Article Type
Changed
Fri, 10/15/2021 - 23:02

Key clinical point: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who initiated trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) had better tumor response and disease control than those who initiated regorafenib.

Major finding: Patients who initiated FTD/TPI vs regorafenib as index therapy had better real-world overall response rate (odds ratio [OR], 2.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-4.80) and real-world disease control (OR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.36-4.68). Overall, a similar proportion of patients treated with FTD/TPI and regorafenib discontinued treatment because of disease progression (P = .162), but discontinuation because of toxicity/intolerance was significantly lower with FTD/TPI than regorafenib (8.2% vs 24.2%; P < .001).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective study of patients with mCRC who initiated FTD/TPI (n=126) or regorafenib (n=95) at a US tertiary oncology center.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Taiho Oncology Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA. No conflict of interests was disclosed.

Source: Patel AK et al. Oncologist. 2021 Aug 18. doi: 10.1002/onco.13942.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who initiated trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) had better tumor response and disease control than those who initiated regorafenib.

Major finding: Patients who initiated FTD/TPI vs regorafenib as index therapy had better real-world overall response rate (odds ratio [OR], 2.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-4.80) and real-world disease control (OR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.36-4.68). Overall, a similar proportion of patients treated with FTD/TPI and regorafenib discontinued treatment because of disease progression (P = .162), but discontinuation because of toxicity/intolerance was significantly lower with FTD/TPI than regorafenib (8.2% vs 24.2%; P < .001).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective study of patients with mCRC who initiated FTD/TPI (n=126) or regorafenib (n=95) at a US tertiary oncology center.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Taiho Oncology Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA. No conflict of interests was disclosed.

Source: Patel AK et al. Oncologist. 2021 Aug 18. doi: 10.1002/onco.13942.

Key clinical point: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who initiated trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) had better tumor response and disease control than those who initiated regorafenib.

Major finding: Patients who initiated FTD/TPI vs regorafenib as index therapy had better real-world overall response rate (odds ratio [OR], 2.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-4.80) and real-world disease control (OR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.36-4.68). Overall, a similar proportion of patients treated with FTD/TPI and regorafenib discontinued treatment because of disease progression (P = .162), but discontinuation because of toxicity/intolerance was significantly lower with FTD/TPI than regorafenib (8.2% vs 24.2%; P < .001).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective study of patients with mCRC who initiated FTD/TPI (n=126) or regorafenib (n=95) at a US tertiary oncology center.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Taiho Oncology Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA. No conflict of interests was disclosed.

Source: Patel AK et al. Oncologist. 2021 Aug 18. doi: 10.1002/onco.13942.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: CRC October 2021
Gate On Date
Thu, 06/24/2021 - 16:45
Un-Gate On Date
Thu, 06/24/2021 - 16:45
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Thu, 06/24/2021 - 16:45
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article