Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/09/2023 - 09:38

 

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the healthcare system in a multitude of ways, affecting healthcare capacity, treatment of other illnesses, and wellness as well as professional retention of healthcare workers.1-3 During the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare capacity was tested and resources were used up quickly.1 As the pandemic has progressed, healthcare systems have had to decide how to proceed with lessons learned, reassessing the environment of care delivery, healthcare supply chains, workforce structures, communication systems, and scientific collaboration as well as policy frameworks in healthcare.4 

There have been both immediate effects and long-term consequences of the delay in care for other conditions.2,5 One stark example of this is in cancer care, where screening and procedures were postponed or canceled due to the pandemic with a resulting predicted 2% increase in cancer mortality in the next 10 years.2 The care of heart disease, chronic illnesses, and other viruses has also been similarly negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic due to similar delays in diagnosis and treatment.5-7 

The impact on healthcare workers has also been profound.3 Occupational stress from the pandemic has correlated with increased depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among other mental health diseases in healthcare workers.3 In a survey of neurosurgery residents, 26.1% of physicians reported feeling burnt out, and 65.8% were worried that they would not be able to reach surgical milestones.8,9 Among respiratory therapists, a hard hit group during this time, 79% reported burnout.10 Additionally, more healthcare workers left the field during the pandemic, with 15 million lost jobs. Future recovery of jobs looks bleak in some settings, like long-term care and among assistants and aides.11 Overall, the long-term outcomes of these resource, disease, and mental health disruptions need to be assessed and solutions created to maintain a quality and effective healthcare system, with ample resources and measures to account for disease increases and address the impact on providers. 

Healthcare Capacity and Resources 

With COVID-19 affecting over 100 million in the United States as of March 1, 2023, the impact on healthcare resources since the start of the pandemic has been immense.12 With 5% to 38% of hospitalized patients being admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and 75% to 88% of those patients requiring mechanical ventilation, a huge strain was placed on resources during and after the pandemic.1 

The question of balancing resources for other hospital needs while tending to patients with COVID-19 has been an ongoing discussion at many levels.1 One core resource concern is the lack of staff. In a survey of 77 different countries, including physicians (41%), nurses (40%), respiratory therapists (11%), and advanced practice providers (8%), 15% reported insufficient intensivists and 32% reported insufficient ICU nursing staff during March and April of 2020.1 A lack of hospital and care space that led to reallocation of limited-care acute care space was a concern. Thirteen percent reported a shortage of hospital ICU beds, while others reported the conversion of postoperative recovery rooms (20%) and operating rooms (12%) for patients with COVID-19.1 

Along with staff and care space concerns, hospital survey respondents reported that healthcare equipment was also challenged. Access to COVID-19 testing was one concern, with only 35% of respondents reporting availability for all patients at the beginning of the pandemic, and 56% reporting availability for only select patients based on symptom severity.1 Access to personal protective equipment (PPE) was also affected, with PPE always available according to 83% to 95% of respondents but just 35% having access to N95 masks.1 Additionally, 26% reported that there were no respirators in their hospital, and 11% reported limited ventilators.1 

Although resource depletion is a problem, studies have looked at public health measures that helped to mitigate this issue. With proper public health planning and implementation, such as physical distancing, aggressive testing, contact tracing, and increased hospital capacity, by freeing up existing resources or adding additional support, public health modeling showed that resources may be able to withstand the increase.13 Development of reallocation models at local, state, national, and international levels is an important step to be able to deal with future public health crises.14

The long-term impact from the pandemic includes disruption in the physical environment of healthcare, production, supply chain, staff structure, and workforce alterations.4 For example, the physical shape of healthcare facilities is changing to accommodate increasing volumes and decrease the risk of spreading disease.4 To accommodate the burden on staffing structure and workforce alteration, telehealth gained a prominent role.4 All in all, the pandemic has changed the healthcare system; however, institutions, organizations, and policy makers need to evaluate which measures were impactful and should be considered for long-term inclusion in healthcare practice. 

Impact on Other Diseases: Cancer, Heart Disease, Chronic Illnesses, and Other Viruses 

The treatment of other new and existing conditions has also been affected by the pandemic. Cancer, especially, is a disease of concern. Elective surgeries and screening were halted or altered during the pandemic, which is modeled to lead to higher cancer mortality in years to come.2 The most affected cancers were breast, lung, and colorectal cancer.2 A study of colorectal cancer screening showed that colonoscopies were delayed due to COVID-19 and that gastroenterology visits declined by 49% to 61%.15 This will likely lead to delayed cancer diagnoses and possible increases in mortality.15 Breast cancer screening was also delayed and many patients continued to avoid it for various reasons such as fears of contracting COVID-19 infection in healthcare facilities, and the economic effects of the pandemic such as job loss and healthcare coverage loss.16 These delays will result in an estimated potential 0.52% overall increase in breast cancer deaths by 2030.17

A study of 368 patients from Spain showed a 56.5% decrease in hospital admissions, usually related to heart attacks, in March and April of 2020, compared to January and February 2020.18,19 For other chronic illnesses, the pandemic resulted in decreased preventative care and management.20 The care of other infections similarly suffered. The World Health Organization announced that the number of patients receiving treatment for tuberculosis (TB) dropped by 1 million, setting the disease mitigation back considerably.20 An estimated 500,000 more people died in 2020 from TB.21 The drastic shift in focus to COVID-19 care during this period will continue to have a profound impact on other diseases like these for many years post-pandemic.

