User login
Allele associated with poor outcome in CLL
A form of the CYP3A7 gene is associated with poor outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and other cancers, according to a study published in Cancer Research.
Among patients with CLL, breast cancer, or lung cancer, those with the CYP3A7*1C allele were more likely than those without it to experience disease progression or death.
Researchers believe this may be related to how patients metabolize treatment.
“The CYP3A7 gene encodes an enzyme that breaks down all sorts of naturally occurring substances—such as sex steroids like estrogen and testosterone—as well as a wide range of drugs that are used in the treatment of cancer,” said Olivia Fletcher, PhD, of The Institute of Cancer Research in London, UK.
“The CYP3A7 gene is normally turned on in an embryo and then turned off shortly after a baby is born, but individuals who have 1 or more copies of the CYP3A7*1C form of the gene turn on their CYP3A7 gene in adult life.”
“We found that individuals with breast cancer, lung cancer, or CLL who carry 1 or more copies of the CYP3A7*1C allele tend to have worse outcomes. One possibility is that these patients break down the drugs that they are given to treat their cancer too fast. However, further independent studies that replicate our findings in larger numbers of patients and rule out biases are needed before we could recommend any changes to the treatment that cancer patients with the CYP3A7*1C allele receive.”
To assess the impact of the CYP3A7*1C allele on patient outcomes, Dr Fletcher and her colleagues analyzed DNA samples from 1008 breast cancer patients, 1142 patients with lung cancer, and 356 patients with CLL.
The team looked for the presence of the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs45446698. Dr Fletcher explained that rs45446698 is 1 of 7 SNPs that cluster together to form the CYP3A7*1C allele.
The researchers found that, among CLL patients, rs45446698 (and, therefore, the CYP3A7*1C allele) was associated with a 62% increased risk of disease progression (P=0.03).
Among breast cancer patients, rs45446698 was associated with a 74% increased risk of breast cancer mortality (P=0.03). And among the lung cancer patients, the SNP was associated with a 43% increased risk of death from any cause (P=0.009).
The researchers also found borderline evidence of a statistical interaction between the CYP3A7*1C allele, treatment of patients with a cytotoxic agent that is a CYP3A substrate, and clinical outcome (P=0.06).
“Even though we did not see a statistically significant difference when stratifying patients by treatment with a CYP3A7 substrate, the fact that we see the same effect in 3 very different cancer types suggests to me that it is more likely to be something to do with treatment than the disease itself,” Dr Fletcher said.
“However, we are looking at ways of replicating these results in additional cohorts of patients and types of cancer, as well as overcoming the limitations of this study.”
Dr Fletcher explained that the main limitation of this study is that the researchers used samples and clinical information collected for other studies. So they did not have the same clinical information for each patient, and the samples were collected at different time points and for patients treated with various drugs.
She also noted that the researchers were not able to determine how quickly the patients broke down their treatments.
This study was supported by Sanofi-Aventis, Breast Cancer Now, Bloodwise, Cancer Research UK, the Medical Research Council, the Cridlan Trust, and the Helen Rollason Cancer Charity. The authors’ institutions received funding from the National Health Service of the United Kingdom. 
A form of the CYP3A7 gene is associated with poor outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and other cancers, according to a study published in Cancer Research.
Among patients with CLL, breast cancer, or lung cancer, those with the CYP3A7*1C allele were more likely than those without it to experience disease progression or death.
Researchers believe this may be related to how patients metabolize treatment.
“The CYP3A7 gene encodes an enzyme that breaks down all sorts of naturally occurring substances—such as sex steroids like estrogen and testosterone—as well as a wide range of drugs that are used in the treatment of cancer,” said Olivia Fletcher, PhD, of The Institute of Cancer Research in London, UK.
“The CYP3A7 gene is normally turned on in an embryo and then turned off shortly after a baby is born, but individuals who have 1 or more copies of the CYP3A7*1C form of the gene turn on their CYP3A7 gene in adult life.”
“We found that individuals with breast cancer, lung cancer, or CLL who carry 1 or more copies of the CYP3A7*1C allele tend to have worse outcomes. One possibility is that these patients break down the drugs that they are given to treat their cancer too fast. However, further independent studies that replicate our findings in larger numbers of patients and rule out biases are needed before we could recommend any changes to the treatment that cancer patients with the CYP3A7*1C allele receive.”
To assess the impact of the CYP3A7*1C allele on patient outcomes, Dr Fletcher and her colleagues analyzed DNA samples from 1008 breast cancer patients, 1142 patients with lung cancer, and 356 patients with CLL.
The team looked for the presence of the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs45446698. Dr Fletcher explained that rs45446698 is 1 of 7 SNPs that cluster together to form the CYP3A7*1C allele.
The researchers found that, among CLL patients, rs45446698 (and, therefore, the CYP3A7*1C allele) was associated with a 62% increased risk of disease progression (P=0.03).
Among breast cancer patients, rs45446698 was associated with a 74% increased risk of breast cancer mortality (P=0.03). And among the lung cancer patients, the SNP was associated with a 43% increased risk of death from any cause (P=0.009).
The researchers also found borderline evidence of a statistical interaction between the CYP3A7*1C allele, treatment of patients with a cytotoxic agent that is a CYP3A substrate, and clinical outcome (P=0.06).
“Even though we did not see a statistically significant difference when stratifying patients by treatment with a CYP3A7 substrate, the fact that we see the same effect in 3 very different cancer types suggests to me that it is more likely to be something to do with treatment than the disease itself,” Dr Fletcher said.
“However, we are looking at ways of replicating these results in additional cohorts of patients and types of cancer, as well as overcoming the limitations of this study.”
Dr Fletcher explained that the main limitation of this study is that the researchers used samples and clinical information collected for other studies. So they did not have the same clinical information for each patient, and the samples were collected at different time points and for patients treated with various drugs.
She also noted that the researchers were not able to determine how quickly the patients broke down their treatments.
This study was supported by Sanofi-Aventis, Breast Cancer Now, Bloodwise, Cancer Research UK, the Medical Research Council, the Cridlan Trust, and the Helen Rollason Cancer Charity. The authors’ institutions received funding from the National Health Service of the United Kingdom.
A form of the CYP3A7 gene is associated with poor outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and other cancers, according to a study published in Cancer Research.
Among patients with CLL, breast cancer, or lung cancer, those with the CYP3A7*1C allele were more likely than those without it to experience disease progression or death.
Researchers believe this may be related to how patients metabolize treatment.
“The CYP3A7 gene encodes an enzyme that breaks down all sorts of naturally occurring substances—such as sex steroids like estrogen and testosterone—as well as a wide range of drugs that are used in the treatment of cancer,” said Olivia Fletcher, PhD, of The Institute of Cancer Research in London, UK.
“The CYP3A7 gene is normally turned on in an embryo and then turned off shortly after a baby is born, but individuals who have 1 or more copies of the CYP3A7*1C form of the gene turn on their CYP3A7 gene in adult life.”
“We found that individuals with breast cancer, lung cancer, or CLL who carry 1 or more copies of the CYP3A7*1C allele tend to have worse outcomes. One possibility is that these patients break down the drugs that they are given to treat their cancer too fast. However, further independent studies that replicate our findings in larger numbers of patients and rule out biases are needed before we could recommend any changes to the treatment that cancer patients with the CYP3A7*1C allele receive.”
To assess the impact of the CYP3A7*1C allele on patient outcomes, Dr Fletcher and her colleagues analyzed DNA samples from 1008 breast cancer patients, 1142 patients with lung cancer, and 356 patients with CLL.
The team looked for the presence of the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs45446698. Dr Fletcher explained that rs45446698 is 1 of 7 SNPs that cluster together to form the CYP3A7*1C allele.
The researchers found that, among CLL patients, rs45446698 (and, therefore, the CYP3A7*1C allele) was associated with a 62% increased risk of disease progression (P=0.03).
Among breast cancer patients, rs45446698 was associated with a 74% increased risk of breast cancer mortality (P=0.03). And among the lung cancer patients, the SNP was associated with a 43% increased risk of death from any cause (P=0.009).
The researchers also found borderline evidence of a statistical interaction between the CYP3A7*1C allele, treatment of patients with a cytotoxic agent that is a CYP3A substrate, and clinical outcome (P=0.06).
“Even though we did not see a statistically significant difference when stratifying patients by treatment with a CYP3A7 substrate, the fact that we see the same effect in 3 very different cancer types suggests to me that it is more likely to be something to do with treatment than the disease itself,” Dr Fletcher said.
“However, we are looking at ways of replicating these results in additional cohorts of patients and types of cancer, as well as overcoming the limitations of this study.”
Dr Fletcher explained that the main limitation of this study is that the researchers used samples and clinical information collected for other studies. So they did not have the same clinical information for each patient, and the samples were collected at different time points and for patients treated with various drugs.
She also noted that the researchers were not able to determine how quickly the patients broke down their treatments.
This study was supported by Sanofi-Aventis, Breast Cancer Now, Bloodwise, Cancer Research UK, the Medical Research Council, the Cridlan Trust, and the Helen Rollason Cancer Charity. The authors’ institutions received funding from the National Health Service of the United Kingdom.
FDA lifts partial clinical hold on pidilizumab
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has lifted the partial clinical hold on the investigational new drug (IND) application for pidilizumab (MDV9300) in hematologic malignancies.
This means the phase 2 trial of pidilizumab in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), as well as other studies that cross-reference the IND for the drug, may now proceed.
The partial clinical hold on pidilizumab was not related to any safety concerns.
The FDA placed the hold because the company developing pidilizumab, Medivation Inc., determined that the drug is not an inhibitor of PD-1, as researchers previously thought.
The phase 2 trial of pidilizumab in DLBCL was launched in late 2015 but had not enrolled any patients before the FDA placed the partial clinical hold.
Patients who were receiving pidilizumab through investigator-sponsored trials have continued to receive treatment despite the hold, and those investigators have been told to update their protocols and informed consent documents to reflect that pidilizumab is not an anti-PD-1 antibody.
Medivation has likewise revised the investigator brochure, protocols, and informed consent documents related to the phase 2 trial of DLBCL patients.
