User login
EMA recommends orphan designation for LJPC-401
red blood cells
Image by Graham Beards
The European Medicines Agency’s (EMA’s) Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP) has adopted a positive opinion recommending that LJPC-401, a novel formulation of hepcidin, receive orphan designation to treat chronic iron overload requiring chelation therapy.
Chronic iron overload occurs in patients suffering from beta thalassemia, sickle cell disease, and hereditary hemochromatosis.
The COMP’s opinion, which is subject to review and approval by the European Commission, may include all or a subset of these conditions.
About LJPC-401
LJPC-401 is a novel formulation of hepcidin, an endogenous peptide hormone that is the body’s naturally occurring regulator of iron absorption and distribution. Hepcidin prevents excessive iron accumulation in tissues, such as the liver and heart, where it can cause significant damage and even result in death.
La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company is developing LJPC-401 for the treatment of iron overload occurring as a results of hereditary hemochromatosis, beta thalassemia, and sickle cell disease.
LJPC-401 has been shown to be effective in reducing serum iron in preclinical testing, according to La Jolla. The company said it expects to release preliminary results from a phase 1 trial of LJPC-401 by the end of this year.
About orphan designation
The EMA’s COMP adopts an opinion on the granting of orphan drug designation, and that opinion is submitted to the European Commission for endorsement.
In the European Union, orphan designation is granted to therapies intended to treat a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition that affects no more than 5 in 10,000 persons and where no satisfactory treatment is available.
Companies that obtain orphan designation for a drug benefit from a number of incentives, including protocol assistance, a type of scientific advice specific for designated orphan medicines, and 10 years of market exclusivity if the medicine is approved. Fee reductions are also available, depending on the status of the sponsor and the type of service required. 
red blood cells
Image by Graham Beards
The European Medicines Agency’s (EMA’s) Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP) has adopted a positive opinion recommending that LJPC-401, a novel formulation of hepcidin, receive orphan designation to treat chronic iron overload requiring chelation therapy.
Chronic iron overload occurs in patients suffering from beta thalassemia, sickle cell disease, and hereditary hemochromatosis.
The COMP’s opinion, which is subject to review and approval by the European Commission, may include all or a subset of these conditions.
About LJPC-401
LJPC-401 is a novel formulation of hepcidin, an endogenous peptide hormone that is the body’s naturally occurring regulator of iron absorption and distribution. Hepcidin prevents excessive iron accumulation in tissues, such as the liver and heart, where it can cause significant damage and even result in death.
La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company is developing LJPC-401 for the treatment of iron overload occurring as a results of hereditary hemochromatosis, beta thalassemia, and sickle cell disease.
LJPC-401 has been shown to be effective in reducing serum iron in preclinical testing, according to La Jolla. The company said it expects to release preliminary results from a phase 1 trial of LJPC-401 by the end of this year.
About orphan designation
The EMA’s COMP adopts an opinion on the granting of orphan drug designation, and that opinion is submitted to the European Commission for endorsement.
In the European Union, orphan designation is granted to therapies intended to treat a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition that affects no more than 5 in 10,000 persons and where no satisfactory treatment is available.
Companies that obtain orphan designation for a drug benefit from a number of incentives, including protocol assistance, a type of scientific advice specific for designated orphan medicines, and 10 years of market exclusivity if the medicine is approved. Fee reductions are also available, depending on the status of the sponsor and the type of service required.
red blood cells
Image by Graham Beards
The European Medicines Agency’s (EMA’s) Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP) has adopted a positive opinion recommending that LJPC-401, a novel formulation of hepcidin, receive orphan designation to treat chronic iron overload requiring chelation therapy.
Chronic iron overload occurs in patients suffering from beta thalassemia, sickle cell disease, and hereditary hemochromatosis.
The COMP’s opinion, which is subject to review and approval by the European Commission, may include all or a subset of these conditions.
About LJPC-401
LJPC-401 is a novel formulation of hepcidin, an endogenous peptide hormone that is the body’s naturally occurring regulator of iron absorption and distribution. Hepcidin prevents excessive iron accumulation in tissues, such as the liver and heart, where it can cause significant damage and even result in death.
La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company is developing LJPC-401 for the treatment of iron overload occurring as a results of hereditary hemochromatosis, beta thalassemia, and sickle cell disease.
LJPC-401 has been shown to be effective in reducing serum iron in preclinical testing, according to La Jolla. The company said it expects to release preliminary results from a phase 1 trial of LJPC-401 by the end of this year.
About orphan designation
The EMA’s COMP adopts an opinion on the granting of orphan drug designation, and that opinion is submitted to the European Commission for endorsement.
In the European Union, orphan designation is granted to therapies intended to treat a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition that affects no more than 5 in 10,000 persons and where no satisfactory treatment is available.
Companies that obtain orphan designation for a drug benefit from a number of incentives, including protocol assistance, a type of scientific advice specific for designated orphan medicines, and 10 years of market exclusivity if the medicine is approved. Fee reductions are also available, depending on the status of the sponsor and the type of service required.
EMA recommends orphan designation for CAR T-cell therapy
The European Medicines Agency’s (EMA’s) Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products has adopted a positive opinion recommending that KTE-C19 receive orphan designation to treat primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) and mantle cell lymphoma.
KTE-C19 is an investigational chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy designed to target CD19, a protein expressed on the cell surface of B-cell lymphomas and leukemias.
No other product candidate currently has orphan drug designation for the treatment of PMBCL in the European Union (EU).
KTE-C19 already has orphan drug designation to treat diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the US and the EU.
“We are conducting a phase 1/2 clinical trial of KTE-C19 in patients with refractory, aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including DLBCL and PMBCL, and plan to report initial topline results from the phase 1 portion of the trial later this year [at the ASH Annual Meeting],” said Arie Belldegrun, MD, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Kite Pharmaceuticals, the company developing KTE-C19.
Trial results
Last year, researchers reported results with KTE-C19 in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. The study included 15 patients with advanced B-cell malignancies.
The patients received a conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine, followed 1 day later by a single infusion of KTE-C19. The researchers noted that the conditioning regimen is known to be active against B-cell malignancies and could have made a direct contribution to patient responses.
Thirteen patients were evaluable for response. Eight patients achieved a complete response (CR), and 4 had a partial response (PR).
Of the 7 patients with chemotherapy-refractory DLBCL, 4 achieved a CR, 2 achieved a PR, and 1 had stable disease. Of the 4 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, 3 had a CR, and 1 had a PR. Among the 2 patients with indolent lymphomas, 1 achieved a CR, and 1 had a PR.
KTE-C19 was associated with fever, low blood pressure, focal neurological deficits, and delirium. Toxicities largely occurred in the first 2 weeks after infusion.
All but 2 patients experienced grade 3/4 adverse events. Four patients had grade 3/4 hypotension.
All patients had elevations in serum interferon gamma and/or interleukin 6 around the time of peak toxicity, but most did not develop elevations in serum tumor necrosis factor.
Neurologic toxicities included confusion and obtundation, which have been reported in previous studies. However, 3 patients developed unexpected neurologic abnormalities.
About orphan designation
The EMA’s Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products adopts an opinion on the granting of orphan designation, and that opinion is submitted to the European Commission for endorsement.
In the EU, orphan designation is granted to therapies intended to treat a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition that affects no more than 5 in 10,000 persons and where no satisfactory treatment is available.
Companies that obtain orphan designation for a drug benefit from a number of incentives, including protocol assistance, a type of scientific advice specific for designated orphan medicines, and 10 years of market exclusivity once the medicine is approved. Fee reductions are also available, depending on the status of the sponsor and the type of service required.
The European Medicines Agency’s (EMA’s) Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products has adopted a positive opinion recommending that KTE-C19 receive orphan designation to treat primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) and mantle cell lymphoma.
KTE-C19 is an investigational chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy designed to target CD19, a protein expressed on the cell surface of B-cell lymphomas and leukemias.
No other product candidate currently has orphan drug designation for the treatment of PMBCL in the European Union (EU).
KTE-C19 already has orphan drug designation to treat diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the US and the EU.
“We are conducting a phase 1/2 clinical trial of KTE-C19 in patients with refractory, aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including DLBCL and PMBCL, and plan to report initial topline results from the phase 1 portion of the trial later this year [at the ASH Annual Meeting],” said Arie Belldegrun, MD, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Kite Pharmaceuticals, the company developing KTE-C19.
Trial results
Last year, researchers reported results with KTE-C19 in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. The study included 15 patients with advanced B-cell malignancies.
The patients received a conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine, followed 1 day later by a single infusion of KTE-C19. The researchers noted that the conditioning regimen is known to be active against B-cell malignancies and could have made a direct contribution to patient responses.
Thirteen patients were evaluable for response. Eight patients achieved a complete response (CR), and 4 had a partial response (PR).
Of the 7 patients with chemotherapy-refractory DLBCL, 4 achieved a CR, 2 achieved a PR, and 1 had stable disease. Of the 4 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, 3 had a CR, and 1 had a PR. Among the 2 patients with indolent lymphomas, 1 achieved a CR, and 1 had a PR.
KTE-C19 was associated with fever, low blood pressure, focal neurological deficits, and delirium. Toxicities largely occurred in the first 2 weeks after infusion.
All but 2 patients experienced grade 3/4 adverse events. Four patients had grade 3/4 hypotension.
All patients had elevations in serum interferon gamma and/or interleukin 6 around the time of peak toxicity, but most did not develop elevations in serum tumor necrosis factor.
Neurologic toxicities included confusion and obtundation, which have been reported in previous studies. However, 3 patients developed unexpected neurologic abnormalities.
About orphan designation
The EMA’s Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products adopts an opinion on the granting of orphan designation, and that opinion is submitted to the European Commission for endorsement.
In the EU, orphan designation is granted to therapies intended to treat a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition that affects no more than 5 in 10,000 persons and where no satisfactory treatment is available.
Companies that obtain orphan designation for a drug benefit from a number of incentives, including protocol assistance, a type of scientific advice specific for designated orphan medicines, and 10 years of market exclusivity once the medicine is approved. Fee reductions are also available, depending on the status of the sponsor and the type of service required.
The European Medicines Agency’s (EMA’s) Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products has adopted a positive opinion recommending that KTE-C19 receive orphan designation to treat primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) and mantle cell lymphoma.
KTE-C19 is an investigational chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy designed to target CD19, a protein expressed on the cell surface of B-cell lymphomas and leukemias.
No other product candidate currently has orphan drug designation for the treatment of PMBCL in the European Union (EU).
KTE-C19 already has orphan drug designation to treat diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the US and the EU.
“We are conducting a phase 1/2 clinical trial of KTE-C19 in patients with refractory, aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including DLBCL and PMBCL, and plan to report initial topline results from the phase 1 portion of the trial later this year [at the ASH Annual Meeting],” said Arie Belldegrun, MD, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Kite Pharmaceuticals, the company developing KTE-C19.
Trial results
Last year, researchers reported results with KTE-C19 in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. The study included 15 patients with advanced B-cell malignancies.
