Affiliations
Department of Hospital Medicine, Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
Given name(s)
Moises
Family name
Auron
Degrees
MD, FAAP, FACP

What Is the Best Management of Hereditary Angioedema?

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 09/14/2018 - 12:18
Display Headline
What Is the Best Management of Hereditary Angioedema?

click for large version
Figure 1. How C1 inhibitor regulates bradykinin production2

KEY POINTS

  • Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is an autosomal dominant condition characterized by intermittent mucocutaneous swelling episodes. Severe presentations of HAE can be lethal and require prompt treatment.
  • HAE is generally unresponsive to conventional treatment used for other causes of angioedema (e.g. food or drug reactions), including glucocorticoids, antihistamines, and epinephrine.
  • The pharmacologic treatment of HAE, including acute treatment as well as short- and long-term prophylaxis, currently includes several forms of C1 inhibitor (C1INH) protein replacement (e.g. Cinryze, Berinert), a bradykinin antagonist (Icatibant), and a kallikrein inhibitor (ecallantide [Kalbitor]).

ADDITIONAL READING

  • Bernstein JA. Update on angioedema: evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011; 32(6):408-412.
  • Riedl MA. Update on the acute treatment of hereditary angioedema. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011; 32(1):11-16.

Case

A 36-year-old man with a known history of hereditary angioedema (HAE) presents with severe orofacial swelling and laryngeal angioedema, requiring expectant management, including endotracheal intubation. His previous angioedema (AE) episodes involved his hands, feet, and genitalia; episodes generally occurred after physical trauma. Ten years prior to admission, he had an episode of secondary small bowel obstruction. The patient had been prescribed prophylactic danazol (Danacrine) 100 mg BID but he had gradually been reducing the dosage due to mood changes; at the time of presentation, he had already tapered to 100 mg danazol three times per week (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday).

Overview

HAE is an autosomal dominant condition characterized by localized, episodic swelling of the deeper dermal layers and/or mucosal tissue. Its acute presentation can vary in severity; presentations can be lethal.

HAE is generally unresponsive to conventional treatments used for other causes of AE (e.g. food or drug reactions) including glucocorticoids, antihistamines, and epinephrine. The pharmacologic treatment of acute attacks, as well as for short- and long-term prophylaxis of HAE, has evolved significantly in recent years and now includes several forms of C1 inhibitor (C1INH) protein replacement, as well as a bradykinin antagonist, and a kallikrein inhibitor.

Review of the Data

Epidemiology. HAE is an autosomal dominant disease with prevalence in the U.S. of 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 50,000 patients. All ethnic groups are equally affected, with no gender predilection. In most cases, a positive family history is present; however, in 25% of cases, spontaneous mutations occur such that an unremarkable family history does not rule out the diagnosis.1

Pathophysiology. In the past decade, there has been substantial advancement in our understanding of HAE pathophysiology. HAE occurs as a result of functional or quantitative C1 esterase inhibitor (C1INH) deficiency.

C1INH belongs to a group of proteins known as serpins (serine protease inhibitors). The C1INH gene is located on chromosome 11, and has several polymorphic sites, which predispose to spontaneous mutations.1

Bradykinin is the core bioactive mediator, which causes vasodilation, smooth muscle contraction, and subsequent edema.1 C1INH regulates bradykinin production by blocking kallikrein’s conversion of factor XII into XIIa, prekallikrein to kallikrein, and cleavage of high-molecular-weight kininogen by activated kallikrein to form bradykinin (see Figure 1).1,2

click for large version
Figure 1. How C1 inhibitor regulates bradykinin production2

Clinical Manifestations

HAE is characterized by recurrent episodes of swelling, the frequency and severity of which are quite variable. Virtually all HAE patients have abdominal- and extremity-swelling episodes, and 50% will have episodes of laryngeal swelling; other involved areas might include the face, oropharynx, and genitalia.4 These episodes are usually unilateral; edema is nonpruritic, nonpitting, and often painless. Episodes involving the oropharynx, larynx, and abdomen can be associated with potentially serious morbidity and mortality.1, 3

 

 

HAE episodes usually commence during late childhood and early puberty (on average at age 11). Approximately half of HAE patients will have oropharyngeal involvement that might occur many years, even decades, after the initial onset of the disease. The annual rate of severe, life-threatening laryngeal edema was 0.9% in a recent retrospective study.4

Severity of the disease is variable. Attacks are episodic, and occur on average every 10 to 20 days in untreated patients. These attacks typically peak over 24 hours, then usually resolve after 48 to 72 hours. However, the complete resolution of signs and symptoms can last for up to one week after the attacks.5

There is no concomitant pruritus or urticaria that accompanies the AE. However, erythema marginatum, an evanescent nonpruritic rash with serpiginous borders involving the trunk and inner surface of extremities but sparing the face, might herald the onset of an episode. This rash usually has central pallor that blanches with pressure and worsens with heat.

HAE can be triggered by stressful events, including trauma, surgery, menstruation, and viral infections. However, in many instances, HAE attacks occur without an identifiable cause.5

Differential Diagnosis from Other Causes of Angioedema

Type I HAE is characterized by a quantitative C1INH deficiency (which is functionally abnormal as well), and occurs in 85% of patients. Type II HAE occurs in 15% of patients, and results from a functionally abnormal C1INH.

In patients with Type I and II HAE, as well as acquired C1 inhibitor deficiency (ACID), C4 levels are low during and between attacks. C2 levels are also low during acute attacks. In ACID, levels of C1q are also reduced; these patients require further workup to rule out an undiagnosed malignancy or an autoimmune process. In contrast, patients with ACE-induced, idiopathic, and allergic AE have normal complement profiles.3,6

Type III is a more recently described type of HAE that is rare, not well understood, and generally affects women.3,6 Clinically, it resembles Type I and Type II HAE but complement levels, including C1 inhibitor, are normal (see Table 1).

click for large version
Table 1. Diagnostic laboratory studies to differentiate the types of angioedema6,7

click for large version
Table 2. FDA-approved available treatments for hereditary angioedema2,20

Treatment

HAE types I, II, III, and ACID are generally unresponsive to glucocorticoids, antihistamines, and epinephrine. These forms of AE may be exacerbated by exogenous estrogen.1,8 For this reason, HAE patients should avoid oral hormonal contraception and estrogen replacement therapy. In addition, ACE inhibitors should also be avoided based on their effect on bradykinin degradation.

Until the introduction of newer therapeutic choices, as noted in our case, the treatment of acute attacks of AE was essentially supportive. Patients with impending laryngeal obstruction were managed with intubation prior to progression of the AE to limit airway patency. Prior to the modern era, a substantial proportion of HAE patients died of asphyxiation.

Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) has been used to treat acute HAE attacks, but given its content of contact system proteins (in addition to C1INH), FFP might also pose a risk for worsening of HAE; for this reason, it must be given cautiously to patients who are symptomatic.9

In the past decade, there has been significant progress in the available treatments for HAE. Currently in the U.S., there are several agents recently approved by, or have pending approvals from, the FDA, including several forms of C1INH replacement, a bradykinin antagonist, and a kallikrein inhibitor.

The C1 esterase inhibitor (human) drugs are administered intravenously; both have been shown to be efficacious and safe. Nanofiltered C1 inhibitor provided relief in a median time of two hours when used acutely; when used as prophylaxis, it decreased the number of attacks in a three-month period by 50% (six vs. 12 with placebo, P<0.001).11

 

 

The other C1INH is rhucin, still not approved in U.S. This drug is characterized by a short half-life (approximately two to four hours) compared with the plasma-derived C1INH agents (24 to 48 hours). It is contraindicated in patients with rabbit hypersensitivity, as it is purified from rabbit breast milk.10

Ecallantide is a kallikrein inhibitor for acute therapy that is administered via three subcutaneous injections. This agent has been linked to allergic/anaphylactic reactions in a minority of patients (approximately 4%); therefore, it should be administered cautiously, by a health-care provider, and in a setting where anaphylaxis can be successfully managed.12 Icatibant is a bradykinin antagonist recently approved in the U.S. and administered SC via a single injection.10

In light of the development of these new agents, there is a need for updated guidelines for the long- and short-term prophylaxis and acute management of HAE. A recent guideline focused on the management of HAE in gynecologic and obstetric patients recommended the use of plasma-derived C1INH C1 esterase inhibitor (human) (Cinryze) for short- and long-term prophylaxis and acute treatment of HAE.13 The effect of pregnancy on HAE is variable: Some women worsen and other women have less swelling during their pregnancy. Swelling at the time of parturition is rare; however, the risk rises during the post-partum period.

Type III HAE. An additional form of HAE has been recognized with a pattern of AE episodes that mimics Type I or Type II HAE but with unremarkable laboratory studies of the complement cascade, including C1 inhibitor level and function. At this time, there is no laboratory test with which a diagnosis of Type III HAE can be confirmed. The diagnosis should be suspected in patients with a strong family history of AE reflecting autosomal dominant inheritance. In some, but not all, cases, the condition is manifest in association with high estrogen levels (e.g. pregnancy or administration of oral contraceptives). Type III HAE patients have a salutary response to the same agents that are efficacious for Type I and II HAE.

Acquired C1 inhibitor deficiency (ACID). ACID generally occurs in adults and is clinically indistinguishable from HAE. ACID is not associated with a remarkable family history of AE. In contrast to HAE, this is a consumptive deficiency of C1 inhibitor and results from enhanced catabolism that exceeds the capacity for regenerating C1 inhibitor protein. It is often associated with neoplastic (usually lymphoproliferative) or autoimmune disorders; treatment of the underlying condition frequently leads to improvement in ACID. Although its management is similar to HAE, it tends to be more responsive to anti-fibrinolytics. A salutary response to C1INH replacement therapy might not occur in patients with autoantibodies to C1 inhibitor, but efficacy of ecallantide and icatibant for the treatment of acquired AE has been reported.14, 15

ACEI angioedema. Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) has been associated with recurrent AE without urticaria in 0.1 to 0.7% of patients exposed to these drugs.16 Angioedema from ACE-I more frequently occurs within the first few months of therapy, but it might occur even after years of continuous therapy. ACEI-induced AE is secondary to impaired degradation of bradykinin. The main treatment is to discontinue the offending agent and avoid all other ACE-I, as this is a class-specific reaction.17

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have been associated less commonly with AE. The mechanism for ARB-associated AE has not been elucidated. A meta-analysis showed that in 2% to 17% of patients who were switched to ARBs, recurrence of AE was observed.18 From the pooling of these data with two randomized controlled trials, it is estimated that approximately 10% or less of patients with ACEI-associated AE who switched to ARBs will develop AE.19 In the majority of cases, patients can be switched to ARBs with no recurrence of AE; however, the decision to prescribe an ARB to a patient who has had AE while receiving ACEI should be made carefully on an individualized risk/benefit basis.19

 

 

Preventive Treatment

The 17 α-alkylated androgens that can be used for treatment of HAE are danazol (Danacrine), stanozolol (Winstrol), oxandralone (Oxandrine) and methyltestosterone (Android). In patients with HAE, attenuated androgens can significantly reduce the frequency and severity of attacks; however, their use is limited by risk for untoward effects (virilization, abnormal liver function tests, change in libido, anxiety, etc.).21 There is also a risk for hepatotoxicity, including development of hepatic adenomas and hepatic carcinoma.

Antifibrinolytics also may have efficacy for HAE, but these agents have been associated with a variety of adverse effects, including nausea and diarrhea, postural hypotension, fatigue, enhanced thrombosis, retinal changes, and teratogenicity.8, 22, 23

In 2009, long-term prophylaxis with C1-INH concentrate was recommended for patients with HAE with frequent or disabling attacks, a history of laryngeal attacks, and poor quality of life. The 2007 International Consensus Algorithm for the Diagnosis, Therapy, and Management of HAE recommended long-term prophylaxis in patients with more than one monthly severe HAE attack, more than five days of disability per month, or any history of airway compromise.24, 25

The decision to prescribe long-term prophylaxis, and the dose/frequency of medication required, should be individualized based on clinical parameters, such as frequency and severity of attacks, and not on C1 INH or C4 levels.

