User login
Key clinical point: Treatment-free remission (TFR) was durable in a large proportion of patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) who switched to nilotinib from imatinib. However, careful management of adverse events (AEs) is required in patients reinitiating nilotinib after TFR.
Major finding: At 5 years, the rate of successful TFR and overall survival was 42.9% and 95.9%, respectively. Of 59 patients reinitiating nilotinib, 98.3% of patients regained major molecular response. Overall, AEs increased in nilotinib reinitiation vs. consolidation phase (67.8% vs. 28.2%) including a higher frequency of cardiovascular events (27.1% vs. 6.1%).
Study details: Findings are from an updated analysis of phase 2 ENESTop trial including patients with CML-CP who achieved sustained deep molecular response only after switching from imatinib to nilotinib. TFR was attempted by 126 patients following 1 year of nilotinib consolidation phase.
Disclosures: This study was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. The lead author reported financial and nonfinancial ties with Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis. Some investigators reported ties with various pharmaceutical companies including Novartis.
Source: Hughes TP et al. Leukemia. 2021 May 12. doi: 10.1038/s41375-021-01260-y.
Key clinical point: Treatment-free remission (TFR) was durable in a large proportion of patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) who switched to nilotinib from imatinib. However, careful management of adverse events (AEs) is required in patients reinitiating nilotinib after TFR.
Major finding: At 5 years, the rate of successful TFR and overall survival was 42.9% and 95.9%, respectively. Of 59 patients reinitiating nilotinib, 98.3% of patients regained major molecular response. Overall, AEs increased in nilotinib reinitiation vs. consolidation phase (67.8% vs. 28.2%) including a higher frequency of cardiovascular events (27.1% vs. 6.1%).
Study details: Findings are from an updated analysis of phase 2 ENESTop trial including patients with CML-CP who achieved sustained deep molecular response only after switching from imatinib to nilotinib. TFR was attempted by 126 patients following 1 year of nilotinib consolidation phase.
Disclosures: This study was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. The lead author reported financial and nonfinancial ties with Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis. Some investigators reported ties with various pharmaceutical companies including Novartis.
Source: Hughes TP et al. Leukemia. 2021 May 12. doi: 10.1038/s41375-021-01260-y.
Key clinical point: Treatment-free remission (TFR) was durable in a large proportion of patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) who switched to nilotinib from imatinib. However, careful management of adverse events (AEs) is required in patients reinitiating nilotinib after TFR.
Major finding: At 5 years, the rate of successful TFR and overall survival was 42.9% and 95.9%, respectively. Of 59 patients reinitiating nilotinib, 98.3% of patients regained major molecular response. Overall, AEs increased in nilotinib reinitiation vs. consolidation phase (67.8% vs. 28.2%) including a higher frequency of cardiovascular events (27.1% vs. 6.1%).
Study details: Findings are from an updated analysis of phase 2 ENESTop trial including patients with CML-CP who achieved sustained deep molecular response only after switching from imatinib to nilotinib. TFR was attempted by 126 patients following 1 year of nilotinib consolidation phase.
Disclosures: This study was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. The lead author reported financial and nonfinancial ties with Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis. Some investigators reported ties with various pharmaceutical companies including Novartis.
Source: Hughes TP et al. Leukemia. 2021 May 12. doi: 10.1038/s41375-021-01260-y.