead investigator of the MURANO study, said in the corporate release, the approval "validates the results seen in the phase 3 trial, including the significant improvement in progression-free survival over a standard of care comparator arm."

"Progression-free survival is considered a gold standard for demonstrating clinical benefit in oncology," he added.

Full prescribing information for venetoclax is available here. 

Photo courtesy of Abbvie

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved venetoclax tablets (Venclexta ®) in combination with rituximab to treat patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) who have received 1 prior therapy.

The combination is approved for patients with or without deletion of 17p (del 17p).

The FDA based its approval on the phase 3 MURANO trial, in which venetoclax in combination with rituximab (VEN+R) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in relapsed or refractory CLL patients compared to the chemoimmunotherapy regimen of bendamustine plus rituximab(B+R).

This approval, according to the drug’s developers, makes venetoclax plus rituximab the first oral-based, chemotherapy-free combination with a fixed treatment duration for CLL.

The FDA has also converted venetoclax's accelerated approval to a full approval. The drug was previously granted accelerated approval as a single agent for the treatment of people with CLL with 17p deletion.

Venetoclax is being developed by AbbVie and Roche and jointly commercialized by AbbVie and Genentech in the US and by AbbVie outside the US.

Phase 3 MURANO trial (NCT02005471)

The multicenter, open-label trial randomized 389 patients to VEN+R (194 patients) or B+R (195 patients). Median age of the patients was 65 years (range, 22 – 85).

Patients in the VEN+R arm completed a 5-week ramp-up of venetoclax followed by venetoclax 400 mg once daily for 24 months measured from the rituximab start date.

Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), caused by a rapid reduction in tumor volume, is an identified risk with venetoclax treatment. The dose ramp-up was intended to mitigate this risk.

Rituximab was initiated after venetoclax ramp-up and given for 6 cycles (375 mg/m² intravenously on cycle 1 day 1 and 500 mg/m² intravenously on day 1 of cycles 2-6, with a 28-day cycle length).

Patients in the B+R arm received 6 cycles of B+R (bendamustine 70 mg/m² on days 1 and 2 of each 28-day cycle and rituximab at the above described dose and schedule).

Efficacy was based on PFS as assessed by an independent review committee.

After a median follow-up of 23 months, the median PFS was not reached in the VEN+R arm and was 18.1 months in the B+R arm (P<0.0001).

The overall response rate was 92% for patients treated with VEN+R compared to 72% for those treated with B+R.

Safety

The most common adverse events (AEs) in the VEN+R arms that occurred in 20% or more patients were neutropenia (65%), diarrhea (40%), upper respiratory tract infection (39%), fatigue (22%), cough (22%), and nausea (21%).

Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia developed in 64% of patients, and grade 4 neutropenia in 31%.

Serious adverse events (SAEs) developed in 46% of patients and serious infections in 21%, consisting most frequently of pneumonia (9%).

The incidence of TLS was 3%, occurring in 6 of  194 patients.

In the VEN+R arm, discontinuations due to any AEs occurred in 16% of patients, dose reductions in 15%, and dose interruptions in 71%.

Neutropenia led to dose interruptions in 46% of patients and discontinuations in 3%. Thrombocytopenia led to discontinuations in 3% of patients.

Fatal AEs that occurred in the absence of disease progression and within 30 days of the last VEN+R treatment and/or 90 days of the last rituximab infusion were reported in 2% (4/194) of patients.

In the B+R arm, AEs led to treatment discontinuations in 10% of patients, dose reductions in 15%, and dose interruptions in 40 %.

Investigators previously reported data from the phase 3 MURANO study as a late-breaking abstract at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting and published the findings in NEJM.

John Seymour, MBBS, PhD, lead investigator of the MURANO study, said in the corporate release, the approval "validates the results seen in the phase 3 trial, including the significant improvement in progression-free survival over a standard of care comparator arm."

"Progression-free survival is considered a gold standard for demonstrating clinical benefit in oncology," he added.

Full prescribing information for venetoclax is available here. 

Attendees at ASCO 2018 ©ASCO/Zach Boyden-Holmes 2018

CHICAGO—Polatuzumab vedotin, when added to bendamustine (B) and rituximab (R), significantly improved response and survival rates in a cohort of patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), according to a phase 2 study.