Perioperative Considerations

It is well established that any trauma, including dental procedures or surgery, can precipitate HAE attacks. For this reason, short-term prophylactic treatment in HAE patients undergoing procedures is recommended. Ideally, avoiding endotracheal intubation is the best approach; however, if intubation cannot be avoided, then adequate prophylaxis should be administered.2

Attenuated androgens can be given up to seven days before a procedure, or C1 INH can be administered 24 hours in advance. If C1 INH is unavailable, FFP can be given six to 12 hours in advance in patients who are not symptomatic; in case of endotracheal intubation, either FFP or C1 INH should be administered immediately before.2

Several case reports in multiple specialty surgical patients (abdominal surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass, orthopedic surgery, etc.) have confirmed the successful use of C1 INH in the prevention of acute attacks with favorable outcomes.2

There is no need to follow C1 INH levels, as it has no clinical relevance.

Back to the Case

The patient was admitted to the ICU and received a total of eight units of FFP. He was transferred to our institution and was able to be extubated three days after initial presentation. Laboratory studies revealed C4 10mg/dL and C1 esterase inhibitor 10mg/dL (both low).

Danazol was resumed. However, within several months after discharge, Cinryze became available in the U.S. market and was eventually prescribed. The patient has not had further significant attacks requiring inpatient management.


Dr. Auron is an assistant professor of medicine and pediatrics at the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University. Dr. Lang is co-director of the Asthma Center and director of the Allergy/Immunology Fellowship Training Program at the Cleveland Clinic.

C1INH protein replacement10

  • Plasma-derived C1INH nanofiltered C1 esterase inhibitor (human) (Cinryze): IV use for prophylaxis and acute treatment.
  • Plasma-derived C1INH pasteurized C1 esterase inhibitor (human) (Berinert): IV use for acute therapy.
  • Recombinant C1INH rhucin (Ruconest)–not available in the U.S.

Bradykinin antagonist and kallikrein inhibitors10

  • Ecallantide (Kalbitor): selective recombinant plasma kallikrein inhibitor; subcutaneous (SC) use for acute therapy.
  • Icatibant (Firazyr): second-generation specific bradykinin 2 receptor antagonist; SC use for acute therapy.

References

  1. Bernstein, JA. Update on angioedema: evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011;32(6):408-412.
  2. Levy JH, Freiberger DJ, Roback J. Hereditary angioedema: current and emerging treatment options. Anesth Analg. 2010;110(5):1271-1280.
  3. Busse PJ. Angioedema: Differential diagnosis and treatment. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011;32:Suppl 1:S3-S11.
  4. Khan DA. Hereditary angioedema: historical aspects, classification, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and laboratory diagnosis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011;32(1):1-10.
  5. Bork K, Meng G, Staubach P, Hardt, J. Hereditary angioedema: new findings concerning symptoms, affected organs, and course. Am J Med. 2006;119(3):267-274.
  6. Zuraw BL, Christiansen SC. Pathogenesis and laboratory diagnosis of hereditary angioedema. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2009;30:487-492.
  7. Frazer-Abel A, Giclas PC. Update on laboratory tests for the diagnosis and differentiation of hereditary angioedema and acquired angioedema. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011;32:Suppl 1:S17-S21.
  8. Banerjee A. Current treatment of hereditary angioedema: an update on clinical studies. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2010;31:398-406.
  9. Donaldson VH. Therapy of "the neurotic edema." N Engl J Med. 1972;286(15):835-836.
  10. Riedl MA. Update on the acute treatment of hereditary angioedema. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011;32:11-16.
  11. Zuraw BL, Busse PJ, White M, et al. Nanofiltered C1 inhibitor concentrate for treatment of hereditary angioedema. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:513-522.
  12. Cicardi M, Levy RJ, McNeil DL. Ecallantide for the treatment of acute attacks in hereditary angioedema. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:523-531.
  13. Caballero T, Farkas H, Bouillet L, et al. International consensus and practical guidelines on the gynecologic and obstetric management of female patients with hereditary angioedema caused by C1 inhibitor deficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129(2):308-320.
  14. Cicardi M, Zanichelli A. Acquired angioedema. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;6(1):14.
  15. Zanichelli A, Badini M, Nataloni I, Montano N, Cicardi M. Treatment of acquired angioedema with icatibant: a case report. Intern Emerg Med. 2011;6(3):279-280.
  16. Byrd JB, Adam A, Brown NJ. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-associated angioedema. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2006;26(4):725-737.
  17. Haymore BR, Yoon J, Mikita CP, Klote MM, DeZee KJ. Risk of angioedema with angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with prior angioedema associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a meta-analysis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;101(5):495-499.
  18. Beavers CJ, Dunn SP, Macaulay TE. The role of angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema. Ann Pharmacother. 2011;45(4):520-524.
  19. Nzeako UC. Diagnosis and management of angioedema with abdominal involvement: a gastroenterology perspective. World J Gastroenterol. 2010; 16(39):4913-4921.
  20. Banerji A, Sloane DE, Sheffer AL. Hereditary angioedema: a current state-of-the-art review, V: attenuated androgens for the treatment of hereditary angioedema. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;100(1) (Suppl 2):S19-22.
  21. Zuraw BL. Clinical practice. Hereditary angioedema. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(10):1027-1036.
  22. Zuraw BL. Hereditary angioedema: a current state-of-the-art review, IV: short- and long-term treatment of hereditary angioedema: out with the old and in with the new? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;100(1) (Suppl 2):S13-S18.
  23. Bowen T, Cicardi M, Bork K, et al. Hereditary angioedema: a current state-of-the-art review, VII: Canadian Hungarian 2007 International Consensus Algorithm for the Diagnosis, Therapy, and Management of Hereditary Angioedema. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;100(1)(Suppl 2):S30-40.
  24. Craig T, Riedl M, Dykewicz M, et al. When is prophylaxis for hereditary angioedema necessary? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2009.102(5):366-372.
  25. Frank MM. Update on preventive therapy (prophylaxis) of hereditary angioedema. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011;32(1):17-21.
Issue
The Hospitalist - 2013(06)
Publications
Sections

click for large version
Figure 1. How C1 inhibitor regulates bradykinin production2

KEY POINTS

  • Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is an autosomal dominant condition characterized by intermittent mucocutaneous swelling episodes. Severe presentations of HAE can be lethal and require prompt treatment.
  • HAE is generally unresponsive to conventional treatment used for other causes of angioedema (e.g. food or drug reactions), including glucocorticoids, antihistamines, and epinephrine.
  • The pharmacologic treatment of HAE, including acute treatment as well as short- and long-term prophylaxis, currently includes several forms of C1 inhibitor (C1INH) protein replacement (e.g. Cinryze, Berinert), a bradykinin antagonist (Icatibant), and a kallikrein inhibitor (ecallantide [Kalbitor]).

ADDITIONAL READING

  • Bernstein JA. Update on angioedema: evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011; 32(6):408-412.
  • Riedl MA. Update on the acute treatment of hereditary angioedema. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011; 32(1):11-16.

Case

A 36-year-old man with a known history of hereditary angioedema (HAE) presents with severe orofacial swelling and laryngeal angioedema, requiring expectant management, including endotracheal intubation. His previous angioedema (AE) episodes involved his hands, feet, and genitalia; episodes generally occurred after physical trauma. Ten years prior to admission, he had an episode of secondary small bowel obstruction. The patient had been prescribed prophylactic danazol (Danacrine) 100 mg BID but he had gradually been reducing the dosage due to mood changes; at the time of presentation, he had already tapered to 100 mg danazol three times per week (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday).

Overview

HAE is an autosomal dominant condition characterized by localized, episodic swelling of the deeper dermal layers and/or mucosal tissue. Its acute presentation can vary in severity; presentations can be lethal.

HAE is generally unresponsive to conventional treatments used for other causes of AE (e.g. food or drug reactions) including glucocorticoids, antihistamines, and epinephrine. The pharmacologic treatment of acute attacks, as well as for short- and long-term prophylaxis of HAE, has evolved significantly in recent years and now includes several forms of C1 inhibitor (C1INH) protein replacement, as well as a bradykinin antagonist, and a kallikrein inhibitor.

Review of the Data

Epidemiology. HAE is an autosomal dominant disease with prevalence in the U.S. of 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 50,000 patients. All ethnic groups are equally affected, with no gender predilection. In most cases, a positive family history is present; however, in 25% of cases, spontaneous mutations occur such that an unremarkable family history does not rule out the diagnosis.1

Pathophysiology. In the past decade, there has been substantial advancement in our understanding of HAE pathophysiology. HAE occurs as a result of functional or quantitative C1 esterase inhibitor (C1INH) deficiency.

C1INH belongs to a group of proteins known as serpins (serine protease inhibitors). The C1INH gene is located on chromosome 11, and has several polymorphic sites, which predispose to spontaneous mutations.1

Bradykinin is the core bioactive mediator, which causes vasodilation, smooth muscle contraction, and subsequent edema.1 C1INH regulates bradykinin production by blocking kallikrein’s conversion of factor XII into XIIa, prekallikrein to kallikrein, and cleavage of high-molecular-weight kininogen by activated kallikrein to form bradykinin (see Figure 1).1,2

click for large version
Figure 1. How C1 inhibitor regulates bradykinin production2

Clinical Manifestations

HAE is characterized by recurrent episodes of swelling, the frequency and severity of which are quite variable. Virtually all HAE patients have abdominal- and extremity-swelling episodes, and 50% will have episodes of laryngeal swelling; other involved areas might include the face, oropharynx, and genitalia.4 These episodes are usually unilateral; edema is nonpruritic, nonpitting, and often painless. Episodes involving the oropharynx, larynx, and abdomen can be associated with potentially serious morbidity and mortality.1, 3

 

 

HAE episodes usually commence during late childhood and early puberty (on average at age 11). Approximately half of HAE patients will have oropharyngeal involvement that might occur many years, even decades, after the initial onset of the disease. The annual rate of severe, life-threatening laryngeal edema was 0.9% in a recent retrospective study.4

Severity of the disease is variable. Attacks are episodic, and occur on average every 10 to 20 days in untreated patients. These attacks typically peak over 24 hours, then usually resolve after 48 to 72 hours. However, the complete resolution of signs and symptoms can last for up to one week after the attacks.5

There is no concomitant pruritus or urticaria that accompanies the AE. However, erythema marginatum, an evanescent nonpruritic rash with serpiginous borders involving the trunk and inner surface of extremities but sparing the face, might herald the onset of an episode. This rash usually has central pallor that blanches with pressure and worsens with heat.

HAE can be triggered by stressful events, including trauma, surgery, menstruation, and viral infections. However, in many instances, HAE attacks occur without an identifiable cause.5

Differential Diagnosis from Other Causes of Angioedema

Type I HAE is characterized by a quantitative C1INH deficiency (which is functionally abnormal as well), and occurs in 85% of patients. Type II HAE occurs in 15% of patients, and results from a functionally abnormal C1INH.