The company said it is still trying to determine pidilizumab’s mechanism of action.
“We are delighted that the FDA has lifted the partial clinical hold and that we may proceed with our potentially pivotal trial in this area of high unmet medical need,” said David Hung, MD, founder, president, and chief executive officer of Medivation.
“As we move forward, we also are working to determine the compound’s exact binding mechanism which, we believe, modulates the body’s innate immune response and differentiates it from the heavily crowded immuno-oncology space that targets the adaptive side of immunity.”
Medivation said it intends to submit an amendment to the Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls section of the IND for pidilizumab to provide for larger manufacturing lot sizes to better support the current and planned clinical activities for the drug.
The company also said it plans to resume the phase 2 trial of pidilizumab in DLBLCL in the second half of this year.
The trial is expected to enroll approximately 180 patients who had an incomplete response to salvage therapy or autologous stem cell transplant for relapsed or refractory CD20+ DLBCL, transformed indolent lymphoma, or primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma.
The patients will be assessed in 2 parallel cohorts of approximately 90 patients each. One cohort will enroll patients who have received an autologous stem cell transplant, and the other will enroll patients who have received salvage chemotherapy but are ineligible for transplant.
Pidilizumab will be given at a dose of 200 mg by intravenous infusion. The primary endpoint of the trial is best overall response rate.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has lifted the partial clinical hold on the investigational new drug (IND) application for pidilizumab (MDV9300) in hematologic malignancies.
This means the phase 2 trial of pidilizumab in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), as well as other studies that cross-reference the IND for the drug, may now proceed.
The partial clinical hold on pidilizumab was not related to any safety concerns.
The FDA placed the hold because the company developing pidilizumab, Medivation Inc., determined that the drug is not an inhibitor of PD-1, as researchers previously thought.
The phase 2 trial of pidilizumab in DLBCL was launched in late 2015 but had not enrolled any patients before the FDA placed the partial clinical hold.
Patients who were receiving pidilizumab through investigator-sponsored trials have continued to receive treatment despite the hold, and those investigators have been told to update their protocols and informed consent documents to reflect that pidilizumab is not an anti-PD-1 antibody.
Medivation has likewise revised the investigator brochure, protocols, and informed consent documents related to the phase 2 trial of DLBCL patients.
The company said it is still trying to determine pidilizumab’s mechanism of action.
“We are delighted that the FDA has lifted the partial clinical hold and that we may proceed with our potentially pivotal trial in this area of high unmet medical need,” said David Hung, MD, founder, president, and chief executive officer of Medivation.
“As we move forward, we also are working to determine the compound’s exact binding mechanism which, we believe, modulates the body’s innate immune response and differentiates it from the heavily crowded immuno-oncology space that targets the adaptive side of immunity.”
Medivation said it intends to submit an amendment to the Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls section of the IND for pidilizumab to provide for larger manufacturing lot sizes to better support the current and planned clinical activities for the drug.
The company also said it plans to resume the phase 2 trial of pidilizumab in DLBLCL in the second half of this year.
The trial is expected to enroll approximately 180 patients who had an incomplete response to salvage therapy or autologous stem cell transplant for relapsed or refractory CD20+ DLBCL, transformed indolent lymphoma, or primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma.
The patients will be assessed in 2 parallel cohorts of approximately 90 patients each. One cohort will enroll patients who have received an autologous stem cell transplant, and the other will enroll patients who have received salvage chemotherapy but are ineligible for transplant.
Pidilizumab will be given at a dose of 200 mg by intravenous infusion. The primary endpoint of the trial is best overall response rate.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has lifted the partial clinical hold on the investigational new drug (IND) application for pidilizumab (MDV9300) in hematologic malignancies.
This means the phase 2 trial of pidilizumab in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), as well as other studies that cross-reference the IND for the drug, may now proceed.
The partial clinical hold on pidilizumab was not related to any safety concerns.
The FDA placed the hold because the company developing pidilizumab, Medivation Inc., determined that the drug is not an inhibitor of PD-1, as researchers previously thought.
The phase 2 trial of pidilizumab in DLBCL was launched in late 2015 but had not enrolled any patients before the FDA placed the partial clinical hold.
Patients who were receiving pidilizumab through investigator-sponsored trials have continued to receive treatment despite the hold, and those investigators have been told to update their protocols and informed consent documents to reflect that pidilizumab is not an anti-PD-1 antibody.
Medivation has likewise revised the investigator brochure, protocols, and informed consent documents related to the phase 2 trial of DLBCL patients.
The company said it is still trying to determine pidilizumab’s mechanism of action.
“We are delighted that the FDA has lifted the partial clinical hold and that we may proceed with our potentially pivotal trial in this area of high unmet medical need,” said David Hung, MD, founder, president, and chief executive officer of Medivation.
“As we move forward, we also are working to determine the compound’s exact binding mechanism which, we believe, modulates the body’s innate immune response and differentiates it from the heavily crowded immuno-oncology space that targets the adaptive side of immunity.”
Medivation said it intends to submit an amendment to the Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls section of the IND for pidilizumab to provide for larger manufacturing lot sizes to better support the current and planned clinical activities for the drug.
The company also said it plans to resume the phase 2 trial of pidilizumab in DLBLCL in the second half of this year.
The trial is expected to enroll approximately 180 patients who had an incomplete response to salvage therapy or autologous stem cell transplant for relapsed or refractory CD20+ DLBCL, transformed indolent lymphoma, or primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma.
The patients will be assessed in 2 parallel cohorts of approximately 90 patients each. One cohort will enroll patients who have received an autologous stem cell transplant, and the other will enroll patients who have received salvage chemotherapy but are ineligible for transplant.
Pidilizumab will be given at a dose of 200 mg by intravenous infusion. The primary endpoint of the trial is best overall response rate.
FDA approves ibrutinib as first-line CLL therapy
Photo courtesy of Janssen
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib (Imbruvica) as a first-line treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).
This means ibrutinib is now FDA-approved to treat CLL patients regardless of their treatment history, including patients with 17p deletion.
Ibrutinib is also FDA-approved to treat Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, and the drug was granted accelerated approval to treat patients with mantle cell lymphoma who have received at least 1 prior therapy.
Ibrutinib is jointly developed and commercialized by Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company, and Janssen Biotech, Inc. For more details on the drug, see the full prescribing information, available at imbruvica.com.
RESONATE-2 trial
The latest FDA approval for ibrutinib is based on results from the phase 3 RESONATE-2 trial (PCYC-1115), which were presented at the 2015 ASH Annual Meeting and simultaneously published in NEJM.
RESONATE-2 enrolled 269 treatment-naïve patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma who were 65 or older.
Patients were randomized to receive ibrutinib (n=136) at 420 mg once a day until progression or unacceptable toxicity, or chlorambucil (n=133) on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle for up to 12 cycles. The starting dose for chlorambucil in cycle 1 was 0.5 mg/kg and was increased based on tolerability in cycle 2 by increments of 0.1 mg/kg to a maximum of 0.8 mg/kg.
The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), as assessed by an independent review committee (IRC) according to the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iWCLL) 2008 criteria, with modification for treatment-related lymphocytosis.
Key secondary endpoints included overall response rate (based on the same iWCLL criteria), overall survival (OS), and safety.
Ibrutinib significantly prolonged PFS, as determined by the IRC, reducing the risk of progression or death by 84% compared to chlorambucil. The hazard ratio was 0.16 (P<0.001). The median PFS was not reached in the ibrutinib arm but was 18.9 months for the chlorambucil arm.
Ibrutinib significantly prolonged OS as well, although the median OS was not reached in either treatment arm. The OS rate at 24 months was 98% with ibrutinib and 85% with chlorambucil. The relative risk of death with ibrutinib was 84% lower than that with chlorambucil. The hazard ratio was 0.16 (P=0.001).
Ibrutinib was associated with a significantly higher IRC-assessed overall response rate compared to chlorambucil—82% and 35%, respectively (P<0.0001). Five patients (4%) in the ibrutinib arm achieved a complete response, as did 2 patients (2%) in the chlorambucil arm.
The median duration of treatment was 17.4 months in the ibrutinib arm and 7.1 months in the chlorambucil arm.
The most common adverse events of any grade—in the ibrutinib and chlorambucil arms, respectively—were diarrhea (42% and 17%), fatigue (30% and 38%), cough (22% and 15%), nausea (22% and 39%), peripheral edema (19% and 9%), dry eye (17% and 5%), arthralgia (16% and 7%), neutropenia (16% and 23%), and vomiting (13% and 20%).
Adverse events of grade 3 or higher—in the ibrutinib and chlorambucil arms, respectively—were neutropenia (10% and 18%), anemia (6% and 8%), hypertension (4% and 0%), pneumonia (4% and 2%), diarrhea (4% and 0%), maculopapular rash (3% and 2%), decreased platelet count (3% and 1%), abdominal pain (3% and 1%), hyponatremia (3% and 0%), thrombocytopenia (2% and 6%), febrile neutropenia (2% and 2%), upper respiratory tract infection (2% and 2%), pleural effusion (2% and 1%), cellulitis (2% and 0%), fatigue (1% and 5%), syncope (1% and 2%), and hemolytic anemia (0% and 2%).
Photo courtesy of Janssen
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib (Imbruvica) as a first-line treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).
This means ibrutinib is now FDA-approved to treat CLL patients regardless of their treatment history, including patients with 17p deletion.
Ibrutinib is also FDA-approved to treat Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, and the drug was granted accelerated approval to treat patients with mantle cell lymphoma who have received at least 1 prior therapy.
Ibrutinib is jointly developed and commercialized by Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company, and Janssen Biotech, Inc. For more details on the drug, see the full prescribing information, available at imbruvica.com.
RESONATE-2 trial
The latest FDA approval for ibrutinib is based on results from the phase 3 RESONATE-2 trial (PCYC-1115), which were presented at the 2015 ASH Annual Meeting and simultaneously published in NEJM.
RESONATE-2 enrolled 269 treatment-naïve patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma who were 65 or older.