By contrast, there were no such improvements in a cohort of follicular lymphoma (FL) patients, at least in short-term follow-up, investigator Laurie Helen Sehn, MD, of the BC Cancer Agency in Vancouver, Canada, said at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting.

However, the improvement in overall survival in DLBCL patients is “remarkable,” Dr Sehn affirmed in an oral presentation (abstract 7507).

“Based on these encouraging results, polatuzumab vedotin has received breakthrough therapy designation and priority medicines designation by the FDA and EMA for patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL,” she said.

Polatuzumab-BR study (NCT02257567)

The study by Dr Sehn and colleagues included a cohort of 80 DLBCL patients randomized to BR or polatuzumab-BR for 6 planned 21-day cycles.

Investigators randomized another cohort of 80 FL patients to BR or polatuzumab-BR for 6 planned 28-day cycles.

The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) assessed by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) at 6 to 8 weeks after the end of treatment.

DLBCL patients

A total of 40% of polatuzumab-BR-treated DLBCL patients achieved CR at the end of treatment, versus 15% of BR-treated patients (P=0.012).

That CR improvement translated into a significantly higher progression-free survival (PFS) (6.7 months for polatuzumab-BR vs 2.0 months for BR, P<0.0001) and overall survival (11.8 months versus 4.7 months, P=0.0008), according to Dr Sehn.

The FDG-PET CR rates were higher in the polatuzumab-BR arm regardless of the number of prior lines of treatment for DLBCL, and regardless of relapsed versus refractory status, Dr. Sehn added.

FL patients

By contrast, in the FL cohort, the FDG-PET CR rate was high for both arms, at 69% for polatuzumab-BR and 63% for BR.

And there was no significant difference in progression-free survival (P=0.58) with “relatively short-term follow-up,” she said.

Adverse events

The most common grades 3 – 5 adverse events for both DLBCL and FL patients were higher in the polatuzumab-BR arm than the BR arm and included cytopenias, febrile neutropenia, and infections.

Serious AEs were also higher in the polatuzumab-BR arm and included febrile neutropenia for both FL and DLBCL patients and infection for FL patients.

Five percent of FL patients and 18% of DLBCL had a grade 5 event.

Commentary

Whether polatuzumab vedotin will change treatment paradigms for DLBCL patients may be answered by the ongoing POLARIX study, according to Alison Moskowitz, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, NY.

The randomized phase 3 POLARIX study (abstract TPS7589) is comparing polatuzumab plus R-CHP to R-CHOP in patients with previously untreated DLBCL.

“Certainly, there are patients who do very well with R-CHOP chemotherapy alone, and so we need to learn whether this is necessary for all patients, or only the high-risk patients,” Dr Moskowitz said in a talk at ASCO commenting on the results of the polatuzumab-BR study.

Hoffman-LaRoche is the sponsor of the study. 

Attendees at ASCO 2018 ©ASCO/Zach Boyden-Holmes 2018

CHICAGO—Polatuzumab vedotin, when added to bendamustine (B) and rituximab (R), significantly improved response and survival rates in a cohort of patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), according to a phase 2 study.

By contrast, there were no such improvements in a cohort of follicular lymphoma (FL) patients, at least in short-term follow-up, investigator Laurie Helen Sehn, MD, of the BC Cancer Agency in Vancouver, Canada, said at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting.

However, the improvement in overall survival in DLBCL patients is “remarkable,” Dr Sehn affirmed in an oral presentation (abstract 7507).

“Based on these encouraging results, polatuzumab vedotin has received breakthrough therapy designation and priority medicines designation by the FDA and EMA for patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL,” she said.

Polatuzumab-BR study (NCT02257567)

The study by Dr Sehn and colleagues included a cohort of 80 DLBCL patients randomized to BR or polatuzumab-BR for 6 planned 21-day cycles.

Investigators randomized another cohort of 80 FL patients to BR or polatuzumab-BR for 6 planned 28-day cycles.

The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) assessed by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) at 6 to 8 weeks after the end of treatment.

