Article Type
Changed
Wed, 02/23/2022 - 14:10
Dr. Gudesblatt scans the journals, so you don’t have to!

Mark Gudesblatt, MD
There are multiple effective disease modifying therapies (DMT) available from which to choose to treat people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). The patient and prescribing clinician’s DMT choices are both affected by multiple factors in the real-world including cost, insurance step plan, and coverage, as well as frequency, route of administration, and traditional risk/benefit perceptions. Despite the multiple issues to address, concerns related to how to weigh DMT choice with the ongoing viral pandemic and how to assess the impact of choice on patient safety from Covid-19 infection, re-infection and protection from vaccination response, or need to repeat vaccination in what appears to be continually mutating Covid-19 remains both complicated and uncertain.  The importance of additional information regarding these concerns and incorporating this data into the shared decision-making process remains a topic of great interest. As reviewed last month, vaccination response can vary along DMT choice and class. PwMS who were untreated or received “immunomodulatory DMT” (IM-DMT) showed excellent seroconversion rates after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination; however, Bsteh G et al found that “immunosuppressive DMT” (IS-DMT) was associated with lower seroconversion rates. For these PwMS (N = 456) 3 months after vaccination seroconversion occurred in 96.7% of untreated PwMS (N = 91), 97.1% of IM-DMT treated PwMS (N = 139), and 61.1% of IS-DMT  treated PwMS(N = 226) compared with 97.4% of healthy control individuals (N = 116) (P < .001), with IS-DMT being the only significant predictor of poorer seroconversion (odds ratio 0.04; P < .001). Another study specifically exploring both varied DMT and quantitative response noted that spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were higher in PwMS treated with dimethyl fumarate (DMF) (N = 5) or natalizumab (N = 6) vs. healthy controls (N = 13). However, RBD IgG levels were significantly lower in patients receiving sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1P) (N = 7) or anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) (rituximab, n = 13, or ocrelizumab, n = 22). Post-vaccination spike RBD IgG levels were significantly higher in PwMS treated with DMF (P = .038) and natalizumab (P < .0001) than in healthy controls, whereas patients receiving S1P (P = .01), rituximab (P = .002), or ocrelizumab (P = .0004) showed significantly reduced RBD IgG levels.  However, a Norwegian study demonstrated that incorporating a third dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine increased the levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies in PwMS (N = 130) treated with anti-CD20 therapy (N = 101) or fingolimod (N = 29) who previously had had a weak humoral response after 2 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. After re-vaccination, the mean levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD IgG titers increased significantly in both anti-CD20 (75.7 arbitrary units [AU]; P < .001) and fingolimod (29.6 AU; P = .006) treated groups without serious adverse events recorded.  A decline in mean absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) of ≥21.2% within the first 3 months of treatment with DMF in PwMS increased the risk for DMF associated-lymphopenia by 6.5-fold (adjusted hazard risk [aHR] 6.503), whereas a decline of ≥40.2% increased the risk for severe lymphopenia by 12.67-fold (aHR 12.67; both P < .0010). The impact of DMF lymphopenia on vaccine response is unknown at the present.   The take home practical message for the treating MS clinician is to include considerations of vaccine response in the shared decision making (SDM) process of patient centric DMT choice and monitor ALC impact. Including baseline anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD information proactively at the time of DMT choice might be of importance in SDM.  This varied vaccination response and treatment strategies continue to be an evolving and important area of DMT choice impact for long term safety of PwMS beyond relapse and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS).

Publications
Topics
Sections
Dr. Gudesblatt scans the journals, so you don’t have to!
Dr. Gudesblatt scans the journals, so you don’t have to!