Provider Experience and Mental Health Outcomes 

The impact on provider experiences and mental health has been immense. One study of 510 healthcare providers (HCPs) and first responders found that occupational stress from the pandemic correlated with psychiatric symptoms, including depression, PTSD, insomnia, and generalized anxiety.3 Occupational stress also correlated with one’s likelihood to leave the medical field and trouble doing work they had once loved.3 Half of the healthcare workers surveyed indicated a decreased likelihood of staying in their current profession after the pandemic.3 

Other studies have also looked at specific subspecialties and impact on trainees during the pandemic. In neurosurgery, for example, resident burnout is high, at 26.1%.9 Additionally, the lack of surgeries in the pandemic made 65.8% of neurosurgery residents anxious about meeting career milestones.9 Respiratory therapists, a highly impacted group, also experienced burnout, reporting higher levels in those who worked more in the ICU. Another study identified several themes in the concerns reported by healthcare workers during the pandemic era including “changes in personal life and enhanced negative affect,” “gaining experience, normalization, and adaptation to the pandemic,” and “mental health considerations.”22 

Some studies have investigated ways to mitigate this dissatisfaction with the healthcare field post-pandemic. Intrapreneurship, reverse mentoring, and democratized learning all had a reported positive impact on employee experience and retention during this time.23 Intrapreneurship describes entrepreneurship within an existing organization, while reverse mentoring and democratized learning refer to newer employees teaching older employees and communicative learning on a breadth of topics. Other studies have examined the necessity of having mental health resources available, and that these resources need to be multi-stage and individualistic as well as specific to certain stressors HCPs faced during the pandemic.22 

Conclusion and Future Directions

The COVID-19 pandemic had stark effects on the healthcare system, impacting resources and capacity, care of other diseases, and provider mental health and experiences.1-3 After the chaos of the pandemic, many questions remain. What needs to be done now by health systems and HCPs? How can we learn from the challenges and the effects on capacity to change the healthcare workflow in times of crisis and in the present? How do we mitigate the impact of the pandemic on diagnosis and management of diseases? And how do we continue to provide healthcare workers with proper mental health and professional resources now, not just in times of stress, and encourage the future generation to pursue careers in healthcare? 

These are all the questions the pandemic has left us with, and more studies and initiatives are needed to investigate solutions to these issues. The COVID-19 pandemic left behind valuable lessons and changed the healthcare system, disease management, and staffing for many. Now is the time to pick up the pieces and strategize on how to make our existing system more effective for workers and patients post pandemic. 

References

  1. Wahlster S, Sharma M, Lewis AK, et al. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic's effect on critical care resources and health-care providers: a global survey. Chest. 2021;159(2):619-633. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2020.09.070

  2. Malagón T, Yong JHE, Tope P, Miller WH Jr, Franco EL; McGill task force on the impact of COVID-19 on cancer control and care. Predicted long-term impact of COVID-19 pandemic-related care delays on cancer mortality in Canada. Int J Cancer. 2022;150(8):1244-1254. doi:10.1002/ijc.33884

  3. Hendrickson RC, Slevin RA, Hoerster KD, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health, occupational functioning, and professional retention among health care workers and first responders. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(2):397-408. doi:10.1007/s11606-021-07252-z

  4. Davis B, Bankhead-Kendall BK, Dumas RP. A review of COVID-19's impact on modern medical systems from a health organization management perspective. Health Technol (Berl). 2022;12(4):815-824. doi:10.1007/s12553-022-00660-z

  5. Rosenbaum L. The untold toll - the pandemic's effects on patients without COVID-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(24):2368-2371. doi:10.1056/NEJMms2009984

  6. Hacker KA, Briss PA, Richardson L, Wright J, Petersen R. COVID-19 and chronic disease: the impact now and in the future. Prev Chronic Dis. 2021;18:E62. doi:10.5888/pcd18.210086

  7. Roberts L. How COVID hurt the fight against other dangerous diseases. Nature. 2021;592(7855):502-504. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-01022-x

  8. Jalili M, Niroomand M, Hadavand F, Zeinali K, Fotouhi A. Burnout among healthcare professionals during COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021;94(6):1345-1352. doi:10.1007/s00420-021-01695-x

