User login
Adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib show no significant advantages in disease-free or overall survival over placebo in patients with high-risk clear cell renal cancer, according to secondary analysis of data from the ASSURE trial.
The primary analysis of data from the ASSURE trial, which included patients with all types of renal cell carcinoma, had failed to show a benefit in disease-free survival.
“Given recently published results of a 750-patient randomized trial, S-TRAC, (sunitinib 50 mg daily [4/2 schedule] vs placebo in clear cell predominant pT3-4 or node-positive disease) that show improved [disease-free survival], the appropriate adjuvant strategy for high-risk patients is unclear,” Naomi B. Haas, MD, and coauthors wrote (JAMA Oncol. 2017 Mar 9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0076).
Therefore, the investigators focused on a subset of patients from the ASSURE trial with high-risk clear cell renal cancer to determine if there might be a benefit in this group.
The secondary analysis involved 1,069 participants with pT3 and higher or node-positive renal cancer with clear cell histology who were randomized to receive 54 weeks of sunitinib (50mg, oral daily for 28 of 42 days per cycle), sorafenib (400 mg, oral twice daily continuously), or placebo.
The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 47.7% for patients in the sunitinib arm, 49.9% for those taking sorafenib, and 50% for placebo, with no statistically significant difference between the three groups. The 5-year overall survival rate was 75.2% for the sunitinib arm, 80.2% in the sorafenib arm, and 76.5% for those on placebo, with no statistically significant differences between the groups, reported Dr. Haas of the Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and colleagues.
“This high-risk population had a better 5-year recurrence-free rate (around 50%) than expected (41.9% for high-risk disease and 36.0% for node-positive disease), possibly a result of better surgical technique, more accurate staging, or unknown biologic factors,” the authors wrote.
When the researchers analyzed disease-free survival according to quartiles of total dose per 6-week cycle, they also found no differences between each quartile of average dose per cycle.
There was, however, a significantly higher rate of grade 3 or higher adverse events in the sunitinib arm (66%) and sorafenib group (72%), compared with placebo (22%).
“Based on this analysis, a rationale for adjuvant therapy in this high-risk population is not elucidated,” Dr. Haas and colleagues said.
The study was coordinated by the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group and supported by Public Health Service grants, the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Health & Human Services. The drugs and placebos were provided by Bayer and Pfizer through the National Cancer Institute.
Adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib show no significant advantages in disease-free or overall survival over placebo in patients with high-risk clear cell renal cancer, according to secondary analysis of data from the ASSURE trial.
The primary analysis of data from the ASSURE trial, which included patients with all types of renal cell carcinoma, had failed to show a benefit in disease-free survival.
“Given recently published results of a 750-patient randomized trial, S-TRAC, (sunitinib 50 mg daily [4/2 schedule] vs placebo in clear cell predominant pT3-4 or node-positive disease) that show improved [disease-free survival], the appropriate adjuvant strategy for high-risk patients is unclear,” Naomi B. Haas, MD, and coauthors wrote (JAMA Oncol. 2017 Mar 9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0076).
Therefore, the investigators focused on a subset of patients from the ASSURE trial with high-risk clear cell renal cancer to determine if there might be a benefit in this group.
The secondary analysis involved 1,069 participants with pT3 and higher or node-positive renal cancer with clear cell histology who were randomized to receive 54 weeks of sunitinib (50mg, oral daily for 28 of 42 days per cycle), sorafenib (400 mg, oral twice daily continuously), or placebo.
The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 47.7% for patients in the sunitinib arm, 49.9% for those taking sorafenib, and 50% for placebo, with no statistically significant difference between the three groups. The 5-year overall survival rate was 75.2% for the sunitinib arm, 80.2% in the sorafenib arm, and 76.5% for those on placebo, with no statistically significant differences between the groups, reported Dr. Haas of the Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and colleagues.
“This high-risk population had a better 5-year recurrence-free rate (around 50%) than expected (41.9% for high-risk disease and 36.0% for node-positive disease), possibly a result of better surgical technique, more accurate staging, or unknown biologic factors,” the authors wrote.
When the researchers analyzed disease-free survival according to quartiles of total dose per 6-week cycle, they also found no differences between each quartile of average dose per cycle.
There was, however, a significantly higher rate of grade 3 or higher adverse events in the sunitinib arm (66%) and sorafenib group (72%), compared with placebo (22%).
“Based on this analysis, a rationale for adjuvant therapy in this high-risk population is not elucidated,” Dr. Haas and colleagues said.
The study was coordinated by the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group and supported by Public Health Service grants, the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Health & Human Services. The drugs and placebos were provided by Bayer and Pfizer through the National Cancer Institute.
Adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib show no significant advantages in disease-free or overall survival over placebo in patients with high-risk clear cell renal cancer, according to secondary analysis of data from the ASSURE trial.
The primary analysis of data from the ASSURE trial, which included patients with all types of renal cell carcinoma, had failed to show a benefit in disease-free survival.
“Given recently published results of a 750-patient randomized trial, S-TRAC, (sunitinib 50 mg daily [4/2 schedule] vs placebo in clear cell predominant pT3-4 or node-positive disease) that show improved [disease-free survival], the appropriate adjuvant strategy for high-risk patients is unclear,” Naomi B. Haas, MD, and coauthors wrote (JAMA Oncol. 2017 Mar 9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0076).
Therefore, the investigators focused on a subset of patients from the ASSURE trial with high-risk clear cell renal cancer to determine if there might be a benefit in this group.
The secondary analysis involved 1,069 participants with pT3 and higher or node-positive renal cancer with clear cell histology who were randomized to receive 54 weeks of sunitinib (50mg, oral daily for 28 of 42 days per cycle), sorafenib (400 mg, oral twice daily continuously), or placebo.
The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 47.7% for patients in the sunitinib arm, 49.9% for those taking sorafenib, and 50% for placebo, with no statistically significant difference between the three groups. The 5-year overall survival rate was 75.2% for the sunitinib arm, 80.2% in the sorafenib arm, and 76.5% for those on placebo, with no statistically significant differences between the groups, reported Dr. Haas of the Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and colleagues.
“This high-risk population had a better 5-year recurrence-free rate (around 50%) than expected (41.9% for high-risk disease and 36.0% for node-positive disease), possibly a result of better surgical technique, more accurate staging, or unknown biologic factors,” the authors wrote.
When the researchers analyzed disease-free survival according to quartiles of total dose per 6-week cycle, they also found no differences between each quartile of average dose per cycle.
There was, however, a significantly higher rate of grade 3 or higher adverse events in the sunitinib arm (66%) and sorafenib group (72%), compared with placebo (22%).
“Based on this analysis, a rationale for adjuvant therapy in this high-risk population is not elucidated,” Dr. Haas and colleagues said.
The study was coordinated by the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group and supported by Public Health Service grants, the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Health & Human Services. The drugs and placebos were provided by Bayer and Pfizer through the National Cancer Institute.
FROM JAMA ONCOLOGY
Key clinical point: Adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib show no significant benefit in disease-free or overall survival in patients with high-risk clear cell renal cancer.
Major finding: The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 47.7% for patients treated with sunitinib, 49.9% for those treated with sorafenib, and 50% for those given placebo.
Data source: Secondary analysis of data from the ASSURE trial in 1,943 patients with pT3 and higher or node-positive renal cancer with clear cell histology.
Disclosures: The study was coordinated by the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group and supported by Public Health Service grants, the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Health & Human Services. The drugs and placebos were provided by Bayer and Pfizer through the National Cancer Institute.