Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/04/2023 - 17:24

Key clinical point: Switch to maintenance endocrine therapy (ET)+bevacizumab with an option of reinduction may be a better alternative to continuing weekly paclitaxel+bevacizumab in patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) advanced/metastatic breast cancer (BC) who responded to paclitaxel+bevacizumab.

Major finding: After a median follow-up of 21.3 months, the time to failure of the  strategy was longer with ET+bevacizumab vs weekly paclitaxel+bevacizumab among all induction chemotherapy responders (hazard ratio 0.51; log-rank P = .0006). The incidence of grade 3-5 adverse events was 10% lower in the ET+bevacizumab group.

Study details: Findings are from the phase 2, BOOSTER trial including 160 chemotherapy naive patients with ER+/HER2− advanced/metastatic BC who responded to weekly paclitaxel+bevacizumab induction, and were randomly assigned to continue paclitaxel+bevacizumab or switch to ET+bevacizumab.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Chugai Pharmaceutical. Some authors declared contracting clinical trials, serving as board members, or receiving institutional grants, honoraria, or personal fees from several sources.

Source: Saji S et al. Switch maintenance endocrine therapy plus bevacizumab after bevacizumab plus paclitaxel in advanced or metastatic oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (BOOSTER): A randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(5):636-649 (Apr 8). Doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00196-6

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Switch to maintenance endocrine therapy (ET)+bevacizumab with an option of reinduction may be a better alternative to continuing weekly paclitaxel+bevacizumab in patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) advanced/metastatic breast cancer (BC) who responded to paclitaxel+bevacizumab.

Major finding: After a median follow-up of 21.3 months, the time to failure of the  strategy was longer with ET+bevacizumab vs weekly paclitaxel+bevacizumab among all induction chemotherapy responders (hazard ratio 0.51; log-rank P = .0006). The incidence of grade 3-5 adverse events was 10% lower in the ET+bevacizumab group.

Study details: Findings are from the phase 2, BOOSTER trial including 160 chemotherapy naive patients with ER+/HER2− advanced/metastatic BC who responded to weekly paclitaxel+bevacizumab induction, and were randomly assigned to continue paclitaxel+bevacizumab or switch to ET+bevacizumab.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Chugai Pharmaceutical. Some authors declared contracting clinical trials, serving as board members, or receiving institutional grants, honoraria, or personal fees from several sources.

Source: Saji S et al. Switch maintenance endocrine therapy plus bevacizumab after bevacizumab plus paclitaxel in advanced or metastatic oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (BOOSTER): A randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(5):636-649 (Apr 8). Doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00196-6

 

Key clinical point: Switch to maintenance endocrine therapy (ET)+bevacizumab with an option of reinduction may be a better alternative to continuing weekly paclitaxel+bevacizumab in patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) advanced/metastatic breast cancer (BC) who responded to paclitaxel+bevacizumab.

Major finding: After a median follow-up of 21.3 months, the time to failure of the  strategy was longer with ET+bevacizumab vs weekly paclitaxel+bevacizumab among all induction chemotherapy responders (hazard ratio 0.51; log-rank P = .0006). The incidence of grade 3-5 adverse events was 10% lower in the ET+bevacizumab group.

Study details: Findings are from the phase 2, BOOSTER trial including 160 chemotherapy naive patients with ER+/HER2− advanced/metastatic BC who responded to weekly paclitaxel+bevacizumab induction, and were randomly assigned to continue paclitaxel+bevacizumab or switch to ET+bevacizumab.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Chugai Pharmaceutical. Some authors declared contracting clinical trials, serving as board members, or receiving institutional grants, honoraria, or personal fees from several sources.

Source: Saji S et al. Switch maintenance endocrine therapy plus bevacizumab after bevacizumab plus paclitaxel in advanced or metastatic oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (BOOSTER): A randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(5):636-649 (Apr 8). Doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00196-6

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Breast Cancer June 2022
Gate On Date
Tue, 06/22/2021 - 11:15
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 06/22/2021 - 11:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 06/22/2021 - 11:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Activity Salesforce Deliverable ID
329444.1
Activity ID
77844
Product Name
Clinical Edge Journal Scan
Product ID
124
Supporter Name /ID
Kadcyla [ 3564 ]