  9. Khalafallah AM, Lam S, Gami A, et al. A national survey on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic upon burnout and career satisfaction among neurosurgery residents. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;80:137-142. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2020.08.012

  10. Miller AG, Roberts KJ, Smith BJ, et al. Prevalence of burnout among respiratory therapists amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Respir Care. 2021;respcare.09283. doi:10.4187/respcare.09283

  11. Frogner BK, Dill JS. Tracking turnover among health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. JAMA Health Forum. 2022;3(4):e220371. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0371

  12. CDC COVID data tracker. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed December 22, 2022. http://covid-data-tracker/#datatracker-home

  13. Barrett K, Khan YA, Mac S, Ximenes R, Naimark DMJ, Sander B. Estimation of COVID-19-induced depletion of hospital resources in Ontario, Canada. CMAJ. 2020;192(24):E640-E646. doi:10.1503/cmaj.200715

  14. Kaul V, Chahal J, Schrarstzhaupt IN, et al. Lessons learned from a global perspective of COVID-19. Clin Chest Med. 2022 Nov. 24. [online ahead of print]. doi:10.1016/j.ccm.2022.11.020

  15. Issaka RB, Somsouk M. Colorectal cancer screening and prevention in the COVID-19 Era. JAMA Health Forum. 2020;1(5):e200588. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.0588

  16. Freer PE. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast imaging. Radiol Clin North Am. 2021;59(1):1-11. doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2020.09.008

  17. Alagoz O, Lowry KP, Kurian AW, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer mortality in the US: estimates from collaborative simulation modeling. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021;113(11):1484-1494. doi:10.1093/jnci/djab097

  18. Jiménez-Blanco Bravo M, Cordero Pereda D, Sánchez Vega D, et al. Heart failure in the time of COVID-19. Cardiology. 2020;145(8):481-484. doi:10.1159/000509181

  19. Frankfurter C, Buchan TA, Kobulnik J, et al. Reduced rate of hospital presentations for heart failure during the COVID-19 pandemic in Toronto, Canada. Can J Cardiol. 2020;36(10):1680-1684. doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2020.07.006

  20. Hacker KA, Briss PA, Richardson L, Wright J, Petersen R. COVID-19 and chronic disease: The impact now and in the future. Prev Chronic Dis. 2021;18:E62. doi:10.5888/pcd18.210086

  21. Roberts L. How COVID hurt the fight against other dangerous diseases. Nature. 2021;592(7855):502-504. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-01022-x

  22. Eftekhar Ardebili M, Naserbakht M, Bernstein C, Alazmani-Noodeh F, Hakimi H, Ranjbar H. Healthcare providers experience of working during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. Am J Infect Control. 2021;49(5):547-554. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2020.10.001

  23. Jayathilake HD, Daud D, Eaw HC, Annuar N. Employee development and retention of generation-Z employees in the post-covid-19 workplace: a conceptual framework. Benchmarking: An International Journal. 2021;28(7):2343-2364. doi:10.1108/bij-06-2020-0311 


 

Author and Disclosure Information

Viren Kaul, MD, FCCP, FACP 

Division Chief, Pulmonary Medicine and Intensivist 
Crouse Health Clinical Assistant Professor of Medicine 
Upstate Medical University 

Syracuse, NY

Dr. Viren Kaul has no disclosures to report. 

Publications
Topics
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Viren Kaul, MD, FCCP, FACP 

Division Chief, Pulmonary Medicine and Intensivist 
Crouse Health Clinical Assistant Professor of Medicine 
Upstate Medical University 

Syracuse, NY

Dr. Viren Kaul has no disclosures to report. 

Author and Disclosure Information

Viren Kaul, MD, FCCP, FACP 

Division Chief, Pulmonary Medicine and Intensivist 
Crouse Health Clinical Assistant Professor of Medicine 
Upstate Medical University 

Syracuse, NY

Dr. Viren Kaul has no disclosures to report. 

 

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the healthcare system in a multitude of ways, affecting healthcare capacity, treatment of other illnesses, and wellness as well as professional retention of healthcare workers.1-3 During the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare capacity was tested and resources were used up quickly.1 As the pandemic has progressed, healthcare systems have had to decide how to proceed with lessons learned, reassessing the environment of care delivery, healthcare supply chains, workforce structures, communication systems, and scientific collaboration as well as policy frameworks in healthcare.4 

There have been both immediate effects and long-term consequences of the delay in care for other conditions.2,5 One stark example of this is in cancer care, where screening and procedures were postponed or canceled due to the pandemic with a resulting predicted 2% increase in cancer mortality in the next 10 years.2 The care of heart disease, chronic illnesses, and other viruses has also been similarly negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic due to similar delays in diagnosis and treatment.5-7 

The impact on healthcare workers has also been profound.3 Occupational stress from the pandemic has correlated with increased depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among other mental health diseases in healthcare workers.3 In a survey of neurosurgery residents, 26.1% of physicians reported feeling burnt out, and 65.8% were worried that they would not be able to reach surgical milestones.8,9 Among respiratory therapists, a hard hit group during this time, 79% reported burnout.10 Additionally, more healthcare workers left the field during the pandemic, with 15 million lost jobs. Future recovery of jobs looks bleak in some settings, like long-term care and among assistants and aides.11 Overall, the long-term outcomes of these resource, disease, and mental health disruptions need to be assessed and solutions created to maintain a quality and effective healthcare system, with ample resources and measures to account for disease increases and address the impact on providers. 

