User login
We tend to take successful gestation for granted. We understand the adverse fetal effects of environmental and genetic influences and infection, as well as the effects of diseases such as chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and pulmonary hypertension. But some disorders, such as preeclampsia and the HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count associated with preeclampsia), dramatically and uniquely affect the apparently healthy pregnant woman and thus require prompt recognition and treatment. Yet, despite their severity, their pathophysiology eludes our full understanding, and they tend to be underrepresented in our internal medicine curricula.
In this issue, Ramaraj and Sorrell discuss another enigma of maternal-fetal medicine, peripartum cardiomyopathy—a condition with significant heterogeneity in outcome and, likely, several triggers. But the variability of recurrence in subsequent pregnancy (even if cardiac function recovers from the first episode) argues that peripartum cardiomyopathy is not simply the effect of the cardiovascular stress of pregnancy on occult left ventricular dysfunction. This variability of recurrence also argues against a primary autoimmune mechanism, as does the observation that other autoimmune diseases often go into remission during pregnancy (but may flare postpartum). The higher incidence in African Americans and particularly in Haitians argues for some genetic contribution, and yet the variable rate of recurrence also challenges “bad genes” as the sole explanation.
Although the authors discuss diagnostic tests, peripartum cardiomyopathy still primarily requires astute clinical recognition with exclusion of other causes of acute heart failure. Thus, despite its low prevalence in the United States, this potentially fatal condition is worth reviewing. It is too tempting to attribute the early signs and symptoms of heart failure (dyspnea, edema, fatigue) to “just” the late stages of pregnancy.
We tend to take successful gestation for granted. We understand the adverse fetal effects of environmental and genetic influences and infection, as well as the effects of diseases such as chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and pulmonary hypertension. But some disorders, such as preeclampsia and the HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count associated with preeclampsia), dramatically and uniquely affect the apparently healthy pregnant woman and thus require prompt recognition and treatment. Yet, despite their severity, their pathophysiology eludes our full understanding, and they tend to be underrepresented in our internal medicine curricula.
In this issue, Ramaraj and Sorrell discuss another enigma of maternal-fetal medicine, peripartum cardiomyopathy—a condition with significant heterogeneity in outcome and, likely, several triggers. But the variability of recurrence in subsequent pregnancy (even if cardiac function recovers from the first episode) argues that peripartum cardiomyopathy is not simply the effect of the cardiovascular stress of pregnancy on occult left ventricular dysfunction. This variability of recurrence also argues against a primary autoimmune mechanism, as does the observation that other autoimmune diseases often go into remission during pregnancy (but may flare postpartum). The higher incidence in African Americans and particularly in Haitians argues for some genetic contribution, and yet the variable rate of recurrence also challenges “bad genes” as the sole explanation.
Although the authors discuss diagnostic tests, peripartum cardiomyopathy still primarily requires astute clinical recognition with exclusion of other causes of acute heart failure. Thus, despite its low prevalence in the United States, this potentially fatal condition is worth reviewing. It is too tempting to attribute the early signs and symptoms of heart failure (dyspnea, edema, fatigue) to “just” the late stages of pregnancy.
We tend to take successful gestation for granted. We understand the adverse fetal effects of environmental and genetic influences and infection, as well as the effects of diseases such as chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and pulmonary hypertension. But some disorders, such as preeclampsia and the HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count associated with preeclampsia), dramatically and uniquely affect the apparently healthy pregnant woman and thus require prompt recognition and treatment. Yet, despite their severity, their pathophysiology eludes our full understanding, and they tend to be underrepresented in our internal medicine curricula.
In this issue, Ramaraj and Sorrell discuss another enigma of maternal-fetal medicine, peripartum cardiomyopathy—a condition with significant heterogeneity in outcome and, likely, several triggers. But the variability of recurrence in subsequent pregnancy (even if cardiac function recovers from the first episode) argues that peripartum cardiomyopathy is not simply the effect of the cardiovascular stress of pregnancy on occult left ventricular dysfunction. This variability of recurrence also argues against a primary autoimmune mechanism, as does the observation that other autoimmune diseases often go into remission during pregnancy (but may flare postpartum). The higher incidence in African Americans and particularly in Haitians argues for some genetic contribution, and yet the variable rate of recurrence also challenges “bad genes” as the sole explanation.
Although the authors discuss diagnostic tests, peripartum cardiomyopathy still primarily requires astute clinical recognition with exclusion of other causes of acute heart failure. Thus, despite its low prevalence in the United States, this potentially fatal condition is worth reviewing. It is too tempting to attribute the early signs and symptoms of heart failure (dyspnea, edema, fatigue) to “just” the late stages of pregnancy.