The patients received a conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine, followed 1 day later by a single infusion of KTE-C19. The researchers noted that the conditioning regimen is known to be active against B-cell malignancies and could have made a direct contribution to patient responses.
Thirteen patients were evaluable for response. Eight patients achieved a complete response (CR), and 4 had a partial response (PR).
Of the 7 patients with chemotherapy-refractory DLBCL, 4 achieved a CR, 2 achieved a PR, and 1 had stable disease. Of the 4 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, 3 had a CR, and 1 had a PR. Among the 2 patients with indolent lymphomas, 1 achieved a CR, and 1 had a PR.
KTE-C19 was associated with fever, low blood pressure, focal neurological deficits, and delirium. Toxicities largely occurred in the first 2 weeks after infusion.
All but 2 patients experienced grade 3/4 adverse events. Four patients had grade 3/4 hypotension.
All patients had elevations in serum interferon gamma and/or interleukin 6 around the time of peak toxicity, but most did not develop elevations in serum tumor necrosis factor.
Neurologic toxicities included confusion and obtundation, which have been reported in previous studies. However, 3 patients developed unexpected neurologic abnormalities.
About orphan designation
The EMA’s Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products adopts an opinion on the granting of orphan designation, and that opinion is submitted to the European Commission for endorsement.
In the EU, orphan designation is granted to therapies intended to treat a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition that affects no more than 5 in 10,000 persons and where no satisfactory treatment is available.
Companies that obtain orphan designation for a drug benefit from a number of incentives, including protocol assistance, a type of scientific advice specific for designated orphan medicines, and 10 years of market exclusivity once the medicine is approved. Fee reductions are also available, depending on the status of the sponsor and the type of service required.
FDA grants drug orphan designation for hemophilia B
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted orphan designation for DTX101 as a treatment for hemophilia B.
DTX101 is designed to deliver factor IX gene expression in a durable fashion to prevent the long-term complications of hemophilia B.
Preclinical studies have indicated that DTX101 has the potential to be a well-tolerated, effective therapy for hemophilia B, according to Dimension Therapeutics, Inc., the company developing DTX101.
The company said it expects to initiate a multicenter, phase 1/2 study to evaluate DTX101 in adults with moderate/severe to severe hemophilia B by the end of this year.
About orphan designation
The FDA grants orphan designation to drugs and biologics intended to treat rare diseases or conditions that affect fewer than 200,000 people in the US.
Orphan designation provides the company developing a drug with certain benefits, such as tax credits for qualified clinical trials, exemption from FDA user fees, and 7 years of market exclusivity if the drug is approved.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted orphan designation for DTX101 as a treatment for hemophilia B.
DTX101 is designed to deliver factor IX gene expression in a durable fashion to prevent the long-term complications of hemophilia B.
Preclinical studies have indicated that DTX101 has the potential to be a well-tolerated, effective therapy for hemophilia B, according to Dimension Therapeutics, Inc., the company developing DTX101.
The company said it expects to initiate a multicenter, phase 1/2 study to evaluate DTX101 in adults with moderate/severe to severe hemophilia B by the end of this year.
About orphan designation
The FDA grants orphan designation to drugs and biologics intended to treat rare diseases or conditions that affect fewer than 200,000 people in the US.
Orphan designation provides the company developing a drug with certain benefits, such as tax credits for qualified clinical trials, exemption from FDA user fees, and 7 years of market exclusivity if the drug is approved.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted orphan designation for DTX101 as a treatment for hemophilia B.
DTX101 is designed to deliver factor IX gene expression in a durable fashion to prevent the long-term complications of hemophilia B.
Preclinical studies have indicated that DTX101 has the potential to be a well-tolerated, effective therapy for hemophilia B, according to Dimension Therapeutics, Inc., the company developing DTX101.
The company said it expects to initiate a multicenter, phase 1/2 study to evaluate DTX101 in adults with moderate/severe to severe hemophilia B by the end of this year.
About orphan designation
The FDA grants orphan designation to drugs and biologics intended to treat rare diseases or conditions that affect fewer than 200,000 people in the US.
Orphan designation provides the company developing a drug with certain benefits, such as tax credits for qualified clinical trials, exemption from FDA user fees, and 7 years of market exclusivity if the drug is approved.
Scientists describe new way to create etoposide
Scientists have reported a new way to produce the chemotherapeutic agent etoposide, and they believe this discovery could lead to a more stable supply of the drug.
Currently, producing etoposide requires isolating one of its precursors, (–)-podophyllotoxin, from the endangered, slow-growing, Himalayan Mayapple plant (Podophyllum hexandrum).
But researchers found they could generate the immediate precursor to etoposide—(–)-4’-desmethyl-epipodophyllotoxin—in a more easily accessible, faster-growing tobacco plant (Nicotiana benthamiana).
Elizabeth Sattely, PhD, of Stanford University in California, and her graduate student, Warren Lau, described this work in Science.
The pair noted that there are 4 known genes behind (–)-podophyllotoxin production, but the full recipe for this compound has eluded researchers, in part because of the Mayapple’s immense genome.
To tap into the Mayapple’s chemotherapeutic potential, Lau and Dr Sattely first focused on the 4 known genes—PLR, SDH, CYP719A23, and DIR. Then, they analyzed RNA sequencing data from the Mayapple to identify similar genes.
Next, the pair manipulated the tobacco plant to express multiple gene candidates at once and identified the resulting compounds in leaf tissue using mass spectrometry.
Dr Sattely and Lau identified 6 new genes—OMT3, CYP71CU1, OMT1, 2-ODD, CYP71BE54, and CYP82D61.
These genes, when expressed with the original 4, produce the immediate etoposide precursor (–)-4′-desmethyl-epipodophyllotoxin, which outperforms (–)-podophyllotoxin as a chemotherapy ingredient.
The researchers said this work has revealed a simpler and more direct route to etoposide that circumvents the semisynthetic epimerization and demethylation required to produce etoposide from (–)-podophyllotoxin.
However, Dr Sattely said the eventual goal is to use yeast instead of plants to produce etoposide. Yeast can be grown in large vats and may therefore provide a more stable source of drugs.
In addition, yeast provides the opportunity to modify genes to produce proteins with slightly different functions. And it may be possible to feed the yeast a slightly different starting product, thereby changing the chemical a molecular assembly line churns out.
These approaches could provide a way of tweaking existing drugs in an effort to improve them.
Scientists have reported a new way to produce the chemotherapeutic agent etoposide, and they believe this discovery could lead to a more stable supply of the drug.
Currently, producing etoposide requires isolating one of its precursors, (–)-podophyllotoxin, from the endangered, slow-growing, Himalayan Mayapple plant (Podophyllum hexandrum).
But researchers found they could generate the immediate precursor to etoposide—(–)-4’-desmethyl-epipodophyllotoxin—in a more easily accessible, faster-growing tobacco plant (Nicotiana benthamiana).
Elizabeth Sattely, PhD, of Stanford University in California, and her graduate student, Warren Lau, described this work in Science.
The pair noted that there are 4 known genes behind (–)-podophyllotoxin production, but the full recipe for this compound has eluded researchers, in part because of the Mayapple’s immense genome.
To tap into the Mayapple’s chemotherapeutic potential, Lau and Dr Sattely first focused on the 4 known genes—PLR, SDH, CYP719A23, and DIR. Then, they analyzed RNA sequencing data from the Mayapple to identify similar genes.
Next, the pair manipulated the tobacco plant to express multiple gene candidates at once and identified the resulting compounds in leaf tissue using mass spectrometry.
Dr Sattely and Lau identified 6 new genes—OMT3, CYP71CU1, OMT1, 2-ODD, CYP71BE54, and CYP82D61.
These genes, when expressed with the original 4, produce the immediate etoposide precursor (–)-4′-desmethyl-epipodophyllotoxin, which outperforms (–)-podophyllotoxin as a chemotherapy ingredient.
The researchers said this work has revealed a simpler and more direct route to etoposide that circumvents the semisynthetic epimerization and demethylation required to produce etoposide from (–)-podophyllotoxin.
However, Dr Sattely said the eventual goal is to use yeast instead of plants to produce etoposide. Yeast can be grown in large vats and may therefore provide a more stable source of drugs.
In addition, yeast provides the opportunity to modify genes to produce proteins with slightly different functions. And it may be possible to feed the yeast a slightly different starting product, thereby changing the chemical a molecular assembly line churns out.
These approaches could provide a way of tweaking existing drugs in an effort to improve them.
Scientists have reported a new way to produce the chemotherapeutic agent etoposide, and they believe this discovery could lead to a more stable supply of the drug.
Currently, producing etoposide requires isolating one of its precursors, (–)-podophyllotoxin, from the endangered, slow-growing, Himalayan Mayapple plant (Podophyllum hexandrum).
But researchers found they could generate the immediate precursor to etoposide—(–)-4’-desmethyl-epipodophyllotoxin—in a more easily accessible, faster-growing tobacco plant (Nicotiana benthamiana).
Elizabeth Sattely, PhD, of Stanford University in California, and her graduate student, Warren Lau, described this work in Science.
The pair noted that there are 4 known genes behind (–)-podophyllotoxin production, but the full recipe for this compound has eluded researchers, in part because of the Mayapple’s immense genome.
To tap into the Mayapple’s chemotherapeutic potential, Lau and Dr Sattely first focused on the 4 known genes—PLR, SDH, CYP719A23, and DIR. Then, they analyzed RNA sequencing data from the Mayapple to identify similar genes.
Next, the pair manipulated the tobacco plant to express multiple gene candidates at once and identified the resulting compounds in leaf tissue using mass spectrometry.
Dr Sattely and Lau identified 6 new genes—OMT3, CYP71CU1, OMT1, 2-ODD, CYP71BE54, and CYP82D61.
These genes, when expressed with the original 4, produce the immediate etoposide precursor (–)-4′-desmethyl-epipodophyllotoxin, which outperforms (–)-podophyllotoxin as a chemotherapy ingredient.
The researchers said this work has revealed a simpler and more direct route to etoposide that circumvents the semisynthetic epimerization and demethylation required to produce etoposide from (–)-podophyllotoxin.
However, Dr Sattely said the eventual goal is to use yeast instead of plants to produce etoposide. Yeast can be grown in large vats and may therefore provide a more stable source of drugs.
In addition, yeast provides the opportunity to modify genes to produce proteins with slightly different functions. And it may be possible to feed the yeast a slightly different starting product, thereby changing the chemical a molecular assembly line churns out.
These approaches could provide a way of tweaking existing drugs in an effort to improve them.
Drug granted orphan designation for AML
Image by Lance Liotta
The investigational therapy SL-401 has received orphan designation to treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the European Union (EU).
SL-401 targets the interleukin-3 receptor (IL-3R). It is comprised of human IL-3 coupled to a truncated diphtheria toxin payload that inhibits protein synthesis.
SL-401 is under development to treat a range of hematologic malignancies, as IL-3R is overexpressed on cancer stem cells in multiple hematologic malignancies.
SL-401 has orphan designation from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of AML and blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN).