In patients with Type I and II HAE, as well as acquired C1 inhibitor deficiency (ACID), C4 levels are low during and between attacks. C2 levels are also low during acute attacks. In ACID, levels of C1q are also reduced; these patients require further workup to rule out an undiagnosed malignancy or an autoimmune process. In contrast, patients with ACE-induced, idiopathic, and allergic AE have normal complement profiles.3,6

Type III is a more recently described type of HAE that is rare, not well understood, and generally affects women.3,6 Clinically, it resembles Type I and Type II HAE but complement levels, including C1 inhibitor, are normal (see Table 1).

click for large version
Table 1. Diagnostic laboratory studies to differentiate the types of angioedema6,7

click for large version
Table 2. FDA-approved available treatments for hereditary angioedema2,20

Treatment

HAE types I, II, III, and ACID are generally unresponsive to glucocorticoids, antihistamines, and epinephrine. These forms of AE may be exacerbated by exogenous estrogen.1,8 For this reason, HAE patients should avoid oral hormonal contraception and estrogen replacement therapy. In addition, ACE inhibitors should also be avoided based on their effect on bradykinin degradation.

Until the introduction of newer therapeutic choices, as noted in our case, the treatment of acute attacks of AE was essentially supportive. Patients with impending laryngeal obstruction were managed with intubation prior to progression of the AE to limit airway patency. Prior to the modern era, a substantial proportion of HAE patients died of asphyxiation.

Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) has been used to treat acute HAE attacks, but given its content of contact system proteins (in addition to C1INH), FFP might also pose a risk for worsening of HAE; for this reason, it must be given cautiously to patients who are symptomatic.9

In the past decade, there has been significant progress in the available treatments for HAE. Currently in the U.S., there are several agents recently approved by, or have pending approvals from, the FDA, including several forms of C1INH replacement, a bradykinin antagonist, and a kallikrein inhibitor.

The C1 esterase inhibitor (human) drugs are administered intravenously; both have been shown to be efficacious and safe. Nanofiltered C1 inhibitor provided relief in a median time of two hours when used acutely; when used as prophylaxis, it decreased the number of attacks in a three-month period by 50% (six vs. 12 with placebo, P<0.001).11

 

 

The other C1INH is rhucin, still not approved in U.S. This drug is characterized by a short half-life (approximately two to four hours) compared with the plasma-derived C1INH agents (24 to 48 hours). It is contraindicated in patients with rabbit hypersensitivity, as it is purified from rabbit breast milk.10

Ecallantide is a kallikrein inhibitor for acute therapy that is administered via three subcutaneous injections. This agent has been linked to allergic/anaphylactic reactions in a minority of patients (approximately 4%); therefore, it should be administered cautiously, by a health-care provider, and in a setting where anaphylaxis can be successfully managed.12 Icatibant is a bradykinin antagonist recently approved in the U.S. and administered SC via a single injection.10

In light of the development of these new agents, there is a need for updated guidelines for the long- and short-term prophylaxis and acute management of HAE. A recent guideline focused on the management of HAE in gynecologic and obstetric patients recommended the use of plasma-derived C1INH C1 esterase inhibitor (human) (Cinryze) for short- and long-term prophylaxis and acute treatment of HAE.13 The effect of pregnancy on HAE is variable: Some women worsen and other women have less swelling during their pregnancy. Swelling at the time of parturition is rare; however, the risk rises during the post-partum period.

Type III HAE. An additional form of HAE has been recognized with a pattern of AE episodes that mimics Type I or Type II HAE but with unremarkable laboratory studies of the complement cascade, including C1 inhibitor level and function. At this time, there is no laboratory test with which a diagnosis of Type III HAE can be confirmed. The diagnosis should be suspected in patients with a strong family history of AE reflecting autosomal dominant inheritance. In some, but not all, cases, the condition is manifest in association with high estrogen levels (e.g. pregnancy or administration of oral contraceptives). Type III HAE patients have a salutary response to the same agents that are efficacious for Type I and II HAE.

Acquired C1 inhibitor deficiency (ACID). ACID generally occurs in adults and is clinically indistinguishable from HAE. ACID is not associated with a remarkable family history of AE. In contrast to HAE, this is a consumptive deficiency of C1 inhibitor and results from enhanced catabolism that exceeds the capacity for regenerating C1 inhibitor protein. It is often associated with neoplastic (usually lymphoproliferative) or autoimmune disorders; treatment of the underlying condition frequently leads to improvement in ACID. Although its management is similar to HAE, it tends to be more responsive to anti-fibrinolytics. A salutary response to C1INH replacement therapy might not occur in patients with autoantibodies to C1 inhibitor, but efficacy of ecallantide and icatibant for the treatment of acquired AE has been reported.14, 15

ACEI angioedema. Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) has been associated with recurrent AE without urticaria in 0.1 to 0.7% of patients exposed to these drugs.16 Angioedema from ACE-I more frequently occurs within the first few months of therapy, but it might occur even after years of continuous therapy. ACEI-induced AE is secondary to impaired degradation of bradykinin. The main treatment is to discontinue the offending agent and avoid all other ACE-I, as this is a class-specific reaction.17

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have been associated less commonly with AE. The mechanism for ARB-associated AE has not been elucidated. A meta-analysis showed that in 2% to 17% of patients who were switched to ARBs, recurrence of AE was observed.18 From the pooling of these data with two randomized controlled trials, it is estimated that approximately 10% or less of patients with ACEI-associated AE who switched to ARBs will develop AE.19 In the majority of cases, patients can be switched to ARBs with no recurrence of AE; however, the decision to prescribe an ARB to a patient who has had AE while receiving ACEI should be made carefully on an individualized risk/benefit basis.19

 

 

Preventive Treatment

The 17 α-alkylated androgens that can be used for treatment of HAE are danazol (Danacrine), stanozolol (Winstrol), oxandralone (Oxandrine) and methyltestosterone (Android). In patients with HAE, attenuated androgens can significantly reduce the frequency and severity of attacks; however, their use is limited by risk for untoward effects (virilization, abnormal liver function tests, change in libido, anxiety, etc.).21 There is also a risk for hepatotoxicity, including development of hepatic adenomas and hepatic carcinoma.

Antifibrinolytics also may have efficacy for HAE, but these agents have been associated with a variety of adverse effects, including nausea and diarrhea, postural hypotension, fatigue, enhanced thrombosis, retinal changes, and teratogenicity.8, 22, 23

In 2009, long-term prophylaxis with C1-INH concentrate was recommended for patients with HAE with frequent or disabling attacks, a history of laryngeal attacks, and poor quality of life. The 2007 International Consensus Algorithm for the Diagnosis, Therapy, and Management of HAE recommended long-term prophylaxis in patients with more than one monthly severe HAE attack, more than five days of disability per month, or any history of airway compromise.24, 25

The decision to prescribe long-term prophylaxis, and the dose/frequency of medication required, should be individualized based on clinical parameters, such as frequency and severity of attacks, and not on C1 INH or C4 levels.

Perioperative Considerations

It is well established that any trauma, including dental procedures or surgery, can precipitate HAE attacks. For this reason, short-term prophylactic treatment in HAE patients undergoing procedures is recommended. Ideally, avoiding endotracheal intubation is the best approach; however, if intubation cannot be avoided, then adequate prophylaxis should be administered.2

Attenuated androgens can be given up to seven days before a procedure, or C1 INH can be administered 24 hours in advance. If C1 INH is unavailable, FFP can be given six to 12 hours in advance in patients who are not symptomatic; in case of endotracheal intubation, either FFP or C1 INH should be administered immediately before.2

Several case reports in multiple specialty surgical patients (abdominal surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass, orthopedic surgery, etc.) have confirmed the successful use of C1 INH in the prevention of acute attacks with favorable outcomes.2

There is no need to follow C1 INH levels, as it has no clinical relevance.

Back to the Case

The patient was admitted to the ICU and received a total of eight units of FFP. He was transferred to our institution and was able to be extubated three days after initial presentation. Laboratory studies revealed C4 10mg/dL and C1 esterase inhibitor 10mg/dL (both low).

Danazol was resumed. However, within several months after discharge, Cinryze became available in the U.S. market and was eventually prescribed. The patient has not had further significant attacks requiring inpatient management.


Dr. Auron is an assistant professor of medicine and pediatrics at the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University. Dr. Lang is co-director of the Asthma Center and director of the Allergy/Immunology Fellowship Training Program at the Cleveland Clinic.

C1INH protein replacement10

  • Plasma-derived C1INH nanofiltered C1 esterase inhibitor (human) (Cinryze): IV use for prophylaxis and acute treatment.
  • Plasma-derived C1INH pasteurized C1 esterase inhibitor (human) (Berinert): IV use for acute therapy.
  • Recombinant C1INH rhucin (Ruconest)–not available in the U.S.

Bradykinin antagonist and kallikrein inhibitors10

  • Ecallantide (Kalbitor): selective recombinant plasma kallikrein inhibitor; subcutaneous (SC) use for acute therapy.
  • Icatibant (Firazyr): second-generation specific bradykinin 2 receptor antagonist; SC use for acute therapy.

References

  1. Bernstein, JA. Update on angioedema: evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011;32(6):408-412.
  2. Levy JH, Freiberger DJ, Roback J. Hereditary angioedema: current and emerging treatment options. Anesth Analg. 2010;110(5):1271-1280.
  3. Busse PJ. Angioedema: Differential diagnosis and treatment. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011;32:Suppl 1:S3-S11.
  4. Khan DA. Hereditary angioedema: historical aspects, classification, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and laboratory diagnosis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011;32(1):1-10.
  5. Bork K, Meng G, Staubach P, Hardt, J. Hereditary angioedema: new findings concerning symptoms, affected organs, and course. Am J Med. 2006;119(3):267-274.
  6. Zuraw BL, Christiansen SC. Pathogenesis and laboratory diagnosis of hereditary angioedema. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2009;30:487-492.
  7. Frazer-Abel A, Giclas PC. Update on laboratory tests for the diagnosis and differentiation of hereditary angioedema and acquired angioedema. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011;32:Suppl 1:S17-S21.
  8. Banerjee A. Current treatment of hereditary angioedema: an update on clinical studies. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2010;31:398-406.
  9. Donaldson VH. Therapy of "the neurotic edema." N Engl J Med. 1972;286(15):835-836.
  10. Riedl MA. Update on the acute treatment of hereditary angioedema. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011;32:11-16.
  11. Zuraw BL, Busse PJ, White M, et al. Nanofiltered C1 inhibitor concentrate for treatment of hereditary angioedema. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:513-522.
  12. Cicardi M, Levy RJ, McNeil DL. Ecallantide for the treatment of acute attacks in hereditary angioedema. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:523-531.
  13. Caballero T, Farkas H, Bouillet L, et al. International consensus and practical guidelines on the gynecologic and obstetric management of female patients with hereditary angioedema caused by C1 inhibitor deficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129(2):308-320.
  14. Cicardi M, Zanichelli A. Acquired angioedema. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;6(1):14.
  15. Zanichelli A, Badini M, Nataloni I, Montano N, Cicardi M. Treatment of acquired angioedema with icatibant: a case report. Intern Emerg Med. 2011;6(3):279-280.
  16. Byrd JB, Adam A, Brown NJ. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-associated angioedema. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2006;26(4):725-737.
  17. Haymore BR, Yoon J, Mikita CP, Klote MM, DeZee KJ. Risk of angioedema with angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with prior angioedema associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a meta-analysis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;101(5):495-499.
  18. Beavers CJ, Dunn SP, Macaulay TE. The role of angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema. Ann Pharmacother. 2011;45(4):520-524.
  19. Nzeako UC. Diagnosis and management of angioedema with abdominal involvement: a gastroenterology perspective. World J Gastroenterol. 2010; 16(39):4913-4921.
  20. Banerji A, Sloane DE, Sheffer AL. Hereditary angioedema: a current state-of-the-art review, V: attenuated androgens for the treatment of hereditary angioedema. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;100(1) (Suppl 2):S19-22.
  21. Zuraw BL. Clinical practice. Hereditary angioedema. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(10):1027-1036.
  22. Zuraw BL. Hereditary angioedema: a current state-of-the-art review, IV: short- and long-term treatment of hereditary angioedema: out with the old and in with the new? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;100(1) (Suppl 2):S13-S18.
  23. Bowen T, Cicardi M, Bork K, et al. Hereditary angioedema: a current state-of-the-art review, VII: Canadian Hungarian 2007 International Consensus Algorithm for the Diagnosis, Therapy, and Management of Hereditary Angioedema. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;100(1)(Suppl 2):S30-40.
  24. Craig T, Riedl M, Dykewicz M, et al. When is prophylaxis for hereditary angioedema necessary? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2009.102(5):366-372.
  25. Frank MM. Update on preventive therapy (prophylaxis) of hereditary angioedema. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011;32(1):17-21.

click for large version
Figure 1. How C1 inhibitor regulates bradykinin production2

KEY POINTS

  • Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is an autosomal dominant condition characterized by intermittent mucocutaneous swelling episodes. Severe presentations of HAE can be lethal and require prompt treatment.
  • HAE is generally unresponsive to conventional treatment used for other causes of angioedema (e.g. food or drug reactions), including glucocorticoids, antihistamines, and epinephrine.
  • The pharmacologic treatment of HAE, including acute treatment as well as short- and long-term prophylaxis, currently includes several forms of C1 inhibitor (C1INH) protein replacement (e.g. Cinryze, Berinert), a bradykinin antagonist (Icatibant), and a kallikrein inhibitor (ecallantide [Kalbitor]).