Patients were randomized to receive ibrutinib (n=136) at 420 mg once a day until progression or unacceptable toxicity, or chlorambucil (n=133) on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle for up to 12 cycles. The starting dose for chlorambucil in cycle 1 was 0.5 mg/kg and was increased based on tolerability in cycle 2 by increments of 0.1 mg/kg to a maximum of 0.8 mg/kg.
The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), as assessed by an independent review committee (IRC) according to the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iWCLL) 2008 criteria, with modification for treatment-related lymphocytosis.
Key secondary endpoints included overall response rate (based on the same iWCLL criteria), overall survival (OS), and safety.
Ibrutinib significantly prolonged PFS, as determined by the IRC, reducing the risk of progression or death by 84% compared to chlorambucil. The hazard ratio was 0.16 (P<0.001). The median PFS was not reached in the ibrutinib arm but was 18.9 months for the chlorambucil arm.
Ibrutinib significantly prolonged OS as well, although the median OS was not reached in either treatment arm. The OS rate at 24 months was 98% with ibrutinib and 85% with chlorambucil. The relative risk of death with ibrutinib was 84% lower than that with chlorambucil. The hazard ratio was 0.16 (P=0.001).
Ibrutinib was associated with a significantly higher IRC-assessed overall response rate compared to chlorambucil—82% and 35%, respectively (P<0.0001). Five patients (4%) in the ibrutinib arm achieved a complete response, as did 2 patients (2%) in the chlorambucil arm.
The median duration of treatment was 17.4 months in the ibrutinib arm and 7.1 months in the chlorambucil arm.
The most common adverse events of any grade—in the ibrutinib and chlorambucil arms, respectively—were diarrhea (42% and 17%), fatigue (30% and 38%), cough (22% and 15%), nausea (22% and 39%), peripheral edema (19% and 9%), dry eye (17% and 5%), arthralgia (16% and 7%), neutropenia (16% and 23%), and vomiting (13% and 20%).
Adverse events of grade 3 or higher—in the ibrutinib and chlorambucil arms, respectively—were neutropenia (10% and 18%), anemia (6% and 8%), hypertension (4% and 0%), pneumonia (4% and 2%), diarrhea (4% and 0%), maculopapular rash (3% and 2%), decreased platelet count (3% and 1%), abdominal pain (3% and 1%), hyponatremia (3% and 0%), thrombocytopenia (2% and 6%), febrile neutropenia (2% and 2%), upper respiratory tract infection (2% and 2%), pleural effusion (2% and 1%), cellulitis (2% and 0%), fatigue (1% and 5%), syncope (1% and 2%), and hemolytic anemia (0% and 2%).
Photo courtesy of Janssen
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib (Imbruvica) as a first-line treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).
This means ibrutinib is now FDA-approved to treat CLL patients regardless of their treatment history, including patients with 17p deletion.
Ibrutinib is also FDA-approved to treat Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, and the drug was granted accelerated approval to treat patients with mantle cell lymphoma who have received at least 1 prior therapy.
Ibrutinib is jointly developed and commercialized by Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company, and Janssen Biotech, Inc. For more details on the drug, see the full prescribing information, available at imbruvica.com.
RESONATE-2 trial
The latest FDA approval for ibrutinib is based on results from the phase 3 RESONATE-2 trial (PCYC-1115), which were presented at the 2015 ASH Annual Meeting and simultaneously published in NEJM.
RESONATE-2 enrolled 269 treatment-naïve patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma who were 65 or older.
Patients were randomized to receive ibrutinib (n=136) at 420 mg once a day until progression or unacceptable toxicity, or chlorambucil (n=133) on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle for up to 12 cycles. The starting dose for chlorambucil in cycle 1 was 0.5 mg/kg and was increased based on tolerability in cycle 2 by increments of 0.1 mg/kg to a maximum of 0.8 mg/kg.
The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), as assessed by an independent review committee (IRC) according to the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iWCLL) 2008 criteria, with modification for treatment-related lymphocytosis.
Key secondary endpoints included overall response rate (based on the same iWCLL criteria), overall survival (OS), and safety.
Ibrutinib significantly prolonged PFS, as determined by the IRC, reducing the risk of progression or death by 84% compared to chlorambucil. The hazard ratio was 0.16 (P<0.001). The median PFS was not reached in the ibrutinib arm but was 18.9 months for the chlorambucil arm.
Ibrutinib significantly prolonged OS as well, although the median OS was not reached in either treatment arm. The OS rate at 24 months was 98% with ibrutinib and 85% with chlorambucil. The relative risk of death with ibrutinib was 84% lower than that with chlorambucil. The hazard ratio was 0.16 (P=0.001).
Ibrutinib was associated with a significantly higher IRC-assessed overall response rate compared to chlorambucil—82% and 35%, respectively (P<0.0001). Five patients (4%) in the ibrutinib arm achieved a complete response, as did 2 patients (2%) in the chlorambucil arm.
The median duration of treatment was 17.4 months in the ibrutinib arm and 7.1 months in the chlorambucil arm.
The most common adverse events of any grade—in the ibrutinib and chlorambucil arms, respectively—were diarrhea (42% and 17%), fatigue (30% and 38%), cough (22% and 15%), nausea (22% and 39%), peripheral edema (19% and 9%), dry eye (17% and 5%), arthralgia (16% and 7%), neutropenia (16% and 23%), and vomiting (13% and 20%).
Adverse events of grade 3 or higher—in the ibrutinib and chlorambucil arms, respectively—were neutropenia (10% and 18%), anemia (6% and 8%), hypertension (4% and 0%), pneumonia (4% and 2%), diarrhea (4% and 0%), maculopapular rash (3% and 2%), decreased platelet count (3% and 1%), abdominal pain (3% and 1%), hyponatremia (3% and 0%), thrombocytopenia (2% and 6%), febrile neutropenia (2% and 2%), upper respiratory tract infection (2% and 2%), pleural effusion (2% and 1%), cellulitis (2% and 0%), fatigue (1% and 5%), syncope (1% and 2%), and hemolytic anemia (0% and 2%).
FDA approves obinutuzumab for FL
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved obinutuzumab (Gazyva) for certain patients with previously treated follicular lymphoma (FL).
Obinutuzumab is a glycoengineered, humanized, monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to the extracellular domain of the CD20 antigen on B cells.
The drug was previously approved by the FDA for use in combination with chlorambucil to treat patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Now, obinutuzumab is approved for use in combination with bendamustine, followed by obinutuzumab alone, to treat patients with FL who did not respond to a rituximab-containing regimen or whose FL returned after such treatment.
The recommended dose and schedule for the regimen is:
- Obinutuzumab at 1000 mg by intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1; on day 1 of cycles 2-6 (28-day cycles); then every 2 months for 2 years.
- Bendamustine at 90 mg/m2 by intravenous infusion on days 1 and 2 of cycles 1-6.
Full prescribing information for obinutuzumab is available on the FDA website or at www.Gazyva.com.
Phase 3 study
The approval for obinutuzumab in FL is based on results from the phase 3 GADOLIN study. The trial included 413 patients with rituximab-refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including 321 patients with FL, 46 with marginal zone lymphoma, and 28 with small lymphocytic lymphoma.
The patients were randomized to receive bendamustine alone (control arm) or a combination of bendamustine and obinutuzumab followed by obinutuzumab maintenance (every 2 months for 2 years or until progression).
The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), as assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). The secondary endpoints were PFS as assessed by investigator review, best overall response, complete response (CR), partial response (PR), duration of response, overall survival, and safety profile.
Among patients with FL, the obinutuzumab regimen improved PFS compared to bendamustine alone, as assessed by IRC (hazard ratio [HR]=0.48, P<0.0001). The median PFS was not reached in patients receiving the obinutuzumab regimen but was 13.8 months in those receiving bendamustine alone.
Investigator-assessed PFS was consistent with IRC-assessed PFS. Investigators said the median PFS with the obinutuzumab regimen was more than double that with bendamustine alone—29.2 months vs 13.7 months (HR=0.48, P<0.0001).
Best overall response for patients receiving the obinutuzumab regimen was 78.7% (15.5% CR, 63.2% PR), compared to 74.7% for those receiving bendamustine alone (18.7% CR, 56% PR), as assessed by the IRC.
The median duration of response was not reached for patients receiving the obinutuzumab regimen and was 11.6 months for those receiving bendamustine alone.
The median overall survival has not yet been reached in either study arm.
The most common grade 3/4 adverse events observed in patients receiving the obinutuzumab regimen were neutropenia (33%), infusion reactions (11%), and thrombocytopenia (10%).
The most common adverse events of any grade were infusion reactions (69%), neutropenia (35%), nausea (54%), fatigue (39%), cough (26%), diarrhea (27%), constipation (19%), fever (18%), thrombocytopenia (15%), vomiting (22%), upper respiratory tract infection (13%), decreased appetite (18%), joint or muscle pain (12%), sinusitis (12%), anemia (12%), general weakness (11%), and urinary tract infection (10%).
About obinutuzumab
Obinutuzumab is being studied in a large clinical program, including the phase 3 GOYA and GALLIUM studies.
In GOYA, researchers are comparing obinutuzumab head-to-head with rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy in first-line diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. In GALLIUM, researchers are comparing obinutuzumab plus chemotherapy head-to-head with rituximab plus chemotherapy in first-line indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Additional combination studies investigating obinutuzumab with other approved or investigational medicines, including cancer immunotherapies and small-molecule inhibitors, are planned or underway across a range of blood cancers.
Obinutuzumab was discovered by Roche Glycart AG, a wholly owned, independent research unit of Roche. In the US, obinutuzumab is part of a collaboration between Genentech and Biogen.
Genentech has a patient assistance program, Genentech Access Solutions, that can help qualifying patients access obinutuzumab and other Genentech medications.
The program is designed to help people navigate the access and reimbursement process and provide assistance to eligible patients in the US who are uninsured or cannot afford the out-of-pocket costs for their medicine. For more information, visit www.Genentech-Access.com.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved obinutuzumab (Gazyva) for certain patients with previously treated follicular lymphoma (FL).
Obinutuzumab is a glycoengineered, humanized, monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to the extracellular domain of the CD20 antigen on B cells.