SL-401 research
At ASH 2012 (abstract 3625), researchers reported results with SL-401 in a study of patients with AML, BPDCN, and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).
At that time, the study had enrolled 80 patients, including 59 with relapsed or refractory AML, 11 with de novo AML unfit for chemotherapy, 7 with high-risk MDS, and 3 with relapsed/refractory BPDCN.
Patients received a single cycle of SL-401 as a 15-minute intravenous infusion in 1 of 2 dosing regimens to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and assess antitumor activity.
With regimen A, 45 patients received doses ranging from 4 to 12.5 μg/kg every other day for up to 6 doses. With regimen B, 35 patients received doses ranging from 7.1 to 22.1 μg/kg daily for up to 5 doses.
Of the 59 patients with relapsed/refractory AML, 2 achieved complete responses (CRs), 5 had partial responses (PRs), and 8 had minor responses (MRs). One CR lasted more than 8 months, and the other lasted more than 25 months.
Of the 11 patients with AML who were not candidates for chemotherapy, 2 had PRs and 1 had an MR. Among the 7 patients with high-risk MDS, there was 1 PR and 1 MR.
And among the 3 patients with BPDCN, there were 2 CRs. One CR lasted more than 2 months, and the other lasted more than 4 months.
The MTD was not achieved with regimen A, but the MTD for regimen B was 16.6 μg/kg/day. The dose-limiting toxicities were a gastrointestinal bleed (n=1), transaminase and creatinine kinase elevations (n=1), and capillary leak syndrome (n=3). There was no evidence of treatment-related bone marrow suppression.
Last year, researchers reported additional results in BPDCN patients (Frankel et al, Blood 2014).
Eleven BPDCN patients received a single course of SL-401 (at 12.5 μg/kg intravenously over 15 minutes) daily for up to 5 doses. Three patients who had initial responses to SL-401 received a second course while in relapse.
Seven of 9 evaluable (78%) patients responded to a single course of SL-401. There were 5 CRs and 2 PRs. The median duration of responses was 5 months (range, 1-20+ months).
The most common adverse events were transient and included fever, chills, hypotension, edema, hypoalbuminemia, thrombocytopenia, and transaminasemia.
Three multicenter clinical trials of SL-401 are currently open in the following indications:
- BPDCN and relapsed/refractory AML
- AML patients in first complete remission with minimal residual disease
- Four types of advanced, high-risk myeloproliferative neoplasms, including systemic mastocytosis, advanced symptomatic hypereosinophilic disorder, myelofibrosis, and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.
Additional SL-401 studies are planned for patients with myeloma, lymphomas, and other leukemias.
About orphan designation
In the EU, orphan designation is granted to therapies intended to treat a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition that affects no more than 5 in 10,000 persons and where no satisfactory treatment is available.
Companies that obtain orphan designation for a drug in the EU benefit from a number of incentives, including protocol assistance, a type of scientific advice specific for designated orphan medicines, and 10 years of market exclusivity once the medicine is on the market. Fee reductions are also available, depending on the status of the sponsor and the type of service required.
The FDA grants orphan designation to drugs that are intended to treat diseases or conditions affecting fewer than 200,000 patients in the US.
In the US, orphan designation provides the sponsor of a drug with various development incentives, including opportunities to apply for research-related tax credits and grant funding, assistance in designing clinical trials, and 7 years of US market exclusivity if the drug is approved.
Image by Lance Liotta
The investigational therapy SL-401 has received orphan designation to treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the European Union (EU).
SL-401 targets the interleukin-3 receptor (IL-3R). It is comprised of human IL-3 coupled to a truncated diphtheria toxin payload that inhibits protein synthesis.
SL-401 is under development to treat a range of hematologic malignancies, as IL-3R is overexpressed on cancer stem cells in multiple hematologic malignancies.
SL-401 has orphan designation from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of AML and blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN).
SL-401 research
At ASH 2012 (abstract 3625), researchers reported results with SL-401 in a study of patients with AML, BPDCN, and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).
At that time, the study had enrolled 80 patients, including 59 with relapsed or refractory AML, 11 with de novo AML unfit for chemotherapy, 7 with high-risk MDS, and 3 with relapsed/refractory BPDCN.
Patients received a single cycle of SL-401 as a 15-minute intravenous infusion in 1 of 2 dosing regimens to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and assess antitumor activity.
With regimen A, 45 patients received doses ranging from 4 to 12.5 μg/kg every other day for up to 6 doses. With regimen B, 35 patients received doses ranging from 7.1 to 22.1 μg/kg daily for up to 5 doses.
Of the 59 patients with relapsed/refractory AML, 2 achieved complete responses (CRs), 5 had partial responses (PRs), and 8 had minor responses (MRs). One CR lasted more than 8 months, and the other lasted more than 25 months.
Of the 11 patients with AML who were not candidates for chemotherapy, 2 had PRs and 1 had an MR. Among the 7 patients with high-risk MDS, there was 1 PR and 1 MR.
And among the 3 patients with BPDCN, there were 2 CRs. One CR lasted more than 2 months, and the other lasted more than 4 months.
The MTD was not achieved with regimen A, but the MTD for regimen B was 16.6 μg/kg/day. The dose-limiting toxicities were a gastrointestinal bleed (n=1), transaminase and creatinine kinase elevations (n=1), and capillary leak syndrome (n=3). There was no evidence of treatment-related bone marrow suppression.
Last year, researchers reported additional results in BPDCN patients (Frankel et al, Blood 2014).
Eleven BPDCN patients received a single course of SL-401 (at 12.5 μg/kg intravenously over 15 minutes) daily for up to 5 doses. Three patients who had initial responses to SL-401 received a second course while in relapse.
Seven of 9 evaluable (78%) patients responded to a single course of SL-401. There were 5 CRs and 2 PRs. The median duration of responses was 5 months (range, 1-20+ months).
The most common adverse events were transient and included fever, chills, hypotension, edema, hypoalbuminemia, thrombocytopenia, and transaminasemia.
Three multicenter clinical trials of SL-401 are currently open in the following indications:
- BPDCN and relapsed/refractory AML
- AML patients in first complete remission with minimal residual disease
- Four types of advanced, high-risk myeloproliferative neoplasms, including systemic mastocytosis, advanced symptomatic hypereosinophilic disorder, myelofibrosis, and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.
Additional SL-401 studies are planned for patients with myeloma, lymphomas, and other leukemias.
About orphan designation
In the EU, orphan designation is granted to therapies intended to treat a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition that affects no more than 5 in 10,000 persons and where no satisfactory treatment is available.
Companies that obtain orphan designation for a drug in the EU benefit from a number of incentives, including protocol assistance, a type of scientific advice specific for designated orphan medicines, and 10 years of market exclusivity once the medicine is on the market. Fee reductions are also available, depending on the status of the sponsor and the type of service required.
The FDA grants orphan designation to drugs that are intended to treat diseases or conditions affecting fewer than 200,000 patients in the US.
In the US, orphan designation provides the sponsor of a drug with various development incentives, including opportunities to apply for research-related tax credits and grant funding, assistance in designing clinical trials, and 7 years of US market exclusivity if the drug is approved.
Image by Lance Liotta
The investigational therapy SL-401 has received orphan designation to treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the European Union (EU).
SL-401 targets the interleukin-3 receptor (IL-3R). It is comprised of human IL-3 coupled to a truncated diphtheria toxin payload that inhibits protein synthesis.
SL-401 is under development to treat a range of hematologic malignancies, as IL-3R is overexpressed on cancer stem cells in multiple hematologic malignancies.
SL-401 has orphan designation from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of AML and blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN).
SL-401 research
At ASH 2012 (abstract 3625), researchers reported results with SL-401 in a study of patients with AML, BPDCN, and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).
At that time, the study had enrolled 80 patients, including 59 with relapsed or refractory AML, 11 with de novo AML unfit for chemotherapy, 7 with high-risk MDS, and 3 with relapsed/refractory BPDCN.
Patients received a single cycle of SL-401 as a 15-minute intravenous infusion in 1 of 2 dosing regimens to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and assess antitumor activity.
With regimen A, 45 patients received doses ranging from 4 to 12.5 μg/kg every other day for up to 6 doses. With regimen B, 35 patients received doses ranging from 7.1 to 22.1 μg/kg daily for up to 5 doses.
Of the 59 patients with relapsed/refractory AML, 2 achieved complete responses (CRs), 5 had partial responses (PRs), and 8 had minor responses (MRs). One CR lasted more than 8 months, and the other lasted more than 25 months.
Of the 11 patients with AML who were not candidates for chemotherapy, 2 had PRs and 1 had an MR. Among the 7 patients with high-risk MDS, there was 1 PR and 1 MR.
And among the 3 patients with BPDCN, there were 2 CRs. One CR lasted more than 2 months, and the other lasted more than 4 months.
The MTD was not achieved with regimen A, but the MTD for regimen B was 16.6 μg/kg/day. The dose-limiting toxicities were a gastrointestinal bleed (n=1), transaminase and creatinine kinase elevations (n=1), and capillary leak syndrome (n=3). There was no evidence of treatment-related bone marrow suppression.
Last year, researchers reported additional results in BPDCN patients (Frankel et al, Blood 2014).
Eleven BPDCN patients received a single course of SL-401 (at 12.5 μg/kg intravenously over 15 minutes) daily for up to 5 doses. Three patients who had initial responses to SL-401 received a second course while in relapse.
Seven of 9 evaluable (78%) patients responded to a single course of SL-401. There were 5 CRs and 2 PRs. The median duration of responses was 5 months (range, 1-20+ months).
The most common adverse events were transient and included fever, chills, hypotension, edema, hypoalbuminemia, thrombocytopenia, and transaminasemia.
Three multicenter clinical trials of SL-401 are currently open in the following indications:
- BPDCN and relapsed/refractory AML
- AML patients in first complete remission with minimal residual disease
- Four types of advanced, high-risk myeloproliferative neoplasms, including systemic mastocytosis, advanced symptomatic hypereosinophilic disorder, myelofibrosis, and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.
Additional SL-401 studies are planned for patients with myeloma, lymphomas, and other leukemias.
About orphan designation
In the EU, orphan designation is granted to therapies intended to treat a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition that affects no more than 5 in 10,000 persons and where no satisfactory treatment is available.
Companies that obtain orphan designation for a drug in the EU benefit from a number of incentives, including protocol assistance, a type of scientific advice specific for designated orphan medicines, and 10 years of market exclusivity once the medicine is on the market. Fee reductions are also available, depending on the status of the sponsor and the type of service required.
The FDA grants orphan designation to drugs that are intended to treat diseases or conditions affecting fewer than 200,000 patients in the US.
In the US, orphan designation provides the sponsor of a drug with various development incentives, including opportunities to apply for research-related tax credits and grant funding, assistance in designing clinical trials, and 7 years of US market exclusivity if the drug is approved.
Blood cancer drugs set to be removed from CDF
Photo courtesy of CDC
England’s National Health Service (NHS) plans to remove several drugs used to treat hematologic malignancies from the Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF).