ADDITIONAL READING

  • Bernstein JA. Update on angioedema: evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011; 32(6):408-412.
  • Riedl MA. Update on the acute treatment of hereditary angioedema. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011; 32(1):11-16.

Case

A 36-year-old man with a known history of hereditary angioedema (HAE) presents with severe orofacial swelling and laryngeal angioedema, requiring expectant management, including endotracheal intubation. His previous angioedema (AE) episodes involved his hands, feet, and genitalia; episodes generally occurred after physical trauma. Ten years prior to admission, he had an episode of secondary small bowel obstruction. The patient had been prescribed prophylactic danazol (Danacrine) 100 mg BID but he had gradually been reducing the dosage due to mood changes; at the time of presentation, he had already tapered to 100 mg danazol three times per week (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday).

Overview

HAE is an autosomal dominant condition characterized by localized, episodic swelling of the deeper dermal layers and/or mucosal tissue. Its acute presentation can vary in severity; presentations can be lethal.

HAE is generally unresponsive to conventional treatments used for other causes of AE (e.g. food or drug reactions) including glucocorticoids, antihistamines, and epinephrine. The pharmacologic treatment of acute attacks, as well as for short- and long-term prophylaxis of HAE, has evolved significantly in recent years and now includes several forms of C1 inhibitor (C1INH) protein replacement, as well as a bradykinin antagonist, and a kallikrein inhibitor.

Review of the Data

Epidemiology. HAE is an autosomal dominant disease with prevalence in the U.S. of 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 50,000 patients. All ethnic groups are equally affected, with no gender predilection. In most cases, a positive family history is present; however, in 25% of cases, spontaneous mutations occur such that an unremarkable family history does not rule out the diagnosis.1

Pathophysiology. In the past decade, there has been substantial advancement in our understanding of HAE pathophysiology. HAE occurs as a result of functional or quantitative C1 esterase inhibitor (C1INH) deficiency.

C1INH belongs to a group of proteins known as serpins (serine protease inhibitors). The C1INH gene is located on chromosome 11, and has several polymorphic sites, which predispose to spontaneous mutations.1

Bradykinin is the core bioactive mediator, which causes vasodilation, smooth muscle contraction, and subsequent edema.1 C1INH regulates bradykinin production by blocking kallikrein’s conversion of factor XII into XIIa, prekallikrein to kallikrein, and cleavage of high-molecular-weight kininogen by activated kallikrein to form bradykinin (see Figure 1).1,2

click for large version
Figure 1. How C1 inhibitor regulates bradykinin production2

Clinical Manifestations

HAE is characterized by recurrent episodes of swelling, the frequency and severity of which are quite variable. Virtually all HAE patients have abdominal- and extremity-swelling episodes, and 50% will have episodes of laryngeal swelling; other involved areas might include the face, oropharynx, and genitalia.4 These episodes are usually unilateral; edema is nonpruritic, nonpitting, and often painless. Episodes involving the oropharynx, larynx, and abdomen can be associated with potentially serious morbidity and mortality.1, 3

 

 

HAE episodes usually commence during late childhood and early puberty (on average at age 11). Approximately half of HAE patients will have oropharyngeal involvement that might occur many years, even decades, after the initial onset of the disease. The annual rate of severe, life-threatening laryngeal edema was 0.9% in a recent retrospective study.4

Severity of the disease is variable. Attacks are episodic, and occur on average every 10 to 20 days in untreated patients. These attacks typically peak over 24 hours, then usually resolve after 48 to 72 hours. However, the complete resolution of signs and symptoms can last for up to one week after the attacks.5

There is no concomitant pruritus or urticaria that accompanies the AE. However, erythema marginatum, an evanescent nonpruritic rash with serpiginous borders involving the trunk and inner surface of extremities but sparing the face, might herald the onset of an episode. This rash usually has central pallor that blanches with pressure and worsens with heat.

HAE can be triggered by stressful events, including trauma, surgery, menstruation, and viral infections. However, in many instances, HAE attacks occur without an identifiable cause.5

Differential Diagnosis from Other Causes of Angioedema

Type I HAE is characterized by a quantitative C1INH deficiency (which is functionally abnormal as well), and occurs in 85% of patients. Type II HAE occurs in 15% of patients, and results from a functionally abnormal C1INH.

In patients with Type I and II HAE, as well as acquired C1 inhibitor deficiency (ACID), C4 levels are low during and between attacks. C2 levels are also low during acute attacks. In ACID, levels of C1q are also reduced; these patients require further workup to rule out an undiagnosed malignancy or an autoimmune process. In contrast, patients with ACE-induced, idiopathic, and allergic AE have normal complement profiles.3,6

Type III is a more recently described type of HAE that is rare, not well understood, and generally affects women.3,6 Clinically, it resembles Type I and Type II HAE but complement levels, including C1 inhibitor, are normal (see Table 1).

click for large version
Table 1. Diagnostic laboratory studies to differentiate the types of angioedema6,7

click for large version
Table 2. FDA-approved available treatments for hereditary angioedema2,20

Treatment

HAE types I, II, III, and ACID are generally unresponsive to glucocorticoids, antihistamines, and epinephrine. These forms of AE may be exacerbated by exogenous estrogen.1,8 For this reason, HAE patients should avoid oral hormonal contraception and estrogen replacement therapy. In addition, ACE inhibitors should also be avoided based on their effect on bradykinin degradation.

Until the introduction of newer therapeutic choices, as noted in our case, the treatment of acute attacks of AE was essentially supportive. Patients with impending laryngeal obstruction were managed with intubation prior to progression of the AE to limit airway patency. Prior to the modern era, a substantial proportion of HAE patients died of asphyxiation.

Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) has been used to treat acute HAE attacks, but given its content of contact system proteins (in addition to C1INH), FFP might also pose a risk for worsening of HAE; for this reason, it must be given cautiously to patients who are symptomatic.9

In the past decade, there has been significant progress in the available treatments for HAE. Currently in the U.S., there are several agents recently approved by, or have pending approvals from, the FDA, including several forms of C1INH replacement, a bradykinin antagonist, and a kallikrein inhibitor.

The C1 esterase inhibitor (human) drugs are administered intravenously; both have been shown to be efficacious and safe. Nanofiltered C1 inhibitor provided relief in a median time of two hours when used acutely; when used as prophylaxis, it decreased the number of attacks in a three-month period by 50% (six vs. 12 with placebo, P<0.001).11

 

 

The other C1INH is rhucin, still not approved in U.S. This drug is characterized by a short half-life (approximately two to four hours) compared with the plasma-derived C1INH agents (24 to 48 hours). It is contraindicated in patients with rabbit hypersensitivity, as it is purified from rabbit breast milk.10

Ecallantide is a kallikrein inhibitor for acute therapy that is administered via three subcutaneous injections. This agent has been linked to allergic/anaphylactic reactions in a minority of patients (approximately 4%); therefore, it should be administered cautiously, by a health-care provider, and in a setting where anaphylaxis can be successfully managed.12 Icatibant is a bradykinin antagonist recently approved in the U.S. and administered SC via a single injection.10

In light of the development of these new agents, there is a need for updated guidelines for the long- and short-term prophylaxis and acute management of HAE. A recent guideline focused on the management of HAE in gynecologic and obstetric patients recommended the use of plasma-derived C1INH C1 esterase inhibitor (human) (Cinryze) for short- and long-term prophylaxis and acute treatment of HAE.13 The effect of pregnancy on HAE is variable: Some women worsen and other women have less swelling during their pregnancy. Swelling at the time of parturition is rare; however, the risk rises during the post-partum period.

Type III HAE. An additional form of HAE has been recognized with a pattern of AE episodes that mimics Type I or Type II HAE but with unremarkable laboratory studies of the complement cascade, including C1 inhibitor level and function. At this time, there is no laboratory test with which a diagnosis of Type III HAE can be confirmed. The diagnosis should be suspected in patients with a strong family history of AE reflecting autosomal dominant inheritance. In some, but not all, cases, the condition is manifest in association with high estrogen levels (e.g. pregnancy or administration of oral contraceptives). Type III HAE patients have a salutary response to the same agents that are efficacious for Type I and II HAE.

Acquired C1 inhibitor deficiency (ACID). ACID generally occurs in adults and is clinically indistinguishable from HAE. ACID is not associated with a remarkable family history of AE. In contrast to HAE, this is a consumptive deficiency of C1 inhibitor and results from enhanced catabolism that exceeds the capacity for regenerating C1 inhibitor protein. It is often associated with neoplastic (usually lymphoproliferative) or autoimmune disorders; treatment of the underlying condition frequently leads to improvement in ACID. Although its management is similar to HAE, it tends to be more responsive to anti-fibrinolytics. A salutary response to C1INH replacement therapy might not occur in patients with autoantibodies to C1 inhibitor, but efficacy of ecallantide and icatibant for the treatment of acquired AE has been reported.14, 15

ACEI angioedema. Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) has been associated with recurrent AE without urticaria in 0.1 to 0.7% of patients exposed to these drugs.16 Angioedema from ACE-I more frequently occurs within the first few months of therapy, but it might occur even after years of continuous therapy. ACEI-induced AE is secondary to impaired degradation of bradykinin. The main treatment is to discontinue the offending agent and avoid all other ACE-I, as this is a class-specific reaction.17

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have been associated less commonly with AE. The mechanism for ARB-associated AE has not been elucidated. A meta-analysis showed that in 2% to 17% of patients who were switched to ARBs, recurrence of AE was observed.18 From the pooling of these data with two randomized controlled trials, it is estimated that approximately 10% or less of patients with ACEI-associated AE who switched to ARBs will develop AE.19 In the majority of cases, patients can be switched to ARBs with no recurrence of AE; however, the decision to prescribe an ARB to a patient who has had AE while receiving ACEI should be made carefully on an individualized risk/benefit basis.19

 

 

Preventive Treatment

The 17 α-alkylated androgens that can be used for treatment of HAE are danazol (Danacrine), stanozolol (Winstrol), oxandralone (Oxandrine) and methyltestosterone (Android). In patients with HAE, attenuated androgens can significantly reduce the frequency and severity of attacks; however, their use is limited by risk for untoward effects (virilization, abnormal liver function tests, change in libido, anxiety, etc.).21 There is also a risk for hepatotoxicity, including development of hepatic adenomas and hepatic carcinoma.