The drug was previously approved by the FDA for use in combination with chlorambucil to treat patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Now, obinutuzumab is approved for use in combination with bendamustine, followed by obinutuzumab alone, to treat patients with FL who did not respond to a rituximab-containing regimen or whose FL returned after such treatment.
The recommended dose and schedule for the regimen is:
- Obinutuzumab at 1000 mg by intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1; on day 1 of cycles 2-6 (28-day cycles); then every 2 months for 2 years.
- Bendamustine at 90 mg/m2 by intravenous infusion on days 1 and 2 of cycles 1-6.
Full prescribing information for obinutuzumab is available on the FDA website or at www.Gazyva.com.
Phase 3 study
The approval for obinutuzumab in FL is based on results from the phase 3 GADOLIN study. The trial included 413 patients with rituximab-refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including 321 patients with FL, 46 with marginal zone lymphoma, and 28 with small lymphocytic lymphoma.
The patients were randomized to receive bendamustine alone (control arm) or a combination of bendamustine and obinutuzumab followed by obinutuzumab maintenance (every 2 months for 2 years or until progression).
The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), as assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). The secondary endpoints were PFS as assessed by investigator review, best overall response, complete response (CR), partial response (PR), duration of response, overall survival, and safety profile.
Among patients with FL, the obinutuzumab regimen improved PFS compared to bendamustine alone, as assessed by IRC (hazard ratio [HR]=0.48, P<0.0001). The median PFS was not reached in patients receiving the obinutuzumab regimen but was 13.8 months in those receiving bendamustine alone.
Investigator-assessed PFS was consistent with IRC-assessed PFS. Investigators said the median PFS with the obinutuzumab regimen was more than double that with bendamustine alone—29.2 months vs 13.7 months (HR=0.48, P<0.0001).
Best overall response for patients receiving the obinutuzumab regimen was 78.7% (15.5% CR, 63.2% PR), compared to 74.7% for those receiving bendamustine alone (18.7% CR, 56% PR), as assessed by the IRC.
The median duration of response was not reached for patients receiving the obinutuzumab regimen and was 11.6 months for those receiving bendamustine alone.
The median overall survival has not yet been reached in either study arm.
The most common grade 3/4 adverse events observed in patients receiving the obinutuzumab regimen were neutropenia (33%), infusion reactions (11%), and thrombocytopenia (10%).
The most common adverse events of any grade were infusion reactions (69%), neutropenia (35%), nausea (54%), fatigue (39%), cough (26%), diarrhea (27%), constipation (19%), fever (18%), thrombocytopenia (15%), vomiting (22%), upper respiratory tract infection (13%), decreased appetite (18%), joint or muscle pain (12%), sinusitis (12%), anemia (12%), general weakness (11%), and urinary tract infection (10%).
About obinutuzumab
Obinutuzumab is being studied in a large clinical program, including the phase 3 GOYA and GALLIUM studies.
In GOYA, researchers are comparing obinutuzumab head-to-head with rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy in first-line diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. In GALLIUM, researchers are comparing obinutuzumab plus chemotherapy head-to-head with rituximab plus chemotherapy in first-line indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Additional combination studies investigating obinutuzumab with other approved or investigational medicines, including cancer immunotherapies and small-molecule inhibitors, are planned or underway across a range of blood cancers.
Obinutuzumab was discovered by Roche Glycart AG, a wholly owned, independent research unit of Roche. In the US, obinutuzumab is part of a collaboration between Genentech and Biogen.
Genentech has a patient assistance program, Genentech Access Solutions, that can help qualifying patients access obinutuzumab and other Genentech medications.
The program is designed to help people navigate the access and reimbursement process and provide assistance to eligible patients in the US who are uninsured or cannot afford the out-of-pocket costs for their medicine. For more information, visit www.Genentech-Access.com.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved obinutuzumab (Gazyva) for certain patients with previously treated follicular lymphoma (FL).
Obinutuzumab is a glycoengineered, humanized, monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to the extracellular domain of the CD20 antigen on B cells.
The drug was previously approved by the FDA for use in combination with chlorambucil to treat patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Now, obinutuzumab is approved for use in combination with bendamustine, followed by obinutuzumab alone, to treat patients with FL who did not respond to a rituximab-containing regimen or whose FL returned after such treatment.
The recommended dose and schedule for the regimen is:
- Obinutuzumab at 1000 mg by intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1; on day 1 of cycles 2-6 (28-day cycles); then every 2 months for 2 years.
- Bendamustine at 90 mg/m2 by intravenous infusion on days 1 and 2 of cycles 1-6.
Full prescribing information for obinutuzumab is available on the FDA website or at www.Gazyva.com.
Phase 3 study
The approval for obinutuzumab in FL is based on results from the phase 3 GADOLIN study. The trial included 413 patients with rituximab-refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including 321 patients with FL, 46 with marginal zone lymphoma, and 28 with small lymphocytic lymphoma.
The patients were randomized to receive bendamustine alone (control arm) or a combination of bendamustine and obinutuzumab followed by obinutuzumab maintenance (every 2 months for 2 years or until progression).
The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), as assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). The secondary endpoints were PFS as assessed by investigator review, best overall response, complete response (CR), partial response (PR), duration of response, overall survival, and safety profile.
Among patients with FL, the obinutuzumab regimen improved PFS compared to bendamustine alone, as assessed by IRC (hazard ratio [HR]=0.48, P<0.0001). The median PFS was not reached in patients receiving the obinutuzumab regimen but was 13.8 months in those receiving bendamustine alone.
Investigator-assessed PFS was consistent with IRC-assessed PFS. Investigators said the median PFS with the obinutuzumab regimen was more than double that with bendamustine alone—29.2 months vs 13.7 months (HR=0.48, P<0.0001).
Best overall response for patients receiving the obinutuzumab regimen was 78.7% (15.5% CR, 63.2% PR), compared to 74.7% for those receiving bendamustine alone (18.7% CR, 56% PR), as assessed by the IRC.
The median duration of response was not reached for patients receiving the obinutuzumab regimen and was 11.6 months for those receiving bendamustine alone.
The median overall survival has not yet been reached in either study arm.
The most common grade 3/4 adverse events observed in patients receiving the obinutuzumab regimen were neutropenia (33%), infusion reactions (11%), and thrombocytopenia (10%).
The most common adverse events of any grade were infusion reactions (69%), neutropenia (35%), nausea (54%), fatigue (39%), cough (26%), diarrhea (27%), constipation (19%), fever (18%), thrombocytopenia (15%), vomiting (22%), upper respiratory tract infection (13%), decreased appetite (18%), joint or muscle pain (12%), sinusitis (12%), anemia (12%), general weakness (11%), and urinary tract infection (10%).
About obinutuzumab
Obinutuzumab is being studied in a large clinical program, including the phase 3 GOYA and GALLIUM studies.
In GOYA, researchers are comparing obinutuzumab head-to-head with rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy in first-line diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. In GALLIUM, researchers are comparing obinutuzumab plus chemotherapy head-to-head with rituximab plus chemotherapy in first-line indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Additional combination studies investigating obinutuzumab with other approved or investigational medicines, including cancer immunotherapies and small-molecule inhibitors, are planned or underway across a range of blood cancers.
Obinutuzumab was discovered by Roche Glycart AG, a wholly owned, independent research unit of Roche. In the US, obinutuzumab is part of a collaboration between Genentech and Biogen.
Genentech has a patient assistance program, Genentech Access Solutions, that can help qualifying patients access obinutuzumab and other Genentech medications.
The program is designed to help people navigate the access and reimbursement process and provide assistance to eligible patients in the US who are uninsured or cannot afford the out-of-pocket costs for their medicine. For more information, visit www.Genentech-Access.com.
AAs have lower rate of most blood cancers than NHWs
receiving treatment
Photo by Rhoda Baer
A new report suggests African Americans (AAs) have significantly lower rates of most hematologic malignancies than non-Hispanic white (NHW) individuals in the US.
AAs of both sexes had significantly lower rates of leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) than NHWs, but the rate of myeloma was significantly higher among AAs.
The death rates for these malignancies followed the same patterns, with the exception of HL. There was no significant difference in HL mortality between AAs and NHWs of either sex.
These findings can be found in the report, “Cancer Statistics for African Americans, 2016,” appearing in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.
To compile this report, the researchers used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Program of Cancer Registries.
Incidence
For part of the report, the researchers compared the incidence of cancers between AAs and NHWs (divided by gender) for the period from 2008 to 2012.
Among females, the incidence of leukemia was 8.6 per 100,000 in AAs and 10.7 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05). Among males, the incidence was 13.2 per 100,000 in AAs and 17.7 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05).
The incidence of HL in females was 2.4 per 100,000 in AAs and 2.7 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05). The incidence of HL in males was 3.2 per 100,000 in AAs and 3.4 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05).
The incidence of NHL in females was 12.0 per 100,000 in AAs and 16.6 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05). The incidence of NHL in males was 17.2 per 100,000 in AAs and 24.1 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05).
The incidence of myeloma in females was 11.1 per 100,000 in AAs and 4.3 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05). The incidence of myeloma in males was 14.8 per 100,000 in AAs and 7.0 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05).
Mortality
The researchers also compared cancer mortality between AAs and NHWs (divided by gender) for the period from 2008 to 2012.
The death rate for female leukemia patients was 4.8 per 100,000 in AAs and 5.4 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05). The death rate for male leukemia patients was 8.1 per 100,000 in AAs and 9.9 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05).
The death rate for female HL patients was 0.3 per 100,000 for both AAs and NHWs. The death rate for male HL patients was 0.4 per 100,000 for AAs and 0.5 per 100,000 in NHWs (not significant).
The death rate for female NHL patients was 3.6 per 100,000 in AAs and 5.0 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05). The death rate for male NHL patients was 5.9 per 100,000 in AAs and 8.3 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05).
The death rate for female myeloma patients was 5.4 per 100,000 in AAs and 2.4 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05). The death rate for male myeloma patients was 7.8 per 100,000 in AAs and 4.0 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05).
The researchers noted that the reasons for the higher rates of myeloma and myeloma death among AAs are, at present, unknown.
receiving treatment
Photo by Rhoda Baer
A new report suggests African Americans (AAs) have significantly lower rates of most hematologic malignancies than non-Hispanic white (NHW) individuals in the US.