Healthcare Capacity and Resources 

With COVID-19 affecting over 100 million in the United States as of March 1, 2023, the impact on healthcare resources since the start of the pandemic has been immense.12 With 5% to 38% of hospitalized patients being admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and 75% to 88% of those patients requiring mechanical ventilation, a huge strain was placed on resources during and after the pandemic.1 

The question of balancing resources for other hospital needs while tending to patients with COVID-19 has been an ongoing discussion at many levels.1 One core resource concern is the lack of staff. In a survey of 77 different countries, including physicians (41%), nurses (40%), respiratory therapists (11%), and advanced practice providers (8%), 15% reported insufficient intensivists and 32% reported insufficient ICU nursing staff during March and April of 2020.1 A lack of hospital and care space that led to reallocation of limited-care acute care space was a concern. Thirteen percent reported a shortage of hospital ICU beds, while others reported the conversion of postoperative recovery rooms (20%) and operating rooms (12%) for patients with COVID-19.1 

Along with staff and care space concerns, hospital survey respondents reported that healthcare equipment was also challenged. Access to COVID-19 testing was one concern, with only 35% of respondents reporting availability for all patients at the beginning of the pandemic, and 56% reporting availability for only select patients based on symptom severity.1 Access to personal protective equipment (PPE) was also affected, with PPE always available according to 83% to 95% of respondents but just 35% having access to N95 masks.1 Additionally, 26% reported that there were no respirators in their hospital, and 11% reported limited ventilators.1 

Although resource depletion is a problem, studies have looked at public health measures that helped to mitigate this issue. With proper public health planning and implementation, such as physical distancing, aggressive testing, contact tracing, and increased hospital capacity, by freeing up existing resources or adding additional support, public health modeling showed that resources may be able to withstand the increase.13 Development of reallocation models at local, state, national, and international levels is an important step to be able to deal with future public health crises.14

The long-term impact from the pandemic includes disruption in the physical environment of healthcare, production, supply chain, staff structure, and workforce alterations.4 For example, the physical shape of healthcare facilities is changing to accommodate increasing volumes and decrease the risk of spreading disease.4 To accommodate the burden on staffing structure and workforce alteration, telehealth gained a prominent role.4 All in all, the pandemic has changed the healthcare system; however, institutions, organizations, and policy makers need to evaluate which measures were impactful and should be considered for long-term inclusion in healthcare practice. 

Impact on Other Diseases: Cancer, Heart Disease, Chronic Illnesses, and Other Viruses 

The treatment of other new and existing conditions has also been affected by the pandemic. Cancer, especially, is a disease of concern. Elective surgeries and screening were halted or altered during the pandemic, which is modeled to lead to higher cancer mortality in years to come.2 The most affected cancers were breast, lung, and colorectal cancer.2 A study of colorectal cancer screening showed that colonoscopies were delayed due to COVID-19 and that gastroenterology visits declined by 49% to 61%.15 This will likely lead to delayed cancer diagnoses and possible increases in mortality.15 Breast cancer screening was also delayed and many patients continued to avoid it for various reasons such as fears of contracting COVID-19 infection in healthcare facilities, and the economic effects of the pandemic such as job loss and healthcare coverage loss.16 These delays will result in an estimated potential 0.52% overall increase in breast cancer deaths by 2030.17

A study of 368 patients from Spain showed a 56.5% decrease in hospital admissions, usually related to heart attacks, in March and April of 2020, compared to January and February 2020.18,19 For other chronic illnesses, the pandemic resulted in decreased preventative care and management.20 The care of other infections similarly suffered. The World Health Organization announced that the number of patients receiving treatment for tuberculosis (TB) dropped by 1 million, setting the disease mitigation back considerably.20 An estimated 500,000 more people died in 2020 from TB.21 The drastic shift in focus to COVID-19 care during this period will continue to have a profound impact on other diseases like these for many years post-pandemic.