Antifibrinolytics also may have efficacy for HAE, but these agents have been associated with a variety of adverse effects, including nausea and diarrhea, postural hypotension, fatigue, enhanced thrombosis, retinal changes, and teratogenicity.8, 22, 23

In 2009, long-term prophylaxis with C1-INH concentrate was recommended for patients with HAE with frequent or disabling attacks, a history of laryngeal attacks, and poor quality of life. The 2007 International Consensus Algorithm for the Diagnosis, Therapy, and Management of HAE recommended long-term prophylaxis in patients with more than one monthly severe HAE attack, more than five days of disability per month, or any history of airway compromise.24, 25

The decision to prescribe long-term prophylaxis, and the dose/frequency of medication required, should be individualized based on clinical parameters, such as frequency and severity of attacks, and not on C1 INH or C4 levels.

Perioperative Considerations

It is well established that any trauma, including dental procedures or surgery, can precipitate HAE attacks. For this reason, short-term prophylactic treatment in HAE patients undergoing procedures is recommended. Ideally, avoiding endotracheal intubation is the best approach; however, if intubation cannot be avoided, then adequate prophylaxis should be administered.2

Attenuated androgens can be given up to seven days before a procedure, or C1 INH can be administered 24 hours in advance. If C1 INH is unavailable, FFP can be given six to 12 hours in advance in patients who are not symptomatic; in case of endotracheal intubation, either FFP or C1 INH should be administered immediately before.2

Several case reports in multiple specialty surgical patients (abdominal surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass, orthopedic surgery, etc.) have confirmed the successful use of C1 INH in the prevention of acute attacks with favorable outcomes.2

There is no need to follow C1 INH levels, as it has no clinical relevance.

Back to the Case

The patient was admitted to the ICU and received a total of eight units of FFP. He was transferred to our institution and was able to be extubated three days after initial presentation. Laboratory studies revealed C4 10mg/dL and C1 esterase inhibitor 10mg/dL (both low).

Danazol was resumed. However, within several months after discharge, Cinryze became available in the U.S. market and was eventually prescribed. The patient has not had further significant attacks requiring inpatient management.


Dr. Auron is an assistant professor of medicine and pediatrics at the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University. Dr. Lang is co-director of the Asthma Center and director of the Allergy/Immunology Fellowship Training Program at the Cleveland Clinic.

C1INH protein replacement10

  • Plasma-derived C1INH nanofiltered C1 esterase inhibitor (human) (Cinryze): IV use for prophylaxis and acute treatment.
  • Plasma-derived C1INH pasteurized C1 esterase inhibitor (human) (Berinert): IV use for acute therapy.
  • Recombinant C1INH rhucin (Ruconest)–not available in the U.S.

Bradykinin antagonist and kallikrein inhibitors10

  • Ecallantide (Kalbitor): selective recombinant plasma kallikrein inhibitor; subcutaneous (SC) use for acute therapy.
  • Icatibant (Firazyr): second-generation specific bradykinin 2 receptor antagonist; SC use for acute therapy.

References

  1. Bernstein, JA. Update on angioedema: evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011;32(6):408-412.
  2. Levy JH, Freiberger DJ, Roback J. Hereditary angioedema: current and emerging treatment options. Anesth Analg. 2010;110(5):1271-1280.
  3. Busse PJ. Angioedema: Differential diagnosis and treatment. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011;32:Suppl 1:S3-S11.
  4. Khan DA. Hereditary angioedema: historical aspects, classification, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and laboratory diagnosis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011;32(1):1-10.
  5. Bork K, Meng G, Staubach P, Hardt, J. Hereditary angioedema: new findings concerning symptoms, affected organs, and course. Am J Med. 2006;119(3):267-274.
  6. Zuraw BL, Christiansen SC. Pathogenesis and laboratory diagnosis of hereditary angioedema. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2009;30:487-492.
  7. Frazer-Abel A, Giclas PC. Update on laboratory tests for the diagnosis and differentiation of hereditary angioedema and acquired angioedema. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011;32:Suppl 1:S17-S21.
  8. Banerjee A. Current treatment of hereditary angioedema: an update on clinical studies. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2010;31:398-406.
  9. Donaldson VH. Therapy of "the neurotic edema." N Engl J Med. 1972;286(15):835-836.
  10. Riedl MA. Update on the acute treatment of hereditary angioedema. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011;32:11-16.
  11. Zuraw BL, Busse PJ, White M, et al. Nanofiltered C1 inhibitor concentrate for treatment of hereditary angioedema. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:513-522.
  12. Cicardi M, Levy RJ, McNeil DL. Ecallantide for the treatment of acute attacks in hereditary angioedema. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:523-531.
  13. Caballero T, Farkas H, Bouillet L, et al. International consensus and practical guidelines on the gynecologic and obstetric management of female patients with hereditary angioedema caused by C1 inhibitor deficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129(2):308-320.
  14. Cicardi M, Zanichelli A. Acquired angioedema. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;6(1):14.
  15. Zanichelli A, Badini M, Nataloni I, Montano N, Cicardi M. Treatment of acquired angioedema with icatibant: a case report. Intern Emerg Med. 2011;6(3):279-280.
  16. Byrd JB, Adam A, Brown NJ. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-associated angioedema. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2006;26(4):725-737.
  17. Haymore BR, Yoon J, Mikita CP, Klote MM, DeZee KJ. Risk of angioedema with angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with prior angioedema associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a meta-analysis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;101(5):495-499.
  18. Beavers CJ, Dunn SP, Macaulay TE. The role of angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema. Ann Pharmacother. 2011;45(4):520-524.
  19. Nzeako UC. Diagnosis and management of angioedema with abdominal involvement: a gastroenterology perspective. World J Gastroenterol. 2010; 16(39):4913-4921.
  20. Banerji A, Sloane DE, Sheffer AL. Hereditary angioedema: a current state-of-the-art review, V: attenuated androgens for the treatment of hereditary angioedema. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;100(1) (Suppl 2):S19-22.
  21. Zuraw BL. Clinical practice. Hereditary angioedema. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(10):1027-1036.
  22. Zuraw BL. Hereditary angioedema: a current state-of-the-art review, IV: short- and long-term treatment of hereditary angioedema: out with the old and in with the new? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;100(1) (Suppl 2):S13-S18.
  23. Bowen T, Cicardi M, Bork K, et al. Hereditary angioedema: a current state-of-the-art review, VII: Canadian Hungarian 2007 International Consensus Algorithm for the Diagnosis, Therapy, and Management of Hereditary Angioedema. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;100(1)(Suppl 2):S30-40.
  24. Craig T, Riedl M, Dykewicz M, et al. When is prophylaxis for hereditary angioedema necessary? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2009.102(5):366-372.
  25. Frank MM. Update on preventive therapy (prophylaxis) of hereditary angioedema. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011;32(1):17-21.
Issue
The Hospitalist - 2013(06)
Issue
The Hospitalist - 2013(06)
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
What Is the Best Management of Hereditary Angioedema?
Display Headline
What Is the Best Management of Hereditary Angioedema?
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)

How is Graves' Disease Diagnosed and Evaluated?

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 09/14/2018 - 12:22
Display Headline
How is Graves' Disease Diagnosed and Evaluated?

click for large version
Graves’ disease, the most common cause of hyperthyroidism, can also carry unique clinical features unrelated to thyrotoxicosis, such as ophthalmopathy and dermopathy.

Case

A 25-year-old, previously healthy woman presents with one month of anxiety, palpitations, intermittent loose non-dysenteriform stools, fine tremors, and hair loss. She has had a 20-pound weight loss in the previous four months, even though she reports an increased appetite. Her heart rate ranges from 115 to 130 beats per minute, and her temperature is 37.5oC. An exam is notable for mild bilateral proptosis, thin hair, and moist skin. A goiter is visible; it has increased consistency on palpation with an audible bruit over it. She has hyperreflexia and fine tremors. An EKG reveals sinus tachycardia. How should this patient be evaluated? What treatment should be initiated?

Overview

Graves’ disease, the most common cause of hyperthyroidism, is caused by autoimmune stimulation of the thyrotropin (TSH) receptor. It generally presents with a variety of signs and symptoms found with hyperthyroidism, but it can also carry unique clinical features unrelated to thyrotoxicosis, such as ophthalmopathy and dermopathy.

Graves’ disease diagnosis mainly is clinical, but also is supported by elevated free levels of thyroid hormones (mainly triiodothyronine [T3]) and suppressed TSH levels. Anti-thyrotropin receptor antibodies generally are present. Imaging in Graves’ disease is characterized by increased radioiodine uptake, as well as increased perfusion by Doppler ultrasonography.

Treatment can be pharmacologic, using anti-thyroid drugs, or ablative, with either radioiodine or thyroidectomy. Adjunctive therapy includes symptom control with beta-blocker agents, as well as steroid supplementation, especially in patients with orbitopathy undergoing radioablative treatment.

The Data

Epidemiology. Graves’ disease is the most common cause of hyperthyroidism, with a prevalence of ~0.5% of the population. Women are most commonly affected, with a prevalence five to 10 times higher than in male peers. The most common age of presentation is between the fifth and sixth decades of life.1-3

The fact that Graves’ disease occurs with higher incidence in patients with a family history of thyroid disease—and that concordance rates of up to 35% are seen with monozygotic twins—suggests that both genetic and environmental factors influence disease susceptibility.2,4

Pathophysiology. Graves’ disease occurs as a result of direct activation of the G-protein-coupled adenylate cyclase in the thyrotropin receptor by circulating IgG antibodies.2,3 Follicular hypertrophy and hyperplasia, and increased vascularity, cause goiter formation and an increased production of T3 and thyroxine (T4). The increase in T3 and T4 subsequently suppress TSH production.

Graves’ disease also is associated with unique clinical manifestations unrelated to the circulating levels of thyroid hormones, such as Graves’ ophthalmopathy and infiltrative dermopathy (localized or pretibial myxedema). Both of these occur as a result of local tissue infiltration by inflammatory cells and deposition of glycosaminglycanes.5

Clinical manifestations. Graves’ disease is characterized by a constellation of clinical findings and patient symptoms (see Table 1).1-3 The clinical presentation could differ in elderly patients, who present more commonly with weight loss or depression (also known as apathetic hyperthyroidism) and less commonly with tachycardia and tremor.2,3

click for large version
Table 1. Clinical Manifestations Of Hyperthyroidism

Although clinically apparent, exophtalmos is detected in 30% to 50% of patients; when using orbital imaging, it is identified in ≥80% of patients.5 Ophthalmopathy has a clinical course typically independent of the thyroid activity; its manifestations include proptosis, periorbital edema and inflammation, exposure keratitis, photophobia, extraocular muscle infiltration, and eyelid lag.5-8

Thyroid dermopathy (localized dermal myxedema) can occur in 0.5% to 4.3% of patients with Graves’ disease; it occurs most commonly among patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy, in whom it occurs in up to 13% of cases. About 20% of patients with dermal myxedema have associated thyroid acropachy.3,9

 

 

click for large version
This CT image from a patient with Graves disease shows bilateral proptosis and orbital fat deposition.

Hospitalists should be aware of thyroid storm. Although rare, occurring in only 1% to 2% of patients with hyperthyroidism, it can be a medical emergency. It is generally manifested by fever (due to severe thermogenesis), atrial tachyarrhythmias (due to hyperadrenergic response), mental status changes, and liver dysfunction.

In addition, patients with thyroid storm might present with hyperglycemia, hypercalcemia, hypocortisolism, and hypokalemia.10 Thyroid storm requires prompt treatment of both the clinical manifestations and the underlying condition.