AAs of both sexes had significantly lower rates of leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) than NHWs, but the rate of myeloma was significantly higher among AAs.
The death rates for these malignancies followed the same patterns, with the exception of HL. There was no significant difference in HL mortality between AAs and NHWs of either sex.
These findings can be found in the report, “Cancer Statistics for African Americans, 2016,” appearing in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.
To compile this report, the researchers used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Program of Cancer Registries.
Incidence
For part of the report, the researchers compared the incidence of cancers between AAs and NHWs (divided by gender) for the period from 2008 to 2012.
Among females, the incidence of leukemia was 8.6 per 100,000 in AAs and 10.7 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05). Among males, the incidence was 13.2 per 100,000 in AAs and 17.7 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05).
The incidence of HL in females was 2.4 per 100,000 in AAs and 2.7 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05). The incidence of HL in males was 3.2 per 100,000 in AAs and 3.4 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05).
The incidence of NHL in females was 12.0 per 100,000 in AAs and 16.6 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05). The incidence of NHL in males was 17.2 per 100,000 in AAs and 24.1 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05).
The incidence of myeloma in females was 11.1 per 100,000 in AAs and 4.3 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05). The incidence of myeloma in males was 14.8 per 100,000 in AAs and 7.0 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05).
Mortality
The researchers also compared cancer mortality between AAs and NHWs (divided by gender) for the period from 2008 to 2012.
The death rate for female leukemia patients was 4.8 per 100,000 in AAs and 5.4 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05). The death rate for male leukemia patients was 8.1 per 100,000 in AAs and 9.9 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05).
The death rate for female HL patients was 0.3 per 100,000 for both AAs and NHWs. The death rate for male HL patients was 0.4 per 100,000 for AAs and 0.5 per 100,000 in NHWs (not significant).
The death rate for female NHL patients was 3.6 per 100,000 in AAs and 5.0 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05). The death rate for male NHL patients was 5.9 per 100,000 in AAs and 8.3 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05).
The death rate for female myeloma patients was 5.4 per 100,000 in AAs and 2.4 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05). The death rate for male myeloma patients was 7.8 per 100,000 in AAs and 4.0 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05).
The researchers noted that the reasons for the higher rates of myeloma and myeloma death among AAs are, at present, unknown.
receiving treatment
Photo by Rhoda Baer
A new report suggests African Americans (AAs) have significantly lower rates of most hematologic malignancies than non-Hispanic white (NHW) individuals in the US.
AAs of both sexes had significantly lower rates of leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) than NHWs, but the rate of myeloma was significantly higher among AAs.
The death rates for these malignancies followed the same patterns, with the exception of HL. There was no significant difference in HL mortality between AAs and NHWs of either sex.
These findings can be found in the report, “Cancer Statistics for African Americans, 2016,” appearing in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.
To compile this report, the researchers used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Program of Cancer Registries.
Incidence
For part of the report, the researchers compared the incidence of cancers between AAs and NHWs (divided by gender) for the period from 2008 to 2012.
Among females, the incidence of leukemia was 8.6 per 100,000 in AAs and 10.7 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05). Among males, the incidence was 13.2 per 100,000 in AAs and 17.7 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05).
The incidence of HL in females was 2.4 per 100,000 in AAs and 2.7 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05). The incidence of HL in males was 3.2 per 100,000 in AAs and 3.4 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05).
The incidence of NHL in females was 12.0 per 100,000 in AAs and 16.6 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05). The incidence of NHL in males was 17.2 per 100,000 in AAs and 24.1 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05).
The incidence of myeloma in females was 11.1 per 100,000 in AAs and 4.3 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05). The incidence of myeloma in males was 14.8 per 100,000 in AAs and 7.0 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05).
Mortality
The researchers also compared cancer mortality between AAs and NHWs (divided by gender) for the period from 2008 to 2012.
The death rate for female leukemia patients was 4.8 per 100,000 in AAs and 5.4 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05). The death rate for male leukemia patients was 8.1 per 100,000 in AAs and 9.9 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05).
The death rate for female HL patients was 0.3 per 100,000 for both AAs and NHWs. The death rate for male HL patients was 0.4 per 100,000 for AAs and 0.5 per 100,000 in NHWs (not significant).
The death rate for female NHL patients was 3.6 per 100,000 in AAs and 5.0 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05). The death rate for male NHL patients was 5.9 per 100,000 in AAs and 8.3 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05).
The death rate for female myeloma patients was 5.4 per 100,000 in AAs and 2.4 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05). The death rate for male myeloma patients was 7.8 per 100,000 in AAs and 4.0 per 100,000 in NHWs (P<0.05).
The researchers noted that the reasons for the higher rates of myeloma and myeloma death among AAs are, at present, unknown.
Orphan designation recommended for BTK inhibitor
The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP) is recommending orphan designation for the second-generation BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib (ACP-196) for 3 indications.
The COMP is recommending the drug receive orphan designation as a treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), mantle cell lymphoma, and Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia.
The COMP adopts an opinion on orphan drug designation, and that opinion is submitted to the European Commission (EC) for endorsement.
To be granted orphan designation by the EC, a medicine must be intended for the treatment, prevention, or diagnosis of a disease that is life-threatening and has a prevalence of up to 5 in 10,000 in the European Union. Additionally, the medicine must aim to provide significant benefit to those affected by the condition.
Orphan designation provides companies with development and market exclusivity incentives for designated compounds and medicines.
About acalabrutinib
Acalabrutinib is under development by AstraZeneca and Acerta Pharma BV. The drug is currently being evaluated in trials of patients with CLL/SLL, mantle cell lymphoma, Waldentröm’s macroglobulinemia, and a range of other hematologic malignancies and solid tumor cancers.
Data from a phase 1/2 trial of acalabrutinib in CLL were presented at the 2015 ASH Annual Meeting and simultaneously published in NEJM.
The researchers reported on 61 patients with relapsed CLL who had a median age of 62 (range, 44-84) and a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1-13).
Patients enrolled in the phase 1 portion of the study received escalating doses of acalabrutinib, with a maximum dose of 400 mg once daily. Patients involved in the phase 2 portion of the study were treated with a 100 mg dose twice daily.
At a median follow-up of 14.3 months (range, 0.5 to 20), 53 patients were still receiving treatment.
The most common adverse events of all grades (occurring in at least 20% of patients) were headache (43%), diarrhea (39%), increased weight (26%), pyrexia (23%), upper respiratory tract infection (23%), fatigue (21%), peripheral edema (21%), hypertension (20%), and nausea (20%).
Grade 3/4 adverse events included diarrhea (2%), increased weight (2%), pyrexia (3%), fatigue (3%), hypertension (7%), and arthralgia (2%).
The overall response rate among the 60 evaluable patients was 95%. This included partial responses in 85% of patients and partial responses with lymphocytosis in 10%. The rate of stable disease was 5%.
The researchers noted that responses occurred in all dosing cohorts, and the response rate increased over time.
The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP) is recommending orphan designation for the second-generation BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib (ACP-196) for 3 indications.
The COMP is recommending the drug receive orphan designation as a treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), mantle cell lymphoma, and Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia.
The COMP adopts an opinion on orphan drug designation, and that opinion is submitted to the European Commission (EC) for endorsement.
To be granted orphan designation by the EC, a medicine must be intended for the treatment, prevention, or diagnosis of a disease that is life-threatening and has a prevalence of up to 5 in 10,000 in the European Union. Additionally, the medicine must aim to provide significant benefit to those affected by the condition.
Orphan designation provides companies with development and market exclusivity incentives for designated compounds and medicines.
About acalabrutinib
Acalabrutinib is under development by AstraZeneca and Acerta Pharma BV. The drug is currently being evaluated in trials of patients with CLL/SLL, mantle cell lymphoma, Waldentröm’s macroglobulinemia, and a range of other hematologic malignancies and solid tumor cancers.
Data from a phase 1/2 trial of acalabrutinib in CLL were presented at the 2015 ASH Annual Meeting and simultaneously published in NEJM.
The researchers reported on 61 patients with relapsed CLL who had a median age of 62 (range, 44-84) and a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1-13).
Patients enrolled in the phase 1 portion of the study received escalating doses of acalabrutinib, with a maximum dose of 400 mg once daily. Patients involved in the phase 2 portion of the study were treated with a 100 mg dose twice daily.
At a median follow-up of 14.3 months (range, 0.5 to 20), 53 patients were still receiving treatment.
The most common adverse events of all grades (occurring in at least 20% of patients) were headache (43%), diarrhea (39%), increased weight (26%), pyrexia (23%), upper respiratory tract infection (23%), fatigue (21%), peripheral edema (21%), hypertension (20%), and nausea (20%).
Grade 3/4 adverse events included diarrhea (2%), increased weight (2%), pyrexia (3%), fatigue (3%), hypertension (7%), and arthralgia (2%).
The overall response rate among the 60 evaluable patients was 95%. This included partial responses in 85% of patients and partial responses with lymphocytosis in 10%. The rate of stable disease was 5%.
The researchers noted that responses occurred in all dosing cohorts, and the response rate increased over time.
The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP) is recommending orphan designation for the second-generation BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib (ACP-196) for 3 indications.
The COMP is recommending the drug receive orphan designation as a treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), mantle cell lymphoma, and Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia.
The COMP adopts an opinion on orphan drug designation, and that opinion is submitted to the European Commission (EC) for endorsement.
To be granted orphan designation by the EC, a medicine must be intended for the treatment, prevention, or diagnosis of a disease that is life-threatening and has a prevalence of up to 5 in 10,000 in the European Union. Additionally, the medicine must aim to provide significant benefit to those affected by the condition.
Orphan designation provides companies with development and market exclusivity incentives for designated compounds and medicines.
About acalabrutinib
Acalabrutinib is under development by AstraZeneca and Acerta Pharma BV. The drug is currently being evaluated in trials of patients with CLL/SLL, mantle cell lymphoma, Waldentröm’s macroglobulinemia, and a range of other hematologic malignancies and solid tumor cancers.