DLBCL patients

A total of 40% of polatuzumab-BR-treated DLBCL patients achieved CR at the end of treatment, versus 15% of BR-treated patients (P=0.012).

That CR improvement translated into a significantly higher progression-free survival (PFS) (6.7 months for polatuzumab-BR vs 2.0 months for BR, P<0.0001) and overall survival (11.8 months versus 4.7 months, P=0.0008), according to Dr Sehn.

The FDG-PET CR rates were higher in the polatuzumab-BR arm regardless of the number of prior lines of treatment for DLBCL, and regardless of relapsed versus refractory status, Dr. Sehn added.

FL patients

By contrast, in the FL cohort, the FDG-PET CR rate was high for both arms, at 69% for polatuzumab-BR and 63% for BR.

And there was no significant difference in progression-free survival (P=0.58) with “relatively short-term follow-up,” she said.

Adverse events

The most common grades 3 – 5 adverse events for both DLBCL and FL patients were higher in the polatuzumab-BR arm than the BR arm and included cytopenias, febrile neutropenia, and infections.

Serious AEs were also higher in the polatuzumab-BR arm and included febrile neutropenia for both FL and DLBCL patients and infection for FL patients.

Five percent of FL patients and 18% of DLBCL had a grade 5 event.

Commentary

Whether polatuzumab vedotin will change treatment paradigms for DLBCL patients may be answered by the ongoing POLARIX study, according to Alison Moskowitz, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, NY.

The randomized phase 3 POLARIX study (abstract TPS7589) is comparing polatuzumab plus R-CHP to R-CHOP in patients with previously untreated DLBCL.

“Certainly, there are patients who do very well with R-CHOP chemotherapy alone, and so we need to learn whether this is necessary for all patients, or only the high-risk patients,” Dr Moskowitz said in a talk at ASCO commenting on the results of the polatuzumab-BR study.

Hoffman-LaRoche is the sponsor of the study. 

Attendees at ASCO 2018 ©ASCO/Zach Boyden-Holmes 2018

CHICAGO—Polatuzumab vedotin, when added to bendamustine (B) and rituximab (R), significantly improved response and survival rates in a cohort of patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), according to a phase 2 study.

By contrast, there were no such improvements in a cohort of follicular lymphoma (FL) patients, at least in short-term follow-up, investigator Laurie Helen Sehn, MD, of the BC Cancer Agency in Vancouver, Canada, said at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting.

However, the improvement in overall survival in DLBCL patients is “remarkable,” Dr Sehn affirmed in an oral presentation (abstract 7507).

“Based on these encouraging results, polatuzumab vedotin has received breakthrough therapy designation and priority medicines designation by the FDA and EMA for patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL,” she said.

Polatuzumab-BR study (NCT02257567)

The study by Dr Sehn and colleagues included a cohort of 80 DLBCL patients randomized to BR or polatuzumab-BR for 6 planned 21-day cycles.

Investigators randomized another cohort of 80 FL patients to BR or polatuzumab-BR for 6 planned 28-day cycles.

The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) assessed by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) at 6 to 8 weeks after the end of treatment.

DLBCL patients

A total of 40% of polatuzumab-BR-treated DLBCL patients achieved CR at the end of treatment, versus 15% of BR-treated patients (P=0.012).

That CR improvement translated into a significantly higher progression-free survival (PFS) (6.7 months for polatuzumab-BR vs 2.0 months for BR, P<0.0001) and overall survival (11.8 months versus 4.7 months, P=0.0008), according to Dr Sehn.

The FDG-PET CR rates were higher in the polatuzumab-BR arm regardless of the number of prior lines of treatment for DLBCL, and regardless of relapsed versus refractory status, Dr. Sehn added.

FL patients

By contrast, in the FL cohort, the FDG-PET CR rate was high for both arms, at 69% for polatuzumab-BR and 63% for BR.

And there was no significant difference in progression-free survival (P=0.58) with “relatively short-term follow-up,” she said.

Adverse events

The most common grades 3 – 5 adverse events for both DLBCL and FL patients were higher in the polatuzumab-BR arm than the BR arm and included cytopenias, febrile neutropenia, and infections.