Differential Diagnosis from Other Causes of Thyroiditis

Laboratory. The classic presentation of Graves’ disease is a suppressed TSH and elevated serum T3 and T4 levels.1-3 Generally, T3 is higher than T4, which also occurs in toxic multinodular goiter, solitary hyperfunctioning nodule, and iodine-induced hyperthyroidism.2,6 The free T3 and T4 levels should be obtained, as these are useful for monitoring response to therapy.1-3

click for large version
Table 2. Differential diagnosis of thyroiditis

Most patients with Graves’ disease also have anti-thyroid antibodies (see Table 2), although these are not required for the diagnosis.1-3,11

Following initiation of treatment, TSH levels remain suppressed for approximately two to three months, even after free T3 and T4 levels return to normal or below normal. After this period of suppression is over, TSH levels can be used to adjust therapy.1-3

Imaging. A thyroid radioiodine-uptake study provides a measure of iodine uptake, as well as an image of functioning thyroid tissue; the imaging is done 24 hours after the intake of iodine-123 or iodine-131. Generalized increased uptake is characteristic of Graves’ disease.1-3,12 In comparison, patients with thyroiditis have decreased radioiodine uptake as well as low blood flow in Doppler ultrasonography.13

In patients with large goiters, when there are signs or symptoms of upper airway or thoracic outlet obstruction, imaging with a neck and upper-chest CT scan is recommended.2 In patients with unilateral proptosis, asymmetric ophthalmopathy, or visual loss, orbital imaging is advised (CT scan or MRI).2,5 In patients with tachyarrhythmias, an electrocardiogram should evaluate for the presence of atrial fibrillation.2 Table 2 illustrates how Graves’ disease can be distinguished from other causes of thyroiditis.1-3

Initial Treatment

Treatment of Graves’ disease has two main tenets: treating the underlying thyroid disorder and quickly controlling symptoms. The underlying thyroid disorder can be treated with such anti-thyroid drugs as thionamides (methimazole or propylthiouracil), ablative radioiodine, or surgical excision of the thyroid. Adjunct symptom therapy can include beta-blockers, organic iodide, and glucocorticoids.11,14 Thionamides are preferred in young patients, pregnant women, and cases with orbital involvement.14

In pregnancy, treatment with propylthiouracil is preferred, especially during the first two trimesters due to the risk of teratogenicity with methimazole (there have been associated case reports of choanal atresia, aplasia cutis, and facial malformations).15

Steroid prophylaxis is used in patients with prominent ocular symptoms who undergo radioiodine ablation to minimize risk of worsening of ophthalmopathy.16

Back to the Case

The patient was admitted; free T3 and T4 levels were elevated, TSH was suppressed, and anti-thyroid antibodies (anti-TPO, anti-TG, and anti-TRAb) were positive. An I-123 radioiodine uptake scan showed diffuse thyroid gland uptake. Beta-blockers were initiated for heart-rate control (atenolol 25 mg) with adequate response.

Given the patient’s young age, it was decided to initiate thionamides. A pregnancy test was negative, so methimazole was initiated at a dose of 10 mg orally once daily.

Dr. Auron is a hospitalist in the Department of Hospital Medicine and the Center for Pediatric Hospital Medicine at Cleveland Clinic. Dr. Hamilton is a hospitalist in the Department of Hospital Medicine at Cleveland Clinic.

 

 

Key Points

  • Graves’ disease is an autoimmune disease and the most common etiology of hyperthyroidism.
  • A biochemical profile of hyperthyroidism should include measurement of free T3, free T4, and TSH levels.
  • Anti-thyroid antibodies can confirm the disease but are not required for diagnosis if both clinical and biochemical features are present.
  • Patients with Graves’ disease can have extrathyroid manifestations unrelated to thyrotoxicosis, such as ophthalmopathy and dermopathy.
  • The initial treatment of Graves’ disease is with anti-thyroid medications, such as thionamides, especially in young patients, during pregnancy, and in cases with ocular involvement. Beta-blockers can also be used to reduce adrenergically mediated symptoms. Steroids can be initiated in patients with orbital disease who undergo radioiodine ablative therapy.

References

  1. Baskin HJ, Cobin RH, Duick DS, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the evaluation and treatment of hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism. (2006 Amended version). Endocr Pract. 2002;8:457-469.
  2. Brent GA. Clinical practice. Graves’ disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2594-2605.
  3. Nayak B, Hodak SP. Hyperthyroidism. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2007;36:617-656.
  4. Manji N, Carr-Smith JD, Boelaert K, et al. Influences of age, gender, smoking, and family history on autoimmune thyroid disease phenotype. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:4873-4880.
  5. Bahn RS. Graves’ ophthalmopathy. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:726-738.
  6. Woeber KA. Triiodothyronine production in Graves’ hyperthyroidism. Thyroid. 2006;16:687-690.
  7. Osman F, Franklyn JA, Holder RL, Sheppard MC, Gammage MD. Cardiovascular manifestations of hyperthyroidism before and after antithyroid therapy: a matched case-control study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:71-81.
  8. Wiersinga WM, Bartalena L. Epidemiology and prevention of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Thyroid. 2002;12:855-860.
  9. Fatourechi V. Pretibial myxedema: pathophysiology and treatment options. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2005;6:295-309.
  10. Chong HW, See KC, Phua J. Thyroid storm with multiorgan failure. Thyroid. 2010;20:333-336.
  11. De Groot L. Diagnosis and treatment of Graves’ disease. Thyroid Disease Manager website. Available at: http://www.thyroidmanager.org/chapter/diagnosis-and-treatment-of-graves-disease/. Accessed Jan. 20, 2012.
  12. Cappelli C, Pirola I, De Martino E, et al. The role of imaging in Graves’ disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2008;65:99-103.
  13. Ota H, Amino N, Morita S, et al. Quantitative measurement of thyroid blood flow for differentiation of painless thyroiditis from Graves’ disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2007;67:41-45.
  14. Fumarola A, Di Fiore A, Dainelli M, Grani G, Calvanese A. Medical treatment of hyperthyroidism: state of the art. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2010;118:678-684.
  15. Fitzpatrick DL, Russell MA. Diagnosis and management of thyroid disease in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2010;37:173-193.
  16. Bartalena L. The dilemma of how to manage Graves’ hyperthyroidism in patients with associated orbitopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:592-599.
Issue
The Hospitalist - 2012(07)
Publications
Sections

click for large version
Graves’ disease, the most common cause of hyperthyroidism, can also carry unique clinical features unrelated to thyrotoxicosis, such as ophthalmopathy and dermopathy.

Case

A 25-year-old, previously healthy woman presents with one month of anxiety, palpitations, intermittent loose non-dysenteriform stools, fine tremors, and hair loss. She has had a 20-pound weight loss in the previous four months, even though she reports an increased appetite. Her heart rate ranges from 115 to 130 beats per minute, and her temperature is 37.5oC. An exam is notable for mild bilateral proptosis, thin hair, and moist skin. A goiter is visible; it has increased consistency on palpation with an audible bruit over it. She has hyperreflexia and fine tremors. An EKG reveals sinus tachycardia. How should this patient be evaluated? What treatment should be initiated?

Overview

Graves’ disease, the most common cause of hyperthyroidism, is caused by autoimmune stimulation of the thyrotropin (TSH) receptor. It generally presents with a variety of signs and symptoms found with hyperthyroidism, but it can also carry unique clinical features unrelated to thyrotoxicosis, such as ophthalmopathy and dermopathy.

Graves’ disease diagnosis mainly is clinical, but also is supported by elevated free levels of thyroid hormones (mainly triiodothyronine [T3]) and suppressed TSH levels. Anti-thyrotropin receptor antibodies generally are present. Imaging in Graves’ disease is characterized by increased radioiodine uptake, as well as increased perfusion by Doppler ultrasonography.

Treatment can be pharmacologic, using anti-thyroid drugs, or ablative, with either radioiodine or thyroidectomy. Adjunctive therapy includes symptom control with beta-blocker agents, as well as steroid supplementation, especially in patients with orbitopathy undergoing radioablative treatment.

The Data

Epidemiology. Graves’ disease is the most common cause of hyperthyroidism, with a prevalence of ~0.5% of the population. Women are most commonly affected, with a prevalence five to 10 times higher than in male peers. The most common age of presentation is between the fifth and sixth decades of life.1-3

The fact that Graves’ disease occurs with higher incidence in patients with a family history of thyroid disease—and that concordance rates of up to 35% are seen with monozygotic twins—suggests that both genetic and environmental factors influence disease susceptibility.2,4

Pathophysiology. Graves’ disease occurs as a result of direct activation of the G-protein-coupled adenylate cyclase in the thyrotropin receptor by circulating IgG antibodies.2,3 Follicular hypertrophy and hyperplasia, and increased vascularity, cause goiter formation and an increased production of T3 and thyroxine (T4). The increase in T3 and T4 subsequently suppress TSH production.

Graves’ disease also is associated with unique clinical manifestations unrelated to the circulating levels of thyroid hormones, such as Graves’ ophthalmopathy and infiltrative dermopathy (localized or pretibial myxedema). Both of these occur as a result of local tissue infiltration by inflammatory cells and deposition of glycosaminglycanes.5

Clinical manifestations. Graves’ disease is characterized by a constellation of clinical findings and patient symptoms (see Table 1).1-3 The clinical presentation could differ in elderly patients, who present more commonly with weight loss or depression (also known as apathetic hyperthyroidism) and less commonly with tachycardia and tremor.2,3

click for large version
Table 1. Clinical Manifestations Of Hyperthyroidism

Although clinically apparent, exophtalmos is detected in 30% to 50% of patients; when using orbital imaging, it is identified in ≥80% of patients.5 Ophthalmopathy has a clinical course typically independent of the thyroid activity; its manifestations include proptosis, periorbital edema and inflammation, exposure keratitis, photophobia, extraocular muscle infiltration, and eyelid lag.5-8

Thyroid dermopathy (localized dermal myxedema) can occur in 0.5% to 4.3% of patients with Graves’ disease; it occurs most commonly among patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy, in whom it occurs in up to 13% of cases. About 20% of patients with dermal myxedema have associated thyroid acropachy.3,9

 

 

click for large version
This CT image from a patient with Graves disease shows bilateral proptosis and orbital fat deposition.

Hospitalists should be aware of thyroid storm. Although rare, occurring in only 1% to 2% of patients with hyperthyroidism, it can be a medical emergency. It is generally manifested by fever (due to severe thermogenesis), atrial tachyarrhythmias (due to hyperadrenergic response), mental status changes, and liver dysfunction.

In addition, patients with thyroid storm might present with hyperglycemia, hypercalcemia, hypocortisolism, and hypokalemia.10 Thyroid storm requires prompt treatment of both the clinical manifestations and the underlying condition.

Differential Diagnosis from Other Causes of Thyroiditis

Laboratory. The classic presentation of Graves’ disease is a suppressed TSH and elevated serum T3 and T4 levels.1-3 Generally, T3 is higher than T4, which also occurs in toxic multinodular goiter, solitary hyperfunctioning nodule, and iodine-induced hyperthyroidism.2,6 The free T3 and T4 levels should be obtained, as these are useful for monitoring response to therapy.1-3

click for large version
Table 2. Differential diagnosis of thyroiditis

Most patients with Graves’ disease also have anti-thyroid antibodies (see Table 2), although these are not required for the diagnosis.1-3,11

Following initiation of treatment, TSH levels remain suppressed for approximately two to three months, even after free T3 and T4 levels return to normal or below normal. After this period of suppression is over, TSH levels can be used to adjust therapy.1-3

Imaging. A thyroid radioiodine-uptake study provides a measure of iodine uptake, as well as an image of functioning thyroid tissue; the imaging is done 24 hours after the intake of iodine-123 or iodine-131. Generalized increased uptake is characteristic of Graves’ disease.1-3,12 In comparison, patients with thyroiditis have decreased radioiodine uptake as well as low blood flow in Doppler ultrasonography.13

In patients with large goiters, when there are signs or symptoms of upper airway or thoracic outlet obstruction, imaging with a neck and upper-chest CT scan is recommended.2 In patients with unilateral proptosis, asymmetric ophthalmopathy, or visual loss, orbital imaging is advised (CT scan or MRI).2,5 In patients with tachyarrhythmias, an electrocardiogram should evaluate for the presence of atrial fibrillation.2 Table 2 illustrates how Graves’ disease can be distinguished from other causes of thyroiditis.1-3

Initial Treatment

Treatment of Graves’ disease has two main tenets: treating the underlying thyroid disorder and quickly controlling symptoms. The underlying thyroid disorder can be treated with such anti-thyroid drugs as thionamides (methimazole or propylthiouracil), ablative radioiodine, or surgical excision of the thyroid. Adjunct symptom therapy can include beta-blockers, organic iodide, and glucocorticoids.11,14 Thionamides are preferred in young patients, pregnant women, and cases with orbital involvement.14

In pregnancy, treatment with propylthiouracil is preferred, especially during the first two trimesters due to the risk of teratogenicity with methimazole (there have been associated case reports of choanal atresia, aplasia cutis, and facial malformations).15

Steroid prophylaxis is used in patients with prominent ocular symptoms who undergo radioiodine ablation to minimize risk of worsening of ophthalmopathy.16

Back to the Case

The patient was admitted; free T3 and T4 levels were elevated, TSH was suppressed, and anti-thyroid antibodies (anti-TPO, anti-TG, and anti-TRAb) were positive. An I-123 radioiodine uptake scan showed diffuse thyroid gland uptake. Beta-blockers were initiated for heart-rate control (atenolol 25 mg) with adequate response.