Provider Experience and Mental Health Outcomes 

The impact on provider experiences and mental health has been immense. One study of 510 healthcare providers (HCPs) and first responders found that occupational stress from the pandemic correlated with psychiatric symptoms, including depression, PTSD, insomnia, and generalized anxiety.3 Occupational stress also correlated with one’s likelihood to leave the medical field and trouble doing work they had once loved.3 Half of the healthcare workers surveyed indicated a decreased likelihood of staying in their current profession after the pandemic.3 

Other studies have also looked at specific subspecialties and impact on trainees during the pandemic. In neurosurgery, for example, resident burnout is high, at 26.1%.9 Additionally, the lack of surgeries in the pandemic made 65.8% of neurosurgery residents anxious about meeting career milestones.9 Respiratory therapists, a highly impacted group, also experienced burnout, reporting higher levels in those who worked more in the ICU. Another study identified several themes in the concerns reported by healthcare workers during the pandemic era including “changes in personal life and enhanced negative affect,” “gaining experience, normalization, and adaptation to the pandemic,” and “mental health considerations.”22 

Some studies have investigated ways to mitigate this dissatisfaction with the healthcare field post-pandemic. Intrapreneurship, reverse mentoring, and democratized learning all had a reported positive impact on employee experience and retention during this time.23 Intrapreneurship describes entrepreneurship within an existing organization, while reverse mentoring and democratized learning refer to newer employees teaching older employees and communicative learning on a breadth of topics. Other studies have examined the necessity of having mental health resources available, and that these resources need to be multi-stage and individualistic as well as specific to certain stressors HCPs faced during the pandemic.22 

Conclusion and Future Directions

The COVID-19 pandemic had stark effects on the healthcare system, impacting resources and capacity, care of other diseases, and provider mental health and experiences.1-3 After the chaos of the pandemic, many questions remain. What needs to be done now by health systems and HCPs? How can we learn from the challenges and the effects on capacity to change the healthcare workflow in times of crisis and in the present? How do we mitigate the impact of the pandemic on diagnosis and management of diseases? And how do we continue to provide healthcare workers with proper mental health and professional resources now, not just in times of stress, and encourage the future generation to pursue careers in healthcare? 

These are all the questions the pandemic has left us with, and more studies and initiatives are needed to investigate solutions to these issues. The COVID-19 pandemic left behind valuable lessons and changed the healthcare system, disease management, and staffing for many. Now is the time to pick up the pieces and strategize on how to make our existing system more effective for workers and patients post pandemic. 

 

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the healthcare system in a multitude of ways, affecting healthcare capacity, treatment of other illnesses, and wellness as well as professional retention of healthcare workers.1-3 During the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare capacity was tested and resources were used up quickly.1 As the pandemic has progressed, healthcare systems have had to decide how to proceed with lessons learned, reassessing the environment of care delivery, healthcare supply chains, workforce structures, communication systems, and scientific collaboration as well as policy frameworks in healthcare.4 

There have been both immediate effects and long-term consequences of the delay in care for other conditions.2,5 One stark example of this is in cancer care, where screening and procedures were postponed or canceled due to the pandemic with a resulting predicted 2% increase in cancer mortality in the next 10 years.2 The care of heart disease, chronic illnesses, and other viruses has also been similarly negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic due to similar delays in diagnosis and treatment.5-7 

The impact on healthcare workers has also been profound.3 Occupational stress from the pandemic has correlated with increased depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among other mental health diseases in healthcare workers.3 In a survey of neurosurgery residents, 26.1% of physicians reported feeling burnt out, and 65.8% were worried that they would not be able to reach surgical milestones.8,9 Among respiratory therapists, a hard hit group during this time, 79% reported burnout.10 Additionally, more healthcare workers left the field during the pandemic, with 15 million lost jobs. Future recovery of jobs looks bleak in some settings, like long-term care and among assistants and aides.11 Overall, the long-term outcomes of these resource, disease, and mental health disruptions need to be assessed and solutions created to maintain a quality and effective healthcare system, with ample resources and measures to account for disease increases and address the impact on providers. 

Healthcare Capacity and Resources 

With COVID-19 affecting over 100 million in the United States as of March 1, 2023, the impact on healthcare resources since the start of the pandemic has been immense.12 With 5% to 38% of hospitalized patients being admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and 75% to 88% of those patients requiring mechanical ventilation, a huge strain was placed on resources during and after the pandemic.1 

The question of balancing resources for other hospital needs while tending to patients with COVID-19 has been an ongoing discussion at many levels.1 One core resource concern is the lack of staff. In a survey of 77 different countries, including physicians (41%), nurses (40%), respiratory therapists (11%), and advanced practice providers (8%), 15% reported insufficient intensivists and 32% reported insufficient ICU nursing staff during March and April of 2020.1 A lack of hospital and care space that led to reallocation of limited-care acute care space was a concern. Thirteen percent reported a shortage of hospital ICU beds, while others reported the conversion of postoperative recovery rooms (20%) and operating rooms (12%) for patients with COVID-19.1 

Along with staff and care space concerns, hospital survey respondents reported that healthcare equipment was also challenged. Access to COVID-19 testing was one concern, with only 35% of respondents reporting availability for all patients at the beginning of the pandemic, and 56% reporting availability for only select patients based on symptom severity.1 Access to personal protective equipment (PPE) was also affected, with PPE always available according to 83% to 95% of respondents but just 35% having access to N95 masks.1 Additionally, 26% reported that there were no respirators in their hospital, and 11% reported limited ventilators.1 