The plan is that, as of November 4, 2015, pomalidomide, lenalidomide, ibrutinib, dasatinib, brentuximab, bosutinib, and bendamustine will no longer be funded via the CDF for certain indications.
Ofatumumab was removed from the CDF list yesterday but is now available through the NHS.
Drugs used to treat solid tumor malignancies are set to be de-funded through CDF in November as well.
However, the NHS said the proposal to remove a drug from the CDF is not necessarily a final decision.
In cases where a drug offers enough clinical benefit, the pharmaceutical company developing that drug has the opportunity to reduce the price they are asking the NHS to pay to ensure that it achieves a satisfactory level of value for money. The NHS said a number of such negotiations are underway.
In addition, patients who are currently receiving the drugs set to be removed from the CDF will continue to have access to those drugs.
About the CDF and the NHS
The CDF—set up in 2010 and currently due to run until March 2016—is money the government has set aside to pay for cancer drugs that haven’t been approved by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and aren’t available within the NHS in England. Most cancer drugs are routinely funded outside of the CDF.
NHS England and NICE are planning to consult on a proposed new system for commissioning cancer drugs. The NHS said the new system will be designed to provide the agency with a more systematic approach to getting the best price for cancer drugs.
Reason for drug removals
The NHS previously increased the budget for the CDF from £200 million in 2013/14, to £280 million in 2014/15, and £340 million from April 2015. This represents a total increase of 70% since August 2014.
However, current projections suggest that spending would rise to around £410 million for this year, an over-spend of £70 million, in the absence of further prioritization. The NHS said this money could be used for other aspects of cancer treatment or NHS services for other patient groups.
Therefore, some drugs are set to be removed from the CDF. The NHS said all decisions on drugs to be maintained in the CDF were based on the advice of clinicians, the best available evidence, and the cost of the treatment.
“There is no escaping the fact that we face a difficult set of choices, but it is our duty to ensure we get maximum value from every penny available on behalf of patients,” said Peter Clark, chair of the CDF.
“We must ensure we invest in those treatments that offer the most benefit, based on rigorous evidence-based clinical analysis and an assessment of the cost of those treatments.”
While de-funding certain drugs will reduce costs, the CDF is not expected to be back on budget this financial year. The NHS does expect the CDF will be operating within its budget during 2016/17.
Blood cancer drugs to be removed
The following drugs are currently on the CDF list for the following indications, but they are set to be de-listed on November 4, 2015.
Bendamustine
For the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- CLL (not licensed in this indication)
- Second-line indication, third-line indication, or fourth-line indication
- To be used within the treating Trust’s governance framework, as bendamustine is not licensed in this indication
For the treatment of relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- MCL
- Option for second- or subsequent-line chemotherapy
- No previous treatment with bendamustine
- To be used within the treating Trust’s governance framework, as bendamustine is not licensed in this indication
*Bendamustine will remain on the CDF for other indications.
Bosutinib
For the treatment of refractory, chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Chronic phase CML
- Refractory to nilotinib or dasatinib (if dasatinib accessed via a clinical trial or via its current approved CDF indication)
For the treatment of refractory, accelerated phase CML where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Accelerated phase CML
- Refractory to nilotinib or dasatinib (if dasatinib accessed via a clinical trial or via its current approved CDF indication)
- Significant intolerance to nilotinib (grade 3 or 4 events)
For the treatment of accelerated phase CML where there is intolerance of treatments and where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Accelerated phase CML
- Significant intolerance to dasatinib (grade 3 or 4 adverse events; if dasatinib accessed via its current approved CDF indication)
- Significant intolerance to nilotinib (grade 3 or 4 events)
*Bosutinib will still be available through the CDF for patients with chronic phase CML that is intolerant of other treatments.
Brentuximab
For the treatment of refractory, systemic anaplastic lymphoma where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Relapsed or refractory systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma
For the treatment of relapsed or refractory CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Relapsed or refractory CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma
- Following autologous stem cell transplant or following at least 2 prior therapies when autologous stem cell transplant or multi-agent chemotherapy is not an option
Dasatinib
For the treatment of Philadelphia-chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Refractory or significant intolerance or resistance to prior therapy including imatinib (grade 3 or 4 adverse events)
- Second-line indication or third-line indication
*Dasatinib will still be available for chronic phase and accelerated phase CML.
Ibrutinib
For the treatment of relapsed/refractory CLL where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Confirmed CLL
- Must have received at least 1 prior therapy for CLL
- Considered not appropriate for treatment or retreatment with purine-analogue-based therapy due to:
- Failure to respond to chemo-immunotherapy or
- A progression-free interval of less than 3 years or
- Age of 70 years or more or
- Age of 65 years or more plus the presence of comorbidities or
- A 17p or TP53 deletion
- ECOG performance status of 0-2
- A neutrophil count of ≥0.75 x 10⁹/L
- A platelet count of ≥30 x 10⁹/L
- Patient not on warfarin or CYP3A4/5 inhibitors
- No prior treatment with idelalisib
For the treatment of relapsed/refractory MCL where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Confirmed MCL with cyclin D1 overexpression or translocation breakpoints at t(11;14)
- Failure to achieve at least partial response with, or documented disease progression disease after, the most recent treatment regimen
- ECOG performance status of 0-2
- At least 1 but no more than 5 previous lines of treatment
Lenalidomide
For the second-line treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- MM
- Second-line indication
- Contraindication to bortezomib or previously received bortezomib in the first-line setting
*Lenalidomide will still be available for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with 5q deletion.
Pomalidomide
For the treatment of relapsed and refractory MM where the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically
- MM
- Performance status of 0-2
- Previously received treatment with adequate trials of at least all of the following options of therapy: bortezomib, lenalidomide, and alkylating agents
- Failed treatment with bortezomib or lenalidomide, as defined by: progression on or before 60 days of treatment, progressive disease 6 months or less after achieving a partial response, or intolerance to bortezomib
- Refractory disease to previous treatment
- No resistance to high-dose dexamethasone used in the last line of therapy
- No peripheral neuropathy of grade 2 or more
A complete list of proposed changes to the CDF, as well as the drugs that were de-listed on March 12, 2015, is available on the NHS website.
Photo courtesy of CDC
England’s National Health Service (NHS) plans to remove several drugs used to treat hematologic malignancies from the Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF).
The plan is that, as of November 4, 2015, pomalidomide, lenalidomide, ibrutinib, dasatinib, brentuximab, bosutinib, and bendamustine will no longer be funded via the CDF for certain indications.
Ofatumumab was removed from the CDF list yesterday but is now available through the NHS.
Drugs used to treat solid tumor malignancies are set to be de-funded through CDF in November as well.
However, the NHS said the proposal to remove a drug from the CDF is not necessarily a final decision.
In cases where a drug offers enough clinical benefit, the pharmaceutical company developing that drug has the opportunity to reduce the price they are asking the NHS to pay to ensure that it achieves a satisfactory level of value for money. The NHS said a number of such negotiations are underway.
In addition, patients who are currently receiving the drugs set to be removed from the CDF will continue to have access to those drugs.
About the CDF and the NHS
The CDF—set up in 2010 and currently due to run until March 2016—is money the government has set aside to pay for cancer drugs that haven’t been approved by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and aren’t available within the NHS in England. Most cancer drugs are routinely funded outside of the CDF.
NHS England and NICE are planning to consult on a proposed new system for commissioning cancer drugs. The NHS said the new system will be designed to provide the agency with a more systematic approach to getting the best price for cancer drugs.
Reason for drug removals
The NHS previously increased the budget for the CDF from £200 million in 2013/14, to £280 million in 2014/15, and £340 million from April 2015. This represents a total increase of 70% since August 2014.
However, current projections suggest that spending would rise to around £410 million for this year, an over-spend of £70 million, in the absence of further prioritization. The NHS said this money could be used for other aspects of cancer treatment or NHS services for other patient groups.
Therefore, some drugs are set to be removed from the CDF. The NHS said all decisions on drugs to be maintained in the CDF were based on the advice of clinicians, the best available evidence, and the cost of the treatment.
“There is no escaping the fact that we face a difficult set of choices, but it is our duty to ensure we get maximum value from every penny available on behalf of patients,” said Peter Clark, chair of the CDF.
“We must ensure we invest in those treatments that offer the most benefit, based on rigorous evidence-based clinical analysis and an assessment of the cost of those treatments.”
While de-funding certain drugs will reduce costs, the CDF is not expected to be back on budget this financial year. The NHS does expect the CDF will be operating within its budget during 2016/17.
Blood cancer drugs to be removed
The following drugs are currently on the CDF list for the following indications, but they are set to be de-listed on November 4, 2015.
Bendamustine
For the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- CLL (not licensed in this indication)
- Second-line indication, third-line indication, or fourth-line indication
- To be used within the treating Trust’s governance framework, as bendamustine is not licensed in this indication
For the treatment of relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- MCL
- Option for second- or subsequent-line chemotherapy
- No previous treatment with bendamustine
- To be used within the treating Trust’s governance framework, as bendamustine is not licensed in this indication
*Bendamustine will remain on the CDF for other indications.
Bosutinib
For the treatment of refractory, chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Chronic phase CML
- Refractory to nilotinib or dasatinib (if dasatinib accessed via a clinical trial or via its current approved CDF indication)
For the treatment of refractory, accelerated phase CML where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Accelerated phase CML
- Refractory to nilotinib or dasatinib (if dasatinib accessed via a clinical trial or via its current approved CDF indication)
- Significant intolerance to nilotinib (grade 3 or 4 events)
For the treatment of accelerated phase CML where there is intolerance of treatments and where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Accelerated phase CML
- Significant intolerance to dasatinib (grade 3 or 4 adverse events; if dasatinib accessed via its current approved CDF indication)
- Significant intolerance to nilotinib (grade 3 or 4 events)
*Bosutinib will still be available through the CDF for patients with chronic phase CML that is intolerant of other treatments.
Brentuximab
For the treatment of refractory, systemic anaplastic lymphoma where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Relapsed or refractory systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma
For the treatment of relapsed or refractory CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Relapsed or refractory CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma
- Following autologous stem cell transplant or following at least 2 prior therapies when autologous stem cell transplant or multi-agent chemotherapy is not an option
Dasatinib
For the treatment of Philadelphia-chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Refractory or significant intolerance or resistance to prior therapy including imatinib (grade 3 or 4 adverse events)
- Second-line indication or third-line indication
*Dasatinib will still be available for chronic phase and accelerated phase CML.