Data from a phase 1/2 trial of acalabrutinib in CLL were presented at the 2015 ASH Annual Meeting and simultaneously published in NEJM.
The researchers reported on 61 patients with relapsed CLL who had a median age of 62 (range, 44-84) and a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1-13).
Patients enrolled in the phase 1 portion of the study received escalating doses of acalabrutinib, with a maximum dose of 400 mg once daily. Patients involved in the phase 2 portion of the study were treated with a 100 mg dose twice daily.
At a median follow-up of 14.3 months (range, 0.5 to 20), 53 patients were still receiving treatment.
The most common adverse events of all grades (occurring in at least 20% of patients) were headache (43%), diarrhea (39%), increased weight (26%), pyrexia (23%), upper respiratory tract infection (23%), fatigue (21%), peripheral edema (21%), hypertension (20%), and nausea (20%).
Grade 3/4 adverse events included diarrhea (2%), increased weight (2%), pyrexia (3%), fatigue (3%), hypertension (7%), and arthralgia (2%).
The overall response rate among the 60 evaluable patients was 95%. This included partial responses in 85% of patients and partial responses with lymphocytosis in 10%. The rate of stable disease was 5%.
The researchers noted that responses occurred in all dosing cohorts, and the response rate increased over time.
How an anticancer drug fights lymphoid malignancies
Photo by Cameron Wells,
Walter and Eliza Hall
Institute of Medical Research
Research published in Cell Reports helps explain how the anticancer agent Nutlin3a fights lymphoma and other hematologic malignancies.
Nutlin3a is known to activate the tumor suppressor p53, but it hasn’t been clear exactly which p53 target genes are essential for the drug’s therapeutic activity.
The new research revealed that PUMA-mediated apoptosis—not p21-mediated cell-cycle arrest or senescence—is responsible for Nutlin3a’s therapeutic activity in lymphoid malignancies.
“By understanding how nutlins are killing cancer cells, we can begin to formulate their best possible use, including choosing the best partner drugs to combine the nutlins with,” said study author Andreas Strasser, PhD, of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research in Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
With this study, Dr Strasser and his colleagues first found that Nutlin3a activates p53 target gene expression and causes cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in non-transformed mouse lymphoid cells in vitro.
The team then showed that Nutlin3a-mediated killing of these cells requires PUMA but not p21. In vivo, loss of PUMA protected non-transformed mouse lymphoid cells against Nutlin3a-induced killing. Loss of p21 did not provide the same protection.
Next, the researchers found that malignant Eµ-Myc lymphoma cells were much more sensitive to Nutlin3a than were non-transformed lymphoid cells. In vitro experiments with Eµ-Myc lymphoma cells showed that Nutlin3a promotes p53 accumulation and downstream effector pathway activation.
As in previous experiments, PUMA (not p21) proved critical for Nutlin3a-induced killing of Eµ-Myc lymphoma cells in vitro. And loss of PUMA (but not p21) impaired the regression of Eµ-Myc lymphomas induced by Nutlin3a in vivo.
Finally, the researchers found that PUMA contributed to Nutlin3a-induced apoptosis in myeloid leukemia, multiple myeloma, and Burkitt lymphoma cell lines.
The team noted that, because PUMA, a pro-apoptotic BH3-only protein, is critical for the therapeutic impact of Nutlin3a, it may be possible to boost the drug’s efficacy by combining it with BH3 mimetic drugs such as navitoclax or venetoclax.
Photo by Cameron Wells,
Walter and Eliza Hall
Institute of Medical Research
Research published in Cell Reports helps explain how the anticancer agent Nutlin3a fights lymphoma and other hematologic malignancies.
Nutlin3a is known to activate the tumor suppressor p53, but it hasn’t been clear exactly which p53 target genes are essential for the drug’s therapeutic activity.
The new research revealed that PUMA-mediated apoptosis—not p21-mediated cell-cycle arrest or senescence—is responsible for Nutlin3a’s therapeutic activity in lymphoid malignancies.
“By understanding how nutlins are killing cancer cells, we can begin to formulate their best possible use, including choosing the best partner drugs to combine the nutlins with,” said study author Andreas Strasser, PhD, of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research in Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
With this study, Dr Strasser and his colleagues first found that Nutlin3a activates p53 target gene expression and causes cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in non-transformed mouse lymphoid cells in vitro.
The team then showed that Nutlin3a-mediated killing of these cells requires PUMA but not p21. In vivo, loss of PUMA protected non-transformed mouse lymphoid cells against Nutlin3a-induced killing. Loss of p21 did not provide the same protection.
Next, the researchers found that malignant Eµ-Myc lymphoma cells were much more sensitive to Nutlin3a than were non-transformed lymphoid cells. In vitro experiments with Eµ-Myc lymphoma cells showed that Nutlin3a promotes p53 accumulation and downstream effector pathway activation.
As in previous experiments, PUMA (not p21) proved critical for Nutlin3a-induced killing of Eµ-Myc lymphoma cells in vitro. And loss of PUMA (but not p21) impaired the regression of Eµ-Myc lymphomas induced by Nutlin3a in vivo.
Finally, the researchers found that PUMA contributed to Nutlin3a-induced apoptosis in myeloid leukemia, multiple myeloma, and Burkitt lymphoma cell lines.
The team noted that, because PUMA, a pro-apoptotic BH3-only protein, is critical for the therapeutic impact of Nutlin3a, it may be possible to boost the drug’s efficacy by combining it with BH3 mimetic drugs such as navitoclax or venetoclax.
Photo by Cameron Wells,
Walter and Eliza Hall
Institute of Medical Research
Research published in Cell Reports helps explain how the anticancer agent Nutlin3a fights lymphoma and other hematologic malignancies.
Nutlin3a is known to activate the tumor suppressor p53, but it hasn’t been clear exactly which p53 target genes are essential for the drug’s therapeutic activity.
The new research revealed that PUMA-mediated apoptosis—not p21-mediated cell-cycle arrest or senescence—is responsible for Nutlin3a’s therapeutic activity in lymphoid malignancies.
“By understanding how nutlins are killing cancer cells, we can begin to formulate their best possible use, including choosing the best partner drugs to combine the nutlins with,” said study author Andreas Strasser, PhD, of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research in Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
With this study, Dr Strasser and his colleagues first found that Nutlin3a activates p53 target gene expression and causes cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in non-transformed mouse lymphoid cells in vitro.
The team then showed that Nutlin3a-mediated killing of these cells requires PUMA but not p21. In vivo, loss of PUMA protected non-transformed mouse lymphoid cells against Nutlin3a-induced killing. Loss of p21 did not provide the same protection.
Next, the researchers found that malignant Eµ-Myc lymphoma cells were much more sensitive to Nutlin3a than were non-transformed lymphoid cells. In vitro experiments with Eµ-Myc lymphoma cells showed that Nutlin3a promotes p53 accumulation and downstream effector pathway activation.
As in previous experiments, PUMA (not p21) proved critical for Nutlin3a-induced killing of Eµ-Myc lymphoma cells in vitro. And loss of PUMA (but not p21) impaired the regression of Eµ-Myc lymphomas induced by Nutlin3a in vivo.
Finally, the researchers found that PUMA contributed to Nutlin3a-induced apoptosis in myeloid leukemia, multiple myeloma, and Burkitt lymphoma cell lines.
The team noted that, because PUMA, a pro-apoptotic BH3-only protein, is critical for the therapeutic impact of Nutlin3a, it may be possible to boost the drug’s efficacy by combining it with BH3 mimetic drugs such as navitoclax or venetoclax.
Teens’ weight, height linked to risk of NHL
A new analysis indicates that having a higher body weight and taller stature during adolescence may increase the risk of developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).
Global rates of NHL have been on the rise in recent years, and research suggests that rising rates of obesity may be contributing to this trend.
With this in mind, investigators examined whether adolescent weight and height might be associated with the risk of developing NHL later in life.
They reported their results in Cancer.
The study included 2,352,988 subjects, ages 16 to 19, who were examined between 1967 and 2011. Their information was linked to the Israel National Cancer Registry, which included 4021 cases of NHL from 1967 through 2012.
The data showed that being overweight or obese in adolescence was associated with an increased risk of NHL later in life. When compared to adolescents of normal weight, the hazard ratio (HR) was 1.25 for subjects who were overweight or obese. The HR for underweight individuals was 0.98.
Being overweight or obese in adolescence was a significant predictor for marginal zone lymphoma (HR=1.70), primary cutaneous lymphoma (PCL, HR=1.44), and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, HR=1.31). Excess weight was a borderline predictor for follicular lymphoma (HR=1.28).
“It is important to be aware that overweight and obesity are not risk factors only for diabetes and cardiovascular disease but also for lymphomas,” said study author Merav Leiba, MD, of the Sheba Medical Center in Israel.
Dr Leiba and her colleagues also observed an increased risk of NHL corresponding with increases in subjects’ height. When compared with the mid-range height category, shorter individuals had an HR of 1.25, and the tallest individuals had an HR of 1.28.
The strongest associations between taller height and NHL were observed for primary cutaneous lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The HRs for the tallest group, compared to the shortest group, were 3.19 for PCL and 2.21 for DLBCL.
The investigators said additional research is needed to help explain the links between height, weight, and NHL.
A new analysis indicates that having a higher body weight and taller stature during adolescence may increase the risk of developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).
Global rates of NHL have been on the rise in recent years, and research suggests that rising rates of obesity may be contributing to this trend.
With this in mind, investigators examined whether adolescent weight and height might be associated with the risk of developing NHL later in life.
They reported their results in Cancer.
The study included 2,352,988 subjects, ages 16 to 19, who were examined between 1967 and 2011. Their information was linked to the Israel National Cancer Registry, which included 4021 cases of NHL from 1967 through 2012.
The data showed that being overweight or obese in adolescence was associated with an increased risk of NHL later in life. When compared to adolescents of normal weight, the hazard ratio (HR) was 1.25 for subjects who were overweight or obese. The HR for underweight individuals was 0.98.
Being overweight or obese in adolescence was a significant predictor for marginal zone lymphoma (HR=1.70), primary cutaneous lymphoma (PCL, HR=1.44), and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, HR=1.31). Excess weight was a borderline predictor for follicular lymphoma (HR=1.28).