Serious AEs were also higher in the polatuzumab-BR arm and included febrile neutropenia for both FL and DLBCL patients and infection for FL patients.

Five percent of FL patients and 18% of DLBCL had a grade 5 event.

Commentary

Whether polatuzumab vedotin will change treatment paradigms for DLBCL patients may be answered by the ongoing POLARIX study, according to Alison Moskowitz, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, NY.

The randomized phase 3 POLARIX study (abstract TPS7589) is comparing polatuzumab plus R-CHP to R-CHOP in patients with previously untreated DLBCL.

“Certainly, there are patients who do very well with R-CHOP chemotherapy alone, and so we need to learn whether this is necessary for all patients, or only the high-risk patients,” Dr Moskowitz said in a talk at ASCO commenting on the results of the polatuzumab-BR study.

Hoffman-LaRoche is the sponsor of the study. 

©ASCO/Rodney White 2018

CHICAGO—Acalabrutinib monotherapy was highly effective in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM) in a phase 2 study, investigator Roger Owen, MD, reported at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting.

The BTK inhibitor was effective in both treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory patients, with overall response rates for both groups in excess of 90%, and “amazing” major response rates—partial response or better—of approximately 80%, Dr Owen said.

Dr Owen, of the St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust in Leeds, UK, reported the findings as abstract 7501.*

Durations of response were excellent, according to Dr Owen, who also reported 2-year progression-free survival of 90% in treatment-naïve patients and 82% in relapsed/refractory patients.

The safety profile was favorable, with most adverse events of low grade, and a very limited number of dropouts due to adverse events, according to the investigator.

“I think this study clearly demonstrates the highly effective nature of acalabrutinib in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia,” Dr Owen stated.

 Acalabrutinib is a selective BTK inhibitor with minimal off-target activity, he said. The BTK inhibitor ibrutinib also has demonstrated activity in Waldenström’s, but has been associated with toxicities such as atrial fibrillation and bleeding, he noted.

In this phase 2 acalabrutinib study (NCT02180724), which included 14 treatment-naïve and 92 relapsed/refractory patients, atrial fibrillation occurred in 5 patients. However, 4 of those cases were grade 1-2, and only one was grade 3, according to Dr Owen.

Investigators observed grade 3 hypertension in 3 relapsed/refractory patients.

Bleeding events occurred in more than half of patients, though only 3 of those events were grade 3, and no patient discontinued treatment due to a bleeding episode.

These efficacy results are “impressive,” and the fact that very few cardiac events were seen is important, said Bruce D. Cheson, MD, of Georgetown University Medical Center in Washington, DC.

Dr Cheson commented on the acalabrutinib results in his presentation during ASCO on non-chemotherapy treatments for lymphoid malignancies.

 “One can construct a non-chemo algorithm now for Waldenström’s, for patients who are MYD88 mutated, which is more than 90% of patients,” he said. “Right now ibrutinib, and perhaps in the future acalabrutinib, can be the initial therapy with or without rituximab based on the results of ongoing trials.”

However, single non-chemotherapy agents will not be sufficient to achieve cure of lymphoid malignancies, Dr Cheson added.

“We need to carefully develop rational combinations, identifying biomarkers for response, for resistance, for toxicity,” he said.

The study was sponsored by Acerta Pharma BV. 

*Data presented at the meeting differ from the abstract.

©ASCO/Rodney White 2018

CHICAGO—Acalabrutinib monotherapy was highly effective in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM) in a phase 2 study, investigator Roger Owen, MD, reported at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting.

The BTK inhibitor was effective in both treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory patients, with overall response rates for both groups in excess of 90%, and “amazing” major response rates—partial response or better—of approximately 80%, Dr Owen said.

Dr Owen, of the St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust in Leeds, UK, reported the findings as abstract 7501.*

Durations of response were excellent, according to Dr Owen, who also reported 2-year progression-free survival of 90% in treatment-naïve patients and 82% in relapsed/refractory patients.

The safety profile was favorable, with most adverse events of low grade, and a very limited number of dropouts due to adverse events, according to the investigator.

“I think this study clearly demonstrates the highly effective nature of acalabrutinib in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia,” Dr Owen stated.