Ibrutinib
For the treatment of relapsed/refractory CLL where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Confirmed CLL
- Must have received at least 1 prior therapy for CLL
- Considered not appropriate for treatment or retreatment with purine-analogue-based therapy due to:
- Failure to respond to chemo-immunotherapy or
- A progression-free interval of less than 3 years or
- Age of 70 years or more or
- Age of 65 years or more plus the presence of comorbidities or
- A 17p or TP53 deletion
- ECOG performance status of 0-2
- A neutrophil count of ≥0.75 x 10⁹/L
- A platelet count of ≥30 x 10⁹/L
- Patient not on warfarin or CYP3A4/5 inhibitors
- No prior treatment with idelalisib
For the treatment of relapsed/refractory MCL where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Confirmed MCL with cyclin D1 overexpression or translocation breakpoints at t(11;14)
- Failure to achieve at least partial response with, or documented disease progression disease after, the most recent treatment regimen
- ECOG performance status of 0-2
- At least 1 but no more than 5 previous lines of treatment
Lenalidomide
For the second-line treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- MM
- Second-line indication
- Contraindication to bortezomib or previously received bortezomib in the first-line setting
*Lenalidomide will still be available for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with 5q deletion.
Pomalidomide
For the treatment of relapsed and refractory MM where the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically
- MM
- Performance status of 0-2
- Previously received treatment with adequate trials of at least all of the following options of therapy: bortezomib, lenalidomide, and alkylating agents
- Failed treatment with bortezomib or lenalidomide, as defined by: progression on or before 60 days of treatment, progressive disease 6 months or less after achieving a partial response, or intolerance to bortezomib
- Refractory disease to previous treatment
- No resistance to high-dose dexamethasone used in the last line of therapy
- No peripheral neuropathy of grade 2 or more
A complete list of proposed changes to the CDF, as well as the drugs that were de-listed on March 12, 2015, is available on the NHS website.
Photo courtesy of CDC
England’s National Health Service (NHS) plans to remove several drugs used to treat hematologic malignancies from the Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF).
The plan is that, as of November 4, 2015, pomalidomide, lenalidomide, ibrutinib, dasatinib, brentuximab, bosutinib, and bendamustine will no longer be funded via the CDF for certain indications.
Ofatumumab was removed from the CDF list yesterday but is now available through the NHS.
Drugs used to treat solid tumor malignancies are set to be de-funded through CDF in November as well.
However, the NHS said the proposal to remove a drug from the CDF is not necessarily a final decision.
In cases where a drug offers enough clinical benefit, the pharmaceutical company developing that drug has the opportunity to reduce the price they are asking the NHS to pay to ensure that it achieves a satisfactory level of value for money. The NHS said a number of such negotiations are underway.
In addition, patients who are currently receiving the drugs set to be removed from the CDF will continue to have access to those drugs.
About the CDF and the NHS
The CDF—set up in 2010 and currently due to run until March 2016—is money the government has set aside to pay for cancer drugs that haven’t been approved by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and aren’t available within the NHS in England. Most cancer drugs are routinely funded outside of the CDF.
NHS England and NICE are planning to consult on a proposed new system for commissioning cancer drugs. The NHS said the new system will be designed to provide the agency with a more systematic approach to getting the best price for cancer drugs.
Reason for drug removals
The NHS previously increased the budget for the CDF from £200 million in 2013/14, to £280 million in 2014/15, and £340 million from April 2015. This represents a total increase of 70% since August 2014.
However, current projections suggest that spending would rise to around £410 million for this year, an over-spend of £70 million, in the absence of further prioritization. The NHS said this money could be used for other aspects of cancer treatment or NHS services for other patient groups.
Therefore, some drugs are set to be removed from the CDF. The NHS said all decisions on drugs to be maintained in the CDF were based on the advice of clinicians, the best available evidence, and the cost of the treatment.
“There is no escaping the fact that we face a difficult set of choices, but it is our duty to ensure we get maximum value from every penny available on behalf of patients,” said Peter Clark, chair of the CDF.
“We must ensure we invest in those treatments that offer the most benefit, based on rigorous evidence-based clinical analysis and an assessment of the cost of those treatments.”
While de-funding certain drugs will reduce costs, the CDF is not expected to be back on budget this financial year. The NHS does expect the CDF will be operating within its budget during 2016/17.
Blood cancer drugs to be removed
The following drugs are currently on the CDF list for the following indications, but they are set to be de-listed on November 4, 2015.
Bendamustine
For the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- CLL (not licensed in this indication)
- Second-line indication, third-line indication, or fourth-line indication
- To be used within the treating Trust’s governance framework, as bendamustine is not licensed in this indication
For the treatment of relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- MCL
- Option for second- or subsequent-line chemotherapy
- No previous treatment with bendamustine
- To be used within the treating Trust’s governance framework, as bendamustine is not licensed in this indication
*Bendamustine will remain on the CDF for other indications.
Bosutinib
For the treatment of refractory, chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Chronic phase CML
- Refractory to nilotinib or dasatinib (if dasatinib accessed via a clinical trial or via its current approved CDF indication)
For the treatment of refractory, accelerated phase CML where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Accelerated phase CML
- Refractory to nilotinib or dasatinib (if dasatinib accessed via a clinical trial or via its current approved CDF indication)
- Significant intolerance to nilotinib (grade 3 or 4 events)
For the treatment of accelerated phase CML where there is intolerance of treatments and where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Accelerated phase CML
- Significant intolerance to dasatinib (grade 3 or 4 adverse events; if dasatinib accessed via its current approved CDF indication)
- Significant intolerance to nilotinib (grade 3 or 4 events)
*Bosutinib will still be available through the CDF for patients with chronic phase CML that is intolerant of other treatments.
Brentuximab
For the treatment of refractory, systemic anaplastic lymphoma where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Relapsed or refractory systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma
For the treatment of relapsed or refractory CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Relapsed or refractory CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma
- Following autologous stem cell transplant or following at least 2 prior therapies when autologous stem cell transplant or multi-agent chemotherapy is not an option
Dasatinib
For the treatment of Philadelphia-chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Refractory or significant intolerance or resistance to prior therapy including imatinib (grade 3 or 4 adverse events)
- Second-line indication or third-line indication
*Dasatinib will still be available for chronic phase and accelerated phase CML.
Ibrutinib
For the treatment of relapsed/refractory CLL where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Confirmed CLL
- Must have received at least 1 prior therapy for CLL
- Considered not appropriate for treatment or retreatment with purine-analogue-based therapy due to:
- Failure to respond to chemo-immunotherapy or
- A progression-free interval of less than 3 years or
- Age of 70 years or more or
- Age of 65 years or more plus the presence of comorbidities or
- A 17p or TP53 deletion
- ECOG performance status of 0-2
- A neutrophil count of ≥0.75 x 10⁹/L
- A platelet count of ≥30 x 10⁹/L
- Patient not on warfarin or CYP3A4/5 inhibitors
- No prior treatment with idelalisib
For the treatment of relapsed/refractory MCL where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Confirmed MCL with cyclin D1 overexpression or translocation breakpoints at t(11;14)
- Failure to achieve at least partial response with, or documented disease progression disease after, the most recent treatment regimen
- ECOG performance status of 0-2
- At least 1 but no more than 5 previous lines of treatment
Lenalidomide
For the second-line treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) where all the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
- MM
- Second-line indication
- Contraindication to bortezomib or previously received bortezomib in the first-line setting
*Lenalidomide will still be available for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with 5q deletion.
Pomalidomide
For the treatment of relapsed and refractory MM where the following criteria are met:
- Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically
- MM
- Performance status of 0-2
- Previously received treatment with adequate trials of at least all of the following options of therapy: bortezomib, lenalidomide, and alkylating agents
- Failed treatment with bortezomib or lenalidomide, as defined by: progression on or before 60 days of treatment, progressive disease 6 months or less after achieving a partial response, or intolerance to bortezomib
- Refractory disease to previous treatment
- No resistance to high-dose dexamethasone used in the last line of therapy
- No peripheral neuropathy of grade 2 or more
A complete list of proposed changes to the CDF, as well as the drugs that were de-listed on March 12, 2015, is available on the NHS website.
HDAC inhibitor approved for MM in EU
Photo courtesy of Novartis
The European Commission has approved panobinostat (Farydak) for use in combination with other agents to treat patients with relapsed and/or refractory
multiple myeloma (MM).
The histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor is now approved, in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone, to treat adults with MM who have received at least 2 prior treatment regimens, including bortezomib and an immunomodulatory agent (IMiD).
The approval marks the first time an HDAC inhibitor with epigenetic activity is available in the European Union (EU). The approval applies to all 28 EU member states plus Iceland, Norway, and Liechtenstein.
The European Commission approved panobinostat based on results of a subgroup analysis of 147 patients in the phase 3 PANORAMA-1 trial.
PANORAMA-1 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 768 MM patients. The study showed that, overall, panobinostat plus bortezomib and dexamethasone increased progression-free survival (PFS) by about 4 months when compared to placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone.
Full results of the PANORAMA-1 study were published in The Lancet Oncology last year. Results from the substudy of 147 patients were presented at ASCO 2015.
The 147 patients had relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM and had received 2 or more prior regimens, including bortezomib and an IMiD.
The median PFS benefit in this subgroup increased by 7.8 months in the panobinostat arm compared to the placebo arm. The median PFS was 12.5 months (n=73) and 4.7 months (n=74), respectively (hazard ratio=0.47).
Common grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events in the panobinostat arm and placebo arm, respectively, included diarrhea (33.3% vs 15.1%), asthenia/fatigue (26.4% vs 13.7%), and peripheral neuropathy (16.7% vs 6.8%).
The most common grade 3/4 hematologic events in the panobinostat arm and placebo arm, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (68.1% vs 44.4%), lymphopenia (48.6% vs 49.3%), and neutropenia (40.3% vs 16.4%).
Cardiac events (most frequently atrial fibrillation, tachycardia, palpitation, and sinus tachycardia) were reported in 17.6% of panobinostat-treated patients and 9.8% of placebo-treated patients. Syncope was reported in 6.0% and 2.4%, respectively.
The percentage of on-treatment deaths was similar in the panobinostat and placebo arms—6.9% and 6.8%, respectively. But on-treatment deaths not due to the study indication (MM) were reported in 6.8% and 3.2% of patients, respectively.
Panobinostat in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone is also approved in the US, Chile, and Japan for certain patients with previously treated MM. The exact indication for panobinostat varies by country.
Photo courtesy of Novartis
The European Commission has approved panobinostat (Farydak) for use in combination with other agents to treat patients with relapsed and/or refractory
multiple myeloma (MM).
The histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor is now approved, in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone, to treat adults with MM who have received at least 2 prior treatment regimens, including bortezomib and an immunomodulatory agent (IMiD).
The approval marks the first time an HDAC inhibitor with epigenetic activity is available in the European Union (EU). The approval applies to all 28 EU member states plus Iceland, Norway, and Liechtenstein.
The European Commission approved panobinostat based on results of a subgroup analysis of 147 patients in the phase 3 PANORAMA-1 trial.
PANORAMA-1 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 768 MM patients. The study showed that, overall, panobinostat plus bortezomib and dexamethasone increased progression-free survival (PFS) by about 4 months when compared to placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone.
Full results of the PANORAMA-1 study were published in The Lancet Oncology last year. Results from the substudy of 147 patients were presented at ASCO 2015.
The 147 patients had relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM and had received 2 or more prior regimens, including bortezomib and an IMiD.