“It is important to be aware that overweight and obesity are not risk factors only for diabetes and cardiovascular disease but also for lymphomas,” said study author Merav Leiba, MD, of the Sheba Medical Center in Israel.
Dr Leiba and her colleagues also observed an increased risk of NHL corresponding with increases in subjects’ height. When compared with the mid-range height category, shorter individuals had an HR of 1.25, and the tallest individuals had an HR of 1.28.
The strongest associations between taller height and NHL were observed for primary cutaneous lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The HRs for the tallest group, compared to the shortest group, were 3.19 for PCL and 2.21 for DLBCL.
The investigators said additional research is needed to help explain the links between height, weight, and NHL.
A new analysis indicates that having a higher body weight and taller stature during adolescence may increase the risk of developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).
Global rates of NHL have been on the rise in recent years, and research suggests that rising rates of obesity may be contributing to this trend.
With this in mind, investigators examined whether adolescent weight and height might be associated with the risk of developing NHL later in life.
They reported their results in Cancer.
The study included 2,352,988 subjects, ages 16 to 19, who were examined between 1967 and 2011. Their information was linked to the Israel National Cancer Registry, which included 4021 cases of NHL from 1967 through 2012.
The data showed that being overweight or obese in adolescence was associated with an increased risk of NHL later in life. When compared to adolescents of normal weight, the hazard ratio (HR) was 1.25 for subjects who were overweight or obese. The HR for underweight individuals was 0.98.
Being overweight or obese in adolescence was a significant predictor for marginal zone lymphoma (HR=1.70), primary cutaneous lymphoma (PCL, HR=1.44), and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, HR=1.31). Excess weight was a borderline predictor for follicular lymphoma (HR=1.28).
“It is important to be aware that overweight and obesity are not risk factors only for diabetes and cardiovascular disease but also for lymphomas,” said study author Merav Leiba, MD, of the Sheba Medical Center in Israel.
Dr Leiba and her colleagues also observed an increased risk of NHL corresponding with increases in subjects’ height. When compared with the mid-range height category, shorter individuals had an HR of 1.25, and the tallest individuals had an HR of 1.28.
The strongest associations between taller height and NHL were observed for primary cutaneous lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The HRs for the tallest group, compared to the shortest group, were 3.19 for PCL and 2.21 for DLBCL.
The investigators said additional research is needed to help explain the links between height, weight, and NHL.
Drug shows promise for treating resistant AML, MCL
Preclinical research suggests the investigational anticancer drug ONC201 can be effective against mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
ONC201 induced p53-independent apoptosis in AML and MCL cell lines and in samples from patients with either disease.
Investigators noted that p53 dysfunction occurs in more than half of malignancies and can promote resistance to standard chemotherapy.
“The clinical challenge posed by p53 abnormalities in blood malignancies is that therapeutic strategies other than standard chemotherapies are required,” said Michael Andreeff, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.
“We found that ONC201 caused p53-independent cell death and cell cycle arrest in cell lines and in lymphoma and acute leukemia patient samples.”
Dr Andreeff and his colleagues reported these findings in Science Signaling. Some of the investigators involved in this research are affiliated with Oncoceutics Inc., the company developing ONC201.
Dr Andreeff and his colleagues assessed the effects of ONC201 against AML and MCL, in both cultured cell lines and primary cells bearing either wild-type or mutant p53.
The patient samples included those that demonstrated genetic abnormalities linked to poor prognosis (FLT3 mutations, TP53 mutations) or resistance to ibrutinib. The team also tested ONC201 in a bortezomib-resistant myeloma cell line.
The experiments showed that ONC201 exerted anticancer activity regardless of p53 status, FLT3 mutations, or drug resistance. ONC201 proved active in the bortezomib-resistant myeloma cell line and in ibrutinib-resistant samples from MCL patients.
Experiments in mice showed that ONC201 caused cell death in AML and leukemia stem cells while sparing normal bone marrow cells.
And the investigators found that combining ONC201 with the BCL-2 antagonist venetoclax (ABT-199) synergistically increased apoptosis.
Further investigation revealed that ONC201 increased translation of the stress-induced protein ATF4 through stress signals similar to those caused by unfolded protein response (UPR) and integrated stress response (ISR).
“This increase in ATF4 in ONC201-treated hematopoietic cells promoted cell death,” Dr Andreeff explained. “However, unlike with UPR and ISR, the increase in ATF4 in ONC201-treated cells was not regulated by standard molecular signaling, indicating a novel mechanism of stressing cancer cells to death regardless of p53 status.”
The investigators noted that the mechanisms of ONC201 identified in solid tumors—namely, induction of TRAIL and DR5—were not operational in leukemia and lymphoma.
A study of ONC201 in solid tumors and multiple myeloma was published alongside this study in Science Signaling.
“There is clear evidence that ONC201 has clinical potential in hematological malignancies,” Dr Andreeff noted. “Clinical trials in leukemia and lymphoma patients have recently been initiated at MD Anderson.”
Preclinical research suggests the investigational anticancer drug ONC201 can be effective against mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
ONC201 induced p53-independent apoptosis in AML and MCL cell lines and in samples from patients with either disease.
Investigators noted that p53 dysfunction occurs in more than half of malignancies and can promote resistance to standard chemotherapy.
“The clinical challenge posed by p53 abnormalities in blood malignancies is that therapeutic strategies other than standard chemotherapies are required,” said Michael Andreeff, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.
“We found that ONC201 caused p53-independent cell death and cell cycle arrest in cell lines and in lymphoma and acute leukemia patient samples.”
Dr Andreeff and his colleagues reported these findings in Science Signaling. Some of the investigators involved in this research are affiliated with Oncoceutics Inc., the company developing ONC201.
Dr Andreeff and his colleagues assessed the effects of ONC201 against AML and MCL, in both cultured cell lines and primary cells bearing either wild-type or mutant p53.
The patient samples included those that demonstrated genetic abnormalities linked to poor prognosis (FLT3 mutations, TP53 mutations) or resistance to ibrutinib. The team also tested ONC201 in a bortezomib-resistant myeloma cell line.
The experiments showed that ONC201 exerted anticancer activity regardless of p53 status, FLT3 mutations, or drug resistance. ONC201 proved active in the bortezomib-resistant myeloma cell line and in ibrutinib-resistant samples from MCL patients.
Experiments in mice showed that ONC201 caused cell death in AML and leukemia stem cells while sparing normal bone marrow cells.
And the investigators found that combining ONC201 with the BCL-2 antagonist venetoclax (ABT-199) synergistically increased apoptosis.
Further investigation revealed that ONC201 increased translation of the stress-induced protein ATF4 through stress signals similar to those caused by unfolded protein response (UPR) and integrated stress response (ISR).
“This increase in ATF4 in ONC201-treated hematopoietic cells promoted cell death,” Dr Andreeff explained. “However, unlike with UPR and ISR, the increase in ATF4 in ONC201-treated cells was not regulated by standard molecular signaling, indicating a novel mechanism of stressing cancer cells to death regardless of p53 status.”
The investigators noted that the mechanisms of ONC201 identified in solid tumors—namely, induction of TRAIL and DR5—were not operational in leukemia and lymphoma.
A study of ONC201 in solid tumors and multiple myeloma was published alongside this study in Science Signaling.
“There is clear evidence that ONC201 has clinical potential in hematological malignancies,” Dr Andreeff noted. “Clinical trials in leukemia and lymphoma patients have recently been initiated at MD Anderson.”
Preclinical research suggests the investigational anticancer drug ONC201 can be effective against mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
ONC201 induced p53-independent apoptosis in AML and MCL cell lines and in samples from patients with either disease.
Investigators noted that p53 dysfunction occurs in more than half of malignancies and can promote resistance to standard chemotherapy.
“The clinical challenge posed by p53 abnormalities in blood malignancies is that therapeutic strategies other than standard chemotherapies are required,” said Michael Andreeff, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.
“We found that ONC201 caused p53-independent cell death and cell cycle arrest in cell lines and in lymphoma and acute leukemia patient samples.”
Dr Andreeff and his colleagues reported these findings in Science Signaling. Some of the investigators involved in this research are affiliated with Oncoceutics Inc., the company developing ONC201.
Dr Andreeff and his colleagues assessed the effects of ONC201 against AML and MCL, in both cultured cell lines and primary cells bearing either wild-type or mutant p53.
The patient samples included those that demonstrated genetic abnormalities linked to poor prognosis (FLT3 mutations, TP53 mutations) or resistance to ibrutinib. The team also tested ONC201 in a bortezomib-resistant myeloma cell line.
The experiments showed that ONC201 exerted anticancer activity regardless of p53 status, FLT3 mutations, or drug resistance. ONC201 proved active in the bortezomib-resistant myeloma cell line and in ibrutinib-resistant samples from MCL patients.
Experiments in mice showed that ONC201 caused cell death in AML and leukemia stem cells while sparing normal bone marrow cells.
And the investigators found that combining ONC201 with the BCL-2 antagonist venetoclax (ABT-199) synergistically increased apoptosis.
Further investigation revealed that ONC201 increased translation of the stress-induced protein ATF4 through stress signals similar to those caused by unfolded protein response (UPR) and integrated stress response (ISR).
“This increase in ATF4 in ONC201-treated hematopoietic cells promoted cell death,” Dr Andreeff explained. “However, unlike with UPR and ISR, the increase in ATF4 in ONC201-treated cells was not regulated by standard molecular signaling, indicating a novel mechanism of stressing cancer cells to death regardless of p53 status.”
The investigators noted that the mechanisms of ONC201 identified in solid tumors—namely, induction of TRAIL and DR5—were not operational in leukemia and lymphoma.
A study of ONC201 in solid tumors and multiple myeloma was published alongside this study in Science Signaling.
“There is clear evidence that ONC201 has clinical potential in hematological malignancies,” Dr Andreeff noted. “Clinical trials in leukemia and lymphoma patients have recently been initiated at MD Anderson.”
Combo can produce durable remissions in PTCL
Photo by Larry Young
SAN FRANCISCO—A combination treatment regimen can produce durable remissions in patients newly diagnosed with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), results of a phase 1 study suggest.