 Acalabrutinib is a selective BTK inhibitor with minimal off-target activity, he said. The BTK inhibitor ibrutinib also has demonstrated activity in Waldenström’s, but has been associated with toxicities such as atrial fibrillation and bleeding, he noted.

In this phase 2 acalabrutinib study (NCT02180724), which included 14 treatment-naïve and 92 relapsed/refractory patients, atrial fibrillation occurred in 5 patients. However, 4 of those cases were grade 1-2, and only one was grade 3, according to Dr Owen.

Investigators observed grade 3 hypertension in 3 relapsed/refractory patients.

Bleeding events occurred in more than half of patients, though only 3 of those events were grade 3, and no patient discontinued treatment due to a bleeding episode.

These efficacy results are “impressive,” and the fact that very few cardiac events were seen is important, said Bruce D. Cheson, MD, of Georgetown University Medical Center in Washington, DC.

Dr Cheson commented on the acalabrutinib results in his presentation during ASCO on non-chemotherapy treatments for lymphoid malignancies.

 “One can construct a non-chemo algorithm now for Waldenström’s, for patients who are MYD88 mutated, which is more than 90% of patients,” he said. “Right now ibrutinib, and perhaps in the future acalabrutinib, can be the initial therapy with or without rituximab based on the results of ongoing trials.”

However, single non-chemotherapy agents will not be sufficient to achieve cure of lymphoid malignancies, Dr Cheson added.

“We need to carefully develop rational combinations, identifying biomarkers for response, for resistance, for toxicity,” he said.

The study was sponsored by Acerta Pharma BV. 

*Data presented at the meeting differ from the abstract.

©ASCO/Rodney White 2018

CHICAGO—Acalabrutinib monotherapy was highly effective in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM) in a phase 2 study, investigator Roger Owen, MD, reported at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting.

The BTK inhibitor was effective in both treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory patients, with overall response rates for both groups in excess of 90%, and “amazing” major response rates—partial response or better—of approximately 80%, Dr Owen said.

Dr Owen, of the St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust in Leeds, UK, reported the findings as abstract 7501.*

Durations of response were excellent, according to Dr Owen, who also reported 2-year progression-free survival of 90% in treatment-naïve patients and 82% in relapsed/refractory patients.

The safety profile was favorable, with most adverse events of low grade, and a very limited number of dropouts due to adverse events, according to the investigator.

“I think this study clearly demonstrates the highly effective nature of acalabrutinib in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia,” Dr Owen stated.

 Acalabrutinib is a selective BTK inhibitor with minimal off-target activity, he said. The BTK inhibitor ibrutinib also has demonstrated activity in Waldenström’s, but has been associated with toxicities such as atrial fibrillation and bleeding, he noted.

In this phase 2 acalabrutinib study (NCT02180724), which included 14 treatment-naïve and 92 relapsed/refractory patients, atrial fibrillation occurred in 5 patients. However, 4 of those cases were grade 1-2, and only one was grade 3, according to Dr Owen.

Investigators observed grade 3 hypertension in 3 relapsed/refractory patients.

Bleeding events occurred in more than half of patients, though only 3 of those events were grade 3, and no patient discontinued treatment due to a bleeding episode.

These efficacy results are “impressive,” and the fact that very few cardiac events were seen is important, said Bruce D. Cheson, MD, of Georgetown University Medical Center in Washington, DC.

Dr Cheson commented on the acalabrutinib results in his presentation during ASCO on non-chemotherapy treatments for lymphoid malignancies.

 “One can construct a non-chemo algorithm now for Waldenström’s, for patients who are MYD88 mutated, which is more than 90% of patients,” he said. “Right now ibrutinib, and perhaps in the future acalabrutinib, can be the initial therapy with or without rituximab based on the results of ongoing trials.”

However, single non-chemotherapy agents will not be sufficient to achieve cure of lymphoid malignancies, Dr Cheson added.

“We need to carefully develop rational combinations, identifying biomarkers for response, for resistance, for toxicity,” he said.

The study was sponsored by Acerta Pharma BV. 

*Data presented at the meeting differ from the abstract.