The median PFS benefit in this subgroup increased by 7.8 months in the panobinostat arm compared to the placebo arm. The median PFS was 12.5 months (n=73) and 4.7 months (n=74), respectively (hazard ratio=0.47).
Common grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events in the panobinostat arm and placebo arm, respectively, included diarrhea (33.3% vs 15.1%), asthenia/fatigue (26.4% vs 13.7%), and peripheral neuropathy (16.7% vs 6.8%).
The most common grade 3/4 hematologic events in the panobinostat arm and placebo arm, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (68.1% vs 44.4%), lymphopenia (48.6% vs 49.3%), and neutropenia (40.3% vs 16.4%).
Cardiac events (most frequently atrial fibrillation, tachycardia, palpitation, and sinus tachycardia) were reported in 17.6% of panobinostat-treated patients and 9.8% of placebo-treated patients. Syncope was reported in 6.0% and 2.4%, respectively.
The percentage of on-treatment deaths was similar in the panobinostat and placebo arms—6.9% and 6.8%, respectively. But on-treatment deaths not due to the study indication (MM) were reported in 6.8% and 3.2% of patients, respectively.
Panobinostat in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone is also approved in the US, Chile, and Japan for certain patients with previously treated MM. The exact indication for panobinostat varies by country.
Photo courtesy of Novartis
The European Commission has approved panobinostat (Farydak) for use in combination with other agents to treat patients with relapsed and/or refractory
multiple myeloma (MM).
The histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor is now approved, in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone, to treat adults with MM who have received at least 2 prior treatment regimens, including bortezomib and an immunomodulatory agent (IMiD).
The approval marks the first time an HDAC inhibitor with epigenetic activity is available in the European Union (EU). The approval applies to all 28 EU member states plus Iceland, Norway, and Liechtenstein.
The European Commission approved panobinostat based on results of a subgroup analysis of 147 patients in the phase 3 PANORAMA-1 trial.
PANORAMA-1 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 768 MM patients. The study showed that, overall, panobinostat plus bortezomib and dexamethasone increased progression-free survival (PFS) by about 4 months when compared to placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone.
Full results of the PANORAMA-1 study were published in The Lancet Oncology last year. Results from the substudy of 147 patients were presented at ASCO 2015.
The 147 patients had relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM and had received 2 or more prior regimens, including bortezomib and an IMiD.
The median PFS benefit in this subgroup increased by 7.8 months in the panobinostat arm compared to the placebo arm. The median PFS was 12.5 months (n=73) and 4.7 months (n=74), respectively (hazard ratio=0.47).
Common grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events in the panobinostat arm and placebo arm, respectively, included diarrhea (33.3% vs 15.1%), asthenia/fatigue (26.4% vs 13.7%), and peripheral neuropathy (16.7% vs 6.8%).
The most common grade 3/4 hematologic events in the panobinostat arm and placebo arm, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (68.1% vs 44.4%), lymphopenia (48.6% vs 49.3%), and neutropenia (40.3% vs 16.4%).
Cardiac events (most frequently atrial fibrillation, tachycardia, palpitation, and sinus tachycardia) were reported in 17.6% of panobinostat-treated patients and 9.8% of placebo-treated patients. Syncope was reported in 6.0% and 2.4%, respectively.
The percentage of on-treatment deaths was similar in the panobinostat and placebo arms—6.9% and 6.8%, respectively. But on-treatment deaths not due to the study indication (MM) were reported in 6.8% and 3.2% of patients, respectively.
Panobinostat in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone is also approved in the US, Chile, and Japan for certain patients with previously treated MM. The exact indication for panobinostat varies by country.
FDA expands use of antiplatelet agent
Image by Andre E.X. Brown
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has expanded the approved use of the antiplatelet agent ticagrelor (Brilinta).
The FDA first approved ticagrelor in 2011 to reduce the rate of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
Now, the agency has approved a 60 mg dose that can be used long-term. The 60 mg tablet is expected to be available in pharmacies by the end of this month.
The recommended dosing for ticagrelor is a loading dose of 180 mg, followed by 90 mg twice daily during the first year after the ACS event. The drug is combined with aspirin, typically at a loading dose of 325 mg, followed by a daily maintenance dose of 75-100 mg.
After 1 year, patients can now receive ticagrelor at 60 mg twice daily.
The expanded indication for ticagrelor has been approved under FDA Priority Review, a designation granted to medicines with the potential to provide significant improvements in the treatment, prevention, or diagnosis of a disease.
Ticagrelor has been approved in more than 100 countries and is included in 12 major ACS treatment guidelines globally. The drug is under development by AstraZeneca.
Trial results
The FDA’s expanded approval of ticagrelor is based on results of the PEGASUS TIMI-54 trial, a large-scale study involving more than 21,000 patients.
Investigators compared ticagrelor (at 60 mg or 90 mg) plus low-dose aspirin to placebo plus low-dose aspirin in patients who had experienced a heart attack 1 to 3 years prior to study enrollment.
The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. And the investigators found that patients in either ticagrelor arm were significantly less likely to achieve this endpoint.
At 3 years, the proportion of patients meeting the endpoint was 7.85% in the 90 mg group, 7.77% in the 60 mg group, and 9.04% in the placebo group (P=0.008 for 90 mg vs placebo and P=0.004 for 60 mg vs placebo).
Patients receiving ticagrelor also had a significantly higher incidence of major bleeding and dyspnea. The rate of TIMI major bleeding was 2.60% in the 90 mg group, 2.30% in the 60 mg group, and 1.06% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for each ticagrelor dose vs placebo).
The rate of dyspnea was 18.93% in the 90 mg group, 15.84% in 60 mg group, and 6.38% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The rate of dyspnea leading to treatment discontinuation was 6.5% in the 90 mg group, 4.55% in the 60 mg group, and 0.79% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for both).
Image by Andre E.X. Brown
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has expanded the approved use of the antiplatelet agent ticagrelor (Brilinta).
The FDA first approved ticagrelor in 2011 to reduce the rate of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
Now, the agency has approved a 60 mg dose that can be used long-term. The 60 mg tablet is expected to be available in pharmacies by the end of this month.
The recommended dosing for ticagrelor is a loading dose of 180 mg, followed by 90 mg twice daily during the first year after the ACS event. The drug is combined with aspirin, typically at a loading dose of 325 mg, followed by a daily maintenance dose of 75-100 mg.
After 1 year, patients can now receive ticagrelor at 60 mg twice daily.
The expanded indication for ticagrelor has been approved under FDA Priority Review, a designation granted to medicines with the potential to provide significant improvements in the treatment, prevention, or diagnosis of a disease.
Ticagrelor has been approved in more than 100 countries and is included in 12 major ACS treatment guidelines globally. The drug is under development by AstraZeneca.
Trial results
The FDA’s expanded approval of ticagrelor is based on results of the PEGASUS TIMI-54 trial, a large-scale study involving more than 21,000 patients.
Investigators compared ticagrelor (at 60 mg or 90 mg) plus low-dose aspirin to placebo plus low-dose aspirin in patients who had experienced a heart attack 1 to 3 years prior to study enrollment.
The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. And the investigators found that patients in either ticagrelor arm were significantly less likely to achieve this endpoint.
At 3 years, the proportion of patients meeting the endpoint was 7.85% in the 90 mg group, 7.77% in the 60 mg group, and 9.04% in the placebo group (P=0.008 for 90 mg vs placebo and P=0.004 for 60 mg vs placebo).
Patients receiving ticagrelor also had a significantly higher incidence of major bleeding and dyspnea. The rate of TIMI major bleeding was 2.60% in the 90 mg group, 2.30% in the 60 mg group, and 1.06% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for each ticagrelor dose vs placebo).
The rate of dyspnea was 18.93% in the 90 mg group, 15.84% in 60 mg group, and 6.38% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The rate of dyspnea leading to treatment discontinuation was 6.5% in the 90 mg group, 4.55% in the 60 mg group, and 0.79% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for both).
Image by Andre E.X. Brown
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has expanded the approved use of the antiplatelet agent ticagrelor (Brilinta).
The FDA first approved ticagrelor in 2011 to reduce the rate of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
Now, the agency has approved a 60 mg dose that can be used long-term. The 60 mg tablet is expected to be available in pharmacies by the end of this month.
The recommended dosing for ticagrelor is a loading dose of 180 mg, followed by 90 mg twice daily during the first year after the ACS event. The drug is combined with aspirin, typically at a loading dose of 325 mg, followed by a daily maintenance dose of 75-100 mg.
After 1 year, patients can now receive ticagrelor at 60 mg twice daily.
The expanded indication for ticagrelor has been approved under FDA Priority Review, a designation granted to medicines with the potential to provide significant improvements in the treatment, prevention, or diagnosis of a disease.
Ticagrelor has been approved in more than 100 countries and is included in 12 major ACS treatment guidelines globally. The drug is under development by AstraZeneca.
Trial results
The FDA’s expanded approval of ticagrelor is based on results of the PEGASUS TIMI-54 trial, a large-scale study involving more than 21,000 patients.
Investigators compared ticagrelor (at 60 mg or 90 mg) plus low-dose aspirin to placebo plus low-dose aspirin in patients who had experienced a heart attack 1 to 3 years prior to study enrollment.
The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. And the investigators found that patients in either ticagrelor arm were significantly less likely to achieve this endpoint.
At 3 years, the proportion of patients meeting the endpoint was 7.85% in the 90 mg group, 7.77% in the 60 mg group, and 9.04% in the placebo group (P=0.008 for 90 mg vs placebo and P=0.004 for 60 mg vs placebo).
Patients receiving ticagrelor also had a significantly higher incidence of major bleeding and dyspnea. The rate of TIMI major bleeding was 2.60% in the 90 mg group, 2.30% in the 60 mg group, and 1.06% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for each ticagrelor dose vs placebo).
The rate of dyspnea was 18.93% in the 90 mg group, 15.84% in 60 mg group, and 6.38% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The rate of dyspnea leading to treatment discontinuation was 6.5% in the 90 mg group, 4.55% in the 60 mg group, and 0.79% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for both).
FDA updates warning about Treanda
Photo by Rhoda Baer
Last March, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a statement warning healthcare professionals not to use the chemotherapy drug Treanda Injection (bendamustine hydrochloride) with closed system transfer devices (CSTDs), adapters, and syringes containing polycarbonate or acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS).
Now, the FDA is providing a list of devices that were tested and deemed compatible with the drug (see the tables below).
The devices were tested by Treanda’s manufacturer, Teva Pharmaceuticals.
Treanda is used to treat patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma that has progressed during or within 6 months of treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen.
Treanda is available in 2 formulations: a solution, Treanda Injection (45 mg/0.5 mL or 180 mg/2 mL solution), and a lyophilized powder, Treanda for Injection (25 mg/vial or 100 mg/vial lyophilized powder). The information discussed here is referring to compatibility with the solution, Treanda Injection.