Although resource depletion is a problem, studies have looked at public health measures that helped to mitigate this issue. With proper public health planning and implementation, such as physical distancing, aggressive testing, contact tracing, and increased hospital capacity, by freeing up existing resources or adding additional support, public health modeling showed that resources may be able to withstand the increase.13 Development of reallocation models at local, state, national, and international levels is an important step to be able to deal with future public health crises.14

The long-term impact from the pandemic includes disruption in the physical environment of healthcare, production, supply chain, staff structure, and workforce alterations.4 For example, the physical shape of healthcare facilities is changing to accommodate increasing volumes and decrease the risk of spreading disease.4 To accommodate the burden on staffing structure and workforce alteration, telehealth gained a prominent role.4 All in all, the pandemic has changed the healthcare system; however, institutions, organizations, and policy makers need to evaluate which measures were impactful and should be considered for long-term inclusion in healthcare practice. 

Impact on Other Diseases: Cancer, Heart Disease, Chronic Illnesses, and Other Viruses 

The treatment of other new and existing conditions has also been affected by the pandemic. Cancer, especially, is a disease of concern. Elective surgeries and screening were halted or altered during the pandemic, which is modeled to lead to higher cancer mortality in years to come.2 The most affected cancers were breast, lung, and colorectal cancer.2 A study of colorectal cancer screening showed that colonoscopies were delayed due to COVID-19 and that gastroenterology visits declined by 49% to 61%.15 This will likely lead to delayed cancer diagnoses and possible increases in mortality.15 Breast cancer screening was also delayed and many patients continued to avoid it for various reasons such as fears of contracting COVID-19 infection in healthcare facilities, and the economic effects of the pandemic such as job loss and healthcare coverage loss.16 These delays will result in an estimated potential 0.52% overall increase in breast cancer deaths by 2030.17

A study of 368 patients from Spain showed a 56.5% decrease in hospital admissions, usually related to heart attacks, in March and April of 2020, compared to January and February 2020.18,19 For other chronic illnesses, the pandemic resulted in decreased preventative care and management.20 The care of other infections similarly suffered. The World Health Organization announced that the number of patients receiving treatment for tuberculosis (TB) dropped by 1 million, setting the disease mitigation back considerably.20 An estimated 500,000 more people died in 2020 from TB.21 The drastic shift in focus to COVID-19 care during this period will continue to have a profound impact on other diseases like these for many years post-pandemic.

Provider Experience and Mental Health Outcomes 

The impact on provider experiences and mental health has been immense. One study of 510 healthcare providers (HCPs) and first responders found that occupational stress from the pandemic correlated with psychiatric symptoms, including depression, PTSD, insomnia, and generalized anxiety.3 Occupational stress also correlated with one’s likelihood to leave the medical field and trouble doing work they had once loved.3 Half of the healthcare workers surveyed indicated a decreased likelihood of staying in their current profession after the pandemic.3 

Other studies have also looked at specific subspecialties and impact on trainees during the pandemic. In neurosurgery, for example, resident burnout is high, at 26.1%.9 Additionally, the lack of surgeries in the pandemic made 65.8% of neurosurgery residents anxious about meeting career milestones.9 Respiratory therapists, a highly impacted group, also experienced burnout, reporting higher levels in those who worked more in the ICU. Another study identified several themes in the concerns reported by healthcare workers during the pandemic era including “changes in personal life and enhanced negative affect,” “gaining experience, normalization, and adaptation to the pandemic,” and “mental health considerations.”22 

Some studies have investigated ways to mitigate this dissatisfaction with the healthcare field post-pandemic. Intrapreneurship, reverse mentoring, and democratized learning all had a reported positive impact on employee experience and retention during this time.23 Intrapreneurship describes entrepreneurship within an existing organization, while reverse mentoring and democratized learning refer to newer employees teaching older employees and communicative learning on a breadth of topics. Other studies have examined the necessity of having mental health resources available, and that these resources need to be multi-stage and individualistic as well as specific to certain stressors HCPs faced during the pandemic.22 

Conclusion and Future Directions

The COVID-19 pandemic had stark effects on the healthcare system, impacting resources and capacity, care of other diseases, and provider mental health and experiences.1-3 After the chaos of the pandemic, many questions remain. What needs to be done now by health systems and HCPs? How can we learn from the challenges and the effects on capacity to change the healthcare workflow in times of crisis and in the present? How do we mitigate the impact of the pandemic on diagnosis and management of diseases? And how do we continue to provide healthcare workers with proper mental health and professional resources now, not just in times of stress, and encourage the future generation to pursue careers in healthcare? 