Given the patient’s young age, it was decided to initiate thionamides. A pregnancy test was negative, so methimazole was initiated at a dose of 10 mg orally once daily.

Dr. Auron is a hospitalist in the Department of Hospital Medicine and the Center for Pediatric Hospital Medicine at Cleveland Clinic. Dr. Hamilton is a hospitalist in the Department of Hospital Medicine at Cleveland Clinic.

 

 

Key Points

  • Graves’ disease is an autoimmune disease and the most common etiology of hyperthyroidism.
  • A biochemical profile of hyperthyroidism should include measurement of free T3, free T4, and TSH levels.
  • Anti-thyroid antibodies can confirm the disease but are not required for diagnosis if both clinical and biochemical features are present.
  • Patients with Graves’ disease can have extrathyroid manifestations unrelated to thyrotoxicosis, such as ophthalmopathy and dermopathy.
  • The initial treatment of Graves’ disease is with anti-thyroid medications, such as thionamides, especially in young patients, during pregnancy, and in cases with ocular involvement. Beta-blockers can also be used to reduce adrenergically mediated symptoms. Steroids can be initiated in patients with orbital disease who undergo radioiodine ablative therapy.

References

  1. Baskin HJ, Cobin RH, Duick DS, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the evaluation and treatment of hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism. (2006 Amended version). Endocr Pract. 2002;8:457-469.
  2. Brent GA. Clinical practice. Graves’ disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2594-2605.
  3. Nayak B, Hodak SP. Hyperthyroidism. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2007;36:617-656.
  4. Manji N, Carr-Smith JD, Boelaert K, et al. Influences of age, gender, smoking, and family history on autoimmune thyroid disease phenotype. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:4873-4880.
  5. Bahn RS. Graves’ ophthalmopathy. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:726-738.
  6. Woeber KA. Triiodothyronine production in Graves’ hyperthyroidism. Thyroid. 2006;16:687-690.
  7. Osman F, Franklyn JA, Holder RL, Sheppard MC, Gammage MD. Cardiovascular manifestations of hyperthyroidism before and after antithyroid therapy: a matched case-control study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:71-81.
  8. Wiersinga WM, Bartalena L. Epidemiology and prevention of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Thyroid. 2002;12:855-860.
  9. Fatourechi V. Pretibial myxedema: pathophysiology and treatment options. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2005;6:295-309.
  10. Chong HW, See KC, Phua J. Thyroid storm with multiorgan failure. Thyroid. 2010;20:333-336.
  11. De Groot L. Diagnosis and treatment of Graves’ disease. Thyroid Disease Manager website. Available at: http://www.thyroidmanager.org/chapter/diagnosis-and-treatment-of-graves-disease/. Accessed Jan. 20, 2012.
  12. Cappelli C, Pirola I, De Martino E, et al. The role of imaging in Graves’ disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2008;65:99-103.
  13. Ota H, Amino N, Morita S, et al. Quantitative measurement of thyroid blood flow for differentiation of painless thyroiditis from Graves’ disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2007;67:41-45.
  14. Fumarola A, Di Fiore A, Dainelli M, Grani G, Calvanese A. Medical treatment of hyperthyroidism: state of the art. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2010;118:678-684.
  15. Fitzpatrick DL, Russell MA. Diagnosis and management of thyroid disease in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2010;37:173-193.
  16. Bartalena L. The dilemma of how to manage Graves’ hyperthyroidism in patients with associated orbitopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:592-599.

click for large version
Graves’ disease, the most common cause of hyperthyroidism, can also carry unique clinical features unrelated to thyrotoxicosis, such as ophthalmopathy and dermopathy.

Case

A 25-year-old, previously healthy woman presents with one month of anxiety, palpitations, intermittent loose non-dysenteriform stools, fine tremors, and hair loss. She has had a 20-pound weight loss in the previous four months, even though she reports an increased appetite. Her heart rate ranges from 115 to 130 beats per minute, and her temperature is 37.5oC. An exam is notable for mild bilateral proptosis, thin hair, and moist skin. A goiter is visible; it has increased consistency on palpation with an audible bruit over it. She has hyperreflexia and fine tremors. An EKG reveals sinus tachycardia. How should this patient be evaluated? What treatment should be initiated?

Overview

Graves’ disease, the most common cause of hyperthyroidism, is caused by autoimmune stimulation of the thyrotropin (TSH) receptor. It generally presents with a variety of signs and symptoms found with hyperthyroidism, but it can also carry unique clinical features unrelated to thyrotoxicosis, such as ophthalmopathy and dermopathy.

Graves’ disease diagnosis mainly is clinical, but also is supported by elevated free levels of thyroid hormones (mainly triiodothyronine [T3]) and suppressed TSH levels. Anti-thyrotropin receptor antibodies generally are present. Imaging in Graves’ disease is characterized by increased radioiodine uptake, as well as increased perfusion by Doppler ultrasonography.

Treatment can be pharmacologic, using anti-thyroid drugs, or ablative, with either radioiodine or thyroidectomy. Adjunctive therapy includes symptom control with beta-blocker agents, as well as steroid supplementation, especially in patients with orbitopathy undergoing radioablative treatment.

The Data

Epidemiology. Graves’ disease is the most common cause of hyperthyroidism, with a prevalence of ~0.5% of the population. Women are most commonly affected, with a prevalence five to 10 times higher than in male peers. The most common age of presentation is between the fifth and sixth decades of life.1-3

The fact that Graves’ disease occurs with higher incidence in patients with a family history of thyroid disease—and that concordance rates of up to 35% are seen with monozygotic twins—suggests that both genetic and environmental factors influence disease susceptibility.2,4

Pathophysiology. Graves’ disease occurs as a result of direct activation of the G-protein-coupled adenylate cyclase in the thyrotropin receptor by circulating IgG antibodies.2,3 Follicular hypertrophy and hyperplasia, and increased vascularity, cause goiter formation and an increased production of T3 and thyroxine (T4). The increase in T3 and T4 subsequently suppress TSH production.

Graves’ disease also is associated with unique clinical manifestations unrelated to the circulating levels of thyroid hormones, such as Graves’ ophthalmopathy and infiltrative dermopathy (localized or pretibial myxedema). Both of these occur as a result of local tissue infiltration by inflammatory cells and deposition of glycosaminglycanes.5

Clinical manifestations. Graves’ disease is characterized by a constellation of clinical findings and patient symptoms (see Table 1).1-3 The clinical presentation could differ in elderly patients, who present more commonly with weight loss or depression (also known as apathetic hyperthyroidism) and less commonly with tachycardia and tremor.2,3

click for large version
Table 1. Clinical Manifestations Of Hyperthyroidism

Although clinically apparent, exophtalmos is detected in 30% to 50% of patients; when using orbital imaging, it is identified in ≥80% of patients.5 Ophthalmopathy has a clinical course typically independent of the thyroid activity; its manifestations include proptosis, periorbital edema and inflammation, exposure keratitis, photophobia, extraocular muscle infiltration, and eyelid lag.5-8

Thyroid dermopathy (localized dermal myxedema) can occur in 0.5% to 4.3% of patients with Graves’ disease; it occurs most commonly among patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy, in whom it occurs in up to 13% of cases. About 20% of patients with dermal myxedema have associated thyroid acropachy.3,9

 

 

click for large version
This CT image from a patient with Graves disease shows bilateral proptosis and orbital fat deposition.

Hospitalists should be aware of thyroid storm. Although rare, occurring in only 1% to 2% of patients with hyperthyroidism, it can be a medical emergency. It is generally manifested by fever (due to severe thermogenesis), atrial tachyarrhythmias (due to hyperadrenergic response), mental status changes, and liver dysfunction.

In addition, patients with thyroid storm might present with hyperglycemia, hypercalcemia, hypocortisolism, and hypokalemia.10 Thyroid storm requires prompt treatment of both the clinical manifestations and the underlying condition.

Differential Diagnosis from Other Causes of Thyroiditis

Laboratory. The classic presentation of Graves’ disease is a suppressed TSH and elevated serum T3 and T4 levels.1-3 Generally, T3 is higher than T4, which also occurs in toxic multinodular goiter, solitary hyperfunctioning nodule, and iodine-induced hyperthyroidism.2,6 The free T3 and T4 levels should be obtained, as these are useful for monitoring response to therapy.1-3

click for large version
Table 2. Differential diagnosis of thyroiditis

Most patients with Graves’ disease also have anti-thyroid antibodies (see Table 2), although these are not required for the diagnosis.1-3,11

Following initiation of treatment, TSH levels remain suppressed for approximately two to three months, even after free T3 and T4 levels return to normal or below normal. After this period of suppression is over, TSH levels can be used to adjust therapy.1-3

Imaging. A thyroid radioiodine-uptake study provides a measure of iodine uptake, as well as an image of functioning thyroid tissue; the imaging is done 24 hours after the intake of iodine-123 or iodine-131. Generalized increased uptake is characteristic of Graves’ disease.1-3,12 In comparison, patients with thyroiditis have decreased radioiodine uptake as well as low blood flow in Doppler ultrasonography.13

In patients with large goiters, when there are signs or symptoms of upper airway or thoracic outlet obstruction, imaging with a neck and upper-chest CT scan is recommended.2 In patients with unilateral proptosis, asymmetric ophthalmopathy, or visual loss, orbital imaging is advised (CT scan or MRI).2,5 In patients with tachyarrhythmias, an electrocardiogram should evaluate for the presence of atrial fibrillation.2 Table 2 illustrates how Graves’ disease can be distinguished from other causes of thyroiditis.1-3

Initial Treatment

Treatment of Graves’ disease has two main tenets: treating the underlying thyroid disorder and quickly controlling symptoms. The underlying thyroid disorder can be treated with such anti-thyroid drugs as thionamides (methimazole or propylthiouracil), ablative radioiodine, or surgical excision of the thyroid. Adjunct symptom therapy can include beta-blockers, organic iodide, and glucocorticoids.11,14 Thionamides are preferred in young patients, pregnant women, and cases with orbital involvement.14

In pregnancy, treatment with propylthiouracil is preferred, especially during the first two trimesters due to the risk of teratogenicity with methimazole (there have been associated case reports of choanal atresia, aplasia cutis, and facial malformations).15

Steroid prophylaxis is used in patients with prominent ocular symptoms who undergo radioiodine ablation to minimize risk of worsening of ophthalmopathy.16

Back to the Case

The patient was admitted; free T3 and T4 levels were elevated, TSH was suppressed, and anti-thyroid antibodies (anti-TPO, anti-TG, and anti-TRAb) were positive. An I-123 radioiodine uptake scan showed diffuse thyroid gland uptake. Beta-blockers were initiated for heart-rate control (atenolol 25 mg) with adequate response.