The patients received brentuximab vedotin plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisolone (BV+CHP). In some cases, this was followed by BV monotherapy.
The estimated 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) for these patients was 52%, and the overall survival (OS) was 80%.
There was a high rate of peripheral neuropathy (73%), but most cases resolved or improved over time.
Steven Horwitz, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, New York, and his colleagues presented these data as a poster at the 8th Annual T-cell Lymphoma Forum. The study was supported by Seattle Genetics and Millennium Pharmaceuticals.
The researchers presented data on 26 patients newly diagnosed with PTCL. Nineteen patients had systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL; 16 ALK- and 3 ALK+), 2 had PTCL not otherwise specified, 2 had angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, 2 had adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, and 1 had enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma.
The patients’ median age was 56 (range, 21-82). Sixty-nine percent of patients had an IPI score of 2 or higher, and 73% had stage III/IV disease.
Treatment
The patients received BV+CHP every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. Those who achieved at least a partial remission could go on to receive up to 10 additional cycles of single-agent BV at 1.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks.
Twenty-three patients (88%) completed all 6 cycles of BV+CHP, and 21 patients (81%) went on to receive BV monotherapy, 11 of whom (42%) received all 10 cycles.
Fifteen patients (58%) discontinued treatment, 3 due to progressive disease, 3 due to investigator decision, 6 due to adverse events, and 3 due to patient decision.
After a median observation period of 38.7 months (range, 4.6 to 44.3), 77% of patients (n=20) remained on study.
Toxicity
The most common adverse events (occurring in at least 30% of patients) were nausea (69%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (69%), diarrhea (62%), fatigue (58%), alopecia (54%), dyspnea (46%), constipation (35%), myalgia (31%), peripheral edema (31%), chills (31%), anemia (31%), insomnia (31%), and febrile neutropenia.
The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events (occurring in at least 10% of patients) were febrile neutropenia (31%), neutropenia (23%), anemia (15%), and pulmonary embolism (12%).
There were 6 adverse events resulting in treatment discontinuation—peripheral sensory neuropathy (n=3), abdominal pain (n=1), asthenia (n=1), and peripheral motor neuropathy (n=1).
Seventy-three percent of patients (19/26) experienced peripheral neuropathy. Thirty-seven percent (n=7) had a complete resolution of neuropathy, and 58% (n=11) had some improvement. The median time to resolution was 1.3 months. Twelve patients (63%) had ongoing neuropathy at last follow-up, but most had grade 1 (n=10).
Response and survival
The objective response rate was 100%, and the complete response rate was 88% (n=23). One patient who had a partial response at the end of combination therapy achieved a complete response after going on to single-agent BV.
Twenty-one of the 26 patients are still alive—15 with ALCL and 6 with other PTCLs. Sixteen patients have not progressed—9 with ALCL and 5 with other PTCLs.
After progression, 5 patients received BV again, and 3 received stem cell transplants (2 allogeneic and 1 autologous).
The estimated 3-year PFS was 52%, and the estimated OS was 80%. The researchers noted that these rates compare favorably with the historical 3-year PFS and OS rates of 30% and 40%, respectively.
Researchers are currently conducting a phase 3 trial comparing BV+CHP with CHOP as frontline treatment of CD30+ mature T-cell lymphomas (ECHELON-2, NCT01777152).
Photo by Larry Young
SAN FRANCISCO—A combination treatment regimen can produce durable remissions in patients newly diagnosed with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), results of a phase 1 study suggest.
The patients received brentuximab vedotin plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisolone (BV+CHP). In some cases, this was followed by BV monotherapy.
The estimated 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) for these patients was 52%, and the overall survival (OS) was 80%.
There was a high rate of peripheral neuropathy (73%), but most cases resolved or improved over time.
Steven Horwitz, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, New York, and his colleagues presented these data as a poster at the 8th Annual T-cell Lymphoma Forum. The study was supported by Seattle Genetics and Millennium Pharmaceuticals.
The researchers presented data on 26 patients newly diagnosed with PTCL. Nineteen patients had systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL; 16 ALK- and 3 ALK+), 2 had PTCL not otherwise specified, 2 had angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, 2 had adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, and 1 had enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma.
The patients’ median age was 56 (range, 21-82). Sixty-nine percent of patients had an IPI score of 2 or higher, and 73% had stage III/IV disease.
Treatment
The patients received BV+CHP every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. Those who achieved at least a partial remission could go on to receive up to 10 additional cycles of single-agent BV at 1.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks.
Twenty-three patients (88%) completed all 6 cycles of BV+CHP, and 21 patients (81%) went on to receive BV monotherapy, 11 of whom (42%) received all 10 cycles.
Fifteen patients (58%) discontinued treatment, 3 due to progressive disease, 3 due to investigator decision, 6 due to adverse events, and 3 due to patient decision.
After a median observation period of 38.7 months (range, 4.6 to 44.3), 77% of patients (n=20) remained on study.
Toxicity
The most common adverse events (occurring in at least 30% of patients) were nausea (69%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (69%), diarrhea (62%), fatigue (58%), alopecia (54%), dyspnea (46%), constipation (35%), myalgia (31%), peripheral edema (31%), chills (31%), anemia (31%), insomnia (31%), and febrile neutropenia.
The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events (occurring in at least 10% of patients) were febrile neutropenia (31%), neutropenia (23%), anemia (15%), and pulmonary embolism (12%).
There were 6 adverse events resulting in treatment discontinuation—peripheral sensory neuropathy (n=3), abdominal pain (n=1), asthenia (n=1), and peripheral motor neuropathy (n=1).
Seventy-three percent of patients (19/26) experienced peripheral neuropathy. Thirty-seven percent (n=7) had a complete resolution of neuropathy, and 58% (n=11) had some improvement. The median time to resolution was 1.3 months. Twelve patients (63%) had ongoing neuropathy at last follow-up, but most had grade 1 (n=10).
Response and survival
The objective response rate was 100%, and the complete response rate was 88% (n=23). One patient who had a partial response at the end of combination therapy achieved a complete response after going on to single-agent BV.
Twenty-one of the 26 patients are still alive—15 with ALCL and 6 with other PTCLs. Sixteen patients have not progressed—9 with ALCL and 5 with other PTCLs.
After progression, 5 patients received BV again, and 3 received stem cell transplants (2 allogeneic and 1 autologous).
The estimated 3-year PFS was 52%, and the estimated OS was 80%. The researchers noted that these rates compare favorably with the historical 3-year PFS and OS rates of 30% and 40%, respectively.
Researchers are currently conducting a phase 3 trial comparing BV+CHP with CHOP as frontline treatment of CD30+ mature T-cell lymphomas (ECHELON-2, NCT01777152).
Photo by Larry Young
SAN FRANCISCO—A combination treatment regimen can produce durable remissions in patients newly diagnosed with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), results of a phase 1 study suggest.
The patients received brentuximab vedotin plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisolone (BV+CHP). In some cases, this was followed by BV monotherapy.
The estimated 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) for these patients was 52%, and the overall survival (OS) was 80%.
There was a high rate of peripheral neuropathy (73%), but most cases resolved or improved over time.
Steven Horwitz, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, New York, and his colleagues presented these data as a poster at the 8th Annual T-cell Lymphoma Forum. The study was supported by Seattle Genetics and Millennium Pharmaceuticals.
The researchers presented data on 26 patients newly diagnosed with PTCL. Nineteen patients had systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL; 16 ALK- and 3 ALK+), 2 had PTCL not otherwise specified, 2 had angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, 2 had adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, and 1 had enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma.
The patients’ median age was 56 (range, 21-82). Sixty-nine percent of patients had an IPI score of 2 or higher, and 73% had stage III/IV disease.
Treatment
The patients received BV+CHP every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. Those who achieved at least a partial remission could go on to receive up to 10 additional cycles of single-agent BV at 1.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks.
Twenty-three patients (88%) completed all 6 cycles of BV+CHP, and 21 patients (81%) went on to receive BV monotherapy, 11 of whom (42%) received all 10 cycles.
Fifteen patients (58%) discontinued treatment, 3 due to progressive disease, 3 due to investigator decision, 6 due to adverse events, and 3 due to patient decision.
After a median observation period of 38.7 months (range, 4.6 to 44.3), 77% of patients (n=20) remained on study.
Toxicity
The most common adverse events (occurring in at least 30% of patients) were nausea (69%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (69%), diarrhea (62%), fatigue (58%), alopecia (54%), dyspnea (46%), constipation (35%), myalgia (31%), peripheral edema (31%), chills (31%), anemia (31%), insomnia (31%), and febrile neutropenia.
The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events (occurring in at least 10% of patients) were febrile neutropenia (31%), neutropenia (23%), anemia (15%), and pulmonary embolism (12%).
There were 6 adverse events resulting in treatment discontinuation—peripheral sensory neuropathy (n=3), abdominal pain (n=1), asthenia (n=1), and peripheral motor neuropathy (n=1).
Seventy-three percent of patients (19/26) experienced peripheral neuropathy. Thirty-seven percent (n=7) had a complete resolution of neuropathy, and 58% (n=11) had some improvement. The median time to resolution was 1.3 months. Twelve patients (63%) had ongoing neuropathy at last follow-up, but most had grade 1 (n=10).
Response and survival
The objective response rate was 100%, and the complete response rate was 88% (n=23). One patient who had a partial response at the end of combination therapy achieved a complete response after going on to single-agent BV.
Twenty-one of the 26 patients are still alive—15 with ALCL and 6 with other PTCLs. Sixteen patients have not progressed—9 with ALCL and 5 with other PTCLs.
After progression, 5 patients received BV again, and 3 received stem cell transplants (2 allogeneic and 1 autologous).
The estimated 3-year PFS was 52%, and the estimated OS was 80%. The researchers noted that these rates compare favorably with the historical 3-year PFS and OS rates of 30% and 40%, respectively.
Researchers are currently conducting a phase 3 trial comparing BV+CHP with CHOP as frontline treatment of CD30+ mature T-cell lymphomas (ECHELON-2, NCT01777152).