User login
Management of acute atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in non-pregnant hospitalized adults.
Major Recommendations Note from the University of Michigan Health System (UMHS) and the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC): The following guidance was current as of May 2014. Because UMHS occasionally releases minor revisions to its guidance based on new information, users may wish to consult the original guideline document Note from NGC: The following key points summarize the content of the guideline. Refer to the full text of the original guideline document for detailed information on each of the screening procedures. The strength of recommendation (I-III) and levels of evidence (A-D) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field. Key Points Clinical Presentation Patients presenting with palpitations, irregular pulse, chest pain, dyspnea, fatigue, lightheadedness, syncope, cardio-embolic disease and new or recurrent heart failure should be evaluated for atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL). While AF may be asymptomatic and found incidentally, AFL is usually highly symptomatic. Diagnosis Electrocardiogram (ECG) is essential in the diagnosis of AF/AFL. The initial evaluation is summarized in Table 1 in the original guideline document and should include:
Treatment Initial treatment of AF/AFL depends on hemodynamic stability. Unstable AF/AFL (refer to Figure 1 in the original guideline document):
Stable AF/AFL (refer to Figure 2 in the original guideline document):
Definitions: Levels of Evidence
Strength of Recommendation
Clinical Algorithm(s) The following algorithms are provided in the original guideline document:
An algorithm titled "Management of acute atrial fibrillation/flutter after thoracic surgery" is also provided in Appendix C in the original guideline document. |
Evidence Supporting the Recommendations Type of Evidence Supporting the Recommendations The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for selected recommendations (see the "Major Recommendations" field). Conclusions were based on prospective randomized clinical trials (RCTs) if available, to the exclusion of other data; if RCTs were not available, observational studies were admitted to consideration. If no such data were available for a given link in the problem formulation, expert opinion was used to estimate effect size. |
Benefits/Harms of Implementing the Guideline Recommendations Potential Benefits It is hoped that standardization of care will result in improved patient outcomes, shorter length of hospital stay, lower readmission rates, and overall cost savings for the system. Potential Harms
Refer to Table 4 and Appendices A and B in the original guideline document for more information on specific drugs. |
Major Recommendations Note from the University of Michigan Health System (UMHS) and the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC): The following guidance was current as of May 2014. Because UMHS occasionally releases minor revisions to its guidance based on new information, users may wish to consult the original guideline document Note from NGC: The following key points summarize the content of the guideline. Refer to the full text of the original guideline document for detailed information on each of the screening procedures. The strength of recommendation (I-III) and levels of evidence (A-D) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field. Key Points Clinical Presentation Patients presenting with palpitations, irregular pulse, chest pain, dyspnea, fatigue, lightheadedness, syncope, cardio-embolic disease and new or recurrent heart failure should be evaluated for atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL). While AF may be asymptomatic and found incidentally, AFL is usually highly symptomatic. Diagnosis Electrocardiogram (ECG) is essential in the diagnosis of AF/AFL. The initial evaluation is summarized in Table 1 in the original guideline document and should include:
Treatment Initial treatment of AF/AFL depends on hemodynamic stability. Unstable AF/AFL (refer to Figure 1 in the original guideline document):
Stable AF/AFL (refer to Figure 2 in the original guideline document):
Definitions: Levels of Evidence
Strength of Recommendation
Clinical Algorithm(s) The following algorithms are provided in the original guideline document:
An algorithm titled "Management of acute atrial fibrillation/flutter after thoracic surgery" is also provided in Appendix C in the original guideline document. |
Evidence Supporting the Recommendations Type of Evidence Supporting the Recommendations The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for selected recommendations (see the "Major Recommendations" field). Conclusions were based on prospective randomized clinical trials (RCTs) if available, to the exclusion of other data; if RCTs were not available, observational studies were admitted to consideration. If no such data were available for a given link in the problem formulation, expert opinion was used to estimate effect size. |
Benefits/Harms of Implementing the Guideline Recommendations Potential Benefits It is hoped that standardization of care will result in improved patient outcomes, shorter length of hospital stay, lower readmission rates, and overall cost savings for the system. Potential Harms
Refer to Table 4 and Appendices A and B in the original guideline document for more information on specific drugs. |
Major Recommendations Note from the University of Michigan Health System (UMHS) and the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC): The following guidance was current as of May 2014. Because UMHS occasionally releases minor revisions to its guidance based on new information, users may wish to consult the original guideline document Note from NGC: The following key points summarize the content of the guideline. Refer to the full text of the original guideline document for detailed information on each of the screening procedures. The strength of recommendation (I-III) and levels of evidence (A-D) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field. Key Points Clinical Presentation Patients presenting with palpitations, irregular pulse, chest pain, dyspnea, fatigue, lightheadedness, syncope, cardio-embolic disease and new or recurrent heart failure should be evaluated for atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL). While AF may be asymptomatic and found incidentally, AFL is usually highly symptomatic. Diagnosis Electrocardiogram (ECG) is essential in the diagnosis of AF/AFL. The initial evaluation is summarized in Table 1 in the original guideline document and should include:
Treatment Initial treatment of AF/AFL depends on hemodynamic stability. Unstable AF/AFL (refer to Figure 1 in the original guideline document):
Stable AF/AFL (refer to Figure 2 in the original guideline document):
Definitions: Levels of Evidence
Strength of Recommendation
Clinical Algorithm(s) The following algorithms are provided in the original guideline document:
An algorithm titled "Management of acute atrial fibrillation/flutter after thoracic surgery" is also provided in Appendix C in the original guideline document. |
Evidence Supporting the Recommendations Type of Evidence Supporting the Recommendations The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for selected recommendations (see the "Major Recommendations" field). Conclusions were based on prospective randomized clinical trials (RCTs) if available, to the exclusion of other data; if RCTs were not available, observational studies were admitted to consideration. If no such data were available for a given link in the problem formulation, expert opinion was used to estimate effect size. |
Benefits/Harms of Implementing the Guideline Recommendations Potential Benefits It is hoped that standardization of care will result in improved patient outcomes, shorter length of hospital stay, lower readmission rates, and overall cost savings for the system. Potential Harms
Refer to Table 4 and Appendices A and B in the original guideline document for more information on specific drugs. |
OBJECTIVE: To provide an evidence-based blue print for the acute care of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) at the University of Michigan Health System and to assure consistent care delivery for patients with AF across the inpatient services.
Guidelines are copyright © 2014 University of Michigan Health System. All rights reserved. The summary is provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.