Given the patient’s young age, it was decided to initiate thionamides. A pregnancy test was negative, so methimazole was initiated at a dose of 10 mg orally once daily.

Dr. Auron is a hospitalist in the Department of Hospital Medicine and the Center for Pediatric Hospital Medicine at Cleveland Clinic. Dr. Hamilton is a hospitalist in the Department of Hospital Medicine at Cleveland Clinic.

 

 

Key Points

  • Graves’ disease is an autoimmune disease and the most common etiology of hyperthyroidism.
  • A biochemical profile of hyperthyroidism should include measurement of free T3, free T4, and TSH levels.
  • Anti-thyroid antibodies can confirm the disease but are not required for diagnosis if both clinical and biochemical features are present.
  • Patients with Graves’ disease can have extrathyroid manifestations unrelated to thyrotoxicosis, such as ophthalmopathy and dermopathy.
  • The initial treatment of Graves’ disease is with anti-thyroid medications, such as thionamides, especially in young patients, during pregnancy, and in cases with ocular involvement. Beta-blockers can also be used to reduce adrenergically mediated symptoms. Steroids can be initiated in patients with orbital disease who undergo radioiodine ablative therapy.

References

  1. Baskin HJ, Cobin RH, Duick DS, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the evaluation and treatment of hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism. (2006 Amended version). Endocr Pract. 2002;8:457-469.
  2. Brent GA. Clinical practice. Graves’ disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2594-2605.
  3. Nayak B, Hodak SP. Hyperthyroidism. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2007;36:617-656.
  4. Manji N, Carr-Smith JD, Boelaert K, et al. Influences of age, gender, smoking, and family history on autoimmune thyroid disease phenotype. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:4873-4880.
  5. Bahn RS. Graves’ ophthalmopathy. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:726-738.
  6. Woeber KA. Triiodothyronine production in Graves’ hyperthyroidism. Thyroid. 2006;16:687-690.
  7. Osman F, Franklyn JA, Holder RL, Sheppard MC, Gammage MD. Cardiovascular manifestations of hyperthyroidism before and after antithyroid therapy: a matched case-control study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:71-81.
  8. Wiersinga WM, Bartalena L. Epidemiology and prevention of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Thyroid. 2002;12:855-860.
  9. Fatourechi V. Pretibial myxedema: pathophysiology and treatment options. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2005;6:295-309.
  10. Chong HW, See KC, Phua J. Thyroid storm with multiorgan failure. Thyroid. 2010;20:333-336.
  11. De Groot L. Diagnosis and treatment of Graves’ disease. Thyroid Disease Manager website. Available at: http://www.thyroidmanager.org/chapter/diagnosis-and-treatment-of-graves-disease/. Accessed Jan. 20, 2012.
  12. Cappelli C, Pirola I, De Martino E, et al. The role of imaging in Graves’ disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2008;65:99-103.
  13. Ota H, Amino N, Morita S, et al. Quantitative measurement of thyroid blood flow for differentiation of painless thyroiditis from Graves’ disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2007;67:41-45.
  14. Fumarola A, Di Fiore A, Dainelli M, Grani G, Calvanese A. Medical treatment of hyperthyroidism: state of the art. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2010;118:678-684.
  15. Fitzpatrick DL, Russell MA. Diagnosis and management of thyroid disease in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2010;37:173-193.
  16. Bartalena L. The dilemma of how to manage Graves’ hyperthyroidism in patients with associated orbitopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:592-599.
Issue
The Hospitalist - 2012(07)
Issue
The Hospitalist - 2012(07)
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
How is Graves' Disease Diagnosed and Evaluated?
Display Headline
How is Graves' Disease Diagnosed and Evaluated?
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)

Stevens‐Johnson and mycoplasma pneumoniae: A scary duo

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/02/2017 - 19:34
Display Headline
Stevens‐Johnson and mycoplasma pneumoniae: A scary duo

A 15‐year‐old male was hospitalized with painful blisters on the lips and ulcers in the oral mucosa that were preceded by upper respiratory infection symptoms for 1 week. He had not been treated with antimicrobials. He subsequently developed conjunctival injection and painful blisters at the urethral meatus and symmetric scattered target lesions in the extremities. Examination demonstrated low‐grade fever, mild conjunctival injection (Figure 2), and oral vesicular lesions affecting the lips (Figure 1) and both the hard and soft palate; he had vesicular lesions affecting the glans penis, a ruptured vesicle at the urethral meatus and target lesions in the arms (Figure 3) and legs (Figure 4). His cardiopulmonary exam was normal. He was started on acyclovir and azithromycin, and symptomatic treatment with oral lidocaine and morphine. Serologies for Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Coxsackievirus and cultures for herpes simplex virus (HSV) were negative. Mycoplasma pneumoniae immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM titers were significantly elevated (>4‐fold) and the diagnosis made of Stevens‐Johnson syndrome (SJS) secondary to Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. He was able to tolerate oral intake after a 1‐week hospital course.

M. pneumoniae infection can cause mucocutaneous involvement varying from mild mucositis to SJS with significant morbidity and mortality, 1, 2 mostly in the pediatric population. The differential diagnosis includes HSV, Kawasaki, and Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome, as well as other viral infections (eg, Coxsackievirus).3 Pharmacologic causesespecially antibiotics, non steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug (NSAIDS) and anticonvulsantsshould also be considered in the etiology of SJS4 especially in the adult population.

Figure 1
Oral vesicular lesions and mucositis. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]
Figure 2
Mild conjunctival injection. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]
Figure 3
Target lesions. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]
Figure 4
Target lesions. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]
References
  1. Schalock PC. Erythema multiforme due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in two children. Pediatr Dermatol. 2006;23(6):546555.
  2. Sendi P. Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection complicated by severe mucocutaneous lesions. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8:268.
  3. Ravin KA, Rappaport LD, Zuckerbraun NS, Wadowsky RM, Wald ER, Michaels MM. Mycoplasma pneumoniae and atypical Stevens‐Johnson syndrome: a case series. Pediatrics. 2007;119:e1002e1005.
  4. Mulvey JM, Padowitz A, Lindley‐Jones M, Nickels R. Mycoplasma pneumoniae associated with Stevens Johnson syndrome. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007;35:414417.
Article PDF
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 5(9)
Publications
Page Number
567-568
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF

A 15‐year‐old male was hospitalized with painful blisters on the lips and ulcers in the oral mucosa that were preceded by upper respiratory infection symptoms for 1 week. He had not been treated with antimicrobials. He subsequently developed conjunctival injection and painful blisters at the urethral meatus and symmetric scattered target lesions in the extremities. Examination demonstrated low‐grade fever, mild conjunctival injection (Figure 2), and oral vesicular lesions affecting the lips (Figure 1) and both the hard and soft palate; he had vesicular lesions affecting the glans penis, a ruptured vesicle at the urethral meatus and target lesions in the arms (Figure 3) and legs (Figure 4). His cardiopulmonary exam was normal. He was started on acyclovir and azithromycin, and symptomatic treatment with oral lidocaine and morphine. Serologies for Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Coxsackievirus and cultures for herpes simplex virus (HSV) were negative. Mycoplasma pneumoniae immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM titers were significantly elevated (>4‐fold) and the diagnosis made of Stevens‐Johnson syndrome (SJS) secondary to Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. He was able to tolerate oral intake after a 1‐week hospital course.

M. pneumoniae infection can cause mucocutaneous involvement varying from mild mucositis to SJS with significant morbidity and mortality, 1, 2 mostly in the pediatric population. The differential diagnosis includes HSV, Kawasaki, and Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome, as well as other viral infections (eg, Coxsackievirus).3 Pharmacologic causesespecially antibiotics, non steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug (NSAIDS) and anticonvulsantsshould also be considered in the etiology of SJS4 especially in the adult population.

Figure 1
Oral vesicular lesions and mucositis. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]
Figure 2
Mild conjunctival injection. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]
Figure 3
Target lesions. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]
Figure 4
Target lesions. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]

A 15‐year‐old male was hospitalized with painful blisters on the lips and ulcers in the oral mucosa that were preceded by upper respiratory infection symptoms for 1 week. He had not been treated with antimicrobials. He subsequently developed conjunctival injection and painful blisters at the urethral meatus and symmetric scattered target lesions in the extremities. Examination demonstrated low‐grade fever, mild conjunctival injection (Figure 2), and oral vesicular lesions affecting the lips (Figure 1) and both the hard and soft palate; he had vesicular lesions affecting the glans penis, a ruptured vesicle at the urethral meatus and target lesions in the arms (Figure 3) and legs (Figure 4). His cardiopulmonary exam was normal. He was started on acyclovir and azithromycin, and symptomatic treatment with oral lidocaine and morphine. Serologies for Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Coxsackievirus and cultures for herpes simplex virus (HSV) were negative. Mycoplasma pneumoniae immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM titers were significantly elevated (>4‐fold) and the diagnosis made of Stevens‐Johnson syndrome (SJS) secondary to Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. He was able to tolerate oral intake after a 1‐week hospital course.

M. pneumoniae infection can cause mucocutaneous involvement varying from mild mucositis to SJS with significant morbidity and mortality, 1, 2 mostly in the pediatric population. The differential diagnosis includes HSV, Kawasaki, and Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome, as well as other viral infections (eg, Coxsackievirus).3 Pharmacologic causesespecially antibiotics, non steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug (NSAIDS) and anticonvulsantsshould also be considered in the etiology of SJS4 especially in the adult population.

Figure 1
Oral vesicular lesions and mucositis. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]
Figure 2
Mild conjunctival injection. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]
Figure 3
Target lesions. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]
Figure 4
Target lesions. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]
References
  1. Schalock PC. Erythema multiforme due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in two children. Pediatr Dermatol. 2006;23(6):546555.
  2. Sendi P. Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection complicated by severe mucocutaneous lesions. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8:268.
  3. Ravin KA, Rappaport LD, Zuckerbraun NS, Wadowsky RM, Wald ER, Michaels MM. Mycoplasma pneumoniae and atypical Stevens‐Johnson syndrome: a case series. Pediatrics. 2007;119:e1002e1005.
  4. Mulvey JM, Padowitz A, Lindley‐Jones M, Nickels R. Mycoplasma pneumoniae associated with Stevens Johnson syndrome. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007;35:414417.
References
  1. Schalock PC. Erythema multiforme due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in two children. Pediatr Dermatol. 2006;23(6):546555.
  2. Sendi P. Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection complicated by severe mucocutaneous lesions. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8:268.
  3. Ravin KA, Rappaport LD, Zuckerbraun NS, Wadowsky RM, Wald ER, Michaels MM. Mycoplasma pneumoniae and atypical Stevens‐Johnson syndrome: a case series. Pediatrics. 2007;119:e1002e1005.
  4. Mulvey JM, Padowitz A, Lindley‐Jones M, Nickels R. Mycoplasma pneumoniae associated with Stevens Johnson syndrome. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007;35:414417.
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 5(9)
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 5(9)
Page Number
567-568
Page Number
567-568
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Stevens‐Johnson and mycoplasma pneumoniae: A scary duo
Display Headline
Stevens‐Johnson and mycoplasma pneumoniae: A scary duo
Sections
Article Source
Copyright © 2010 Society of Hospital Medicine
Disallow All Ads
Correspondence Location
9500 Euclid Ave. S70, Cleveland, Ohio 44130
Content Gating
Gated (full article locked unless allowed per User)
Gating Strategy
First Peek Free
Article PDF Media