These are all the questions the pandemic has left us with, and more studies and initiatives are needed to investigate solutions to these issues. The COVID-19 pandemic left behind valuable lessons and changed the healthcare system, disease management, and staffing for many. Now is the time to pick up the pieces and strategize on how to make our existing system more effective for workers and patients post pandemic. 

References

  1. Wahlster S, Sharma M, Lewis AK, et al. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic's effect on critical care resources and health-care providers: a global survey. Chest. 2021;159(2):619-633. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2020.09.070

  2. Malagón T, Yong JHE, Tope P, Miller WH Jr, Franco EL; McGill task force on the impact of COVID-19 on cancer control and care. Predicted long-term impact of COVID-19 pandemic-related care delays on cancer mortality in Canada. Int J Cancer. 2022;150(8):1244-1254. doi:10.1002/ijc.33884

  3. Hendrickson RC, Slevin RA, Hoerster KD, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health, occupational functioning, and professional retention among health care workers and first responders. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(2):397-408. doi:10.1007/s11606-021-07252-z

  4. Davis B, Bankhead-Kendall BK, Dumas RP. A review of COVID-19's impact on modern medical systems from a health organization management perspective. Health Technol (Berl). 2022;12(4):815-824. doi:10.1007/s12553-022-00660-z

  5. Rosenbaum L. The untold toll - the pandemic's effects on patients without COVID-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(24):2368-2371. doi:10.1056/NEJMms2009984

  6. Hacker KA, Briss PA, Richardson L, Wright J, Petersen R. COVID-19 and chronic disease: the impact now and in the future. Prev Chronic Dis. 2021;18:E62. doi:10.5888/pcd18.210086

  7. Roberts L. How COVID hurt the fight against other dangerous diseases. Nature. 2021;592(7855):502-504. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-01022-x

  8. Jalili M, Niroomand M, Hadavand F, Zeinali K, Fotouhi A. Burnout among healthcare professionals during COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021;94(6):1345-1352. doi:10.1007/s00420-021-01695-x

  9. Khalafallah AM, Lam S, Gami A, et al. A national survey on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic upon burnout and career satisfaction among neurosurgery residents. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;80:137-142. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2020.08.012

  10. Miller AG, Roberts KJ, Smith BJ, et al. Prevalence of burnout among respiratory therapists amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Respir Care. 2021;respcare.09283. doi:10.4187/respcare.09283

  11. Frogner BK, Dill JS. Tracking turnover among health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. JAMA Health Forum. 2022;3(4):e220371. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0371

  12. CDC COVID data tracker. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed December 22, 2022. http://covid-data-tracker/#datatracker-home

  13. Barrett K, Khan YA, Mac S, Ximenes R, Naimark DMJ, Sander B. Estimation of COVID-19-induced depletion of hospital resources in Ontario, Canada. CMAJ. 2020;192(24):E640-E646. doi:10.1503/cmaj.200715

  14. Kaul V, Chahal J, Schrarstzhaupt IN, et al. Lessons learned from a global perspective of COVID-19. Clin Chest Med. 2022 Nov. 24. [online ahead of print]. doi:10.1016/j.ccm.2022.11.020

  15. Issaka RB, Somsouk M. Colorectal cancer screening and prevention in the COVID-19 Era. JAMA Health Forum. 2020;1(5):e200588. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.0588

  16. Freer PE. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast imaging. Radiol Clin North Am. 2021;59(1):1-11. doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2020.09.008

  17. Alagoz O, Lowry KP, Kurian AW, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer mortality in the US: estimates from collaborative simulation modeling. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021;113(11):1484-1494. doi:10.1093/jnci/djab097

  18. Jiménez-Blanco Bravo M, Cordero Pereda D, Sánchez Vega D, et al. Heart failure in the time of COVID-19. Cardiology. 2020;145(8):481-484. doi:10.1159/000509181

  19. Frankfurter C, Buchan TA, Kobulnik J, et al. Reduced rate of hospital presentations for heart failure during the COVID-19 pandemic in Toronto, Canada. Can J Cardiol. 2020;36(10):1680-1684. doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2020.07.006

  20. Hacker KA, Briss PA, Richardson L, Wright J, Petersen R. COVID-19 and chronic disease: The impact now and in the future. Prev Chronic Dis. 2021;18:E62. doi:10.5888/pcd18.210086

  21. Roberts L. How COVID hurt the fight against other dangerous diseases. Nature. 2021;592(7855):502-504. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-01022-x

  22. Eftekhar Ardebili M, Naserbakht M, Bernstein C, Alazmani-Noodeh F, Hakimi H, Ranjbar H. Healthcare providers experience of working during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. Am J Infect Control. 2021;49(5):547-554. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2020.10.001

  23. Jayathilake HD, Daud D, Eaw HC, Annuar N. Employee development and retention of generation-Z employees in the post-covid-19 workplace: a conceptual framework. Benchmarking: An International Journal. 2021;28(7):2343-2364. doi:10.1108/bij-06-2020-0311 