Treanda Injection contains N, N-dimethylacetamide (DMA), which is incompatible with devices that contain polycarbonate or ABS. Devices including CSTDs, adapters, and syringes that contain polycarbonate or ABS have been shown to dissolve when they come in contact with DMA in the drug.
This incompatibility leads to device failure, such as leaking, breaking, or operational failure of CSTD components; possible product contamination; and potential serious adverse health consequences to practitioners, such as skin reactions, or to patients, including the risk of small blood vessel blockage if the product is contaminated with dissolved ABS or polycarbonate.
Users should contact device manufacturers prior to using the specific devices listed below to ensure there have been no changes made to the material composition of the devices and that the devices are compatible with Treanda use.
Table 1. The compatibility of Treanda Injection with specific CSTDs, syringes, vial adapters, and gloves (based on testing conducted by Teva from February 2015 through June 2015).
| Component tested | Component brand name (part number) |
| Closed system transfer devices (CSTDs) | BD Phaseal System consisting of:
BD Phaseal Protector P14 (REF 515100), BD Phaseal Injector Luer Lock N35 (REF 515003), BD Phaseal Infusion Adapter C100 (REF 515306), BD syringe 5 mL (REF 309646 and 309657) |
| Vial adapters | Baxter CHEMO-AIDE Dispensing Pin (REF 2N9106)
Medimop Swabable Vial Adapter (REF 8070101) Alaris Smartsite (REF 2202E and 2203E) |
| Polypropylene syringes | BD (Becton Dickinson), 5 mL (REF 309646) and 3 mL (REF 309657)
Covidien Monoject, 5 mL (REF 1180600777) and 3 mL (REF 1180300777) B. Braun, 5 mL (REF 4617053V-02) and 3 mL (REF 4610303-02) Air-Tite Norm Jet, 5 mL (REF 4050.X00V0) and 3 mL (REF 4020.X00V0) Medline, 5 mL (REF SYR105010) and 3 mL (REF SYR103010) Terumo, 5 mL (REF SS-05L) |
| Disposable gloves* | ChemoPlus (REF CT0194-1)
EP-Blue (REF 181350) Jackson Safety G29 (REF 49824) NeoPro (REF NPG-888) NitriDerm (REF 182350) Purple (REF 50604) Purple KC 500 (REF 55084) UltraSense EC (REF USE-880) |
*Part numbers reflect a specific size glove used in the compatibility tests.
Table 2. The IV administration set found to be compatible with Treanda Injection after dilution in a 500 mL 0.9% sodium chloride IV infusion bags (based on testing conducted by Teva from February 2015 through June 2015*).
| Component tested | Brand name (part number) |
| IV administration sets | B. Braun Safeline (REF NF3482) and AdditIV (REF V1921)
Baxter DuoVent Spike (REF 2C7575) and Clearlink System (2H8480) BD Phaseal Secondary set (REF 515301) ICU Medical Clave (REF CH3011) |
*Compatibility studies did not include testing with 2.5% dextrose/0.45% sodium chloride injection. However, the results of these studies are not expected to change. So either diluent, 0.9% sodium chloride or 2.5% dextrose/0.45% sodium chloride injection, can be used with Treanda injection.
The FDA required label changes for both the solution and the powder formulations of Treanda to include information for safe preparation and handling for IV administration. See the full prescribing information for details.
For more details on the compatibility of Treanda Injection with specific CSTDs, syringes, vial adapters, gloves, and IV administration sets, see Teva’s Dear Health Care Provider letter.
Adverse events or quality problems associated with the use of Treanda products can be reported to the FDA’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting Program.
Photo by Rhoda Baer
Last March, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a statement warning healthcare professionals not to use the chemotherapy drug Treanda Injection (bendamustine hydrochloride) with closed system transfer devices (CSTDs), adapters, and syringes containing polycarbonate or acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS).
Now, the FDA is providing a list of devices that were tested and deemed compatible with the drug (see the tables below).
The devices were tested by Treanda’s manufacturer, Teva Pharmaceuticals.
Treanda is used to treat patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma that has progressed during or within 6 months of treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen.
Treanda is available in 2 formulations: a solution, Treanda Injection (45 mg/0.5 mL or 180 mg/2 mL solution), and a lyophilized powder, Treanda for Injection (25 mg/vial or 100 mg/vial lyophilized powder). The information discussed here is referring to compatibility with the solution, Treanda Injection.
Treanda Injection contains N, N-dimethylacetamide (DMA), which is incompatible with devices that contain polycarbonate or ABS. Devices including CSTDs, adapters, and syringes that contain polycarbonate or ABS have been shown to dissolve when they come in contact with DMA in the drug.
This incompatibility leads to device failure, such as leaking, breaking, or operational failure of CSTD components; possible product contamination; and potential serious adverse health consequences to practitioners, such as skin reactions, or to patients, including the risk of small blood vessel blockage if the product is contaminated with dissolved ABS or polycarbonate.
Users should contact device manufacturers prior to using the specific devices listed below to ensure there have been no changes made to the material composition of the devices and that the devices are compatible with Treanda use.
Table 1. The compatibility of Treanda Injection with specific CSTDs, syringes, vial adapters, and gloves (based on testing conducted by Teva from February 2015 through June 2015).
| Component tested | Component brand name (part number) |
| Closed system transfer devices (CSTDs) | BD Phaseal System consisting of:
BD Phaseal Protector P14 (REF 515100), BD Phaseal Injector Luer Lock N35 (REF 515003), BD Phaseal Infusion Adapter C100 (REF 515306), BD syringe 5 mL (REF 309646 and 309657) |
| Vial adapters | Baxter CHEMO-AIDE Dispensing Pin (REF 2N9106)
Medimop Swabable Vial Adapter (REF 8070101) Alaris Smartsite (REF 2202E and 2203E) |
| Polypropylene syringes | BD (Becton Dickinson), 5 mL (REF 309646) and 3 mL (REF 309657)
Covidien Monoject, 5 mL (REF 1180600777) and 3 mL (REF 1180300777) B. Braun, 5 mL (REF 4617053V-02) and 3 mL (REF 4610303-02) Air-Tite Norm Jet, 5 mL (REF 4050.X00V0) and 3 mL (REF 4020.X00V0) Medline, 5 mL (REF SYR105010) and 3 mL (REF SYR103010) Terumo, 5 mL (REF SS-05L) |
| Disposable gloves* | ChemoPlus (REF CT0194-1)
EP-Blue (REF 181350) Jackson Safety G29 (REF 49824) NeoPro (REF NPG-888) NitriDerm (REF 182350) Purple (REF 50604) Purple KC 500 (REF 55084) UltraSense EC (REF USE-880) |
*Part numbers reflect a specific size glove used in the compatibility tests.
Table 2. The IV administration set found to be compatible with Treanda Injection after dilution in a 500 mL 0.9% sodium chloride IV infusion bags (based on testing conducted by Teva from February 2015 through June 2015*).
| Component tested | Brand name (part number) |
| IV administration sets | B. Braun Safeline (REF NF3482) and AdditIV (REF V1921)
Baxter DuoVent Spike (REF 2C7575) and Clearlink System (2H8480) BD Phaseal Secondary set (REF 515301) ICU Medical Clave (REF CH3011) |
*Compatibility studies did not include testing with 2.5% dextrose/0.45% sodium chloride injection. However, the results of these studies are not expected to change. So either diluent, 0.9% sodium chloride or 2.5% dextrose/0.45% sodium chloride injection, can be used with Treanda injection.
The FDA required label changes for both the solution and the powder formulations of Treanda to include information for safe preparation and handling for IV administration. See the full prescribing information for details.
For more details on the compatibility of Treanda Injection with specific CSTDs, syringes, vial adapters, gloves, and IV administration sets, see Teva’s Dear Health Care Provider letter.
Adverse events or quality problems associated with the use of Treanda products can be reported to the FDA’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting Program.
Photo by Rhoda Baer
Last March, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a statement warning healthcare professionals not to use the chemotherapy drug Treanda Injection (bendamustine hydrochloride) with closed system transfer devices (CSTDs), adapters, and syringes containing polycarbonate or acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS).
Now, the FDA is providing a list of devices that were tested and deemed compatible with the drug (see the tables below).
The devices were tested by Treanda’s manufacturer, Teva Pharmaceuticals.
Treanda is used to treat patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma that has progressed during or within 6 months of treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen.
Treanda is available in 2 formulations: a solution, Treanda Injection (45 mg/0.5 mL or 180 mg/2 mL solution), and a lyophilized powder, Treanda for Injection (25 mg/vial or 100 mg/vial lyophilized powder). The information discussed here is referring to compatibility with the solution, Treanda Injection.
Treanda Injection contains N, N-dimethylacetamide (DMA), which is incompatible with devices that contain polycarbonate or ABS. Devices including CSTDs, adapters, and syringes that contain polycarbonate or ABS have been shown to dissolve when they come in contact with DMA in the drug.
This incompatibility leads to device failure, such as leaking, breaking, or operational failure of CSTD components; possible product contamination; and potential serious adverse health consequences to practitioners, such as skin reactions, or to patients, including the risk of small blood vessel blockage if the product is contaminated with dissolved ABS or polycarbonate.
Users should contact device manufacturers prior to using the specific devices listed below to ensure there have been no changes made to the material composition of the devices and that the devices are compatible with Treanda use.
Table 1. The compatibility of Treanda Injection with specific CSTDs, syringes, vial adapters, and gloves (based on testing conducted by Teva from February 2015 through June 2015).
| Component tested | Component brand name (part number) |
| Closed system transfer devices (CSTDs) | BD Phaseal System consisting of:
BD Phaseal Protector P14 (REF 515100), BD Phaseal Injector Luer Lock N35 (REF 515003), BD Phaseal Infusion Adapter C100 (REF 515306), BD syringe 5 mL (REF 309646 and 309657) |
| Vial adapters | Baxter CHEMO-AIDE Dispensing Pin (REF 2N9106)
Medimop Swabable Vial Adapter (REF 8070101) Alaris Smartsite (REF 2202E and 2203E) |
| Polypropylene syringes | BD (Becton Dickinson), 5 mL (REF 309646) and 3 mL (REF 309657)
Covidien Monoject, 5 mL (REF 1180600777) and 3 mL (REF 1180300777) B. Braun, 5 mL (REF 4617053V-02) and 3 mL (REF 4610303-02) Air-Tite Norm Jet, 5 mL (REF 4050.X00V0) and 3 mL (REF 4020.X00V0) Medline, 5 mL (REF SYR105010) and 3 mL (REF SYR103010) Terumo, 5 mL (REF SS-05L) |
| Disposable gloves* | ChemoPlus (REF CT0194-1)
EP-Blue (REF 181350) Jackson Safety G29 (REF 49824) NeoPro (REF NPG-888) NitriDerm (REF 182350) Purple (REF 50604) Purple KC 500 (REF 55084) UltraSense EC (REF USE-880) |
*Part numbers reflect a specific size glove used in the compatibility tests.
