User login
Buy our EHR. Come to a dinner and see our EHR. Our EHR is the best.
I hear that a lot, but am not rushing out to get one. Yes, I have an EHR, but it’s one I designed myself. It works very well for my dinky little practice, and I’m happy with it.
I get notes from practices that use commercial EHRs all the time. They’re usually a pile of gobbledygook, mixing labs, vital signs, medication lists, and ICD-10 codes that tell you absolutely nothing about the patient or the physician’s thought process.
Recently, while reviewing malpractice cases, I saw some where I thought that the EHR was contributing to the problem. Medication lists that showed everything a patient had ever taken, without showing when some were discontinued. Prescribing lists that allowed you to enter only certain doses or schedules, therefore blocking the physician from tailoring them to a specific person’s needs. Physical exam forms that allowed only positive or negative answers, with nowhere to comment on unusual findings.
Of course, I’m just one person, so I thought “maybe it’s just me.” After all, a lot of practices out there use EHRs.
But apparently I’m not the only one. A recent report by one of the nation’s largest doctor-owned malpractice companies found that EHRs may increase the risks of liability and medical errors. In 2013, The Doctor’s Company found 28 closed claims where the EHR contributed, and 26 in just the first half of 2014.
These include both technological problems with the systems and human error in their use. Troubles included erroneous medication dose and schedules, diagnosis-related errors, and the sadly common pitfall of cutting and pasting previous notes without modification.
Medicine has always been, and will always be, a thinking profession, and trying to have computers take part of this job off of us is never good. EHRs, while they have advantages in convenience and space savings, are as imperfect as those who write them.
Patients are not one-size-fits-all, and individual treatments have to be customized in ways that current systems often don’t recognize, sometimes with sad consequences for all involved.
Dr. Block has a solo neurology practice in Scottsdale, Ariz.
Buy our EHR. Come to a dinner and see our EHR. Our EHR is the best.
I hear that a lot, but am not rushing out to get one. Yes, I have an EHR, but it’s one I designed myself. It works very well for my dinky little practice, and I’m happy with it.
I get notes from practices that use commercial EHRs all the time. They’re usually a pile of gobbledygook, mixing labs, vital signs, medication lists, and ICD-10 codes that tell you absolutely nothing about the patient or the physician’s thought process.
Recently, while reviewing malpractice cases, I saw some where I thought that the EHR was contributing to the problem. Medication lists that showed everything a patient had ever taken, without showing when some were discontinued. Prescribing lists that allowed you to enter only certain doses or schedules, therefore blocking the physician from tailoring them to a specific person’s needs. Physical exam forms that allowed only positive or negative answers, with nowhere to comment on unusual findings.
Of course, I’m just one person, so I thought “maybe it’s just me.” After all, a lot of practices out there use EHRs.
But apparently I’m not the only one. A recent report by one of the nation’s largest doctor-owned malpractice companies found that EHRs may increase the risks of liability and medical errors. In 2013, The Doctor’s Company found 28 closed claims where the EHR contributed, and 26 in just the first half of 2014.
These include both technological problems with the systems and human error in their use. Troubles included erroneous medication dose and schedules, diagnosis-related errors, and the sadly common pitfall of cutting and pasting previous notes without modification.
Medicine has always been, and will always be, a thinking profession, and trying to have computers take part of this job off of us is never good. EHRs, while they have advantages in convenience and space savings, are as imperfect as those who write them.
Patients are not one-size-fits-all, and individual treatments have to be customized in ways that current systems often don’t recognize, sometimes with sad consequences for all involved.
Dr. Block has a solo neurology practice in Scottsdale, Ariz.
Buy our EHR. Come to a dinner and see our EHR. Our EHR is the best.
I hear that a lot, but am not rushing out to get one. Yes, I have an EHR, but it’s one I designed myself. It works very well for my dinky little practice, and I’m happy with it.
I get notes from practices that use commercial EHRs all the time. They’re usually a pile of gobbledygook, mixing labs, vital signs, medication lists, and ICD-10 codes that tell you absolutely nothing about the patient or the physician’s thought process.
Recently, while reviewing malpractice cases, I saw some where I thought that the EHR was contributing to the problem. Medication lists that showed everything a patient had ever taken, without showing when some were discontinued. Prescribing lists that allowed you to enter only certain doses or schedules, therefore blocking the physician from tailoring them to a specific person’s needs. Physical exam forms that allowed only positive or negative answers, with nowhere to comment on unusual findings.
Of course, I’m just one person, so I thought “maybe it’s just me.” After all, a lot of practices out there use EHRs.
But apparently I’m not the only one. A recent report by one of the nation’s largest doctor-owned malpractice companies found that EHRs may increase the risks of liability and medical errors. In 2013, The Doctor’s Company found 28 closed claims where the EHR contributed, and 26 in just the first half of 2014.
These include both technological problems with the systems and human error in their use. Troubles included erroneous medication dose and schedules, diagnosis-related errors, and the sadly common pitfall of cutting and pasting previous notes without modification.
Medicine has always been, and will always be, a thinking profession, and trying to have computers take part of this job off of us is never good. EHRs, while they have advantages in convenience and space savings, are as imperfect as those who write them.
Patients are not one-size-fits-all, and individual treatments have to be customized in ways that current systems often don’t recognize, sometimes with sad consequences for all involved.
Dr. Block has a solo neurology practice in Scottsdale, Ariz.