 

References

  1. Wahlster S, Sharma M, Lewis AK, et al. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic's effect on critical care resources and health-care providers: a global survey. Chest. 2021;159(2):619-633. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2020.09.070

  2. Malagón T, Yong JHE, Tope P, Miller WH Jr, Franco EL; McGill task force on the impact of COVID-19 on cancer control and care. Predicted long-term impact of COVID-19 pandemic-related care delays on cancer mortality in Canada. Int J Cancer. 2022;150(8):1244-1254. doi:10.1002/ijc.33884

  3. Hendrickson RC, Slevin RA, Hoerster KD, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health, occupational functioning, and professional retention among health care workers and first responders. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(2):397-408. doi:10.1007/s11606-021-07252-z

  4. Davis B, Bankhead-Kendall BK, Dumas RP. A review of COVID-19's impact on modern medical systems from a health organization management perspective. Health Technol (Berl). 2022;12(4):815-824. doi:10.1007/s12553-022-00660-z

  5. Rosenbaum L. The untold toll - the pandemic's effects on patients without COVID-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(24):2368-2371. doi:10.1056/NEJMms2009984

  6. Hacker KA, Briss PA, Richardson L, Wright J, Petersen R. COVID-19 and chronic disease: the impact now and in the future. Prev Chronic Dis. 2021;18:E62. doi:10.5888/pcd18.210086

  7. Roberts L. How COVID hurt the fight against other dangerous diseases. Nature. 2021;592(7855):502-504. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-01022-x

  8. Jalili M, Niroomand M, Hadavand F, Zeinali K, Fotouhi A. Burnout among healthcare professionals during COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021;94(6):1345-1352. doi:10.1007/s00420-021-01695-x

  9. Khalafallah AM, Lam S, Gami A, et al. A national survey on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic upon burnout and career satisfaction among neurosurgery residents. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;80:137-142. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2020.08.012

  10. Miller AG, Roberts KJ, Smith BJ, et al. Prevalence of burnout among respiratory therapists amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Respir Care. 2021;respcare.09283. doi:10.4187/respcare.09283

  11. Frogner BK, Dill JS. Tracking turnover among health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. JAMA Health Forum. 2022;3(4):e220371. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0371

  12. CDC COVID data tracker. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed December 22, 2022. http://covid-data-tracker/#datatracker-home

  13. Barrett K, Khan YA, Mac S, Ximenes R, Naimark DMJ, Sander B. Estimation of COVID-19-induced depletion of hospital resources in Ontario, Canada. CMAJ. 2020;192(24):E640-E646. doi:10.1503/cmaj.200715

  14. Kaul V, Chahal J, Schrarstzhaupt IN, et al. Lessons learned from a global perspective of COVID-19. Clin Chest Med. 2022 Nov. 24. [online ahead of print]. doi:10.1016/j.ccm.2022.11.020

  15. Issaka RB, Somsouk M. Colorectal cancer screening and prevention in the COVID-19 Era. JAMA Health Forum. 2020;1(5):e200588. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.0588

  16. Freer PE. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast imaging. Radiol Clin North Am. 2021;59(1):1-11. doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2020.09.008

  17. Alagoz O, Lowry KP, Kurian AW, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer mortality in the US: estimates from collaborative simulation modeling. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021;113(11):1484-1494. doi:10.1093/jnci/djab097

  18. Jiménez-Blanco Bravo M, Cordero Pereda D, Sánchez Vega D, et al. Heart failure in the time of COVID-19. Cardiology. 2020;145(8):481-484. doi:10.1159/000509181

  19. Frankfurter C, Buchan TA, Kobulnik J, et al. Reduced rate of hospital presentations for heart failure during the COVID-19 pandemic in Toronto, Canada. Can J Cardiol. 2020;36(10):1680-1684. doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2020.07.006

  20. Hacker KA, Briss PA, Richardson L, Wright J, Petersen R. COVID-19 and chronic disease: The impact now and in the future. Prev Chronic Dis. 2021;18:E62. doi:10.5888/pcd18.210086

  21. Roberts L. How COVID hurt the fight against other dangerous diseases. Nature. 2021;592(7855):502-504. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-01022-x

  22. Eftekhar Ardebili M, Naserbakht M, Bernstein C, Alazmani-Noodeh F, Hakimi H, Ranjbar H. Healthcare providers experience of working during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. Am J Infect Control. 2021;49(5):547-554. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2020.10.001

  23. Jayathilake HD, Daud D, Eaw HC, Annuar N. Employee development and retention of generation-Z employees in the post-covid-19 workplace: a conceptual framework. Benchmarking: An International Journal. 2021;28(7):2343-2364. doi:10.1108/bij-06-2020-0311 


 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Wed, 03/08/2023 - 12:30
Un-Gate On Date
Wed, 03/08/2023 - 12:30
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Wed, 03/08/2023 - 12:30
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article