Table 2. The IV administration set found to be compatible with Treanda Injection after dilution in a 500 mL 0.9% sodium chloride IV infusion bags (based on testing conducted by Teva from February 2015 through June 2015*).
| Component tested | Brand name (part number) |
| IV administration sets | B. Braun Safeline (REF NF3482) and AdditIV (REF V1921)
Baxter DuoVent Spike (REF 2C7575) and Clearlink System (2H8480) BD Phaseal Secondary set (REF 515301) ICU Medical Clave (REF CH3011) |
*Compatibility studies did not include testing with 2.5% dextrose/0.45% sodium chloride injection. However, the results of these studies are not expected to change. So either diluent, 0.9% sodium chloride or 2.5% dextrose/0.45% sodium chloride injection, can be used with Treanda injection.
The FDA required label changes for both the solution and the powder formulations of Treanda to include information for safe preparation and handling for IV administration. See the full prescribing information for details.
For more details on the compatibility of Treanda Injection with specific CSTDs, syringes, vial adapters, gloves, and IV administration sets, see Teva’s Dear Health Care Provider letter.
Adverse events or quality problems associated with the use of Treanda products can be reported to the FDA’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting Program.
Drug deemed ‘breakthrough’ for hemophilia A with inhibitors
Photo by Linda Bartlett
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted breakthrough therapy designation for ACE910 to prevent bleeding in hemophilia A patients age 12 and older who have factor VIII inhibitors.
ACE910 is the first factor VIIIa-mimetic bispecific antibody to be investigated for the prophylactic treatment of hemophilia A.
Breakthrough therapy designation is designed to accelerate the development and review of medicines that demonstrate early clinical evidence of a substantial improvement over current treatment options for serious diseases.
The breakthrough therapy designation for ACE910 was granted based on results of a phase 1 study of ACE910 in patients with severe hemophilia A.
About ACE910
ACE910 is an investigational, humanized, bispecific monoclonal antibody engineered to simultaneously bind factors IXa and X. ACE910 thereby mimics the cofactor function of factor VIII and is designed to promote blood coagulation in hemophilia A patients, regardless of whether they have developed inhibitors to factor VIII.
ACE910 is administered subcutaneously once weekly. As it is distinct in structure from factor VIII, it is not expected to lead to the formation of factor VIII inhibitors.
ACE910 was created by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and is being co-developed by Genentech.
ACE910 research
Results of the phase 1 trial suggested that once-weekly, subcutaneous administration of ACE910 can reduce annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) in adults and adolescents with severe hemophilia A, with or without factor VIII inhibitors.
At ISTH 2015 (abstract AS017), researchers presented data on 18 Japanese patients with severe hemophilia A (factor VIII: C<1%, ages 12 to 58 years).
Patients received once-weekly subcutaneous ACE910 at one of the following dose levels: 0.3 mg/kg (cohort 1), 1 mg/kg (cohort 2), or 3 mg/kg (cohort 3). There were 6 patients in each cohort.
The patients were followed for 5.6 months to 18.5 months.
Efficacy
Whether or not they had inhibitors, patients experienced a decrease in ABR with ACE910. The changes in ABR per treatment cohort and according to inhibitor status are as follows:
| Treatment/patient type | N | ABR reduction | Median ABR change |
| Cohort 1 (0.3 mg/kg) without inhibitors | 2/6 | 22.8%-82.7% | 32.5→1.7 |
| Cohort 1 (0.3 mg/kg) with inhibitors | 4/6 | 49.3%-100% | |
| Cohort 2 (1 mg/kg) without inhibitors | 2/6 | 79.6%-100% | 18.3→0 |
| Cohort 2 (1 mg/kg) with inhibitors | 4/6 | 87.0%-100% | |
| Cohort 3 (3 mg/kg) without inhibitors | 3/6 | 0%*-100% | 15.2→0 |
| Cohort 3 (3 mg/kg) with inhibitors | 3/6 | 93.0%-100% |
*One patient did not report bleeding episodes at baseline or during the study.
Safety
There were 93 adverse events. The researchers said all events were of mild or moderate intensity. One patient discontinued ACE910 due to mild injection-site redness.
There were no thromboembolic events, even when ACE910 was given concomitantly with factor VIII products or bypassing agents as episodic treatment for breakthrough bleeds.
Three patients developed anti-ACE910 antibodies, but they did not affect ACE910 pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics.
Genentech is planning to initiate a phase 3 trial of ACE910 in patients with hemophilia A and factor VIII inhibitors by the end of 2015, a phase 3 trial in patients without inhibitors in 2016, and a trial in pediatric patients with hemophilia A in 2016.
Photo by Linda Bartlett
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted breakthrough therapy designation for ACE910 to prevent bleeding in hemophilia A patients age 12 and older who have factor VIII inhibitors.
ACE910 is the first factor VIIIa-mimetic bispecific antibody to be investigated for the prophylactic treatment of hemophilia A.
Breakthrough therapy designation is designed to accelerate the development and review of medicines that demonstrate early clinical evidence of a substantial improvement over current treatment options for serious diseases.
The breakthrough therapy designation for ACE910 was granted based on results of a phase 1 study of ACE910 in patients with severe hemophilia A.
About ACE910
ACE910 is an investigational, humanized, bispecific monoclonal antibody engineered to simultaneously bind factors IXa and X. ACE910 thereby mimics the cofactor function of factor VIII and is designed to promote blood coagulation in hemophilia A patients, regardless of whether they have developed inhibitors to factor VIII.
ACE910 is administered subcutaneously once weekly. As it is distinct in structure from factor VIII, it is not expected to lead to the formation of factor VIII inhibitors.
ACE910 was created by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and is being co-developed by Genentech.
ACE910 research
Results of the phase 1 trial suggested that once-weekly, subcutaneous administration of ACE910 can reduce annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) in adults and adolescents with severe hemophilia A, with or without factor VIII inhibitors.
At ISTH 2015 (abstract AS017), researchers presented data on 18 Japanese patients with severe hemophilia A (factor VIII: C<1%, ages 12 to 58 years).
Patients received once-weekly subcutaneous ACE910 at one of the following dose levels: 0.3 mg/kg (cohort 1), 1 mg/kg (cohort 2), or 3 mg/kg (cohort 3). There were 6 patients in each cohort.
The patients were followed for 5.6 months to 18.5 months.
Efficacy
Whether or not they had inhibitors, patients experienced a decrease in ABR with ACE910. The changes in ABR per treatment cohort and according to inhibitor status are as follows:
| Treatment/patient type | N | ABR reduction | Median ABR change |
| Cohort 1 (0.3 mg/kg) without inhibitors | 2/6 | 22.8%-82.7% | 32.5→1.7 |
| Cohort 1 (0.3 mg/kg) with inhibitors | 4/6 | 49.3%-100% | |
| Cohort 2 (1 mg/kg) without inhibitors | 2/6 | 79.6%-100% | 18.3→0 |
| Cohort 2 (1 mg/kg) with inhibitors | 4/6 | 87.0%-100% | |
| Cohort 3 (3 mg/kg) without inhibitors | 3/6 | 0%*-100% | 15.2→0 |
| Cohort 3 (3 mg/kg) with inhibitors | 3/6 | 93.0%-100% |
*One patient did not report bleeding episodes at baseline or during the study.
Safety
There were 93 adverse events. The researchers said all events were of mild or moderate intensity. One patient discontinued ACE910 due to mild injection-site redness.
There were no thromboembolic events, even when ACE910 was given concomitantly with factor VIII products or bypassing agents as episodic treatment for breakthrough bleeds.
Three patients developed anti-ACE910 antibodies, but they did not affect ACE910 pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics.
Genentech is planning to initiate a phase 3 trial of ACE910 in patients with hemophilia A and factor VIII inhibitors by the end of 2015, a phase 3 trial in patients without inhibitors in 2016, and a trial in pediatric patients with hemophilia A in 2016.
Photo by Linda Bartlett
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted breakthrough therapy designation for ACE910 to prevent bleeding in hemophilia A patients age 12 and older who have factor VIII inhibitors.
ACE910 is the first factor VIIIa-mimetic bispecific antibody to be investigated for the prophylactic treatment of hemophilia A.
Breakthrough therapy designation is designed to accelerate the development and review of medicines that demonstrate early clinical evidence of a substantial improvement over current treatment options for serious diseases.
The breakthrough therapy designation for ACE910 was granted based on results of a phase 1 study of ACE910 in patients with severe hemophilia A.
About ACE910
ACE910 is an investigational, humanized, bispecific monoclonal antibody engineered to simultaneously bind factors IXa and X. ACE910 thereby mimics the cofactor function of factor VIII and is designed to promote blood coagulation in hemophilia A patients, regardless of whether they have developed inhibitors to factor VIII.
ACE910 is administered subcutaneously once weekly. As it is distinct in structure from factor VIII, it is not expected to lead to the formation of factor VIII inhibitors.
ACE910 was created by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and is being co-developed by Genentech.
ACE910 research
Results of the phase 1 trial suggested that once-weekly, subcutaneous administration of ACE910 can reduce annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) in adults and adolescents with severe hemophilia A, with or without factor VIII inhibitors.
At ISTH 2015 (abstract AS017), researchers presented data on 18 Japanese patients with severe hemophilia A (factor VIII: C<1%, ages 12 to 58 years).
Patients received once-weekly subcutaneous ACE910 at one of the following dose levels: 0.3 mg/kg (cohort 1), 1 mg/kg (cohort 2), or 3 mg/kg (cohort 3). There were 6 patients in each cohort.
The patients were followed for 5.6 months to 18.5 months.
Efficacy
Whether or not they had inhibitors, patients experienced a decrease in ABR with ACE910. The changes in ABR per treatment cohort and according to inhibitor status are as follows:
| Treatment/patient type | N | ABR reduction | Median ABR change |
| Cohort 1 (0.3 mg/kg) without inhibitors | 2/6 | 22.8%-82.7% | 32.5→1.7 |
| Cohort 1 (0.3 mg/kg) with inhibitors | 4/6 | 49.3%-100% | |
| Cohort 2 (1 mg/kg) without inhibitors | 2/6 | 79.6%-100% | 18.3→0 |
| Cohort 2 (1 mg/kg) with inhibitors | 4/6 | 87.0%-100% | |
| Cohort 3 (3 mg/kg) without inhibitors | 3/6 | 0%*-100% | 15.2→0 |
| Cohort 3 (3 mg/kg) with inhibitors | 3/6 | 93.0%-100% |
*One patient did not report bleeding episodes at baseline or during the study.
Safety
There were 93 adverse events. The researchers said all events were of mild or moderate intensity. One patient discontinued ACE910 due to mild injection-site redness.
There were no thromboembolic events, even when ACE910 was given concomitantly with factor VIII products or bypassing agents as episodic treatment for breakthrough bleeds.
Three patients developed anti-ACE910 antibodies, but they did not affect ACE910 pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics.
Genentech is planning to initiate a phase 3 trial of ACE910 in patients with hemophilia A and factor VIII inhibitors by the end of 2015, a phase 3 trial in patients without inhibitors in 2016, and a trial in pediatric patients with hemophilia A in 2016.