Mark Gudesblatt, MD
There are multiple effective disease modifying therapies (DMT) available from which to choose to treat people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). The patient and prescribing clinician’s DMT choices are both affected by multiple factors in the real-world including cost, insurance step plan, and coverage, as well as frequency, route of administration, and traditional risk/benefit perceptions. Despite the multiple issues to address, concerns related to how to weigh DMT choice with the ongoing viral pandemic and how to assess the impact of choice on patient safety from Covid-19 infection, re-infection and protection from vaccination response, or need to repeat vaccination in what appears to be continually mutating Covid-19 remains both complicated and uncertain.  The importance of additional information regarding these concerns and incorporating this data into the shared decision-making process remains a topic of great interest. As reviewed last month, vaccination response can vary along DMT choice and class. PwMS who were untreated or received “immunomodulatory DMT” (IM-DMT) showed excellent seroconversion rates after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination; however, Bsteh G et al found that “immunosuppressive DMT” (IS-DMT) was associated with lower seroconversion rates. For these PwMS (N = 456) 3 months after vaccination seroconversion occurred in 96.7% of untreated PwMS (N = 91), 97.1% of IM-DMT treated PwMS (N = 139), and 61.1% of IS-DMT  treated PwMS(N = 226) compared with 97.4% of healthy control individuals (N = 116) (P < .001), with IS-DMT being the only significant predictor of poorer seroconversion (odds ratio 0.04; P < .001). Another study specifically exploring both varied DMT and quantitative response noted that spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were higher in PwMS treated with dimethyl fumarate (DMF) (N = 5) or natalizumab (N = 6) vs. healthy controls (N = 13). However, RBD IgG levels were significantly lower in patients receiving sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1P) (N = 7) or anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) (rituximab, n = 13, or ocrelizumab, n = 22). Post-vaccination spike RBD IgG levels were significantly higher in PwMS treated with DMF (P = .038) and natalizumab (P < .0001) than in healthy controls, whereas patients receiving S1P (P = .01), rituximab (P = .002), or ocrelizumab (P = .0004) showed significantly reduced RBD IgG levels.  However, a Norwegian study demonstrated that incorporating a third dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine increased the levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies in PwMS (N = 130) treated with anti-CD20 therapy (N = 101) or fingolimod (N = 29) who previously had had a weak humoral response after 2 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. After re-vaccination, the mean levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD IgG titers increased significantly in both anti-CD20 (75.7 arbitrary units [AU]; P < .001) and fingolimod (29.6 AU; P = .006) treated groups without serious adverse events recorded.  A decline in mean absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) of ≥21.2% within the first 3 months of treatment with DMF in PwMS increased the risk for DMF associated-lymphopenia by 6.5-fold (adjusted hazard risk [aHR] 6.503), whereas a decline of ≥40.2% increased the risk for severe lymphopenia by 12.67-fold (aHR 12.67; both P < .0010). The impact of DMF lymphopenia on vaccine response is unknown at the present.   The take home practical message for the treating MS clinician is to include considerations of vaccine response in the shared decision making (SDM) process of patient centric DMT choice and monitor ALC impact. Including baseline anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD information proactively at the time of DMT choice might be of importance in SDM.  This varied vaccination response and treatment strategies continue to be an evolving and important area of DMT choice impact for long term safety of PwMS beyond relapse and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS).

Mark Gudesblatt, MD
There are multiple effective disease modifying therapies (DMT) available from which to choose to treat people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). The patient and prescribing clinician’s DMT choices are both affected by multiple factors in the real-world including cost, insurance step plan, and coverage, as well as frequency, route of administration, and traditional risk/benefit perceptions. Despite the multiple issues to address, concerns related to how to weigh DMT choice with the ongoing viral pandemic and how to assess the impact of choice on patient safety from Covid-19 infection, re-infection and protection from vaccination response, or need to repeat vaccination in what appears to be continually mutating Covid-19 remains both complicated and uncertain.  The importance of additional information regarding these concerns and incorporating this data into the shared decision-making process remains a topic of great interest. As reviewed last month, vaccination response can vary along DMT choice and class. PwMS who were untreated or received “immunomodulatory DMT” (IM-DMT) showed excellent seroconversion rates after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination; however, Bsteh G et al found that “immunosuppressive DMT” (IS-DMT) was associated with lower seroconversion rates. For these PwMS (N = 456) 3 months after vaccination seroconversion occurred in 96.7% of untreated PwMS (N = 91), 97.1% of IM-DMT treated PwMS (N = 139), and 61.1% of IS-DMT  treated PwMS(N = 226) compared with 97.4% of healthy control individuals (N = 116) (P < .001), with IS-DMT being the only significant predictor of poorer seroconversion (odds ratio 0.04; P < .001). Another study specifically exploring both varied DMT and quantitative response noted that spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were higher in PwMS treated with dimethyl fumarate (DMF) (N = 5) or natalizumab (N = 6) vs. healthy controls (N = 13). However, RBD IgG levels were significantly lower in patients receiving sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1P) (N = 7) or anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) (rituximab, n = 13, or ocrelizumab, n = 22). Post-vaccination spike RBD IgG levels were significantly higher in PwMS treated with DMF (P = .038) and natalizumab (P < .0001) than in healthy controls, whereas patients receiving S1P (P = .01), rituximab (P = .002), or ocrelizumab (P = .0004) showed significantly reduced RBD IgG levels.  However, a Norwegian study demonstrated that incorporating a third dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine increased the levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies in PwMS (N = 130) treated with anti-CD20 therapy (N = 101) or fingolimod (N = 29) who previously had had a weak humoral response after 2 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. After re-vaccination, the mean levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD IgG titers increased significantly in both anti-CD20 (75.7 arbitrary units [AU]; P < .001) and fingolimod (29.6 AU; P = .006) treated groups without serious adverse events recorded.  A decline in mean absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) of ≥21.2% within the first 3 months of treatment with DMF in PwMS increased the risk for DMF associated-lymphopenia by 6.5-fold (adjusted hazard risk [aHR] 6.503), whereas a decline of ≥40.2% increased the risk for severe lymphopenia by 12.67-fold (aHR 12.67; both P < .0010). The impact of DMF lymphopenia on vaccine response is unknown at the present.   The take home practical message for the treating MS clinician is to include considerations of vaccine response in the shared decision making (SDM) process of patient centric DMT choice and monitor ALC impact. Including baseline anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD information proactively at the time of DMT choice might be of importance in SDM.  This varied vaccination response and treatment strategies continue to be an evolving and important area of DMT choice impact for long term safety of PwMS beyond relapse and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS).

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Multiple Sclerosis March 2022
Gate On Date
Tue, 02/01/2022 - 10:30
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 02/01/2022 - 10:30
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 02/01/2022 - 10:30
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article